DOCSLIB.ORG

Report of Candidate Qualifications 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Judicial Merit Selection Commission Report of Candidate Qualifications 2020 Date Draft Report Issued: Thursday, January 14, 2021 Date and Time: Final Report Issued: Noon, Tuesday, January 19, 2021 Judicial candidates are not free to seek or accept commitments until Tuesday, January 19, 2021, at Noon. Judicial Merit Selection Commission Sen. Luke A. Rankin, Chairman Erin B. Crawford, Chief Counsel Rep. G. Murrell Smith Jr., Vice-Chairman Emma Dean, Counsel Sen. Ronnie A. Sabb Sen. Scott Talley Rep. J. Todd Rutherford Rep. Chris Murphy Hope Blackley-Logan Lucy Grey McIver Andrew N. Safran J.P. “Pete” Strom Jr. Post Office Box 142 Columbia, South Carolina 29202 (803) 212-6623 January 14, 2021 Dear Members of the General Assembly: Enclosed is the Judicial Merit Selection Commission’s Report of Candidate Qualifications. This Report is designed to assist you in determining how to cast your vote. The Commission is charged by law with ascertaining whether judicial candidates are qualified for service on the bench. In accordance with this mandate, the Commission has thoroughly investigated all judicial candidates for their suitability for judicial service. The Commission’s finding that a candidate is qualified means that the candidate satisfies both the constitutional criteria for judicial office and the Commission’s evaluative criteria. The attached Report details each candidate’s qualifications as they relate to the Commission’s evaluative criteria. Judicial candidates are prohibited from asking for your commitment until 12:00 Noon on Tuesday, January 19, 2021. Further, members of the General Assembly are not permitted to issue letters of introduction, announcements of candidacy, statements detailing a candidate’s qualifications, or commitments to vote for a candidate until 12:00 Noon on Tuesday, January 19, 2021. In summary, no member of the General Assembly should, orally or in writing, communicate about a candidate’s candidacy until this designated time after the release of the Judicial Merit Selection Commission’s Report of Candidate Qualifications. If you find a candidate violating the pledging prohibitions or if you have questions about this report, please contact Erin B. Crawford, Chief Counsel to the Commission, at (803) 212-6689. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Senator Luke A. Rankin Judicial Merit Selection Commission Sen. Luke A. Rankin, Chairman Erin B. Crawford, Chief Counsel Rep. G. Murrell Smith Jr., Vice-Chairman Emma Dean, Counsel Sen. Ronnie A. Sabb Sen. Scott Talley Rep. J. Todd Rutherford Rep. Chris Murphy Hope Blackley-Logan Lucy Grey McIver Andrew N. Safran J.P. “Pete” Strom Jr. Post Office Box 142 Columbia, South Carolina 29202 (803) 212-6623 January 14, 2021 Dear Fellow Members of the General Assembly: This letter is written to call your attention to issues raised during the December 2003, Judicial Merit Selection hearings concerning a judicial candidate’s contact with members of the General Assembly, as well as third parties contacting members on a candidate’s behalf. It is also to remind you of these issues for the current screening. Section 2-19-70(C) of the South Carolina Code contains strict prohibitions concerning candidates seeking or legislators giving their pledges of support or implied endorsement through an introduction prior to 48 hours after the release of the final report of the Judicial Merit Selection Commission (“Commission”). The purpose of this section is to ensure that members of the General Assembly have full access to the report prior to being asked by a candidate to pledge his or her support. The final sentence of Section 2-19-70(C) provides that “the prohibitions of this section do not extend to an announcement of candidacy by the candidate and statements by the candidate detailing the candidate’s qualifications” (emphasis added). Candidates may not, however, contact members of the Commission regarding their candidacy. Please note that six members of the Commission are also legislators. In April 2000, the Commission determined that Section 2-19-70(C) means no member of the General Assembly should engage in any form of communication, written or verbal, concerning a judicial candidate before the 48- hour period expires following the release of the Commission’s report. The Commission would like to clarify and reiterate that until at least 48 hours have expired after the Commission has released its final report of candidate qualifications to the General Assembly, only candidates, and not members of the General Assembly, are permitted to issue letters of introduction, announcements of candidacy, or statements detailing the candidates’ qualifications. The Commission would again like to remind members