DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Work Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project Work Plan Attachment A Project Work Plan Doc Type: Contract MPCA Use Only Swift #: 103180 CR #: 8623 Project Title: Mississippi River Brainerd Watershed Restoration & Protection Project (Phase 1) 1. Project Summary: Organization: Aitkin SWCD Contractor contact name: Janet Smude Address: 130 Southgate Drive Aitkin, MN 56431 Phone: 218-927-6565 E-mail: [email protected] Partner(s) Local Partner Team (LPT): Organization: Morrison Soil & Water Conservation District Project manager: Helen McLennan Phone: 320-616-2479 E-mail: [email protected] Organization: Crow Wing Soil & Water Conservation District Project manager: Melissa Barrick Phone: 218-828-6197 E-mail: [email protected] Organization: Todd Soil & Water Conservation District Project manager: Shannon Wettstein Phone: 320-732-2644 E-mail: [email protected] Organization: Mississippi River Headwaters Board Project manager: Tim Terrill Phone: 218-824-1189 E-mail: [email protected] MPCA contact(s): MPCA project manager: Bonnie Finnerty Title: Watershed Project Manager Address: 7678 College Road, Suite 105 Baxter, MN 56425 Phone: 218-316-3897 E-mail: [email protected] www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats e-admin9-38 • 12/2/13 Page 1 of 4 Project information Latitude/Longitude: N/A *County: Multiple Counties – Aitkin, Crow Wing, Morrison & Todd Start date: 2/10/2016 End date: 6/30/2019 Total cost: 44,678.00 *Full time equivalents: .35 *Major watershed(s): Statewide Kettle River Miss Rvr – GrandRpds Rainy Rvr – Baudette So Fork Crow River Big Fork River Lac Qui Parle River Miss Rvr –Headwaters Rainy Rvr – Black Rvr Lower St. Croix Rvr Upper Big Sioux Rvr Lake of the Woods Miss Rvr –LaCrescent Rainy Rvr – Rainy Rvr Upper St. Croix Rvr Lower Big Sioux Rvr Lake Superior – North Miss Rvr – Reno Rapid River St. Louis River Blue Earth River Lake Superior – South Miss Rvr – Sartell Red Lake River Red Rvr of the North Tamarac River Bois de Sioux River Le Sueur River Miss Rvr – St. Cloud Upper Red Rvr Thief River Buffalo River Leech Lake River Miss Rvr – Twin Cities Redeye River Two Rivers Cannon River Little Fork River Miss Rvr – Winona Redwood River Upper/Lower Red Lk Cedar River Little Sioux River Miss Rvr – Lake Pepin Rock River Upper Iowa River Chippewa River Long Prairie River Mustinka River Root River Vermillion River Clearwater River Red Rvr of the North Nemadji River Roseau River Upper Wapsipinicon Marsh River River Cloquet River MN Rvr – Yellow No Fork Crow River Rum River Watonwan River Medicine River Cottonwood River MN Rvr – Headwaters Otter Tail River Red Rvr of the North DesMoines Rvr Hdwtrs Sandhill River Crow Wing River MN Rvr – Mankato Pine River Sauk River Lower DesMoines Rvr E Fork DesMoines Rvr Lower MN River Pomme de Terre Rvr Shell Rock River Wild Rice River Red Rvr of the North Miss Rvr – Brainerd Rainy Rvr – Hdwtrs Snake River Winnebago River Grand Marais Creek Zumbro River *Organization type: Federal government Local/Regional government For-profit Private college/university Individual Public college/university Non-profit State government *Project type: Analysis/Interpretation Modeling Research Assessment/Evaluation Monitoring Restoration/Enhancement Demo/Pilot project Planning Technical assistance Education/Outreach/Engagement 2. Statement of Problems, Opportunities, and Existing Conditions The Upper Mississippi River - Brainerd watershed covers 1,079,950 acres (1,687 square miles) in the north central part of the Upper Mississippi River Basin in central Minnesota. The watershed boundary begins in Aitkin County where the river flows through the cities of Aitkin, Brainerd/Baxter, and Little Falls. The watershed encompasses all or parts of Aitkin, Cass, Crow Wing, Morrison, and Todd counties. Almost half of the watershed is forested (42%), while grasslands and shrub wetlands make up 38%, row crops 10%, water 6%, and 4% is urban. The majority of the watershed is within the North Central Hardwood Forest with small sections in the Northern Lakes and Forests ecoregion. The watershed has approximately 2,149 total river miles and contains 212 lakes greater than 10 acres in size. This watershed will begin Intensive Watershed Monitoring in 2016. After 2 years of data collected, there will be a better understanding of which waters are meeting standards and which lakes and streams will need a