Rabies and Rabies Control in Wildlife: Application to National Park System Areas
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Bacterial Diseases (Field Manual of Wildlife Diseases)
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Other Publications in Zoonotics and Wildlife Disease Wildlife Disease and Zoonotics December 1999 Bacterial Diseases (Field Manual of Wildlife Diseases) Milton Friend Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zoonoticspub Part of the Veterinary Infectious Diseases Commons Friend, Milton, "Bacterial Diseases (Field Manual of Wildlife Diseases)" (1999). Other Publications in Zoonotics and Wildlife Disease. 12. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zoonoticspub/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Disease and Zoonotics at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Other Publications in Zoonotics and Wildlife Disease by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Section 2 Bacterial Diseases Avian Cholera Tuberculosis Salmonellosis Chlamydiosis Mycoplasmosis Miscellaneous Bacterial Diseases Introduction to Bacterial Diseases 73 Inoculating media for culture of bacteria Photo by Phillip J. Redman Introduction to Bacterial Diseases “Consider the difference in size between some of the very tiniest and the very largest creatures on Earth. A small bacterium weighs as little as 0.00000000001 gram. A blue whale weighs about 100,000,000 grams. Yet a bacterium can kill a whale…Such is the adaptability and versatility of microorganisms as compared with humans and other so-called ‘higher’ organisms, that they will doubtless continue to colonize and alter the face of the Earth long after we and the rest of our cohabitants have left the stage forever. Microbes, not macrobes, rule the world.” (Bernard Dixon) Diseases caused by bacteria are a more common cause of whooping crane population has challenged the survival of mortality in wild birds than are those caused by viruses. -
Guide for Common Viral Diseases of Animals in Louisiana
Sampling and Testing Guide for Common Viral Diseases of Animals in Louisiana Please click on the species of interest: Cattle Deer and Small Ruminants The Louisiana Animal Swine Disease Diagnostic Horses Laboratory Dogs A service unit of the LSU School of Veterinary Medicine Adapted from Murphy, F.A., et al, Veterinary Virology, 3rd ed. Cats Academic Press, 1999. Compiled by Rob Poston Multi-species: Rabiesvirus DCN LADDL Guide for Common Viral Diseases v. B2 1 Cattle Please click on the principle system involvement Generalized viral diseases Respiratory viral diseases Enteric viral diseases Reproductive/neonatal viral diseases Viral infections affecting the skin Back to the Beginning DCN LADDL Guide for Common Viral Diseases v. B2 2 Deer and Small Ruminants Please click on the principle system involvement Generalized viral disease Respiratory viral disease Enteric viral diseases Reproductive/neonatal viral diseases Viral infections affecting the skin Back to the Beginning DCN LADDL Guide for Common Viral Diseases v. B2 3 Swine Please click on the principle system involvement Generalized viral diseases Respiratory viral diseases Enteric viral diseases Reproductive/neonatal viral diseases Viral infections affecting the skin Back to the Beginning DCN LADDL Guide for Common Viral Diseases v. B2 4 Horses Please click on the principle system involvement Generalized viral diseases Neurological viral diseases Respiratory viral diseases Enteric viral diseases Abortifacient/neonatal viral diseases Viral infections affecting the skin Back to the Beginning DCN LADDL Guide for Common Viral Diseases v. B2 5 Dogs Please click on the principle system involvement Generalized viral diseases Respiratory viral diseases Enteric viral diseases Reproductive/neonatal viral diseases Back to the Beginning DCN LADDL Guide for Common Viral Diseases v. -
L'opposizione Tra La Considerazione Morale Degli Animali E L'ecologism