of the General Assembly that a violation of the screening law is likely a disqualifying offense and must be considered when determining a candidate’s fitness for judicial office. Further, the law requires the Commission to report any violations of the pledging rules by members of the General Assembly to the House or Senate Ethics Committee, as may be applicable. Should you have any questions regarding this letter or any other matter pertaining to the judicial screening process, please do not hesitate to call Erin B. Crawford, Chief Counsel to the Commission, at (803) 212-6689. Sincerely, Senator Luke A. Rankin Chairman TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... i QUALIFIED AND NOMINATED Court of Appeals Seat 5, Chief Judge The Honorable James E. Lockemy ...............................1 Seat 6 The Honorable Aphrodite Konduros ............................5 Seat 8 The Honorable DeAndrea Gist Benjamin ..................10 The Honorable Deborah Brooks Durden ....................15 The Honorable Jerry Deese Vinson Jr. .......................21 Circuit Court 4th Judicial Circuit, Seat 2 The Honorable Michael S. Holt .................................29 5th Judicial Circuit, Seat 3 The Honorable Robert E. Hood ..................................34 9th Judicial Circuit, Seat 3 The Honorable Roger M. Young Sr. ..........................37 13th Judicial Circuit, Seat 3 A. Lance Crick ...........................................................43 Patrick C. Fant III .......................................................53 G. D. Morgan Jr. .........................................................57 14th Judicial Circuit, Seat 1 Robert Bonds ..............................................................61 Tameaka A. Legette ...................................................66 14th Judicial Circuit, Seat 2 The Honorable Carmen Tevis Mullen ........................74 15th Judicial Circuit, Seat 2 The Honorable Benjamin H. Culbertson ....................78 At-Large, Seat 1 The Honorable George M. McFaddin Jr. ...................81 At-Large, Seat 2 The Honorable R. Kirk Griffin ...................................85 At-Large, Seat 3 The Honorable Clifton Newman ................................89 At-Large, Seat 4 The Honorable Edward Walter “Ned” Miller ............92 At-Large, Seat 5 The Honorable J. Mark Hayes II ................................96 At-Large, Seat 6 The Honorable William Henry Seals Jr. ..................101 At-Large, Seat 7 The Honorable J. Cordell Maddox Jr. ......................105 At-Large, Seat 8 The Honorable David Craig Brown .........................107 At-Large, Seat 9 The Honorable Jennifer Blanchard McCoy ..............110 At-Large, Seat 10 The Honorable Jocelyn Newman .............................114 At-Large, Seat 12 H. Steven DeBerry IV ..............................................117 B. Alex Hyman .........................................................123 The Honorable Dale E. Van Slambrook ...................127 Family Court 7th Judicial Circuit, Seat 1 Jonathan W. Lounsberry ......................................... 133 The Honorable Erika L. McJimpsey ...................... 143 Angela J. Moss ....................................................... 150 Administrative Law Court Seat 3 Stephanie N. Lawrence .............................................155 Robert L. Reibold .....................................................161 Debra Sherman Tedeschi ..........................................165 Seat 6 The Honorable S. Phillip “Phil” Lenski ...................173 QUALIFIED, BUT NOT NOMINATED Circuit Court 13th Judicial Circuit, Seat 3 Steven Edward Buckingham ....................................178 Will Grove ................................................................185 At-Large, Seat 12 Erin E. Bailey ...........................................................190 Brett H. Bayne ..........................................................197 The Honorable Daniel McLeod Coble .....................206 Meredith Long Coker ...............................................213 Regina Hollins Lewis ...............................................220 William Vickery Meetze ..........................................229 David W. Miller .......................................................234 Franklin G. Shuler Jr. ...............................................241 Kate Whetstone Usry ................................................250 S. Boyd Young .........................................................257 Family Court 7th Judicial Circuit, Seat 1 Robert “Rob” Rhoden ..............................................261 Administrative Law Court Seat 3 Anthony R. Goldman ...............................................268 The Honorable Crystal Rookard
Recommended publications
  • The Honorable Judge Sara J. Harper Profile Highlights

