DLA Piper's Legal Privilege Global Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

DLA Piper's Legal Privilege Global Guide

FULL HANDBOOK Legal privilege global guide DOWNLOADED: 02 OCT 2021 DLA PIPER | LEGAL PRIVILEGE GLOBAL GUIDE Table of contents About . Australia . 5 Austria . 9 Bahrain . 12 Belgium . 14 Brazil . 17 Canada . 19 Chile . 24 China . 29 Czech Republic . 31 Denmark . 34 England and Wales . 37 Egypt . 42 European Union . 44 Finland . 49 France . 53 Germany . 56 Greece . 60 Hong Kong . 63 Hungary . 67 Ireland . 70 Israel . 75 Italy . 77 Japan . 80 Kuwait . 84 Lebanon . 86 Luxembourg . 88 Morocco . 91 Netherlands . 94 New Zealand . 98 Norway . 103 Oman . ..

164

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Divulgação Bibliográfica
Divulgação bibliográfica Julho/Agosto 2019 Biblioteca da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Coimbra Sumário BASES DE DADOS NA FDUC ........................................................................................ 4 E-BOOKS .................................................................................................................. 6 MONOGRAFIAS ........................................................................................................ 52 Ciências Jurídico-Empresariais................................................................................................................. 53 Ciências Jurídico-Civilísticas ..................................................................................................................... 70 Ciências Jurídico-Criminais ...................................................................................................................... 79 Ciências Jurídico-Económicas .................................................................................................................. 82 Ciências Jurídico-Filosóficas ..................................................................................................................... 83 Ciências Jurídico-Históricas ..................................................................................................................... 88 Ciências Jurídico-Políticas ........................................................................................................................ 94 Vária ......................................................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
4.08 “Open Door” Evidence (1) a Party
4.08 “Open Door” Evidence (1) A party may “open the door” to the introduction by an opposing party of evidence that would otherwise be inadmissible when in the presentation of argument, cross-examination of a witness, or other presentation of evidence the party has given an incomplete and misleading impression on an issue. (2) A trial court must exercise its discretion to decide whether a party has “opened the door” to otherwise inadmissible evidence. In so doing, the trial court should consider whether, and to what extent, the evidence or argument claimed to “open the door” is incomplete and misleading and what, if any, otherwise inadmissible evidence is reasonably necessary to explain, clarify, or otherwise correct an incomplete and misleading impression. (3) To assure the proper exercise of the court’s discretion and avoid the introduction of otherwise inadmissible evidence, the recommended practice is for a party to apply to the trial court for a ruling on whether the door has been opened before proceeding forward, and the court should so advise the parties before taking evidence. Note Subdivisions (1) and (2) recite the long-settled “open door” principle in New York, as primarily explained in People v Melendez (55 NY2d 445 [1982]); People v Rojas (97 NY2d 32, 34 [2001]); People v Massie (2 NY3d 179 [2004]); and People v Reid (19 NY3d 382 [2012]). Melendez dealt with the issue of whether the defense had opened the door to permit the prosecutor to explore an aspect of the investigation that would not otherwise have been admissible. The Court began by noting that, when an “opposing party ‘opens the door’ on cross-examination to matters not touched upon during the direct examination, a party has the right on redirect to explain, clarify and fully elicit [the] question only partially examined on cross-examination.” (Melendez at 451 1 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted].) Argument to the jury or other presentation of evidence also may open the door to the admission of otherwise inadmissible evidence.
[Show full text]
A&G Goldman P'ship V. Picard (In Re Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Secs. LLC
Neutral As of: July 16, 2018 9:45 PM Z A&G Goldman P’ship v. Picard (In re Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Secs. LLC) United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit June 27, 2018, Decided No. 17-512-bk Reporter 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 17574 *; 2018 WL 3159228 propping-up, disguised, quotation, collapse IN RE: BERNARD L.MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, Debtor.A & G GOLDMAN PARTNERSHIP, PAMELA GOLDMAN, Appellants, v. Case Summary IRVING H. PICARD, Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC and Overview Bernard L. Madoff, CAPITAL GROWTH COMPANY, DECISIONS INCORPORATED, FAVORITE FUNDS, JA HOLDINGS: [1]-A suit alleging that an investor in a PRIMARY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, JA SPECIAL Ponzi scheme and associated entities were liable for LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, JAB PARTNERSHIP, JEMW securities fraud as controlling persons under 15 PARTNERSHIP, JF PARTNERSHIP, JFM U.S.C.S. § 78t(a) was barred by an injunction entered in INVESTMENT COMPANIES, JLN PARTNERSHIP, connection with a Securities Investor Protection Act JMP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, JEFFRY M. PICOWER trustee's settlement of a fraudulent transfer claim. The SPECIAL CO., JEFFRY M. PICOWER P.C., THE facts alleged did not give rise to a colorable claim that PICOWER FOUNDATION, THE PICOWER INSTITUTE the investor controlled the entity through which the FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH, THE TRUST F/B/O Ponzi scheme was perpetrated, so the substance of the GABRIELLE H. PICOWER, BARBARA PICOWER, allegations amounted to only a derivative fraudulent individually and as Executor of the Estate of Jeffry M. transfer claim. Picower, and as Trustee for the Picower Foundation and for The trust f/b/o Gabrielle H.