Distinti principi, conseguenze messe a confronto: l’opposizione tra la considerazione morale degli animali e l’ecologismo1 Different principles, compared consequences: the opposition between moral consideration towards animals and ecologism di Oscar Horta [email protected] Traduzione italiana di Susanna Ferrario [email protected] Abstract Biocentrism is the position that considers that morally considerable entities are living beings. However, one of the objections is that if we understand that moral consideration should depend on what is valuable, we would have to conclude that the mere fact of being alive is is not what makes someone morally considerable. Ecocentrism is the position that holds that morally valuable entities are not individuals, but the ecosystems in which they live. In fact, among the positions traditionally defended as ecologists there are serious divergences. Some of them, biocentrists, in particular, can ally themselves with holistic positions such as ecocentrism on certain occasions. 1 Si ripubblica il testo per gentile concessione dell’autore. È possibile visualizzare il testo originale sul sito: https://revistas.uaa.mx/index.php/euphyia/article/view/1358. 150 Balthazar, 1, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13130/balthazar/13915 ISSN: 2724-3079 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Key-words anthropocentrism, biocentrism, ecocentrism, environmentalism, animal ethics, intervention Introduzione L’ambito di studio conosciuto come etica animale si interroga sulla considerazione morale che dovremmo rivolgere agli esseri animati non umani e sulle conseguenze pratiche di ciò. All’interno di questo campo spiccano le posizioni secondo cui tutti gli esseri senzienti devono essere oggetto di rispetto al di là della propria specie di appartenenza. -
VMC 321: Systematic Veterinary Virology Retroviridae Retro: from Latin Retro,"Backwards”
VMC 321: Systematic Veterinary Virology Retroviridae Retro: from Latin retro,"backwards” - refers to the activity of reverse RETROVIRIDAE transcriptase and the transfer of genetic information from RNA to DNA. Retroviruses Viral RNA Viral DNA Viral mRNA, genome (integrated into host genome) Reverse (retro) transfer of genetic information Usually, well adapted to their hosts Endogenous retroviruses • RNA viruses • single stranded, positive sense, enveloped, icosahedral. • Distinguished from all other RNA viruses by presence of an unusual enzyme, reverse transcriptase. Retroviruses • Retro = reversal • RNA is serving as a template for DNA synthesis. • One genera of veterinary interest • Alpharetrovirus • • Family - Retroviridae • Subfamily - Orthoretrovirinae [Ortho: from Greek orthos"straight" • Genus -. Alpharetrovirus • Genus - Betaretrovirus Family- • Genus - Gammaretrovirus • Genus - Deltaretrovirus Retroviridae • Genus - Lentivirus [ Lenti: from Latin lentus, "slow“ ]. • Genus - Epsilonretrovirus • Subfamily - Spumaretrovirinae • Genus - Spumavirus Retroviridae • Subfamily • Orthoretrovirinae • Genus • Alpharetrovirus Alpharetrovirus • Species • Avian leukosis virus(ALV) • Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) • Avian myeloblastosis virus (AMV) • Fujinami sarcoma virus (FuSV) • ALVs have been divided into 10 envelope subgroups - A , B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I & J based on • host range Avian • receptor interference patterns • neutralization by antibodies leukosis- • subgroup A to E viruses have been divided into two groups sarcoma • Noncytopathic (A, C, and E) • Cytopathic (B and D) virus (ALV) • Cytopathic ALVs can cause a transient cytotoxicity in 30- 40% of the infected cells 1. The viral envelope formed from host cell membrane; contains 72 spiked knobs. 2. These consist of a transmembrane protein TM (gp 41), which is linked to surface protein SU (gp 120) that binds to a cell receptor during infection. 3. The virion has cone-shaped, icosahedral core, Structure containing the major capsid protein 4. -
Para Influenza Virus 3 Infection in Cattle and Small Ruminants in Sudan
Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research ISSN 2311-7710 (Electronic) http://doi.org/10.5455/ javar.2016.c160 September 2016 A periodical of the Network for the Veterinarians of Bangladesh (BDvetNET) Vol 3 No 3, Pages 236-241. Original Article Para influenza virus 3 infection in cattle and small ruminants in Sudan Intisar Kamil Saeed, Yahia Hassan Ali, Khalid Mohammed Taha, Nada ElAmin Mohammed, Yasir Mehdi Nouri, Baraa Ahmed Mohammed, Osama Ishag Mohammed, Salma Bushra Elmagboul and Fahad AlTayeb AlGhazali • Received: March 24, 2016 • Revised: April 26, 2016 • Accepted: April 29, 2016 • Published Online: May 2, 2016 AFFILIATIONS ABSTRACT Intisar Saeed Objective: This study was aimed at elucidating the association between Para Yahia Ali influenza virus 3 (PIV3) and respiratory infections in domestic ruminants in Baraa Ahmed Virology Department, Veterinary Research different areas of Sudan. Institute, P.O. Box 8067, Al Amarat, Materials and methods: During 2010-2013, five hundred sixty five lung samples Khartoum, Sudan. #Current address: with signs of pneumonia were collected from cattle (n=226), sheep (n=316) and Northern Border University, Faculty of Science and Arts, Rafha, Saudi Arabia. goats (n=23) from slaughter houses in different areas in Sudan. The existence of PIV3 antigen was screened in the collected samples using ELISA and Fluorescent Khalid Taha antibody technique. PIV3 genome was detected by PCR, and sequence analysis was Atbara Veterinary Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 121 Atbara, River Nile State, conducted. Sudan. Results: Positive results were found in 29 (12.8%) cattle, 31 (9.8%) sheep and 11 (47.8%) goat samples. All the studied areas showed positive results. -
Monitoring of Activity and Spread by Using Dead Bird Surveillance in Austria, 2003–2005 S
Monitoring of activity and spread by using dead bird surveillance in Austria, 2003–2005 S. Chvala, T. Bakonyi, C. Bukovsky, T. Meister, K. Brugger, F. Rubel, N. Nowotny, H. Weissenböck To cite this version: S. Chvala, T. Bakonyi, C. Bukovsky, T. Meister, K. Brugger, et al.. Monitoring of activity and spread by using dead bird surveillance in Austria, 2003–2005. Veterinary Microbiology, Elsevier, 2007, 122 (3-4), pp.237. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.01.029. hal-00532203 HAL Id: hal-00532203 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00532203 Submitted on 4 Nov 2010 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Accepted Manuscript Title: Monitoring of Usutu Virus activity and spread by using dead bird surveillance in Austria, 2003–2005 Authors: S. Chvala, T. Bakonyi, C. Bukovsky, T. Meister, K. Brugger, F. Rubel, N. Nowotny, H. Weissenbock¨ PII: S0378-1135(07)00066-1 DOI: doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.01.029 Reference: VETMIC 3583 To appear in: VETMIC Received date: 25-10-2006 Revised date: 26-1-2007 Accepted date: 31-1-2007 Please cite this article as: Chvala, S., Bakonyi, T., Bukovsky, C., Meister, T., Brugger, K., Rubel, F., Nowotny, N., Weissenbock,¨ H., Monitoring of Usutu Virus activity and spread by using dead bird surveillance in Austria, 2003–2005, Veterinary Microbiology (2007), doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.01.029 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. -
Risk of Importing Zoonotic Diseases Through Wildlife Trade, United States Boris I
Risk of Importing Zoonotic Diseases through Wildlife Trade, United States Boris I. Pavlin, Lisa M. Schloegel, and Peter Daszak The United States is the world’s largest wildlife import- vidual animals during 2000–2004 (5). Little disease sur- er, and imported wild animals represent a potential source veillance is conducted for imported animals; quarantine is of zoonotic pathogens. Using data on mammals imported required for only wild birds, primates, and some ungulates during 2000–2005, we assessed their potential to host 27 arriving in the United States, and mandatory testing exists selected risk zoonoses and created a risk assessment for only a few diseases (psittacosis, foot and mouth dis- that could inform policy making for wildlife importation and ease, Newcastle disease, avian infl uenza). Other animals zoonotic disease surveillance. A total of 246,772 mam- mals in 190 genera (68 families) were imported. The most are typically only screened for physical signs of disease, widespread agents of risk zoonoses were rabies virus (in and pathogen testing is delegated to either the US Depart- 78 genera of mammals), Bacillus anthracis (57), Mycobac- ment of Agriculture (for livestock) or the importer (6). terium tuberculosis complex (48), Echinococcus spp. (41), The process of preimport housing and importation often and Leptospira spp. (35). Genera capable of harboring the involves keeping animals at high density and in unnatural greatest number of risk zoonoses were Canis and Felis (14 groupings of species, providing opportunities for cross- each), Rattus (13), Equus (11), and Macaca and Lepus (10 species transmission and amplifi cation of known and un- each). -