    The Honorable Judge Sara J. Harper Profile Highlights

    The Honorable Judge Sara J. Harper Profile Highlights: • Attorney, human rights activist, mother and judge • First woman appointed to the Marine Corps judiciary • Retired from U.S. Marine Corps as Lieutenant Colonel in 1986 • Co-founded the first Victims’ Rights program in the country • First African American woman to win a seat on the Ohio Court of Appeals • Ohio Veterans Hall of Fame Inductee • Ohio Civil Rights Hall of Fame Inductee • National Bar Association’s Hall of Fame Inductee Judge Sara J. Harper (born August 10, 1926) grew up in Cleveland in Outhwaite Estates, a public housing complex in Cleveland. Her passion for service began early at the age of eight, when she got involved in Republican Party politics. Throughout her lifetime, she attended party meetings, distributed literature, and would take her mother lunch on election day, while she worked polling places as a Republican booth worker. • In 2014, Judge Sara J. Harper received recognition for her exemplary service from the Republican National Committee. Her Distinguished Career Judge Sara J. Harper graduated from John Adams High School in the Cleveland Metropolitan School District. After graduating from Cleveland College in 1948, Sara J. Harper went on to become the first African-American woman to graduate from Case Western Reserve University’s School of Law when she earned her degree in 1952. • Judge Harper later served as president of the Case Western Reserve University Law School Alumni Association. And, in 2017, Judge Sara J. Harper was honored by the Case Western Reserve University Trailblazer Project, as a distinguished alumnus of color who made history at Case Western Reserve University, in the community, and beyond.
  • Report of the Judges of the Court on Managing Transitions in the Judiciary

    Report of the Judges of the Court on Managing Transitions in the Judiciary

    30 January 2020 Report of the judges of the Court on Managing Transitions in the Judiciary I. Introduction 1. “Transitions”, for purposes of this memorandum, means the process of bringing the service of judges to a close upon the statutory end of their term; as the replacement judges commence their service. 2. A key challenge in the management of transitions in the judiciary is that posed by the end of mandate of one-third of the Court’s judges every three years. This necessitates proper management of the circumstances resulting in the continuation in office of a judge who remains at the Court to complete a trial or appeal in accordance with article 36(10) of the Rome Statute, even though her or his mandate has expired.1 To date, 10 judges have had extensions of mandate under this provision, the duration of which has ranged from several months2 to several years (i.e. between approximately 1.5 – 4 years).3 The present report focuses on this issue. It is an issue the current Presidency has taken up on its own to try and resolve – long before its resonance in aspects of the Draft Non-Paper produced by the Bureau of the ASP. By way of the latter, States Parties have identified the possible need to ‘[d]evelop and implement clear and firm procedures for managing transitions in the judiciary, such as the use of alternate judges, handover strategies etc’.4 1 Article 36(10) provides: ‘Notwithstanding paragraph 9, a judge assigned to a Trial or Appeals Chamber in accordance with article 39 shall continue in office to complete any trial or appeal the hearing of which has already commenced before that Chamber’.
  • Full Article