[Show full text]
The Louisiana Civil Law Notary Journal Signed & Sealed
The Louisiana Civil Law Notary Journal Signed & Sealed VOLUME XXIV ISSUE I Louisiana Notary Association January 2016 XXIV, ISSUE I SIGNED & SEALED PAGE 1 Signed & Sealed ABOUT THIS ISSUE The Louisiana Civil Law Notary Journal Our new full color issue contains a recap of the 2016 convention highlights and a new series entitled Karen Dunn and Lisa McCoy Notary2Notary.. Editors Published by the Louisiana Notary Association TABLE OF CONTENTS www.lna.org Divorce Pleadings-To Do or Not to Do .................. 4 Louisiana Notary Association is a 501(c)(3) Non-profit Educational A look at the consequences of preparing Corporation organized for the public divorce pleadings. benefit exclusively for educational and historical purposes to provide information and educational A Treasure Chest of Knowledge opportunities regarding the public 2015 Convention Recap ........................................ 8 office of the commissioned Louisiana Highlights of the 2015 Annual Meeting and Convention. Civil Law Notary and the official duties of the office, and to preserve the traditions and cultural heritage Louisiana Notaries Public ...................................... 9 afforded by the unique and superior Reprinted from Around the Bar, November 2015 principles of law as set forth in the with permission of the author. Louisiana Civil Code. Address written correspondence to: Notary Nest ........................................................... 14 Fourth in a series of brain teasers; this one features Editor: Signed & Sealed Louisiana Notary Association terms specific to mandates. 8550 United Plaza Blvd., Suite 1001 Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70809 FEATURES or email to [email protected] Photos from the 2015 Annual Meeting and Convention .......................................................... 6-7 Submissions for publication are welcome, and are accepted subject Notary2Notary………………………………………..12 to editorial control of publisher.
[Show full text]
CCBE Charter of Core Principles of the European Legal Profession
Council of Bars & Law Societies of Europe The voice of the European legal profession Rue Joseph II, 40/8 - 1000 Brussels T +32 (0)2 234 65 10 - [email protected] - www.ccbe.eu Charter of core principles of the European legal profession & Code of conduct for European lawyers Edition 2019 The 2019 edition includes the amendments to the commentary on Principle (g) of the Charter approved by the Plenary Session on 17 May 2019. Responsible editor: Philip Buisseret Cover illustration: ©gunnar3000 - Fotolia.com The Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE) has as its principal object to represent its member Bars and Law Societies, whether they are full members (i.e. those of the European Union, the European Economic Area and the Swiss Confederation), or associated or observer members, on all matters of mutual interest relating to the exercise of the profession of lawyer, the development of the law and practice pertaining to the rule of law and the administration of justice and substantive developments in the law itself, both at a European and international level (Article III 1.a. of the CCBE Statutes). In this respect, it is the official representative of Bars and Law Societies which between them comprise more than 1 million European lawyers. The CCBE has adopted two foundation texts, which are included in this brochure, that are both complementary and very different in nature. The more recent one is the Charter of Core Principles of the European Legal Profession which was adopted at the plenary session in Brussels on 24 November 2006.
[Show full text]
Proposed Amendments to Fed. R. Crim. P. 26: an Exchange: Remote Testimony Richard D
University of Michigan Law School University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository Articles Faculty Scholarship 2002 Proposed Amendments to Fed. R. Crim. P. 26: An Exchange: Remote Testimony Richard D. Friedman University of Michigan Law School, [email protected] Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles/158 Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, and the Evidence Commons Recommended Citation Friedman, Richard D. "Remote Testimony." U. Mich. J. L. Reform 35, no. 4 (2002): 695-717. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REMOTE TESTIMONY Richard D. Friedman* Recently, the Supreme Court declined to pass on to Congress a proposed change to FederalRule of Criminal Procedure 26 submitted to it by the Judicial Conference. In this Article, ProfessorFriedman addresses this proposal, which would allow for more extensive use of remote, video-based testimony at criminal trials. He agrees with the majority of the Court that the proposal raised serious problems under the Confrontation Clause. He also argues that a revised proposal, in addition to better protecting the confrontation rights of defendants, should include more definite quality standards,abandon its reliance on the definition of unavailabilityfound in the FederalRules ofEvidence, and allow defendants greaterflexibility in the use of remote testimony.