TMDL. Information gathered throughout this process will be used to develop the TMDLs and WRAP. www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats e-admin9-38 • 12/2/13 Page 2 of 4 3. Goals, Objectives, Tasks, and Subtasks Goal: Phase 1 of this project is primarily geared toward project organizational planning and coordination among project partners, forming a civic engagement team and creating a civic engagement strategic plan. This phase will also be used to gather important data that will be needed to develop the Total Maximum Daily Load reports as well as the Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy with parameter-specific targets that will maintain or improve water quality for the watershed. Objective 1: Overall Project Administration Task A: Fiscal Management and Project Administration Subtask 1: Invoicing & reporting: Prepare and submit monthly or quarterly invoices for payment. Develop and submit semi-annual reports by February 1st and August 1st of each year of the contract and a final report including a final financial report submitted within thirty days of the original or amended end date of the contract. Responsible Party: Aitkin SWCD Objective 1 Timeline: February 10, 2016 – June 30, 2019 Objective 1 Cost: $4,400 Objective 1 Deliverables: (a) Accurate and timely invoices and reports will be sent to the MPCA. Objective 2: Public Participation and Civic Engagement (CE) Task A: Civic Engagement Planning. Subtask 1: Development of a CE sub-team and create a long term plan for CE: The purpose of this activity is to broaden citizen participation in the watershed process through key activities and supplement current efforts with new opportunities for already engaged lake associations and other committed resource partners. The first step will be to create a long term plan for civic engagement that contains various strategies throughout the watershed developed by the civic engagement sub-team. Responsible Parties: Crow Wing SWCD (lead), LPT Task B: Communicating Project Milestones through the Implementation of the Civic Engagement Plan. Subtask 1: Create specific opportunities for citizen involvement through public meetings and workshops. This allows stakeholders, the general public, and targeted audiences to play a more active role in natural resource restoration and protection as well as create an effective communication network for watershed programs and services. Emphasis will be on citizen execution of engagement activities and build upon stronger collaborations and more engaged communities throughout the watershed. Indicators will be developed to track performance/progress of community outreach efforts in meeting knowledge building, communicating, and sharing civic engagement intent. This task will also implement the civic engagement plan, including the development of different sources of media to share our work with the public, (this includes but is not limited to story maps, watershed events, videos, presentations, handouts and surveys identified in Task A). This includes hosting meetings or attending other meetings to dialogue about the watershed project. A subcontractor (TBD) with specific expertise will be utilized to help implement this task. Responsible Parties: Crow Wing SWCD (lead), LPT, Subcontractor (TBD) Objective 2 Timeline: February 10, 2016 – June 30, 2019 Objective 2 Cost: $25,978 www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats e-admin9-38 • 12/2/13 Page 3 of 4 Objective 2 Deliverables: (a) Subcontractor hired and a long-term CE communication plan developed; (b) At least two press releases sharing inspiring stories of our work; (c) Watershed kick-off event held in year one; (d) Public meetings and workshops held; (e) CE sub-team developed; (f) Baseline watershed survey’s conducted ; and (g) Development of communication networks and strategies. Objective 3: Data Gathering & Analysis Task A: Data Gathering and Field Studies. Conduct a variety of assessments including stormwater outfall inventory, subwatershed analysis, riverbank erosion inventory, LiDAR terrain analysis, watershed modeling, additional monitoring and/or other essential investigations will be conducted to better understand the results of intensive watershed monitoring. Exact details and locations of the assessments will be determined based on results of the intensive watershed monitoring and communication with local government units and other state agencies and will help to prioritize implementation and protection efforts within the watershed. Responsible Party: LPT Objective 3 Timeline: February 10, 2016 – June 30, 2019 Objective 3 Cost: $14,300 Objective 3 Deliverables: (a) Data and data analyses that further an understanding of water quality conditions and appropriate strategies for protection and restoration. Pertinent data will follow QAPP guidelines and be submitted to MPCA as well as EQuIS and eLINK. 