DOCSLIB.ORG

Mine Water Releases Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mine Water Releases Report APPENDIX 4 – MINE WATER RELEASES REPORT BYERWEN COAL PTY LTD – BYERWEN COAL PROJECT BYERWEN COAL PROJECT Mine Water Releases Prepared for: QCOAL PTY LTD 40 Creek Street BRISBANE QLD 4000 Prepared by: Kellogg Brown & Root Pty Ltd ABN 91 007 660 317 Level 11, 199 Grey Street, SOUTH BANK QLD 4101 Telephone (07) 3721 6555, Facsimile (07) 3721 6500 3 December 2013 BEW106-TD-WE-REP-0008 Rev. 0 CONTENTS Section Page 1 INTRODUCTION 2 RELEASE CRITERIA 2.1 Upper Suttor River Sub-Catchment 2-2 2.2 Rosella Creek Sub-Catchment 2-10 3 EFFECT OF RELEASES 3.1 Suttor River 3-1 3.2 Kangaroo Creek 3-5 4 CONCLUSIONS 5 REFERENCES BEW106-TD-WE-REP-0008 Rev. 0 iii 3 December 2013 1 Introduction The proposed mine water management strategy for the Byerwen Coal Project was described in Appendix 11 of EIS. This included details of the water management philosophy, expected water quality from the mine affected catchments, release strategy, proposed water infrastructure, water balance model and likely effects on hydrology, hydraulics and water quality. Since that report was prepared and based on discussions with the Department of Environment and Heritage Protection (EHP), the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM), and the Department of Science Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts (DISITIA), there have been some modifications to the proposed water quality objectives and release criteria which affect some of the water quality predictions associated with the Project. The purpose of this report is to explain the basis for the modified release criteria and to provide updated water quality predictions and impact assessment in the receiving environment upstream and downstream of the proposed mine. Water quality predictions are made using the water balance model detailed in the mine water management strategy (KBR 2013a). It is noted that the impact on water quality in the Suttor River associated with the mine water releases described herein, is based on revised water quality objectives for the Suttor River, updated as per discussions with EHP, DNRM and DISITIA, which is addressed in KBR (2013b), and on which this report relies. BEW106-TD-WE-REP-0008 Rev. 0 1-1 3 December 2013 2 Release criteria The proposed release criteria for the Project have been developed based on the Model Mining Conditions Guideline (EM944) – Version 4, 26 June 2013 (EHP, 2013) and have been developed with the objective of ensuring releases do not result in unacceptable water quality in the receiving environment. Several factors are considered when deriving release criteria in order to ensure this objective is met including: • receiving environment flow • receiving environment water quality • mine release rate • mine release water quality. Each of these aspects is described below to explain the basis for selection of the proposed criteria. 2.1 UPPER SUTTOR RIVER SUB-CATCHMENT 2.1.1 Derivation of release criteria Receiving environment flow Mine releases will only occur when flow conditions in the receiving environment are above a minimum level, and are derived from a runoff event. Runoff can be separated into two components: • surface runoff (storm flow), defined as the immediate runoff response of a catchment due to saturated soils or rainfall intensity becoming greater than soil infiltration rate • base flow, typically the delayed runoff response of a catchment and is caused by shallow infiltration that later feeds the surface water systems. An analysis of the hydrological regime of Suttor River was conducted in order to determine the flow threshold at which base flow dominates. The hydrological modelling approach was based on the Australian Water Balance Model (AWBM) and is detailed in Appendix 11 of the EIS. A comparison was made between observed data recorded at Eaglefield gauge on Suttor River and modelled runoff. The location of Eaglefield gauge is shown on Figure 2.2 and site details listed in Table 2.1. The