<<

Jussi Åkerberg, M. Sc. (Eng.) Project Manager Vaisala Helsinki Finland

Introducing the Vaisala Software State-of-the-Art

Telemetry In connection with the launch of the next generation of sounding systems Vaisala will launch a new state-of-the-art ground equip- ment , the Vaisala Software Radio. Used together with the new digital Vaisala Radiosonde RS92-AGP this technology he fully digital telemetry is the answer to the increasing demand for telemetry link perfor- link using the Software mance and bandwidth efficiency. The new radio receiver technolo- T Radio between the gy introduces a fully digital telemetry link that enhances the use of Vaisala Radiosonde RS92-AGP and ground equipment in many ways. and the ground equipment Vaisala DigiCORA® Sounding System enables the use of mod- ern digital methods, error correction algorithms and telemetry diagnostics. The tech- nology used in the Software Ra- dio is similar to that used in cel- lular phones and their base sta- tions. The telemetry link perfor- mance of the new sounding sys- tem is based on the properties of GMSK (Gaussian Minimum Shift Keying) modulation, Reed- Solomon error correcting cod- ing and the Software Radio re- ceiver. The new system allows re- liable low-power narrowband ra- diosonde transmission and in- creases the temporal data resolu- tion to two levels per second. Software Radio The Vaisala Software Radio is a modular, multifunctional and reconfigurable software receiver, which offers excellent dynamic range and network connection. It will replace the current Vaisala radiosonde receiver ing system of all existing and tenna amplifier which resides in meteorological frequency band URR20/UPP201 in the most re- forthcoming Vaisala transmitter the , a Radiofrequency is first converted into an inter- cent generation of Vaisala types of the current generations receiver unit operating at 400 mediate frequency (IF) band of sounding ground equipment, of Vaisala radiosonde, such as MHz and a receiver processor 16 – 22 MHz. The IF signal is the Vaisala DigiCORA® Sound- RS80, RS90, RS92 and later. unit (see figure 1). then sampled with a high-perfor- ing System. The Software Radio The Software Radio hard- In the 400 MHz RF unit, the mance 14-bit analog-to-digital is intended to act as the receiv- ware consists of a low-noise an- whole of the 400 – 406 MHz converter, whereby a sam- ➤

164/2004 11 pling rate of 64 Msamples/sec- ond is used. The digital signal is filtered and down converted to the baseband with a digital down converter (DDC) in the Receiver Processor unit, as shown in fig. 2. Using multiple digital down converters enables multichannel reception. Further processing of the sig- nal, comprising demodulation, error detection and correction and telemetry analysis, is done in a powerful 32-bit floating point digital signal processor (DSP). The signal processor sends the data to a front processor server process that handles the Figure 1. The software radio hardware: a low-noise antenna amplifier, a 400 MHz RF receiver unit and a receiver data delivery to the sounding processor unit. software client processes, accord- ing to the data subscriptions. The server process communi- cates with the GPS unit of the sounding processing subsystem quency (IF) to radio frequency data frame is protected with transmitter and in the Software and also delivers the local GPS (RF). Reed-Solomon checkbytes, Radio receiver. data for windfinding. The digital receiver, similar- which are used in error correc- The main emphasis in the ly, employs a wideband analog- tion. A maximum of 12 corrupt- GMSK modulation design of the radio receiver was to-digital converter (ADC) that ed 8-bit-long bytes can be cor- The transmitter modulates the on improving spurious free dyn- captures the whole of the inter- rected within one 255-byte-long carrier wave by GMSK-modula- amic range and sensitivity over esting frequency band. The re- data frame. The data is also tion (Gaussian Minimum Shift its predecessors. Some specifica- ceiver then extracts, downcon- scrambled to get a uniform dis- Keying). GMSK modulation of- tions of the 400 MHz RF unit verts and demodulates the chan- tribution of ones and zeros and fers a compromise between high are shown in table 1. nel waveform using software to avoid long sequences of the spectrum efficiency and an ac- same value. ceptable level of demodulation Frequency Range 400 – 406 MHz At the receiver end, the de- complexity. It enables a narrow Noise Figure 8 dB modulated baseband data is de- spectral width and thus enables Intermediate Frequency 16 – 22 MHz scrambled and the Reed- several channels to be used in Image Rejection 45 dB Solomon error-correcting algo- the allowed frequency band. Spurious Free Dynamic Range 80 dB rithm is applied. The data is then GMSK-modulation also makes Third Order Intercept Point (IIP3) +16 dBm validated using the checksums. it possible to achieve a low level Maximum Input Power Level -9 dBm full scale Figure 4 shows the different sig- of adjacent channel interference. nal processing phases in the A GMSK-modulated signal has Table 1. Main specifications of the RF unit

