DOCSLIB.ORG

Constantin Brancusi Press Highlights

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Constantin Brancusi Press Highlights CONSTANTIN BRANCUSI PRESS HIGHLIGHTS 509 West 27th Street New York NY 10001 + 1 212 563 4474 kasmingallery.com Brancusi & Duchamp: the Art of Dialogue Mary Ann Caws October 3, 2018 It would be difficult to come up with a more challenging duo than this one. The exhibition is packed with sculptures, photographs, objects, films, little magazines—nothing is lacking—but we could just stop where it starts: with those two gorgeous faces of Brancusi and Duchamp by Man Ray, from 1920 and 1934, preceded by a sweater-clad Brancusi rarely seen. Here we are given the proper spin to this remarkable dialogue. I will hone in on what most pulled me in: the extraordinary Recording of Puns by Rrose Sélavy, originally recorded in 1950 and copied in 1967 – 1968. To watch the hypnotizing spirals of Anemic Cinema, accompanied 509 West 27th Street New York NY 10001 + 1 212 563 4474 kasmingallery.com by the camera used to make it in 1920(!), or the Rotoreliefs and optical disks from 1930 and 1935 spinning in the present, while we hear the puns said aloud by Duchamp—as his alter ego (ega!) Rrose Sélavy—adds a whole other layer of meaning and experience. Of course, as the surrealists always said, “words are not playing, they are making love” and this sounding, alongside the Brancusi films of the early 1930s, was something literally unheard before. But then there are Brancusi’s photographs of the external world such as the Temple of the Crocodile and the Endless Column at Voulangis that seems somehow to end in the sky, or his interior world—his studio, his and Duchamp’s friend Henri-Pierre Roché, with his face thrice averted, and—my favorite—Brancusi’s self- portrait in his studio of 1922. All are revelations rather than representations, as were his portraits of James Joyce in 1929 and one of an anonymous woman in 1920, whose face (so resembling Brancusi’s sculpted faces like that of Mlle Pogany) is inserted in the upsweep of her dress, all in green and red. But even more startlingly, another portrait from 1917, has just the face of Duchamp as Rrose Sélavy with that hat and those hands by Man Ray—ah, how we recognize her! But nothing surpasses Brancusi’s film of the Inauguration of the Large Fireplaceof 1932, with Duchamp, Mary Reynolds, Vera Moore and Brancusi seated around a table celebrating. What a conversation is this! And if that is about hearing and seeing in the round, the ultimate transparency is surely Hans Schiff’s print of Duchamp’s Large Glass with Brancusi’s Leda seen through it (1949, printed in 1956 – 7). Dialogues like this— rare and unprecedented—are about speaking and seeing and making art through and around. 509 West 27th Street New York NY 10001 + 1 212 563 4474 kasmingallery.com Reading into The Artistic Dialogue Between Brancusi and Duchamp Balasz Takac September 9, 2018 Featured image: Constantin Brancusi – Le Nouveau-Né (The Newborn I), 1920. Polished bronze, 5 7/8 x 8 3/8 x 5 7/8 inches; 15 x 21 x 15 cm. Edition of 8, cast by Susse Fondeur, Paris in 2003. © Succession Brancusi (2018) Artist Rights Society (ARS), New York, NY/ADAGP, Paris. All images courtesy Kasmin Gallery. The proponents of the early avant-garde were very well connected on the global scale and their art networks functioned the same as they do now, regardless of the technological advancements. Naturally, the communication was much easier if they belonged to the same scene and were open for collaboration. There are plenty of examples, and one of them is the relation between Constantin Brancusi and Marcel Duchamp, two of the most iconic art figures of the twentieth century. The upcoming exhibition at Paul Kasmin Gallery titled Brancusi & Duchamp: The Art of Dialogue tends to reveal the effects of mutual support and creative exchange. 509 West 27th Street New York NY 10001 + 1 212 563 4474 kasmingallery.com Left: Marcel Duchamp – Untitled, 1968. Collage and pencil on paper, 6 5/8 x 8 inches; 16.8 x 20.3 cm. © Association Marcel Duchamp / ADAGP, Paris / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York 2018. Courtesy of Francis M. Naumann Fine Art, New York / Right: Marcel Duchamp – Place Card for Henri-Pierre Roché, 28 July 1917, pen and ink on paper (recto and verso). 