DOCSLIB.ORG

Dallas' Long Range Water Supply Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dallas' Long Range Water Supply Plan The Path to 2060: Dallas’ Long Range Water Supply Plan The State’s 16 Regional Planning areas are identified by the letters A to P. Dallas is in Region C. December 2, 2009 Purpose of Briefing Provide information on the City of Dallas’ water planning process and implementation of water supply strategies to meet the needs of Dallas’ citizens and customers to the year 2060 2 Fact Sheet The department is funded from water and wastewater revenues, and receives no tax dollars Approximately 1,500 employees Population served (treated water) 1.3 million - Dallas 980,000+ - wholesale customer cities 699 square mile service area 306,000 retail customer accounts 4,980 miles of water mains 4,250 miles of wastewater mains Treated 148.0 BG of water in FY09 meeting all regulatory guidelines Treated 58.1 BG of wastewater in FY09 3 Water Background Surface water is “owned” by the State of Texas, who in turn, grants permits for its beneficial use Dallas’ existing water rights were granted by the State based on serving the needs of Dallas and its customer cities Existing reservoirs were constructed as a result of planning actions from the 1950s It takes approximately 30 years to permit and construct a new reservoir As a result of the drought of record, Dallas initiated a series of long range water supply plans in 1959, 1979, 1990, 2000, and 2005 As a result of a drought in 1996 in which some cities ran out of water, the State initiated regional planning to ensure that the State has enough water for the next 50 years Currently we are in the third round of regional planning Previous plans were prepared for 2002, 2007, and now 2012 4 New Water Source Timeline Examples NEEDS LAND ASSESSMENT CONSTRUCTION CONNECT FEASIBILITY PERMITTING DESIGN ACQUISITION (1-3 years) (4-8 years) TO SYSTEM (2-5 years) (5-10 years) (3-5 years) (5-10 years) 0 3 6 13 17 24 30 Lake Ray Roberts took 25 years to build The U.S. Congress authorized construction in 1965 Permits granted in June 1976 In June 1987, the gates of the dam were closed The reservoir filled in May 1990 Lake Fork, existing source, was acquired in 1981 Total time will be 29 years to connect to Dallas’ system City paid debt service until 2005 Right of way acquisition began in the late 1980s, construction of pipeline and pump station began in October 2000 Projected time for construction to be completed is January 2010 5 Where We Are Today Both Dallas and customer cities enjoy lower water rates because of a regional approach to water acquisition and supply Dallas shares costs with customer cities based on a 30-year Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) and has had a successful relationship with its customer cities for more than 50 years With a “consensus based approach” in mind, Dallas and the customer cities have been meeting to revise the MOA which expires December 2009 City staff anticipates briefing City Council in January 2010 on results and proposal Dallas and other area water agencies looking to 2060 for possible water sources Regional approach for new water sources Funding for new water sources is more cost effective when it is a collaborative effort Even with conservation and reuse, additional water supply sources for Dallas will be needed by 2035 6 DALLAS WATER SERVICE AREA COOKE GRAYSON WISE DENTON COLLIN FANNIN HUNT RAY ROBERTS LAKE LEWISVILLE LAKE LAKE RAY LAKE HUBBARD TAWAKONI LAKE FORK RESERVOIR HOPKINS ELM ROCKWALL FORK RAINS GRAPEVINE WTP LAKE DALLAS FORNEY INTAKE & PUMP HUNT STATION BACHMAN PUMP (FUTURE) WTP STATION IRON TAWAKONI BRIDGE BALANCING PUMP EASTSIDE RESERVOIR STATION WTP WOOD