OPENING REMARKS BY COMMISSIONER STAMM at the SAN DIEGO PROGRAM CONFERENCE August 2, 1976
LA-DIeS ..;- GeNT E 1'; It is a pleasure to welcome you to the 29th Annual /leI-1c-r- 1/cJI "d lJiU'Y1~r(ydu:e~~~ . Ph;- ~ /ZP"~~;.7'...+t.u . __ __... t 'C' .." .-'O'"~-I"~- ':. -;r~14(- U(.~"~7-W e_ This year, we me unprecedented circumstances. In J.r.,211/e;..c-.c. 3 1\ < t 1~~-:;:-;- addition to our usual problems of budget levels, program performance, 1 a/5~ and personnel ceilings, we must face up to the aftermath of the t? J' A If eCIt11 t11 excellence. Oil-tv( The Teton failure is the subject of a number of investigations, If as most of you know. These include investigations by an independent panel of nationally known engineers appointed by the Secretary of Wtft.r, \ the Interior and the Governor of Idaho ; a Departmental Task Force and" inquiries by Committees and Subcommittees of the Congress. The Ryan subcommittee of the House Government Operations Committee is holding h earings this week. We can expect additional hearings after the official investigations have been completed and the findings are in. ::;.- ~~"J.'1A /' +..fe e ;L £ .u!.-;l O'/<.-<>--{/ ,/-}-o. ~~ 5 In addition to those official investigations, we have been under severe scrutiny from media representatives, many of whom in this post-Watergate period assume it is their responsibility to uncover and publish evidence of human error, or to second-guess decisions made at a different time, under different circumstances. I J . h 11 . .,eM We h ave cooperate d comp 1 ete 1 y Wlt a lnvestlgat~ groups-- including the news media. We have opened our files on Teton in Boise and in Denver to the official investigators and to the press, and ~ have given direct answers to the hundreds of questions which~ have been asked. We have not attempted to withhold anything from anybody-.... ,~ f :'; gDod"..-~s~fl'S": We have more at stake than anyone in determining t j)r~'IJI!) as quickly as possible tne cause of the failure. Jj: , ~ A1: 8ft"'~~~_=- 1 ,I """P:8: ' " , the cause must be determined/ so that not only ~1 :::,:::::. engineering organizations the world can benefit therefrom. It is possible of course that the final report on the failure of Teton Dam may indicate a human error in judgment, design, or construction. If so, we will make whatever modifications are produce assurance that such a failure will ~ ~ , , The failure of Teton has raised numerous questions about ,, ) , I /1 ,t \. ~ re)f.Y1~~' , '~/c-::~ e ~/-t"d.r,/"I I!,;~p,.<-drt:~ ~-<··..tJ:.tt/'t(../.t." r VtlY I. ~ k., 1.." ~ ~'JC..- other - ams. Tr ditiona1 opponents of water development h ve "tte ~r:la ( ; • .j I't!~,. d "ttrJ.t.,?,» 2 seized on Teton as an excuse for stopping all dams underway, of60 all future dams, not only Reclamation's butAthose being constructed by others. Those who oppose all water development projects have been given a new weapon with which to becloud the issues, confuse the public, lobby the Congress, petition the courts. New litigation and congressional confrontations are likely--and delays in funding and construction are possible.if pet pF?Q8~lQ. Some elements of be led to believe that ~~l:O,.wj i the risks involved in outweigh the 'UtAute./-tJ-tA...-S 1:',;< ~ J-e/h>/IAC'e. J -~ ~ j)rcdtt£etd . benefits they ssp F Tjde--have been ~" lTiQiR~ for many years~ ~ ~~e ,Le~ # ' '« .f (//~~ ~ Jt'~~e-l ~."" • b L ... bep~ ctUc.Qd I / - ~ ~ .. f l ;/ '" Prior to this conference I asked our regional public affairs "\j"'A.i A. ' -~~/'ef_tt:- people to meet and discuss such problems and to come up with ~ ~ some positive suggestions. Results of their discussions will be available shortly. ~4 The many positive actions taken by Reclamation since the /\ failure of Teton have earned the respect and gratitude of many of the victims of the disaster as well as their representatives in the Congress. I would like to congratulate . Rod Vissia and ,/lA/t l fk AII.! ,... - - t.vtrr all of those who have been working wi him--sometime literally ;-eJI tY frcJ . fA. /).//7 i9' a Ilr:''''L night and day--on the rel3AAi J itatien of ~t , j !hu t44*l facilitie ~ and in preparation for the processing of claims. On June 6, 3 " .J,':'- dIVers';'>' ~ s~ f~~ (t"1 ~ " distribution facilities of 65 canal €Ji'geRi.aatwi9ft'S which served some 400,000 acres of crops not damaged by the flood were out of or !tl(l~/'I 1-0 be£ VU4 ~ 0 as ~ ~t. "'fAA,~ ~~. commissionA On J~ne 7, we had our first contractors at work "J- /tJl--tJ{et:.- ft (A. J :s' ~ repairing those facilities. By the end of June, 95 ~eFQQRt A -e",~ oJ that acreage was;; t;eQ7~ <~&£ . Today all of the lan~where I I'tPj.J II> c /~ /I~!!IH~~M~ ~ f,'~ y~ - ..$ r-~c~ ~tJ \ " crop damage was ..., ext "u~ -1;&:tzQrap 28311'1: ..t&s, irrigation -"L the President signed the appropriation bill putting us in the claims business we began handing out claim forms. More than 5,000 packets have been distributed, more than 700 claims have -/I/ ~ ~/a /141.$ been 88i pbsJ and more than 100 ., investigations have been completed . The first emergency claim, received on July 14, was paid on ~~ Now let's get on with the usual business of this QgRf@E~"""" Th:: r.~ ~ 1977 program is the largest in the Bureau's history, and to continue at an orderly pace)~ 1978 budget will need to be even larger. While these larger dollar budgets are gratifying to those of us who have lived through the lean years, we find that increased 14UIM~~" dollars have not made the problems go away. We still faceAdecisions _ ~ ~_ ~~ ~!f :;aIt ~/ elU (J I In?''C ~ ~ <- ia/ ~f - 10;:7' in light of the uncertainty of current economic conditions,)A Infla- Ie; (~ ~/'. l it r!er/ ;--en /4;< s. tion affects our estimates. Personnel ceilings §gQEHCF "ien l4:mi~tj IIrs=JJLt I I! riiJ hamper economy and efficiency. r~~~ ~~ J...:.A: ud1 ~~ ~~;In " _. _ --- ~ ~ 4~~ ~~$:72. I want to run through a number of areas beginning with our performance for the past fiscal year and moving on to an examination of our present and future program. It is distressing to~ainlreporsfthat the Bureau had a poor performance year in construction. Fifteen percent of our fiscal year 1976 funds were unspent as of ~~iMtr.tii I J tL-~) '71 We must make improved program accomplishment a major item of concern in t~ -- f iscal year. This matter should be brought to the attention of all of our employees. We simply must be more realistic in esti~a . ting the time it takes to complete ~ he various ?~~ ~J ,re.;-1I14 J ~(';-~ · ) ~ f~ -t-· jJJ.t 1A.u...c. "';') j functions such as environmenta statements, coordination with local A. A , A and Federal agencies, and repayment ~~~S~~~t;l~ effect of overly optimi ~ tic projectidrts ~ th~ activities has been ~ ~ a ~ major reason for poor program accomplishment. I need not say more about the importance of improving performance than to remind ~vl(1 , you that the Bureau's credibility with the Congress' at stake. Now turning to the budget for fiscal year 1977, we requested $746,791,000 appropriations, an increase of $105 million over ~fisca1 year 1976 request ~f $641,384,OO~ To this request Congress added $21,908,000. So we are looking at new appropriations of $768,699,000. 5 IttI Congress added six new investigations starts over the eleven we asked" for, so we have 17 new GI starts. In the Construction appropriations ~ e have four advance planning starts, five construc tion starts, and six new loan starts; all added by the Congress • ... I would like to discuss the 1978 budget. Earlier we submitted considerable data to the Department which ranged from a base program of about $870 million, with no new contracts, to a total capability of nearly $1.1 billion. We now have the Department's assignment of the budget allocation which totals $936 million. This week we will want to analyze the workload within this allocation t :JAM~tft-:L-~ • •• and appeal wherever the ~" would create sl.gnl.fl.cant problems. The breakdown of the Department's allocation was furnished to the budget people last week. There is one new ingredient to our budget work this year. The Office of Management and Budget has insisted that the construc tion schedule tota1s fior fiscal years 1979-1982/ must be within J ' the OMB established limitations for the 4 years beyond the budget. This means that when we work up the fiscal year 1978 programs, based on the allowances, the flagged actions for 1979-1982 will need to be adjusted so that the dollar totals fall within the 6 OMB limits. This could be much more than an ~~ exercise •.~ Cl/'J-/ILlv, h;.. It will set/ in advance/ the design data and award flags for new contracts for a 4-year period, and this will have a direct impact tfl1., fi ~f' (>/ ~r -r on the 1978 workload and project completion dates. ~ 1.1 A / . ,.4 • If J I J .~... ~ "n",·d.c";.. 