comparison between observed and modelled duration curves are shown in Figure 2.2, suggesting that the hydrological model is suitable. BEW106-TD-WE-REP-0008 Rev. 0 2-2 3 December 2013 Table 2.1 Streamflow gauge details Station 120304A Station 120218A Name Suttor River at Eaglefield Kangaroo Creek at Byerwen Long/Lat 147.7143/-21.4504 147.9250/-21.1130 Catchment Area (km2) 1915 371 Data Period 17/08/1967 - Current 06/06/1979 - 01/10/1988 Data Completeness 84% 35% BEW106-TD-WE-REP-0008 Rev. 0 2-3 3 December 2013 Figure 2.1 GAUGING STATIONS USED FOR AWBM VERIFICATION BEW106-TD-WE-REP-0008 Rev. 0 2-4 3 December 2013 10000 1000 Observed runoff at Eaglefield Modelled runoff at Eaglefield 100 10 (m3/s) Flow 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percentage of samples equalled or exceeded Figure 2.2 AWBM MODEL AT EAGLEFIELD (SUTTOR RIVER) The hydrograph was filtered using automated techniques described in Arnold et al (1995) to identify the baseflow component and the typical flow conditions at which baseflow prevails. Alternative methods were also used as a check, such as visual inspection of the hydrographs to identify the recession curve. The dominant flow regime is provided in Figure 2.3. This shows the component of runoff comprising “storm flow”. Approximately 15% of the time the flow in Suttor River is predominately “storm flow”. Storm flow Base flow 100% dominated dominated 90% 80% 70% "Stormflow" 60% comprising 50% 40% Runoff of 30% 20% Component 10% 0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percentage of samples equalled or exceeded Figure 2.1 FLOW REGIME EXCEEDENCE CURVE BEW106-TD-WE-REP-0008 Rev. 0 2-5 3 December 2013 Figure 2.4 shows in more detail the components of flow contributing to the hydrograph. The flow threshold at which storm flow and base flow components are equal is 0.75 m3/s. This value represents flow that is predominantly derived from a runoff event and therefore mine releases could occur. 10000 Storm flow component of Runoff 1000 Base flow component of Runoff Runoff 100 10 /s) 3 (m 1 "Base flow" dominant below 0.75 m3/s Flow 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Probability of Samples Equalled or Exceeded Figure 2.2 BASE FLOW AND STORM FLOW COMPONENTS OF RUNOFF AT EAGLEFIELD (SUTTOR RIVER) Since there is no pre-existing gauge at the proposed flow gauging station for Byerwen, it is necessary to scale the hydrograph and proposed flow thresholds from the Eaglefield gauge to the proposed location. This is performed by scaling by catchment area, as presented in Table 2.2. Table 2.2 Derivation of low flow / recession flow trigger Suttor River @ Eaglefield gauge Suttor River @ (120304A) Byerwen Catchment area (km2) 1,915 825 Base flow / Storm flow 0.75 0.3 threshold (m3/s) (derived above) (scaled by catchment area) Adopted threshold (m3/s) 0.5 While the base flow / storm flow threshold is estimated to be 0.3 m3/s at the proposed gauging station at Byerwen, a conservative value of 0.5 m3/s (factor of safety of more than 1.5) has been adopted as the low/recession flow trigger. Triggers for medium, high, very high and flood flow regimes have been derived by analysis of the hydrograph. The frequency of exceedence for each flow regime is presented in Table 2.3. The very high and flood flow regimes are rarely met, and there is an even split between frequency of exceedance of the other flow regimes, suggesting that the proposed flow triggers are reasonable. BEW106-TD-WE-REP-0008 Rev. 0 2-6 3 December 2013 Table 2.3 Frequency of exceedance of nominated flow triggers Flow trigger Frequency of Flow regime (m3/s) exceedance (%) Low/Recession 0.5 13.5 Medium 1 10.9 High 5 5.2 Very High 15 2.2 Flood 50 0.7 Receiving environment water quality It is proposed to establish a water quality monitoring location downstream of the mine which can be used as a compliance point and referred to in an Environmental Authority (EA). Water quality between the release location(s) and the compliance point would not be influenced by third parties, such as discharges from