Telemetry link loaded on a general-purpose dig- Figure 2. Signal processing sequence of the Software Radio. ital signal processor.1 Digital telemetry Figure 3 illustrates the general Implementation of the principle of the digital telemetry telemetry link. Digital systems use digital The RS92-AGP transmits a GM- modulation that modulates the SK (Gaussian Minimum Shift carrier directly. Keying) modulated signal which In a digital transmitter the carries 2400-bit data frames at a waveforms are generated as sam- data rate of 4800 bps. The ra- pled digital signals, converted diosonde frame is divided into from digital to analog via a wide- several sub-blocks. Each sub- band digital-to-analog converter block is followed by a CRC-16 (DAC) and then possibly upcon- checksum to make sure that the verted from intermediate fre- data is valid. In addition, each

12 164/2004 SNo Range [km] Height [km] FER with FER no EEC [%] EEC [%] Y3627235 78 26 0.120 6.740 Y3627738 52 18 0.140 7.690 Y3627219 51 20 0.034 6.660 Y3627201 53 26 1.930 10.850 Y3627212 54 21 0.014 6.700 Y3627203 54 24 0.012 2.390 Y3627210 50 27 0.048 5.110 Y3627211 47 24 0.013 5.220 Y3627204 48 25 0.012 4.990 Y3627198 71 27 0.150 7.160 Y3627196 70 30 0.390 6.890 Y3627205 72 30 0.390 6.500 Figure 3. Digital telemetry link. Y3627206 80 28 0.010 5.560 Y0617110 161 28 3.680 9.840 Y0647077 146 30 1.940 6.620 Y0647086 173 26 0.190 4.320 Y0617071 100 28 0.510 7.270 Y0647084 100 29 0.360 6.990 Y0647078 76 34 0.017 7.490 Y0647098 50 13 0.036 3.800 Y0617005 108 34 0.016 0.240 Y0537028 161 27 0.097 2.460 Table 2. Results of the test soundings. a constant envelope, enabling The code used in the ra- the signal to be amplified with diosonde is RS(255,231), m = 8. simple nonlinear amplifiers. Therefore 12 erroneous symbols This reduces the power con- per block of 255 symbols can be sumption, an important advan- recovered. This means that 4.7% tage in battery-powered devices.2 of the symbols can be erro- neous. Reed-Solomon Reed-Solomon coding en- The Reed-Solomon error correc- ables transmission error correc- Figure 4. Digital signal processing in the transmitter and in the receiver. tion coding is a widely used er- tion at the receiver and so the ror correcting method in wire- needed signal-to-noise ratio may less communications. It is suit- be reduced without losing any able for applications in which information. It is also possible to Sounding tests data is naturally structured as calculate the coding gain for a Test results blocks. The Reed-Solomon en- given code. With the Reed- The performance of the teleme- coder adds redundant bits to a Solomon code described above, try with different types of anten- Antenna performance block of digital data and the en- the coding gain is approximately nas and the effect of the Reed- The transmitted signal is affected coder attempts to recover the 4 dB. In other words, with Reed- Solomon algorithm are dis- in several ways during the trans- original data distorted by the Solomon coding the transmitter cussed next. The results have mission. It is bent, scattered and transmission channel. However, signal power can be greatly re- been collected from three test reflected in the atmosphere. At the redundancy level is not high duced in comparison to a similar sounding sets using the Vaisala 400 MHz and within the dis- and for this reason Reed- system that does not use Reed- Radiosonde RS92-AGP and the tances coming up in the ra- Solomon is suitable for applica- Solomon coding.3 Software Radio receiver. The diosonde soundings, these phe- tions in which channel capacity soundings were conducted at the nomena are not very significant. is relatively low. CRC-16 Checksum premises of the Jokioinen Obser- The most important propaga- By nature, Reed-Solomon The Reed-Solomon decoder vatory of the Finnish Meteorol- tion mechanisms of the ra- coding is especially effective in does not reliably detect more er- ogical Institute in 2003. diosonde signal are line-of-sight correcting burst errors; that is, rors than it can itself correct. In propagation and multipath data is not handled by bits but addition to the Reed-Solomon Test setup propagation. The latter is prob- by m-bit long symbols. An (n, k) coding, a special checksum must The measurement setup at lematic, because it can cause fad- Reed-Solomon code has n = be used to reliably detect frames, Jokioinen is presented in figure ing that degrades the perfor- 2^m - 1 code symbols and k which have more errors than can 5. There were two different set- mance of the telemetry link. message symbols. The number be corrected by the Reed- ups, one using a directional an- Buildings, hills, forests and other of parity check symbols is n - k = Solomon decoder. Sub-blocks tenna and the other using an obstacles can cause diffraction 2 · t. Such a code is capable of with a valid checksum can be omnidirectional antenna. The and fading through multipath correcting t erroneous symbols used even if the rest of the frame GPS antenna signal was shared propagation. This makes the per- in the code. is corrupted. for the two systems. formance of the telemetry ➤