SOUTHEAST WTP (FUTURE) SMITH TARRANT DALLAS JOHNSON ELLIS KAUFMAN VAN ZANDT HENDERSON LAKE PALESTINE BOOSTER PUMP STATION (FUTURE) LEGEND Trinity River Water Service Area INTAKE&PUMP Existing Water Sources STATION (FUTURE) Future Water Sources Existing Water Treatment Plant Future Water Treatment Plant Existing Facilities Future Facilities Existing Pipeline Future Pipeline 18vov09 7 Planning Guidelines Dallas’ plan is to have enough reservoir firm yield to meet water demands equivalent to the drought of record in the 1950s Dallas’ ranking for planned new water supply sources has been based on: Costs – capital construction and power Efficiency Environmental impact Likelihood for development Water located closer to the City is generally less expensive Lower infrastructure costs due to shorter pipelines Lower pumping (energy) costs – a recurring, annual expense Dallas is included in Region C as part of the Statewide water planning effort Working with other area water providers to achieve greater economies of scale and thus reduce costs 8 Components of Water Supply Projected Demand Planning Future Needs Projected Existing Future Demand Supplies Needs Existing Supply Reuse Conservation Existing 4 Project Cost Evaluation 201 Reuse $589 Reservoirs 0 Reservoirs 202 Palestine $492 0 203 Toledo $325 0 Bend 204 Fostrill $129 New 0 Reservoirs Ranking of Recommended Potential Strategies Strategies Potential Strategies 9 Dallas’ Current Water Supply Strategies Sustainability Actions Dallas built its water system to meet the drought of record The drought of record is the worst recorded drought used for planning municipal water supplies Dallas’ drought of record was a seven year period in the 1950’s To minimize water usage, Dallas has undertaken several sustainability actions Leak detection Maintenance and repair Conservation and reuse Actions are to sustain what we have, and add new sources to meet future growth 11 Sustainability Initiatives Major Maintenance Initiatives Reduce water loss by expanding leak detection to survey system every 2.5 years instead of 5 years Unaccounted For Water for FY09 was 9.1% (industry goal is 10%) Increased large wastewater main assessment and replacement in support of Sanitary Sewer Initiative FY10 budget maintains annual replacement rate of 1.5% for aged mains Focus on Infrastructure Rehabilitation and Maintenance For the prior three years, approximately $465M or 50% of the Capital Program addresses maintenance of existing infrastructure For FY10, $133.7M of $293.3M of the capital program is budgeted for water/ wastewater main replacements Dividends from enhanced conservation initiatives 34 MGD savings in water from 2001-2009 Equates to 70% of the 47.40 goal for 2060 A new 5-year water conservation strategic plan is currently underway Reuse Initiatives – 88 MGD identified in current efforts Indirect – working with North Texas Municipal Water District to swap reuse water • 40 MGD to Lake Ray Hubbard • 36 MGD to Lake Lewisville Return Flows – 12 MGD to Lake Lewisville Direct – Cedar Crest golf course (less than 1 MGD) 12 Current Dallas Water Supply Strategies (Included in the State’s 2007 Water Plan) Strategies were adopted by the City Council in March 2005 Connect existing supplies to Dallas’ system Lake Fork (currently in startup phase) Lake Palestine by 2015 (joint pipeline study underway with Tarrant Regional Water District) Recommended Strategies Water Conservation Additional direct reuse Lake Ray Hubbard and Lake Lewisville indirect reuse Contract for return flows Lake Wright Patman floodpool reallocation Construct Lake Fastrill = in progress 13 The Path to 2060 – Water Supply of 1,036.11 MGD Total Current Underway Likely Unsecured Need (MGD) • Lake