14.. Vp Iann~ng . programs and Yresearch act~v~t~es.... The emphas~s. placed -- upon the Western Energy Expansion Appraisal Study has resulted . tJt,.J. ~f o~ ~. ~ tsf in cons iderable attention by public aftd e eftgrfl!.ss i: eft8:~ _ ist.e ~ '\ The appraisal is timely and should result in a number of definitive study proposals for energy expansion as part of the fiscal year 1978 General Investigations program. Identification and selection of new starts in the area of energy-related potentials including possible new solar and/or wind energy proposals are attributable to that study. Over 90 hydroelectric related proposals from seven regions have been evaluated. Results appear favorable to move quickly on a number of projects which exhibit high physical, economic, environmental, social, and political acceptance. We will move more cautiously on the solar-wind proposal.s which woul.d logically lead to demonstration or pilot type programs. Nevertheless, these types of proposals appear highly supportable because of Reclamation's 7 capability for providing hydro-storage in conjunction with periodic generation of energy by means of solar and wind devices, and due to o~ our access to existing transmission systems through areas with high solar and wind potential. In addition, our planning program will continue to emphasize total water management. A high priority remains within the Department/ and Reclamatio measures for conservation of water and related land resources. ~-.• Moving into ~ research activities, I am happy to report continued progress in the Atmospheric Water Resources Management Program. The High Plains experiment in spring and summer rain enhancement/ is in its third year/with field research now underway at three sites: Miles City, Montana; Goodland, Kansas; and Big Spring, Texas. The Sierra Cooperative Pilot orographic research project is in its second yearl'ith planning and preliminary field studies being coordinated with State agencies /and water user groups in California. Reclamation's Energy Research and Development Program will continue to emphasize research in geothermal technology and studies to determine the role of pumped-storage hydr generation in meeting 8 the Nation's energy needs. We are also exploring the possibilities Ell 7.> A of cooperative research with E2e Energy Research and Development Administrati~ invOlVing energy development of solar and wind resources, including the integration of these resources with hydroelectric power systems as an energy storage device and as a supplementary power source. ~ In the area of personnel management, I ~ to discuss employment ceilings, travel, average grade level of employees, and wage negotiation. First, a few words about the never-ending problem of personnel ceilings. On June 30, 1976, we had 8,457 employees in full-time ~ .~~~a:;;;;v.r-_ ~1I;'e se.~ /?7~ permanent positions. Our prescribed ceiling was 8,332., conside~ ~ the many subceilings used throughout the Bureau, this over ~ less than 2 percent is not excessively out of line. ~wever,---- 1 () II~ 1MJ-~ something happened to our "other" personnel ceiling figure >frimarily temporary) that was embarrassing. That ceiling figure is 600 and ~ our end-of-year total~ 751. Our past performance in this area had been~ so we had expected the same results this year. But in 20 days you hired 151 people which put us over the ceiling. /~l ~~9o. PI"1 . Anderson will work with you in the current fiscal year to keep the percentage of deviation to an acceptable level. year 1977 ceiling for the Bureau has been set *"-- at 8,183. This is 274 positions less than the number of employees 9 · ~~ ~ . < 1~~fP~? ;f-r 0-#7' /~ now on board. This program ~vel will require some outstanding ~ If 1 mana~ement~~ S<-L .. ~-!~ k fo.~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~- ~~~, We are urging strongly that this ceiling be raised to 8,600. We have proposed a plan which, if successful, would meet our needs from now on with fewer personnel ceiling problems. If the plan is accepted, your full cooperation is essential to make it work. sia (;: Our proposal is to establish a base ~ of 8,600 Reclamation .... _- -"--- employees that will be geared to meet any program level. Whenever the required work cannot be accomplished within the 8,600 ceiling, we would contract for the additional services. For such a plan to be effectiv ~ we must have administrative latitude to move and f reassign people/ and must have authority to contract as necessary to get the job done. If we receive the Department's approval of this proposal, we will move immediately toward its implementation. We recently analyzed employment needs in the construction 7£. -.{~-->~'/f #f4?-u..,~ tt" ~ '~f~i..u-- ~F ~. 7h-1- field. It.-Ie .Rll+&t now J:.60k to other functions. The obj ect is to identify specific job and organizational changes that will maximize utilization of every ceiling position. Travel is another area of personnel.-----. management that needs ~~ . ~ attention. Travel must be continuously monitored to be sure that it is kept in line with mission-oriented functions and requirements. Our policy is simply to allow travel that is 10 basic to maintenance, surveillance, safety, professional progress SC't -btA.~.4 c: "~d.t:£ ~,, - and i-m1tj'e d to • ;"'t but to eliminate the superfluous. . Frequently, . ~~ . ' \ ~ ~ ;t;; ~ ~~ ;::rCG the question is not "whether" but "how ~'1 We will set ceiling ~ target figures this week as guides for control. Also in the area of Personnel Hanagemen t, I ",an t to mention the President's Hay 27 memorandum on this subject, where he expressed his concern about the gradual rise in the average grade of employees. He is insisting on control of grade levels through accurate position classifications. In straight talking language, he is saying that there is a concern that some positions are overgraded. You can expect increased pressures from the Civil Service Commission, OMB, and our own staffs to review grade structures. Some new guidelines in this area will be furnished in the near future. ~ -zt ~ ~ /tN. #f.e ~ jI~ .(-; /,~ /~~/~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~'- ~~- /-z::- ~r . ~7~~~~~1 ~-Z;~~P ~ ~~~ & On negotiated wage settlements, we have established a range ~~ &. . ~ ~. a..-u~~ of 3.4 to 5 percent as our goal in wage settlements. The Washingto ~ - d<-..1... 1\ t::Z-d office will continue to work with you in arriving at reasonable 5-4fJ?;;~ wage agreements. You can help by taking an active interest in ~ . wage agreements and by supporting the wage guidelines. Reclamation's overseas program is on the upswing with increasing demands for our expertise in water resources development from the Agency for International Development, international organizations, and individual foreign countries. New requests for technical assistance received over the past few months involve Abu Dhabi, Afghanistan, Nepal, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Yemen, and Zaire. Sharing our knowledge with other countries is the Bureau's contribution to the Nation's major mission of international coopera~~ rticiPation assignments provides an unequaled opportunity benefit professionally as well as cultu!p~ y. continue ..",v,.."r"" r'''''' to look to you for assistance/ .. j..rr,,-/s taffing the temporary and ~ long-term as·' gnments, and feel that inconvenience and program is justified by the importance of developing countries. At this point, I have a few words concerning the progress of our EEO program. Despite the fact that statistics for the past two calendar years show improvement in the percentage of employment of minority groups and women, it was evident at the recent EEO conference that our record in handling complaints is not ~ good and that J there is a need for greater cooperat!,9n between Personnel and EEO. There appears to be a need for managers to obtain greater /A!t4b( !~r .. l ~ '" knowledge of the law and to develop and imp lement attitudes 1 that consider two basic objectives--effective manpower utiliza- tion and equal employment opportunity. 12 Those two goals are not mutually exclusive; they are complimentary. If we place the person best qualified in each job, regardless of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or age--if we make the most effective use of all of the talents and skills available to us--it will be much easier for us to accomplish Reclamation's multi-function mission. jJt%tl-o~- etV-4#(' I'Ik~d",- __ - -- In the budget hearings tpis F s:e- year, we and the various A '..L lvi/tie' 5 c:'S project ~ were occasionally caught in a crossfire of conflicting numbers. I am speaking about the additional budget capability on certain projects. vfuen the outside witnesses testified in late March and early April, some a£=tb-m were using - -1:4"",.,, ' I etlt?~ 'f7l',&; t ,L fo capability figures which differed from o~ data'r/ some of t eir figures had been obtained from Reclamation regional so rces. Such differences are confusing and disturbing. They need not occur if all levels keep coordinated and stay within the figures which are in total agreement with our approved and recognized capability amounts . .~ -- - .... -.~ ~.--- There will be a change in the leadership of the House Public Works appropriations subcommittee in the next Congress. Mr. Joe '" Evins, of Tennessee, will retire from the Congress at the close Ik -"'v-t' '1.7 et4--~tl,A,-(./ of this session. He has been a4' competent,f fair and a Sstaluart. rc~1 1 supporter of western water resource development ~AKe will be sorely missed. 