DOCSLIB.ORG

The Maros/Mure§ River Valley

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Maros/Mure§ River Valley TISCIA monograph series The Maros/Mure§ River Valley A study of the geography, hydrobiology and ecology of the river and its environment Szolnok - Szeged - Tirgu Mure§ 1995 The Maros/Mure§ River Valley A study of the geography, hydrobiology and ecology of the river and its environment Editors Hamar, J. & Sarkany-Kiss, A. Szolnok - Szeged - Tirgu Mure§ 1995 > Contributing Organizations Hungarian Water Fund Friedrich Naumann Foundation Project Editors: J. Hamar & A. Sárkány-Kiss English language Editor: Anne-Marie Nicoara Copy Editors: Ilona Bárány-Kevei, L. Csizmazia, K. Györe, Gy. Kádár, G. Matus, Katalin Nagy, Judit Padisák, A. Szabó, A. Szító, Erzsébet O. Tóth, C. Tudorancea, Cover design and layout: L. Körmöczi First Edition published by Tisza Klub Tisza Klub for Environment and Nature 5000 Szolnok, pf.148., Hungary Printed by Kanalasgém Kft. ISBN 963 04 5103 4 Contents Preface 3 Foreword 4 The geography of the River Maros (Mure§) and its river system 7 Soils of the flood plain of the Mure§ (Maros) River 25 The flora and vegetation of the Mure§ (Maros) valley 47 Data on the chemical composition of the Mure§ (Maros) River 113 Physical and chemical characteristics of the Maros (Mure§) River 119 Study on organic micropollutants of the Maros (Mure§) River 135 Data on the estimation of the hygienic bacteriological condition of the Maros (Mure§) River 143 Algological studies of the Maros (Mure§) River 149 The protozoan plankton and their saprobity relations in the Maros (Mure§) River.... 165 Zooplankton investigation in a longitudinal section of the Maros (Mure§) River 175 Macrozoobenthos in the Maros (Mure§) River 185 Malacological survey on the Mure§ (Maros) River 193 Snail assemblages of gallery forests between Lippa (lipova) and Mako 203 Fish of the Mure§ (Maros) River: systematics and ecology 225 The birds of the Mure§ (Maros) River 235 Muskrats (Ondatra zybethica L. 1766) in the Mure§ (Maros) River Valley 245 Appendix 251 1 2 "The river is present itself If you touch it You have encroached upon The last drop of the past And the first of the future. " Leonardo da Vinci Preface The Maros/Mure§ River with its 768-km length is the largest waterway in the Tisza River catchment area, and like the other rivers in the Carpathian Basin it is the lifeblood of the settlements, industrial and agricultural facilities in its valley. The ecological condition of these rivers and of their catchment area is economically important, but its value increases exponentially if we consider the natural values here, and their conservation. The rivers of the region connect the neighboring countries, making the environmental problems of these rivers international; the solutions must also be international, and cooperative. Since 1991 Hungarian and Romanian non-governmental organizations (NGOs), by calling in experts from both countries, has started interdisciplinary research to assess the common river's environmental condition (see Appendix). The cooperating social organizations have aimed to create a database for public awareness and protection. This book is the first published results of the cooperation between Tisza Klub and the Environmental Group of Liga Pro Europa. The information here may serve as a basis for future comparisons on the condition of the environment. It may also provide a foundation for NGOs to outline proposals for the organizations and agencies concerned. We would like to offer our thanks to all who have helped us with our work: the generous support of other NGOs, media representatives, ministeries, universities, museums and research institutions in both countries made this project possible. We would like to particularly express our thanks to the Hungarian Parliament, the Regional Environmental Center and the Council of Europe. In the course of our work we have covered the Szamos/Some§ in 1992, and in 1994 the Fekete and Fehér Körös/Cri§ul Negru and Alb. Next will be the Sebes Körös/Cri§ul Repede and