Glencore’s Newlands Coal Project. The proposed compliance monitoring location is at the Byerwen lease boundary on the Suttor River, downstream of all potential mine releases. The proposed location is shown in Figure 2.5. In order to develop suitable water quality objectives at this location, a revised methodology and approach to deriving trigger values that will be representative of local site conditions is detailed in KBR (2013b). Releases from the mine would be structured such that they do not result in an increase in EC at the compliance location above the 75th percentile, which is 701 µS/cm, as per (KBR 2013b). Mine release rate The proposed release rates have been derived such that it is less than or equal to the natural flow in the receiving environment at the flow gauging station. The release rate has also been selected on the basis of dilution calculations in the receiving environment, using conservative end of pipe and receiving environment assumptions, incorporating a factor of safety. The proposed maximum combined release rate is shown in Table 2.4, together with the receiving flow trigger (derived earlier). Table 2.4 Comparison between flow trigger and maximum combined release rate Receiving environment Maximum combined Flow regime flow trigger (m3/s) release rate (m3/s) Low/Recession 0.5 0.5 Medium 1.0 0.5 High 5.0 2.0 Very High 15.0 4.0 Flood 50.0 10.0 BEW106-TD-WE-REP-0008 Rev.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GWQ1203 - Burdekin Basin Groundwater Location Map Watercourse Cainozoic Deposits Overlying the GAB Zones
    144°0'0"E 145°0'0"E 146°0'0"E 147°0'0"E 148°0'0"E 149°0'0"E Tully 18°0'0"S This map must not be used for marine navigation. 18°0'0"S Comprehensive and updated navigation WARNING information should be obtained from published Mitchell hydrographic charts. Murray DRAFT Hinchinbrook Island Herbert r ve Ri ekin urd B Ingham ! er iv D R ry Gilbert ry Ri D v er r e iv 19°0'0"S Scattered Remnants Northern R 19°0'0"S g Burdekin Headwaters in n n R u Black Townsville ! er r iv e R v rke i la R C r ta S Ross Broken River Ayr ! er ver Riv i ry lt R Haughton go Basa e r Don and Bogie Coastal Area G h t r u ve o i ton R S h ug Ha Bowen ! 20°0'0"S 20°0'0"S r Charters Towers e v ! i Don R B n o o g i D e Riv er Bur dek in R ive r Whitsunday Island Proserpine B owe Proserpine Flinders n ! er R Riv iver e sp a R amp C o Don River l l s to n R iv C e a r North West Suttor Catchment pe R r iv ve e i r R r o t t u S r e Broken v R i iv S e R e r llh L e e i O'Connell p im t t a l R e C iv er B o w e B u r d ekin n B u r d ekin R 21°0'0"S i 21°0'0"S v e BB a a s s in in r B ro Mackay ke ! n River Pioneer Plane Sarina ! Eastern Weathered Su ttor R Cainozoic Remnants Belyandor River iv e er iv R o d n lya e B r e v i R o d Moranbah n ! a ly 22°0'0"S e 22°0'0"S l R B ae iver ich Carm r ive R Diamantina s r o n n o C Styx Belyando River Saline Tertiary Sediments Dysart ! Is a a c R iv B Clermont Middlemount er e ! ! l y an do Riv e r er iv Cooper Creek R ie nz Aramac e ! k c a M 23°0'0"S 23°0'0"S Capella
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Ambient Network (Water Quality) 2020-21
    Surface Water Ambient Network (Water Quality) 2020-21 July 2020 This publication has been compiled by Natural Resources Divisional Support, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy. © State of Queensland, 2020 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Summary This document lists the stream gauging stations which make up the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy (DNRME) surface water quality monitoring network. Data collected under this network are published on DNRME’s Water Monitoring Information Data Portal. The water quality data collected includes both logged time-series and manual water samples taken for later laboratory analysis. Other data types are also collected at stream gauging stations, including rainfall and stream height. Further information is available on the Water Monitoring Information Data Portal under each station listing.