    Full Article

    941 ZALMAN PRODUCTION (DO NOT DELETE) 12/17/2016 4:35 PM ELEPHANTS IN THE STATION HOUSE: SERIAL CRIMES, WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS, AND EXPANDING WRONGFUL CONVICTION ANALYSIS TO INCLUDE POLICE INVESTIGATION1 Marvin Zalman* Matthew Larson** ABSTRACT In this article we advocate that the study of miscarriages of justice be expanded to view the entirety of police crime investigation as a source of wrongful convictions. We set this proposal in a framework of how the inductive innocence paradigm was developed and analyze how the term “causation” is used in legal, scientific and case analysis. We then explore a subject not yet addressed by wrongful conviction scholarship but that may confront an investigator: whether an unsolved crime is the work of a serial criminal and whether a suspect is the serial criminal. We examine a convenience sample of forty-four exonerees convicted of crimes committed by thirty serial criminals. The analysis is aimed at opening up a discussion of the kind of complexity that investigators face in hard-to-solve cases. 1 We thank Sam Gross and the National Registry of Exonerations’ staff for providing case files. * Professor, Department of Criminal Justice, Wayne State University. ** Assistant Professor, Department of Criminal Justice, Wayne State University. 941 941 ZALMAN PRODUCTION (DO NOT DELETE) 12/17/2016 4:35 PM 942 Albany Law Review [Vol. 79.3 I. INTRODUCTION Wrongful conviction research, according to Bonventre, Norris, and West, includes identifying exoneration cases, “establishing rates” of wrongful convictions,
  • NECROPHILIC and NECROPHAGIC SERIAL KILLERS Approval Page

    NECROPHILIC and NECROPHAGIC SERIAL KILLERS Approval Page

    Running head: NECROPHILIC AND NECROPHAGIC SERIAL KILLERS Approval Page: Florida Gulf Coast University Thesis APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Christina Molinari Approved: August 2005 Dr. David Thomas Committee Chair / Advisor Dr. Shawn Keller Committee Member The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. NECROPHILIC AND NECROPHAGIC SERIAL KILLERS 1 Necrophilic and Necrophagic Serial Killers: Understanding Their Motivations through Case Study Analysis Christina Molinari Florida Gulf Coast University NECROPHILIC AND NECROPHAGIC SERIAL KILLERS 2 Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Literature Review............................................................................................................................ 7 Serial Killing ............................................................................................................................... 7 Characteristics of sexual serial killers ..................................................................................... 8 Paraphilia ................................................................................................................................... 12 Cultural and Historical Perspectives
  • Chapter 753 Circuit Courts

    Chapter 753 Circuit Courts

    Updated 2019−20 Wis. Stats. Published and certified under s. 35.18. September 17, 2021. 1 Updated 19−20 Wis. Stats. CIRCUIT COURTS 753.04 CHAPTER 753 CIRCUIT COURTS 753.01 Term of office. 753.077 Preservation of judgments. 753.016 Judicial circuit for Milwaukee County. 753.09 Jury. 753.03 Jurisdiction of circuit courts. 753.10 Attendance of officers, pay; opening court. 753.04 Writs, how issued; certiorari. 753.19 Operating costs; circuit court. 753.05 Seals. 753.22 When court to be held. 753.06 Judicial circuits. 753.23 Night and Saturday sessions. 753.0605 Additional circuit court branches. 753.24 Where court to be held. 753.061 Court; branch; judge. 753.26 Office and records to be kept at county seat. 753.065 Naturalization proceedings, venue. 753.30 Clerk of circuit court; duties, powers. 753.07 Circuit judges; circuit court reporters; assistant reporters; salaries; retire- 753.32 Clerks, etc., not to be appraisers. ment; fringe benefits. 753.34 Circuit court for Menominee and Shawano counties. 753.073 Expenses. 753.35 Rules of practice and trial court administration. 753.075 Reserve judges; service. 753.01 Term of office. The term of office of every elected cir- judges, officers and employees thereof with suitable accommoda- cuit judge is 6 years and until the successor is elected and quali- tions, adequately centralized and consolidated, and with the nec- fied, commencing with the August 1 next succeeding the election. essary furniture and supplies and make provision for its necessary History: 1975 c. 61, 178, 199, 422; 1977 c. 187 s. 92; Stats.
  • Themes in Criminal Law