8 7/8 x 5 3/4 inches; 22.5 x 14.6 cm. © Association Marcel Duchamp / ADAGP, Paris / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York 2018. Courtesy of Francis M. Naumann Fine Art, New York. The Story of Two Artists Constantin Brancusi and Marcel Duchamp befriended in the 1910s. Around 1913, Duchamp made a huge breakthrough – he abandoned painting and embarked on a completely experimental journey; that is when he invented the ready-made, by appropriating everyday object and pronouncing it a work of art. Aside from the conceptual differences they remained friends for decades and helped each other much. Together with Duchamp, Brancusi installed his first two major solo exhibitions in the United States in 1926–27 and in 1933–34. Along with their mutual friend Henri-Pierre Roché, Duchamp acted as Brancusi’s mediator since he lacked a dealer. Certain similarities can be found in work of both artists from photography and moving pictures, over eroticism and gender play, the objectness of things. They were both innovators in a constant search for new possibilities and solutions which penetrated traditional understanding of art. 509 West 27th Street New York NY 10001 + 1 212 563 4474 kasmingallery.com Marcel Duchamp – Four Chess Pieces (King, Queen, and Two Pawns) for Wall-Mounted Chessboard, ca. 1930. Red colored paper, glued to cardboard disks, 12 x 13 inches; 30.5 x 33 cm, framed.© Association Marcel Duchamp / ADAGP, Paris / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York 2018. Courtesy of Francis M. Naumann Fine Art, New York. A Fine Selection Of Works and Objects A number of over eighty works encompassing objects, photographs, sculptures, films and drawings loaned from various public and private collections, accompanied by rarely exhibited archival documentation will be on display. One lifetime sculpture and four posthumous casts in bronze by Brancusi will be shown together with photographic prints by his most iconic creations, such as Princess X or Leda. Duchamp’s iconic works In Advance of the Broken Arm (1915/1964), With Hidden Noise (1916/1964), and L.H.O.O.Q. (1919/1964) will be shown as well as his early fauvist painting Nude with Black Stockings (1910), Rotoreliefs (Optical Disks) (1935), the Box in a Valise (1935–41), Female Fig Leaf (1950/1951). The chess treatise Opposition and Sister Squares Are Reconciled (1932), which he designed in collaboration with Brancusi will be displayed. 509 West 27th Street New York NY 10001 + 1 212 563 4474 kasmingallery.com Left: Constantin Brancusi – Jeune Fille sophistiquée (Portrait de Nancy Cunard), 1928. Polished bronze, 21 5/8 x 5 7/8 x 8 5/8 inches; 54.9 x 14.9 x 21.9 cm. Edition 5, cast by Susse Fondeur, Paris in 2013. © Succession Brancusi (2018) Artist Rights Society (ARS), New York, NY/ADAGP, Paris / Right: Constantin Brancusi – Princess X, 1916. Polished bronze, 22 1/4 x 16 1/2 x 9 1/2 inches; 56.5 x 41.9 x 24.1 cm. Edition of 8, cast by Susse Fondeur, Paris in 2016. © Succession Brancusi (2018) Artist Rights Society (ARS), New York, NY/ADAGP, Paris This exhibition is significant since it will be the first survey entirely focused on the communication of the two art figures in any American museum or gallery. It should put a new light and enrich our knowledge on this important chapter of art history. Brancusi & Duchamp: The Art of Dialogue is curated by art historian Paul B. Franklin and it will open at Paul Kasmin Gallery in New York from 20 September until 22 December 2018. 