DOCSLIB.ORG

Benchmark Sample Report for Deltacrunch Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Benchmark Sample Report for Deltacrunch Contents Benchmark Sample report for deltaCrunch Contents Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Category score ................................................................................................................ 4 Score breakdown ........................................................................................................... 5 Summary of actions ................................................................................................................... 6 Recommended action list ............................................................................................. 6 Key findings and priority areas .............................................................................................. 7 ENGAGEMENT ................................................................................................................ 7 1.1 First impressions ................................................................................................. 7 1.2 Look and feel ....................................................................................................... 8 1.3 Tutorial ................................................................................................................... 8 1.4 Story and progression ....................................................................................... 9 1.5 Currency structure and complexity ................................................................ 10 GAME MECHANICS ....................................................................................................... 11 2.1 Risk reward ........................................................................................................... 11 2.2 Core loop .............................................................................................................. 12 2.3 Tasks ...................................................................................................................... 12 2.4 Gambling ............................................................................................................... 13 2.5 Collecting .............................................................................................................. 14 2.6 Cooperation ......................................................................................................... 14 2.7 Competition .......................................................................................................... 15 RETENTION ..................................................................................................................... 16 3.1 Repeat play .......................................................................................................... 16 3.2 Game difficulty, complexity and blockers ..................................................... 17 3.3 Rewarding and being generous ..................................................................... 18 3.4 Monetization blockers ....................................................................................... 19 3.5 Appointment setting .......................................................................................... 20 MONETIZATION ............................................................................................................ 22 4.1 First and second payment ................................................................................ 22 4.2 Virtual goods pricing and purchase process ............................................... 24 4.3 Inventory range ................................................................................................... 25 4.4 Use of bundles .................................................................................................... 26 4.5 Expensive items and VIP management ........................................................ 26 4.6 Skills based monetization ................................................................................. 28 4.7 Signposting .......................................................................................................... 28 4.8 Customizing ......................................................................................................... 29 4.9 Ad consumption .................................................................................................. 29 SOCIAL ............................................................................................................................ 32 4.1 Virality .................................................................................................................... 32 4.2 Sharing and gifting ............................................................................................. 34 4.3 Trading ................................................................................................................... 34 2 Introduction As the games industry re-orientates to free-to-play game development, it is essential that the player experience is put at the heart of the game from day one of the design process. Here at deltaDNA, we get excited about what game data can tell us and how it can be used to change the game. That is why we believe in actionable insights, not only gained through the platform tools, but also through our dedicated game design and analytics teams. We play test, benchmark and analyze games that integrate with deltaDNA. This report contains our thoughts about how your game is performing, what it does well, and any areas that could be improved. Overview DeltaDNA’s Benchmark delivers key recommendations to improve game design against best practice guidelines and also scores performance against a Benchmark of peer games within the same genre. Benchmark measures the effectiveness of your game against proven best practice in F2P design. As the games industry re-orientates to F2P game development, it is important that the player experience is put at the heart of the game. The Benchmark assessment is a valuable tool in ensuring your game creates an engaging experience for the user, maximizing retention and revenues. Benchmark is based on evaluating over 100 F2P games across a wide range of genres. The assessment uses evidence-based research to understand what aspects of F2P game design are effective in delivering: • An engaging environment for players • Good balancing of momentum and difficulty that increases retention to maximize the volume of players • Effective monetization to make the game profitable • Overall good player management The assessment is carried out in two stages. Firstly, there is an in-depth review on various aspects of the game design with feedback on positive aspects and recommendations for improvement. The game is then scored across 30 key categories and compared against a Benchmark drawn from a range of similar games as well as ranked against the highest scoring game in your specific genre and platform. 