    Themes in Criminal Law

    THEMES IN CRIMINAL LAW Class activities* Class 1 Jan. 6: Introduction Discussion questions 1. Describe as objectively and exhaustively as possible what happened. 2. What crimes, if any, can you identify? 3. Who committed those crimes? 4. Why do you think the crimes were committed? 5. What was the law enforcement reaction? 6. Do you agree with the law enforcement reaction? Why or why not? Class 2 Jan. 8 Criminal responsibility Socratic dialogue: 1) What is a crime from a legal point of view? 2) What is the theory of offence? What is it for? 3) What are the elements of a crime? 4) What is the actus reus? What are its elements? 5) What are the types of social harm? 6) What is the difference between definitional and underlying social harm? 7) What is mens rea? 8) What are the main types of mens rea? 9) What happens when mens rea is not explicitly included in the definition of the offence? 10) What is a subjective test? What is an objective test? Classes 3, 4 & 5 Jan 13, 15 & 20 Homicides Analyze if there was a crime, who committed the crime, and what type of crime it is. 1. Describe the facts. 2. Was there a crime? If so, what crime/s? If not, why do you think there was no crime? 3. If there was crime, what are its elements? Scenarios Analyze the following scenarios 1. Alex is helping his friend move into a downtown condo. While unloading a large mirror from the moving truck, the bright sunlight hits the mirror and reflects against the 40th floor of the skyscraper across the street which temporarily blinds a window washer and causes him to stumble.
  • Download Issue

    Download Issue

    YOUTH &POLICY No. 116 MAY 2017 Youth & Policy: The final issue? Towards a new format Editorial Group Paula Connaughton, Ruth Gilchrist, Tracey Hodgson, Tony Jeffs, Mark Smith, Jean Spence, Naomi Thompson, Tania de St Croix, Aniela Wenham, Tom Wylie. Associate Editors Priscilla Alderson, Institute of Education, London Sally Baker, The Open University Simon Bradford, Brunel University Judith Bessant, RMIT University, Australia Lesley Buckland, YMCA George Williams College Bob Coles, University of York John Holmes, Newman College, Birmingham Sue Mansfield, University of Dundee Gill Millar, South West Regional Youth Work Adviser Susan Morgan, University of Ulster Jon Ord, University College of St Mark and St John Jenny Pearce, University of Bedfordshire John Pitts, University of Bedfordshire Keith Popple, London South Bank University John Rose, Consultant Kalbir Shukra, Goldsmiths University Tony Taylor, IDYW Joyce Walker, University of Minnesota, USA Anna Whalen, Freelance Consultant Published by Youth & Policy, ‘Burnbrae’, Black Lane, Blaydon Burn, Blaydon on Tyne NE21 6DX. www.youthandpolicy.org Copyright: Youth & Policy The views expressed in the journal remain those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Editorial Group. Whilst every effort is made to check factual information, the Editorial Group is not responsible for errors in the material published in the journal. ii Youth & Policy No. 116 May 2017 About Youth & Policy Youth & Policy Journal was founded in 1982 to offer a critical space for the discussion of youth policy and youth work theory and practice. The editorial group have subsequently expanded activities to include the organisation of related conferences, research and book publication. Regular activities include the bi- annual ‘History of Community and Youth Work’ and the ‘Thinking Seriously’ conferences.
  • Sticksstones DISCUSSION QUESTIONS.Indd

