Delegated Report Sheet Application Number

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Delegated Report Sheet Application Number DELEGATED REPORT SHEET APPLICATION NUMBER: 20181869 ADDRESS: 43 Holman Close, Aylsham NR11 6DD PROPOSAL: Two Storey Extension and Material Alteration to elevations to the Existing Dwelling. SITE DESCRIPTION The application site is a detached dormer chalet located within the settlement limits of Aylsham. The site is within a residential area of mixture of detached and semi-detached dwellings and is located on a linear pattern. The application site is located to the west of the harmer head of Holman Close a cul de sac. To the west of the site is open field. Boundary treatment consists of 1 .6 close boarded fence to the north, west and south of the site and mature trees to the west of the site. THE PROPOSAL The Application seeks full planning permission for the erection of a two storey rear extension to the rear of the property and material alterations to elevations to the existing dwelling. PLANNING HISTORY There is no planning history on the site CONSULTATIONS: Parish Council: The Parish Council was consulted with regards to the proposed development and they noted “The Council considered the above numbered plan and have No OBJECTIONS to the proposal The Town Council has an adopted policy regarding lighting for any new planning application. This policy states the following: National Planning Policy Framework Clause 125 and Norfolk County Council‘s Environmental Lighting Zones Policy both recognise the importance of preserving dark landscapes and dark skies. In order to minimise light pollution, Aylsham Town Council recommend that any outdoor lights associated with this proposed development should be: 1. fully shielded (enclosed in full cut-off flat glass fitments) 2. directed downwards (mounted horizontally to the ground and not tilted upwards) 3. switched on only when needed (no dusk to dawn lamps) 4. white light low-energy lamps (LED, metal halide or fluorescent) and not orange or pink sodium sources The Town Council requests that this policy forms part of any planning approval in this application”. Environmental Health – Pollution Control Officer: The PCO was consulted with regards to the proposed extension and had no objections to the proposal. Neighbours: The neighbouring residents were consulted by letters of notification with regards to the proposed development. No representations have been received. PRE-APPLICATION ADVICE: No pre application advice was sought from the Planning Department prior to the submission of the application. POLICY FRAMEWORK: Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 states "if regard is to be had to the development plan for the purpose of any determination to be made under the planning Acts the determination must be, made in accordance with the plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise". The development plan for the Broadland District Council comprises of three main documents firstly the Joint Core Strategy for Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk [2014], secondly, The Broadland District Council Development Management Document DPD [2015] which outlines the District’s Development Management policies and thirdly the Site Allocations Development Plan [2016]. Section 70(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) provides that a local planning authority in determining planning applications must “have regard to the provisions of the development plan, so far as material to the application, and to any other material considerations”. Within Broadland District Council some parishes have neighbourhood plans that have been adopted through referendum as such these would be material consideration in making any decision within that particular parish. The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) [2018] sets out the overarching planning policies on the delivery of sustainable development through the planning system and reinforces the position that planning applications must be determined in accordance with the Development Plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise [paragraphs 2 & 47, [2018]]. The NPPF is a material consideration to be taken into account in all development proposals. The National Planning Practice Guidance adds further context to the National Planning Policy Framework [“NPPF”] and it is intended that the two documents should be read together. The guidance is also a ‘material consideration’ when taking decisions on planning applications. This means that if a local policy is deemed out of date, local authorities may be directed by the national guidance’s requirements. The following policies are relevant for the assessment of this application. Broadland District Council Development Management Council DPD [2015] GC1- Presumption in Favour of sustainable development GC4- Design TS3- Highway safety The Joint Core Strategy for Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk [2014] Policy 1- Addressing climate change and protecting environmental assets Policy 2- Promoting good design Impact to the character of the area The proposal would be located to the rear of the property No. 43 Holman Close as such would