the Berettyó/Beratau River, culminating with the Upper Tisza. József Hamar Andrei Sárkány-Kiss Tisza Klub, Szolnok, Hungary Liga Pro Europa, Environmental Group, Romania 3 FOREWORD Just when modern, urban man is losing contact with wilderness, the interest to reestablish this contact — to know as much as possible about plants, animals, wilderness — spreads. People are increasingly turning to the forests, caves, seashores for their recreation; even indoor nature lovers — aquarium hobbyists, flower gardeners — are increasing. Hundreds of amateur and professional field books are published annually in a variety of languages. And from all this, people are increasingly interested in nature conservation, especially the protection of threatened or endangered species. Some quiet observer once noted that the disappearance of any species equals the loss of a cultural document. In truth each species is a document that clarifies just a single small, but vital, detail in the dazzlingly complex process of organic evolution. Collections are underway, across countries and continents, for both plants and animals that will soon disappear altogether. Everything from subject-specific areas, to drastic modifications to life conditions (so-called "development"), are being collected for historical preservation in herbaria and museum collections. But this is not a solution; not even for pure science. The phyletic position of any species cannot be established solely through morphological study; biochemical, molecular, and other characteristics which cannot be determined in preserved specimens, are presently used. Other, perhaps more significant characteristics will surely be discovered in the near future. But these can only be established in living specimens. Wilderness preservation is necessary not only to satisfy the scientific curiosity of zoologists and botanists. Each species plays a role in nature; nothing is isolated. Every species for a given location is intimately interrelated and interdependent within that community. Man is a member of that community. And human survival depends on a "sane" nature, an ecological stability with other species. Air and water pollution, deforestation (invariably followed by wholesale modification of the local climate) have drastic effects on all life. The resistance of different species to environmental modifications varies; the most sensitive disappear at the slightest deterioration in their environment. Others can withstand substantial changes — some species actually favor moderate levels of water pollution, climate modification, etc. But the total number of species, the biodiversity, is diminishing constantly. Within a given community, the higher the biodiversity, the more stable is a biotic community (biocoenosis). When biodiversity diminishes, a true ecological catastrophe becomes possible, spilling inevitably into the human realm. To prevent such catastrophes, we need detailed information on biodiversity, species composition. Specialists must establish floral and faunal communities (zoologists and botanists), as well as other scientists trained to determine life conditions: temperatures, soil and water chemistry, geology, hydrology. The following works comprise one such multi-disciplinary study, devoted to the Mure§/Maros River, the largest tributary to the Tisza, itself the largest tributary of the Danube River system. The Mure§ is also the largest river system in Translyvania and 4 Romania. It has sources in eastern Translyvania, and drains the majority of this historical province as well as the more western provinces of Romania (Cri§ana and Banat) and southeastern Hungary, joining the Tisza in Hungary just north of the Serbian frontier. The Mure§/Maros' upper reaches flow through an almost horizontal plateau, lacking a true montane (trout) zone; it develops a montane character further downstream, between Topli§a and Deda. Throughout most of its Translyvanian path the river is again a lowland stream, becoming once again a rapid river as it crosses the western Carpathians between historical Translyvania