Site Fidelity in the Canary Islands Stonechat Saxicola Dacotiae In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Site Fidelity in the Canary Islands Stonechat Saxicola Dacotiae In acta oecologica 34 (2008) 1–8 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/actoec Original article Site fidelity in the Canary Islands stonechat Saxicola dacotiae in relation to spatial and temporal patterns of habitat suitability Juan Carlos Illeraa,*, Mario Dı´azb aIsland Ecology and Evolutionary Research Group, IPNA, CSIC, 38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain bInstituto de Recursos Naturales, Centro de Ciencias Medioambientales, CSIC, C/ Serrano 115 bis, E-28006 Madrid, Spain article info abstract Article history: We investigate the degree of territory faithfulness of the Canary Islands stonechat Saxicola Published online 13 February 2008 dacotiae, an endemic bird species of the semi-arid island of Fuerteventura (Canary Islands, Spain), and the spatial and temporal variability of habitat traits related to its breeding suc- Keywords: cess over its whole distribution range. Between 1998 and 2003 we monitored the spatial lo- Arid ecology cation of individually marked birds to determine whether they were site faithful. We also Canary Islands stonechat analysed the spatial and temporal variability of the abiotic (rainfall) and biotic (food avail- Fuerteventura ability, abundance of avian predators and competitors, and nest predation) factors that Habitat quality may influence breeding success in this species. Canary Islands stonechats were strongly Site faithfulness site faithful. Out of 106 individuals, 86 (81.0%) were re-sighted during the whole study pe- Saxicola dacotiae riod, and most re-sightings (76; 88.4%) were in the territory where they were initially Semiarid habitat caught. Dispersal events were rare both within (1%) and between (6%) consecutive years, Spatial homogeneity and detectability of colour-ringed birds was as high as 87%. No significant spatial variation of abiotic and biotic factors affecting success was found at a range of spatial scales. Low spatial variance in the habitat characteristics determining reproductive success could have favoured site fidelity in this species, as costs associated with changing site would not be compensated for by significant increases in survival or breeding prospects in new territories. Strict protection of the areas already occupied by this ‘‘Endangered’’ narrow range endemic bird would be the most effective way of preserving it, due to its strict hab- itat and microhabitat requirements and its strong site fidelity. ª 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction ecological factors such as morphological design, abundance and quality of food, availability of breeding sites or presence Mobile individuals must decide where to live. The frequency of competitors, predators and parasites (Cody, 1985; Stephens with which this decision has to be made can vary from once and Krebs, 1986; Wiens, 1989; Newton, 1998). only to repeatedly over the lifetime of an individual. The deci- Birds are highly mobile organisms. Nevertheless, individ- sion of where to live will be constrained by evolutionary or uals that show site fidelity by returning to their breeding or * Corresponding author. Tel.: þ34 922 260190x277; fax: þ34 922 260135. E-mail address: [email protected] (J.C. Illera). 1146-609X/$ – see front matter ª 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.actao.2008.01.003 2 acta oecologica 34 (2008) 1–8 wintering territories year after year have been recorded in many species of migratory birds (e.g. Cuadrado et al., 1995; 2. Material and methods Latta and Faaborg, 2001; Pyle et al., 2001; Hoover, 2003). Site fi- delity is predicted to be maintained by various benefits includ- 2.1. Species and study area ing pairing with a familiar partner (Schieck and Hannon, 1989), or because familiarity with an area can improve the The Canary Islands stonechat is a small passerine endemic to ability of individuals to escape predators, to forage success- the Fuerteventura Island. It breeds across the entire island fully, or to identify better nesting sites (Greenwood and where suitable habitat occurs, favouring ravines and slopes Harvey, 1982; Shields, 1984; Stamps, 1995; Schjørring et al., covered by boulders and shrubs and avoiding sandy areas 2000). Furthermore, site faithful individuals may benefit and recent lava flows. Habitat and microhabitat selection de- from the presence of familiar neighbours, as the costs of terri- pend on food (arthropod) availability and presence of perches torial defence (time spent singing or fighting) has been shown and suitable nest sites (Illera, 