4. Measurable Outcomes This specific work plan covers the project planning, coordination and establishment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 7050 Minnesota Pollutant Control Agency Waters of the State
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. July 10, 2020 In addition to the criteria provided in this document, EPA has approved site-specific standards for the following waters: Water Parameter(s) Rule Site Specific Standard EPA Approval Date Sauk River Flowage Eutrophication: 7050.0220 subp. 7 TP: < 90 µg/L 2/12/2020 Lakes including Total phosphorus Site-specific Chl-a: < 45 µg/L Horseshoe North, Chl-a modifications of Secchi depth: ≥ 0.8 m East Cedar Island, Secchi depth standards Koetter, Zumwalde, Great Northern, Krays, and Knaus/Park Sauk River Non- Eutrophication: 7050.0220 subp. 7 TP: < 55 µg/L 2/12/2020 flowage lakes Total phosphorus Site-specific Chl-a: < 32 µg/L including Chl-a modifications of Secchi depth: ≥ 1.4 m Horseshoe West, Secchi depth standards Horseshoe South, Cedar Island, and Bolfing Lower Minnesota Selenium 7050.0222 subp. 4 Selenium: 11 µg/L 10/21/2019 River Main Channel, Site-specific starting at modifications of approximately River standards Mile 6, at the discharge for the Seneca Wastewater Treatment Plant, and ending at the confluence of the Minnesota River with the Mississippi River Lower Minnesota Selenium 7050.0222 subp. 4 Selenium: 5.7 µg/L 10/21/2019 River Oxbow and Site-specific Floodplain Lakes modifications of (19-0078-00 and standards 27-0002-00) Lake Zumbro, Eutrophication: 7050.0220 subp.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTROL STRUCTURE LITTLE SIOUX RIVER, IOWA Hydraulic Model Investigation By
    TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 2-762 CONTROL STRUCTURE LITTLE SIOUX RIVER, IOWA Hydraulic Model Investigation by T. E. Murphy February 1967 Sponsored by U. S. Army Engineer District Omaha Conducted by U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station CORPS OF ENGINEERS TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 2-762 CONTROL STRUCTURE LITTLE SIOUX RIVER, IOWA Hydraulic Model Investigation by T. 2. Murphy February 1967 Sponsored by U. S. Army Engineer District Omaha Conducted by U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station CORPS OF ENGINEERS Destroy this report when no longer needed. Do not return it to the originator. The findings in this report are not to be construed as an official Department of the Army position unless so designated by other authorized documents. FOREWORD Model investigation of the control structure for Little Sioux River was authorized by the Office, Chief of Engineers on 25 May 1962, at the request of the U. S. Army Engineer District, Omaha. The study was conducted in the Hydraulics Division of the Waterways Experiment Station during the period July to December 1962. The investigation was conducted under the general supervision of Mr. E. P. Fortson, Jr., Chief of the Hydraulics Division, and Mr. F. R. Brown, Chief of the Hydrodynamics Branch, and under the direct supervision of Mr. T. E. Murphy, Chief of the Structures Section. The engineer in immediate charge of the model was Mr. E. S. Melsheimer, who was assisted by Mr. B. P. Fletcher. This report was prepared by Mr. Murphy. During the course of the investigation Messrs. E. R. Bloomquist, W. M. Linder, H. E.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Sioux River Watershed Biotic Stressor Identification Report
