DOCSLIB.ORG

Lawrence Katz's Ph.D. Students (Harvard Unless Otherwise Noted) Dissertation Committee Member And/Or Job Market Letter Writer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lawrence Katz's Ph.D. Students (Harvard Unless Otherwise Noted) Dissertation Committee Member And/Or Job Market Letter Writer Lawrence Katz's Ph.D. Students (Harvard unless otherwise noted) Dissertation Committee Member and/or Job Market Letter Writer Ph.D Initial Placement Current Position Year 1. Karl Iorio (UC Berkeley) 1986 Kaiser Health Foundation 2. Lori Kletzer (UC Berkeley) 1986 Williams College UC Santa Cruz (Provost and Exec. Vice Chancellor) 3. Miles Kimball 1987 University of Michigan University of Colorado, Boulder 4. Alan B. Krueger 1987 Princeton University Princeton University, 1987-2019 (Past Chair, CEA) 5. David I. Levine 1987 UC Berkeley, Haas School of Business UC Berkeley, Haas School of Business 6. David Neumark 1987 Federal Reserve Board UC Irvine 7. Robert Valletta 1987 UC Irvine Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco 8. Sanders Korenman 1988 Princeton University CUNY-Baruch College 9. Douglas Kruse 1988 Rutgers University Rutgers University 10. Fernando Ramos 1989 KPMG Peat Marwick 11. Changyong Rhee 1989 University of Rochester IMF, Director of Asia and the Pacific 12. Robert J. Waldmann 1989 European University Institute Tor Vergata University of Rome 13. Edward Funkhouser 1990 UC Santa Barbara California State University, Long Beach 14. James Montgomery (MIT) 1990 Northwestern University U. of Wisconsin, Sociology 15. Marcus Rebick 1990 Cornell University Oxford University, 1994-2012 16. Ana Revenga 1990 The World Bank The Brookings Institution 17. Eric Rice 1990 The World Bank Wellington Management 18. David N. Weil 1990 Brown University Brown University 19. David M. Cutler (MIT) 1991 Harvard University Harvard University 20. Maria Hanratty 1991 Cornell University University of Minnesota, Humphrey School 21. Jonathan Morduch 1991 Harvard University New York University 22. Andrew Warner 1991 The World Bank Millennium Challenge Corporation 23. Jonathan Gruber 1992 MIT MIT 24. Jennifer Hunt 1992 Yale University Rutgers U. (Past Chief Economist, U.S. DOL) 25.Robert Kornfeld 1992 Abt Associates U.S Department of Commerce BEA 26. Karyn Model 1992 RAND Resolution Economics 27. Cecilia Rouse 1992 Princeton University Dean, Princeton School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University (Past CEA Member) 28. Phillip Swagel 1992 Federal Reserve Board Director, Congressional Budget Office 29. Elliot Berman 1993 Boston University UC San Diego 30. Jorg Decressin 1993 International Monetary Fund International Monetary Fund 31. Rachel Friedberg (MIT) 1993 Brown University Brown University 32. William Rodgers 1993 William and Mary College Rutgers University (Past Chief Economist, DOL) 33. David Rodda 1993 Abt Associates Freddie Mac 34. Nada Eissa 1994 UC Berkeley Georgetown University 35. Judith Hellerstein 1994 Northwestern University University of Maryland 36. Steven Levitt (MIT) 1994 University of Chicago University of Chicago (Clark Medalist) 37. William Miracky (MIT) 1994 Monitor Group Monitor Group 38. Dahlia Remler 1994 Tulane University CUNY-Baruch College 39. Zadia Feliciano 1995 Queens College Queens College 40. Susan Guthrie 1995 Brattle Group GF Data 41. David C. Marè 1995 New Zealand Ministry of Labour Motu Economic and Public Policy Research 42. Suzanne Reyes 1995 Abt Associates 43. Marian Vaillant Wrobel 1995 Abt Associates Mathematica Policy Research 44. Boris Simkovich 1996 Vassar College Light Management Consulting 45. Elizabeth Brainerd 1996 Williams College Brandeis University 46. Jeffrey Liebman 1996 Harvard University, Kennedy School Harvard University, Kennedy School 47. Gadi Bar-Levy 1997 Northwestern University Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago 48. Sandra Black 1997 Federal Reserve Bank of New York Columbia University, SIPA (Past CEA Member) 49. Rajeev Dehejia 1997 University of Toronto NYU Wagner School 50. Vandy Howell 1997 Cornerstone Research Cornerstone Research 51. Katharine Baicker 1998 Dartmouth College Dean, U. of Chicago Harris School (Past CEA Member) 52. Marianne Bertrand 1998 Princeton University University of Chicago