2001). Canary Island stonechats to increase when neighbours change (Falls and McNicholl, are strictly sedentary. Individuals pair up and establish terri- 1979; Ydenberg et al., 1988; Eason and Hannon, 1994). tories and then defend them against conspecific intruders In spite of these advantages, if fitness benefits obtained on year round (Illera, 2004a). Territory shapes are irregular, and the current breeding site are low (i.e., low reproductive suc- sizes can vary among breeding seasons but rarely exceed an cess), then individuals are predicted to change breeding site area of 250 m in radius (around 20 ha; Illera, 2004a). The breed- in favour of sites where fitness prospects may be better. ing period extends from December to April (Illera and Dı´az, Many studies have found that low breeding success decreases 2006). In wet years, pairs breed over more extended periods site fidelity and that individuals tend to return to sites where and lay two clutches, whereas in dry years they breed only they have bred successfully (Beletsky and Orians, 1991; once or not at all. The number of fledglings is mostly deter- Switzer, 1997a; Blums et al., 2002; Hoover, 2003). The most ac- mined by nest predation and breeding effort (which is posi- cepted behavioural rule for site fidelity is that individuals tively related to rainfall; Illera and Dı´az, 2006). should choose to stay in their territories if the previous breed- The Canary Islands are a volcanic archipelago located in ing attempt was successful (‘‘win-stay’’) or to switch to a new the north-eastern Atlantic Ocean, 100 km west of mainland nest site if their reproductive success was low (‘‘lose-switch’’; Africa. It comprises seven main islands and several islets Switzer, 1993; Schmidt, 2001, 2004). that emerged during different eruptive episodes from the Mio- Apart from previous experience, the decision to stay or cene to the present (Carracedo and Day, 2002). Fuerteventura leave a site will be influenced by the costs associated with is the island closest to the mainland, the oldest (c. 22 million moving to, and settling into, unfamiliar territories (Switzer, years old; Carracedo and Day, 2002), and the second largest 2 1993; Jakob et al., 2001; Yoder et al., 2004), and on whether (1659.71 km ; Fig. 1). Its topography is mostly low and flat the benefits of moving compensate for these costs. Neverthe- (c. 200 m a.s.l.), with a maximum elevation of only 807 m. less, the costs and benefits of this trade-off in relation to envi- The climate is semi-arid. Rainfall (143 mm/year on average) is ronmental heterogeneity have, so far, rarely been explicitly strongly seasonal, with most rain falling during the autumn/ addressed (Switzer, 1997b). Most empirical studies on the winter months. Monthly rainfall records were obtained from site fidelity of birds have been carried out on migratory species four weather stations located close to the field sites (Fig. 1). with wide distribution ranges (references above). High spatial Mean monthly temperatures varied between 19 C in January variability in the quality of unoccupied territories is taken for and 21 C in August (Marzol-Jae´n, 1984). The vegetation is granted for these species, and such variance can compensate dominated by sparse and xerophytic shrubland (Rodrı´guez for moving and settling costs. However, this may not be the et al., 2000). case for sedentary species with narrow ranges. Strong site fi- delity may be maintained in these species if spatial variability 2.2. Ringing and monitoring of Canary Islands in habitat characteristics associated to fitness is low, even in stonechats the face of high temporal variability in breeding success and territory quality (Switzer, 1993). We ringed and monitored birds from December 1998 until We monitored the spatial location of individually marked March 2002 in 17 localities randomly distributed over the Canary Islands stonechats, Saxicola dacotiae, a bird species northern, central and southern parts of the island (Fig. 1). Birds endemic to the semi-arid island of Fuerteventura (Canary were caught with clap-nets placed below foraging perches us- Islands, Spain), from 1998 to 2003. Apart from documenting ing Tenebrio molitor larvae as bait. Each individual was ringed whether birds were faithful to their territories, the goal of with a unique combination of an aluminium ring (Spanish this study was to analyse the spatial and temporal variabil- Environmental Ministry) and two colour rings. Ringed birds ity of the abiotic (rainfall) and biotic (food availability, abun- were released at the point of capture which was located to dance of avian predators and competitors, and nest the nearest meter using a Global Positioning