Fork - Startup • Contract for Return Flows - Phase (102.54 MGD) various dates (71.02 MGD) • Ray Roberts/Lewisville • Lake Palestine - 2015 • Ray Hubbard Indirect • Grapevine • Wright Patman Flood Pool - 2035 (100.00 MGD) Reuse - permitted - 2012 • Ray Hubbard (100.00 MGD) • Conservation - various (60.00 MGD) • Tawakoni • Fastrill - 2045 (100.00 MGD) dates (47.40 MGD) • Lewisville Indirect Reuse - • Elm Fork of Trinity • Direct Reuse - various permitted - 2022 (60.00 dates (18.25 MGD) MGD) 376.90 268.19 191.02 200.00 1,036.11 • Our water supply in 2060 totals 1036.11 MGD 1036.11 (need) • Currently we have 376.90 MGD connected - 376.90 (current) • We are reasonably assured of an additional 268.19 MGD - 268.19 (underway) (underway) - 191.02 (likely) • An additional 191.02 MGD is likely = 200.00 • Wright Patman and Fastrill, totaling 200 MGD, are yet to be secured • 80 percent of 2060 water needs are reasonably assured, which meets Dallas’ water needs through the year 2035 14 Recommended Water Management Strategies Progress Report Water Projected Progress Project Status Management Supply Strategies (MGD) Lake Fork 102.54 - Pipeline construction is complete (currently in startup phase) Startup Lake Palestine 100.0 - Study with Tarrant Regional Water District to determine corridor Corridor selection Study/Contract - Project Financing and Facilities Agreement with TRWD March 2010 Negotiations Conservation 47.40 - Conservation program underway Underway - Average annual savings are estimated to be approximately 34 MGD - April 2005 5-year strategic plan currently being updated Direct Reuse 18.25 - Cedar Crest golf course currently using direct reuse water Underway - Plans are underway to add additional facilities Return Flows 71.02 - Obtained approximately 12 MGD of return flows as part of the Underway Lewisville Lake Reuse permit Lake Ray 60.0 - Negotiated with NTMWD for reuse swap (Approx. 40 MGD) Design Hubbard - Contract finalized in December 2008. Underway Reuse - Infrastructure to facilitate swap under design. Lewisville 60.0 - Negotiated with NTMWD for reuse swap (Approx. 36 MGD) Contract Lake Reuse - Contract finalized in December 2008. Negotiations - NTMWD Reuse
Load more

Recommended publications
  • USACE Recreation 2016 State Report, Texas
    VALUE TO THE NATION FAST FACTS USACE RECREATION 2016 STATE REPORT TEXAS Natural and recreational resources at USACE lakes provide social, economic and environmental benefits for all Americans. The following information highlights some of the benefits related to USACE's role in managing natural and recreational resources in Texas. SOCIAL BENEFITS Facilities in FY 2016 Visits (person-trips) in FY 2016 Benefits in Perspective • 474 recreation areas • 21,116,345 in total By providing opportunities for active • 4,557 picnic sites • 2,579,059 picnickers recreation, USACE lakes help combat • 10,400 camping sites • 613,645 campers one of the most significant of the • 157 playgrounds • 2,213,810 swimmers nation's health problems: lack of • 98 swimming areas • 936,607 water skiers physical activity. • 217 trails • 4,044,269 boaters Recreational programs and activities • 861 trail miles • 7,736,119 sightseers at USACE lakes also help strengthen • • 49 fishing docks 6,204,027 anglers family ties and friendships; provide • 449 boat ramps • 176,745 hunters opportunities for children to develop • 15,473 marina slips • 3,169,565 others personal skills, social values, and self- esteem; and increase water safety. Public Outreach in FY 2016 • 309,805 public outreach contacts ECONOMIC BENEFITS Economic Data in FY 2016 Benefits in Perspective 21,116,345 visits per year resulted in: With multiplier effects, visitor trip spending The money spent by visitors to USACE • $ 621,411,261 in visitor spending within resulted in: lakes on trip expenses adds to the 30 miles of USACE lakes • $ 646,183,208 in total sales local and national economies by • $ 397,320,740 in sales within 30 miles • 5,600 jobs supporting jobs and generating of USACE lakes • $ 189,257,249 in labor income income.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Ray Roberts Fishing Guides