Booth School 53. John Horn 1998 Brattle Group Washington University, Olin Business School 54. Jeffrey Kling (MIT) 1998 Princeton University Associate Director, Congressional Budget Office 55. Erzo Luttmer 1998 University of Chicago, Harris School Dartmouth College 56. Sendhil Mullainathan 1998 MIT University of Chicago Booth School 57. Nuria Rodriguez Planas (BU) 1998 Federal Reserve Board Queens College, CUNY and IZA 58. John Tyler 1998 Brown University Brown University 59. David Autor 1999 MIT MIT 60. Mark Duggan 1999 University of Chicago Stanford University 61. Matthew Ellman 1999 Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona Graduate School of Economics 62. Spencer Glendon 1999 Wellington Management Wellington Management 63. Chor-Ching Goh 1999 The World Bank The World Bank 64. Illoong Kwon 1999 University of Michigan Seoul National University 65. Judith Li 1999 Harvard University 66. Ellen Meara 1999 Harvard Medical School Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health 67. Mario Centeno 2000 Bank of Portugal Minister of Finance, Portugal 68. Maya Federman 2000 Pitzer College Pitzer College 69. Richard Johnson 2000 Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City 70. Jed Kolko 2000 Forrester Research Indeed.com, Chief Economist 71. Bridget Terry Long 2000 Harvard Graduate School of Education Dean, Harvard Graduate School of Education 72. Edward Miguel 2000 UC Berkeley UC Berkeley 73. Daniele Paserman 2000 Hebrew University Boston University 74. Carolina Sanchez 2000 The World Bank The World Bank 75. Marcus Stanley 2000 Case Western Reserve University Americans for Financial Reform 76. Daniel Devroye 2000 McKinsey JP Morgan Chase 77. Mireille Jacobson 2001 UC Irvine UC Irvine 78. Alison Moranz 2001 Stanford Law School Stanford Law School 79. Alicia Sasser Modestino 2001 Mathematica Northeastern University 80. Betsey Stevenson 2001 Forrester Research University of Michigan (Past CEA Member) 81. Justin Wolfers 2001 Stanford Graduate School of Business University of Michigan 82. Stefano DellaVigna 2002 UC Berkeley UC Berkeley 83. Nora Gordon 2002 UC San Diego Georgetown University 84. Albert Monroe 2002 CNA Corporation Thomas Jefferson School of Law 85. Jessica Wolpaw Reyes 2002 Amherst College Amherst College 86. M. Elena Zoido 2002 NERA Madrid LECG, Madrid 87. Raj Chetty 2003 UC Berkeley Harvard University (Clark Medalist) 88. Cristian Pop-Eleches 2003 Columbia University Columbia University, SIPA 89. Sarah Reber 2003 UCLA Public Policy & RWJ Scholar UCLA Public Policy 90. Tara Watson 2003 Williams College Williams College 91. Dean Yang 2003 University of Michigan, Ford School University of Michigan, Ford School 92. Daniel L. Chen (MIT) 2004 Duke Law School Toulouse Institute for Advanced Study 93. Yael Hadass 2004 Schocken Publishing House Schocken Publishing House 94. Seema Jayachandran 2004 RWJ Scholar and Stanford University Northwestern University 95. Phanwadee Khananusapkul 2004 Lehman Brothers 96. Adam Looney 2004 Federal Reserve Board The Brookings Institution 97. Ofer Malamud 2004 University of Chicago, Harris School Northwestern University 98. Benjamin Olken 2004 MIT & Harvard Society of Fellows MIT 99. Gonzalo Reyes 2004 Public Pensions, Chile Office of Superintendent of Public Pensions, Chile 100. Jonah Rockoff 2004 Columbia University, GSB Columbia University, GSB 101. Nava Ashraf 2005 Harvard Business School London School of Economics 102. David Evans 2005 RAND Center for Global Development 103. Bryan Graham 2005 UC Berkeley UC Berkeley 104. Raven Saks Malloy 2005 Federal Reserve Board Federal Reserve Board 105. Jesse Shapiro 2005 University of Chicago Booth School Brown University 106. Gustavo Suarez 2005 Federal Reserve Board Federal Reserve Board 107. Abigail Waggoner Wozniak 2005 Notre Dame University Director, OIGI, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis 108. Leah Platt Boustan 2006 UCLA Princeton University 109. Carola Frydman 2006 MIT Sloan School Northwestern University, Kellogg School 110. Ioana Marinescu (LSE) 2006 University of Chicago, Harris School University of Pennsylvania, Social Policy & Practice 111. Emily Oster 2006 University of Chicago Brown University 112. Bryce Ward 2006 EconNorthwest EconNorthwest 113. Andreea Balan Cohen 