System. predation) factors that determine the among-year variability We monitored birds each month using observations made in breeding success of this species (Illera and Dı´az, 2006). along 1-km line transects and random visits made throughout Low spatial variability in these factors over the distribution the island. Transects were performed either in the morning area of the species is predicted to be associated with site (from 08:00 until 12:00) or during the afternoon (from 16:00 un- faithfulness, whereas high spatial variability would pre- til 19:00), avoiding rainy, very windy and cloudy days. We clude it if breeding success or habitat quality varies in chose the transect approach because it is a suitable method time (Switzer, 1993). for detecting birds in open landscapes such as those of acta oecologica 34 (2008) 1–8 3 30 km LANZAROTE LA PALMA 29ºN TENERIFE LA GOMERA FUERTEVENTURA 28ºN N GRAN EL HIERRO CANARIA 18ºW 17ºW 16ºW 15ºW 14ºW Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Does a Rival's Song Elicit Territorial Defense in a Tropical Songbird, The
    ABC 2017, 4(2):146-153 Animal Behavior and Cognition https://doi.org/10.12966/abc.02.05.2017 ©Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0) Does a Rival’s Song Elicit Territorial Defense in a Tropical Songbird, the Pied Bush Chat (Saxicola caprata)? Navjeevan Dadwal1* and Dinesh Bhatt1 1Gurukula Kangri University, Haridwar, Uttarakhand, India *Corresponding author (Email:[email protected]) Citation – Dadwal, N., & Bhatt, D. (2017). Does a rival’s song elicit territorial defense in a tropical songbird, the Pied Bush Chat (Saxicola caprata)? Animal Behavior and Cognition, 4(2), 146–153. https://doi.org/10.12966/ abc.02.05.2017 Abstract -The purpose of bird song and the way in which it is delivered has been argued to be adapted mainly for territorial defense. We performed a field experiment with the combination of playbacks and a model to test how much song actually relates to increased territorial defense in the territorial tropical songbird, the Pied Bush Chat, during breeding season (Feb–May, 2015) at Haridwar, Himalayan Foothills, India. As expected, the results of the experiment indicated that song was the major cue used by territory holders to cope with rival intrusions. The song rate was particularly escalated during simulated territorial interactions when the model was presented with a playback song of conspecifics. Behaviors such as restlessness (perch change), the height of perch, and distance from the model appeared to be of relatively lesser importance. To our knowledge, no avian species from the Indian subcontinent has been studied to provide evidence that song can escalate aggressive response by a territory owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Saxicola Dacotiae
    Ardeol a 57(2), 2010, 387-405 NEW DATA ON THE POPULATION, DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT PREFERENCES OF THE CANARY ISLANDS STONECHAT SAXICOLA DACOTIAE NUEVOS DATOS SOBRE EL TAMAÑO POBLACIONAL, LA DISTRIBUCIÓN Y LAS PREFERENCIAS DE HÁBITAT DE LA TARABILLA CANARIA SAXICOLA DACOTIAE Javier SEOANE 1 *, Alexandra KOUR I1, Juan Carlos ILLER A2, 3, David PALOMIN O4, César L . A LONS O5 an d Luis M . C ARRASCA L6 SUMMARY .— New data on the population, distribution and habitat preferences of the Canary Islands stonechat Saxicola dacotiae . This paper updates estimates of population size, distribution and habitat preferences of the endemic Canary Islands stonechat Saxicola dacotiae on the basis of data gathered across their whole distribution range, the island of Fuerteventura. We surveyed 1,462 0.5-km line transects during the reproductive seasons in 2005 and 2006, distributed across the whole island. Results were used to estimate population size using two methods: stratified estimates of mean densities and sum of estimated abundances across strata, and sum of estimations of abundance in 1 km x 1 km UTM squares based on statistical models built by boosted regression trees (BRT). In both methods we accounted for the effects of bird detectability in transects. Overall, 490 mature individuals were recorded. The Canary Islands stonechat preferred high, steep terrain (particularly above 20% slope and 200 m a.s.l.) and selected negatively the lower and flatter areas comprising most of the island. These habitats were occupied, however, albeit at low density. The highest average densities sampled per habitat (up to 43 birds/km 2) were registered on steep areas (> 11%) with scrub, although the statistical models predicted densities of 66 birds/km 2 in the optimum 1 Grupo de Ecología Terrestre (TEG), Departamento de Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid .
    [Show full text]
  • The Canary Islands
    The Canary Islands Naturetrek Tour Report 6 - 13 March 2009 Indian Red Admiral – Vanessa indica vulcania Canary Islands Cranesbill – Geranium canariense Fuerteventura Sea Daisy – Nauplius sericeus Aeonium urbicum - Tenerife Euphorbia handiensis - Fuerteventura Report compiled by Tony Clarke with images by kind courtesy of Ken Bailey Naturetrek Cheriton Mill Cheriton Alresford Hampshire SO24 0NG England T: +44 (0)1962 733051 F: +44 (0)1962 736426 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report The Canary Islands Tour Leader: Tony Clarke (tour leader and naturalist) Tour Participants: Phil Haywood Hazel Haywood Peter Barrett Charles Wade Ken Bailey Day 1 Friday 6th March The arrival time of the group meant that we had enough time to do some birding in the afternoon and so we drove up from the airport, through Vilaflor to the Zona Recreativa de Las Lajas. This is probably the most well known location on Tenerife as it is where most people see their first Blue Chaffinches and we were not to be disappointed. Also at this location we saw the only Great Spotted Woodpecker of the tour plus a few Canaries, a Tenerife Kinglet and a few African Blue Tits. After departing from Las Lajas we continued climbing and entered the Las Cañadas National Park which is a spectacular drive through volcanic scenery. On the drive we encountered quite a few endemic plants including Pinus canariensis and Spartocytisus supranubius that were common and easily recognized and Echium wildpretii, Pterocephalus lasiospermus, Descurainia bourgaeana and Argyranthemum teneriffae which were rather unimpressive as they were not yet flowering but we were compensated by the fabulous views across the ancient caldera.
    [Show full text]
  • AERC Wplist July 2015
    AERC Western Palearctic list, July 2015 About the list: 1) The limits of the Western Palearctic region follow for convenience the limits defined in the “Birds of the Western Palearctic” (BWP) series (Oxford University Press). 2) The AERC WP list follows the systematics of Voous (1973; 1977a; 1977b) modified by the changes listed in the AERC TAC systematic recommendations published online on the AERC web site. For species not in Voous (a few introduced or accidental species) the default systematics is the IOC world bird list. 3) Only species either admitted into an "official" national list (for countries with a national avifaunistic commission or national rarities committee) or whose occurrence in the WP has been published in detail (description or photo and circumstances allowing review of the evidence, usually in a journal) have been admitted on the list. Category D species have not been admitted. 4) The information in the "remarks" column is by no mean exhaustive. It is aimed at providing some supporting information for the species whose status on the WP list is less well known than average. This is obviously a subjective criterion. Citation: Crochet P.-A., Joynt G. (2015). AERC list of Western Palearctic birds. July 2015 version. Available at http://www.aerc.eu/tac.html Families Voous sequence 2015 INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME remarks changes since last edition ORDER STRUTHIONIFORMES OSTRICHES Family Struthionidae Ostrich Struthio camelus ORDER ANSERIFORMES DUCKS, GEESE, SWANS Family Anatidae Fulvous Whistling Duck Dendrocygna bicolor cat. A/D in Morocco (flock of 11-12 suggesting natural vagrancy, hence accepted here) Lesser Whistling Duck Dendrocygna javanica cat.
    [Show full text]
  • MORPHOLOGICAL and ECOLOGICAL EVOLUTION in OLD and NEW WORLD FLYCATCHERS a Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the College O
    MORPHOLOGICAL AND ECOLOGICAL EVOLUTION IN OLD AND NEW WORLD FLYCATCHERS A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Clay E. Corbin August 2002 This dissertation entitled MORPHOLOGICAL AND ECOLOGICAL EVOLUTION IN OLD AND NEW WORLD FLYCATCHERS BY CLAY E. CORBIN has been approved for the Department of Biological Sciences and the College of Arts and Sciences by Donald B. Miles Associate Professor, Department of Biological Sciences Leslie A. Flemming Dean, College of Arts and Sciences CORBIN, C. E. Ph.D. August 2002. Biological Sciences. Morphological and Ecological Evolution in Old and New World Flycatchers (215pp.) Director of Dissertation: Donald B. Miles In both the Old and New Worlds, independent clades of sit-and-wait insectivorous birds have evolved. These independent radiations provide an excellent opportunity to test for convergent relationships between morphology and ecology at different ecological and phylogenetic levels. First, I test whether there is a significant adaptive relationship between ecology and morphology in North American and Southern African flycatcher communities. Second, using morphological traits and observations on foraging behavior, I test whether ecomorphological relationships are dependent upon locality. Third, using multivariate discrimination and cluster analysis on a morphological data set of five flycatcher clades, I address whether there is broad scale ecomorphological convergence among flycatcher clades and if morphology predicts a course measure of habitat preference. Finally, I test whether there is a common morphological axis of diversification and whether relative age of origin corresponds to the morphological variation exhibited by elaenia and tody-tyrant lineages.