and western Romania. This study is the result of a collaborative effort between Romanian and Hungarian scientists. Most of the data in this volume was collected on two expeditions along the river, from its source to its confluence with the Tisza. At the time of the expeditions, the Mure§/Maros River itself was already in an advanced state of pollution. The water chemistry, bacteriological conditions (as relates to public health), and faunal community compositions clearly demonstrated good conditions in the upper reaches of the river, deteriorating downstream. The terrestrial vegetation of the flood plain and river valley is also more degraded. Currently, data in the scientific literature is scarce, particularly concerning conditions prior to industrialization; early data refers only to molluscs, fish and bird life. The Mure§/Maros Project was extraordinarily successful: rich, detailed information on the biological status of the river has been collected in just one year of investigation. Continuing studies will be necessary, to collect more data (primarily on the aquatic groups not dealt with in the present study - various orders and families of aquatic insects, amphibians) and to extend the study along the tributaries of the Mure§, all of which influence the life of the main river. Petru M. Banarescu corresponding member Romanian Academy of Sciences 5 (rkm) 0.1 Izvorul-Mures 1 10 3 = Seneta 2 16 Suseni 3 62 ~ Sarmos 4 105 - - Rastolita 5 188 - - Tirgu Mures 6 207 Ungheni 7 282 Gura Aries 9 355 Sintimbru 10
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Discharge Alterations of the Mures River, Romania Under Ensembles of Future Climate Projections and Sequential Threats to Aquatic Ecosystem by the End of the Century
    Water 2015, 7, 2753-2770; doi:10.3390/w7062753 OPEN ACCESS water ISSN 2073-4441 www.mdpi.com/journal/water Article Discharge Alterations of the Mures River, Romania under Ensembles of Future Climate Projections and Sequential Threats to Aquatic Ecosystem by the End of the Century Anastasia Lobanova *, Judith Stagl, Tobias Vetter and Fred Hattermann Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Telegraphenberg A 31, Potsdam 14473, Germany; E-Mails: [email protected] (J.S.); [email protected] (T.V.); [email protected] (F.H.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-331-288-207-53. Academic Editor: Athanasios Loukas Received: 22 April 2015 / Accepted: 22 May 2015 / Published: 9 June 2015 Abstract: This study aims to assess the potential alterations in the hydrological regime attributed to projected climate change in one of the largest rivers in the Carpathian Area, the Mures River, and to estimate associated threats to riverine ecosystem. The eco-hydrological model, Soil and Water Integrated Model (SWIM), was applied on the Mures River basin, calibrated and validated against records at a gauging station in Alba-Julia town. A set of nine future projections for climatic parameters under one emissions scenario A1B over the period 1971–2100 were fed into the SWIM model. To provide functional link between hydrological regimes and riverine ecosystems, each of the nine simulated discharge time series were introduced into the IHA (Indicators of Hydrological Alterations) tool. Triggered changes in hydrological patterns of the Mures River were assessed at the basin and sub-basin scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Administraţia Bazinală De Apă Mureş
    PLANUL DE MANAGEMENT AL RISCULUI LA INUNDAŢII Administraţia Bazinală de Apă Mureş Planul de Management al Riscului la Inundaţii Administraţia Bazinală de Apă Mureş Planul de Management al Riscului la Inundaţii Administraţia Bazinală de Apă Mureş CUPRINS Abrevieri ................................................................................................................................... 4 Cap. 1: Prezentarea generală a bazinului hidrografic Mureș .................................................. 6 Cap. 2: Riscul la inundaţii în bazinul hidrografic Mureş ....................................................... 