2007 Tufts University 114. C. Kirabo Jackson 2007 Cornell University Northwestern University 115. Ilyana Kuziemko 2007 Princeton University Princeton University 116. Igor Barenboim 2008 Private Sector Subsecretário Administração do Rio de Janeiro 117. Elias Bruegmann 2008 Cornerstone Research Amazon 118. Hanley Chiang 2008 Mathematica Policy Research Mathematica Policy Research 119. Alexander Gelber 2008 U. of Pennsylvania, Wharton School UC San Diego 120. Lisa Kahn 2008 Yale University SOM University of Rochester 121. Oeindrila Dube 2009 NYU, Political Science University of Chicago, Harris School 122. Karthik Kalyanaraman 2009 University College London 123. Juan Saavedra 2009 RAND and University of Los Andes University of Southern California 124. Judith Scott-Clayton 2009 Columbia University, Teachers College Columbia University, Teachers College 125. Sharon Barnhardt 2010 IFMR, Chennai Indian Institute of Management - Ahmedabad (IIM-A) 126. Carlos Berdejo 2010 Loyola University Law School Loyola University Law School 127. Leonardo Bursztyn 2010 UCLA Anderson School University of Chicago 128. Matthew Chingos 2010 The Brookings Institute The Urban Institute 129. David Deming 2010 Carnegie Mellon University Harvard Kennedy School 130. Daniel Fetter 2010 Wellesley College Stanford University 131. Alex Kaufman 2010 Federal Reserve Board Federal Reserve Board 132. Jean Nahrae Lee 2010 The World Bank The World Bank 133. Omar Robles 2010 Bureau of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California Rebuilding Fund
    Welcome to the Information Forum for California Local Governments on the California Rebuilding Fund A public-private partnership supporting our small businesses Hosted by the Haas School of With Presentations by: Business, UC Berkeley Sustainable and Impact Finance Initiative Professors Laura Tyson and Adair Morse 1 The motivation of this work is to support small businesses through trusted, local community lenders in partnership with public and private sector leaders • Small businesses desperately need rebuilding capital • PPP, EIDL, and local grant/subsidized loan programs have kept the lights on • Our goal: Provide working capital loan support for rebuilding • CDFIs are the cornerstone to reach those in need • Essence of the program is to provide capital, technical assistance and credit support to enable our local CDFIs to reach those most in need • Public-private partnership to leverage State + other government/ philanthropic dollars with private capital to reach as many small businesses as possible • $50M Guarantee Facility • $250-500M Blended Facility 2 The perspective and leadership of the State of California Scott Wu Isabel Guzman 3 The economic case for small business support programs Professor Adair Morse 4 Economics 101 - Evidence: Providing access to affordable credit leads to the wellbeing of small businesses and communities Small Business Economics: Community Economics: Evidence from the Canada Small Business When small businesses sell goods Financing Program run during the 2007-2009 and services, revenues and foot economic
    [Show full text]
  • AUCTION QUOTAS with OLIGOPOLY Cambridge, MA 02138
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE CASE OF THE VANISHING REVENUES: AUCTION QUOTAS WITH OLIGOPOLY Kala Krishna Working Paper No. 2723 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 September 1988 I am grateful to the Center for International Affairs at Harvard and The World Bank for research support, to Vijay Krishna for asking the question, to Susan Collins for the title, to Kathleen Hogan and Phillip Swagel for able research assistance, and to Paul Krugman and Elhanan Helpman for access to Chapter 4 in their forthcoming book on VERs with foreign duopoly. I am also grateful to Lael Brainard for comments. Some parts of this paper were presented at the Conference on International Trade at the University of Western Ontario and to the lunch group on international economics of the NBER in the Spring of 1988. This research is part of the NBER's researchprogram in International Studies. Any opinions expressed are those of the author not those of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NEER Working Paper #2723 September 1988 THECASEOF THE VANISHING REVENUES; AUCTION QUOTAS WITH OLIGOPOLY ABSTRACT This paper examines the effects of auctioning quota licenses when market power exists. The overall conclusion is that with oligopolistic markets, quotas, even when set optimally and with quota licenses auctioned off, are - unlikelyto dominate free trade. Moreover, auction quotas only strictly dominate giving away licenses which are competitively traded if thequota is quite restrictive. When there is a foreign duopoly or oligopoly and domestic competition it is shown that such sales of licenses does not raise revenues unless they are quite restrictive.