DOCSLIB.ORG

Placebo and Drug Kits in Clinical Trial Design

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Placebo and Drug Kits in Clinical Trial Design Medicines regulation WHO Drug Information Vol. 31, No. 2, 2017 Placebo and drug kits in clinical trial design New and improved medicinal products are continuously needed throughout the world to prevent and treat diseases. Good quality clinical trials are key in bringing new safe and effective medicines to patients. Some information is outlined below on specific aspects of conducting clinical studies, namely the use of placebo as a control intervention and the use of drug kits for effective blinding of trials. Introduction The use of placebo Before novel medicinal products are A placebo has been defined as “an inert introduced into widespread use, they must substance or sham procedure that is be assessed in clinical trials. Randomized provided to research participants with controlled trials (RCTs) are often considered the aim of making it impossible for them, the gold standard in this regard, although and usually the researchers themselves, to other study designs can also yield valid know who is receiving an active or inactive research results. Clinical trials should be intervention.”(1) designed in such a way that the effects of Placebos typically consist of the the experimental intervention are compared ingredients employed in the medicinal with those of a control intervention. In a product under study minus the active controlled trial, the subjects in the study and ingredient, making them inert. The inactive control group should be drawn from the ingredients (excipients) employed in a same population, and should preferably be pharmaceutical product must be “generally assigned to the groups by randomization to recognized as safe”1 for use in humans, remove bias in the allocation of participants. otherwise a medicinal product would not be Where feasible, clinical trials should be authorized for use. blinded, so that the subjects – and in In vaccine research, the term “placebo” is double-blinded studies also the researchers also applied to non-inert substances. In this – are unaware of who is receiving which context, an existing vaccine not studied in intervention. This helps to avoid behaviour the trial is added to both the investigational changes that may influence the study and the control product in order to avoid outcomes.(1) giving an “empty” injection to the subjects Two questions are discussed below in the control group. A disadvantage of that commonly arise in developing and this approach is that it complicates the evaluating clinical trial designs, namely in what situations it is acceptable to use placebo 1 The U.S. Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act makes in the control arm, and how to achieve provision for food additives to be shown to be effective blinding. “Generally Recognized As Safe” (GRAS) through scientific procedures. Similar approaches are used in other jurisdictions. This article originates from a request for advice sent to the WHO Prequalification Team. We thank Dr Matthias Stahl for his technical input. The article outlines selected concepts as found in published literature. It should not be considered as WHO guidance on the subject. 158 WHO Drug Information Vol. 31, No. 2, 2017 Medicines regulation Placebo and drug kits in clinical trial design evaluation of the safety and reactogenicity of in the target population, (3) has been proven the vaccine under study.(2) ineffective in the target population, (4) has As the risks associated with the placebo an unknown or uncertain public health product are typically very low or non- impact in the target population which is existent, the use of placebos is generally to be evaluated against a placebo; or (5) is uncontroversial where there is no not acceptable to target population (e.g. established effective intervention for the a vaccine containing porcine gelatine in issue being researched. Where an established populations that have religious restrictions effective intervention exists, on the other on the consumption of pork). However, the hand, the use of placebo often raises risks and benefits of conducting a placebo- controversy among members of research controlled design should always be weighed ethics committees (RECs), regulators, and against those of alternative trial designs such policy-makers. The CIOMS Guideline 5, as response-adaptive designs, observational Choice of control in clinical trials, advises as studies, or historical comparisons.(1,2) follows: The use of placebo may require risk “As a general rule, the research ethics mitigation even if no established effective committee must ensure that research intervention exists. For example, in the participants in the control group of a trial Ebola vaccine trial conducted in Guinea of a diagnostic, therapeutic, or preventive the use of a placebo or an unrelated vaccine intervention receive an established effective in the control group was deemed ethically intervention. unacceptable as it would leave vulnerable Placebo may be used as a comparator individuals unprotected against Ebola without providing the established effective virus disease when a potentially effective intervention to participants only if: investigational vaccine was available. • there are compelling scientific reasons for Instead, vaccination of control subjects using placebo; and was delayed by 21 days, the minimal delay • delaying or withholding the established that would enable researchers to determine effective intervention will result in no more vaccine efficiency.