DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Workplan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project Workplan Attachment A Project Workplan Doc Type: Contract MPCA Use Only Swift #: 130553 CR #: 195017-PRO20170001 Project Title: Mississippi River Brainerd WRAPS Phase II 1. Project Summary: Organization: Aitkin County SWCD Contractor contact name: Janet Smude Title: District Technician Address: 130 Southgate Drive Aitkin, MN 56431 Phone: 218-927-6565 E-mail: [email protected] Subcontractor: Organization: RESPEC Project manager: Julie Blackburn Address: 1935 County Road B2 W, Suite 230 Roseville, MN 55113 Phone: 651-305-2272 E-mail: [email protected] Partner(s) Local Partner Team (LPT): Organization: Morrison Soil & Water Conservation District Project manager: Helen McLennan Phone: 320-616-2479 E-mail: [email protected] Organization: Crow Wing Soil & Water Conservation District Project manager: Melissa Barrick Phone: 218-828-6197 E-mail: [email protected] Organization: Todd Soil & Water Conservation District Project manager: Shannon Wettstein Phone: 320-732-2644 E-mail: [email protected] MPCA contact(s): www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • Use your preferred relay service • Available in alternative formats e-admin9-38 • 3/11/16 Page 1 of 6 MPCA project manager: Bonnie Finnerty Title: Watershed Project Manager Address: 7678 College Road Suite 105 Baxter, MN 56425 Phone: 218-316-3897 E-mail: [email protected] Project information Latitude/Longitude: N/A *County: Aitkin, Crow Wing, Morrison, Todd Start date: 09/15/2017 End date: 12/31/2020 Total cost: $249,945.12 *Full time equivalents: 1.50 *Major watershed(s): Statewide Kettle River Miss Rvr – GrandRpds Lower Rainy Rvr So Fork Crow River Big Fork River Lac Qui Parle River Miss Rvr –Headwaters Rainy Lake Lower St. Croix Rvr Upper Big Sioux Rvr Lake of the Woods Miss Rvr –LaCrescent Rapid River Upper St. Croix Rvr Lower Big Sioux Rvr Lake Superior – North Miss Rvr – Reno Red Lake River St. Louis River Blue Earth River Lake Superior – South Miss Rvr – Sartell Upper Red Rvr Red Rvr of the North Tamarac River Bois de Sioux River Le Sueur River Miss Rvr – St. Cloud Redeye River Thief River Buffalo River Leech Lake River Miss Rvr – Twin Cities Redwood River Two Rivers Cannon River Little Fork River Miss Rvr – Winona Rock River Upper/Lower Red Lk Cedar River Little Sioux River Miss Rvr – Lake Pepin Root River Upper Iowa River Chippewa River Long Prairie River Mustinka River Roseau River Vermilion River Clearwater River Red Rvr of the North Nemadji River Rum River Upper Wapsipinicon Marsh River River Cloquet River MN Rvr – Yellow No Fork Crow River Red Rvr of the North Watonwan River Medicine River Sandhill River Cottonwood River MN Rvr – Headwaters Otter Tail River Sauk River DesMoines Rvr Hdwtrs Crow Wing River MN Rvr – Mankato Pine River Shell Rock River Lower DesMoines Rvr E Fork DesMoines Rvr Lower MN River Pomme de Terre Rvr Snake River Wild Rice River Red Rvr of the North Miss Rvr – Brainerd Rainy Rvr – Hdwtrs Winnebago River Grand Marais Creek Zumbro River *Organization type: Federal government Local/Regional government For-profit Private college/university Individual Public college/university Non-profit State government Tribal government *Project type: Analysis/Interpretation Modeling Research Assessment/Evaluation Monitoring Restoration/Enhancement Demo/Pilot project Planning Technical assistance Education/Outreach/Engagement 2. Statement of Problems, Opportunities, and Existing Conditions The Upper Mississippi River - Brainerd Watershed covers 1,079,950 acres (1,687 square miles) in the north central part of the Upper Mississippi River Basin in Central Minnesota. The Watershed boundary begins in Aitkin County where the river flows through the cities of Aitkin, Brainerd/Baxter, and Little Falls. The Watershed encompasses all or parts of Aitkin, Cass, Crow Wing, Morrison, and Todd Counties. Almost half of the Watershed is forested (42%), while grasslands and shrub wetlands make up 38%, row crops 10%, water 6%, and 4% is urban. The majority of the Watershed is within the North Central Hardwood Forest with small sections in the Northern Lakes and Forests Ecoregion. The Watershed has approximately 2,149 total river miles