DOCSLIB.ORG

Air Quality Modified

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Air Quality Modified Lake Powell Pipeline Modified Draft Study Report 1 Air Quality January 2012 Lake Powell Pipeline 1/27/12 Modified Draft Air Quality Study Report Utah Board of Water Resources This Page Intentionally Left Blank Lake Powell Pipeline 1/27/12 Modified Draft Air Quality Study Report Utah Board of Water Resources Modified Draft Air Quality Study Report Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ ES-1 ES-1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. ES-1 ES-2 Methodology ................................................................................................................ ES-1 ES-3 Key Results of the Air Quality Impact Analysis.......................................................... ES-1 ES-3.1 Water Conveyance System / Cedar Valley Pipeline System .......................... ES-1 ES-3.2 Hydro System – Existing Highway Alternative .............................................. ES-1 ES-3.3 Hydro System – South Alternative / Southeast Corner Alternative ................ ES-2 ES-3.4 Transmission Line Alternatives ...................................................................... ES-2 ES-3.5 Natural Gas Supply Line and Generators Alternative .................................... ES-2 ES-3.6 Indirect Effects from LPP Project from Population Growth ........................... ES-2 ES-3.7 No Lake Powell Water Alternative ................................................................. ES-2 ES-3.8 No Action Alternative ..................................................................................... ES-3 ES-3.9 Air Quality Impacts Resulting from Additional Power Demand .................... ES-3 Chapter 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Summary Description of Alignment Alternatives ......................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 South Alternative .............................................................................................. 1-1 1.2.2 Existing Highway Alternative .......................................................................... 1-8 1.2.3 Southeast Corner Alternative ............................................................................ 1-8 1.2.4 Transmission Line Alternatives ...................................................................... 1-10 1.2.5 Natural Gas Supply Line and Generators Alternative .................................... 1-17 1.2.5.1 Natural Gas Transmission Line Connection ................................... 1-17 1.2.5.2 Natural Gas Supply Line ................................................................ 1-17 1.2.5.3 Natural Gas Generators .................................................................. 1-20 1.3 Summary Description of No Lake Powell Water Alternative ..................................... 1-22 1.3.1 WCWCD No Lake Powell Water Alternative ................................................ 1-23 1.3.2 CICWCD No Lake Powell Water Alternative ................................................ 1-23 1.3.3 KCWCD No Lake Powell Water Alternative ................................................. 1-24 1.4 Summary Description of the No Action Alternative ................................................... 1-24 1.4.1 WCWCD No Action Alternative .................................................................... 1-24 1.4.2 CICWCD No Action Alternative .................................................................... 1-25 1.4.3 KCWCD No Action Alternative ..................................................................... 1-25 1.5 Identified Issues ........................................................................................................... 1-25 1.5.1 Purposes of Study ........................................................................................... 1-25 1.5.2 Identified Issues .............................................................................................. 1-26 1.6 Impact Topics .............................................................................................................. 1-26 Chapter 2 Methodology ................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 General ........................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Data Used ....................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 Agency Resource Management Goals .............................................................. 2-2 Lake Powell Pipeline i 1/27/12 Modified Draft Air Quality Study Report Utah Board of Water Resources 2.2.1.1 UDEQ – Division of Air Quality ...................................................... 2-2 2.2.1.2 ADEQ – Air Quality Division .......................................................... 2-2 2.2.1.3 EPA .................................................................................................. 2-2 2.2.1.4 Kaibab Band of Paiute Indians ......................................................... 2-3 2.2.1.5 Bureau of Land Management (BLM) ............................................... 2-3 2.2.1.6 National Park Service ....................................................................... 2-3 2.2.1.7 Bureau of Reclamation ..................................................................... 2-3 2.2.1.8 Southern Utah Air Quality Task Force ............................................. 2-3 2.2.1.9 Five County Association, Counties, and Local Agencies Information ....................................................................................... 2-3 2.3 Assumptions................................................................................................................... 2-4 2.3.1 Impact Corridor................................................................................................. 2-5 2.4 Impact Analysis Methodology ....................................................................................... 2-5 2.4.1 Review Existing Information ............................................................................ 2-6 2.4.2 Field Investigations ........................................................................................... 2-6 2.4.3 Perceived Aesthetic Valuable Areas ................................................................. 2-6 2.4.4 Equipment Estimates and Emissions ................................................................ 