(3) than a minor increase above minimal risk to the participant and risks are minimized, The use of drug kits including through the use of effective Specifically for researching new mitigation procedures.” pharmaceuticals, clinical trials should Risks and benefits of other study interventions preferably have a randomized double-blind and procedures should be evaluated according design. Blinding can take place at several to the criteria set out in Guideline 4 – levels: it may apply to the researchers who Potential individual benefits and risks of assign subjects to groups, the subjects research.”(1) themselves, the health care workers who A WHO expert group has identified five take care of patients in a study, and the situations when placebos may be acceptable researchers who record and assess the in the context of vaccine trials despite outcomes.(4) the existence of an effective intervention, A method of blinding clinical trials namely when the existing vaccine: (1) is is the use of drug kits, in which the not affordable or not accessible to the target investigational or control product is population, (2) has not been proven effective packaged for distribution to investigational 159 Medicines regulation WHO Drug Information Vol. 31, No. 2, 2017 Placebo and drug kits in clinical trial design sites. Each kit is labelled with a neutral ID, a kit is assigned to the next patient. This is without indication of its content, enabling successful blinding at the expense of wasting investigators to administer study or control one kit per subject.(5) drug to subjects in a blinded manner An analogous approach to the “waste- without the assistance of an unblinded one-kit” method could be used to blind pharmacist.(5) Each kit contains sufficient a trial where the control subjects receive product for a extended period, typically two a delayed intervention, by scheduling or three weeks,(6) although the quantity will additional visits in both groups. In the Ebola vary depending on the study design. vaccine trial conducted in Guinea this was The key component to the successful use not possible due to operational challenges; of drug kits is the creation of a kit list, where instead, to reduce the risk of bias arising kit IDs are randomly assigned to kit types from behaviour changes that might follow (investigational or control). This kit list is vaccination, participants were informed used at the time of manufacture to label the that it is not known if the vaccine works, kits, during shipping to track the kits, and and that they must still take steps to avoid during the study to assign kits to patients.(6) infection.(3) Many trials involve multiple clinical In practice, the design of algorithms for sites. To avoid the need for an unblinded coding and supplying blinded drug kits pharmacist at each site, use is often made of will take into account a range of factors a randomization centre to randomize study specific to each study, such as any additional subjects and manage the supply of drug kits trial arms, kit inventory size, enrolment i.e., track drug kit inventory at each site, rate at the sites, and times between subject ship kits to sites, and assign kits to patients. enrolments in relation to shipment In this way, information on whether a kit time for replacement kits. Operational contains test or control product does not characteristics of different types of kit accompany the kit but is available from the lists(6) and supply methods(5) have been randomization centre.(6) discussed in published literature. A criterion The coding used in creating the kit list has also been proposed for evaluating the and the distribution patterns and resupply strength of blinding in a clinical trial, even methods employed are key factors in if the researcher has been unblinded to blinding a clinical trial. A good design the contents of one or more kits. This is of should achieve a balance between kit interest because it is not uncommon for an efficiency and successful blinding. This investigator to be unblinded to a subject’s can be illustrated by two simple scenarios. treatment assignment for safety reasons or In a trial where each kit handed out to a from the subject’s adverse event or efficacy subject triggers a replacement by a single profile.(5) kit of the same type, no kits are wasted but the researcher can deduce that the patients Conclusions dosed with these two kits belong to the With today’s swift pace of product same study arm. In the opposite scenario development in a globalized market, the randomization centre would send designing, assessing, and authorizing clinical two replacement kits (one active and one trials can be challenging.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Homeopathy and Psychological Therapies