    [Show full text]
  • • the Following Pages Have Some Identification Markers for Each of the Chats Found in India • to Know More on These Birds Y
    • The following pages have some identification markers for each of the Chats found in India • To know more on these birds you can visit http://ogaclicks.com/chat • If you are interested in coming on any of my tours or workshops please share your email id. I will keep you updated • Mail me at [email protected] • You can also call me on (91)9840119078 , (91) 9445219078 (91) 6369815812 List of Chats found in India Sno. Name Binomial Name Rubythroat (Calliopes ) 1 Siberian Rubythroat Calliope calliope 2 Himalayan Rubythroat Calliope pectoralis 3 Chinese Rubythroat Calliope tschebaiewi Bushchat (Saxicola) 1 Pied Bushchat Saxicola Caprata 2 Grey Bushchat Saxicola ferreus 3 Brown Rockchat Saxicola fusca 4 Hodgson's Bushchat Saxicola insignis 5 Jerdon's Bushchat Saxicola jerdoni 6 White-tailed Stonechat Saxicola leucurus 7 Stoliczka's Bushchat Saxicola macrorhynchus 8 Common Stonechat Saxicola torquatus ©www.ogaclicks.com Genus- Calliope • Rubythroat Chinese Rubythroat Identification Tips Chinese Rubythroat : Calliope tschebaiewi: Breeds in Ladhak, Winter visitor to North East India Black tail Grey head & Crown White supercilium Dark lores White submoustachial stripe Malar stripe Black Bill Upperparts grey Deep red from chin to lower throat Small white supercilium Black breast Outer rectrices with white tips Black Malar stripe White throat Grey flanks Legs are black Dark brown upperparts Grey underparts Male Whitish underparts scattered grey spots Difference from Breeding plumage Female Difference from male Reference : Birds of Indian Subcontinent
    [Show full text]
  • Sighting of a Siberian Stonechat (Saxicola Maurus, Pallas, 1773) a Rare Migratory Bird in Sirajgonj and Rajshahi Districts of Bangladesh A.M
    Univ. j. zool. Rajshahi. Univ. Vol. 34, 2015, pp. 39-41 ISSN 1023-61041 http://journals.sfu.ca/bd/index.php/UJZRU © Rajshahi University Zoological Society Scientific Note Sighting of a siberian stonechat (Saxicola maurus, Pallas, 1773) a rare migratory bird in Sirajgonj and Rajshahi districts of Bangladesh A.M. Saleh Reza, M. Nazrul Islam and Selina Parween* Department of Zoology, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi 6205, Bangladesh Key words: Stonechats, Siberian Stonechat, Muscicapidae The Stonechats are small sized passerine birds, during the months from last of October to June. In members of the family Muscicapidae. They are the month of January, 2016 this bird was seen mostly winter migrant of Bangladesh, feeding on and photographed four times. Four visits were flying and other insects. There are 15 species of made in January 2016 in search of this bird stonechats in the world (Gill & Donsker, 2017; covering an area of approximately 6.5 km east- Sethi et al., 2014), and only six species have been west (from Fultali Ghat, Kazla up to Police line ‘T- reported from Bangladesh (Siddiqui et al., 2008; bandh’) and around half km north-south in the Khan, 2008; IUCN Bangladesh 2015). The charland. stonechats are called as ‘Jhar Fidda’ or simply Identification of the bird: The detailed ‘Fidda’ in Bangla. Among the reported six species morphology and plumage colour of the from Bangladesh, the species Siberian Stonechat photographed bird were studied and matched with have not been included in the list of birds of the photographs provided in the literature Bangladesh by Siddiqui et al. (2008) or even in (Stoddart, 1992; Brazil 2009) and those are found the list of Indian birds by Ali (2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status of Birds in Spain
    CONSERVATION STATUS OF BIRDS IN SPAIN SEO/BirdLife 2010 In collaboration with SUPPORT & CREDITS SUPPORT Quique Marcelo SEO/BirdLife. C/ Melquiades Biencinto 34. 