    Sticksstones DISCUSSION QUESTIONS.Indd

    DISCUSSION QUESTIONS BROUGHT TO YOU BY EMILY BAZELON, AUTHOR OF STICKS AND STONES: Defeating the Culture of Bullying and Rediscovering the Power of Character and Empathy MONIQUE: CHAPTERS 1 AND 4 Emily defi nes bullying as physical or verbal abuse that is repeated over time and in- volves a power imbalance—one kid, or group of kids, lording it over another. Do you agree with that defi nition? Is there anything about it you would change? Research shows that boys are more likely to bully physically, and girls are more likely to use indirect means of hostility, like gossip and exclusion. Does that match your experience? Emily makes a point of saying that at the heart of many “mean girl” stories is at least one boy who is actively participating. Does that match your experience? At Woodrow Wilson School in Middletown, Conn., students in popular circles believed that social aggression was necessary to improve or maintain social status. Can school culture change the way ‘popularity’ is experienced? Monique’s mother, Alycia, tried to do everything she could to help her daughter. But her effort to speak out publically backfi red. What went wrong for Alycia? If you were in her position, what would you have done? What role did social media play in Monique’s story? What could Monique’s principal or assistant principal have done differently to stop the bullying? What do you think of the role Juliebeth played for Monique? What stops more students for standing up for kids who have been bullied, and what would it take to change that? What should the superintendent of the Middletown school district have done in re- sponse to Monique’s story? One student stood up for Monique on Facebook: her boxing teammate, Juliebeth.
  • 2015 Session Ļ

    2015 Session Ļ

    MEMBERS AND OFFICERS OF THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Ļ 2015 SESSION ļ STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA Biographies and Pictures Addresses and Telephone Numbers District Information District Maps (Excerpt from 2015 Legislative Manual) Corrected to March 24, 2015 EDITED BY CHARLES F. REID, CLERK HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA MEMBERS AND OFFICERS OF THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Ļ 2015 SESSION ļ STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA Biographies and Pictures Addresses and Telephone Numbers District Information District Maps (Excerpt from 2015 Legislative Manual) Corrected to March 24, 2015 EDITED BY CHARLES F. REID, CLERK HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA THE SENATE Officers of the Senate 1 THE SENATE The Senate is composed of 46 Senators elected on November 6, 2012 for terms of four years (Const. Art. III, Sec. 6). Pursuant to Sec. 2-1-65 of the 1976 Code, as last amended by Act 49 of 1995, each Senator is elected from one of forty-six numbered single-member senatorial districts. Candidates for the office of Senator must be legal residents of the district from which they seek election. Each senatorial district contains a popu- lation of approximately one/forty-sixth of the total popula- tion of the State based on the 2010 Federal Census. First year legislative service stated means the year the Mem- ber attended his first session. Abbreviations: [D] after name indicates Democrat, [R] after name indicates Republican; b. “born”; g. “graduated”; m. “married”; s. “son of”; d. “daughter of.” OFFICERS President, Ex officio, Lieutenant Governor McMASTER, Henry D. [R]— (2015–19)—Atty.; b.
  • Effects of Federal and State Bullying Laws on Religiously Affiliated Schools

    Effects of Federal and State Bullying Laws on Religiously Affiliated Schools

    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations Fall 2019 Effects of Federal and State Bullying Laws on Religiously Affiliated Schools Dawn W. Hiller Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Educational Administration and Supervision Commons Recommended Citation Hiller, D. W.(2019). Effects of Federal and State Bullying Laws on Religiously Affiliated Schools. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/5653 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EFFECTS OF FEDERAL AND STATE BULLYING LAWS ON RELIGIOUSLY AFFILIATED SCHOOLS by Dawn W. Hiller Bachelor of Arts University of South Carolina, 1990 Master of Education University of South Carolina, 2000 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Education Administration College of Education University of South Carolina 2019 Accepted by: Susan Bon, Major Professor Ed Cox, Committee Member Joseph Flora, Committee Member Karen Pettus, Committee Member Cheryl L. Addy, Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School © Copyright by Dawn W. Hiller, 2019 All Rights Reserved. ii DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this research to my wonderful parents. My mother always encouraged my desire for more knowledge. She passed away before seeing this dream of mine come true but I have felt her spirit with me throughout all of my classes and while I wrote this dissertation. I thank my father for all of his constant encouragement and love.
  • Is the Sunshine Chilly