13 As you know our purpose here this week is to conduct an intensive workshop in which the fiscal year 1977 appropriation will be reviewed with a fine toothed comb and ~ fiscal year 1978 budgetary estimates will be developed. An important purpose is to pinpoint the problems and develop workable solutions. It's also a good time to look to legislative needs. The workshop provides an excellent opportunity to surface ideas, exchange thoughts, coordinate activities, identify incon- O~ rI-o sistencie~/ and1 develop a bet ~ er basis for full understanding . (!,;..-t re $: /- ~# and coordination wit ~ Committee Staff Members. ~i'- In conclusion, I ~ to express my appreciation for your jIJdt;Q1;i) ~efforts in the past in implementing the Reclamation program-- a program which has stimulated the local and regional economy which has increased the gross national product, and which provides an ever-increasing base to support additional, permanent, employment. rlu ~f~ e. .:f/l-"cFJ ~ ?~-r;...M,tft, 7..) ., ...... t7-s!-i:7 ' ~~~~ .ad ~ (/&.,~-- ~~ J cIb---f. P~/~:'- ~~~~ a-t... '- . J t:JP LJlrf? h'r:5'/ .-1-~",~ ·1~r" /f " ~-~ . ~/ ~p~ ~ !~ ~ --; =- 14 ~~ _ / ..... ~.:;t ~- ~ Cl- tJ fn --;e;L ~l~ . ~ ) ~ ~ (J- < ~ ~ - f ~ ~~ U/;2 ri~ a6?d~~ r~ A ~ h ~ . -----.' - , J OFFICE OF TP~ SECRETARY For Release August 2, 1976 Nugent (202) 343-2920 INTERIOR TO STIFFEN REQUIREMENTS FOR INDUSTRIAL WATER CONTRACTS AT BOYSEN, YELLOWTAIL To insure that federally-developed water is used in the national interest, the Department of the Interior will allow option contracts for industrial water from Yellowtail and Boysen Reservoirs to expire, Assistant Secretary Jack Horton announced today. Boysen is in west central Wyoming and Yellowtail spans the border of Wyoming and Montana, south of Billings. The first of the present option contracts will expire in November 1977. When a company reapplies, the Government will require that the contract stipulate when, where and how the water is to be used, according to Horton. Horton outlined the Government's objectives in making this move: - To insure maximum environmental protection in the use of water - To conserve water by adopting efficiency standards - To assure beneficial use of water through diligence requirements • and specific development proposals before letting contracts - To assure the public a fair price for sales of water developed at public expense.' "We intend to see that this publicly-owned resource is put to bene ficial use in ways that are efficient, productive, and environmentally sound," said Horton. "We can't continue to allow large blocks 0:[ water to be tied up for indefinite periods and for unspecified purposes. Just as we have moved to curtail speCUlation on Fedeoral coal leasing, we have an obligation to prevent spe~ulation in Federal water. We intend to terminate the present anomaly in Federal policy whereby coal, our most abundant resource, is leased competitively and water, a scarce resource, is sold at minimum prices." .... Horton also said that, to give the States a partnership stake in resource management, Interior will offer the Governors of Wyoming and -Montana a leading role in decisions in marketing future water from these projects. "The Government will insist that any water contracted for be put to use and not held for speculative purposes," he stated. "We will require detailed plans for its development, conveyance and storage, and adoption of efficient use practices. We want plans specific enough to assure that environmental impacts are minimized. We are also going to take a hard look at industrial water pricing and will consider competitive bidding as a means of assuring fair market return for the sale of this valuable public resource." x X X X X • 2 DRAFT:CRANDALL:cd 8/4/76 RQlstice Factors Concerning the Set Aside Decision in Response to . ~ ~.~ ~ Russell Anderson's Request for-~ on the Tyzac ~oad AdlocaLiaHs: 1. There is no legal burden on Reclamation administrators to provide set aside work. The commitment is ~ responsibility ~ffirmative action. 2. To date most of this set aside work has been limited to smaller jobs where there are no identified strong competitors. In the case of the road, we feel there would be many interested bidders. 3. The Solicitor's representative advises that defense against a set aside decision would be difficult if such a decision is challenged by disappointed prospective bidders. 4. The work is estimated to cost more than $250,000 and since the project has a high proportion of water user repayment, local sponsors are strongly for offering the road for competitive bidders. this 5. We anticipate work / fallon recreation development at Soldier Creek (nonreimbursable, Section 8) of about $100,000. We plan to offer this to SBA as a set aside. Mr. Anderson does not seem interested in the type and size of job even though it does involve road work. Under the circumstances and since the advanced construction notices have already listed the Tyzac road for competitive bidding, I plan to advise Mr. Armstrong that we are not going to set this particular work aside. Before doing so, I would appreciate your reaction if you feel a difference action should be taken. CALENDAR OF EVENTS Sunday, August 1 - 6:00 - 7:00 p.m. Warm-up party - Pacific Ballroom, Section A Wednesday , August 4 - 8:00 p.m. - 9:30 p.m. ~ Hawaiian Luau Dinner (Kana Kai Club) For the Ladies: Monday, August 2 8:00 a.m. Coffee Hour (Hospitality Room) t:i//tf,/ 8:30 a.m. - 2:30 p.m. San Diego City Tour Narrated bus tour featuring such areas of San Diego as Balboa Park, Cabrillo Monument, Point Lorna, 'the Harbor, La Jolla, and Old Town. There will be time for s lwppiug in the quaint shops of Old TovJu. No host luncheon at Cafe Del Rey Mora in Balboa Parle. Tuesday, August 3 8:30 a.m. Co ffee Hour (Hospitalitv Room)d>/t:,( 9:00 a .m. - 1:00 p.m. " Tijuana Shopping Tour Wednesday, August 4 9:00 a.m. Coffee Hour (Hospitality Room) pf//&/ 9:30 - 12:00 Harbor Cru i~e - no host Historic Homes Tour - no host Thursday, August 5 8:30 a.m. Continental Breakfast (Ho spit ality Room)d11tl vp~'v -~''''''' s~ Vlv~1 ~.u \ \ \# BUREAU OF RECLAMATION SAN DIEGO PROGRAM CONFERENCE NOTES COMMISSIONER'S CONFERENCE AUGUST 2, 3, 4, & 5, 1976 Attached Conference Notes are arranged by region and the Denver Engineering & Research Center~ Notes included for each region and for the Engineering & Research Center are as follows: 1. Commissioner's Decisions 2. Tablehopping Decisions In cases where tablehopping decisions were discussed in the Commissioner's Meetings, they are included with the "Commissioner's ~e.cisions in order to alleviate redundancy. I, Bureau of Reclamation San Diego Program Conference Notes Commissioner's Conference. August 2, 3, 4, & 5, 1976 Index Region ENGINEERING & RESEARCH CENTER ...... 1 Commissioner's Decision Contracting the Safety of Dams Program •••••••••• 2 Tablehopping Decision None PACIFIC NORTHWEST 4 Commissioner's Decisions 1. Boise Project - Mountour Area Historical Site ...... ~ ...... 5 2. Teton Project - Claims Program •••••...•..••• 5 3. Negotiations with Indian Tribes at Grand Coulee •••••.•••••••••.•••••••••.•.•• 6 4. Chief Joseph Dam Project - Oroville - Tonasket Unit ...•••••..•.•••.••.•...•••••• 6 5. Rogue River Basin Project, Merlin Division ...... 6 6. Walla Walla Project, Touchet Division ...•••. 7 7. Savage Rapids Fishway Modification •..•.••.•• 7 8. Bacon Siphon & Tunnel No.2, Columbia Basin Project, Irrigation Facilities ..•••• 7 Tablehopping Decision None MID-PACIFIC 8 Commissioner's Decisions 1. Adding Powerplants at Existing Dams - Various Projects .••..••.•••••••••.•••••.•• 9 2. Central Valley Project - Auburn-Folsom South Unit ...... 10 3. CVP Construction and Rehabilitation - San Luis Unit - Appropriation and Repay ment Contract Ceilings •••••••••••••••••••• 11 i Index Region MID-PACIFIC - (Continued) Commissioner's Decisions - (Continued) 4. Management of MP Region Recreation Areas - Various Projects •••••••••••••••••••••••••• 11 5. Washoe Proj ect •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 12 6. CVP-Auburn-Folsom South Unit-Sugar Pine Dam • 13 7. Sacramento River Division ••••••••••••••••••• 14 Tablehopping Decisions 1. San Felipe Division-CVP 14 2. Auburn Unit-CVP ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 14 3. Sacramento River Division-CVP ••••••••••••••• 15 4. General Investigations •••••••••••••••••••••• 16 LO'WER COLORA.DO •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 17 Commissioner's Decisions 1. Authorization of LaVerkin Springs - CRBSCP Title II ...... 18 2. Boulder Canyon Project - Authorization of Additional Funding for Visitor Facilities • 18 3. Reauthorization of CRBSCP - Title I ••••••••• 18 4. Firm Power •••••••..•••.•••••••••••••••.••••• 19 5. Pacific Northwest-Pacific Southwest Intertie ...... 19 6. Southern Nevada 20 Tablehopping Decision None UPPER COLORADO 21 Commissioner's Decisions 1. Security at Reclamation Powerplants ••.•..