14 2.1. Descrierea lucrărilor existente de protecție împotriva inundațiilor ............................. 14 2.2. Descrierea sistemelor existente de avertizare - alarmare şi de răspuns la inundaţii ............................................................................................ 43 2.3. Istoricul inundaţiilor .................................................................................................... 51 2.4. Evenimentele semnificative de inundaţii ..................................................................... 53 2.5. Zone cu risc potențial semnificativ la inundații ........................................................... 55 2.6. Hărți de hazard și hărți de risc la inundații .................................................................. 59 2.7. Indicatori statistici ....................................................................................................... 63 Cap. 3: Descrierea obiectivelor
    [Show full text]
  • Fonduri Şi Colecţii Date În Cercetare Direcţia Judeţeană Mureş a Arhivelor Naţionale Nr. Crt. Nr. Inventar Denumirea
    Fonduri şi colecţii date în cercetare Direcţia Judeţeană Mureş a Arhivelor Naţionale Nr. crt. Nr. inventar Denumirea Fondului sau Colecţiei Anii extremi Nr. u.a. 1. 681 Administraţia financiară a judeţului Mureş 1944-1949 39 2. 1268 Administraţia financiară a judeţului Tîrnava Mare 1887-1920 892 3. 1199 Aeroportul Tîrgu-Mureş 1961-1982 48 4. 1192 Ansamblul artistic Mureşul Tîrgu-Mureş 1956-1985 179 5. 1302 Apărarea Patriotică organizaţia judeţeană Mureş 1945-1947 3 6. 852, 1096 Arbitrajul de stat de pe lâng ă Sfatul popular al Regiunii Mureş Autonome 1954-1984 452 Maghiare 7. 1333 ARLUS consiliul orăşenesc Tîrgu-Mureş 1959 1 8. 1334 ARLUS consiliul raional Reghin 1951-1958 8 9. 1335 ARLUS consiliul raional Sîngeorgiu de Pădure 195 1-1960 8 10. 1336 ARLUS consiliul raional Tîrgu-Mureş 1952-1959 6 11. 1327 ARLUS consiliul regional Mureş 1950-1963 24 12. 1312 ARLUS filiala judeţeană Mureş 1946-1950 5 13. 39 Asociaţia comercianţilor Tîrgu-Mureş 1901-1952 479 14. 33, 34 Asociaţia constructorilor Tîrgu-Mureş 1839-1950 14 15. 480 Asociaţia de gimnastică Tîrgu-Mureş 1924-1940 1 16. 79 Asociaţia de înmormântare a pensionarilor şi funcţionarilor Tîrgu-Mureş 1851-1952 65 17. 1198 Asociaţia economică intercooperatistă pentru creşterea bovinelor Pănet 1973-1982 63 18. 29,4 1 Asociaţia industrială a blănarilor Tîrgu-Mureş 1489-1924 894 19. 169 Asociaţia industrială a cizmarilor Reghin 1728-1949 9 20. 24, 32 Asociaţia industrială a cizmarilor Tîrgu-Mureş 1629-1949 172 21. 35 Asociaţia industrială a frânghierilor Tîrgu-Mureş 1708-1889 3 22. 37 Asociaţia industrială a măcelarilor Tîrgu-Mureş 1717-1836 313 1 23.
    [Show full text]
  • Planul Local De Actiune Pentru Mediu Al Judetului Mures 2016-2022
    Planul local de actiune pentru mediu al judetului Mures 2016-2022 PLANUL LOCAL DE ACŢIUNE PPEENNTTRRUU MMEEDDIIUU JJUUDDEEŢŢUULL MMUURREESS 22001166 –– 22002222 1 Planul local de actiune pentru mediu al judetului Mures 2016-2022 CUPRINS Capitolul 1. Introducere în noţiunea de Plan de acţiune pentru mediu 1.1 Ce este un Plan Local de Acţiune pentru Mediu şi care rolul său în judeţul Mureş? 1.2 Structura şi metodologia utilizată pentru elaborarea PLAM Capitolul 2. Profilul teritorial al judeţului Mureş 2.1 Caracteristici fizico – geografice 2.1.1 Aşezarea 2.1.2 Relieful şi geologia 2.1.3 Clima 2.1.4 Reţeaua hidrografică 2.1.5 Flora şi fauna 2.1.6 Solurile 2.1.7 Resursele naturale 2.2 Caracteristici administrative şi economice 2.2.1 Organizarea administrativ teritorială 2.2.2 Caracteristici generale ale economiei judeţului 2.3 Activităţi industriale şi agricole 2.3.1 Industria 2.3.2 Agricultura 2.3.3 Sectorul terţiar 2.3.4 Comerţul 2.3.5 Transporturile 2.3.6 Telecomunicaţiile Capitolul 3. Starea mediului în judeţul Mureş 3.1 Calitatea aerului 3.1.1 Emisii de poluanţi atmosferici 3.1.2 Monitorizarea calităţii aerului 3.2 Calitatea apelor 3.2.1 Apele de suprafaţă 3.2.2 Apele subterane 3.2.3 Apa potabilă şi apa de îmbăiere 3.2.4 Apele uzate şi reţelele de canalizare 3.3 Starea solurilor 3.3.1 Repartiţia solurilor pe clase de folosinţă 3.3.2 Calitatea solurilor 3.4 Starea pădurilor 3.5 Starea ariilor protejate 3.6 Starea radioactivităţii 3.7 Mediul, sănătatea şi calitatea vieţii 3.7.1 Poluarea aerului şi sănătatea 3.7.2 Efectele apei poluate