    Little Sioux River Watershed Biotic Stressor Identification Report April 2015 Authors Editing and Graphic Design Paul Marston Sherry Mottonen Jennifer Holstad Contributors/acknowledgements Michael Koschak Kim Laing The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs by Chandra Carter using the Internet to distribute reports and Chuck Regan information to wider audience. Visit our website Mark Hanson for more information. Katherine Pekarek-Scott MPCA reports are printed on 100% post-consumer Colton Cummings recycled content paper manufactured without Tim Larson chlorine or chlorine derivatives. Chessa Frahm Brooke Hacker Jon Lore Cover photo: Clockwise from Top Left: Little Sioux River at site 11MS010; County Ditch 11 at site 11MS078; Cattle around Unnamed Creek at site 11MS067 Project dollars provided by the Clean Water Fund (From the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment) Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North | Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 | www.pca.state.mn.us | 651-296-6300 Toll free 800-657-3864 | TTY 651-282-5332 This report is available in alternative formats upon request, and online at www.pca.state.mn.us Document number: wq-ws5-10230003a Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 2 Monitoring and assessment ...........................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Delineation Percentage
    Lake Superior - North Rainy River - Headwaters Lake Superior - South Vermilion River Nemadji River Cloquet River Pine River Rainy River - Rainy Lake Little Fork River Mississippi River - Headwaters Leech Lake River Upper St. Croix River Root River Big Fork River Mississippi River - Winona Upper/Lower Red Lake Kettle River Mississippi River - Lake Pepin Mississippi River - Grand Rapids Mississippi River - La Crescent Crow Wing River Otter Tail River Mississippi River - Reno Mississippi River - Brainerd Zumbro River Redeye River Upper Big Sioux River Mississippi River - Twin Cities Snake River Des Moines River - Headwaters St. Louis River Rum River Lower Big Sioux River Lower St. Croix River Cottonwood River Minnesota River - Headwaters Cannon River Mississippi River - St. Cloud Long Prairie River Lake of the Woods Lower Rainy North Fork Crow River Mississippi River - Sartell Lac Qui Parle River Buffalo River Wild Rice River Minnesota River - Mankato Sauk River Rock River Redwood River Snake River Chippewa River Watonwan River Clearwater River East Fork Des Moines River Red River of the North - Sandhill River Upper Red River of the North Blue Earth River Red River of the North - Marsh River Roseau River Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River Le Sueur River Little Sioux River Bois de Sioux River Cedar River Lower Minnesota River Pomme de Terre River Red Lake River Lower Des Moines River Upper Iowa River Red River of the North - Tamarac River Shell Rock River Two Rivers Rapid River Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek Mustinka River South Fork Crow River Thief River Winnebago River Upper Wapsipinicon River 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% %Altered %Natural %Impounded %No Definable Channel wq-bsm1-06.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Workplan
    Attachment A Project Workplan Doc Type: Contract MPCA Use Only Swift #: 130553 CR #: 195017-PRO20170001 Project Title: Mississippi River Brainerd WRAPS Phase II 1. Project Summary: Organization: Aitkin County SWCD Contractor contact name: Janet Smude Title: District Technician Address: 130 Southgate Drive Aitkin, MN 56431 Phone: 218-927-6565 E-mail: [email protected] Subcontractor: Organization: RESPEC Project manager: Julie Blackburn Address: 1935 County Road B2 W, Suite 230 Roseville, MN 55113 Phone: 651-305-2272 E-mail: [email protected] Partner(s) Local Partner Team (LPT): Organization: Morrison Soil & Water Conservation District Project manager: Helen McLennan Phone: 320-616-2479 E-mail: [email protected] Organization: Crow Wing Soil & Water Conservation District Project manager: Melissa Barrick Phone: 218-828-6197 E-mail: [email protected] Organization: Todd Soil & Water Conservation District Project manager: Shannon Wettstein Phone: 320-732-2644 E-mail: [email protected] MPCA contact(s): www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • Use your preferred relay service • Available in alternative formats e-admin9-38 • 3/11/16 Page 1 of 6 MPCA project manager: Bonnie Finnerty Title: Watershed Project Manager Address: 7678 College Road Suite 105 Baxter, MN 56425 Phone: 218-316-3897 E-mail: [email protected] Project information Latitude/Longitude: N/A *County: Aitkin, Crow Wing, Morrison, Todd Start date: 09/15/2017 End date: 12/31/2020 Total cost: $249,945.12 *Full time equivalents: 1.50 *Major watershed(s): Statewide Kettle River Miss Rvr – GrandRpds Lower Rainy Rvr So Fork Crow River Big Fork River Lac Qui Parle River Miss Rvr –Headwaters Rainy Lake Lower St.