••• 22 2. Effects of FY 1978 Departmental Allowances on Central Utah Project and Ute Indian Resolution of August 13, 1975 .•....••••.•• 22 3. To Seek Legislation for Ceiling Increase for Savery-Pot Hook and Fruit1ands Mesa Projects 23 4 • l~avaJ 0 Dam .•••••..•••.•.•••••••••••••••••••• 23 5. Western Colorado Water Projects ••••••••••••• 24 6. CUP-Bonneville Unit ••••••••••••••••••••••••• 24 Tablehopping Decision None ii Index Region SOUTHWEST ...... 25 Commissioner's Decisions 1. Carlsbad Project, New Mexico - R&B •••••••••• 26 2. Brantley Project •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 27 3. Nueces Project •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 27 Tablehoppi.ng Decision None UPPER MISSOURI ...... 28 Commissioner's Decisions 1. Need for Increased FY 1978 Funding Level - P-SMBP - Garrison Diversion Unit •••••••••• 29 2. Need for Increased FY 1978 Funding Level - P-SMBP - Oahe Unit •••••••••••••••••••••••• 29 3. Increased Usable Storage, Blunt Reservoir, P-5MBP - Oahe Unit •••••••••••••••••••••••• 30 4. Revised Plans and Working Relationship with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - P-SMBP - Oahe Unit and Garrision Diversion Unit •••• 30 Dickinson Unit •••••••••••••••••••••••••• 31 Garrison Diversion Unit ••••••••••••••••• 31 5. Exceeding Authorized Appropriation Ceiling, P-SMBP - Garris6.n. J)iversion Unit •••.•••••• 32 Tablehopping Decisions 1. Yellowtail Unit ••..••••.•..••••.•••••••••••• 32 2. Polecat Bench Unit ••••••••..•••••.•.•••••••• 32 LOWER MISSOURI •••••••.••..•••••••.•.•••.•••.••.••••• 33 Commissioner's Decisions 1. D&MC Program to Initiate Rehabilitation of the Leadville Drainage Tunnel in FY 1978 34 2. Colorado Big Thompson Project ••••••••••••••• 34 Tablehopping Decisions 1. Nebraska Mid-State Division ••••••••••••••••• 35 2. P-Sr1BP-Narrows Unit •••••••••••••••••.•••••••• 35 3. P-SMBP-Bostwick Diversion ••••••••••••••••••• 35 iii Index Region LOWER MISSOURI - (Continued) Tablehtipping Decisions - (Continued) 4. Colorado Big Thompson •••••••••••••••••.••••• 35 5. p-s~mp-South Platte •••••••••••••••••••••••.• 35 6. Regional Airplane ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 35 iv BUREAU OF RECLAMATION SAN DIEGO PROGRAM CONFERENCE NOTES AUGUST 2, 3, 4, & 5, 1976 ENGINEERING & RESEARCH CENTER NOTES I Regional Representatives: Acting Director, Design & Construction D. D. Duck Chief, Division of Desig~, R. S~ Saliman Aspt . C~ief, Divisipn n~ ~~sje~, H. W. Anderson Chief, Division of Planning, W. W. Reedy Program Coordination Officer, W. L. Schlicting 1 SAN DIEGO PROGRAM CONFERENCE AUGUST 2 - 5, 1976 EOeR. CENTER COMMISSIONER'S DECISIONS Contracting the ·Safety ·of Dams Program. The E&R Center indicated that under the Review of Maintenance program, sufficient latitude has been given to permit orderly conduct of the 6-year interval examinations. They felt that some of the regions, however, have not succeeded in conducting all of their 2- or 3-year interval examinations as scheduled, and numerous reconnnended corrective measures remain on the books. AdequE.te staffing and funding at the regional level should be provided to better implement this important program. The two most significant aspects of this program presented were the hydrologic investigations of 87 dams, and the seismic investigation of all Bureau dams. Accomplishment of the recommended programs for these items requires assignment of high priority and more manpower than in previous years. Any further acceleration will require assignment of a very high priority. Special investigations, such as Navajo, Twin Buttes, Helena Valley, and Angostura Dams for seepage correction are handled on a case-by-case basis. These are important safety of dams problems that are assigned priority of manpower in accordance with magnitude of the problem, and often are not programed in advance, at least for initial study. 2 E&R Center It was concluded that this is a good area to contract out the work, thereby lending credibility to the public by having an outside team investigate dam safety. 3 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION SAN DIEGO PROGRAM CONFERENCE NOTES AUGUST 2, 3, 4, & 5, 1976 PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION NOTES Regional Representatives: Regional Director, R. Vissia Regional Planning Officer, J. Mangan Regional Program Coordination Officer, Q. Quigley 4 SAN DIEGO PROGRAM CONFERENCE AUGUST 2 - 5, 1976 PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION COMMISSIONER'S DECISIONS 1. Boise Project - Montour Area Historical Site. The region reported that the Idaho State Historical Officer has recommended to the Pacific Northwest Region and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation that the entire I town of Montour be preserved as a historical site. The region believes only a few of the older buildings should be preserved. They estimated a need of $10,000 in fiscal year 1978 to initiate preservation work on these buildings which will include diking, fencing, and posting signs. It was concluded that a review of the legislative history i.e., congressional hearings etc G , is needed to determine if this is within our authority. If so, it was agreed to proceed with what is authorized. 2. Teton Project - Claims Program. As a result of the Teton Dam failure, the Pacific Northwest Region's primary role is to restore irrigation facilities and settle claims resulting from flood water damage. The region reported over 6,000 claims are expected and may involve up to $1 billion. The region's estimate, however, is nearer $400 million. The $200 million initial appropriation provided by Congress to fund the claim settlement is insufficient to cover all claims. It is anticipated an additional $200 million is needed. Mr. Hunter Spillan, Professional Staff Member of the House Public Works Appropriation Subcommittee, was available at the conference, and suggested that we submit a supplemental budget request to Congress by September 1, or the next opportunity for consideration will be next June (1977). 5 PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION (Cont.) The Washington office will prepare and submit through Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a supplemental budget request for $200 million immediately. Justification and supportive data will be furnished to the Washington office by the PN Region immediately. 3. Negotiations with Indian Tribes at Grand Coulee. The region discussed the problem of reaching an early decision on recommendations for the dis position of the Spokane and Colville Indian Tribes proposals. The issues are complex and some may require legislative action. Nonetheless the region should push for a decision. \ 4. Chief Joseph Dam Project - Oroville-Tonaske Unit. The region plans to accept contributed funds from the State of Washington to initiate advance planning work on this project prior to congressional authorization. No Federal funds would be required in fiscal year 1977 nor would the Government be committed to provide any future funds as the studies could be terminated 'whenever State funds were exhausted. Authorization is anticipated during fiscal year 1977 after which Federal funding could be requested to continue the work. It was concluded that the Congress must be advised of our action. The region should prepare the necessary backup to allow the Washington office to send letters to Congress informing them of our proposed actions after the project is authorized. 5. Rogue River Basin Project, Merlin Division. The region reported that the planning on this project indicates the primary purpose is being changed from irrigation to recreation; This is substantially different from what was 6 PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION (Cont.) projected at authorization. A decision needs to be made as to whether new authorization will be required or can the committees be advised by letter. The region will supply data and a decision will then be made on authorization. 6. Walla Walla Project, Touchet Division. The Commissioner concurred with the tablehopping decision not to initiate any post Definite Plan Report (DPR) work on Touchet until Congress has provided construction funds. 7. Savage Rapids Fishway Modification. In the studies of this problem, the region has discovered that the fish screen needed to be replaced. This was not originally planned and it now appears that there may not be sufficient authorization. The region was asked to review the law to see if the work could be done under the current legislation. A decision was made to proceed with the authorized plan and go back later for new legislation to cover added needs if this proves necessary. 8. Bacon Siphon & Tunnel No.2, Columbia Basin Project, Irrigation Facilities. The region conveyed the State of Washington's desire to provide "front end" money for this work. Acceptance of the State's money creates an excess of Federal funds in fiscal year 1977. It was concluded that we should accept whatever the State wishes to advance but no action would be taken at present to transfer the excess Federal tunds to another project. This decision is to be reviewed later and may be modified if conditions so warrant. 