A History of the Neisse Garrison
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Ceny Biletów Jednorazowych
Załącznik 1 do warunków taryfowych oferty pozataryfowej „Połączenie w dobrej cenie” obowiązujących od 01.07.2020 r. Zryczałtowane ceny biletów jednorazowych normalnych ważnych na przejazdy pociągami REGIO przy przejazdach pociągami REGIO na podstawie biletów jednorazowych, zgodnie z postanowieniami ust. 1 warunków taryfowych oferty, stosowane są ulgi ustawowe: 33%, 37%, 49%, 51%, 78%, 93% lub 95% Cena biletu w zł Lp. Relacja przejazdu Uwagi (w tym 8% PTU) 1 Augustów Białystok 13,50 2 Bartąg Olsztyn 3,00 3 Bełżec Lublin 22,00 4 Biała Podlaska Terespol 7,50 5 Białystok Augustów 13,50 6 Białystok Bielsk Podlaski 8,50 7 Białystok Czarna Białostocka 5,00 8 Białystok Dąbrowa Białostocka 12,50 9 Białystok Grajewo 16,00 10 Białystok Kuźnica Białostocka 13,00 11 Białystok Łapy 4,90 12 Białystok Mooki 6,50 13 Białystok Sokółka 7,50 14 Białystok Suwałki 14,50 15 Białystok Szepietowo 11,50 16 Bielsk Podlaski Białystok 8,50 17 Blachownia Częstochowa 3,00 18 Blachownia Herby Stare 3,00 Obowiązuje przy przejazdach od pon. do pt. oprócz świąt 19 Blachownia Kochanowice 3,00 w godz. 6:00 – 16:00, a w 20 Blachownia Lisów 3,00 sob. w godz. 10:00 – 16:00. 21 Blachownia Lubliniec 3,00 22 Bochnia Dębica 14,00 23 Bochnia Rzeszów 19,00 24 Bochnia Sędziszów Małopolski 16,00 25 Chociszew Łódź 6,50 26 Chociwel Stargard 8,00 27 Czarna Białostocka Białystok 5,00 28 Czeremcha Narewka 8,50 29 Czeremcha Siemianówka 9,00 30 Czerwieosk Sulechów 5,50 31 Czerwieosk Zielona Góra 3,50 32 Częstochowa Blachownia 3,00 33 Częstochowa Herby Stare 3,00 Obowiązuje przy przejazdach od pon. -
Interregional Diversity of Social Capital in the Context of Sustainable Development—A Case Study of Polish Voivodeships
sustainability Article Interregional Diversity of Social Capital in the Context of Sustainable Development—A Case Study of Polish Voivodeships Katarzyna Pawlewicz 1 and Adam Pawlewicz 2,* 1 Department of Socio-Economic Geography, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-720 Olsztyn, Poland; [email protected] 2 Department of Agrotechnology, Agricultural Production Management and Agribusiness, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 7 May 2020; Accepted: 8 July 2020; Published: 10 July 2020 Abstract: The relationship between social capital and sustainable development challenges is of special importance. However, social capital is a complex phenomenon that is analyzed in different contexts and cannot be investigated with the use of a single variable. Social capital is difficult to define, which is why the selection of variables for measuring social capital can be problematic. The aim of this study was to analyze variations in social capital at the regional level. The study was conducted in Poland, and it covered all 16 Polish voivodeships (regions) where social capital was evaluated based on five measures: civic engagement in political and social life, degree of selfless behavior, sense of security and social confidence, formation of social structures, and the observance of social norms (external factors), and attitudes (internal factors) that foster desirable social interactions. The correlations between the above measures were also determined. Composite indicators of the analyzed measures were developed with the use of the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method. The results were used to rank Polish voivodeships and group them into three classes based on the corresponding values of the adopted measures. -
OF GERMANY Public HEALTH and MEDICAL AFFAIRS
MILITARY GOVERNMENT OF GERMANY PUBLiC HEALTH AND MEDICAL AFFAIRS monthly Report of Military Governor U.S. ZONE 20 SEPTEMBER 1945 No. 2 »SMIOOUCCO »T »*»TM fNG» TOP CO MEDICAL AND HEALTH AFFAIRS SYNOPSIS Denazification of German health personnel is continuing although many re- placements have 1)66» found to he inexperienced or too old and inactive. Improved Communications have facilitated hetter reporting from the field which shows an in- crease in communicahle diseases throughout the United Stetes Zone» Venereal dis- eases continue to he the most extensive hazard to American troops. Military Gov- ernment has initiated a program for civilian control of venereal diseases and