not be visible to the front. The dwellings on Holman Close are a mixture of semi-detached and detached dwellings and with reasonable large gardens. It is considered that by virtue of the scale, location, massing of the proposed extension would not have any adverse effects on the character of the area or the street scene. The proposed extension would not have a domineering impact to the existing dwelling as such would not have a significant visual impact to the character and appearance of the area and the host dwelling. The proposed extension would not be viewed in isolation from the host property. It is considered that the proposal would be subservient to the host property. It is considered that the proposal is acceptable and in compliance with policies GC1 and GC2 of Broadland District Council Development Management DPD [2015] and Policy 2 of the Joint Core Strategy for Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk [2014]. Impact to the neighbouring residential Amenity With regards to the neighbouring amenity, it is considered that the proposal would be located to the rear of the host property where there is adequate screening ( in the form of a mature trees to western boundary and 1.6 meter high Close boarded fence to the southern and northern boundaries) to neighbouring properties (northern boundary). It is considered that by virtue of its location (to the rear), massing, scale and height, the proposal would not have an adverse impact on residential amenity of neighbouring properties. To the west of the site is open field which would not be affected by the proposed extension. Furthermore, it is considered that due to adequate separation distance of approximately 48 metres to the neighbouring house Rowangarth [to the west of The Laurels on Heydon Road]. The proposed extension would not result in any significant amount of overlooking to the rear garden of No. 41 Holman Close. The proposed rear extension would be acceptable as it is considered that it would not be an incongruous feature to the rear of the host property to cause any disamenity to neighbouring residents. The comments from the Pollution Control officer are noted and it is considered that the proposal would not result in an adverse impact to the amenity of the neighbouring residents. Furthermore the proposal is not located in a polluted area and would not result in any kind of pollution. It is considered that the proposal would be acceptable and would be in accordance with policy GC4 of the Broadland District Council Development Management DPD [2015]. Impact on highway safety It is considered that the proposed extension due to its size would not increase traffic activities to the application site. The existing dwelling has two bedrooms and it is considered that the increase by one to make the dwelling a three bedroomed dormer bungalow would not necessarily create an increase in the volume of traffic on Holman Close which is a cul de sac. The proposed extension would not create conditions prejudicial to highway safety. It is considered that the proposal due to its location, size, scale and massing would not have a significant harmful impact to highways safety and would be compliant to TS3 of Broadland District Council Development Management DPD [2015]. CONCLUSION The proposal does not significantly harm the character of the existing dwelling or the surrounding area. It is also considered that there would be no adverse effect upon the levels of privacy currently enjoyed by the surrounding properties. It is considered that due to its size and scale the proposal would not have an adverse impact to amenity of neighbouring residents. The proposal is therefore considered to be acceptable and to accord with policies GC1, GC3 and TS3 of Broadland District Council Development Management DPD [2015] and Policies 1 and 2 of the Joint Core strategy for Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk [2014]. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that planning permission for two storey rear extension and material alterations to existing dwelling be granted subject to the following conditions. Conditions 1. The development to which this permission relates must be begun not later than THREE years beginning with the date on which this permission is granted. Reason The time limit is imposed in compliance with the requirements of Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. 2. The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out otherwise than in accordance with the plans and documents PL01 received on 19th November 2018 Reason For the avoidance of doubt and to ensure the satisfactory development of the site in accordance with the specified approved plans and documents 3. The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the extension hereby permitted shall match those of the existing building in colour and texture, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: In the interests of visual amenity and in order to comply with Policy GC4 of the Broadland District Council Development Management DPD [2014].
Recommended publications
  • Appeal Statement for 156 Wroxham Road, Sprowston, Norwich, NR7 8DE - Broadland District Council Application Number 20160492