7 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION SAN DIEGO PROGRAM CONFERENCE NOTES AUGUST 2, 3, 4, & 5, 1976 MID-PACIFIC REGION NOTES Regional Repres~ntatives: Regional Director, B. E. Martin Regional Planning Officer, J. E. Cook Regional Program Coordination Officer, J. Q. Neal .8 SAN DIEGO PROGRAM CONFERENCE AUGUST 2 - 5, 1976 MID-PACIFIC REGION COMMISSIONER'S DECISIONS 1. Adding Powerplants at Existing Dams - Various Projects The Region supports the position that many dams in northern California offer potential hydroelectric power development through building new powerplants or enlarging existing facilities. The region plans to study two sites in FY 1977. They are MOnticello-Solano Project, and Stampede Powerplant on the Washoe Project. Friant and Whiskeytown- Central Valley Project (CVP) are new starts in the FY 1978 G.I. program. The region indicated that the Central Valley Project is committed by contract to supply the power required to s~rve a preference customer load to the year 2004. These contractual commitments were made at the time the Pacific Northwest-Pacific Southwest Intertie was authorized and surplus power from the northwest was expected to be available. Current power use projections indicate that: (1) Surplus northwest power will be very limited in the future, and (2) the CVP will be short of meeting contractual commitment by 20 billion kilowatt-hours. Development of powerplants at these existing dams would reduce this shortage by as much as 20 percent. The State of California, Solano Irrigation District, and Truckee-Donner Public Utility District (TDPUD) are prepared now to initiate programs that will lead to the construction of Monticello and Stampede Powerplants to meet their own needs. Funds will be reprogramed in FY 1977 for the region to begin studies and other preconstruct ion work on these two plants. '9 2. Central Valley Project - Auburn-Folsom South Unit. The region indicated that additional authorization on the Auburn-Folsom South Unit is needed to provide additional appropriation ceiling required to complete the project. This unit was authorized in 1965 at $425,000,000. Price indexing and general legislation increases bring the authorized total to $981,552,000. However, current estimates indicate additional appropriation ceiling of nearly $150 million is required to complete the project as currently planned. Following the 1975 earthquake at Oroville, new earthquake studies were undertaken of Auburn Dam. Study findings, due about November 1, 1976, may result in design changes, delay in the January 1977 specifications issuance date, and increased costs. Auburn Powerplant is authorized for construction to an initial capacity of 300 megawatts with provision for enlargement to an ultimate capacity of 750 megawatts. Studies show that construction to ultimate size initially is the most economical plan of development, and the additional power generated would help fill an existing need. The EIS should be reviewed to insure that it covers the larger powerplants. Reauthorization of the Auburn-Folsom South Unit to provide for additional appropriation ceiling will be pursued as soon as new estimates on the dam are completed. Consideration should be given also to requesting authorization of additional capacity on Auburn powerplant in ceiling legislation. 10 A decision was made to delay the Auburn Dam Visitor Center at least until after the final dam design is underway. 3. CVP Construction and Rehabilitation - San Luis Unit - Appropriation and Repayment Contract Ceilings. The region reported that there are two essential actions necessary to continue construction of the San Luis Unit distribution and drainage systems. A repayment contract to exceed a cost of $157,048,000 for Westlands Water District distribution and drainage system is needed. Negotiations toward an amended repayment contract with Westlands have been underway continuously since 1970. Drilling new wells is included in the draft amendatory contract. Authorization to exceed the appropriation limit of $192,650,000 in P.L. 86-488 for San Luis Unit distribution and drainage systems is also needed. Drilling of new wells for integration into the distribution systems should also be included in the new authorization. It was agreed that we should seek an increase in the appropriation ceiling through proper channels. A question developed as to whether San Luis drain is a part of the $192,650,000. The region will get the Solicitor's opinion on this point. Progress with the State is being made relative to discharge point for the San Luis drain. The drain will not be extended until agreement is reached. There is no need to change the aporooriation bill language. 4. Management of MP Region Recreation Areas - Various Projects. The region's presentation indicates that there is a growing demand for water based recreation in the region, while local agences are unable financially 11 to properly manage all of the Bureau facilities. Of 57 identified recreation areas in Mid-Pacific Region, 48 are administered by other entities. The region has been unable to locate non-Federal public agencies interested in assuming the recrea tion management responsibili- ties for the remaining nine areas. The region presented six areas for consideration. They are Lake Berryessa; New Melones; Red Bluff Diversion Dam; Folsom South Canal; East Park and Stony Gorge Reservoirs. The Solicitor has determined that the Bureau does have the authority to operate the facilities. However, the Bureau of Land Management has suggested that it operate the New Melones facilities. It was concluded that Mid-Pacific Region will assume the recreation and management responsi- bility, consistent with Bureau authority, and budgetary limitations. 5. Washoe Project. The region indicated that it has exceeded the authorized appropriation ceiling for fish and wildlife facilities . It was decided that we should not put any more funds f or construction for this item pending completion of the " Fish and Wildlife studies now underway. . - " In the meantime, we should notify the appropriation committees of this problem. Background information should be provided in budget data explaining why we a r e operating over ceiling. It was also decided that reauthorization legislation should be requested to cover the increase in the authorization nonreimbursable appropriation for fish and wildlife. The region will prepare a dra ft lette r for sendi ng to appropria t ion committees to let them know of the problem, bring out that this work was started as a congressional write-in. Our letter would cover background information on Marble Bluff congressional write-in. 12 6. CVP - Auburn Unit - Sugar Pine Dam. The region reported in its presentation that the community of Foresthill has made request to Congressman Johnson and the Bureau to accelerate the construction of Sugar Pine facilities. The Foresthill community has had serious water problems for the past 5 years. They indicated it has worsened by the current drought. The region recommended that in order to be responsive to the urgent water needs of Foresthill, authority be granted to the region to use fiscal year 1977 Auburn-Folsom South Unit construction funds to accelerate the construction on Sugar Pine Dam, Reservoir, and a 3 mile segment of the conveyance system. Up until this time, the district has been able to supply the community with water and take care of the expansion needs. A 40 acre-foot regulating reservoir was constructed in 1975 by the Bureau and is a part of the district system. However, present water sources are such that the district is unable to fill and use the reservoir due to the terrific loss to evaporationo The district has been trying to stretch its present sources, and with the addition of some smaller, temporary sources, has been able to keep the community served. However, under another drought year this would no longer be possible. If the current dry weather should continue, the water situation at Foresthi.ll will become increasingly more critical with each passing year. 13 CVP-Auburn-Fo1som Unit - Sugar Pine Dam (Cont.) Early construction of 3 miles of pipeline from the existing 40 acre-foot regulating reservoir to Shirttail Canyon would alleviate Foresthill's water problems in 1978 and until Sugar Pine Dam is completed and in operation. Acceleration of construction start from fiscal year 1978 to fiscal year 1977 on Sugar Pine Dam will advance storage availability by essentially 1 full year. Needed resources are available to carry out accelerated schedule if authority to redirect funds and proceed with construction can be obtained from the Congress. The Regional office will furnish a draft letter and supporting data to the Commissioner's staff addressed to the appropriation committees notifying the Congress of the Bureau's intention to reprogram fiscal year 1977 funds to do the job o 7. Sacramento River Division. Discussion centered on need to obtain additional authorization to extend Tehama-Colusa Canal. The region will obtain Solicitor's opinion on this addition. Tablehopping Decisions 1. San Felipe Division - CVP A decision was made to cancell bid opening for construction of Pacheco Tunnel scheduled July 1977 due to delays caused by EIS law suit. 2. Auburn Unit - CVP (a) Foresthill Divide Facility (1) To issue Sugar Pine Dam metric specifications in January 1977. 