other communicahle diseases» Constant check is heing maintained on the movement of displaced persons and refugees into Germany in Order to prevent an importation of infectious diseases which might resu.lt in epidemics» Surveys continue to show nutritional deficiency of the vivilian population. Water siqjply distrihuting Systems are heing repaired as expeditiously as possihle to improve sanitation. Efforts are heing made to enlarge hospitalization facilities to meet the needs of the winter months» A system of medical supply, making the maximum use of local civilian supplies hefore utilizing military Stocks» is now in effect, and no ser- ious shortage of civilian requirements is anticipated. SECTION I ORGANIZATION ALLIED HEALTH COMMITTEE A committee of the Internal Affairs and Communications Directorate, Allied Control Authority, met on 28 August and drew up Terms of -
Russia: Background and U.S
Russia: Background and U.S. Policy Updated August 21, 2017 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R44775 Russia: Background and U.S. Policy Summary Over the last five years, Congress and the executive branch have closely monitored and responded to new developments in Russian policy. These developments include the following: increasingly authoritarian governance since Vladimir Putin’s return to the presidential post in 2012; Russia’s 2014 annexation of Ukraine’s Crimea region and support of separatists in eastern Ukraine; violations of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty; Moscow’s intervention in Syria in support of Bashar al Asad’s government; increased military activity in Europe; and cyber-related influence operations that, according to the U.S. intelligence community, have targeted the 2016 U.S. presidential election and countries in Europe. In response, the United States has imposed economic and diplomatic sanctions related to Russia’s actions in Ukraine and Syria, malicious cyber activity, and human rights violations. The United States also has led NATO in developing a new military posture in Central and Eastern Europe designed to reassure allies and deter aggression. U.S. policymakers over the years have identified areas in which U.S. and Russian interests are or could be compatible. The United States and Russia have cooperated successfully on issues such as nuclear arms control and nonproliferation, support for military operations in Afghanistan, the Iranian and North Korean nuclear programs, the International Space Station, and the removal of chemical weapons from Syria. In addition, the United States and Russia have identified other areas of cooperation, such as countering terrorism, illicit narcotics, and piracy. -
Operational-Strategic Commands
Yeltsin's Latest Military Reform Initiative: OperationalOperational---StrategicStrategic Commands Eva Busza November 1998 PONARS Policy Memo 44 College of William and Mary This fall the Yeltsin administration announced a new military reform initiative: the transformation of existing military districts into operational strategic commands. While the proposed system has been adopted in order to strengthen the ability of the armed forces to maintain order on the territory and the borders of the Russian federation, the new system is likely to hinder state consolidation and undermine democratic governance. Background Russia inherited a system of military-administrative units from the Soviet Union. Until recently the country was divided into eight military districts and one special region. Each district was made up of units of the ground troops, special troops, district rear services, military educational institutions and local military command and control bodies. Air Force and Air Defense Troops units deployed in the region were often also subordinated to the district administration. The district administration was charged with carrying out operational, military-administrative, and mobilizational tasks. It was to supply logistics support to the units on its territory and to provide territorial defense. In the last five years the number of separately functioning military structures has proliferated more than 30 state military organizations are believed to exist). Some have created their own separate district organizational structure. For example, today there are seven districts of the Internal Troops of the Ministry of Interior, nine Federal Border Service districts, and nine regional centers of the Russian Ministry for Civil Defense, Emergencies and the Elimination of the Effects of Natural Disasters. -