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report on Sustainable Practices
    SUSTAINABLE PRACTICES TABLE OF CONTENTS Annual Report on Sustainable Practices 2019 ANNUAL REPORT 2019 A SUSTAINABLE PRACTICES TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents A Message from the President ............................................ 1 The Campuses .................................................................. 24 UC Berkeley .................................................................................... 25 Summary: 2019 Progress Toward Policy Goals .................... 3 UC Davis ...........................................................................................29 UC Irvine ...........................................................................................33 UCLA ..................................................................................................35 2019 Awards ...................................................................... 4 UC Merced .......................................................................................41 UC Riverside ....................................................................................45 Timeline of Sustainability at UC .......................................... 5 UC San Diego ...................................................................................49 UC San Francisco ............................................................................53 UC Sustainable Practices Policies ........................................ 6 UC Santa Barbara .......................................................................... 57 Climate and Energy ..........................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • APPLICATION for GRANTS UNDER the National Resource Centers and Foreign Language and Area Studies Fellowships
    U.S. Department of Education Washington, D.C. 20202-5335 APPLICATION FOR GRANTS UNDER THE National Resource Centers and Foreign Language and Area Studies Fellowships CFDA # 84.015A PR/Award # P015A180149 Gramts.gov Tracking#: GRANT12660118 OMB No. , Expiration Date: Closing Date: Jun 25, 2018 PR/Award # P015A180149 **Table of Contents** Form Page 1. Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 e3 2. Standard Budget Sheet (ED 524) e6 3. Assurances Non-Construction Programs (SF 424B) e8 4. Disclosure Of Lobbying Activities (SF-LLL) e10 5. ED GEPA427 Form e11 Attachment - 1 (GEPA_Statement_2018) e12 6. Grants.gov Lobbying Form e13 7. Dept of Education Supplemental Information for SF-424 e14 8. ED Abstract Narrative Form e15 Attachment - 1 (NRC Abstract NYC CLAS 2018 2022) e16 9. Project Narrative Form e17 Attachment - 1 (Table of Contents NYC Consortium_1) e18 Attachment - 2 (Abbreviations Gloss NYC Consortium_1) e20 Attachment - 3 (Final Narrative NYC Consortium_1) e22 10. Other Narrative Form e82 Attachment - 1 (NRC and FLAS Applicant Profile) e83 Attachment - 2 (Divrs Persp and Areas of Natnl Need NYC Consor) e84 Attachment - 3 (Appendix 1 NRC PMFs NYC Consortium) e86 Attachment - 4 (Appendix II Project Personnel NYC Consortium) e89 Attachment - 5 (Appendix III Course List NYC Consortium) e235 Attachment - 6 (Position Descriptions NYC Consortium) e267 Attachment - 7 (Letters of Support NYC Consortium) e268 11. Budget Narrative Form e275 Attachment - 1 (Budget Detail NYC Consortium) e276 This application was generated using the PDF functionality. The PDF functionality automatically numbers the pages in this application. Some pages/sections of this application may contain 2 sets of page numbers, one set created by the applicant and the other set created by e-Application's PDF functionality.
