Strix Uralensis (Ural Owl)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Strix uralensis (Ural Owl) European Red List of Birds Supplementary Material The European Union (EU27) Red List assessments were based principally on the official data reported by EU Member States to the European Commission under Article 12 of the Birds Directive in 2013-14. For the European Red List assessments, similar data were sourced from BirdLife Partners and other collaborating experts in other European countries and territories. For more information, see BirdLife International (2015). Contents Reported national population sizes and trends p. 2 Trend maps of reported national population data p. 3 Sources of reported national population data p. 5 Species factsheet bibliography p. 8 Recommended citation BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Further information http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/info/euroredlist http://www.birdlife.org/europe-and-central-asia/european-red-list-birds-0 http://www.iucnredlist.org/initiatives/europe http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/conservation/species/redlist/ Data requests and feedback To request access to these data in electronic format, provide new information, correct any errors or provide feedback, please email [email protected]. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Strix uralensis (Ural Owl) Table 1. Reported national breeding population size and trends in Europe1. Country (or Population estimate Short-term population trend4 Long-term population trend4 Subspecific population (where relevant) 2 territory) Size (pairs)3 Europe (%) Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Austria 5-10 <1 2008-2012 medium ? ? Belarus 1,200-1,800 2 2000-2012 medium 0 0 2000-2012 medium 0 0 1980-2012 medium Bosnia & HG 200-400 <1 2010-2014 poor ? ? Bulgaria 45-70 <1 2005-2012 medium 0 0-5 2000-2012 medium 0 0-5 1980-2012 poor Croatia 700-1,000 1 2013 medium ? ? Czech Rep. 35-50 <1 2005-2007 good + 170-280 2000-2012 medium + 440-1800 1980-2012 medium Estonia 1,000-1,500 1 2008-2012 medium - 20-50 2001-2012 medium 0 0-10 1980-2012 medium Finland 3,300-3,500 4 1998-2012 good + 18-25 1998-2012 good + 15-17 1982-2012 good Germany 5-6 <1 2005-2009 good F 0 1998-2008 good + 202-403 1985-2008 good Hungary 160-260 <1 2008-2012 poor F 0 2000-2012 poor + 1300-1500 1980-2012 poor Italy 5-8 <1 2006-2008 medium ? + 1994-2008 poor Kosovo 3-10 <1 2009-2014 medium ? ? Latvia 1,000-2,000 2 2012 medium - 29 2007-2012 medium + 0-300 1994-2012 medium Lithuania 40-80 <1 2008-2012 medium + 10-20 2001-2012 medium FYRO Macedonia 1-50 <1 2001-2012 poor ? ? Norway 10-20 <1 2013 good F ≥100 2001-2013 good F 0 1980-2013 good Poland 1,300-1,800 2 2008-2012 medium + 270-300 2000-2012 medium + 70-140 1980-2012 medium Romania 6,000-12,000 10 2001-2013 poor ? ? Russia 30,000-110,000 69 2000-2008 poor + 5-30 2000-2012 poor + 5-30 1980-2012 medium Serbia 450-650 1 2008-2012 medium + 1-9 2000-2012 medium + 1-9 1980-2012 medium Slovakia 1,400-2,500 2 2009 poor + 5-10 2000-2012 poor + 10-30 1980-2012 poor Slovenia 700-1,200 1 2002-2012 medium + 5-20 1998-2012 medium + 10-20 1980-2012 medium Sweden 2,000-3,400 3 2008-2012 medium 0 0 2001-2012 poor + 10-40 1980-2012 medium Ukraine 400-900 1 2000 medium + 5-10 2001-2012 medium + 15-25 1980-2012 medium EU27 17,000-28,400 26 Uncertain Europe 50,000-143,000 100 Increasing 1 See 'Sources' at end of factsheet, and for more details on individual EU Member State reports, see the Article 12 reporting portal at http://bd.eionet.europa.eu/article12/report. 2 The designation of geographical entities and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or BirdLife International concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. 3 In the few cases where population size estimates were reported in units other than those specified, they were converted to the correct units using standard correction factors. 4 The robustness of regional trends to the effects of any missing or incomplete data was tested using plausible scenarios, based on other sources of information, including any other reported information, recent national Red Lists, scientific literature, other publications and consultation with relevant experts. 5 Trend directions are reported as: increasing (+); decreasing (-); stable (0); fluctuating (F); or unknown (?). 6 Trend magnitudes are rounded to the nearest integer. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Trend maps A symbol appears in each country where the species occurs: the shape and colour of the symbol represent the population trend in that country, and the size of the symbol corresponds to the proportion of the European population occurring in that country. KEY Ç Large increase (≥50%) È Large decrease (≥50%) Ç Moderate increase (20–49%) È Moderate decrease (20–49%) Ç Small increase (<20%) È Small decrease (<20%) ñ Increase of unknown magnitude ò Decrease of unknown magnitude å Stable or fluctuating 0 Unknown ¢ Present (no population or trend data) Ð Extinct since 1980 Each symbol, with the exception of Present and Extinct, may occur in up to three different size classes, corresponding to the proportion of the European population occurring in that country. ñ Large: ≥10% of the European population ñ Medium: 1–9% of the European population ñ Small: <1% of the European population The designation of geographical entities and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or BirdLife International concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Figure 1. Breeding population sizes and short-term trends across Europe. Figure 2. Breeding population sizes and long-term trends across Europe. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Strix uralensis (Ural Owl) Sources Austria Breeding population size: R. Probst & G. Malle (unpubl. Daten) Breeding short-term trend: BirdLife Austria, estimate on the basis of available unpublished and published trend data Belarus Breeding population size: Zhuravliev D.V. - personal communication Breeding short-term trend: BirdLife International (2004) Birds in Europe: population estimates, trends and conservation status. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International. (BirdLife Conservation Series, No 12). Breeding long-term trend: Nikiforov M.E., Kozulin A.V., eds. Belarussian birds at the beginning of XXI century: status, numbers, distribution. - 1997. - Minsk. - 187 p. Bosnia and Herzegovina Breeding population size: Kotrošan, D., Drocić, N., Trbojević, S., Šimić, E., Dervović, I., 2012: Program IBA, Međunarosdno značajna područja za ptice, u Bosni i Hercegovini. Ornitološko društvo “Naše ptice”, interno izdanje za projekat “Evaluacija IBA područja u FBiH”, Sarajevo., Kotrošan, D. & Hatibović, E., 2012: Raptors in Bosnia and Herzegovina – status and perspectives for monitoring. Acrocephalus 33 (154/155): 173-179. Bulgaria Breeding population size: Iankov, P. (ed.) 2007 Atlas of Breeding Birds in Bulgaria. Bulgarian Society for the Protection of Birds, Conservation Series, Book 10, Sofia, BSPB, 679 p. (In Bulgarian and English) Golemansky V.(ed.) (2011) Red data Book of Bulgaria.vol.2 Animals. BAS, MOEW, Sofia. BSPB database Breeding short-term trend: Iankov, P. (ed.) 2007 Atlas of Breeding Birds in Bulgaria. Bulgarian Society for the Protection of Birds, Conservation Series, Book 10, Sofia, BSPB, 679 p. (In Bulgarian and English) Golemansky V.(ed.) (2011) Red data Book of Bulgaria.vol.2 Animals. BAS, MOEW, Sofia. BSPB database Breeding long-term trend: Iankov, P. (ed.) 2007 Atlas of Breeding Birds in Bulgaria. Bulgarian Society for the Protection of Birds, Conservation Series, Book 10, Sofia, BSPB, 679 p. (In Bulgarian and English) Golemansky V.(ed.) (2011) Red data Book of Bulgaria.vol.2 Animals. BAS, MOEW, Sofia. Botev, B. (ed.) 1985. Red Data Book of Bulgaria, Vol. 2, Animals, Sofia, BAS, 183 p. BSPB database Croatia Breeding population size: Zavod za ornitologiju (Sanja Barišić, Davor Ćiković, Jelena Kralj, Goran Sušić,Vesna Tutiš), Dragan Radović, Ivan Budinski, Robert Crnković, Antun Delić, Dubravko Dender, Vlatka Dumbović, Ivan Darko Grlica, Bariša Ilić, Luka Jurinović, Davor Krnjeta, Krešimir Leskovar, Duje Lisičić, Ivica Lolić, Gordan Lukač. Kristijan Mandić, Krešimir Mikulić, Tibor Mikuska, Gvido Piasevoli, Andrej Radalj, Zlatko Ružanović, Vlatka Šćetarić, Mirko Šetina, Adrian Tomik (2013): Procjene brojnosti za SPA područja. Državni zavod za zaštitu prirode, Zagreb Breeding short-term trend: BiE III Work group, Croatia Breeding long-term trend: BiE III Work group, Croatia Czech Republic Breeding population size: HORA J., BRINKE B., VOJTECHOVSKA E., HANZAL V. & KUCERA Z. (eds.) 2010: Monitoring druhu prilohy I směrnice o ptacich a ptacich oblasti v letech 2005-2007. AOPK Praha Breeding short-term trend: STASTNY K., BEJCEK V. & HUDEC K. 2006: Atlas hnizdniho rozsireni ptaku v Ceske republice. Aventinum Praha. HORA J., KLOUBEC B., KRENEK D., KUCERA Z. & LORENC T. inpress: Monitoring druhu prilohy I směrnice o ptacich a ptacich oblasti v letech 2008-2010. AOPK CR Breeding long-term trend: HORA J., KLOUBEC B., KRENEK D., KUCERA Z. & LORENC T. inpress: Monitoring druhu prilohy I směrnice o ptacich a ptacich oblasti v letech 2008-2010. AOPK CR Estonia Breeding population size: Elts, J., Leito, A., Leivits, A., Luigujõe, L., Mägi, E., Nellis, Rein, Nellis, Renno, Ots, M., Pehlak, H.