[Show full text]
Proffer, Plea and Cooperation Agreements in the Second Circuit
G THE B IN EN V C R H E S A N 8 D 8 B 8 A E 1 R SINC Web address: http://www.law.com/ny VOLUME 230—NO.27 THURSDAY, AUGUST 7, 2003 OUTSIDE COUNSEL BY ALAN VINEGRAD Proffer, Plea and Cooperation Agreements in the Second Circuit he Department of Justice over- Northern and Western districts provide sees 93 U.S. Attorney’s offices that proffer statements will not be used in throughout the country and any criminal proceeding, the Eastern and beyond. Thousands of criminal Southern agreements are narrower, T promising only that such statements will prosecutors in these offices are responsible for enforcing a uniform set of criminal not be introduced in the government’s statutes, sentencing guidelines and case-in-chief or at sentencing. Thus, Department of Justice internal policies. proffer statements in those districts may Among the basic documents that are be offered at detention hearings and criminal prosecutors’ tools of the trade are suppression hearings as well as grand proffer, plea and cooperation agreements. jury proceedings. These documents govern the relationship Death Penalty Proffer. The Eastern between law enforcement and many of the District’s proffer agreement has a provision subjects, targets and defendants whom defendant) to make statements to the that assures a witness or defendant that DOJ investigates and prosecutes. government without fear that those proffer statements will not be considered Any belief that these agreements are as statements will be used directly against the by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in deciding uniform as the laws and policies underly- witness in a later prosecution.
[Show full text]
Growing with Purpose, Sustainability
Growing with purpose Sustainability Report 2019 Sustainability Report 2019 Table of contents / 2 Table of contents Engagement 56 Introduction 3 Our Corporate Sustainability Strategy 11 Social investment programs 57 Message from our President and CEO 4 Environmental 15 Disaster recovery 60 A note about Kelly’s COVID-19 response 5 Environment 17 A timeline of Kelly’s Corporate Sustainability Strategy 6 Energy efficiency 19 Governance 61 Our business 7 Water consumption 22 Ethics and business conduct 63 Governance 64 Mergers, acquisitions, investments, and divestitures 8 Waste management 22 Code of Business Conduct and Ethics 65 Kelly by the numbers 9 Occupational health & safety 23 Privacy and data protection 66 Recognition 10 Occupational health & safety: employees 24 Occupational health & safety: customers 24 Communication and reporting 67 Internal communications 68 Social 27 Employees and people 29 External communications - sustainability standards 69 Our people 30 Transparency and integrity line 69 Diversity and inclusion 41 How we report 70 Human rights 45 Materiality 71 Supply chain and customer relations 46 Stakeholder engagement 73 Our supply chain (KellyOCG) 49 Supplier risk management 52 About this report 76 S upplier Code of Conduct 53 GRI index 78 Diverse supplier strategy 54 Sustainability Report 2019 Table of contents / 3 Introduction Message from our President and CEO A note about Kelly’s COVID-19 response A timeline of Kelly’s Corporate Sustainability Strategy Our business Mergers, acquisitions, investments, and divestitures Kelly by the numbers Recognition Sustainability Report 2019 Introduction / Message from our President and CEO Table of contents / 4 Message from our President and CEO At Kelly®, we know who we are.
[Show full text]
How to Use a Solicitor in England and Wales
How to use a solicitor in England and Wales Easy Read Do you need a solicitor? Solicitors give advice about the law. They are experts and can help you understand your rights and solve different legal problems you may have. There are many areas of law and different legal problems. For example, if you need help with a lease if you want to complain about a service or if you feel you lost your job unfairly. 2 If you need a solicitor you should choose one who knows the law about the problem you have and can help you. This guidance will tell you about what to expect when you use a solicitor. It also tells you how you can get the best and most suitable help for you. Finding a solicitor You can find a solicitor in different ways. Local advice agencies such as a law centre or Citizens Advice Bureau can recommend solicitors. You might like to talk to friends, family or local groups about their experiences. 3 You can also find solicitors through the Law Society at: www.lawsociety.org.uk/ FindASolicitor If you are arrested and kept in custody at a police station you can get free legal advice. If you are charged with a criminal offence and you need to go to court, you may be able to get free legal advice. Meeting your solicitor When you have chosen a solicitor you will need to make an appointment. If you need to see a solicitor urgently the solicitor should try and see you as quickly as possible.