    [Show full text]
  • Tabel Atribute RO 11.05.2015
    Garda Cod / Validare Justificari eliminare (doar la nivel Id trup ID judet / trup Judet Bazinet C1 C2 C3 C4 Forestiera Nivel risc finala de bazinete /trup) 7 AB-7 Cluj AB Molivis AB-7 Total trup 1 0 0 0 galben 9 AB-9 Cluj AB Miras (Cotul) AB-9 Total trup 1 1 0 0 rosu 10 AB-10 Cluj AB Raul Mic AB-10 Total trup 1 0 0 0 galben 12 AB-12 Cluj AB Martinie (Marginea, Tetu) AB-12 Total trup 0 1 0 0 rosu 14 AB-14 Cluj AB Grosesti AB-14 Total trup 0 1 0 0 rosu 15 AB-15 Cluj AB Brustura AB-15 Total trup 1 0 0 0 galben 16 AB-16 Cluj AB Valea Tonii AB-16 Total trup 1 0 0 0 galben 19 AB-19 Cluj AB Chipesa AB-19 Total trup 1 0 0 0 galben 20 AB-20 Cluj AB Garbova AB-20 Total trup 1 0 0 0 galben 26 AB-26 Cluj AB Boz AB-26 Total trup 0 1 0 0 rosu 27 AB-27 Cluj AB Vingard AB-27 Total trup 0 1 0 0 rosu 29 AB-29 Cluj AB Ungurei AB-29 Total trup 0 1 0 0 rosu 30 AB-30 Cluj AB Gardan AB-30 Total trup 0 1 0 0 rosu 31 AB-31 Cluj AB Ohaba (Valea Mare) AB-31 Total trup 0 1 0 0 rosu 38 AB-38 Cluj AB Cenade AB-38 Total trup 0 1 0 0 rosu 39 AB-39 Cluj AB Tarnava (Tarnava Mare) AB-39 Total trup 0 0 0 0 galben 40 AB-40 Cluj AB Lodroman AB-40 Total trup 0 1 0 0 rosu 41 AB-41 Cluj AB Valea Lunga (Tauni) AB-41 Total trup 0 1 0 0 rosu 44 AB-44 Cluj AB Graben AB-44 Total trup 0 1 0 0 rosu 45 AB-45 Cluj AB Spinoasa AB-45 Total trup 1 1 0 1 rosu 46 AB-46 Cluj AB Tatarlaua AB-46 Total trup 1 1 0 1 rosu 48 AB-48 Cluj AB Veseus AB-48 Total trup 1 0 0 0 galben 49 AB-49 Cluj AB Pe Dealul cel mai Departe AB-49 Total trup 1 0 0 0 galben 53 AB-53 Cluj AB Dunarita (Bucerdea) AB-53 Total
    [Show full text]
  • Anexa Nr. 1 Lista Consolidată a Ariilor Naturale Protejate Din România
    Anexa nr. 1 Lista consolidată a ariilor naturale protejate din România Lista ariilor naturale protejate din România cuprinde codul ariei naturale protejate, denumirea acesteia precum și Unitățile Administrativ Teritoriale pe teritoriul cărora se află. 1. LISTA ARIILOR NATURALE PROTEJATE DE INTERES NAȚIONAL 1.a. PARCURI NAȚIONALE RONPA0001 Domogled - Valea Cernei Județul Caraș-Severin: Băile Herculane, Cornereva, Mehadia, Teregova, Topleț, Zăvoi Județul Gorj: Padeș, Tismana Județul Hunedoara: Râu de Mori Județul Mehedinți: Balta, Isverna, Obârșia-Cloșani, Podeni RONPA0002 Retezat Județul Caraș-Severin: Zăvoi Județul Gorj: Padeș, Tismana Județul Hunedoara: Pui, Râu de Mori, Sălașu de Sus, Uricani RONPA0003 Cheile Nerei - Beușnița Județul Caraș-Severin: Anina, Bozovici, Cărbunari, Ciclova Română, Dalboșeț, Lăpușnicu Mare, Șopotu Nou, Oravița, Sasca Montană RONPA0005 Munții Rodnei Județul Bistrița-Năsăud: Șanț, Maieru, Parva, Rebrișoara, Rodna, Romuli, Sângeorz-Băi, Telciu Județul Maramureș: Borșa, Moisei, Săcel RONPA0007 Cheile Bicazului - Hășmaș Județul Harghita: Gheorgheni, Sândominic, Tulgheș Județul Neamț: Bicaz-Chei, Dămuc RONPA0008 Ceahlău Județul Neamț: Bicaz, Bicazu Ardelean, Ceahlău, Tașca RONPA0009 Călimani Județul Bistrița-Năsăud: Bistrița Bârgăului Județul Harghita: Bilbor, Toplița Județul Mureș: Lunca Bradului, Răstolița Județul Suceava: Șaru Dornei, Dorna Candrenilor, Panaci, Poiana Stampei RONPA0010 Cozia Județul Vâlcea: Băile Olănești, Berislăvești, Brezoi, Călimănești, Muereasca, Perișani, Racovița, Sălătrucel RONPA0011 Piatra Craiului Județul Argeș: Dâmbovicioara, Dragoslavele, Rucăr 1 Județul Brașov: Bran, Fundata, Moieciu, Zărnești RONPA0012 Semenic - Cheile Carașului Județul Caraș-Severin: Anina, Bozovici, Carașova, Goruia, Prigor, Reșița, Teregova, Văliug RONPA0016 Munții Măcinului Județul Tulcea: Cerna, Greci, Hamcearca, Jijila, Luncavița, Măcin RONPA0848 Buila - Vânturarița Județul Vâlcea: Băile Olănești, Bărbătești, Costești RONPA0933 Defileul Jiului Județul Gorj: Bumbești-Jiu, Schela Județul Hunedoara: Aninoasa, Petroșani, Vulcan 1.b.