509 West 27th Street New York NY 10001 + 1 212 563 4474 kasmingallery.com At Paul Kasmin, Minimalism Does a Comic Turn 05-22-15 Blake Gopnik THE DAILY PIC (#1315): The show called “Brancusi: Pioneer of American Minimalism", at Paul Kasmin Gallery in New York, is gorgeous and uplifting. (The exhibition has earned the gallery its third Daily Pic in a row.) Superb works by Brancusi himself, but also by Carl Andre, Donald Judd and a few of their pals, all look stunning in the gallery's light-filled space. For the first time that I've noticed, they also all look … funny. The show somehow brings out a comic side that that I've never noticed in minimalism, but that makes the movement seem more impressive and varied than ever. The fun begins with a Brancusi called Jeune fille sophistiquée (shown below) a piece that I can't say I've seen in the flesh before now. Conceived in 1928, it has a blobby look that mirrors the whimsy in Betty Boop, born just a couple of years later. That fun is catching: you turn the corner and take in a Brancusi Coq that now seems more naughty and tumescent than ever. March 13 - 18, 2015 ART BASEL IN HONG KONG DAILY EDITON 15 - 17 MARCH 2015 ArtRx NYC 05-05-15 Jillian Steinhauer Atelier Brancusi re-created in Paris (photo by Kemy Lin) Brancusi: Pioneer of American Minimalism When: Opens Thursday, May 7 Where: Paul Kasmin Gallery (515 West 27th Street, Chelsea, Manhattan) In 1926, perplexed American customs officials came across a thin, gold sculpture, purportedly of a bird, that had little resemblance to any avian creature. They classified it under “Kitchen Utensils and Hospital Supplies” and levied a 40% tariff against the work’s value.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Film Film Film Film
    Annette Michelson’s contribution to art and film criticism over the last three decades has been un- paralleled. This volume honors Michelson’s unique C AMERA OBSCURA, CAMERA LUCIDA ALLEN AND TURVEY [EDS.] LUCIDA CAMERA OBSCURA, AMERA legacy with original essays by some of the many film FILM FILM scholars influenced by her work. Some continue her efforts to develop historical and theoretical frame- CULTURE CULTURE works for understanding modernist art, while others IN TRANSITION IN TRANSITION practice her form of interdisciplinary scholarship in relation to avant-garde and modernist film. The intro- duction investigates and evaluates Michelson’s work itself. All in some way pay homage to her extraordi- nary contribution and demonstrate its continued cen- trality to the field of art and film criticism. Richard Allen is Associ- ate Professor of Cinema Studies at New York Uni- versity. Malcolm Turvey teaches Film History at Sarah Lawrence College. They recently collaborated in editing Wittgenstein, Theory and the Arts (Lon- don: Routledge, 2001). CAMERA OBSCURA CAMERA LUCIDA ISBN 90-5356-494-2 Essays in Honor of Annette Michelson EDITED BY RICHARD ALLEN 9 789053 564943 MALCOLM TURVEY Amsterdam University Press Amsterdam University Press WWW.AUP.NL Camera Obscura, Camera Lucida Camera Obscura, Camera Lucida: Essays in Honor of Annette Michelson Edited by Richard Allen and Malcolm Turvey Amsterdam University Press Front cover illustration: 2001: A Space Odyssey. Courtesy of Photofest Cover design: Kok Korpershoek, Amsterdam Lay-out: japes, Amsterdam isbn 90 5356 494 2 (paperback) nur 652 © Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, 2003 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, me- chanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permis- sion of both the copyright owner and the author of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • In Duchamp's Shadow : Dadaist in the City of Machines
    d IN DUCHAMP’S SHADOW: Dadaist in the City of Machines John Cohassey In Detroit’s Scarab Club, a charming brick 1920s arts and crafts structure is Marcel Duchamp’s signature—thirteen small cryptic letters on a wooden ceiling beam. This talismanic auto­ graph stirred my interest in finding out why and when Duchamp added his name to the collection of signatures in the club’s lounge. I was aware that Duchamp came to Detroit in November 1961 to speak at the Detroit Institute of Arts and re­ ceive an honorary degree from Wayne State University. This being the only information about Duchamp having visited De­ troit of which I knew, I set out to find a link between the Scarab Club signature and his coming to Detroit in 1961. We may never know why Duchamp—who never spoke fondly of history, especially its art movements and “isms” and rejected all facets of aesthetic commercialism—accepted an honorary degree from an urban university so far from the powerful centers of the art world. But for an artist fascinated by the machine and mechanical drawings, Detroit may have been a fitting place for such an honor. At the time of Duchamp’s visit, the seventy­four­year­old artist had emerged from a relatively isolated life in New York City to appear on television and at museum and gallery events. After nearly a half century of bachelorhood (he was married briefly in 1927), Duchamp married again in 1955 and became an American citizen. Unlike many other influential artists, he 11 avoided a self­destructive path.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Animation, Conceptual Art, and Don Delillo's Underworld
    Abstract Animation, Conceptual Art, and Don Delillo’s Underworld: collectibles and non-collectibles in art Takashi WAKUI “These materials have no esthetic interest. They are discolored and crum- bling. Old paper, that’s all it is. My customers come here largely for the clutter and mess. It’s a history they’re part of.” (Don Delillo, Underworld, p.322) Delillo’s Underworld: Don Delillo is one of the most celebrated contemporary American novelists. Of his numerous works Underworld (1997) is arguably his most ambitious. The title “underworld” is a metaphor for many things that appear in the novel, among them, the underground nuclear waste, the graffiti artist who lives and works in the NY subway system, the mafia underworld that is alleged (by one of the main charac- ters) to have infiltrated the waste management industry, the desolate urban land- scape of the Bronx with its population of underclass dwellers, and the part of the Cold War history that is still classified and therefore only surfaces as rumors. In other words, the “underworld” stands for things hidden, buried underground either because they are disagreeable, filthy, dangerous or criminal but nevertheless un- avoidable in every society. The novel is also about the capitalist economy that works as a lubricant to turn such waste into money. One of the main characters, Nick Shay, is an executive of a waste management company. Waste management is a growth industry in today’s capitalist world. In the capitalist economy waste is a commodity like anything else. (The diversified Bill Gates is said to have a stake in one major waste management company.
    [Show full text]
  • Marcel Duchamp
    Marcel Duchamp/ the Mary Sisler collection/ 78 works 1904-1963 sponsored by the Queen Elizabeth SecondArts Council of NewZealand gG<- Auckland [Wellington jChristchurch Acknowledgements It is inadvisable to shoot in the dark — but it sometimes seems to bring results I We are glad it did in this case. A letter to Cordier 6r Ekstrom Gallery, New York, in September 1965, where a Marcel Duchamp retrospective exhibition had just been presented, triggered a chain of events leading to the landing of a Marcel Duchamp exhibition in Auckland in April 1967, to commence a New Zealand tour —then to Australia and possibly Japan. We would like to thank Mrs Mary Sisler of New York who has generously made her collection available; Mr Alan Solomon, Director, The Exhibition of American Art at Montreal; The Arts Council of Great Britain, from whose comprehensive catalogue 'The almost complete works of Marcel Duchamp' the present catalogue has been compiled and who kindly supplied photographs for reproduction; The Queen Elizabeth II The Second Arts Council of New Zealand under whose sponsorship the exhibition is being toured in New Zealand. G. C. Docking City of Auckland Art Gallery April 1967 Marcel Duchamp 1887 Born 28 July near Blainville, France. Duchamp's grandfather was a painter; his elder brothers, Jacques Villon and Raymond Duchamp-Villon, and younger sister, Suzanne, became artists 1902 Begins painting. Landscape at Blainville known as his first work (not included in the exhibition). 1904 Graduates from the Ecole Bossuet, the lycee in Rouen. Joins his elder brothers in Paris, where he studies painting at the Academie Julian until July 1905.