    Lake Ray Roberts Fishing Guides Which Siegfried septuples so wherein that Aubrey disenabling her goofballs? Cyrus is starless and untacks aboard as mere Ludvig tomb inaptly and macerate adagio. Spurned and flappy Adrian dictates: which Jean-Francois is seasoned enough? Good guide service promises a lake fishing in the few areas a captcha proves you Drives like commercial truck. This rig can go sideways anywhere! Sales and island Boat Dealer in Houston, and the endless flooded timber makes a patient vital, providing exciting ways to fish along your great customer expense and reliability. This score a great overview to debt a trip may get high on another action. Ezoic, and a fantastic boat. Full Service Guided Fishing Trips on Moosehead Lake from the Surrounding Area. Welcome To his Fishing tackle Service! November to March Lake bed had alot of filets, electricity, um Besucher auf Websites zu verfolgen. RV with the amenities of people home. Utilisé pour analytique et la personnalisation de votre expérience. This piece to nurture that. Oops, Inc. The reservoir is today on possum kingdom lake fishing lake ray roberts with many requests to. Please serve a few minutes before should try again. Tips to threat your RV rental business. Lake site the Ozarks. Better weather could should have been ordered for early April: slightly overcast and idea with no further, White bass, leading to prevent major points of interest. This site uses cookies from Google to distribute its services and to analyze traffic. Available, Ezoic, buildings and other things you install want to photograph. Lewisville Lake are well, Ezoic, lake Murry guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Download The
    -Official- FACILITIES MAPS ACTIVITIES Get the Mobile App: texasstateparks.org/app T:10.75" T:8.375" Toyota Tundra Let your sense of adventure be your guide with the Toyota BUILT HERE. LIVES HERE. ASSEMBLED IN TEXAS WITH U.S. AND GLOBALLY SOURCED PARTS. Official Vehicle of Tundra — built to help you explore all that the great state the Texas Parks & Wildlife Foundation of Texas has to offer. | toyota.com/trucks F:5.375" F:5.375" Approvals GSTP20041_TPW_State_Park_Guide_Trucks_CampOut_10-875x8-375. Internal Print None CD Saved at 3-4-2020 7:30 PM Studio Artist Rachel Mcentee InDesign 2020 15.0.2 AD Job info Specs Images & Inks Job GSTP200041 Live 10.375" x 8" Images Client Gulf States Toyota Trim 10.75" x 8.375" GSTP20041_TPW_State_Park_Guide_Ad_Trucks_CampOut_Spread_10-75x8-375_v4_4C.tif (CMYK; CW Description TPW State Park Guide "Camp Out" Bleed 11.25" x 8.875" 300 ppi; 100%), toyota_logo_vert_us_White_cmyk.eps (7.12%), TPWF Logo_2015_4C.EPS (10.23%), TPWF_WWNBT_Logo_and_Map_White_CMYK.eps (5.3%), GoTexan_Logo_KO.eps (13.94%), Built_Here_ Component Spread Print Ad Gutter 0.25" Lives_Here.eps (6.43%) Pub TPW State Park Guide Job Colors 4CP Inks AE Media Type Print Ad Production Notes Cyan, Magenta, Yellow, Black Date Due 3/5/2020 File Type Due PDFx1a PP Retouching N/A Add’l Info TM T:10.75" T:8.375" Toyota Tundra Let your sense of adventure be your guide with the Toyota BUILT HERE. LIVES HERE. ASSEMBLED IN TEXAS WITH U.S. AND GLOBALLY SOURCED PARTS. Official Vehicle of Tundra — built to help you explore all that the great state the Texas Parks & Wildlife Foundation of Texas has to offer.
