Mise En Page 1
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Report of the International Advisory Panel Integrated Growth Poles Project (IGP2) Projet Pôles Intégrés De Croissance (PIC) July 2014
Report of the International Advisory Panel Integrated Growth Poles Project (IGP2) Projet Pôles Intégrés de Croissance (PIC) July 2014 IAP Report to PIC July 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS/REMERCIEMENTS The Panel acknowledges the support of the National Project Secretariat (Secrétariat National du Projet) of the Pôles Intégrés de Croissance (PIC) Project and thanks the National Secretary (Secrétaire National du Projet) Eric Rakoto-Andriantsilavo for providing the assistance of his team in the Antananarivo headquarters office and in the poles of Fort Dauphin (Taolagnaro) and Nosy be. Rollis Rakotosamimanana in Fort Dauphin and Tsiong Hotunken in Nosy be organized and facilitated the Panel’s field visits to provide a comprehensive view of the Project in their particular poles. In particular, the Panel wishes to thank Harizo Rasolomanana, Environmental and Social Expert [Responsable Environnement et Social], for providing a wealth of supporting documents and history, for organizing the overall program and visits of the Panel and accompanying the Panel in a dedicated fashion on a daily basis during their visits and interviews in Antananarivo and in the two growth poles. The Panel also thanks the Comité de Suivi Environnementale Régionale (CSER) and the QIT Madagascar Minerals (QMM) team of Fort Dauphin. The Panel conducted its work in close collaboration with the PIC team. Nevertheless, the Panel takes responsibility for any errors of fact in the report and notes that the views expressed herein represent the independent conclusions of the Panel members. -
Document of the World Bank
Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: ICR00003490 IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION AND RESULTS REPORT (IDA 4101-MAG, 4399-MAG) ON A CREDIT Public Disclosure Authorized IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR107.6 MILLION (US$165 MILLION EQUIVALENT) TO THE REPUBLIC OF MADAGASCAR FOR THE INTEGRATED GROWTH POLES PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized JUNE 15, 2015 Trade & Competitiveness Global Practice Eastern and Southern Africa Department Africa Region Public Disclosure Authorized This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. i CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective June 15, 2015) Currency Unit = SDR SDR0,7121 = US$1 US$1.4044 = SDR 1 FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADEMA Aéroports de Madagascar AFD Agence Française de Développement AfDB African Development Bank AGOA African Growth and Opportunity Act APMF Agence Portuaire Maritime et Fluviale BDS Business Development Services BOO Build, Own, Operate CAS Country Assistance Strategy CCI Chamber of Commerce and Industry CGA Centre de Gestion Agréé CMU Country Management Unit CNaPS Caisse Nationale de Prévoyance Sociale CRDA Commission pour la Réforme du Droit des Affaires CTHT Centre de Technique Horticole de Tamatave DBI Doing Business Indicators EDBM Economic Development Board of Madagascar ERR Economic Rate of Return EOI Expression of Interest ESMF Environmental and Social -
Rp2400v40revis10box358336
MEF Public Disclosure Authorized REPOBLIKAN ‘ I MADAGASIKARA Tanindrazana-Fahafahana-Fandrosoana ---------------------- MINISTERE DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT ET DES FORETS ------------------ PROGRAMME ENVIRONNEMENTAL III ------------------ Public Disclosure Authorized MADAGASCAR NATIONAL PARKS Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized PLAN DE SAUVEGARDE SOCIALE ET ENVIRONNEMENTALE DE L’AIRE PROTEGEE LOKOBE Juin 2010 1 PSSE‐AIRE PROTEGEE LOKOBE SOMMAIRE 2 LISTE DES TABLEAUX .................................................................................................................................................................. i LISTE DES CARTES ...................................................................................................................................................................... iv LISTE DES FIGURES .................................................................................................................................................................... iv LISTE DES ILLUSTRATIONS ......................................................................................................................................................... iv LISTE DES ANNEXES ................................................................................................................................................................... iv ACRONYMES ET SIGLES ............................................................................................................................................................. -
Madagascar I Fifth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity – Madagascar I PREFACE
Fifth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity – Madagascar i Fifth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity – Madagascar i PREFACE The 5 th national report to the Convention on the biological diversity of Madagascar has a remarkably specific character following a context social, economic and political rather difficult to manage and persist that both during the implementation of its activities as the development of its content. But thanks to the good will to persevere all everyone involved closely or from afar, the report could still be developed and without having experienced various vicissitudes during the implementation of the activities set out. We know that the development of the content of this report is the result of a collaboration of about 200 people resources working in the field of biodiversity at the national level and willing to give a good image of the country commitments to the Convention on biological diversity signed by our country in 1997. We know that the various departmental sectors, institutions, associations, various NGOs, platforms and civil society itself are given hand to walk together towards the same direction, which is to give value to this unique heritage and yet in danger. Therefore, that collaboration should continue and be strengthened in the sense that the current national strategy update must also be the subject of concerted action of all stakeholders foregoing. We know that this report is far from perfect, but at least it reflects the reality lived by the biodiversity conservation malagasy between 2010-2013 unfortunately coinciding to the crisis which persist during the after 2009.