    [Show full text]
  • MITCHELL Versus LEICHHARDT
    179 A STUDY IN COMPARISONS: MITCHELL versus LEICHHARDT [By KATHLEEN EMMERSON] Comparisons are odious, is an old saying, but often they give us valuable "measuring sticks." The century-old argument as to which inland discoverer gave to what became Queensland its greater areas of valu­ able country: viz., Surveyor-General T. Mitchell or free­ lancing Ludwig Leichhardt, has never been answered. To give a correct reply, the work of a computer would be needed, to take down aU the summaries to be found in Pugh's Almanacs, Year Books, and others since 1860. LEICHHARDT'S NO. 1 BLACKFELLOW, "CHARLEY" ON JOURNEY TO PORT ESSINGTON, 1844-45. Charley's Creek, a tributary of the lower Condamine River, was named after him. "A man of uncertain temper but a first class 'cutter of bends,' also a peerless tracker." Sketch copied ftom Leichhardt's Journal of Overland Expedition to Port Essington. The beautiful Fitzroy Downs country (which enchanted young Tom Archer and his mates in 1847) as well as land adjoining the Balonne River and its northern tributaries, have in a hundred years yielded much wool and all that went with it as well as, in the course of time, beef, which had to be 180 overlanded for sale at Wodonga on the Murray, timber also (mostly in this century). The oil from Moonie, gas from Roma (both of tremend­ ous value these modern days), also their wheat, wine and grapes are items not to "be sneezed at." These and other developments make up a vast contribu­ tion from Mitchell's Country. "A BLANKY COASTER" It is not presumptuous to assert that Leichhardt's efforts— and how much more difficult his journeys were than those of the well-equipped Government servant, Mitchell—have yielded more and greater results than his rival.
    [Show full text]
  • Ludwig Leichhardt in the Valley of the Lagoons: the Discovery of a Leichhardt-Tree in North Queensland
    Ludwig Leichhardt in the Valley of the Lagoons: The discovery of a Leichhardt-tree in North Queensland Bernd Marx At the beginning of May 1845, the first Ludwig-Leichhardt-expedition came closer and closer to the headwaters of the Burdekin River. Today, this is the region around the settlement of Greenvale, situated on the Gregory Developmental Road between the regional town Charters Towers and the Forty Mile Scrub National Park. The Valley of the Lagoons can be reached in an easterly direction via a 100 kilometre long track through the outback. One has, however, to ford all the rivers and creeks. The members of the Ludwig-Leichhardt-expedition had hitherto followed the Condamine River (3 days), the Dawson River (10 days), the Robinson Creek in the Expedition Range (6 days), the Comet River (16 days), the Mackenzie River (8 days), the Isaac River (20 days), the Suttor River (28 days) and the Burdekin River (42 days) and had conducted geological, botanical as well as zoological research. When the group reached the Valley of the Lagoons, it had completed 212 days and a distance of approximately 2000 kilometres through the Australian wilderness. The expedition still had 10 bullocks and 15 horses with it. During that seven-month overland journey, six cows had so far been slaughtered. The first had been butchered at Dry Beef Creek on 28 October 1844. The party had by then covered approximately 430 kilometres since leaving its starting point at Jimbour Station. The weight of the dried meat the men carried was approximately 40 kilograms. On 18 December 1844, a second ox was slaughtered for additional provisions at their campground “Brown’s Lagoons” in the Expedition Range.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Section 11 Surface Water
    Vol 3 Tab Dividers:Layout 1 16/9/10 10:17 AM Page 11 11 Alpha Coal Project Environmental Impact Statement 11 Surface Water Section 11 Surface Water 11.1 Introduction This section describes the existing environment for water resources that may be affected by the Alpha Coal Project (Rail) (herein referred to as the Project) in the context of environmental values as defined in such documents as the Environmental Protection Act 1994 (EPA), Environmental Protection (Water) Policy 2009 (EPP Water), the National Water Quality Management Strategy 2000 (NWQMS) Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (ANZECC), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Guideline: Establishing Draft Environmental Values and Water Quality Objectives and the Queensland Water Quality Guidelines 2006. The definition of waters in the EPP (Water) includes the bed and banks of waters, so this section shall address impacts on benthic environment, as well as the water column. For the purposes of this assessment, the study area refers to all waterways and related catchments that are intersected by the Project, both upstream and downstream from the Alpha Coal Mine to the Port of Abbot Point. The majority of the Project is located within the approximately 130,000 km2 Burdekin Basin catchment. The northern part of the Project is located within the much smaller Don River catchment which spans across 3,885 km2 of land (refer to Figure 11-1). The Burdekin Basin catchment is divided into six sub- catchments or sub-basins, three of which are crossed by the Project: x Belyando Suttor sub-basin; x Bowen Broken sub-basin; and x Lower Burdekin sub-basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Erosion Processes and Sources in the Burdekin Dry Tropics Catchment (RP65G)