World Scientists' Warning of a Climate Emergency
Supplemental File S1 for the article “World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency” published in BioScience by William J. Ripple, Christopher Wolf, Thomas M. Newsome, Phoebe Barnard, and William R. Moomaw. Contents: List of countries with scientist signatories (page 1); List of scientist signatories (pages 1-319). List of 153 countries with scientist signatories: Albania; Algeria; American Samoa; Andorra; Argentina; Australia; Austria; Bahamas (the); Bangladesh; Barbados; Belarus; Belgium; Belize; Benin; Bolivia (Plurinational State of); Botswana; Brazil; Brunei Darussalam; Bulgaria; Burkina Faso; Cambodia; Cameroon; Canada; Cayman Islands (the); Chad; Chile; China; Colombia; Congo (the Democratic Republic of the); Congo (the); Costa Rica; Côte d’Ivoire; Croatia; Cuba; Curaçao; Cyprus; Czech Republic (the); Denmark; Dominican Republic (the); Ecuador; Egypt; El Salvador; Estonia; Ethiopia; Faroe Islands (the); Fiji; Finland; France; French Guiana; French Polynesia; Georgia; Germany; Ghana; Greece; Guam; Guatemala; Guyana; Honduras; Hong Kong; Hungary; Iceland; India; Indonesia; Iran (Islamic Republic of); Iraq; Ireland; Israel; Italy; Jamaica; Japan; Jersey; Kazakhstan; Kenya; Kiribati; Korea (the Republic of); Lao People’s Democratic Republic (the); Latvia; Lebanon; Lesotho; Liberia; Liechtenstein; Lithuania; Luxembourg; Macedonia, Republic of (the former Yugoslavia); Madagascar; Malawi; Malaysia; Mali; Malta; Martinique; Mauritius; Mexico; Micronesia (Federated States of); Moldova (the Republic of); Morocco; Mozambique; Namibia; Nepal; -
The Emerging Amphibian Fungal Disease, Chytridiomycosis: Akeyexampleoftheglobal Phenomenon of Wildlife Emerging Infectious Diseases JONATHAN E
The Emerging Amphibian Fungal Disease, Chytridiomycosis: AKeyExampleoftheGlobal Phenomenon of Wildlife Emerging Infectious Diseases JONATHAN E. KOLBY1,2 and PETER DASZAK2 1One Health Research Group, College of Public Health, Medical, and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia; 2EcoHealth Alliance, New York, NY 10001 ABSTRACT The spread of amphibian chytrid fungus, INTRODUCTION: GLOBAL Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, is associated with the emerging AMPHIBIAN DECLINE infectious wildlife disease chytridiomycosis. This fungus poses During the latter half of the 20th century, it was noticed an overwhelming threat to global amphibian biodiversity and is contributing toward population declines and extinctions that global amphibian populations had entered a state worldwide. Extremely low host-species specificity potentially of unusually rapid decline. Hundreds of species have threatens thousands of the 7,000+ amphibian species with since become categorized as “missing” or “lost,” a grow- infection, and hosts in additional classes of organisms have now ing number of which are now believed extinct (1). also been identified, including crayfish and nematode worms. Amphibians are often regarded as environmental in- Soon after the discovery of B. dendrobatidis in 1999, dicator species because of their highly permeable skin it became apparent that this pathogen was already pandemic; and biphasic life cycles, during which most species in- dozens of countries and hundreds of amphibian species had already been exposed. The timeline of B. dendrobatidis’s global habit aquatic zones as larvae and as adults become emergence still remains a mystery, as does its point of origin. semi or wholly terrestrial. This means their overall The reason why B. dendrobatidis seems to have only recently health is closely tied to that of the landscape. -
A Field Guide to Common Wildlife Diseases and Parasites in the Northwest Territories