2-6 2.4.4.1 Particulate Matter (PM) Calculations ............................................... 2-8 2.4.5 Review Air Quality Dispersion Models ............................................................ 2-8 2.4.6 Construction Air Quality Calculations .............................................................. 2-9 2.4.6.1 Particulate Matter (PM10) ................................................................. 2-9 2.4.6.2 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) ................................................................... 2-9 2.4.6.3 Carbon Monoxide (CO) .................................................................... 2-9 2.4.6.4 Other Pollutants .............................................................................. 2-10 2.4.7 Operations Air Quality Calculations ............................................................... 2-10 Chapter 3 Affected Environment (Baseline Conditions) ............................................................ 3-1 3.1 Impact Area .................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Overview of Baseline Conditions .................................................................................. 3-1 3.2.1 Baseline Conditions .......................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.1.1 Dense Population Areas ................................................................... 3-1 3.2.1.2 Historical Air Quality (Baseline) ...................................................... 3-1 3.2.1.3 Meteorological Characteristics ......................................................... 3-3 3.3 Overview of LPP Project Conditions ............................................................................. 3-4 3.3.1 Air Pollutants of Concern ................................................................................. 3-4 3.3.1.1 Fugitive Dust and Particulate Matter ................................................ 3-4 3.3.1.2 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) ................................................................. 3-11 3.3.1.3 Carbon Monoxide (CO) .................................................................. 3-12 3.3.1.4 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) and Other Pollutants .................................... 3-12 3.3.2 Nonattainment Areas ...................................................................................... 3-12 3.3.3 Operations Air Quality Calculations ............................................................... 3-12 3.3.4 Construction of Pipelines and Facilities ......................................................... 3-23 3.3.5 Construction of Transmission Lines ............................................................... 3-23
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Case Study in Utah
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Plan B and other Reports Graduate Studies 5-2018 Assessing Variation in Air Quality Perception: A Case Study in Utah Karen Jayne Mendenhall Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/gradreports Part of the Geography Commons Recommended Citation Mendenhall, Karen Jayne, "Assessing Variation in Air Quality Perception: A Case Study in Utah" (2018). All Graduate Plan B and other Reports. 1237. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/gradreports/1237 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Plan B and other Reports by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ASSESSING VARIATION IN AIR QUALITY PERCEPTION: A CASE STUDY IN UTAH by Karen J. Mendenhall March 6, 2018 A capstone report submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF NATURAL RESOURCES Committee Members: Dr. Peter D. Howe, Chair Dr. Christopher Lant Dr. Nancy O. Mesner UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2018 ABSTRACT In recent years, Utah has experienced poor air quality due to pollution-trapping winter inversions and summer ozone pollution. The resulting impacts of poor air quality include health issues, reduced visibility, economic impacts and ecological impacts. Utah’s topography and exploding urban population are factors which increase human exposure to these adverse impacts of air pollution. It is important for State and local governments to understand how people perceive air quality so that clean air campaigns target those who are most likely to foster pro- environmental behaviors.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Contact Rikki Hrenko-Browning [email protected] 435-219-0963 Investments in Utah's Air Quality Continue
    Media Contact Rikki Hrenko-Browning [email protected] 435-219-0963 Investments in Utah’s Air Quality Continue Oil and gas sector continue to expand Tier 3 fuels production, partnering with Utah to drive statewide air quality improvements Salt Lake City, Utah (March 31, 2020) — With HollyFrontier’s announcement to produce Tier 3 fuels at their Woods Cross refinery, Utah’s petroleum industry is celebrating increased Tier 3 fuel capacity and strides made to improve air quality across the state. Moves by Utah refineries to invest and produce Tier 3 drives air quality benefits locally (rather than at out of state facilities) to meet the Environmental Protection Agency’s low sulfur standards, and responds to Governor Gary Herbert’s and our legislature’s leadership on air quality and ozone issues. Today’s announcement is more evidence that industry is stepping up to partner with policymakers, regulators and consumers to improve the environment and everyone’s quality of life. “I would like to thank Governor Herbert, our legislators, and state policymakers in Salt Lake City who continue to prioritize cleaner air in Utah,” said Rikki Hrenko-Browning, President of the Utah Petroleum Association. “I know I speak for the Utah oil and gas employees when I say how proud I am to see our industry actively prioritizing the state’s air quality through homegrown solutions such as Tier 3 fuels.” In Utah, vehicles account for approximately one half of all emissions. Along the Wasatch Front, vehicles represent the largest source of pollution during seasonal inversions and ozone events. “I am pleased to join with all Utahns in my appreciation for HollyFrontier's announcement that they are supporting clean air and better health through the production of low-sulfur Tier 3 gasoline.