3 Category Scores Engagement deltaCrunch Game Social mechanics Benchmark Best in Genre Monetization Retention The table below details the key statistics for deltaCrunch (a match-three puzzle game) and compares them to our Benchmark and best in game genre figures. SECTION DELTACRUNCH BENCHMARK BEST IN GENRE Engagement 64.0% 70.0% 90.0% Game mechanics 42.9% 51.4% 75.7% Retention 38.0% 60.0% 82.0% Monetization 27.8% 44.4% 75.6% Social 33.3% 40.0% 60.0% DeltaCrunch reached an overall score of 40.7% compared to a Benchmark score of 52.8% and Best in Genre of 77.6%. The game scored below Benchmark due to poor scores in retention, monetization and social. DeltaCrunch scores a reasonable 64% for engagement, not far from Benchmark. This is driven by the general high quality of the game and a good early gameplay experience. First impressions are good; the initial levels quickly introduce the player to the gameplay. However, poor currency structure and broken navigation controls pulls the score down. The game mechanics section scores 42.9% with good marks in the core loop and risk reward mechanics, showing a solid gameplay structure that underpins the game. Unfortunately, retention doesn’t score as well, coming in at 38% compared to a Benchmark of 60%. DeltaCrunch features a defined end that hinders repeat play opportunities, harsh difficulty curve that will likely act as a blocker and no form of appointment setting to drive players back to the game. Monetization also fails to reach Benchmark with a score of 27.8%, due to the lack of monetization mechanics to drive revenue. Finally, social scores 33.3% compared to a Benchmark of 40%. Although there are incentives in place to reward players who gift and invite players to the game, it is not signposted or made explicit. 4 Score breakdown The following table sets out the criteria scores against the Benchmark and the Best in Genre score. Each criteria is a scored on a scale of 0 to 10. • 0-3 defines a mechanic missing or poorly implemented • 4-7 defines a mechanic that is adequately implemented • 8-10 defines a well implemented mechanic The game is compared to a Benchmark score based on a panel of similar games in the same genre and type. This shows the strengths and weaknesses of the individual game design which is then used to draw up a prioritized action list for consideration. The scores are indications of completeness and implementation and not a review score defining the quality of the game. SECTION CATEGORY DELTACRUNCH BENCHMARK BEST IN GENRE Engagement First impressions 8 7 9 Engagement
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Development and Validation of the Game User Experience Satisfaction Scale (Guess)
    THE DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE GAME USER EXPERIENCE SATISFACTION SCALE (GUESS) A Dissertation by Mikki Hoang Phan Master of Arts, Wichita State University, 2012 Bachelor of Arts, Wichita State University, 2008 Submitted to the Department of Psychology and the faculty of the Graduate School of Wichita State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2015 © Copyright 2015 by Mikki Phan All Rights Reserved THE DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE GAME USER EXPERIENCE SATISFACTION SCALE (GUESS) The following faculty members have examined the final copy of this dissertation for form and content, and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy with a major in Psychology. _____________________________________ Barbara S. Chaparro, Committee Chair _____________________________________ Joseph Keebler, Committee Member _____________________________________ Jibo He, Committee Member _____________________________________ Darwin Dorr, Committee Member _____________________________________ Jodie Hertzog, Committee Member Accepted for the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences _____________________________________ Ronald Matson, Dean Accepted for the Graduate School _____________________________________ Abu S. Masud, Interim Dean iii DEDICATION To my parents for their love and support, and all that they have sacrificed so that my siblings and I can have a better future iv Video games open worlds. — Jon-Paul Dyson v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Althea Gibson once said, “No matter what accomplishments you make, somebody helped you.” Thus, completing this long and winding Ph.D. journey would not have been possible without a village of support and help. While words could not adequately sum up how thankful I am, I would like to start off by thanking my dissertation chair and advisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Playing to Wait: a Taxonomy of Idle Games
    CHI 2018 Paper CHI 2018, April 21–26, 2018, Montréal, QC, Canada Playing to Wait: A Taxonomy of Idle Games Sultan A. Alharthi,1 Olaa Alsaedi,1 Zachary O. Toups,1 Joshua Tanenbaum,2 Jessica Hammer3 1Play & Interactive Experiences for Learning Lab, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA 2 Transformative Play Lab, Department of Informatics, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA 3HCI Institute / Entertainment Technology Center, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA {salharth, olaa}@nmsu.edu, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Figure 1. Sample of idle games featuring different styles of gameplay, interaction, and graphical or text interfaces. From left to right: Cookie Clicker [G50], AdVenture Capitalist [G38], Kittens Game [G16], Clicker Heroes [G66], and Cow Clicker [G39]. Screenshots taken cb author Alharthi. ABSTRACT are typically played in web browsers, on mobile devices, or Idle games are a recent minimalist gaming phenomenon in on a PC. Players progress with minimal-to-no interaction. Idle which the game is left running with little player interaction. games usually involve repeating a simple action (e.g., clicking, We deepen understanding of idle games and their characteris- rubbing, tapping) to accumulate resources as a core mechanic, tics by developing a taxonomy and identifying game features. an action that is regularly performed in play [55]. Most idle This paper examines 66 idle games using a grounded theory games also include mechanics that automate gameplay so the approach to analyze play, game mechanics, rewards, interac- game progresses by itself [50]. Although the interactions are tivity, progress rate, and user interface.