    Appeal statement for 156 Wroxham Road, Sprowston, Norwich, NR7 8DE - Broadland District Council application number 20160492 In their Planning Rejection notice dated 9th February 2017, Broadland District Council states that “Wroxham Road is a long road which runs through the town of Sprowston and that the section between the Norwich Outer Ring Road and the Park and Ride roundabout is fronted by buildings of various periods and designs with various space intervals between the buildings on either side. Given this varied character and appearance, it is considered that number 156 is only read in conjunction with the neighbouring buildings on the same side of Wroxham Road between Merlin Avenue and Goshawk Mews (numbers 154a to 166 Wroxham Road)”. However, as Broadland District Council correctly point out, Wroxham Road is fronted by buildings of various periods and designs with various space intervals between the buildings on either side. Therefore, what relevant basis is there that this group of properties should be treated differently than the general area? In application number 20160492 for front, side and rear extensions to number 126 Wroxham Road approved by Broadland District Council 12th May 2016, the two storey side extension (which has now been constructed) is partly constructed not only up to the boundary between the two buildings but also within the grounds of the adjoining property number 124 Wroxham Road. Similar situations are apparent in the immediate vicinity and photographs are attached to this appeal document showing this to be the case. Numbers 114, 116, 136, 154, 156, 158, 169, 171, 175, 207 Wroxham Road and 47 Merlin Mews are all examples of extensions being constructed neither on or very close to the neighbouring property.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadland District Council Landscape Character Assessment
    Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Landscape Character Assessment Documents 1. Broadland District Council Part 2 of 5 Applicant: Norfolk Vanguard Limited Document Reference: ExA; ISH; 10.D3.1E 1.2 Deadline 3 Date: February 2019 Photo: Kentish Flats Offshore Wind Farm KEY Study Area Boundary Broads Authority Area National Landscape Character Types RBEAylsham Physiography (1st letter) RCE L Lowlands Reepham R Intermediate RBD Landcover (2nd letter) B Other Light Land RDS Wroxham C Clayland D Heath & Moorland W Wetland LWS Cultural Pattern (3rd letter) D Dispersed unwooded RBD Acle Norwich E Wooded - estateland Brundall S Wooded - secondary W Wetland/waste unwooded LWW 0 2 4 Km This map is based on Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Broadland District Council OS Licence No. 100018156. S:\projects\11107301 Broadland LCA\GIS\Projects\Figs_0208\11107301_Fig_3-2_Nat_landscape_typology.mxd FIGURE 3.2 CHRIS BLANDFORD ASSOCIATES www.cba.uk.net BROADLAND DISTRICT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT NATIONAL LANDSCAPE MARCH 2008 TYPOLOGY KEY Study Area Boundary Broads Authority Area LWT/MFS County Landscape Typology LWT/MFS LWT/MFS NATURAL LWT/urban LWT/MFS Aylsham Geology/Physiography (1st letter) RCG/CFA RSB/urban RSB/CFT F - Fluvial Drift RSB/CFA LWT/MFS RSB/SFS L - Vales & Valleys R - Rolling lowland Reepham RSB/CST LWT/MSS Rock Type (2nd
    [Show full text]
  • Aylsham Conservation Area Appraisal
    AYLSHAM CONSERVATION AREA CHARACTER STATEMENT BROADLAND DISTRICT COUNCIL MARCH 2008 If you would like this information in a different format, such as large print, audio, Braille or in a different language please call (01603) 431133 and we will do our best to help. www.broadland.gov.uk CONTENTS CONSERVATION AREA CHARACTER STATEMENT: AYLSHAM CHARACTER APPRAISAL CONTENTS Introduction 2 Conservation Area Boundaries 2 Historical Development 3 Location And Setting 4 Form And Character 4 The Town Centre 5 Drabblegate 11 Things Which Detract From The Character Of The Area 12 Opportunities To Enhance The Character Of The Area 13 APPENDICES APPENDIX A The effect of Designation 16 APPENDIX B Listed buildings in the conservation area 19 APPENDIX C Unlisted buildings of interest 22 APPENDIX D Significant trees, not the subject of Tree Preservation Orders 24 APPENDIX E Plan showing Conservation Area Boundary 27 1 IINTRODUCTION CONSERVATION AREA CHARACTER STATEMENT: AYLSHAM INTRODUCTION CONSERVATION AREA A Conservation Area is defined as “an area of BOUNDARIES special architectural or historic interest, the character of which it is desirable to preserve or The present Statement identifies and reaffirms enhance”. The conservation of the historic the special architectural and historic character environment can enhance the quality of life of of the area identified in the earlier Statement those who live or work in the area and, by and of the various extensions to it. attracting visitors, can benefit the local economy. Under the 1990 Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act, Local Authorities are required to review existing Conservation Areas and, where appropriate, consider the designation of new ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Download: Broadland District Councillor Names and Addresses File Type