    Entry Homeopathy and Psychological Therapies Davide Donelli * and Michele Antonelli AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Definition: Homeopathy is a popular, although highly debated, medicinal practice based on the administration of remedies in which active substances are so diluted that no detectable trace of them remains in the final product. This hypothesis paper aims to outline a possible reinterpreta- tion of homeopathy in the light of psychological therapies in order to improve its clinical safety and sustainability. Keywords: homeopathy; psychology; reinterpretation; hypothesis 1. Introduction Homeopathy is a popular, although highly debated, medicinal practice. In Italy, for ex- ample, it is estimated that, even if with a slightly declining trend, around 4.1% of the entire population (almost 2.5 million people) occasionally or regularly seeks homeopathic care, and these data, collected in 2013, suggest that homeopathy is the most used Complemen- tary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) by Italians [1]. Epidemiological studies aimed to assess the worldwide prevalence of homeopathy use have reported similar data for other high-income countries [2]. Homeopathy was first invented by the German doctor Samuel Hahnemann (1755–1843), and it is based on the administration of remedies in which active substances are so diluted that no detectable trace of them remains in the final product [3]. In his empirical studies, Citation: Donelli, D.; Antonelli, M. Hahnemann reported that the self-administration of a common antimalarial medicinal Homeopathy and Psychological Ther- plant (Cinchona) resulted in the occurrence of the same symptoms of malaria, but to a Encyclopedia 2021 1 apies.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocps) Used in the NM Family Planning Program (FPP
    The following slides are intended to familiarize nurses and clinicians with oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) used in the NM Family Planning Program (FPP). The FPP does not intend for this information to supersede the Family Planning Protocol particularly on the requirement for Public Health Nurses in the Public Health Offices to consult a clinician as stated in the Protocol when in doubt or if it is necessary to switch the client’s OCP type. 1 2 Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) contain two hormones; estrogen and progestin. In general, any combined OCP is good for most women who are eligible to take estrogen according to the CDC U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria (MEC). Once again, refer to the US MEC chart to find out if OCP is a suitable choice for clients with specific health conditions. To learn a little bit about what each hormone does, the FPP is providing the following summary: Estrogen: provides endometrial stability = menstrual cycle control. A higher estrogen dose increases the venous thromboembolism (VTE) or clot risk but OCP clot risk is still less harmful than the clot risk related to pregnancy and giving birth. Progestin: provides most of the contraceptive effect by ‐Preventing luteinizing hormone (LH) surge /ovulation ‐Thickening the cervical mucus to prevent sperm entry. Two major OCP formations are available. Monophasic: There is only one dose of estrogen and progestin in each active pill in the packet; and Multiphasic: There are varying doses of hormones, particularly progestin in the active pills. 3 Section 3 of the FPP Protocol contains the OCP Substitute Table, which groups OCPs into 6 classes according to the estrogen dosage, the type of progestin and the formulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicotine and Behavioral Markers of Risk for Schizophrenia: a Double-Blind, Placebo- Controlled, Cross-Over Study Lana Dépatie, M.Sc., Gillian A
    Nicotine and Behavioral Markers of Risk for Schizophrenia: A Double-Blind, Placebo- Controlled, Cross-Over Study Lana Dépatie, M.Sc., Gillian A. O’Driscoll, Ph.D., Anne-Lise V. Holahan, B.Sc., Victoria Atkinson, R.N., Joseph X. Thavundayil, M.D., N. Ng Ying Kin, Ph.D., and Samarthji Lal, M.D. We investigated the effect of nicotine on three behavioral groups. A Drug ϫ Monitoring condition interaction (p Ͻ .01) markers of risk for schizophrenia: sustained attention on pursuit gain indicated that nicotine significantly (using the Continuous Performance Task (CPT)), increased pursuit gain in the no-monitoring condition in antisaccade performance, and smooth pursuit. Smooth patients and controls equally, but did not improve pursuit pursuit was investigated in two conditions, one in which in the monitoring condition. Thus, improvement in pursuit attention was enhanced (monitoring target changes) and may have been mediated via an effect on attention rather one in which attention was not enhanced (no monitoring). than by an effect on oculomotor function per se. In patients, Patients with schizophrenia (n ϭ 15) and controls (n ϭ 14) the magnitude of improvement in attention on nicotine was were given a 14-mg nicotine patch in a double-blind, correlated with the improvement on eye movement tasks. placebo-controlled, crossover design and plasma nicotine Thus, nicotine improves performance on both attention and concentrations were monitored. Nicotine concentrations oculomotor markers of risk for schizophrenia, possibly via were similar in both groups. A Group ϫ Drug interaction common mechanisms. (p Ͻ .02) on CPT hits indicated that nicotine improved [Neuropsychopharmacology 27:1056–1070, 2002] sustained attention in patients but not in controls.