    [Show full text]
  • Steven Stuart Brown
    Steven Stuart Brown NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Phone: (303) 497 6306 Chemical Sciences Division FAX: (303) 497 5126 R/CSD7 [email protected] 325 Broadway https://esrl.noaa.gov/csd/staff/ Boulder, CO, 80305 USA steven.s.brown/ Education Ph.D., University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 1996 Thesis advisor: F. Fleming Crim B.A., Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 1989 Graduated Summa Cum Laude, Phi Beta Kappa Professional Experience September 2019 – present Tropospheric Chemistry Program, NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory Acting Program Leader October 2005 – present NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Research Chemist June 2014 – present Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado Adjoint Professor October 2000 – September 2005 NOAA Aeronomy Laboratory, Boulder, CO, and Cooperative Institute for Research in the Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Research Scientist October 1997-September 2000 NOAA Aeronomy Laboratory, Boulder, CO National Research Council Senior Research Fellow with Dr. A. R. Ravishankara Honors and Awards NOAA Bronze Medal Award (Highest level granted by the Undersecretary for Oceans and Atmospheres), 2020 NOAA Bronze Medal Award (Highest level granted by the Undersecretary for Oceans and Atmospheres), 2018 NOAA Office of Atmospheric Research, Best Scientific Paper Award, 2017 Harold I. Schiff Lecture, York University, Toronto, Ontario, 2015 Colorado Governor’s Award for High Impact Research, 2014 McElvain Lecture, University of Wisconsin, 2013 CIRES Outstanding Performance Award, University of Colorado, 2003 Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, 2002 National Research Council Post-Doctoral Fellowship, 1997-2000 Proctor & Gamble Fellowship, University of Wisconsin, 1994 – 1995 National Science Foundation Predoctoral Fellowship, 1991-1994 1 University of Wisconsin University Fellowship, 1990-1991 Samuel M.