    [Show full text]
  • A Physio-Chemical Analysis of the Headwaters of the Little Sioux River
    Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science Volume 77 Annual Issue Article 26 1970 A Physio-Chemical Analysis of the Headwaters of the Little Sioux River Milbert H. Krohn Spirit Lake Community School Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©1970 Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias Recommended Citation Krohn, Milbert H. (1970) "A Physio-Chemical Analysis of the Headwaters of the Little Sioux River," Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, 77(1), 172-176. Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol77/iss1/26 This Research is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa Academy of Science at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Krohn: A Physio-Chemical Analysis of the Headwaters of the Little Sioux A Physio-Chemical Analysis of the Headwaters of the Little Sioux River MILBERT H. KROHN 1 Abstract. The magnitude and seasonal variation of 11 selected physio­ chemical characteristics at four collection sites in the headwater region of the Little Sioux River are reported for a 12-month perod from March 1969 through February 1970. Little variation was found between study sites for given sampling times. For several decades the headwaters and adjacent terrestrial areas of the Little Sioux River have been th object of considerable scientific investigation. This study, by students in summer courses at the Iowa Lakeside Laboratory, has resulted in limited informa­ tion through publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Work Plan
    Attachment A Project Work Plan Doc Type: Contract MPCA Use Only Swift #: 89268 CR #: 8070 Project Title: West Fork Des Moines River Major Watershed Project Phase II 1. Project Summary: Organization: Heron Lake Watershed District (HLWD) Contractor Contact Name: Jan Voit Title: District Administrator E-mail: [email protected] Address: PO Box 345 Heron Lake, MN 56137 Phone: 507-793-2462 Fax: 507-822-0921 Subcontractor(s)/Partner(s): Organization: University of Minnesota Extension Project manager: Barb Radke, Leadership and Civic Engagement Address: 863 30th Ave SE Rochester, MN 55904 Phone: 507-995-1631 E-mail: [email protected] and Project manager: Karen Terry, Watershed Education Program Address: 46352 State Highway 329 Morris, MN 56267 Phone: 320-589-1711 E-mail: [email protected] MPCA contact(s): MPCA project manager: Katherine Pekarek-Scott Title: Project Manager Address: 1601 East Highway 12, Suite 1 Willmar, MN 56201 Phone: 320-441-6973 Fax: 320-214-3787 E-mail: [email protected] Project information Latitude/Longitude: 43.556/-94.956 County: Murray, Nobles, Cottonwood, Jackson, Lyon, Pipestone, and Martin Start date: 03/26/2015 End date: 06/30/2018 Total cost: $175,000.00 Full time equivalents: 2.59 www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats e-admin9-38 • 12/2/13 Page 1 of 6 Major watershed(s): Statewide Kettle River Miss Rvr – GrandRpds Rainy Rvr – Baudette So Fork Crow River Big Fork River Lac Qui Parle River Miss Rvr –Headwaters Rainy Rvr – Black Rvr Lower St.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri River Basin Watersheds of Minnesota Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies Report