    [Show full text]
  • UPC Platform Publisher Title Price Available 730865001347
    UPC Platform Publisher Title Price Available 730865001347 PlayStation 3 Atlus 3D Dot Game Heroes PS3 $16.00 52 722674110402 PlayStation 3 Namco Bandai Ace Combat: Assault Horizon PS3 $21.00 2 Other 853490002678 PlayStation 3 Air Conflicts: Secret Wars PS3 $14.00 37 Publishers 014633098587 PlayStation 3 Electronic Arts Alice: Madness Returns PS3 $16.50 60 Aliens Colonial Marines 010086690682 PlayStation 3 Sega $47.50 100+ (Portuguese) PS3 Aliens Colonial Marines (Spanish) 010086690675 PlayStation 3 Sega $47.50 100+ PS3 Aliens Colonial Marines Collector's 010086690637 PlayStation 3 Sega $76.00 9 Edition PS3 010086690170 PlayStation 3 Sega Aliens Colonial Marines PS3 $50.00 92 010086690194 PlayStation 3 Sega Alpha Protocol PS3 $14.00 14 047875843479 PlayStation 3 Activision Amazing Spider-Man PS3 $39.00 100+ 010086690545 PlayStation 3 Sega Anarchy Reigns PS3 $24.00 100+ 722674110525 PlayStation 3 Namco Bandai Armored Core V PS3 $23.00 100+ 014633157147 PlayStation 3 Electronic Arts Army of Two: The 40th Day PS3 $16.00 61 008888345343 PlayStation 3 Ubisoft Assassin's Creed II PS3 $15.00 100+ Assassin's Creed III Limited Edition 008888397717 PlayStation 3 Ubisoft $116.00 4 PS3 008888347231 PlayStation 3 Ubisoft Assassin's Creed III PS3 $47.50 100+ 008888343394 PlayStation 3 Ubisoft Assassin's Creed PS3 $14.00 100+ 008888346258 PlayStation 3 Ubisoft Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood PS3 $16.00 100+ 008888356844 PlayStation 3 Ubisoft Assassin's Creed: Revelations PS3 $22.50 100+ 013388340446 PlayStation 3 Capcom Asura's Wrath PS3 $16.00 55 008888345435
    [Show full text]
  • Master List of Games This Is a List of Every Game on a Fully Loaded SKG Retro Box, and Which System(S) They Appear On
    Master List of Games This is a list of every game on a fully loaded SKG Retro Box, and which system(s) they appear on. Keep in mind that the same game on different systems may be vastly different in graphics and game play. In rare cases, such as Aladdin for the Sega Genesis and Super Nintendo, it may be a completely different game. System Abbreviations: • GB = Game Boy • GBC = Game Boy Color • GBA = Game Boy Advance • GG = Sega Game Gear • N64 = Nintendo 64 • NES = Nintendo Entertainment System • SMS = Sega Master System • SNES = Super Nintendo • TG16 = TurboGrafx16 1. '88 Games ( Arcade) 2. 007: Everything or Nothing (GBA) 3. 007: NightFire (GBA) 4. 007: The World Is Not Enough (N64, GBC) 5. 10 Pin Bowling (GBC) 6. 10-Yard Fight (NES) 7. 102 Dalmatians - Puppies to the Rescue (GBC) 8. 1080° Snowboarding (N64) 9. 1941: Counter Attack ( Arcade, TG16) 10. 1942 (NES, Arcade, GBC) 11. 1943: Kai (TG16) 12. 1943: The Battle of Midway (NES, Arcade) 13. 1944: The Loop Master ( Arcade) 14. 1999: Hore, Mitakotoka! Seikimatsu (NES) 15. 19XX: The War Against Destiny ( Arcade) 16. 2 on 2 Open Ice Challenge ( Arcade) 17. 2010: The Graphic Action Game (Colecovision) 18. 2020 Super Baseball ( Arcade, SNES) 19. 21-Emon (TG16) 20. 3 Choume no Tama: Tama and Friends: 3 Choume Obake Panic!! (GB) 21. 3 Count Bout ( Arcade) 22. 3 Ninjas Kick Back (SNES, Genesis, Sega CD) 23. 3-D Tic-Tac-Toe (Atari 2600) 24. 3-D Ultra Pinball: Thrillride (GBC) 25. 3-D WorldRunner (NES) 26. 3D Asteroids (Atari 7800) 27.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Casual Gaming?