    Erosion processes and sources in the Burdekin Dry Tropics catchment (RP65G) Synthesis Report Chemistry Centre, Landscape Sciences June 2015 Identifying erosion processes and sources in the Burdekin Dry Tropics catchment (RP65G) – Synthesis Report Prepared by Project team members Joanne Burton a (Project Leader) Taka Furuichi a (KG2 Section Leader) Stephen Lewis b (KG3 Section Leader) Jon Olley c Scott Wilkinson d (KG1 Section Leader) Zoe Bainbridge b a: Department of Science, IT, Innovation and Arts, Brisbane, QLD b: Centre for Tropical Water and Aquatic Ecosystem Research, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD c: Australian River Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD d: CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra, ACT Landscape Sciences Science Division Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation PO Box 5078 Brisbane QLD 4001 © The State of Queensland (Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation) 2015 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence Under this licence you are free, without having to seek permission from DSITI, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland, Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation as the source of the publication. For more information on this licence visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Disclaimer This document has been prepared with all due diligence and care, based on the best available information at the time of publication. The department holds no responsibility for any errors or omissions within this document.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Aquatic Ecology 1
    10 AquatIC ECOLOGY 1 ENTER HERE BACK TO CONTENTS SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT TO THE EIS Arrow Bowen Gas Project SREIS Section 10 Aquatic Ecology 10 Aquatic Ecology 10.1 Objectives This chapter summarises findings from the supplementary aquatic ecology assessment provided in the Aquatic Ecology Technical Report (Appendix H) of the SREIS. The supplementary assessment was undertaken to determine any revised potential impacts the Project may have on aquatic ecological values as a result of changes to the project description and updates to relevant State or Commonwealth legislation. Additionally, this report provides extended discussion around particular submissions made following the public consultation stage of the EIS. 10.2 Summary of Aquatic Ecology Studies for the EIS This section provides an overview of the aquatic ecological impact assessment completed for the EIS (Aquatic Ecology Technical Report (Appendix O)) and the main conclusions from that assessment. The assessment identified and described aquatic ecology values within the Project development area through desktop research and field surveys in selected areas. The EIS desktop study incorporated a detailed literature review and searches of government and non- government databases to inform the location of possible field survey sites and to broadly characterise the existing aquatic environment. Survey site selection was refined through field reconnaissance and consideration of physical and ecological factors. Targeted aquatic field surveys were undertaken during the late 2012 wet season at 15 locations considered representative of the aquatic environment across the Project area. Of the sites surveyed, 13 were located within the Fitzroy Basin whilst two suitable sites were identified and surveyed within the Burdekin Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Network Review Final Report
    Surface Water Network Review Final Report 16 July 2018 This publication has been compiled by Operations Support - Water, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy. © State of Queensland, 2018 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Interpreter statement: The Queensland Government is committed to providing accessible services to Queenslanders from all culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. If you have difficulty in understanding this document, you can contact us within Australia on 13QGOV (13 74 68) and we will arrange an interpreter to effectively communicate the report to you. Surface
    [Show full text]
  • Great Barrier Reef Catchment Loads Monitoring Report 2010-2011
    Total suspended solids, nutrient and pesticide loads (2010-2011) for rivers that discharge to the Great Barrier Reef Great Barrier Reef Catchment Loads Monitoring 2010-2011 Prepared by: Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts © The State of Queensland (Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts) 2013 Copyright inquiries should be addressed to [email protected] or the Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts, Brisbane Qld 4000 Published by the Queensland Government, 2013 Water Sciences Technical Report Volume 2013, Number 1 ISSN 1834-3910 ISBN 978-1-7423-0996 Disclaimer: This document has been prepared with all due diligence and care, based on the best available information at the time of publication. The department holds no responsibility for any errors or omissions within this document. Any decisions made by other parties based on this document are solely the responsibility of those parties. Citation: Turner. R, Huggins. R, Wallace. R, Smith. R, Vardy. S, Warne. M St. J. 2013, Total suspended solids, nutrient and pesticide loads (2010-2011) for rivers that discharge to the Great Barrier Reef Great Barrier Reef Catchment Loads Monitoring 2010-2011 Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts, Brisbane. This publication can be made available in alternative formats (including large print and audiotape) on request for people with a vision impairment. Contact (07) 3170 5470 or email <[email protected]> August 2013 #00000 Executive summary Diffuse pollutant loads discharged from rivers of the east coast of Queensland have caused a decline in water quality in the Great Barrier Reef lagoon.