    Missouri River Basin Watersheds of Minnesota Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies Report January 2018 Missouri River Basin Watersheds GRAPS Report 1 Missouri River Basin Watersheds of Minnesota Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies Report (GRAPS) Minnesota Department of Health Source Water Protection Unit PO Box 64975, St. Paul, MN 55164-0975 (651) 201-4695 [email protected] www.health.state.mn.us Upon request, this material will be made available in an alternative format such as large print, Braille, or audio recording. Printed on recycled paper. The development of the GRAPS report was funded by money received from the Clean Water Fund through the Clean Water, Land, and Legacy Amendment. The goal of the Clean Water Fund is to protect, enhance, and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. Contributors The following agencies dedicated staff time and resources toward the development of the Missouri River Basin Watersheds of Minnesota GRAPS report: ▪ Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) ▪ Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) ▪ Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) ▪ Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) ▪ Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Photo Credit: The photo on the front page is from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and is available at Rock River Watershed (https://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/watersheds/rock-river). Missouri River Basin Watersheds GRAPS Report 2 Summary Groundwater is an important and limited resource in the Missouri watersheds One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) planning boundary.1 Groundwater accounts for over 90 percent of the water that is pumped for agricultural, industrial, drinking, household, and other purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Missionfishin
    #MISSIONFISHIN Bring the whole family trails, playground, lodge and captive elk herd. AUDUBON—Littlefield Lake is popular for all ages. Catch MUSCATINE—Start the day in Muscatine at Discovery FISHING 15- to 20-inch-plus channel cats, 8-inch bluegill and 9- to Park Pond, close to many attractions including the Ten categories of angling fun. 10-inch crappie. Well-manicured shore access. Camping, Muscatine Arboretum and Fuller Park. Excellent bluegill, beach, playground, trails and a live bison display. largemouth bass and channel cat fishing and a chance to catch a trout stocked each spring and fall. Try a chunk CLAY - Easy fishing for bluegill, crappie and lots of of nightcrawler under a bobber for ‘gills or chicken liver catfish at Scharnberg Pond. Great access with a handicap for cats. Catch bass with a variety of lures, from rubber accessible fishing pier and rock jetties. Camping, cabins, worms to topwaters to Beetle Spins. Try flashy spinners beach, playground, hiking trail and paddle boat and canoe for hungry, stocked trout; dough baits, corn or other rental at the county park. scented baits work best after trout settle in. Stroll to Heron Hideaway Pond, with its renovated shoreline, located BY SHANNON HAFNER FRENZY! DAVIS—At Lake Wapello State Park, hit one of Iowa’s behind the Environmental Discovery Center. The center’s premier largemouth waters with good bluegill (6- to large aquarium features local fish species. 8-inch) and improving crappie numbers (up to 11 inches). ast year, we recruited readers to join a mission by taking someone fishing. We called it Mission Miles of lakeside and park trails take you to prairie, woods SAC— Keep kids busy catching lots of largemouth at Black Fishin’ and asked you to share your stories and photos.