    CHAPTER ONE What Is Casual Gaming? Over the past several years, the term “ casual game ” has been bandied about quite a bit. It gets used to describe so many different types of games that the definition has become rather blurred. But if we look at all of the ways that “ casual ” gets used, we can begin to tease out common elements that inform the design of these games: ● Rules and goals must be clear. ● Players need to be able to quickly reach proficiency. ● Casual game play adapts to a player’s life and schedule. ● Game concepts borrow familiar content and themes from life. While all game design should take these issues into account, these elements are of particular importance if you want to reach a broad audience beyond traditional gamers. This book will look at elements that a wide array of casual games share and draw out common lessons for approaching game design. Hopefully it will be of use not just to casual game designers, but to all game designers and even general experience designers as well. Everywhere you look these days, you see impact of casual games. More than 200 million people play casual games on the Internet, according to the Casual Games Association. This audience generated revenues in excess of $2.25 billion in 2007. 1 This may seem meager compared to the $41 billion posted by the entire game indus- try worldwide,2 but casual games currently rank as one of the fastest growing sec- tors of the game industry. As growth in the rest of the industry stagnated, the casual downloadable market barreled ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Game Development Does Not Require Large Up-Front Capital Costs
    2. The recent disruption to the Irish economy may provide a boon to this sector. Casual game development does not require large up-front capital costs. It is, however, affected by the cost of office space and relevant talent. The broad reduction in the Irish cost base will likely improve our competitiveness in this field. 3. Ireland already has a flourishing technology sector which can provide broad support to the games industry. The key platforms, such as Facebook, have large Dublin offices. Infrastructure, in the form of server farms provided by companies such as Amazon, is available locally. These businesses are, in turn, supported by a wealth of quality graduates and research being produced by third-level Game On! institutions. The universities have long realised the importance of this sector. Trinity College has arguably Philip Nolan (pic), Partner at Mason Hayes & Curran and Oisin Tobin, Mason Hayes & Curran led the way with a dedicated MSc in Interactive Entertainment Technology. At Mason Hayes & Curran, we expect this The games industry can be broadly to facilitate multiplayer gaming across The game sector is one of sector to continue to develop and to go segmented into two distinct markets. the internet, was acquired by Activision from strength to strength. In this regard, the unsung success stories One market is for “hardcore” games. Blizzard in 2007 and now provides the recent Forfás report “The Games These are the big ticket, graphics- intense the technological backbone to the of the Irish economy. Sector in Ireland: An Action Plan for and expensive products which are multiplayer aspect of the record- Growth” provides much food for thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Master List of Games This Is a List of Every Game on a Fully Loaded SKG Retro Box, and Which System(S) They Appear On
    Master List of Games This is a list of every game on a fully loaded SKG Retro Box, and which system(s) they appear on. Keep in mind that the same game on different systems may be vastly different in graphics and game play. In rare cases, such as Aladdin for the Sega Genesis and Super Nintendo, it may be a completely different game. System Abbreviations: • GB = Game Boy • GBC = Game Boy Color • GBA = Game Boy Advance • GG = Sega Game Gear • N64 = Nintendo 64 • NES = Nintendo Entertainment System • SMS = Sega Master System • SNES = Super Nintendo • TG16 = TurboGrafx16 1. '88 Games (Arcade) 2. 007: Everything or Nothing (GBA) 3. 007: NightFire (GBA) 4. 007: The World Is Not Enough (N64, GBC) 5. 10 Pin Bowling (GBC) 6. 10-Yard Fight (NES) 7. 102 Dalmatians - Puppies to the Rescue (GBC) 8. 