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing Air Quality Home
    Research Report Report Number 738, February 2016 Bringing Air Quality Home Reducing Residential Emissions Bryson Garbett, Chairman The mission of Utah Foundation is to promote a thriving Brent Jensen, Vice Chairman economy, a well-prepared workforce, and a high quality Douglas Matsumori, Treasurer of life for Utahns by performing thorough, well-supported Stephen J. Hershey Kroes, President research that helps policymakers, business and community Shawn Teigen, Research Director leaders, and citizens better understand complex issues 10 West Broadway, Suite 307, Salt Lake City, UT 84101 and providing practical, well-reasoned recommendations 801.355.1400 • utahfoundation.org for policy change. Bringing Air Quality Home Research Report 1 Bringing Air Quality Home Reducing Residential Emissions Many Utahns consider air quality an important factor in determining quality of life and would support actions to improve air quality. Oil refineries and other industrial polluters, as well as passenger vehicles, have been the focus of federal, state, and local government regulation, yet there has been little focus in Utah about reducing pollution generated from commercial and residential buildings. Emissions from buildings contribute substantially to Utah’s pollution, particularly during the winter when they produce as much as 60% of certain pollutants. As planned regulations on vehicles come into effect, residential buildings will emit a greater share of the pollution. This report summarizes some actions that could reduce the pollution generated from buildings. KEY FINDINGS • Updating Utah’s building code will save buyers of newly built homes an estimated $3,750 over the course of 30 years. • Were ultra-low NOx water heaters the standard between 2012 and 2014 there would have been 10 fewer instances of PM2.5 exceeding federal guidelines, a 20% reduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Kerry E. Kelly, PE, Ph.D
    Kerry E. Kelly, P.E., Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Chemical Engineering University of Utah, 2288 MEB 3290 MEB, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 (801) 587-7601 (tel); (801) 585-1456 (fax) [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D., 2015, Environmental Engineering, University of Utah M.S. 1992, Environmental Engineering, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill B.S. 1988, Chemical Engineering, Purdue University PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2015-present, Assistant Professor, Chemical Engineering 2013-present, Associate Director, Program for Air Quality, Health and Society 2010-2015, Research Associate, Chemical Engineering and Institute for Clean & Secure Energy and Chemical Engineering, University of Utah 2002-2010, Associate Director, Institute for Combustion & Energy Studies, University of Utah 2000-2010, Research Engineer, Institute for Combustion & Energy Studies, University of Utah 1996-2000, Research Engineer, University of Tennessee 1994-1996, Scientist, Fraunhofer Institute for Atmospheric Environmental Research (Germany) 1992-1993, Process Engineer, Radian Corp. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS AIChE Division Director and Area Chair (2018 – present); AAAR Newsletter associate editor (2019 – present); AAAR health effects of aerosols working group chair (2017 – 2019); Utah State Air Quality Policy Board (2017 – present); Utah State Air Quality Board (Vice Chair, 2009 - 2017); Salt Lake City Air Quality Advisory Committee (2016 – present); Utah Air Quality / Changing Climate Technical Advisory Team (2019-2020), Air & Waste Management Association, Great Basin Chapter Advisory Board (2007 – 2011); Utah DEQ Carbon Capture Advisory Committee; University of Utah Office of Sustainability Advisory Committee; University of Utah Clean Air Task Force, and Utah DEQ Clean Utah Partners Advisory Board. PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS AND CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS My graduate students are underlined and my undergraduate research assistants are italicized and underlined.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Handouts.Pdf
    HEBER CITY POLICY STATEMENT: ESTABLISHING PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE DISTRICTS This policy statement addresses the criteria under which Heber City will consider applications for proposed Public Infrastructure Districts (the “District”). Compliance with these criteria shall not obligate the City to approve formation of the District. The Governing Document will be subject to approval by the City in both form and substance. The criteria are intended to serve as guidelines for the review of letters of intent and Governing Documents. The purpose of the Public Infrastructure District (PID) tool is to fund infrastructure. Initial, upfront costs of development can be significant, and the PID tool partially alleviates these costs. In addition, the relative cost savings associated with the funding is intended to help expedite development, create more desirable properties with notable amenities, and permit for development where typical market conditions may not permit construction. Ultimate PID costs are paid for by the end user, and PID financing is not a financial obligation of the jurisdictional entity. Consequently, Heber City Corporation is not responsible for debt payments associated with any approved Public Infrastructure District. For Heber City, the PID tool may help to accomplish key considerations of the city vision. As captured in the “Envision Heber 2050” comprehensive plan, Heber has adopted the following framework in relation to development: Preserve the open lands that surround Heber Create friendly neighborhoods and centers that focus