    [Show full text]
  • Haas School of Business University of California, Berkeley S450 Student Services Building #1900 CA 94720-1900 Berkeley, • Position Themselves for a Successful Career
    A summer business boot camp for non-business majors AA summersummer businessbusiness bootboot campcamp forfor non-businessnon-business majorsmajors PAID BASE US Postage BASE Presorted Standard Are you interested in business? Systems Inc. Postal Haas School of Business Do you want to get a great job after graduation? University of California, Berkeley Complement your degree with the BASE Summer Program from the Haas School of Business at UC Berkeley. This intensive, six-week summer program is designed to teach the fundamentals of business to non-business, un- dergraduate students in arts, sciences, and engineering. Students in the BASE Summer Program • earn academic credit while developing top-notch business savvy • study at the Haas School of Business at UC Berkeley, one of the top three undergraduate business programs in the US • meet business professionals around the San Francisco Bay Area • work with students from some of the most elite universities in the US BASE Summer Program Haas School of Business University of California, Berkeley S450 Student Services Building #1900 CA 94720-1900 Berkeley, • position themselves for a successful career www.haas.berkeley.edu/Undergrad/BASE/ www.haas.berkeley.edu/Undergrad/BASE/ Comments from BASE Alumni Why BASE? Why Berkeley? “The BASE program played an instrumental role in what in- dustry I chose to pursue by providing me with a well struc- tured fi rst experience into the different fi elds of business.” Young professionals today must have the skills necessary to For over 100 years, the Haas School of Business at the Univer- -Brian Sze, Stanford University operate in increasingly complex business environments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of a Campus (1756-2006)
    CHAPTER 3 THE EVOLUTION OF A CAMPUS (1756-2006) Princeton University has always been a dynamic institution, evolving from a two-building college in a rural town to a thriving University at the heart of a busy multifaceted community. The campus changed dramatically in the last century with the introduction of iconic “collegiate gothic” architecture and significant postwar expansion. Although the campus exudes a sense of permanence and timelessness, it supports a living institution that must always grow in pace with new academic disciplines and changing student expectations. The Campus Plan anticipates an expansion of 2.1 million additional square feet over ten years, and proposes to achieve this growth while applying the Five Guiding Principles. 1906 view of Princeton University by Richard Rummel. In this view, the original train station can be seen below Blair Hall, whose archway formed a ceremonial entrance to the campus for rail travelers. The station was moved to its current location in the 1920s. In this 1875 view, with Nassau Street in the The basic pattern of the campus layout, with foreground, Princeton’s campus can be seen rows of buildings following east-west walks Campus History occupying high ground overlooking the Stony which step down the hillside, is already clear in Brook, now Lake Carnegie, and a sweeping vista this view. Although many buildings shown here Starting as a small academic enclave in a of farms and open land which has now become were demolished over time to accommodate pastoral setting, the campus has grown the Route 1 corridor of shopping malls and office growth and changing architectural tastes, and in its 250 years to span almost 400 acres.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine BOSTON
    Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine BOSTON Boston University School of Medicine, 72 East Concord Street, Boston, MA 02118-2526 PATHOLOGY SEMINARS, FALL TERM 2008 FRIDAYS, 1:45-2:45 P.M., LEONARD S. GOTTLIEB CONFERENCE ROOM L-804 REFRESHMENTS AT 1:30 P.M. SEPTEMBER 2008 TALK TITLES 19 Ronny I. Drapkin, M.D., Ph.D. "The Distal Fallopian Tube: A New Model for Dana Farber Cancer Institute Pelvic Serous Carcinogenesis" Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology 26 Devin Horton "Dexamethasone Regulation of Chemokines University of Michigan -- Graduate Student During the Progression of Acute Inflammation" Department of Pathology, Remick Lab OCTOBER 2008 3 David N. Louis, M.D. "A Genetic Mechanism of Therapeutic Harvard Medical School Resistance in Glioblastoma" Pathologist-in-Chief, Massachusetts General Hospital Benjamin Castleman Professor of Pathology, 10 Samir M. Parikh, MD "Regulators of Vascular Leak in Sepsis: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Focus on Angiopoietins." Harvard Medical School Division of Nephrology 17 Charles Lee, PhD "Our Incomplete Understanding of the Human Genome: RICS The Impact of Structural Genomic Variation to Human Health" Brigham and Womens Hospital 24 Andrew Murray, PhD "Genetic Stability: How Cells Look After Harvard University Their Chromosomes in Mitosis and Meiosis" Professor of Molecular and Cellular Biology 31 Ihnyoung Song "A Novel Role for Fanconi Anemia Pathway Boston University School of Medicine-- Graduate Student Protein FANCD2 in Cell Cycle Progression Department of Pathology, Vaziri Lab of Untransformed Primary Human Cells" Boston University School of Medicine is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. Boston University School of Medicine designates this educational activity for a maximum of one AMA PRA Category 1 Credit/so Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the actiVity.
    [Show full text]
  • Rohini Pande
    ROHINI PANDE 27 Hillhouse Avenue 203.432.3637(w) PO Box 208269 [email protected] New Haven, CT 06520-8269 https://campuspress.yale.edu/rpande EDUCATION 1999 Ph.D., Economics, London School of Economics 1995 M.Sc. in Economics, London School of Economics (Distinction) 1994 MA in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, Oxford University 1992 BA (Hons.) in Economics, St. Stephens College, Delhi University PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ACADEMIC POSITIONS 2019 – Henry J. Heinz II Professor of Economics, Yale University 2018 – 2019 Rafik Hariri Professor of International Political Economy, Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University 2006 – 2017 Mohammed Kamal Professor of Public Policy, Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University 2005 – 2006 Associate Professor of Economics, Yale University 2003 – 2005 Assistant Professor of Economics, Yale University 1999 – 2003 Assistant Professor of Economics, Columbia University VISITING POSITIONS April 2018 Ta-Chung Liu Distinguished Visitor at Becker Friedman Institute, UChicago Spring 2017 Visiting Professor of Economics, University of Pompeu Fabra and Stanford Fall 2010 Visiting Professor of Economics, London School of Economics Spring 2006 Visiting Associate Professor of Economics, University of California, Berkeley Fall 2005 Visiting Associate Professor of Economics, Columbia University 2002 – 2003 Visiting Assistant Professor of Economics, MIT CURRENT PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES AND SERVICES 2019 – Director, Economic Growth Center Yale University 2019 – Co-editor, American Economic Review: Insights 2014 – IZA
    [Show full text]
  • Why Do Women Leave Science and Engineering?
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Hunt, Jennifer Working Paper Why do women leave science and engineering? IZA Discussion Papers, No. 6885 Provided in Cooperation with: IZA – Institute of Labor Economics Suggested Citation: Hunt, Jennifer (2012) : Why do women leave science and engineering?, IZA Discussion Papers, No. 6885, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/67325 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu IZA DP No. 6885 Why Do Women Leave Science and Engineering? Jennifer Hunt September 2012 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor Why Do Women Leave Science and Engineering? Jennifer Hunt Rutgers University, NBER and IZA Discussion Paper No.