and contains 212 lakes greater than 10 acres in size. www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • Use your preferred relay service • Available in alternative formats e-admin9-38 • 3/11/16 Page 2 of 6 Phase I of this project is already underway and involved creating a public outreach plan and gathering additional data. Phase II of the project provides an opportunity to implement the public outreach plan, utilize the data gathered to develop TMDLs and WRAPS reports, as well as build the capacity of the local community to engage in the process of watershed management and to adopt protection and restoration practices. The MPCA is currently monitoring the lakes and streams and will provide a list of water quality results and impairments in February 2018. At this time, the following waterbodies are impaired within the Watershed according to the 2016 303d List: Table 1 – 2016 Impaired Waters List for Mississippi River Brainerd Watershed Water body Water body Year AUID County Affected Pollutant or stressor TMDL TMDL name description added designated target target to List use start year completion year Big Swan Lake or 2010 77-0023-00 Todd Aquatic Nutrient/eutrophication 2016 2021 Reservoir Recreation biological indicators Blind Lake or 2010 01-0188-00 Aitkin Aquatic Nutrient/eutrophication 2016 2021 Reservoir Recreation biological indicators Buffalo Creek Headwaters 2006 07010104-523 Crow Wing Aquatic Life Aquatic 2016 2021 (Little Buffalo to Mississippi macroinvertebrate Creek) R bioassessments Buffalo Creek Headwaters 2002 07010104-523 Crow Wing Aquatic Life Fishes bioassessments 2016 2021 (Little Buffalo to Mississippi Creek) R Crow Wing Lake or 2010 18-0155-00 Crow Wing Aquatic Nutrient/eutrophication 2016 2021 Reservoir Recreation biological indicators Elm Island Lake or 2010 01-0123-00 Aitkin Aquatic Nutrient/eutrophication 2016 2021 Reservoir Recreation biological indicators Esquagamah Lake or 2010 01-0147-00 Aitkin Aquatic Nutrient/eutrophication 2016 2021 Reservoir Recreation biological indicators Fleming Lake or 2010 01-0105-00 Aitkin Aquatic Nutrient/eutrophication 2016 2021 Reservoir Recreation biological indicators Gun Lake or 2010 01-0099-00 Aitkin Aquatic Nutrient/eutrophication 2016 2021 Reservoir Recreation biological indicators Mississippi Pine R to 2016 07010104-656 Crow Wing Aquatic Life Total suspended solids 2016 2021 River Crow Wing R Mississippi Willow R to 1998 07010104-655 Aitkin Aquatic Life Turbidity 2016 2021 River Pine R Rice River Headwaters 2002 07010104-505 Aitkin Aquatic Life Fishes bioassessments 2016 2021 (Porcupine Lk 01-0066-00) to Section 5 Cr Swan River Headwaters 2010 07010104-502 Morrison Aquatic Life Dissolved oxygen 2016 2021 (Big Swan Lk 77-0023-00) to Mississippi R Trace Lake or 2008 77-0009-00 Todd Aquatic Nutrient/eutrophication 2016 2021 Reservoir Recreation biological indicators Waukenabo Lake or 2010 01-0136-00 Aitkin Aquatic Nutrient/eutrophication 2016 2021 Reservoir Recreation biological indicators The Aitkin County SWCD will be the project sponsor and oversee the financial aspects of the contract, as well as provide all relevant reporting requirements. RESPEC is the subcontractor who will prepare the TMDLs for the impaired waters, develop the WRAPS report, and provide three scenarios for modeling as well as sharing their work with the public and the Watershed Core Team made up of local partners, interested citizens and agency staff. The local partners will participate in meetings, review and provide comments to the documents and assist with the public outreach of the project. www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • Use your preferred relay service • Available in alternative formats e-admin9-38 • 3/11/16 Page 3 of 6 3. Goals, Objectives, Tasks, and Subtasks Goal: The goal of Phase II of the project is to implement the public civic engagement plan, to utilize the data collected in Phase I, as well as the monitoring and assessment data, to develop the TMDLs and WRAPs documents and develop modeling scenarios to prioritize protection and restoration efforts. Objective 1: Overall Project Administration Task A: Fiscal Management and Project Administration Subtask 1: Invoicing and reporting: Prepare and submit monthly or quarterly