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Division of Air Quality 2020 Annual Report
    Utah Division of Air Quality 2020 Annual Report Division of Air Quality –2020 Annual Report Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 2020 Synopsis ........................................................................................................................... 2 Air Quality Standards ................................................................................................................. 4 Ambient Air Quality in Utah ........................................................................................................ 7 Utah’s Air Monitoring Network .................................................................................................. 7 NAAQS Nonattainment & Maintenance Areas .......................................................................... 8 Criteria Air Pollutants .................................................................................................................. 11 Carbon Monoxide (CO) ............................................................................................................. 11 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) ........................................................................................................... 13 Ozone (O3) ............................................................................................................................ 15 Particulate Matter (PM) .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NOVEMBER 1971 Official Publication of the WASATCH MOUNTAIN CLUB Salt Lake City, Utah
    NOVEMBER 1971 Official publication of THE WASATCH MOUNTAIN CLUB Salt Lake City, Utah with the leader. Adequate equip­ ment is an absolute must. You cannot participate in these events if you have not shown your ability lub on other hiking activities and if you do not have adequate and well broken in boots with good Vibram act· type soles and suitable protective clothing. Special equipment like an ice axe etc. may also be speci­ fied and you are required to be able to handle such equipment. Re­ member that these restrictions are set for your own safety and that of your fellow members. For rules re­ garding participation of children consult the May Rambler. · Register for bus trips with the leader only by sending a deposit to the address REGISTRATION INFORMATION: Regis­ listed. Leaders cannot register tration is generally not required anyone without a deposit. for members participating in easy or intermediate hiking (Rating For bus trip cancellations less below 7.0). Unless specifically than a week prior to the trip, the stated, advanced hikes (Rating Club must retain a $5.00 registra­ above 7.0) require registration tion fee, Nov. 4 ICE SKATING. Strengthen those ankles for skiing by taking Thurs. a few turns on the ice at Hygeia, 1224 E. 21st South. Skating is from 8 to 10 (if you can last that long) and then it's only a short jump to the Hacienda for beer. If 12 people show, we get a discount admission rate bringing it to 75¢. So meet just inside the door before 8:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • YOUTH and the MOUNTAINS Student Papers on Sustainable Mountain Development
    YOUTH AND THE MOUNTAINS Student Papers on Sustainable Mountain Development Volume III 2015 Editorial Board •EDITORIAL BOARD Editor-in-Chief: Dr. David R. Connelly Assistant Editor/Content & Design Kimberly Williamson Associate Editors: Dr. Rusty Butler, Utah Valley University Dr. Keith Snedegar, Utah Valley University Dr. Baktybek Abdrisaev, Utah Valley University Dr. Alex Yuan, Utah Valley University Robin Bucaria, Copper Hills High School Content Editors: Bethany McBeth, Utah Valley University Chessa Heap Stott, Utah Valley University Tony Medina, Utah Valley University Christian Jensen, Utah Valley University 801-863-8415 Published: March 1, 2017 Printed by Utah Valley University Press 800 University Parkway MS 187 Orem, Utah 84058 USA Youth And the Mountains Student Articles on Sustainable Mountain Development Youth and the Mountains is a journal composed of student arti- cles on sustainable mountain development. The journal is sup- ported by the Department of History and Political Science, in the College of Humanities and Social Sciences, as well as the President’s office at Utah Valley University (UVU). The Journal is an undergraduate publication with the aim of providing a forum for undergraduate students to share research and encourage ac- tive pursuit of quality academic scholarship. Students who have questions about the Journal, or those wishing to make a contri- bution (IE: filling staff positions or submitting a manuscript for review), should contact the Editor-in-Chief, David Connelly by e-mail at: [email protected] with the subject line of JOURNAL SUBMISSION. If you would like to see previous issues go to: http://www.uvu.edu/hps/student/youthjournal.html Table of Contents Introduction Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • June,30,2016