    Broadland District Councillors 3 vacancies as at 17 August 2021 Key Ward & Party (BCG) Broadland Conservative Group (LD) Liberal Democrat (BLG) Labour Cllr A D Adams 72 Reepham Road, Hellesdon, Norwich, NR6 5LT Taverham North Tel: 01603 405367 (BCG) [email protected] Cllr S C Beadle Old Kings Head, Haveringland, Norwich, NR10 4PT Reepham Tel: 01603 755373 (LD) [email protected] Cllr N J Brennan c/o Broadland District Council Blofield with South Thorpe Lodge, 1 Yarmouth Road, Norwich, NR7 0DU Walsham [email protected] (BCG) Cllr D J Britcher 33 Sadler Road, Hellesdon, Norwich, NR6 6PQ Hellesdon South Tel: 01603 416208 East [email protected] (LD) Cllr P E Bulman Tower Barn, Heydon Road, Heydon, Norwich, NR11 6RX Great Tel: 01263 584215 Witchingham Mob: 07775 697458 (BCG) [email protected] Cllr S J Catchpole 25 Burgh Road, Aylsham, Norwich, NR11 6AT Aylsham Tel: 01263 734192 (LD) [email protected] Cllr S M Clancy 53 The Street, Felthorpe, Norwich, NR10 4AB Taverham South Tel: 01603 754148 (BCG) Mob: 07837 299753 [email protected] Cllr B Cook c/o Broadland District Council Sprowston Central Thorpe Lodge, 1 Yarmouth Road, Norwich, NR7 0DU (BLG) [email protected] Cllr J K Copplestone Breck Farm, Reepham Road, Swannington, Norwich, Coltishall NR9 5TB (BCG) Tel: 01603 860840 Mob: 07771 540259
    [Show full text]
  • Upton-Report-2017
    Upton with Fishley Parish Council Report to Chairman Parish Councillors and Residents 2017 Frank O'Neill - Broadland District Council Member for Blofield with South Walsham Date: 20 April 2017 This is my second Annual Report since I was elected to represent residents of Blofield with South Walsham. The Ward encompasses the following parishes: Blofield to include Blofield Heath; Hemblington; South Walsham; Upton with Fishley and Woodbastwick to include Ranworth, Panxworth. Quite what should go into this report I am still not sure. What follows is therefore a potpourri of events and issues that have drawn my attention through the year. Property development within the villages is an issue that always focuses attention. Change is not always good but some change is inevitable. Of course the greatest development activity is in Blofield but other parishes are not immune. I will not dwell on individual cases where the issues and outcomes are already known. This report comes primarily to the elected representatives of this parish. It is with them I have most regular contact. through the year. Might I ask that this report is published on the Parish web site for circulation in the wider community? I would be grateful. INDEX Elected Councillor Allowances Devolution & The Mayor Greater Norwich Local Plan Neighbourhood Plans Planning Enforcement Food Hub Business Rates & Council Tax Pedestrian Street Lighting Major Roads o NDR o A47 Improvements NORSE Services o Garden Waste Disposal o Recycling Congratulations o Community at Heart Awards o Chairman of the Council o Sunday Times Best Company Water in the Carburettor Elected Councillor Allowances Before I was elected.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes to Our Services Why Not Get
    July 2020 Changes to our Gardening Why not get services competition - involved? Page 4 - 5 results! Page 15 Page 13 Door to Door / July 2020 Thank you for your support! 2020 will probably not go down in many people’s estimation as a favourite year and we are only halfway through! The Coronavirus pandemic, and the Government’s restrictions, presented us all with an extraordinary set of curbs on our daily lives. At Broadland we had to change the way we work overnight. This has meant that we had to ask for a lot of patience and understanding from our tenants. Elaine and Michael sanitising communal touch surfaces in Dereham We had to suspend our routine repair service and instead focus only on emergency and urgent repairs - those that most impacted on your ability to live in your homes. Between lockdown and the start of June, we undertook almost 1,540 such repairs. A key priority was ensuring adequate cleaning and sanitising programmes in sheltered schemes, and communal areas in places such as flats, to reduce the risk of casual transmission of the virus. By 1 June, we had completed more than 1,000 additional cleaning visits. Despite the pandemic, we continued to prioritise compliance checks, including gas servicing. I know that some tenants have been unwilling to allow us into their homes, as they were shielding. This does mean that some gas checks are overdue, which worries me. I hope that we can find a way to catch up on the outstanding gas servicing visits before the end of August, ideally in July! Our offices remain closed for the foreseeable future.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation Report Into the Flooding in Broadland Various in 2013- 2016 Report Reference: FIR037 Report Prepared by Nathalie Harris and Published on 16 August 2019