    [Show full text]
  • Princeton University Department of Intercollegiate Athletics
    PRINCETON TIGERS goprincetontigers.com Princeton University Department of Intercollegiate Athletics 2014-2015 Visiting Team Guide Princeton, New Jersey Phone: 609-258-3534 Fax: (609) 258-4477 www.goprincetontigers.com 1 PRINCETON TIGERS goprincetontigers.com Table of Contents Welcome & General Information 3 Mission Statement 4 Emergency Contact Info and Athletic Trainers 5 Coaching Staff Directory 6 Athletic Department Staff Directory 8 Athletic Communications Staff 9 Directions to Princeton University 10 Directions to Princeton University Athletic Facilities 11 Princeton University Campus Map 12 Princeton University Athletic Facilities 13 Princeton University Athletic Facilities Map 14 Transportation 15 Princeton University Department of Athletics Preferred Hotel Partners 18 Princeton University Department of Athletics Preferred Dining Partners 20 2 PRINCETON TIGERS goprincetontigers.com Welcome to Princeton! America's best minds have been visiting and meeting in the Princeton region for more than 200 years. The Princeton region offers a stimulating combination of performances by nationally and internationally acclaimed theater and musical groups, museums that address every intellectual interest, as well as modern fitness centers, gourmet restaurants, bustling malls, and sports events of every form and league. All of this can be found in a region that evolved from significant events in American history and that is known for its charming old fashioned shopping villages, monuments, and beautiful parks. As you prepare for your trip, we hope you will find this guide a useful resource. It was compiled with information to assist you with your travel plans and to make your stay in Central New Jersey even more enjoyable. Please feel free to contact members of the Princeton staff if you have any additional questions or need further assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Housing Finance Reform
    The Future of Housing Finance Reform Phillip Swagel School of Public Policy University of Maryland October 2011 1 Introduction The U.S. housing finance system failed badly in the financial crisis, leading to hundreds of billions of dollars in losses from bad loans and millions of people losing their home or still at risk of foreclosure. Reform of this system remains vital for families looking to buy homes, for investors with funds to lend, and for taxpayers who deserve a stable financial system and protection from another expensive bailout. Yet housing finance reform was largely absent from the major financial regulatory reform bill enacted in July 2010, and there has been little subsequent policy progress. In particular, the future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two government-sponsored enterprises that securitize and guarantee mortgages and that have been in conservatorship since September 2008, remains unclear and requires Congressional action. In the meantime, the United States is left with a system in which the government is involved with nearly all mortgage origination, taxpayers are left with mounting risks, and private incentives are muted. This paper proposes a reform for the U.S. housing finance system that addresses the flaws of the old system and would leave a new system that can remain effective and stable over the long term.1 The private sector would be the main supplier of capital for housing, while the U.S. government provides a secondary guarantee on conforming mortgage-backed securities (MBS). Competition plays a key role in the proposal, with multiple firms performing the securitization of eligible loans into government-backed MBS.
    [Show full text]
  • 14.770: Introduction to Political Economy
    14.770: Introduction to Political Economy Daron Acemoglu and Benjamin Olken Fall 2018. This course is intended as an introduction to field of political economy. It is the first part of the two-part sequence in political economy, along with 14.773 which will be offered in the spring. Combined the purpose of the two classes is to give you both a sense of the frontier research topics and a good command of the tools in the area. The reading list is intentionally long, to give those of you interested in the field an opportunity to dig deeper into some of the topics in this area. The lectures will cover the material with *'s in detail and also discuss the material without *'s, but in less detail. Grading: Class requirements: • Problem sets (50% of grade). You may work in groups of maximum 2 students on the problem sets, and even then each of you must hand in your own solutions. There will be approximately 5-6 problem sets in total, covering a mix of theory and empirics. • Final Exam. (40% of grade). • Class participation (10% of grade) Course Information: Professors Daron Acemoglu: [email protected] Benjamin Olken: [email protected] Teaching Assistant Mateo Montenegro: mateo [email protected] Lecture MW 10:30-12:00 (E51-376) Recitation F 12:00 - 1:00 (E51-372) 1 Collective Choices and Voting (DA, 9/6 & 9/11) These two lectures introduce some basic notions from the theory of collective choice and the basic static voting models. 1. Arrow, Kenneth J. (1951, 2nd ed., 1963).
    [Show full text]