invoices for payment. Subtask 2: Develop and submit semi-annual reports by February 1st and August 1st of each year of the contract and complete a final report including a final financial report submitted to the MPCA thirty days of the original or amended end date of the contract. Responsible Party(ies): Aitkin County SWCD, RESPEC Objective 1 Timeline: September 15, 2017 – December 31, 2020 Objective 1 Cost: $10,956.96 Objective 1 Deliverables: Accurate and timely invoices submitted. Semi-annual and annual reports completed and submitted on time. Objective 2: Public Participation and Civic Engagement (CE). Task A: Communicate Project Milestones through the Implementation of the CE Plan. Create specific opportunities for citizen involvement. Emphasis will be on citizen execution of engagement activities and to build upon stronger collaborations and more engaged communities throughout the Watershed. This task includes the development of different sources of media to share our work with the public, (which may include but are not limited to, developing story maps, watershed events, videos, presentations, handouts and surveys). This may also include hosting meetings or attending other meetings to dialogue about the Watershed project. Subtask 1: Hold a minimum of three public meetings by October 2020 that allows stakeholders, the public and targeted audiences to play a more active role in natural resource restoration and protection as well as create an effective communication network for watershed programs and services. Subtask 2: Participate in a minimum of eight core team meetings to discuss project milestones, documents, and provide input to the watershed project. Subtask 3: Create a minimum of two press releases. These will be sent out via radio, newspaper, etc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 7050 Minnesota Pollutant Control Agency Waters of the State
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. July 10, 2020 In addition to the criteria provided in this document, EPA has approved site-specific standards for the following waters: Water Parameter(s) Rule Site Specific Standard EPA Approval Date Sauk River Flowage Eutrophication: 7050.0220 subp. 7 TP: < 90 µg/L 2/12/2020 Lakes including Total phosphorus Site-specific Chl-a: < 45 µg/L Horseshoe North, Chl-a modifications of Secchi depth: ≥ 0.8 m East Cedar Island, Secchi depth standards Koetter, Zumwalde, Great Northern, Krays, and Knaus/Park Sauk River Non- Eutrophication: 7050.0220 subp. 7 TP: < 55 µg/L 2/12/2020 flowage lakes Total phosphorus Site-specific Chl-a: < 32 µg/L including Chl-a modifications of Secchi depth: ≥ 1.4 m Horseshoe West, Secchi depth standards Horseshoe South, Cedar Island, and Bolfing Lower Minnesota Selenium 7050.0222 subp. 4 Selenium: 11 µg/L 10/21/2019 River Main Channel, Site-specific starting at modifications of approximately River standards Mile 6, at the discharge for the Seneca Wastewater Treatment Plant, and ending at the confluence of the Minnesota River with the Mississippi River Lower Minnesota Selenium 7050.0222 subp. 4 Selenium: 5.7 µg/L 10/21/2019 River Oxbow and Site-specific Floodplain Lakes modifications of (19-0078-00 and standards 27-0002-00) Lake Zumbro, Eutrophication: 7050.0220 subp.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Characteristics of Stream Subbasins in The
    PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF STREAM SUBBASINS IN THE SANOCKI PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF STREAM RIVER,SUBBASINS THE UPPER IN CEDAR RIVER, UPPER WAPSIPINICON ROCK SHELL ANDRIVER, UPPER WAPSIPINICON RIVER, UPPER CEDAR RIVER, SHELL ROCK OFR 99-471 RIVER, AND WINNEBAGO RIVER BASINS, SOUTHERN MINNESOTA AND NORTHERN IOWA MINNESOTA SOUTHEASTERN BASINS, RIVER, WINNEBAGO By Christopher A. Sanocki Open-File Report 99-471 Prepared in cooperation with the Minnesota Department of Transportation 99-471 OFR Mounds View, Minnesota 2000 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey 3K\VLFDO &KDUDFWHULVWLFV RI 6WUHDP 6XEEDVLQV LQ WKH 8SSHU :DSVLSLQLFRQ 5LYHU 8SSHU &HGDU 5LYHU 6KHOO 5RFN 5LYHU DQG :LQQHEDJR 5LYHU %DVLQV 6RXWKHUQ 0LQQHVRWD DQG 1RUWKHUQ ,RZD %\ &KULVWRSKHU $ 6DQRFNL $EVWUDFW Data that describe the physical characteristics of stream subbasins upstream