    [Show full text]
  • Duchamp Syllabus
    PROF. SVEN SPIEKER WINTER 2008 THEORIES OF THE MODERN: MARCEL DUCHAMP TENTATIVE SYLLABUS AND SCHEDULE 1. Books and Seminar Reader David Joselit, Infinite Regress (UCen/UCSB Bookstore) Dawn Ades, Marcel Duchamp (UCEn/UCSB Bookstore) Marcel Duchamp, Writings (UCen/UCSB Bookstore) Class Reader (Grafikart, Isla Vista) The latest biography of Duchamp is the one by Calvin Tomkins. It will be on reserve at the Arts Library. 2. Requirements --Research paper -Up to four in-class interventions, focusing on one work by Duchamp + a reading of your choice. Interventions are strictly circumscribed: no handouts beyond one page (if any); absolutely no more than ten minutes; end with a question that leads into a group discussion. Team-interventions are possible. The point here is not to only to represent critical models already existent but also to develop possible alternatives to them. --Produce an annotated bibliography of the books on reserve at the Arts Library. This is due in week 4. Readings are for orientation, and may be adjusted as we move along. I suggest you use Ades’ book as a basic tool for navigation, and then follow your instincts in selecting further readings from the class reader; the books on reserve at the Arts Library (see handout); and the books purchased for this class (see list above). We will not march through assigned texts one by one. Rather, I expect an informed discussion that works with a kaleidoscope of different sources. The works by Duchamp discussed each session are by and large those mentioned in the respective chapters
    [Show full text]
  • Marcel Duchamp's the Large Glass As Negation of Women
    MARCEL DUCHAMP'S THE LARGE GLASS AS NEGATION OF WOMEN APPROVED: aj or of essor ' lJ <r rofesc6r Chairman of the Department of Art Dean of the Graduate School 3 Q ,Ya$ MARCEL DUCHAMP'S THE LARGE GLASS AS "NEGATION OF WOMEN" THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Karen M. Olvera, B.A., M.S.Ed. Denton, Texas August 1986 Olvera, Karen M., Marcel Duchamp's The Large Glass as "Negation of Women." Master of Arts (Art History), August 1986, 127 pp., 21 illustrations, bibliography, 88 titles. Marcel Duchamp stated in an interview in 1966 that his magnum opus, The Bride Stripped Bare by Her Bachelors, Even (The Large Glass) was, "above all, a negation of women." The purpose of this study was to determine whether The Large Glass was a negation of women for Duchamp. The thesis is composed of five chapters. Chapter I is the introduction to the thesis. Chapter II includes a synopsis of the major interpretations of The Large Glass. Duchamp's statements in regard to The Large Glass are also included in Chapter II. Chapter III explains how The Large Glass works through the use of Duchamp's notes. Chapter IV investigates Duchamp's negation of women statement in several ways. His personal relationships with relatives including his wives and other women, and his early paintings of women were examined. His idea of indifference was seen within the context of the Dandy and his alter ego, Rrose Selavy as a Femme Fatale.
    [Show full text]
  • Man Ray's Le Retour À La Raison (1923), Marcel Duchamp's Anémic
    Sticking to the “Factual.” Man Ray’s Le Retour à la raison (1923), Marcel Duchamp’s Anémic cinéma (1924–26) and Peter Tscherkassky’s Dream Work (2001)1 Gabriele Jutz2 In his seminal essay “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Re- production,” Walter Benjamin drew an analogy between the Dadaist artwork and the film medium. In terms of their reception, both coun- teract contemplative immersion and aim at the destruction of the aura. What Benjamin was referring to, was, on the one hand, those often offensive Dadaist activities that were intended to outrage the public, and, on the other, film’s ability to “periodically assail the spectator” (Benjamin 1973, 238), due to the constant and sudden change of shots. However, the shock effect the Dadaists attempted to create in a moral sense could be technically satisfied only by the film projection, which, according to Benjamin, invites tactile viewing. In other words, what applies to the Dadaist work of art, which, as Ben- jamin put it, “became an instrument of ballistics” and “hit the spectator like a bullet” (Benjamin 1973, 238), seems to be even more true for film, which owed its tactile quality no longer to moral effects but to the technical structure of its very apparatus. Benjamin con- cludes: “the film has taken the physical shock effect out of the wrappers in which Dadaism had, as it were, kept it inside the moral shock effect” (Benjamin 1973, 238). In view of this structural analogy between the Dadaist work of art and the film projection—strictly speaking between their respec- tive receptions—film would seem to be the quintessential Dada artifact.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis-And-Resynthesis-Of-Anemic
    440 creative period, Duchamp was content to let others develop therefore, the revolving disks produced a three- to the themes he had originated; his pervasive influence dimensional effect. This anticipated the spiral theme that was crucial to the development of Surrealism, Dada, and would later appear in Rotary Demisphere (1925) and in the Pop Art. Duchamp became an American citizen in 1955 film Anémic Cinéma (1925-1926). The disks in Disks and at the end of his life Duchamp became an idol of the Bearing Spirals (1923) were preliminary studies for new generation of avant-garde American artists. He died in Duchamp's (second) attempt to produce a three- Neuilly sur Seine, Paris on October 1, 1968. All in all, dimensional film. This time he just filmed rotating disks, Duchamp could be considered the bridge between early alternating nineteen Op-Art-Optical Disks, based on the modern movements, such as Futurism and Cubism, to earlier Disks Bearing Spirals. Nine of these disks were Dada and Surrealism [4]. inscribed by puns, white letters pasted on black cardboard disks and that denotes his interest in visual phenomena, 3. ANÉMIC CINÉMA too. Anémic Cinéma alternates shots of moving spirals and shots of texts mounted on disks in slight relief. The texts, The spinning wheel is a recurring theme/movement in which we read from the outside inwards, involve complex Duchamp's works: Bicycle Wheel (1913), Nude word play that may suggest to us a set of erotic scenarios, Descending a Staircase, N. 2 (1912) and his Rotorelief creating an almost hypnotic effect. On one level, (1935).