    Is the Sunshine Chilly

    South Carolina Law Review Volume 55 Issue 4 SYMPOSIUM: COURT-ENFORCED Article 10 SECRECY Summer 2004 Settlements and Secrets: Is the Sunshine Chilly James E. Rooks Jr. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/sclr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Rooks, James E. Jr. (2004) "Settlements and Secrets: Is the Sunshine Chilly," South Carolina Law Review: Vol. 55 : Iss. 4 , Article 10. Available at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/sclr/vol55/iss4/10 This Symposium Paper is brought to you by the Law Reviews and Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in South Carolina Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Rooks: Settlements and Secrets: Is the Sunshine Chilly SETTLEMENTS AND SECRETS: Is THE SUNSHINE CHILLY? JAMES E. ROOKS JR." I. OPEN COURTS, CLOSED FILES ................................. 859 II. JUDICIAL AND LEGISLATIVE EFFORTS TO DEAL WITH OVERUSE AND ABUSE OF SECRECY ........................ 861 III. THE "CHILLED SETTLEMENTS" ARGUMENT ....................... 863 IV. FEDERAL JUDGES CONFRONT SECRET SETTLEMENTS ............... 865 V. DOES SECRECY PROMOTE SETrLEMENT? DOES SUNSHINE "CHILL" SETrLEMENTS? ... ....... ...... ...... ....... 870 VI. WHERE ARE THE CHILLED SETTLEMENTS? ...... ....... ....... 872 VII. FROM SPECULATION TO SOPHISTRY .............................. 874 I. OPEN COURTS, CLOSED FILES American lawyers recognize that the openness of the courts, and the public nature of their proceedings and records, are hallmarks of our system ofjustice. Yet few lawyers who represent consumers in United States courts can be unaware of the national public policy debate on the frequent use and abuse of secrecy in our civil justice system. "Secrecy," in this debate, refers collectively to a number of legal mechanisms that may be used to conceal litigation information from the public, from government regulators, from attorneys handling similar cases, and in some cases even from other courts.
  • Academy Sports and Outdoors Concealed Carry Policy

    Academy Sports and Outdoors Concealed Carry Policy

    Academy Sports And Outdoors Concealed Carry Policy snigglesSmarmy herUlick duotone. teething Dawdling his doubled and reinvent spongiest end-on. Claudio Accompanying brick her confidante and radiative writhes Adolf stupefies braises, and but fantasy Godwin pitter-patter. onerously While i was incorrect, if we express, kann ohne diese ihrer legitimen geschäftsinteressen verarbeiten, sports academy sports car and marine corps veteran jacob The Company currently retains Meridian as an advisor on executive pay related items. Where their shares under such fiscal year earlier effective internal controls could be used shoot him. Following this offering, we uphold to met these exemptions. BBB Business Profiles are presume to change cause any time. Outdoors store in Hoover, Ala. Never changed so well. Lr semiautomatic rimfire pistol features an assigned. Beginning a year, we started to see improvements resulting from these initiatives. Within the footwear merchandise division, the width was driven by an caught in eternal and casual footwear, partially offset by step decrease in athletic footwear. Our sporting goods customers ranked value as the step important driver in deciding where to shop and Academy was rated as phone top retailer for adultery among sporting goods retailers. When seeing three boys fled the store Joey Tapley who was approaching Academy drew his concealed carry handgun and further them to discern the. Here become the policies of 13 major stores that still sell firearms in the US. It is possible please buy firearms with the Academy Credit Card. 2 reviews for Academy Sports Outdoor 16 stars I ordered a shirt can a. Represents our contractual payments under our Monitoring Agreement say the Adviser.