164/2004 13 Figure 5. Test setup.

stands for frame error ratio with error correction and “FER no EEC” is frame error ratio with no error correction. As shown in table 2, the Reed-Solomon algorithm has a dramatic effect on FER. The se- lected Reed-Solomon code RS(255,231) seems to be capable of correcting most errors within the sounding range in most cas- es. In practice this also means that the burst errors are less than 12 bytes long. Summary The fully digital telemetry link between the RS92-AGP ra- diosonde and the ground equip- ment using the Software Radio enables the use of modern digital modulation methods, error cor- rection algorithms and telemetry diagnostics. In the test series the achieved average frame error ra- link also dependent on the tio was below 0.5%. G sounding environment, the an- tenna type that is used and the References location of the antenna4. F. Carden 1995: Telemetry Systems De- sign, Artech House To compare telemetry link performance with the direction- A. Houghton 1997: The Engineer’s Error al and omnidirectional anten- Coding Handbook, Chapman & nas, single RS92-AGP radioson- Hall des were received. Both setups are presented in figure 5. A. Linz, A. Hendrickson 1996: Efficient Signal to noise ratios (SNR) implementation of an I-Q GMSK and occurred frame errors for Modulator, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, Vol. 43, No.1, both antennas in an exceptional- Figure 6. Test sounding with two antennas. pp. 14-23, Jan 1996 ly long sounding are shown in figure 6. With the omnidirec- Mitola 1996: What is a software radio?, tional antenna the error count www.ourworld.compuserve.com/hom starts to increase after 160 km tive to multipath fading which is algorithm was studied with the epages/jmitola, Copyright Mitola’s and the signal is too weak for re- the most important reason for omnidirectional antenna using Statisfaction, all rights reserved, used ception at about 270 km. The di- signal level variations. It is also three-position antenna switch by permission for educational purposes rectional antenna performed probable that the narrower radi- with two empty positions. The well up to 320 km. ation pattern of the omnidirec- radiosonde search algorithm se- Pousi 2003: Digital Meteorological Ra- As can be expected, there are tional antenna is more sensitive lecting the antenna switch posi- diosonde Telemetry, Master’s thesis rather large variations in the to the movements of the ra- tion caused additional errors SNR with both antennas. It can diosonde during the ascent5. that were all corrected by the 1 Mitola (1996) also be seen that there are more Reed-Solomon algorithm. 2 A. Linz, A. Hendrickson (1996) rapid changes with the omnidi- Effect of Reed-Solomon The results of the test sound- 3 F. Carden (1995), A. Houghton (1997) rectional antenna. The omnidi- algorithm ings can be seen in table 2. In 4 Pousi (2003) rectional antenna is more sensi- The effect of the Reed-Solomon the table, “FER with EEC” 5 Pousi (2003)

14 164/2004