    [Show full text]
  • Runoff Potential of Mureş River Upper Basin Tributaries
    RUNOFF POTENTIAL OF MUREŞ RIVER UPPER BASIN TRIBUTARIES V. SOROCOVSCHI1, CS.HORVÁTH2 ABSTRACT. – Runoff Potential of Mureş River Upper Basin Tributaries. The upper basin of the Mureş River includes a significant area of the Eastern Carpathians central western part with different runoff formation conditions. In assessing the average annual runoff potential we used data from six gauging stations and made assessments on three distinct periods. Identifying the appropriate areas of the obtained correlations curves (between specific average runoff and catchments mean altitude) allowed the assessment of potential runoff at catchment level and on geographical units. The potential average runoff is also assessed on altitude intervals of the mentioned areas. The runoff potential analysis on hydrographic basins, geographical units and altitude intervals highlights the variant spatial distribution of this general water resources indicator in the different studied areas. Keywords: water resources, Mureş upper basin, geographic units, altitude intervals 1. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS The upper basin of the Mureş River includes a significant area of the Eastern Carpathians central western part, also known as Moldavo-Transylvanian Carpathians (V. Mihăilescu, 1963). In the study area we find a large part of the Eastern Carpathians neoeruptive chain, represented by the southern slopes of Căliman Mountains, eastern and northern slopes of the Gurghiu Mountains and the northern extremity of the Harghita Mountains (Fig. 1). The runoff formation conditions in the vulcanic chain depend of the neoeruptive relief altitude, which is generally decreasing from north to south, and of the exposure to the advection of western moist air masses. The volcanic relief morphology (cones, craters and plateaus, less represented in the study area) influences only the direction of runoff.
    [Show full text]
  • Numarul De Studenti, Pe Universitati Si Localitati - Dupa Domiciliul Studentului - CICLURI Studiu (Univ)
    Numarul de studenti, pe universitati si localitati - Dupa domiciliul studentului - CICLURI studiu (univ) TOTAL Licenta TOTAL Master TOTAL Doctorat TOTAL GENERAL Studenti 7267 745 264 8276 Defalcare pe universitati si localitati - Cicluri studiu Nr. crt. Universitate Localitate_Domiciliu SIRUTA_Localitate TOTAL Licenta TOTAL Master TOTAL Doctorat Nr Total Studenti 1 Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie din Tîrgu Mureş 922 44 1 967 2 Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie din Tîrgu Mureş ABRUD 1160 6 6 2 14 3 Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie din Tîrgu Mureş ABUD 117060 4 0 0 4 4 Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie din Tîrgu Mureş ACAŢARI 114989 2 1 0 3 5 Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie din Tîrgu Mureş ADAMUŞ 115085 4 1 0 5 6 Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie din Tîrgu Mureş ADJUD 174879 2 0 0 2 7 Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie din Tîrgu Mureş ADJUDENI 124652 3 0 0 3 8 Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie din Tîrgu Mureş ADRIANU MARE 116885 1 0 0 1 9 Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie din Tîrgu Mureş ADUNAŢI 131906 1 0 0 1 10 Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie din Tîrgu Mureş AGAŞ 21016 3 0 0 3 11 Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie din Tîrgu Mureş AGHIREŞ 142097 1 0 0 1 12 Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie din Tîrgu Mureş AGIGEA 63269 0 1 0 1 13 Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie din Tîrgu Mureş AGNITA 143691 3 1 0 4 14 Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie din Tîrgu Mureş AITA MARE 63786 4 0 0 4 15 Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie din Tîrgu Mureş AITA MEDIE 63795 1 0 0 1 16 Universitatea de