28053 Madrid. © Tel.: + 34 91 434 09 10 [email protected] · www.seo.org Remiz pendulinus Remiz pendulinus Recommended citation for publication SEO/BirdLife 2010. Conservation status of bird in Spain in 2010. SEO/BirdLife. Madrid. Credits Authors of texts, figures and tables: Alejandro Sánchez, Ana Bermejo, Ana Carricondo, Ana Íñigo, Blas Molina, David Howell, David Palomino, Juan Bécares, Juan Carlos Atienza, Juan Carlos del Moral, Octavio Infante, Pep Arcos, Roberto González and Virginia Escandell. Editing: David Howell, Agustín Carretero, Ana Bermejo, Blas Molina, Josefina Maestre, Juan Carlos del Moral and Virginia Escandell. Translation: OpenDOORtranslations Data collection: Mariano Velázquez, Emilio Escudero and Blas Molina. Database: Pedro Silos. Cover photograph: Jesús Mateos Interior photographs: Alejandro Vicente, Antonio Pestana, Aurelio Martín, Beltrán Ceballos, Beneharo Rodríguez, Blas Molina, Carlos Sanz, Félix Fernández, Foto-Ardeidas, Francis Martín, Guillermo Doval, Jaime G. Puente, Javier Milla, Jordi Prieto, José Val Molina, Juan Bécares, Juan Carlos Atienza, Juan Carlos del Moral, Julio González, Luis Barrón, Manuel Lobón, Marcelo Cabrera, Nicolás Gallego, Pep Arcos, Quique Marcelo, Raúl Fernández, Tatavasco, Vicente María y Virginia Escandell. Illustrations: Juan Varela Simó Layout: Simétrica S.L. Printing: Netaigraf, S.L.L. Printed in Spain. © SEO/BirdLife 2010 The text may be used free of charge for the purposes of conservation work and campaigns, education and research, provided that the source is acknowledged in full. The copyright holder requests that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Buteo Rufinus Adlerbussard Hawks, Eagles, Vultures Buzzard Long-Legged Buzzard Sylvia Leucomelaena Akaziengrasmücke Perching Birds Cont
    wissenschaftlicher Name Deutscher Name species description Unterkategorie other (specify) Buteo rufinus Adlerbussard hawks, eagles, vultures buzzard long-legged buzzard Sylvia leucomelaena Akaziengrasmücke perching birds cont. old world warblers Arabian Warbler Onychoprion aleuticus Aleutenseeschwalbe shore birds terns Aleutian Tern Prunella collaris Alpenbraunelle perching birds cont. accentors Alpine Accentor Pyrrhocorax graculus Alpendohle crows alpine chough Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax Alpenkrähe crows red-billed cough Lagopus muta Alpenschneehuhn chicken like birds ptarmigans rock ptarmigan Tachymarptis melba Alpensegler swift, tree-swift, hummingbird swifts alpine swift Calidris alpina Alpenstrandläufer shore birds dunlin Turdus merula Amsel perching birds cont. common blackbird Falco amurensis Amurfalke hawks, eagles, vultures Falcons Amur Falcon Larus armenicus Armenienmöwe shore birds gulls Armenian Gull Sylvia deserticola Atlasgrasmücke perching birds cont. old world warblers Tristram's Warbler Tetrao urogallus Auerhuhn pheasants Western Capercaillie Haematopus ostralegus Austernfischer shore birds oystercatcher Leucophaeus atricilla Aztekenmöwe shore birds Laughing Gull Motacilla alba Bachstelze perching birds cont. white wagtail Calidris bairdii Bairdstrandläufer shore birds Baird's Sandpiper Gypaetus barbatus Bartgeier hawks, eagles, vultures Lammergeier Strix nebulosa Bartkauz owls typical owls Great Grey Owl Panurus biarmicus Bartmeise perching birds titmice Bearded Reedling Morus bassanus Baßtölpel pelicans, northern gannet
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of European Stonechat Saxicola Rubicola in the Islamic Republic of Iran
    Sandgrouse-080723:Sandgrouse 7/23/2008 12:49 PM Page 114 The status of European Stonechat Saxicola rubicola in the Islamic Republic of Iran GUY M KIRWAN & JOHN M BATES Despite much interest amongst taxonomists and amateur birdwatchers in the systematics and field identification of the Common Stonechat Saxicola torquatus complex of taxa in recent years, the most recent checklist of Iranian birds (Scott & Adhami 2006) merely records as a footnote that representatives of two forms have been recorded in the country. Following some recent treatments of the complex (eg Wink et al 2002), but contra, eg, Collar (2005), we consider S. torquatus as a superspecies comprising at least four species- level taxa: S. rubicola (European Stonechat), S. maurus (Asian Stonechat; a name that we prefer over the more established Siberian Stonechat, because the latter is a misnomer), S. torquatus (African Stonechat) and S. tectes (Réunion Stonechat). Urquhart (2002) mapped S. maurus armenicus as a breeder in north- west Iran south to the head of the Persian Gulf and through the southern Caspian region as far as the eastern province of Khorasan, with some records of S. m. variegatus (which breeds in the eastern Caucasus and northern Caspian) either on passage or wintering (eg specimens in The Natural History Museum, Tring, the Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, and Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor). In addition, Schweizer (2003) reported a sight record of European Stonechat S. rubicola in winter (March 2001) from Semnan Province in northern Iran. Interest in the ornithology of Iran currently appears to be burgeoning, with increasing numbers of both nationals and foreigners working on the country’s avifauna, reflected in a great many publications in recent years and a revised checklist of the country’s birds (Scott & Adhami 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Saxicola Dacotiae