A Field Guide to Common Wildlife Diseases and Parasites in the Northwest Territories 6TH EDITION (MARCH 2017) Introduction Although most wild animals in the NWT are healthy, diseases and parasites can occur in any wildlife population. Some of these diseases can infect people or domestic animals. It is important to regularly monitor and assess diseases in wildlife populations so we can take steps to reduce their impact on healthy animals and people. • recognize sickness in an animal before they shoot; •The identify information a disease in this or field parasite guide in should an animal help theyhunters have to: killed; • know how to protect themselves from infection; and • help wildlife agencies monitor wildlife disease and parasites. The diseases in this booklet are grouped according to where they are most often seen in the body of the Generalanimal: skin, precautions: head, liver, lungs, muscle, and general. Hunters should look for signs of sickness in animals • poor condition (weak, sluggish, thin or lame); •before swellings they shoot, or lumps, such hair as: loss, blood or discharges from the nose or mouth; or • abnormal behaviour (loss of fear of people, aggressiveness). If you shoot a sick animal: • Do not cut into diseased parts. • Wash your hands, knives and clothes in hot, soapy animal, and disinfect with a weak bleach solution. water after you finish cutting up and skinning the 2 • If meat from an infected animal can be eaten, cook meat thoroughly until it is no longer pink and juice from the meat is clear. • Do not feed parts of infected animals to dogs. -
Prioritizing Zoonotic Diseases for Multisectoral, One Health Collaboration in the United States Workshop Summary
Prioritizing Zoonotic Diseases for Multisectoral, One Health Collaboration in the United States Workshop Summary CS29887A ONE HEALTH ZOONOTIC DISEASE PRIORITIZATION WORKSHOP REPORT, UNITED STATES Photo 1. A brown bear in the forest. ii ONE HEALTH ZOONOTIC DISEASE PRIORITIZATION WORKSHOP REPORT, UNITED STATES TABLE OF CONTENTS Participating Organizations ........................................................................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Background ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 21 Workshop Methods ....................................................................................................................................................................... 30 Recommendations for Next Steps ........................................................................................................................................... 35 APPENDIX A: Overview of the One Health Zoonotic Disease Prioritization Process ................................ 39 APPENDIX B: One Health Zoonotic Disease Prioritization Workshop Participants for the United States ............................................................................................................................................................................... -
Virology Techniques
Chapter 5 - Lesson 4 Virology Techniques Introduction Virology is a field within microbiology that encom- passes the study of viruses and the diseases they cause. In the laboratory, viruses have served as useful tools to better understand cellular mechanisms. The purpose of this lesson is to provide a general overview of laboratory techniques used in the identification and study of viruses. A Brief History In the late 19th century the independent work of Dimitri Ivanofsky and Martinus Beijerinck marked the begin- This electron micrograph depicts an influenza virus ning of the field of virology. They showed that the agent particle or virion. CDC. responsible for causing a serious disease in tobacco plants, tobacco mosaic virus, was able to pass through filters known to retain bacteria and the filtrate was able to cause disease in new plants. In 1898, Friedrich Loef- fler and Paul Frosch applied the filtration criteria to a disease in cattle known as foot and mouth disease. The filtration criteria remained the standard method used to classify an agent as a virus for nearly 40 years until chemical and physical studies revealed the structural basis of viruses. These attributes have become the ba- sis of many techniques used in the field today. Background All organisms are affected by viruses because viruses are capable of infecting and causing disease in all liv- ing species. Viruses affect plants, humans, and ani- mals as well as bacteria. A virus that infects bacteria is known as a bacteriophage and is considered the Bacteriophage. CDC. Chapter 5 - Human Health: Real Life Example (Influenza) 1 most abundant biological entity on the planet.