    [Show full text]
  • Demystifying the Placebo Effect
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 9-2018 Demystifying the Placebo Effect Phoebe Friesen The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2775 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] DEMYSTIFYING THE PLACEBO EFFECT by PHOEBE FRIESEN A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Philosophy in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2018 © 2018 PHOEBE FRIESEN All Rights Reserved ii Demystifying the Placebo Effect by Phoebe Friesen This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Philosophy in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ___________ ____________________________________ Date [Peter Godfrey-Smith] Chair of Examining Committee ___________ ____________________________________ Date [Nickolas Pappas ] Executive Office Supervisory Committee: Peter Godfrey-Smith Jesse Prinz John Greenwood THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Demystifying the Placebo Effect by Phoebe Friesen Advisor: Peter Godfrey-Smith This dissertation offers a philosophical analysis of the placebo effect. After offering an overview of recent evidence concerning the phenomenon, I consider several prominent accounts of the placebo effect that have been put forward and argue that none of them are able to adequately account for the diverse instantiations of the phenomenon. I then offer a novel account, which suggests that we ought to think of the placebo effect as encompassing three distinct responses: conditioned placebo responses, cognitive placebo responses, and network placebo responses.
    [Show full text]
  • Placebo-Controlled Trials of New Drugs: Ethical Considerations
    Reviews/Commentaries/Position Statements COMMENTARY Placebo-Controlled Trials of New Drugs: Ethical Considerations DAVID ORENTLICHER, MD, JD als, placebo controls are not appropriate when patients’ health would be placed at significant risk (8–10). A placebo- controlled study for a new hair- uch controversy exists regarding sufficiently more effective than placebo to thickening agent could be justified; a the ethics of placebo-controlled justify its use. Finally, not all established placebo-controlled study for patients M trials in which an experimental therapies have been shown to be superior with moderate or severe hypertension therapy will compete with an already es- to placebo. If newer drugs are compared would not be acceptable (11). Similarly, if tablished treatment (or treatments). In with the unproven existing therapies, an illness causes problems when it goes such cases, argue critics, patients in the then patients may continue to receive untreated for a long period of time, a 52- control arm of the study should receive an drugs that are harmful without being week study with a placebo control is accepted therapy rather than a placebo. helpful. much more difficult to justify than a By using an active and effective drug, the Moreover, say proponents of placebo 6-week study (12). control patients would not be placed at controls, patients can be protected from When David S.H. Bell (13) explains risk for deterioration of their disease, and harm by “escape” criteria, which call for why placebo controls are unacceptable the study would generate more meaning- withdrawal from the trial if the patient for new drugs to treat type 2 diabetes, he ful results for physicians.
    [Show full text]
  • Homeopathy Is Marketed As a Safe, Natural and Holistic Treatment for a Range of Ailments and Illnesses, Including Another Way of Saying
    sense about... sense about... sense about... sense about... sense about... sense about...Homeo sense about... sense about...path sense about...yyy sense about... sense about... sense about... sense about... sense about... sense about... sense about... Homeopathy is marketed as a safe, natural and holistic treatment for a range of ailments and illnesses, including Another way of saying... arthritis, asthma, depression, eczema, diarrhoea, hayfever, 8lacebo 999 a prescription that is inert; that is, it does nothing, headaches, insomnia and toothache. Homeopathic products and like a sugar pill or water. From the Latin, 1 will please.) services have become a large industry. 8lacebo effect 9 an effect, biological, biochemical or Despite this, it has not been embraced by medical science. The physiological, that emerges from an inert treatment because scientific evidence shows that homeopathy acts only as a the patient believes it will work. See page 2 for how placebos work.) placebo and there is no scientific explanation of how it could work any other way. Not to be confused... HomeoHomeopathpathpathicic principles 8roven 999 0proving( is the method homeopaths use to determine the symptoms a substance causes with a view to Homeopathy is based on two beliefs: 1) like cures like; and 2) treating diseases with similar symptoms); after the process a the smaller the dose the more potent the cure. First, homeopaths substance is said to be 0proven(. Scientists use 0proven( to choose a substance that causes the same symptoms as the describe a statement that is, by logic, necessarily true. disease they want to treat. For example, the runny nose and watery eyes of a cold can be recreated by inhaling onion fumes, human and animal waste, dead plants, bacteria and minerals; it so onion juice can form the basis of a homeopathic preparation.