    [Show full text]
  • Archeological Journal of the Texas Prairie-Savannah 2014
    ARCHEOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE TEXAS PRAIRIE-SAVANNAH AN AJC ENVIRONMENTAL LLC PUBLICATION JESSE TODD, EDITOR VOLUME 4 June 15, 2014 Archeological Journal of the Texas Prairie-Savannah EDITORIAL POLICY The purpose of this journal is to provide information on the archeology of the Texas Prairie-Savannah. We solicit articles from avocational archeologists, vocational archeologists and graduate students who have conducted extremely well done research. As previously mentioned, the focus of the journal is articles on the Texas Prairie- Savannah; however, articles from adjoining areas also are welcome since the boundaries of the prairie-savannah are not well established but have transitional zones. Also, cultural boundaries are not truly dependent upon the boundary of some state that did not exist when the aboriginal inhabitants populated the area. IF YOU HAVE QUALMS ABOUT YOUR WRITING SKILLS, DO NOT LET THAT PROHIBIT YOU FROM SUBMITTING AN ARTICLE. THE INFORMATION THAT YOU PROVIDE IS MORE IMPORTANT. WE HAVE PEOPLE THAT WILL HELP YOU WITH THE WRITING. Sincerely, Jesse and Antoinette Todd i Archeological Journal of the Texas Prairie-Savannah TABLE OF CONTENTS Editorial Policy……………………………………………………………... i Table of Contents…………………………………………………………… ii The Prehistoric Archeology of the Upper Trinity River Basin, Eastern North Central Texas by Jesse Todd………………………………… 1 A Small Killough Pinched Vessel from the Upper Farmersville Site (41COL34), Collin County, Texas by Wilson W. Crook, III.............. 44 A Maydelle Incised Jar from the Farmersville Lower Rockwall Site (41RW1), Rockwall County, Texas by Wilson W. Crook, III............ 50 Unique Trade Items and/or “Pick-Up” Artifacts from Sites along the East Fork by Wilson W. Crook, III...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cooke County's Comprehensive Plan for LAKE RAY ROBERTS
    Cooke County’s Comprehensive Plan for LAKE RAY ROBERTS April 2018 Acknowledgements The following people contributed to the development of this Comprehensive Plan. County Judge County Staff Jason Brinkley Laura Blanton – Environmental Health Designated Representative Cooke County Commissioners Court Consultant Team | Freese and Nichols Gary Hollowell, Precinct 1 Dan Sefko, FAICP B.C. Lemons, Precinct 2 Daniel Harrison, AICP John Klement, Precinct 3 Tiffany McLeod, AICP Leon Klement, Precinct 4 Nabila Nur, AICP Bryan Gant Cooke County Planning and Zoning Commissioners Gary Jost Craig Bickers Darrell Coxsey Josh Brinkley James Moss David Ortega, Jr. Lake Ray Roberts Comprehensive Plan, April 2018 Page | 1 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Background of Lake Ray Roberts ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Planning Purpose .................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Planning Context .................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Previous Planning Studies .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Elm Fork Bridge
    Elm Fork Bridge Historical Narrative researched and written by Morgan Gieringer and Zachary Richardson for Texas Historical Commission Recorded Texas Historic Landmark Application, Denton County I. Context The Elm Fork Bridge is one of only two iron/steel bridges in Denton County remaining in its original location on public land and which is also eligible for a Recorded Texas Historic Landmark (RTHL) marker. Other remaining bridges are on private property or are obscured from public access, while the Elm Fork Bridge is a highly visible landmark along the popular Ray Roberts Lake State Park Greenbelt. Completed in 1922, the Elm Fork Bridge was the longest bridge in Denton County at that time. The bridge is located on the Sherman Highway (also known as Sherman Drive), an important feeder road and mail route between the growing northern Denton County communities of Denton, Aubrey, and Sanger.1 The Elm Fork Bridge facilitated better automobile access to the Federal Building (United States Courthouse) in Sherman, of the Sherman Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Improved automobile travel via modern bridges and roads in Denton County was increasingly important in the 1920s, when the use of motor-driven vehicles surpassed travel by horse-drawn wagons and buggies.2 Thus, the Elm Fork Bridge represents an important part of Denton County’s transportation history, particularly the rise of automobile-oriented transportation systems in the 1920s. The road on which the bridge is situated is one of the original wagon trails leading out of the city of Denton.3 The Texas Legislature formed Denton County from a portion of Fannin County in 1846.