14 MID-PACIFIC REGION - (~ontinued) Tablehopping Decisions - (Continued) (b) Auburn Dam and Reservoir and Powerplant (1) Specifications rescheduled to be issued 6 months later, in July 1977. (2) No changes in financing of the prime contract were needed, pending outcome of seismic study and review by consultant board. (3) Request reauthorization to raise ceiling and increase powerp1ant capacity to 750 MW after seismicity studies and new estimates for the dam and appurtenances are completed. (4) Region will write a letter to the Commissioner, suggesting meeting of Washington, Denver, and Regional staffs to work out details of exhibits for visitor center. 3. Sacramento River Division - CVP (a) Red Bluff Interpretive Center Without recreation facilities, E&R Center agreed the Interpretive Center specifications can be issued in September 1977 - with recreation, November 1977. ' , ( U) n.ed(;il 0, J:"eilarua-~olusa Canal, will be scheduled for award late in FY 1978, to permit flexibility in the use of our funds. 15 MID-PACIFIC REGION - (Continued) Tab.1ehopping Decisions - (Continued) (c) Red Bluff Fish Facilities (1) A Red Bluff Fishway Diffuser system will be installed at the diversion dam fish ladder at an estimated cost of $170,000. (2) Perforated plate screening systems will be designed and installed in the Tehama-Colusa Canal fish diverter at an estimated cost of $150,000. Because these installations are considered necessary to facility operat i ons, funds will be made available from other CVP sources. 4. General Investigations (a) Additional Delta Support Studies funding up to $100,000 will be made available within reprograming authority of the Washington office. (b) During FY 1977, $20,000 will be added for studies on completed projects to initiate preparation of a Special Report in support of early legislation to authorize construction 6f power genera- tion facilities at Monticello Dam in the Solano Project. 16 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION SAN DIEGO PROGRAM CONFERENCE NOTES AUGUST 2, ·3, 4, & 5, 1976 LOWER COLORADO REGION NOTES Regional Representatives: Regional Director, M. Lopez Regional Planning Officer, M. K. Fulcher Regionai irogram voora~nation uiiicer, W. R. Stearman 17 SAN DIEGO PROGRAM CONFERENCE AUGUST 2-5, 1976 LOWER COLORADO REGION COMMISSIONER'S DECISIONS 1. Authorization of LaVerkin Springs - CRBSCP - Title II. The region proposed that LaVerkin Springs Unit be authorized in fiscal year 1978. It is one of the units needed to control salinity in the lower Colorado River and help improve the quality of water delivered to Mexico. The estimated capital cost is $28 million with an annual operation and maintenance cost of about $3 million. It was concluded that LaVerkin Springs Unit would be proposed for authorization in fiscal year 1978. 2. Boulder Canyon Project - Authorization of Additional Funding for Visitor Facilities. The region presented a need for funding the development of visitors' parking, bridge and highway crossing facilities at Hoover Dam. In order to fund this work the appropriation ceiling limitation of $165 million will have to be raised. The estimated cost of this work is $22 million. In addition, consideration should be given to the construction of a bridge. The region is required to furnish the Commissioner a cost analysis before a decision is made on this issue and to what authorization to seek. 3. Reauthorization of CRBSCP - Title I. The region raised the question "when should additional ceiling authorization be sought" on this project. Current estimate of total appropriation required for completion is 18 $316,041,000 or $78,057,000 above the authorized amount, including cost. It was decided that firmer information is needed relative to the TEe before a decision is made. A decision on additional authori zation would probably be made in the fiscal year 1979 budget cycle but prior to making a commitment that would extend costs above the ceiling. 4. Firm Power. The region proposes that it be allowed to participate in the Sundesert Nuclear Plant planning and feasibility studies. The Bureau can become a part of these studies at an estimated cost of $775,000, which will also assure a 3 percent participation option in any resulting plant. It was also pointed out that direct participa tion in a nuclear power supply system would be the most economical way to meet the desalter power load. The region was given permission to pursue this course of action. 5. Pacific Northwest - Pacific Southwest Intertie. The region indicated that a minimum of $1,200,000 is needed in fiscal year 1978 to establish a project office to provide data for issuance of specifica tions and award of contracts in fiscal year 1919 for converter terminal equipment to assure an in-service date of January 1, 1984. It was noted that the Bonneville Power Administration has indicated to the region a wil1iness to finance the construction of the project office. It was concluded that the region could go ahead with studies as proposed, with $500,000 additional authorized in the fiscal year 1978 19 budget. A question developed as to authorization to extend the Intertie to Phoenix. The region will supply data on this point. 6. Southern Nevada. The region indicated that the State of Nevada will contribute funds ($21,781,000) for the cost of constructing the second phase of this project, thus keeping the appropriation require ment within the authorized ceiling. 20 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION SAN DIEGO PROGRAM CONFERENCE NOTES AUGUST 2, 3, 4, & 5, 1976 UPPER COLORADO REGION NOTES Regional Representatives: Regional Director, D. L. Crandall Regional Planning Officer, H. L. Noble Regional Program Coordination Officer, D. Hogg 21 SAN DIEGO PROGRAM CONFERENCE AUGUST 2 - 5, 1976 ' UPPER COLORADO REGION COMMISSIONER'S DECISION 1. Security at Reclamation Powerplants. The region summarized the security situation at Flaming Gorge Powerp1ant. It was pointed out that there has been some breakage and destruction of Federal property. The security operating procedures are currently posted so anyone can read themo The region feels that they should be posted in restricted ~ areas only. This issue is brought to the attention of the Commissioner in light of a recent congressional inquiry regarding a tourist's reaction to the Bureau's security po1icyo The basic question is "are existing security procedures adequate or should a new policy be adopted?" It was concluded that this subject will be discussed at the Regional Directors' meeting. 2. Effects of FY 1978 Departmental Allowances on Central Utah Project and Ute Indian Resolution of August 13, 1975. The region pointed out the commitment the Department has made to the Ute Indians in spite of the Administration's no-new-start policy in fiscal year 19780 The Secretary of Interior agreed to ilnplement, immediately, points 1, 2, 5, and 12 of the Ute Indian Resolution (75-217) which was signed in 1975. The resolution states that proration delivery of water to non-Indians must precede or be concurrent with the delivery of water to non-Indians. The non-new-start policy does not allow construction to proceed on Unitah or Upa1co Units as required by the resolution . . 22 UPPER COLORADO REGION (cont .) The no-new-start policy will be in evidence when the Bureau submits its report to BIA in September. This report will reflect fiscal year 1978 program data. It was concluded that the Washington office should review the requirements for this report very carefully. 3. To Seek Legislation for Ceiling Increase for Savery~Pot Hook and Fruitland Mesa Projects. The region points out the need to request an increase in the project appropriation ceiling . The appropriation ceiling, as indexed, is now $99.5 million and total commitments for work underway through fiscal year 1978 will be approximately $99 million. Additional ceiling authorization will be requested before additional work is undertaken. The lead for this action will be in the Washington office, code 700, with the region providing the the necessary supporting data. Concluded that we need to seek the authorization ceiling change. 4. Navajo Dam. The E&R Center has recommended a grouting program at Navajo Dam to eliminate the seepage that has been occurring since construction has been completed. Both abutments of the dam pass seepage totaling 2.5 to 3 cubic feet per second (ft 3/s). ' Totai flow is very slowly increasing although no hazard to dam is apparent nor anticipated to develop in foreseeable future. Total estimated cost of gr-outing program is $2 million. Program should be undertaken in, fiscal year 1977. The region will review programs to identify available funds and will make recommendations to the Washington office. 