    Investigation Report into the flooding in Broadland Various in 2013- 2016 Report Reference: FIR037 Report prepared by Nathalie Harris and Published on 16 August 2019 1 Executive Summary (a) Flooding incidents and causes This report includes the internal flooding of 36 properties and highway flooding of 3 roads over a series of dates ranging from 2013-2016. Principally those included in this report are individual properties located across Broadland District within the following parishes: • Acle • Beighton • Blofield • Buxton with Lammas • Foulsham • Great and Little Plumstead • Hellesdon • Horsford • Lingwood & Burlingham • Newton St Faith • Pettywell • Reepham • Salhouse • Strumpshaw • Wroxham Catchments: • Hellesdon • Lackford Run • Reepham Beck The flooding that occurred was caused by: • Drainage system overloaded • Increased run-off • Drainage system or outfall blockage, unmaintained or obstructed • Surface run-off from roads • Surcharging of the drainage system; Entry of flood water into property • Property(ies) had structural issues • Neighbouring property • Obstruction of surface run-off flow paths by structures • Obstruction of surface run-off flow paths by debris. This led to the internal flooding of 36 properties. (b) Key recommendations Risk Management Authorities should; • Communicate with affected residents where their assets have given rise to the flooding of properties. • Review the appropriateness of their response to flooding. 2 • Determine the integrity and/or capacity of their assets and their maintenance where they have contributed to the flooding of properties to understand the systems role in accommodating rainfall events as well as mitigating flooding. Property owners of affected properties should; • Confirm the integrity, capacity and appropriateness of their property drainage • Determine if works are needed to remove the risk posed by structures that form obstructions to flows.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Core Strategy for Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk, Broadland Part of Norwich Policy Area Examination
    Joint Core Strategy for Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk, Broadland Part of Norwich Policy Area Examination Inspector: David Vickery DIPT&CP MRTPI Programme Officer: Annette Feeney Ms Sandra Eastaugh Greater Norwich Development Partnership Manager SENT VIA EMAIL 3 June 2013 Dear Ms Eastaugh I have read your informative letter of 31 May 2013 which outlines the approach the Councils are proposing to take towards the financial viability work. As you know, I have advised that the work should be proportionate and realistic to the level that is needed to deliver the infrastructure, housing, and employment elements proposed in this Local Plan. This is a Plan which is, of course, set at a strategic level, albeit that details are available of many of the costs and sites involved. The viability evidence is needed to show that the proposals are realistic and capable of delivery at the appropriate time. The approach you have suggested is a sensible one given the strategic nature of the Plan and what is presently known about how it would be implemented, and given that many of the policies that affect financial viability are already adopted. The use of site typologies is appropriate, although I do not have the information at this stage of the Examination to comment on how you have selected or produced them. I am pleased to read that the commentary report will be relatively short, and that the technical work will be kept to its appendices. I assume that the 25ha of proposed employment land in the Plan will be included either within the "mixed urban quarters" site typologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Broomhill Lane, Reepham
    Broomhill Lane, Reepham Design & Access Statement March 2020 013-19-R1000_P1 ContentsCONTENTS The Team 3 Development Description:Development Development Description: of 141 new XXXXXXXXXXXXXX Executive Summary 4 dwellings with parking and associated amenity and Local Planning Authority: Site Location 5 open space. XXXXXXXXXXXXXX Local Context 6 Local PlanningApplicant: Authority: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXBroadland District Council Historical Context 7 Site Context 8-11 Applicant: Lovell Homes Facilities 12 Local Amenities 13 Architectural Context 14 Public Consultation 15-16 Design Evolution 17 Design Development 18-23 Master Planning 24-25 Refuse 26 Parking 27 Landscape Concept 28 Character Design 29 Materials 30 House Type Design 31 Street Scenes 32 3D Model 33-34 3D Visualization 35 Conclusion 36 THE TEAM Applicants Architectural Design Lovell Homes WT Design Ltd Norwich Lakeside 500 Unit 1 Broadland Business Park Burlingham Business Centre Old Chapel Way North Burlingham Thorpe St Andrew Norfolk Norwich NR13 4TA NR7 0WG Landscape Architect Planning Authority James Blake Associates Ltd The Black Barn Broadland District Council Hall Road Thorpe Lodge, Lavenham 1 Yarmouth Road, Suffolk Norwich, CO10 9QX NR7 0DU Planning Consultant Highways & Transportation, Drainage Bidwells Rossi Long 16 Upper King Street 16 Meridian Way, Norwich Norwich, NR3 1HA NR7 0TA 3 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Design and Access Statement accompanies This document aims to describe the key issues the full planning application submitted on taken into consideration with regard to the behalf of Lovell Homes which seeks approval for design and key principles that will be applied to a residential development on designated land the layout and design of the scheme. off Broomhill Lane, Reepham.