    [Show full text]
  • Land Capability Classification for Crop and Fruit Product Assessment Using GIS Technology. Case Study
    Available online: www.notulaebotanicae.ro Print ISSN 0255-965X; Electronic 1842-4309 Not Bot Horti Agrobo , 2015, 43(1):235-242. DOI:10.15835/nbha4319860 Land Capability Classification for Crop and Fruit Product Assessment Using GIS Technology. Case Study: The Niraj River Basin (Transylvania Depression, Romania) Sanda ROȘCA 1, Ştefan BILAŞCO 1,2 *, Ioan PĂCURAR 3, Marcel ONCU 1, Cornel NEGRUŞIER 3, Dănuț PETREA 1 1“Babe ş-Bolyai” University, Faculty of Geography, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; [email protected] ; [email protected] (*corresponding author); [email protected] ; [email protected] 2Romanian Academy, Cluj-Napoca Subsidiary Geography Section, 400015, Cluj-Napoca, Romania 3University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, 3-5 Mănăştur St., 5400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; [email protected] ; [email protected] Abstract The efficient capitalisation of agricultural land is dependent on determining the environmental suitability of the area and on identifying the most appropriate culture types for a particular terrain. Because of its complex landforms, the anthropic pressure and the irrational use of land on large surfaces, the Basin of Niraj River was the object of a reorganising process in the production activities, by emphasising the agricultural land use as a resource for sustainable development, which has been too long underexploited. The technique of capability classification, in collaboration with the GIS techniques of spatial analysis, represents one of the most facile and concrete ways of identifying and creating an inventory of lands which fulfil the best conditions for the creation of orchards, through the use of specific indicators: climatic, morphometric, morphologic, pedologic.
    [Show full text]
  • Anexe Volum II
    PLANUL DE MANAGEMENT ACTUALIZAT AL BAZINULUI HIDROGRAFIC MUREȘ ANEXE / VOLUMUL 2 CUPRINS Anexa 9.3 Măsuri de bază pentru asigurarea infrastructurii de apă uzată în bazinul hidrografic Mureș............................................................................ 4 Anexa 9.4 Măsuri de bază pentru implementarea cerințelor directivelor europene în domeniul agriculturii in bazinul hidrografic Mureş................. 275 Anexa 9.5 Proiecte privind implementarea Directivei Habitate 92/43/CEE și Directivei Păsări 79/409/CEE ................................................................ 287 Anexa 9.6 Folosinţe de apă care intră sub incidenţa Directivei IED (din punct de vedere al gospodăririi apelor)............................................................ 297 Anexa 9.7 Stadiul implementării măsurilor pentru unităţile IED raportate E- PRTR (pentru factorul de mediu apă) din bazinul hidrografic Mureş.......... 312 Anexa 9.8 Inventarul din anul 2012 a amplasamentelor care se încadrează sub incidența Directiva 2012/18/UE privind controlul pericolelor de accidente majore care implică substanțe periculoase (Seveso III), din bazinul hidrografic Mureş.............................................................................................. 313 Anexa 9.9 Măsuri de bază pentru reducerea efectelor presiunilor cauzate de activităţile industriale în bazinul hidrografic Mureş................................... 319 Anexa 9.10 Măsuri de bază pentru reducerea efectelor presiunilor cauzate de activităţile agricole (ferme/complexe zootehnice) din bazinul