23 UPPER COLORADO REGION (cont.) 5. Western Colorado Water Projects. In view of the recent show of s'trong support for the projects and the negative reaction towards the Bureau's past effort to get this project under construction, it was agreed that all stope be pulled in order to expedite construction in FY 1977. 6. CUP - Bonneville Unit - No announcements should be made about proceeding with Stillwater Tunne1 ,:t>ecause of the existing law suit. Contract award may be delayed until later in the year. \ 24 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION SAN DIEGO PROGRAM CONFERENCE NOTES AUGUST 2, 3, 4, & 5, 1976 SOUTHWEST REGION NOTES Regional Representatives: Regional Director, J. A. Bradley Regional Planning Officer, G. C. Bailey Regional Program Coordination Officer, D. H. Wynia 25 SAN DIEGO PRCGRAM CONFERENCE AUGUST 2 - 5, 1976 SOUTHWEST REGION COMMISSIONER'S DECISIONS 1. Carlsbad Project, New Mexico . ~ ··R&B. A FY "1978 budget request of $300,000 was approved to continue the R&B program on the Carlsbad Project, New Mexico. The water supply from the Pecos River drainage area and from Avalon, McMillan, and Sumner Reservoirs for the Carlsbad Project has historically been somewhat .meager. Efforts to conserve water and improve the efficiency in the use of water have been of prime importance. Seepage from canals and laterals has been high, and erosion problems in steep earth laterals have developed. .. To alleviate the above problems, a R&B contract was executed on May 21, 1969, with the Carlsbad Irrigation District for $4,000,000. Actual work began in October 1969, and funes covered by the present contract will be fully expended during the transition quarter. About 80 miles of laterals have been lined with funds made available under the existing contract. The district has requested consideration of an extension of the program for $2,000,000 over a 5-year period. This extension will allow lining of additional canals and laterals not previously planned and those eliminated from the origin£l plan because of inflationary trends. A R&B report and draft of contract will be prepared and forwarded to the Commissioner's Office for review and required notification of appropriation committees this .fall. 26 2. Brantley Project. The region reported that pecause of change in dam axis the issuing of specification and contract award will be delayed at least 7 months. 3. Nueces Project. The region reported that the project is on schedule, however, there is a possibility of a law suit on fish and wildlife mitigation. 27 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION SAN DIEGO PROGRAM CONFERENCE NOTES AUGUST 2, 3, 4, & 5, 1976 UPPER MISSOURI REGION NOTES Regional Representatives: ~egional Director, R. L. McPhail Regional Planning Engineer, P. Q. Gibbs Regional Program Coordination Officer, L. K. Bressler 28 SAN DIEGO PROGRAM CONFERENCE AUGUST 2-5, 1976 UPPER MISSOURI REGION COMMISSIONER'S DECISIONS 1. Need for Increased Fiscal Year 1978 Funding Level - P-SMBP Garrison Diversion Unit. The region indicated that it would like to increase its annual funding level for this project to $30 - $35 million in order to keep pace with inflation. The fiscal year 1978 funding level is $25 million. After a lengthy discussion, it was concluded that the region would continue at the fiscal year 1978 level and the Bureau would seek additional capability through congressional write in. Features going beyond Lonetree Reservoir that have no effect on return flows to Canada will be included in fiscal year 1978 program. It was also agreed that construction would continue on features beyond the principal supply works including the Lonetree Reservoir as long as the return flows would not affect the Canadian waters. Fiscal year 1978 funding level of $25 million will initiate construction on Oakes pumping plant, New Rockford Canal, Oakes West Side Irrigation facilities, and Lincoln Valley Irrigation facilities. 2. Need for Increased Fiscal Year 1978 Funding Level - P-SMBP Oahe Unit. The region is requesting that its fiscal year 1978 funding level on this unit be increased from $16.7 million to $20 - $25 million annually. The region indicated that Senator McGovern recently asked the Bureau to review on-going irrigation projects in South Dakota, "to determine where additional funding might be made available to accelerate project construction with the goal of getting water on the land sooner than indicated by current time tables." 29 UPPER MISSOURI REGION (Cont.) In conclusion, it was decided to continue the project as currently planned within the $16.7 million funding level and seek additional capability through congressional write-in. 3. Increas~d Usable Storage, Blunt Rese~voir, P-SMBP Oahe Unit. Since authorization, the Oahe Conservancy Sub-district has 9rged the Bureau to provide additional flexibility on the project by lowering the outlet works on Blunt Darn and first 15 miles of Highmore Canal thus increasing active storage by 30,000 acre feet. Since this is but a minor modification and refinement in the project plan and would provide increased capability for increased storage and delivery of project water, it was agreed to bring this plan refinement to the attention of the congressional committees. The addition of a paragraph on the Project Data Sheet, PF-65 in Congressional Justifi cation submission, would be in order. 4. Revised Plans and Ho r1 Service - P-SMBP, Oahe Unit, and Garrison Diversion Unit. Oahe Unit: The region reported that subsequent research and studies recognized by the F&\~ Service have identified new biological concerns and concepts not originally considered in authorized 40,000 acre F&WL plan. Reassessment and resulting new plan by F&v~ Service envisions emphasis on restoration of small drained natural wetland complexes with earth dike Identification of possible replacement lands has been vehemently opposed by potentially affected landowners and by many staunch opponents and proponents of Oahe Unit. 30 UPPER MISSOURI REGION (Cont.) The region indicated that any actions concerning compatibility of the revised new plan with the authorizing legislation of Oahe Unit, South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks and Conservancy Sub-District will be taken up following completion and submittal of new revised plan by F&WL now expected by January 1977. Additional flexibility in project operation can be gained by lowering the outlet works in Blunt Dan. This action should be brought to the attention of Congress to make sure that they know we are making a modification in the project plan. The addition of a paragraph on the PF-65 would be in order. Dickinson Unit. Funds for initiation of construction of this unit will be included in the fiscal year 1978 program. Garrison Diversion Unit: The region stated that the working rela- tionship between Fish and Wildlife Service, the Garrison Diversion Conservancy District, local county officials, and the Bureau of Reclamation has severely deteriorated. There is a general and mounting disagreement with the objectives and method of operation '" of Fish and Wildlife Service in North Dakota. Subsequently, strongly worded resolutions have been passed by counties which advise F&\~ to cease purchasing any additional wetlands (including purchases for mitigation and enhancement in connection with Garrison Diversion Unit). UPPER MISSOURI REGION (Cont.) The F&HL is scheduled to submit a "new concept" for the mitigation and enhancement program on the unit this fall for Bureau review. The new plan, although biologically beneficial, has not been fully evaluated as to its net effect on wildlife. The region will expedite the review and coordination of final plan and seek an improved working relationship will all concerned. 5. Exceeding Authorized Appropriation Ceiling, P-SHBP Garrison Diversion Unit. In response to General Accounting Office's report on "Bureau of Reclamation's Procedures and Practices for Computing Authorized Cost Ceiling and Project Cost Estimates Need Improvement," the Bureau agreed to modify indexing procedures. As a result, the total estimated cost of Garrison as presented in the fiscal year 1978 budget exceeds the authori zation ceiling by $10.8 million. The decision was made that legislation to raise the ceiling will not be proposed until the project is further along. Tablehopping Decisions 1. Deferral of second stage grouting - Yellowtail Unit, P-SMBP. 2. Purchase of Lands for P-SMBP, Polecat Bench Unit. 32 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION SAN DIEGO PROGRAM CONFERENCE NOTES AUGUST 2, 3, 4, & 5, 1976 LOWER MISSOURI REGION NOTES Regional Representattves: Regional Director, J. D.• Hall Regional Planning Officer, R. K. Lanky Regional Program Coordination Officer, G. M. Wendler 33 SAN DIEGO PROGRAM CONFERENCE AUGUST 2 - 5, 1976 LOWER MISSOURI REGION COMMISSIONER'S DECISIONS 1. D&MC Program to Initiate Rehabilitation of the Leadville Drainage Tunnel in FY 1978. This problem was again discussed and it was determined that we could initiate construction on this project in FY 1978 under the D&MC program. The amount of $500,000 is included in our FY 1978 program documents for this program. 