    [Show full text]
  • Central and Western Queensland Floods January 2008
    Central and Western Queensland Floods January 2008 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Clockwise from top left; 1. Flooded roads around Proserpine. 2. Burdekin Falls Dam 3. Giru flooding from the Air. (newsdotcom) 4. Cars washed off road near Giru. 5. Bradleys Gully floods Charleville. 6. Nogoa River at Fairbairn Dam 7. Dragline and coal mine flooded by the Nogoa River 8. Houses flooded in Emerald. All photos are sourced from the Internet via www or email. Note: 1. Data in this report has been operationally quality controlled but errors may still exist. 2. This product includes data made available to the Bureau by other agencies. Separate approval may be required to use the data for other purposes. See Appendix 1 for DNRW Usage Agreement. 3. This report is not a complete set of all data that is available. It is a representation of some of the key information. Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 1.1 Peak Height Map for January 2008 - Queensland.................................................................. 3 2. Meteorological Summary ............................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Meteorological Analysis......................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 2.1.1 Track of Tropical Low Pressure System from the 9 – 18 January 2008...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Early North Queensland
    EARLY DAYS IN NORTH QUEENSLAND EARLY DAYS IN NORTH QUEENSLAND BY THE LATE EDWARD PALMER SYDNEY ANGUS & ROBERTSON MELBOURNE: ANGUS, ROBERTSON & SHENSTONE 1903 This is a blank page TO THE NORTH-WEST. I know the land of the far, fa y away, Where the salt bush glistens in silver-grey ; Where the emit stalks with her striped brood, Searching the plains for her daily food. I know the land of the far, far west, Where the bower-bird builds her playhouse nest ; Where the dusky savage from day to day, Hunts with his tribe in their old wild way. 'Tis a land of vastness and solitude deep, Where the dry hot winds their revels keep ; The land of mirage that cheats the eye, The land of cloudless and burning sky. 'Tis a land of drought and pastures grey, Where flock-pigeons rise in vast ark ay ; Where the " nardoo" spreads its silvery sheen Over the plains where the floods have beeh. 'Tis a land of gidya and dark boree, Extended o'er plains like an inland sea, Boundless and vast, where the wild winds pass, O'er the long rollers and billows of grass. I made my home in that thirsty land, Where rivers for water are filled with sand ; Where glare and heat and storms sweep by, Where the prairie rolls to the western sky. Cloncurry, 1897. —" Loranthus." W. C. Penfold & Co., Printers, Sydney. PREFACE. HE writer came to Queensland two years before T separation, and shortly afterwards took part in the work of outside settlement, or pioneering, looking for new country to settle on with stock.
    [Show full text]
  • FOI 180712 Document 1
    EPBC Ref: 2018/8191 Mr Hamish Manzi Adani Infrastructure Pty Ltd GPO Box 2569 BRISBANE QLD 4001 Dear Mr Manzi Request for additional information North Galilee Water Scheme, Galilee Basin, Qld Thank you for submitting a referral under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) concerning the above proposed action. An initial examination of your referral indicates that there is insufficient information to allow the Department to consider all the relevant issues. Could you please provide the following further information: details of how the proposed action relates to water supply infrastructure approved under EPBC 2010/5736, including but not limited to the proportion of water harvesting that will occur from the Belyando River and the Suttor River; provide data to show the seasonal flow regime for the Suttor River at the proposed harvest location; a description of geomorphological conditions downstream of the proposed water harvest site. This should include the location of any permanent or semi- permanent pools that may support habitat for matters of national environmental significance; details of how the proposed action is likely to impact species and ecological communities downstream of the proposed harvest location. Species that must be considered include, but are not limited to, Brigalow (Acacia harpophylla dominant and co-dominant) ecological community, Koala (Phascolarctos cinereus), Squatter Pigeon (Geophaps scripta scripta), and Ornamental Snake (Denisonia maculate); and a copy of the Queensland Water Licence (reference 617268) including any conditions. In any correspondence with the Department please quote the title of the action and EPBC reference, as shown at the beginning of this letter.
    [Show full text]