1080° Snowboarding (N64) 9. 1941: Counter Attack (TG16, Arcade) 10. 1942 (NES, Arcade, GBC) 11. 1942 (Revision B) (Arcade) 12. 1943 Kai: Midway Kaisen (Japan) (Arcade) 13. 1943: Kai (TG16) 14. 1943: The Battle of Midway (NES, Arcade) 15. 1944: The Loop Master (Arcade) 16. 1999: Hore, Mitakotoka! Seikimatsu (NES) 17. 19XX: The War Against Destiny (Arcade) 18. 2 on 2 Open Ice Challenge (Arcade) 19. 2010: The Graphic Action Game (Colecovision) 20. 2020 Super Baseball (SNES, Arcade) 21. 21-Emon (TG16) 22. 3 Choume no Tama: Tama and Friends: 3 Choume Obake Panic!! (GB) 23. 3 Count Bout (Arcade) 24. 3 Ninjas Kick Back (SNES, Genesis, Sega CD) 25. 3-D Tic-Tac-Toe (Atari 2600) 26. 3-D Ultra Pinball: Thrillride (GBC) 27.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 ELECTRONIC ARTS Q4 FY16 PREPARED COMMENTS May 10
    ELECTRONIC ARTS Q4 FY16 PREPARED COMMENTS May 10, 2016 Chris: Thank you. Welcome to EA’s fiscal 2016 fourth quarter earnings call. With me on the call today are Andrew Wilson, our CEO, and Blake Jorgensen, our CFO. Please note that our SEC filings and our earnings release are available at ir.ea.com. In addition, we have posted earnings slides to accompany our prepared remarks. After the call, we will post our prepared remarks, an audio replay of this call, and a transcript. A couple of quick notes on our calendar: we plan to deliver our next earnings report on Tuesday, August 2. And our press conference at EA PLAY will take place at 1pm Pacific Time on Sunday, June 12. Coming up next week, on Tuesday, May 17, is our Investor Day – if you haven’t registered already, please contact me so that we can send you an invitation. This presentation and our comments include forward-looking statements regarding future events and the future financial performance of the Company. Actual events and results may differ materially from our expectations. We refer you to our most recent Form 10-Q for a discussion of risks that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed today. Electronic Arts makes these statements as of May 10, 2016 and disclaims any duty to update them. During this call unless otherwise stated, the financial metrics will be presented on a non-GAAP basis. Our earnings release and the earnings slides provide a reconciliation of our GAAP to non-GAAP measures. These non-GAAP measures are not intended to be considered in isolation from, as a substitute for, or superior to our GAAP results.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactive Entertainment and Internet Segments Are Converging, Entertainment Shifting the Landscape of the Traditional Video Game Market
    North America TMT Internet FITT Research Company Company 31 October 2010 Fundamental, Industry, Thematic, Thought Leading Deutsche Bank’s Research Product Interactive Committee has deemed this work F.I.T.T. for investors seeking differentiated ideas. The Interactive Entertainment and Internet segments are converging, Entertainment shifting the landscape of the traditional video game market. Digital, social and mobile gaming are emerging as the next major drivers of the interactive gaming space in the US over the next several years. The social and massively multi- player segments should also offer an attractive opportunity for monetization of Extending Game Play to the virtual goods, one of the fastest-growing segments in the space. Masses... beyond the console Fundamental: Growth Driven by Penetration of the Long Tail Global Markets Research Industry: We see Nearly a $30bn US Market Opportunity by 2014 Thematic: Digital, Social and Mobile are Key Emerging Themes Thought Leading: Adoption, Engagement, and Monetization Phases We Favor Activision Blizzard for Digital Position and Google for its Android Platform for Mobile Gaming Jeetil Patel Herman Leung Matt Chesler, CFA Research Analyst Research Analyst Research Analyst (+1) 415 617-4223 (+1) 415 617-3246 (+1) 212 250-6170 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. All prices are those current at the end of the previous trading session unless otherwise indicated. Prices are sourced from local exchanges via Reuters, Bloomberg and other vendors. Data is sourced from Deutsche Bank and subject companies. Deutsche Bank does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports.