Socio-Economic Study of the Area of Interest
SOCIO-ECONOMIC STUDY OF THE AREA OF INTEREST AIR TRITIA 2018 Elaborated within the project „SINGLE APPROACH TO THE AIR POLLUTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR THE FUNCTIONAL AREAS OF TRITIS” (hereinafter AIR TRITIA) (č. CE1101), which is co-financed by the European Union through the Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE programme. Socio-economic study of the area of interest has been elaborated by the research institute: ACCENDO – Centrum pro vědu a výzkum, z. ú. Švabinského 1749/19, 702 00 Ostrava – Moravská Ostrava, IČ: 28614950, tel.: +420 596 112 649, web: http://accendo.cz/, e-mail: [email protected] Authors: Ing. Ivana Foldynová, Ph.D. Ing. Petr Proske Mgr. Andrea Hrušková Doc. Ing. Lubor Hruška, Ph.D. RNDr. Ivan Šotkovský, Ph.D. Ing. David Kubáň a další Citation pattern: FOLDYNOVÁ, I.; HRUŠKOVÁ, A.; ŠOTKOVSKÝ, I.; KUBÁŇ, D. a kol. (2018) Socio- ekonomická studie zájmového území“. Ostrava: ACCENDO. Elaborated by: 31. 5. 2018 2 List of Contents List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................. 4 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 6 1. Specification of the Area of Interest ......................................................................... 7 1.1 ESÚS TRITIA ................................................................................................. 7 1.2 Basic Classification of Territorial Units ................................................................ 8 2. Methodology .................................................................................................... -
Environmental & Socio-Economic Studies
Environmental & Socio-economic Studies DOI: 10.1515/environ-2015-0004 Environ. Socio.-econ. Stud., 2013, 1, 1: 22-30 © 2013 Copyright by University of Silesia ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Extinct and endangered species in the vascular plant flora of Strzelce Opolskie (Southern Poland) Łukasz Folcik1, Andrzej Urbisz1 1Department of Plant Systematics, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia, Jagiellońska Str. 28, 40-032 Katowice, Poland E–mail address (corresponding author): [email protected] ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT Symptoms of anthropogenic changes in the vascular plant flora include the spread of some species groups and the extinction of others. Also habitat condition changes (eutrophication, pollution etc.) and biodiversity loss (at a regional, national and even continental scale) should be mentioned. Numerous papers with rare plant species localities and endangered habitats have been published but the extinction processes and scale of this phenomenon in urban areas where environmental conservation is crucial, are not often analysed. The aim of the present study is to estimate species loss in the vascular plant flora of the town Strzelce Opolskie (Chełm, Silesian Upland) on the basis of the floristic literature and botanical surveys carried out from 2011 to 2013. A comparison has been made between the list of species reported up to 1945 and those species currently occurring in the study area. As a result, a list of 99 species included in the red list of plants of Opole and Silesian voivodeships is presented. Among this group, 45 species are not confirmed after 1945. Numerous extinct and endangered species are from families: Orchidaceae (8 species), Cyperaceae (7 species), Ranunculaceae (7 species) and Lamiaceae (6 species). -
Opolska Droga Rzeczna. Analizy