    [Show full text]
  • Placebo As a Treatment for Depression Walter A
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY 1994-VOL. 10, NO.4 265 REVIEW AND COMMENTARIES Placebo as a Treatment for Depression Walter A. Brown, M.D. The placebo response rate in depression consistently falls the psychotherapies (expectation of improvement, between 30 and 40%. Among more severely depressed support, mobilization of hope) are provided with pill patients antidepressants offer a clear advantage over placebo treatment. placebo; among less severely depressed patients and those The placebo response in depression has been viewed with a relatively short episode duration the placebo as a nuisance rather than as a therapeutic and research response rate is close to 50% and often indistinguishable opportunity. I propose that the initial treatment for from the response rate to antidepressants. In the selected depressed patients should be four to six weeks of treatment of depression none of the psychotherapies have placebo. Patients so treated should be informed that the consistently been shown to offer an advantage over pill placebo pill contains no drug but that this treatment can placebo. This is not entirely surprising given the fact that be helpful. [Neuropsychopharmacology 10:265-269, the common, and arguably the therapeutic, features of 1994J 1992; 1991). KEY WORDS: Placebo; Depression; Psychotherapy; C. Beasley, personal communication [One Antidepressant explanation for this apparent increase in the placebo response is that the relative paucity of side effects with I am proposing that the initial treatment for a sizable the newer drugs makes the results of placebo-controlled portion of depressed patients should be four to six studies less biased by knowledge of which patients are weeks of placebo.
    [Show full text]
  • A Single Dose of Nicotine Enhances Reward Responsiveness in Nonsmokers: Implications for Development of Dependence Ruth S
    A Single Dose of Nicotine Enhances Reward Responsiveness in Nonsmokers: Implications for Development of Dependence Ruth S. Barr, Diego A. Pizzagalli, Melissa A. Culhane, Donald C. Goff, and A. Eden Evins Background: Tobacco smoking, driven by the addictive properties of nicotine, is the most prevalent preventable cause of death in the Western world. Accumulated evidence suggests that nicotine may increase appetitive responding for nondrug incentives in the environment. Methods: To test this hypothesis, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of the effect of a single dose of transdermal nicotine on reward responsiveness in 30 psychiatrically healthy nonsmokers. A novel signal detection task in which correct responses were differentially rewarded in a 3:1 ratio was used to assess the extent to which participants modulated their behavior as a function of reward. Results: Despite expected adverse effects such as nausea, nicotine significantly increased response bias toward the more frequently rewarded condition, at the expense of accuracy, independent of effects on attention or overall vigilance. Additionally, response bias on placebo was greater in participants who received nicotine in the first session, indicating that an effect of nicotine on reward responsiveness or reward-based learning persisted for at least 1 week. Conclusions: These findings suggest that a single dose of nicotine enhances response to non-drug-related rewards in the environment, with lasting effects. This effect may contribute to reinforcement of early smoking behavior and development of nicotine dependence. Key Words: Anhedonia, drug addiction, nicotine, nonsmokers, re- ducted in conjunction with a larger study of the effect of nicotine ward, reward responsiveness on cognitive performance in nonsmokers (7).
    [Show full text]
  • On the History of the Placebo Effect: a Brief Outline
    and M cal e ni d li ic C a Schott, J Clin Med Sci 2018, 2:1 l f S o c Journal of Clinical and Medical l i e a n n r c u e o s J Sciences Short Communication Open Access On the History of the Placebo Effect: A Brief Outline Heinz Schott* Department of Medicine, University of Bonn/Germany, Germany Received date: March 22, 2018; Accepted date: June 10, 2018; Published date: June 14, 2018 *Corresponding author: Heinz Schott, Faculty of the History of Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Bonn/Germany, Germany, Tel: +49-228-9265898; E- mail: [email protected] Copyright: © 2018 Heinz Schott. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Short Communication “magnetizing” or “mesmerizing” propagated first by Franz Anton Mesmer (1734-1815), a medical doctor in Vienna in the 1770s. The The placebo effect (and maybe still more the nocebo effect) is one of “magnetic sleep” induced by the medical doctor should produce a the greatest challenges for academic medicine. There are numerous “beneficial crisis” supporting the healing power of nature and restoring examples for their effectiveness regarding the literature of medical the disturbed harmony within the body. history. Let us consider the most extreme situations: Patients suffering from a disease with an infest prognosis may recover unexpectedly due Such an approach was based on the early modern natural to the placebo effect of a special manipulation or belief sometimes philosophy of the 16th and 17th centuries admiring Nature (Latin: called 'miraculous healing' (of course, academic medicine must not natura) as a divine (female) power, the mysteries of which should be rely on it), on the other hand, healthy people may be killed by the revealed by physicians and natural scientists for the benefit of nocebo effect of a frightening imagination e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Placebo Effect David C
    PATIENT PAGE Section Editors The placebo effect David C. Spencer, MD Steven Karceski, MD Joseph H. Friedman, WHAT IS A CLINICAL RESEARCH TRIAL? In of a placebo treatment does not create a dangerous MD the medical world, a clinical research trial or clinical situation for a patient. In the end, all patients benefit Richard Dubinsky, research study is usually done to prove whether a new from studies that are carefully done using a placebo, MD medication or therapy is effective, before it becomes so that the true effect of the treatment can be fully an approved and widely used treatment. Patients understood. with the target disease are often asked to take part in clinical research trials. To show that the new treat- HOW DO PLACEBOS WORK? How placebos work ment is truly effective, it is often compared to a is still a mystery. It is important to understand that placebo. not all placebo effects are good. Just as some patients improve with the power of positive thinking, some WHAT IS A PLACEBO? Placebos are usually get worse and drop out of research studies because of thought of as “sugar pills.” They are important the side effects caused by the placebo. In a recent, “sham” or phony treatments that are used to keep well-publicized and fascinating study of Parkinson doctors and patients honest in testing new drugs or disease (PD), it was discovered that the patients who procedures. To prove that a drug works, it is gener- improved with placebo had changes in their brain ally tested against a placebo: a “dummy” medication that were identical to the changes caused by the ac- that should have no effect on the condition.