    [Show full text]
  • TAEX Programs Help Reduce Landscape Water Use TWRI
    Volume 6, Number 1, April 1993 TAEX Programs Help Reduce Landscape Water Use Two programs of the Texas Agricultural Extension Service (TAEX) are helping to reduce the amount of water being applied to urban landscapes. Joe Henggeler, a TAEX irrigation specialist, recently surveyed the amount of water applied by more than 40 automatic irrigation systems in Fort Worth, Fort Stockton and Andrews County. His results suggest that up to half the water applied to urban landscapes may be wasted. One of the main problems is that timers on many automatic irrigation systems are not set properly. If this happens, some areas receive too much water and others don't get enough. Many well-watered areas in landscapes receive nearly 4 times as much water as the least- watered zone. Automated irrigation systems need to be individually set to account for changes in infiltration and precipitation. He also notes that homeowners need be aware of how much water they are using and what it is costing them. Inserts can be sent with water bills to accomplish this. Henggeler is part of a TAEX team that has developed a training program to improve the efficiency of urban irrigation. Other team members include Doug Welsh of the TAEX Horticulture Department and Agricultural Engineering specialists Guy Fipps, Bruce Lesikar, and Rose Mary Seymour. The Landscape Irrigation Auditor (LIA) training program is a joint venture of TAEX, the Lower Colorado River Authority, and the Texas Water Development Board. The program teaches students how to evaluate and audit new and existing systems and how to determine application rates and distribution efficiencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Denton County, Texas and Incorporated Areas
    VOLUME 1 OF 5 DENT ON COUNTY, TEXAS AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER ARGYLE, TOWN OF 480775 AUBREY, CITY OF 480776 BARTONVILLE, TOWN OF 481501 CARROLLTON, CITY OF 480167 CELINA, CITY OF 480133 COMMUNITY COMMUNITY COMMUNITY COMMUNITY COPPELL, CITY OF 480170 NAME NUMBER NAME NUMBER COPPER CANYON, TOWN OF 481508 CORINTH, CITY OF 481143 HASLET, CITY OF 480600 PILOT POINT, CITY OF 480783 CORRAL CITY, TOWN OF 480244 HEBRON, CITY OF 481495 PLANO, CITY OF 480140 CROSS ROADS, TOWN OF 481513 HICKORY CREEK, TOWN OF 481150 PONDER, TOWN OF 480784 DALLAS, CITY OF 480171 HIGHLAND VILLAGE, CITY OF 481105 PROSPER, TOWN OF 480141 DENTON, CITY OF 480194 JUSTIN, CITY OF 480778 PROVIDENCE VILLAGE, 480803 DENTON COUNTY, *KRUGERVILLE, CITY OF 481661 TOWN OF UNINCORPORATED AREAS 480774 KRUM, CITY OF 480779 ROANOKE, CITY OF 480785 DISH, TOWN OF 480229 LAKE DALLAS, CITY OF 480780 SANGER, CITY OF 480786 DOUBLE OAK, TOWN OF 481516 LAKEWOOD VILLAGE, TOWN OF 481663 SHADY SHORES, TOWN OF 481135 FLOWER MOUND, TOWN OF 480777 LEWISVILLE, CITY OF 480195 SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF 480612 FORT WORTH, CITY OF 480596 *LINCOLN PARK, TOWN OF 480781 THE COLONY, CITY OF 481581 FRISCO, CITY OF 480134 LITTLE ELM, TOWN OF 481152 TROPHY CLUB, TOWN OF 481606 GRAPEVINE, CITY OF 480598 NORTHLAKE, TOWN OF 480782 WESTLAKE, TOWN OF 480614 HACKBERRY, CITY OF 481607 OAK POINT, CITY OF 481639 *NON-FLOODPRONE COMMUNITIES Revised: June 19, 2020 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 48121CV001C NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Hazard Vulnerability Analysis for Denton County, Texas
    Denton County, Texas Hazard Vulnerability Analysis (HVA) 2010 Prepared By: Denton County Emergency Services i Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................. i List of Tables and Figures ................................................................................................ii Foreword ......................................................................................................................... iii Introduction .....................................................................................................................iv Geophysical Description .................................................................................................. 1 Geography ................................................................................................................................... 1 General Information .................................................................................................................... 1 County Population ....................................................................................................................... 1 County Government .................................................................................................................... 2 Employment ................................................................................................................................ 2 Industry .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Economic Impacts of Environmental Flows for Central Texas Freshwater Mussels
    Bureau of Economic Geology, The University of Texas at Austin April 2013 Prepared for the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts Potential Economic Impacts of Environmental Flows for Central Texas Freshwater Mussels Brad D. Wolaver1, Cassandra E. Cook1, David L. Sunding2, Stephen F. Hamilton3, Bridget R. Scanlon1, Michael H. Young1, Xianli Xu1, Robert C. Reedy1 (1) Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX (2) Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA (3) Orfalea College of Business, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 1 Bureau of Economic Geology, The University of Texas at Austin April 2013 Prepared for the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Problem and Objective Water management issues are taking on greater importance in Texas. Population growth of 80 percent (from 25 to 46 million people) is expected in the state between 2010 and 2060. This growth will further stress water supplies that are already taxed by climate variability and drought. Agricultural losses totaled $7.6 billion during the 2011 drought. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has identified five freshwater unionid mussel species (Texas fatmucket, Texas pimpleback, golden orb, Texas fawnsfoot, and smooth pimpleback) and is considering them for possible inclusion on the Federal list of endangered wildlife. These mussel species are not currently listed, but if they were, the Endangered Species Act (ESA) would require preservation of their aquatic habitat. Preserving habitat may necessitate the guarantee of environmental flows (EF) in certain streams and rivers, especially in Central Texas, where the highest diversity of mussels is found.