    [Show full text]
  • Situație Rate De Incidenta La Nivel De Localități 07.09.2020
    Situație rate de incidenta la nivel de localități 07.09.2020 1 Municipiul București Rata de BUCURESTI incidenta la 1000 locuitori Total Municipiul Bucuresti 1.12 2 Alba ALBA Rata de Localitate incidenta la 1000 locuitori MUNICIPIUL ALBA IULIA 1.11 MUNICIPIUL AIUD 0.55 MUNICIPIUL BLAJ 0.68 MUNICIPIUL SEBES 0.43 ORAS ABRUD 0.00 ORAS BAIA DE ARIES 0.26 ORAS CAMPENI 0.54 ORAS CUGIR 0.35 ORAS OCNA MURES 0.07 ORAS TEIUS 0.55 ORAS ZLATNA 0.25 ALBAC 1.49 ALMASU MARE 0.82 3 ARIESENI 0.00 AVRAM IANCU 0.00 BERGHIN 1.01 BISTRA 0.00 BLANDIANA 1.12 BUCERDEA GRANOASA 0.00 BUCIUM 0.70 CALNIC 0.00 CENADE 0.00 CERGAU 0.00 CERU-BACAINTI 0.00 CETATEA DE BALTA 0.65 CIUGUD 0.32 CIURULEASA 0.00 CRACIUNELU DE JOS 0.00 CRICAU 0.00 CUT 0.00 DAIA ROMANA 0.97 DOSTAT 0.00 FARAU 0.00 GALDA DE JOS 0.23 GARBOVA 1.43 GARDA DE SUS 0.64 HOPARTA 0.00 HOREA 0.00 IGHIU 0.43 INTREGALDE 0.00 JIDVEI 0.19 LIVEZILE 0.00 LOPADEA NOUA 0.00 LUNCA MURESULUI 0.00 LUPSA 0.00 METES 0.37 MIHALT 1.54 MIRASLAU 1.50 MOGOS 1.29 NOSLAC 0.00 OCOLIS 0.00 OHABA 0.00 PIANU 0.00 POIANA VADULUI 0.00 PONOR 0.00 POSAGA 1.05 RADESTI 0.00 RIMET 0.00 4 RIMETEA 0.00 ROSIA DE SECAS 0.00 ROSIA MONTANA 0.36 SALCIUA 0.00 SALISTEA 1.29 SINCEL 0.38 SINTIMBRU 0.00 SASCIORI 0.16 SCARISOARA 0.00 SIBOT 0.00 SOHODOL 0.59 SONA 0.00 SPRING 0.40 STREMT 0.42 SUGAG 1.03 UNIREA 0.20 VADU MOTILOR 0.00 VALEA LUNGA 0.33 VIDRA 0.00 VINTU DE JOS 0.37 5 Arad ARAD Localitate Rata de incidenta la 1000 locuitori MUNICIPIUL ARAD 0.67 ORAS CHISINEU-CRIS 0.61 ORAS CURTICI 0.91 ORAS INEU 2.10 ORAS LIPOVA 0.89 ORAS NADLAC 0.38 ORAS
    [Show full text]
  • Planul De Management Al Riscului La Inundații Mureș
    PLANUL DE MANAGEMENT AL RISCULUI LA INUNDAŢII Administraţia Bazinală de Apă Mureș Planul de Management al Riscului la Inundaţii Administraţia Bazinală de Apă Mureş Planul de Management al Riscului la Inundaţii Administraţia Bazinală de Apă Mureş CUPRINS Abrevieri ................................................................................................................................... 4 Cap. 1: Prezentarea generală a bazinului hidrografic Mureș .................................................. 7 Cap. 2: Riscul la inundaţii în bazinul hidrografic Mureș ....................................................... 14 2.1. Descrierea lucrărilor existente de protecție împotriva inundațiilor ............................. 14 2.2. Descrierea sistemelor existente de avertizare - alarmare şi de răspuns la inundaţii ............................................................................................ 43 2.3. Istoricul inundaţiilor .................................................................................................... 51 2.4. Evenimentele semnificative de inundaţii ..................................................................... 53 2.5. Zone cu risc potențial semnificativ la inundații ........................................................... 55 2.6. Hărți de hazard și hărți de risc la inundații .................................................................. 59 2.7. Indicatori statistici ....................................................................................................... 63 Cap. 3: Descrierea obiectivelor
    [Show full text]