2. Colorado Big Thompson Project. The Commissioner agreed with the region's recommendation that an environmental impact statement on the Colorado-Big Thompson Project be prepared that would cover the combined Windy Gap-CBT project operations as well as any foreseeable modification to the East Slope facilities or project alterations. A statement should be prepared on the project impact as it now exists and not go into great lengths on historical impacts. The Commissioner asked Mr. Jonez to discuss the legal requirements of impact statements on operating projects with the Solicitor. If the law does, in fact, require statements on operating projects, he suggested that special legislation to make the costs of the statements nonreimburs able be ~~~~id~red. 34 LOWER MISSOURI REGION - (Continued) Tablehopping Decisions 1. Nebraska Mid-State Division--Expenditure of FY 1976 carryover funds of $8,000 in Transition Quarter approved to prepare summary on hydrologic studies. 2. P-SMBP - Narrows Unit--Updating cost estimate to July 1976 price level and revising program documents for 1978 budget estimate approved. 3. P-SMBP - Bostwick Division--Approved reprograming of two minor subsurface drains in lieu of canal lining to control seep damage. Costs will not be a district obligation via repayment contract. 4. Colorado Big Thompson Project--Approved Rescheduling of funds in FY 1977 O&M program. Project-wide environmental impact statement will be written to cover operating project, use of CBT facilities by Windy Gap Project and modification of east slope facilities for delivery of project water. 5. P-SMBP - South Platte Area O&M--Approved rescheduling of funds in FY 1977 to replace equipment in Beaver Creek Substation. 6. General--Approved replacement of McCook airplane in FY 1978. 35 ~ ~ f - .- ~5~A-;;~ - CO . ISSIOhR'S ~ ic CONFBRBNCB SAN DIEGO of ~ ~ i ~ IIHEAD TO 1977- ~ RECLAMATION'S 75th BIRTHDAY ~ 1976 ANNUAL PROGRAM CONFERENCE San Diego, California ROYAL INN AT THE WHARF MONDA Y, AUGUST 2 - EAST COAST ROOM 9:00 a.m. -- 10:00 a.m. PDT INTRODUCTIONS AND OPENING Assistant Commissioner D. D. Anderson, Presiding "Welcome to San Diego and Lower Colorado Region" Regional Director Manuel Lopez, Jr. Opening Remarks Commissioner G . G. Stamm Conference Details Assistant Commissioner D. D. Anderson SCHEDULE OF REGIONAL REVIEW WITH COMMISSIONER'S STAFF (Table Hopping) GENERAL CONFERENCE AREA -- EAST COAST ROOM 10:00 a.m. -- 5:00 p.m. Lunch 12:00 noon -- 1:00 p.m. 10-12 1-3 3-5 TIME AM PM PM Planning LC UC SW Engineering D&C MP LC UC Special Areas and Research* PN MP LC Water and Land LM PN MP Power UM LM PN Program Coordination SW UM LM Personnel Ceiling and Finance UC SW UM * Review time to be shared by 140, 150, 1500 * PROGRAM - MONDAY TUESDAY, AUGUST 3 GENERAL CONFERENCE AREA -- EAST COAST ROOM SCHEDULE OF REGIONAL REVIEW WITH COMMISSIONER'S STAFF (fable Hopping) 8-10 10-12 .1-3 3-5 TIME AM AM PM PM Planning UM LM PN ' MP Engineering D&C SW UM LM PN Special Areas and Research* UC SW UM LM Water and Land LC UC SW UM Power MP LC UC SW Program Coordination PN MP LC UC Personnel Ceilings and Finance LM PN MP LC *Review time to be shared by 140, 150, 1500 TUESDAY WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 4 COMMISSIONER'S CONFERENCE AREA WEST COAST ROOM SCHEDULE OF COMMISSIONER'S MEETINGS WITH REGIONS TO DISCUSS SPECIFIC PROBLEMS 8:00 -- 9:30 a.m. MP 9:30 -- 11 :00 a.m. LC 11 :00 -- 12:00 noon E&R Center 1 :00 -- 2:30 p.m. DC 2:30 -- 4:00 p.m. SW 4:00 -- 5:30 p.m. UM WEDNESDAY THURSDA Y, AUGUST 5 COMMISSIONER'S CONFERENCE AREA WEST COAST ROOM SCHEDULE OF COMMISSIONER'S MEETINGS WITH REGIONS TO DISCUSS SPECIFIC PROBLEMS 8:00 a.m. -- 9:00 a.m. Regional Directors , 9:00 a.m. -- lQ\30 a.m. LM 10:30 a.m. -- 12:00 noon PN THURSDAY, AUGUST 5 GENERAL CONFERENCE AREA EAST COAST ROOM 12:00 noon Closing remarks - All Conferees 1 :00 p.m. -- 5 :00 p.m. Begin work on program documents to reflect conference action and continue through Saturday FRIDA Y, AUGUST 6 COMMISSIONER'S CONFERENCE AREA WEST COAST ROOM 10:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. MEETING OF PROGRAM COORDINATORS THURSDAY -- FRIDAY BUREAU OF RECLAMATION OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER, WASHINGTON, D.C. G. G. Stamm, Commissioner E. F. Sullivan, Assistant Commissioner, Resource Management D. D. Anderson, Assistant Commissioner, Administration G. E. Freer, Special Assistant for Programs L. J. Hart, Chief, Office of Public Affairs A. R. Jonez, Assistant to the Commissioner - Ecology D. L. Chappelear, Chief, Division of General Engineering W. W. Wilson, Chief, Division of Program Coordination and Finance W. C. Klostermeyer, Division of Program Coordination and Finance J. M. Trent, Division of Program Coordination and Finance P. O. Hauffe, Division of Program Coordination and Finance C. I. Barrett, Chief, Division of Water and Land E. Hinds, Division of Water and Land A. D. Nielsen, Division of Water and Land R. E. White, Division of Water and Land R. E. Harman, Chief, Division of Power J. A. Braxdale, Division of Power J. D. Ellingboe, Chief, Division of Planning G. W. Fauss, Division of Planning H. F . Avery, Chief, Division of Research ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH CENTER, DENVER, COLORADO H. G. Arthur, Director of Design and Construction R. S. Saliman, Chief, Division of Design H. W. Anderson, Division of Design W. W. Reedy, Division of Planning Coordination W. L. Schlichting, Program Coordination Branch W. W. Schulz, Program Coordination Branch PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION, BOISE, IDAHO R. J. Vissia, Regional Director J. F. Mangan, Planning Officer Q. Quigley, Program Coordination Officer MID-PACIFIC REGION, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA B. E. Martin, Regional Director J. E. Cook, Planning Officer J. Q. Neal, Program Coordination Officer PARTICIPANTS LOWER COLORADO REGION, BOULDER CITY, NEVADA M. Lopez, Jr., Regional Director M. K. Fulcher, Planning ' Officer W. R. Stearman, Program Coordination Officer UPPER COLORADO REGION, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH D. L. Crandall, Regional Director H. L. Noble, Planning Officer D. B. Hogg, Program Coordination Officer SOUTHWEST REGION, AMARILLO, TEXAS J. A. Bradley, Regional Director G. C. Bailey, Planning Officer D. H. Wynia, Program Coordination Officer UPPER MISSOURI REGION, BILLINGS, MONTANA R. L. McPhail, Regional Director P. Q. Gibbs, Planning Officer L. K. Bressler, Program Coordination Officer LOWER MISSOURI REGION, DENVER, COLORADO J. D. Hall, Regional Director R. K. Lanky, Planning Officer G. M. Wendler, Program Coordination Officer CONFERENCE SERVICE STAFF-Lower Colorado Region William J . Williams, Conference Facilities Coordinator William H. Beavers, Assistant Coordinator Wilbur Baur, Program Assistant Harvey W. Boyce, Computer Operator Rebecca Dalton, Conference Secretary Janis Boyd, Stenographer Charlene Dunn, Stenographer Priscilla Estes, Stenographer OFFICIAL GUESTS DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY, WASHINGTON, D.C. Dennis Sachs, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Land and Water Resources Moody R. Tidwell, Associate Solicitor, Division of Energy and Resources Ernest London, Assistant Solicitor-Water, Division of Energy and Resources ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT AND BUDGET Albert C. Camacho, Budget Analyst, Office of Budget UNITED STATES SENATE W. Proctor Jones, Professional Staff Assistant, Committee on Appropriations David Lohman, Professional Staff Member, Committee on Appropriations UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Jim T. Casey, Professional Staff Assistant, Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs Hunter L. Spillan, Staff Assistant, Committee on Appropriations George Urain, Staff Assistant, Committee on Appropriations OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Larry Logan, Examiner Reclatnation Conference and Business Offices COAST BALLROOM WEST COAST EAST COAST COMMISSIONER'S GENERAL CONFERENCE ROOM P------_ CONFERENCE ROOM (Table Hopping) PHONES COVE XEROX COMPUTER BAY RECEPTIONIST STENOGRAPHERS LAGOON FACSIMILE + LOBBY Cotntnissioners Offices Rootns 254 -255 ... 2nd floor COMMUNICATIONS Commissioner I S Headquarters (calls intended for Commissioner only) (FTS) 895-6305 (Commercial) 714-232-3757 General Conference Area (FrS) 895-6137 (Commercial) 714-232-3762 Conference Facsimile (FrS) 895-6516 Royal Inn at the Wharf 714-232-3861 CONFERENCE MAILING ADDRESS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION ROYAL INN AT THE WHARF 1355 HARBOR DRIVE SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101 FACILITIES Let us develop the resources of our land, call forth its powers, build up it institutions, promote all its great interest, and see whether we also, in our day and generation, may not perform something worthy to be remembered. -Daniel Webster Interior - Reclamation, B.C., Nev. 7-76