OPOLSKA DROGA RZECZNA. ANALIZY Projekt realizowany w ramach obchodów stulecia odzyskania niepodległości ISBN 978-83-949449-7-1 Odra – rzeka wspomnień i wyzwań | Część 1 | Ocalone dla przyszłości. Odrzańska droga wodna: studia i materiały 1 ODRA – RZEKA WSPOmnień I WYZWań Część 1 Archiwum Państwowe w Opolu - Archiwalne Źródła Tożsamości, 2 Komitet naukowy: Tomasz Ciesielski (Uniwersytet Opolski) Norbert Kasparek (Uniwersytet Olsztyński, Archiwum Państwowe w Olsztynie) Wojciech Krawczuk (Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Archiwum Narodowe w Krakowie) Mirosław Lenart (Uniwersytet Opolski, Archiwum Państwowe w Opolu) Gianpaolo Romanato (Università di Padova, Pontificio Comitato di Scienze Storiche) Krzysztof Stopka (Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Muzeum Collegium Maius Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego) Gianni Venditti (Archivio Segreto Vaticano) ODRA – RZEKA WSPOmnień I WYZWań Część 1 Ocalone dla przyszłości – Odrzańska droga wodna: studia i materiały (Opolska Droga Rzeczna. Analizy) Redakcja naukowa Mirosław Lenart, Aleksandra Starczewska-Wojnar Opole 2018 Archiwum Państwowe w Opolu - Archiwalne Źródła Tożsamości, 2 Patronat honorowy edycji: Wojewoda Opolski, Prezydent Miasta Opola Recenzent: prof. UO Tomasz Ciesielski Redakcja językowa: dr Małgorzata Iżykowska Projekt okładki i opracowanie graficzne: Mirosław Słomski Na okładce wykorzystano fotografię autorstwa Jerzego Stemplewskiego Publikacja współfinansowana przez Naczelną Dyrekcję Archiwów Państwowych, Urząd Miasta Opola, Opolski Urząd Wojewódzki Opolski Urząd Wojewódzki C: 0% Copyright tekst M: 100% -
Enclave to Exclave: Kaliningrad Between Russia and the European Union
Enclave To Exclave: Kaliningrad Between Russia And The European Union Brian Vitunic Columbia University The Kaliningrad region compels questions that neither Russia nor the European Union are ready to answer. Russian territory located outside of Russia’s contiguous borders, Kaliningrad’s unique geographic status stretches both the physical dimensions and conceptual cohesion of the European Union and Russia. When the surrounding countries Lithuania and Poland become EU members, probably in 2004, the 15,100-sq-km region will become a Russian exclave in “Schengenland.” The most immediate problem for the territory will be the impact of the border controls, visa regime, and customs agreements that new EU members must enact under the Schengen Agreement.1 Currently free of visa requirements, Kaliningraders would need Schengen visas for overland transit across Lithuania and Poland in the expanded EU. In addition to isolating with a paper wall the 1.3 million Kaliningrad residents from their own country of citizenship, restrictions on the movements of goods and people would damage Kaliningrad’s weak economy, which is propped by small-scale cross-border smuggling and legal trade,2 and potentially substitute a cordon sanitaire for active solutions to the region’s problems. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Ivan Ivanov singled out the four main problems of the Kaliningrad territory at a 7 March 2002 meeting with European Commission officials and Polish and Lithuanian government leaders: visas, transit, energy, and fish.3 He noted that agreements with neighboring countries over fishery quotas address the fish issue; energy supply will be guaranteed by construction of a power-generating station in Kaliningrad as part of a Russian federal program in 2005. -
Russian Army in 2014 and Western Military District
Russian Army in 2014 and Western Military District Andrey Frolov, Centre for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies (CAST) , 2014 0 Russian army, general data .Russia is the second world military power taking into account its strategic arsenal and the third as a conventional military power. .Russia holds the third place in the world regarding its defense spending. .The “paper” number of enlisted men is 1000000, but real figure is 800000. .Strategic deterrent forces: ~489 strategic launchers and ~1700 nuclear warheads: 311 missiles, 11 SSBNs (180 SLBMs), 66 strategic bombers. .Active units account 2800 tanks, 7500 AIFV, 5500 pieces of artillery, 200 tactical missiles. .Air Force consists of ~100 long-range bombers, 700 fighters, 400 attack aircraft, 400 attack helicopters, 600 utility helicopters (*all figures are estimates). Main guidelines of security &defense policy of Vladimir Putin’s third presidency .Strengthening of international security. .Denial of confrontation. .Resistance to proliferation of the nuclear weapons, local conflicts & crisis, terrorism, drug trafficking. .Reliable defense of Russia in order to maintain it sovereign & independent policy, develop its economy and democratic institutes. .Confirmation of the amount of State Armament Program – 22 trln rubles up to 2020. 