    [Show full text]
  • ELECTRONIC ARTS Q3 FY14 PREPARED COMMENTS January 28, 2014
    ELECTRONIC ARTS Q3 FY14 PREPARED COMMENTS January 28, 2014 ROB: Thank you. Welcome to EA’s fiscal 2014 third quarter earnings call. With me on the call today are Andrew Wilson, our CEO, and Blake Jorgensen, our CFO. Peter Moore, our COO, and Patrick Söderlund, our EVP of EA Studios, will be joining us for the Q&A portion of the call. Please note that our SEC filings and our earnings release are available at ir.ea.com. In addition, we have posted earnings slides to accompany our prepared remarks. Lastly, after the call, we will post our prepared remarks, an audio replay of this call, and a transcript. This presentation and our comments include forward-looking statements regarding future events and the future financial performance of the Company. Actual events and results may differ materially from our expectations. We refer you to our most recent Form 10-Q for a discussion of risks that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed today. Electronic Arts makes these statements as of January 28, 2014 and disclaims any duty to update them. During this call unless otherwise stated, the financial metrics will be presented on a non-GAAP basis. Our earnings release and the earnings slides provide a reconciliation of our GAAP to non-GAAP measures. These non-GAAP measures are not intended to be considered in isolation from, as a substitute for, or superior to our GAAP results. We encourage investors to consider all measures before making an investment decision. All comparisons made in the course of this call are against the same period in the prior year unless otherwise stated.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Arts, Inc. (EA) Q3 2014 Earnings Call
    Electronic Arts, Inc. EA Q3 2014 Earnings Call Jan. 28, 2014 Company▲ Ticker▲ Event Type▲ Date▲ PARTICIPANTS Corporate Participants Rob Sison – Vice President-Investor Relations, Electronic Arts, Inc. Andrew Wilson – Chief Executive Officer & Director, Electronic Arts, Inc. Blake J. Jorgensen – Chief Financial Officer & Executive Vice President, Electronic Arts, Inc. Peter Robert Moore – Chief Operating Officer, Electronic Arts, Inc. Patrick Söderlund – Executive Vice President-EA Games Label, Electronic Arts, Inc. Other Participants Colin A. Sebastian – Analyst, Robert W. Baird & Co. Equity Capital Markets Edward S. Williams – Analyst, BMO Capital Markets (United States) Doug L. Creutz – Analyst, Cowen & Co. LLC Arvind Bhatia – Analyst, Sterne, Agee & Leach, Inc. Michael J. Olson – Analyst, Piper Jaffray, Inc. James L. Hardiman – Analyst, Longbow Research LLC Brian J. Pitz – Analyst, Jefferies LLC Drew E. Crum – Analyst, Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc. Stephen D. Ju – Analyst, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC (Broker) Ryan Gee – Analyst, Bank of America Merrill Lynch Mike Hickey – Analyst, The Benchmark Co. LLC Ben Schachter – Analyst, Macquarie Capital (USA), Inc. Neil A. Doshi – Analyst, CRT Capital Group LLC MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION SECTION Operator: Welcome, and thank you for standing by. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] Today’s conference is being recorded. If you have any objections, you may disconnect at this time. Now, I’ll turn the meeting over to Mr. Rob Sison, Vice President of Investor Relations. You may begin. Rob Sison, Vice President-Investor Relations Thank you. Welcome to EA’s Fiscal 2014 Third Quarter Earnings Call. With me on the call today are Andrew Wilson, our CEO; and Blake Jorgensen, our CFO.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent N0.: US 8,128,476 B1 Sidhu Et A]
    USOO8128476B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent N0.: US 8,128,476 B1 Sidhu et a]. (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 6, 2012 (54) ELECTRONIC GAME, SUCH ASA (56) References Cited COMPUTER GAME INVOLVING REMOVING PEGS U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS 7,169,044 B2* l/2007 Baerlocher et al. ........... .. 463/20 (75) Inventors: Sukhbir Sidhu, Seattle, WA (US); Brian Rothstein, Seattle, WA (US); Eric Tams, (Continued) Seattle, WA (US) OTHER PUBLICATIONS (73) Assignee: PopCap Games, Inc., Seattle, WA (US) “Kat i Damacy,” Sep‘ 22, 2004, Namco, manual, ( * ) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this (Continued) patent is extended or adjusted under 35 U.S.C. 154(b) by 923 days. Primary Examiner * Dmitry Suhol (21) Appl. N0.: 12/024,604 Assistant Examiner * KevinY Kim _ (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm * Perkins Coie LLP (22) Flled: Feb. 1, 2008 (Under 37 CFR 1.47) (57) ABSTRACT Related US. Application Data _ _ Peggle 1s a game that balances sklll and luck. The Peggle (60) PrOViSional application NO- 60/888,063, ?led on Feb- board is made up of different types of pegs, some of Which the 2, 2007- player must clear. The player begins a turn by aiming a ball at the pegs. When the player releases the ball, the ball travels (51) Int“ Cl“ through the pegs, contacting some and eventually falling to A63F 9/24 (200601) the bottom of the board. The ball may bounce off many pegs, A63F 13/00 (200601) and those pegs that the ball contacts are removed. A score is G06F 1 7/00 (200601) calculated based on the number and types of pegs hit during a G06F 19/00 (2006.01) turn.
    [Show full text]