    [Show full text]
  • News and Information from Your Local Council Spring 2021
    news Broadland News and information from your local council Spring 2021 @BroadlandDC BroadlandDistrictCouncil Ready, steady, census The decennial census is almost upon us. Households across Broadland will soon be asked to take part in the nationwide survey of housing and the population. It has been carried out every decade since 1801, with the exception of 1941. Information from the digital-first census will help decide how services are planned and funded in your local area. This could mean things like doctors’ surgeries, housing or new bus routes. Households will receive a letter with a unique access code in the post, allowing them to complete their questionnaire online. Paper questionnaires will be available on request. Census day is Sunday 21 March. For more information, visit census.gov.uk Broadland News is distributed to over 62,500 homes and businesses in the Broadland district, three times a year. Useful contacts Advertisements featured in Broadland News do not mean Broadland District Council the Council endorses those Mon – Fri 8.30am – 5pm companies or services in any Main switchboard: 01603 431133 way. Broadland News is printed Benefits 01603 430602 [email protected] on paper made from recycled material. Events and services are Building control - CNC Building Control correct at time of printing but 08081 685041 (Freephone) [email protected] may change. Council Tax 01603 430600 [email protected] Editorial Election services 01603 430483 [email protected] Marketing and Communications Environmental services (bins, recycling, waste, dog fouling) Team, Thorpe Lodge, 1 Yarmouth 01603 430534 [email protected] Road, Norwich, NR7 0DU.
    [Show full text]
  • New Development Comprising New
    New Development Comprising New Development Comprising Offices, Convenience Food Store, Care Home, assisted Flats Housing, Club House/ Assembly Room And Assisted Single Storey Housing Old Station Yard, REEPHAM Design and Access Statement May 2018 Design and Access Statement - Old Station Yard - REEPHAM Introduction The Eastern Boundary is the Main Road from Reepham to the adjoining village of Cawston and the market town This design and access statement has been prepared of Aylsham. It is bounded on this side by Housing. to accompany a Full Planning Application for a new Food Retail Store, Offices and Care Village together with The Southern Boundary is bounded by a village access associated infrastructure, landscaping and play space. road and housing. The South Western edge adjoins a large Public open space known as Stimpsons Piece. The purpose of this document is to explain the rationale behind design proposals forming part of the planning The Western Boundary has a private house albeit some application and follows guidelines set in ‘Design and distance away. The immediate boundary is a public access statements: How to write, read and use them’ footway between Marriots Way and Stoney Lane to the published by CABE. These guidelines set up an Public open space. assessment-involvement-evaluation-design process which explain how the final design has been informed by The Proposed development will integrate with the the wider context of the site in terms of its physical, existing established area both functionally and physically. social, economic and planning policy context; how the The bigger site presently has a large warehouse sited to final design has considered and responded to different its centre which is now a retail unit known as Kerries opportunities and constraints surrounding the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Sewell Meadow, Old Catton
    TRAVEL PLAN SEWELL MEADOW, OLD CATTON Project No.: PT2025 | Our Ref No.: SM ITP V1 February 2020 Norfolk County Council Interim Residential Travel Plan, February 2020 Planning ref: Broadland 20141955 A COMMITMENT TO DELIVER The AtoBetter programme is working with communities and a variety of delivery partners to promote a range of travel choices and enable individuals to walk, cycle, use public transport or car share for more of their journeys. The programme is being delivered in partnership by Norfolk County Council and WSP, and aims to create an ethos whereby healthy, active and sustainable travel become the norm. Ian Dinmore Dorothy Bryant Norfolk County Council AtoBetter Delivery Team Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] TRAVEL PLAN Project No.: PT2025 | Our Ref No.: SM ITP V1 February 2020 Norfolk County Council DOCUMENT CONTROL Record of Issue Version Status Author Checked NCC Checked Date NCC Approved Date 1 Draft CG SB 2 Final DB SB 28 Feb 2020 28 Feb 2020 This report was prepared by the AtoBetter team for Norfolk County Council. The disclosure of any information contained in this report is the sole responsibility of the intended recipient. The material in it reflects the AtoBetter team’s best judgement in light of the information available to it at the time of preparation. Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it, are the responsibility of such third parties. AtoBetter accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report.
    [Show full text]