    [Show full text]
  • Iowa Chapter Report March 31, 2020 Greg Gelwicks Iowa DNR Fisheries Research
    Iowa Chapter Report March 31, 2020 Greg Gelwicks Iowa DNR Fisheries Research Northeast Iowa Fisheries Management Decorah District Contact: Michael Siepker, 563-382-8324, [email protected] Coldwater Streams Inventory: From 2017 to 2020, the Iowa DNR and Iowa State University partnered to inventory coldwater stream fish communities and survey stream habitat and stream water temperatures in NE Iowa streams. In 2018, about 90 sites were surveyed with about 50 sites sampled in 2019. This data will guide trout management and be used to update Iowa coldwater stream classifications. This project should conclude in June 2020. Genetics of Iowa Brook Trout: The Iowa DNR, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point (UWSP), and USFWS worked to evaluate the genetic diversity and source of Iowa’s wild Brook Trout fisheries. All wild populations were sampled and genetic clips provided to Molecular Conservation Lab at UWSP. The analysis showed 1) there is no reason to believe that South Pine Brook Trout are not native to Iowa, 2) the South Pine population is relatively diverse when compared to other wild populations in MN and WI, 3) some populations restored by stocking South Pine Brook Trout could be used for future broodstock collections, 4) a couple Iowa streams could use additional Brook Trout stockings to increase genetic diversity, 5) some streams have domestic ancestry associated with previous stockings of domestic strain fingerlings, and 5) three streams stocked with Ash Creek (WI) Brook Trout have strong similarity to Ash Creek (WI). Brook Trout management has already been modified as a result of this work; Iowa no longer stocks catchable-sized domestic strain Brook Trout.
    [Show full text]
  • Generalized Skew Coefficients for Flood-Frequency Analysis in Minnesota
    Generalized Skew Coefficients for Flood-Frequency Analysis in Minnesota By D.L. Lorenz U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 97-4089 Prepared in cooperation with the Minnesota Department of Transportation Mounds View, Minnesota 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bruce Babbitt, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 2280 Woodale Drive Box 25286 Mounds View, MN 55112 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Contents Abstract........................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Methods.....................................................................................................................................................^ 1 Generalized skew coefficients...................................................................................................................................... 3 Summary ...................................................................................................................................................................... 4 References ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Little Sioux River Map #1
    Minnesota Diamond Lake !l ! Little Sioux River in Dickinson County 276 LAKE PARK ¬« ORLEANS 230# !l !9 Twin Forks Wildlife Area ¬«238 ! ¬«9 ! SPIRIT LAKE ! !| Twin Forks Canoe Access Cayler Prairie Preserve !l LYON # 225 ¬«86 OKOBOJI Spooky Hollow !#220 !| " !m Canoe Access !! DICKINSON EMMET !m # MILFORD # ! 210 215 Horseshoe Bend !| !_ ! OSCEOLA !| Judd Canoe Access # 205 # L 200 i FOSTORIA t t l e CLAY S ¤£71 i o u x # R !l Yellow Throat ive Wildlife Area 195 !r EVERLY 190# Photo by Clay Smith Stolleys Pit !l !l Reiter Wildlife Area chey ! O ed a ! n 185 SIOUX R !# SPENCER The Little Sioux River is an Iowa prairie stream. It begins its journey in the swampy iver ! !# ! area of southwestern Minnesota and flows for approximately 220 miles, emptying ¤£18 Bob Howe/Thunder Bridge !l 180 #175! into the Missouri River almost midway between Sioux City and Omaha. The !| Hawk Valley O’BRIEN West Leach Park !y !9 Wildlife Area Little Sioux may not offer consistent paddling opportunities in Dickinson and Oneota Little Sioux Access !| !l # Clay Counties, but it does flow by scenic prairie remnants and public areas. ¬«240 170 N On its southwesterly course past Spencer, its flow increases as it is joined ¤£59 Stouffer Memorial Wildlife Refuge !| PALO ALTO Little Sioux Wildlife Area !y ! by the Ocheyedan River. This is western Iowa’s largest interior stream; 2 mi. # 1 mi. 165 the Little Sioux’s watershed is nearly equal to the watersheds of the GILLETT GROVE Wapsipinicon and Maquoketa Rivers combined. High Bridge Wildlife Area !l # 160 Kindlespire Park !y !9 ! Riverside Access !l !y Because of its scenic beauty, the area from Spencer to Linn Grove !y !l !_ Wanata Park Access #155 # ! was designated as a Protected Water Area.
    [Show full text]