2 The main military challenges & threats according to Vladimir Putin .The diminishing of the importance of nuclear weapons due to the low probability of the conflict among nuclear powers. .The development of the new gen weapons based on new physical principles. .Inadequate structure of the Armed Forces Russia inherited from former USSR .The need of dynamic development of the Army structures, nuclear and space industry, military-industrial complex, military education, military science and applied research 3 Russian Army by 2014 .Starting in 2008 the “New Look Army” reform succeeded by 2011 under minister of defense Anotoly Serdyukov. -
DEPARTMENT of the ARMY the Pentagon, Washington, DC 20310 Phone (703) 695–2442
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20310 phone (703) 695–2442 SECRETARY OF THE ARMY 101 Army Pentagon, Room 3E700, Washington, DC 20310–0101 phone (703) 695–1717, fax (703) 697–8036 Secretary of the Army.—Dr. Mark T. Esper. Executive Officer.—COL Joel Bryant ‘‘JB’’ Vowell. UNDER SECRETARY OF THE ARMY 102 Army Pentagon, Room 3E700, Washington, DC 20310–0102 phone (703) 695–4311, fax (703) 697–8036 Under Secretary of the Army.—Ryan D. McCarthy. Executive Officer.—COL Patrick R. Michaelis. CHIEF OF STAFF OF THE ARMY (CSA) 200 Army Pentagon, Room 3E672, Washington, DC 20310–0200 phone (703) 697–0900, fax (703) 614–5268 Chief of Staff of the Army.—GEN Mark A. Milley. Vice Chief of Staff of the Army.—GEN James C. McConville (703) 695–4371. Executive Officers: COL Milford H. Beagle, Jr., 695–4371; COL Joseph A. Ryan. Director of the CSA Staff Group.—COL Peter N. Benchoff, Room 3D654 (703) 693– 8371. Director of the Army Staff.—LTG Gary H. Cheek, Room 3E663, 693–7707. Sergeant Major of the Army.—SMA Daniel A. Dailey, Room 3E677, 695–2150. Directors: Army Protocol.—Michele K. Fry, Room 3A532, 692–6701. Executive Communications and Control.—Thea Harvell III, Room 3D664, 695–7552. Joint and Defense Affairs.—COL Anthony W. Rush, Room 3D644 (703) 614–8217. Direct Reporting Units Commanding General, U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command.—MG John W. Charlton (443) 861–9954 / 861–9989. Superintendent, U.S. Military Academy.—LTG Robert L. Caslen, Jr. (845) 938–2610. Commanding General, U.S. Army Military District of Washington.—MG Michael L. -
Agrarian-Economic Structure of Agricultural Holdings in Poland and East Germany: Selected Elements of Comparative Analysis
QUAESTIONES GEOGRAPHICAE 33(2) • 2014 AGRARIAN-ECONOMIC STRUCTURE OF AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS IN POLAND AND EAST GERMANY: SELECTED ELEMENTS OF COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 1 2 1 ALEKSANDRA JEZIERSKA-THÖLE , JÖRG JANZEN , ROMAN RUDNICKI 1 Department of Spatial Management and Tourism, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland 2 Institute of Geographical Sciences, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany Manuscript received: July 31, 2013 Revised version: March 6, 2014 JEZIERSKA-THÖLE A., JANZEN J., RUDNICKI R., 2014. Agrarian-economic structure of agricultural holdings in Poland and East Germany: Selected elements of comparative analysis. Quaestiones Geographicae 33(2), Bogucki Wydawnictwo Nau- kowe, Poznań, pp. 87–101, 4 tables, 8 figs. DOI 10.2478/quageo-2014-0018, ISSN 0137-477X. ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to determine differences in the development of farms in Poland against the agri- culture of East Germany, and to show areas with similar conditions for development. The time range of the research covered the years 2002–2010, i.e. the stage of preparation of Polish agriculture for accession to the European Union, the implementation of pre-accession aid programmes, and the establishment and implementation of the tools of the Com- mon Agricultural Policy. To assess the level of agricultural development, natural, productive and social characteristics were adopted. Spatial variations in the analysed features were based on the variation coefficient (Vz), and the level of agricultural development, on Perkal’s index (Wi). In the analysed period the range of variation and the degree of the spatial dispersion of sub-indices changed, indicating a deepening of the polarisation processes in agriculture.