    Celebrating 125 years as Davis County’s news source Fire safety key during fireworks The season Davis Clipper ON A3 75 cents VOL. 124 NO. 70 THURSDAY, JUNE 30, 2016 Independence Day fun in Davis BY JENNIFFER WARDELL July 2 opens up with the city’s annual Fourth Clipper Staff Writer of July parade, which will follow the traditional route. That will be followed by more food and activities at the park. On July 4, there will be a There’s no shortage of fun this flag raising at 7 a.m. at West Bountiful City Hall July 4. (550 N. 800 West). Centerville Cities all across the county There will be activities in Founder’s Park have a host of events planned for (300 N. 100 East) from 5-9 p.m. on July 2, with the children’s parade starting at 6 p.m. in the Golden Independence Day, with some church parking lot at 160 S. 200 East (must be activities starting as early as July there by 5:30 p.m. to participate). The city’s Knights fly annual concert in the park, featuring The 1. Most activities are free, except Salamanders, will start at 8 p.m., with fireworks LOUISE R. SHAW, C3 for breakfasts, and are open to scheduled for 9:45. On July 4, breakfast will be from 7-9 p.m. everyone. at Founder’s Park, $3 for kids nine and North Salt Lake younger, $5 for those 10 and up, and $20 for an On July 2, fun starts at 6 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Vernal Resource Management Plan—Draft Environmental Impact Statement
    Vernal Resource Management Plan—Draft Environmental Impact Statement 3.2 AIR QUALITY Air quality within the VPA and its surrounding airshed has the potential to be affected by such activities as emissions from the construction and operation of oil and gas facilities, access roads, and other elements of management activities. This section describes the existing air quality resource of the VPA and the applicable air regulations that would apply to the alternatives. 3.2.1 Regional Overview The climate in the VPA is characterized as arid, with cold winters and hot summers. Annual precipitation (rainfall and snowfall) in the VPA ranges from 8 to 35 inches and is dependent largely on elevation and aspect. Temperature inversions, where air temperatures near the ground are colder than the temperatures above, are common in the basins and other lower elevational areas of the VPA. Inversions commonly occur in winter when snow accumulation on the ground combines with short daylight hours. In summer, inversions dissipate rapidly when early morning sunlight warms the air near the ground surface. Inversions can hinder air pollutant dispersion by preventing emissions from mixing with the ambient air in the vertical direction. On average, mean morning mixing heights in the area are approximately 1,000 feet; mean afternoon mixing heights are more than 7,800 feet (Holzworth 1972). Mean morning mixing heights tend to be lowest in summer and fall, and highest in winter. Air pollutant dispersion in the VPA is also dependent on wind direction and speed. Although wind direction is highly influenced by the local terrain, the wind direction in the VPA tends to be southeasterly, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Outdoor Air Quality and Health
    Care Process Model SEPTEMBER 2015 Outdoor Air Quality and Health September 2015 The Air Quality and Health Team, under the guidance of Intermountain LiVe Well and the Office of the Sustainability, developed this care process model (CPM) to provide evidence-based guidelines on the health effects of air quality. It is primarily intended to help providers counsel patients about outdoor physical activity when air quality is poor. This CPM is based on guidelines from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, current research on air quality and health, and advice from Intermountain experts. WHAT’S INSIDE Why Focus on OUTDOOR AIR QUALITY? POLLUTANTS ...................2 • Everyone is affected. Air quality affects the entire population we care HEALTH EFFECTS OF POOR AIR QUALITY ..............3 for. All providers need to know how to counsel patients on how to respond. Because exposure to polluted air cannot be measured in the individual COUNSELING PATIENTS ...........4 Pregnant women . 4 patient, it is usually not apparent as a contributor to acute and chronic health Very young children . 4 conditions. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates, however, that Children with asthma . 4 WHO 2 million premature deaths may be attributable to air pollution each year. People exercising or working outdoors . 4 • A high proportion of Utah’s population is at risk. People at increased Adults with asthma . 5 risk for adverse health outcomes from exposure to poor air include children, Adults with lung disease . 5 the elderly, and people with existing asthma, lung disease, cardiovascular Adults with cardiovascular conditions . 5 disease, and stroke. One-third of Utah’s population is either 18 and under Adults with neurological conditions .
    [Show full text]