    [Show full text]
  • When Is a Placebo Effect Not an Effect?
    I THE SCIENTIFIC BASIS FOR COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE When is a placebo effect not an effect? Richard Wigley Richard Wigley ABSTRACT – It is often stated, paradoxically, that snake. Many traditional herbal remedies, such as the FRCP ONZM, a treatment is not effective when trials have poppy, willow bark, cinchona, foxglove and Consultant in shown a placebo effect. This should be rephrased colchicine, have survived the RCT inquisition, Rheumatology and ‘that the tested treatment is not more effective though now chemically refined and standardised in Rehabilitation; than the placebo’ if we are not to confuse Western medicine with clearly defined undesired side previously Director ourselves and the public in the current debate on World Health effects. The conclusion was that it was customary, Organization complementary and alternative medicine. quite rational, and indeed ethical, to use placebo Collaborating (suggestion) in rehabilitation and in routine medical Centre for KEY WORDS: acupuncture, alternative medicine, practice. This implies a wider definition of placebo Epidemiology of pain, placebo which has often been limited to the deliberate misin- Rheumatic Disease, formation that the patient is having an active sub- Palmerston North The otherwise excellent review of reviews on the stance believed by the prescriber to be inactive. There Hospital, New effect of acupuncture published in the August 2006 are many aspects to placebo, which literally means ‘I Zealand issue of Clinical Medicine contains a conflict in terms shall be acceptable or pleasing’. As suggestions do not that needs to be resolved.1 On page one Derry et al always please, the term ‘nocebo’ was coined for the Clin Med state that the reviews ‘provide no robust evidence that opposite effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Cancer and the Power of Placebo an Interview with Paul A
    www.medscape.com Cancer and the Power of Placebo An Interview With Paul A. Offit, MD Lidia Schapira, MD, Paul A. Offit, MD December 13, 2013 Editor's Note: Although often grouped together, complementary and alternative medicines are different therapeutic approaches.[1] Complementary therapies are adjuncts to conventional care, often used in cancer patients for symptom control or to improve physical or emotional well-being during and after treatment. In contrast, alternative medicine involves therapies that substitute for conventional treatments. Both approaches are largely unregulated. In his book, Do You Believe in Magic? The Sense and Nonsense of Alternative Medicine, [2] Paul A. Offit, MD, explains why these unregulated industries continue to tempt millions of patients who are desperate for a cure, and who believe that anything that is "natural" must be good for them. Lidia Schapira, MD, spoke with Dr. Offit about his book and the use of alternative therapies for patients with cancer. Chemo Is More Efficacious Than Emu Oil and Prayer Dr. Schapira: Your book is a wonderful reminder of the power of stories that people tell themselves to explain illness and bring order to chaotic or terrifying experiences. You say that Steve Jobs "was seduced by bogus cancer cures." What is the seduction of alternative therapies for patients diagnosed with a serious illness, such as cancer? Dr. Offit: These alternative therapies -- in Jobs' case, acupuncture, bowel cleansings, and fruit and vegetable juices -- are seductive because they exist under an untouchable halo. They can only help; they can't possibly hurt and are far less frightening than chemotherapy, radiation, or surgery.
    [Show full text]