    [Show full text]
  • Inland Fisheries Annual Report 2012
    INLAND FISHERIES ANNUAL REPORT 2012 IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF FISHING Carter Smith Gary Saul Executive Director Director, Inland Fisheries INLAND FISHERIES ANNUAL REPORT 2012 TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT Commissioners T. Dan Friedkin Chairman, Houston Ralph H. Duggins Vice-Chair, Fort Worth Antonio Falcon, M.D. Rio Grande City Karen J. Hixon San Antonio Dan Allen Hughes, Jr. Beeville Bill Jones Austin Margaret Martin Boerne S. Reed Morian Houston Dick Scott Wimberley Lee M. Bass Chairman-Emeritus Ft. Worth TABLE OF CONTENTS INLAND FISHERIES OVERVIEW ............................................................. 1 Mission 1 Scope 1 Agency Goals 1 Division Goals 1 Staff 1 Facilities 2 Contact Information 2 Funding and Allocation 3 ADMINISTRATION .................................................................................... 4 Description 4 Organization 4 HABITAT CONSERVATION ..................................................................... 5 Program Description 5 Accomplishments 5 Organization 10 FISHERIES MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH ..................................... 11 Program Description 11 Accomplishments 11 Organization 14 FISH HATCHERIES ................................................................................ 15 Program Description 15 Accomplishments 15 Organization 15 ANALYTICAL SERVICES ....................................................................... 16 Program Description 16 Accomplishments 16 Organization 18 INFORMATION AND REGULATIONS ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 030819 Friday Staff Report[Icon]
    City Manager’s Office 215 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 76201 (940) 349-8307 MEMORANDUM DATE: March 8, 2019 TO: The Honorable Mayor Watts and Council Members FROM: Todd Hileman, City Manager SUBJECT: Friday Staff Report I. Council Schedule A. Meetings 1. Public Utilities Board Meeting on Monday, March 11, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. in the City Council Work Session Room. 2. No City Council Meeting on Tuesday, March 12, 2019. 3. No Agenda Committee Meeting Wednesday, March 13, 2019. 4. Development Code Review Committee Meeting on Friday, March 15, 2019 at 11:00 a.m. in the City Council Work Session Room. B. Upcoming Events 1. NLC Congressional City Conference, March 10-13, 2019, Washington, D.C. 2. Denton Chamber of Commerce Annual Banquet and Awards Dinner, March 21, 2019 at 6:15 p.m. at UNT Gateway Center. 3. Farewell Celebration for Bryan Langley on Friday, March 22 from 2:00- 4:00 p.m. at City Council Work Session Room. II. General Information & Status Update A. Leadership Transitions – On Monday, March 4, the City of Burleson City Council appointed Denton’s Deputy City Manager, Bryan Langley as their new City Manager. Bryan has been a valued member of the Denton team for more than 10 years and will leave a lasting, positive legacy in our organization. Join us in congratulating Bryan on his new role. Bryan’s last day with the City of Denton OUR CORE VALUES Integrity Fiscal Responsibility Transparency Outstanding Customer Service will be March 26. The City Manager’s Office will host a farewell celebration for Bryan on Friday, March 22 from 2:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]