    [Show full text]
  • Marcel Duchamp's Diagrammatics of Love, Sex and Erotics
    JOURNAL > SITE 2. DARK ROOM: SOMATIC REASON AND SYNTHETIC EROS | 2019 Marcel Duchamp’s Diagrammatics of Love, Sex and Erotics Matthew Poole Not to put too fine a point on it, almost all of Marcel Duchamp’s artworks from around 1900 onwards are centered around love, sex, and erotics: penetrations of various kinds, rhythmic pulsations, and sexuality and gender relations in respect of sexual activity or sexual longing. It is also well known that many of these works take as their character, at first glance, an almost schoolyard type of humor in this respect—L.H.O.O.Q. (1919) being a prime example.1 However, aside from the often funny or glib smutty façade of some of Duchamp’s works, his engagement with erotics and diagrammatics can be explored to elicit a truly strange, fascinating, and surprising dialectical methodology of rationalizing what in love, sex, and erotics are the most seemingly irrational of human experiences. Duchamp’s works are born of a rare mix of avant-garde transgressive fervor (which has its own erotic charges of desire and violence), patient, highly-skilled and painstaking craftsmanship, and careful, methodical, scientific, and philosophical enquiry into what by contrast appears the least erotic of all methodologies, that is, mathematical geometry. His pieces may, again at first glance, seem very distant from the precision and dry procedurality of the algebra associated with geometrical projections and transformations in calculus, but I would argue that his own unique approach to image and object-making has its foundations in the erotics that he found in mathematical conceptions, projections, and formulations of n-dimensional space, and the penetration of chance into ordered systems.
    [Show full text]
  • LA OBRA Marcel Duchamp Anémic Cinéma, 1926 Cortometraje, Blanco
    LA OBRA Marcel Duchamp Anémic Cinéma, 1926 Cortometraje, blanco y negro. Estados Unidos. Duración: 6’42’’ Anémic Cinéma, de Marcel Duchamp (obra que firmó como Rrose Sélavy, su alter ego) es un cortometraje experimental que combina rotaciones de espirales con versos en francés a modo de paronomasias, recurso fónico que consiste en emplear parónimos (palabras que tienen sonidos semejantes pero significados diferentes) y aliteraciones (repetición de fonemas en una misma frase). El título es un anagrama (Anémic es la palabra Cinéma al revés). Duchamp muestra una serie de poemas circulares construidos en base a juegos fónicos como «Esquivons les ecchymoses des Esquimaux aux mots esquís» (esquivemos las esquimosis de los esquimales con motes exquisitos), versos de Adon Lacroix -esposa de Man Ray- que reflejaban el popular proceso de escritura automática utilizado por los surrealistas. En 1921, Man Ray trabajaba en una de sus primeras obras experimentales, la Rayografía, que se trataba de obtener imágenes abstractas obtenidas de objetos expuestos sobre un papel sensible a la luz y luego revelado. Duchamp utiliza una técnica similar a la de las Rayografías en el plano de la imagen en movimiento. Con Anémic Cinéma, Duchamp explora la capacidad de restar elementos a la imagen en un ejercicio de deconstrucción. Este tipo de ilusiones ópticas se conocieron con el nombre de Rotoreliefs. Un ejemplar poema visual y una forma diferente de usar las herramientas cinematográficas. Duchamp admiraba las obras de Raymond Roussel, y se inspiró en su lenguaje plástico, complicado de comprensión, en el que la trama gira sobre sí misma. Roussel se inspiraba en las palabras homófonas (palabras que se pronuncian de la misma manera pero tienen sentidos diferentes).