[Show full text]
The Asia-Pacific Investigations Review 2018
THE INVESTIGATIONS REVIEW OF THE AMERICAS 2018 – A Global Investigations Review Special Report THE ASIA-PACIFIC INVESTIGATIONS REVIEW 2018 Published by Global Investigations Review in association with AlixPartners Kim & Chang Archer & Angel King & Wood Mallesons DLA Piper Linklaters FTI Consulting Nishimura & Asahi Herbert Smith Freehills Tilleke & Gibbins Hogan Lovells WongPartnership LLP GIR Globwww.globalinvestigationsreview.comal Investigati ons Review The law and practice of international investigations Global Investigations Review GIR The law and practice of iinnternternatiatioonalnal investigationsinvestigations The Asia-Pacific Investigations Review 2018 A Global Investigations Review Special Report The Asia-Pacific Investigations Review 2018 Senior co-publishing business development manager George Ingledew Senior co-publishing manager Edward Perugia [email protected] Tel: +1 202 831 4658 Head of production Adam Myers Editorial coordinator Iain Wilson Chief subeditor Jonathan Allen Senior production editor Simon Busby Senior subeditor Anna Andreoli Editor, Global Investigations Review David Vascott Editor in chief David Samuels Cover image credit: ismagilov/iStock/Thinkstock Subscription details To subscribe please contact: Tel: +44 20 3780 4242 Fax: +44 20 7229 6910 [email protected] No photocopying. CLA and other agency licensing systems do not apply. For an authorised copy contact Edward Perugia ([email protected]) The information provided in this publication is general and may not apply in a specific situation. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any legal action based on the information provided. This information is not intended to create, nor does receipt of it constitute, a lawyer–client relationship. The publishers and authors accept no responsibility for any acts or omissions contained herein.
[Show full text]
Legal Report 2019
LEGAL REPORT 2019 IN THIS SECTION 2 Global review 10 Americas 3 League tables 13 Asia Pacific 5 Project list 16 EMEA FEATURES CROSS-BORDER DEALS BOOST LAWYERS INTERNATIONAL LAW FIRMS FACE A MORE HOSTILE GLOBAL POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT BUT THE LARGE-SCALE CROSS-BORDER DEALS THEY THRIVE ON KEEP ON COMING. APPETITE FOR RENEWABLE AND EMERGING MARKET DEALS IS HEALTHY WHILE SOME DEVELOPED AREAS ARE SLOWING DOWN. The Refinitiv Project Finance International (PFI) In addition, there is a tendency for some firms annual survey of the legal industry shows that on both sides of the pond to build up teams in activity in the global projects market remains niche areas and to see how it works out. Some strong, with plenty of activity both in cross- might be successful, others not. border financings and the larger domestic deals. Our annual survey includes an editorial review The survey details all deals with a capital value of of the market with a wrap-up of all the movers more than US$500m transacted in the 12 months to and shakers in the NY projects market over the end-September each year in order to examine the previous year. market for major projects around the world. One of the most significant moves in NY was This year, there has been some movement at the top that of tax equity expert David Burton, who left of the table with Clifford Chance moving to the top, Mayer Brown for Norton Rose Fulbright’s New just ahead of Allen & Overy, a reversal from last year. York office.
[Show full text]
Rules of Evidence
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMMITTEE ON RULES OF EVIDENCE Title 225 - Rules of Evidence [225 Pa. Code ART 1] Proposed Amendment of Pa.R.E. 104 and Revision of Comment The Committee on Rules of Evidence is planning to recommend that the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania approve the Amendment of Pa.R.E. 104 and Revision of Comment. This proposal has not been submitted for review by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. The text for the proposed changes precede the Report. Additions are bold and underlined, and deletions are in [bold and brackets]. We request that interested persons submit suggestions, comments, or objections concerning this proposal to the Committee through counsel: Daniel A. Durst, Chief Counsel Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Committee on Rules of Evidence Pennsylvania Judicial Center 601 Commonwealth Ave., Suite 6200 P.O. Box 62635 Harrisburg, PA 17106-2635 Fax: (717) 231-9536 Email: [email protected] no later than July 30, 2010 By the Committee on Rules of Evidence PROFESSOR SANDRA D. JORDAN, CHAIR REPORT Proposed Amendment of Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence 104 (Preliminary Questions) and Revision of Comment Often the admissibility of evidence is conditioned upon the proof of foundational facts. Pennsylvania Rule of Evidence 104, modeled after Federal Rule of Evidence 104, adopted a process whereby preliminary questions concerning foundational facts are to be decided by the judge before the evidence can be admitted. To illustrate, a statement by a co-conspirator of a party made during the course and in the furtherance of a conspiracy may be admissible and not excluded as hearsay. However, a preliminary question must be answered before the statement can be admitted as a hearsay exception, to wit, whether there was a conspiracy.
[Show full text]