    Saxicola dacotiae -- (Meade-Waldo, 1889) ANIMALIA -- CHORDATA -- AVES -- PASSERIFORMES -- MUSCICAPIDAE Common names: Fuerteventura Stonechat; Canary Chat; Canary Islands Bush Chat; Canary Islands Chat; Canary Islands Stonechat European Red List Assessment European Red List Status NT -- Near Threatened, (IUCN version 3.1) Assessment Information Year published: 2015 Date assessed: 2015-03-31 Assessor(s): BirdLife International Reviewer(s): Symes, A. Compiler(s): Ashpole, J., Burfield, I., Ieronymidou, C., Pople, R., Wheatley, H. & Wright, L. Assessment Rationale European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT) EU27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT) This species, endemic to Europe and the EU27, has a moderately small population which approaches the threshold for classification as Vulnerable. It also has a very small range, which is in decline owing to ongoing habitat loss and degradation; however, its population is not severely fragmented, nor is it restricted to ten locations or fewer. For these reasons it is listed as Near Threatened in both Europe and the EU27. Occurrence Countries/Territories of Occurrence Native: Spain; Canary Is. (to ES) Population The European population is estimated at 13,400-15,500 mature individuals. The entire population is found in the EU27. For details of national estimates, see Supplementary PDF. Trend Although the estimated population exceeds the estimate provided by Bibby and Hill (1987), this is not necessarily indicative of an increase as differences in methodology mean that such estimates are difficult to compare, and the earlier study may not have properly considered detection probability (Seoane et al. 2010). Development for tourism remains a threat but its rate has probably decreased in recent years; however, overgrazing by livestock appears to be increasing and is thought to be impacting the species through habitat degradation (A.
    [Show full text]
  • Saxicola Torquata, All Breeding Twithin the Palearctic Or the Ethiopian Regions (Vaurie 1959)
    Identification and European Status of eastern Stonechats Iain S. Robertson The eastern races of the Stonechat look very different from the familiär west European ones. Some might even be dismissed as Whinchats. Of 25 in western Europe, more than half have been in the last three years here are about 24 races of the Stonechat Saxicola torquata, all breeding Twithin the Palearctic or the Ethiopian regions (Vaurie 1959). Eight breed in the Palearctic: two west European races, S. t. rubicola and S. t. hibernans, and six eastern forms, which are distinct from those of western Europe, but cause identification problems. Although at least 25 eastern Stonechats have been recorded in west Europe since 1883 (see later section), there is little information available to continued... [Brit. Birds, 70: 237-245, June 1977] 237 238 Eastern Stonechats help the average birdwatcher. Those works which do contain descriptions tend to concentrate on adult males, but it is the female or immature plumages that are most likely to cause difficulties. This paper attempts to simplify the problem of field identification; it is based on a study of skins in the British Museum (Natural History), the descriptions of British and Continental records, the available literature and correspondence with observers who have experience of the eastern subspecies. General features Eastern Stonechats show wide variation throughout their ranges, but there are features common to most races: the most important is the unmarked rump and uppertail-coverts. The colour of the rump patch varies considerably, and is dealt with in detail under the individual races, but it is always unmarked by dark streaks or spots.
    [Show full text]