    [Show full text]
  • Dada Comes to the Museum of Modern Art
    DADA COMES TO THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART MoMA Installation Is a Dynamic Multimedia Display of Over 400 Works by Nearly 50 Artists from the Influential Avant-Garde Movement Dada June 18–September 11, 2006 The Joan and Preston Robert Tisch Gallery, sixth floor NEW YORK, June 13, 2006—Dada, on view at The Museum of Modern Art from June 18 to September 11, 2006, is the first major museum exhibition in the United States to focus exclusively on Dada, one of the most influential avant-garde movements of the early twentieth century. Responding to the disasters of World War I and to an emerging modern media and machine culture, Dada artists led a creative revolution that both boldly embraced and caustically criticized modernity itself. Pursuing innovative strategies of art making that included abstraction, chance procedures, collage, photomontage, readymades, performances, and media pranks, the Dadaists created an abiding legacy for the century to come. The exhibition features over 400 works in a dynamic multimedia display that includes films, paintings, photographs, printed matter, sound recordings, and objects. Among the nearly 50 artists represented are Hans Arp, Marcel Duchamp, Max Ernst, George Grosz, Raoul Hausmann, John Heartfield, Hannah Höch, Francis Picabia, Man Ray, Hans Richter, Kurt Schwitters, Sophie Taeuber, and Tristan Tzara. This exhibition surveys the many forms of Dada artistic production as developed in Berlin, Cologne, Hannover, New York, Paris, and Zurich, the six principal cities where Dada took hold between 1916 and 1924. It presents an expansive view of Dada, including Zurich’s experiments in radical abstraction, New York’s irreverent readymades and machine portraits, Berlin’s scathing political montages, Cologne’s hallucinatory imagery, Paris’s relentless critiques of painterly traditions, and Kurt Schwitters’s carefully composed recyclings of society’s detritus in Hannover.
    [Show full text]
  • A HISTORY of EXPERIMENTAL FILM and VIDEO from the Canonical Avant-Garde to Contemporary British Practice
    A HISTORY OF EXPERIMENTAL FILM AND VIDEO From the Canonical Avant-Garde to Contemporary British Practice A. L. Rees Publishing First published in 1999 by the British Film Institute 21 Stephen Street, London W1P 2LN The British Film Institute is the UK national agency with responsibility for encouraging the arts of film and television and conserving them in the national interest. Copyright © A. L. Rees 1999 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 0-85170-684-3 (hardback) 0-85170-681-9 (paperback) Cover designed by Toby Cornish Typeset by Fakenham Photosetting Limited, Fakenham, Norfolk Printed in Great Britain by St Edmundsbury Press, Bury St Edmunds Contents Acknowledgments v List of Illustrations v Preface vi Introduction 1 Siting the avant-garde 1 Vision machine 4 Time base i 6 Point of view 7 Modernisms 8 Part One: The canonical avant-garde 15 Origins of the moving image (1780-1880) 15 Photography 17 Art and the avant-garde: summary 1909-20 19 The cubists 21 Primitives and pioneers (1880-1915) 25 Futurists 26 Abstract film 28 The comic burlesque 29 The Art Cinema and its circuit 30 Cine-poems and lyric abstraction 33 Origins of abstract film 35 The absolute film 37 Cubism and poular film 40 Dada and surrealist film 41 The French avant-garde 1924-32 45 Voice and vision in the pre-war avant-garde 47 Transition: into the 1930s and documentary 50 Reviewing the first avant-garde 53 Origins of the post-war avant-garde 56 Underground 62 Two avant-gardes (mark
    [Show full text]