from selected sites on streams in the Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper Cedar River, Shell Rock River, and Winnebago River Basins, located in southern Minnesota and northern Iowa are presented in this report. The physical characteristics are the drainage area of the subbasin, the percentage area of the subbasin covered only by lakes, the percentage area of the subbasin covered by both lakes and marsh, the main-channel length, and the main-channel slope. Stream sites include outlets of subbasins of at least 5 square miles, and locations of U.S. Geological Survey high-flow, and continuous-record gaging stations. ,QWURGXFWLRQ Selected data for sites on streams at outlets of subbasins larger than about 5 square miles; at This is the 16th report in a series detailing locations of U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) high- subbasin characteristics of streams in Minnesota flow, and continuous-record gaging stations and adjacent states.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Work Plan
    Attachment A Project Work Plan Doc Type: Contract MPCA Use Only Swift #: 103180 CR #: 8623 Project Title: Mississippi River Brainerd Watershed Restoration & Protection Project (Phase 1) 1. Project Summary: Organization: Aitkin SWCD Contractor contact name: Janet Smude Address: 130 Southgate Drive Aitkin, MN 56431 Phone: 218-927-6565 E-mail: [email protected] Partner(s) Local Partner Team (LPT): Organization: Morrison Soil & Water Conservation District Project manager: Helen McLennan Phone: 320-616-2479 E-mail: [email protected] Organization: Crow Wing Soil & Water Conservation District Project manager: Melissa Barrick Phone: 218-828-6197 E-mail: [email protected] Organization: Todd Soil & Water Conservation District Project manager: Shannon Wettstein Phone: 320-732-2644 E-mail: [email protected] Organization: Mississippi River Headwaters Board Project manager: Tim Terrill Phone: 218-824-1189 E-mail: [email protected] MPCA contact(s): MPCA project manager: Bonnie Finnerty Title: Watershed Project Manager Address: 7678 College Road, Suite 105 Baxter, MN 56425 Phone: 218-316-3897 E-mail: [email protected] www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats e-admin9-38 • 12/2/13 Page 1 of 4 Project information Latitude/Longitude: N/A *County: Multiple Counties – Aitkin, Crow Wing, Morrison & Todd Start date: 2/10/2016 End date: 6/30/2019 Total cost: 44,678.00 *Full time equivalents: .35 *Major watershed(s): Statewide Kettle River Miss Rvr – GrandRpds Rainy Rvr – Baudette So Fork Crow River Big Fork River Lac Qui Parle River Miss Rvr –Headwaters Rainy Rvr – Black Rvr Lower St.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Summaries of Selected Iowa Streamflow Data--Table 1
    Table 1 1 Table 1. Streamgages in Iowa included in this study. [no., number] Map Streamgage number Streamgage name Link to streamflow statistics for streamgage number (fig. 1) 1 05387440 Upper Iowa River at Bluffton, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05387440_stats.docx 2 05387500 Upper Iowa River at Decorah, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05387500_stats.docx 3 05388000 Upper Iowa River near Decorah, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05388000_stats.docx 4 05388250 Upper Iowa River near Dorchester, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05388250_stats.docx 5 05388500 Paint Creek at Waterville, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05388500_stats.docx 6 05389000 Yellow River near Ion, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05389000_stats.docx 7 05389400 Bloody Run Creek near Marquette, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05389400_stats.docx 8 05389500 Mississippi River at McGregor, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05389500_stats.docx 9 05411400 Sny Magill Creek near Clayton, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05411400_stats.docx 10 05411600 Turkey River at Spillville, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05411600_stats.docx 11 05411850 Turkey River near Eldorado, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05411850_stats.docx 12 05412000 Turkey River at Elkader, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05412000_stats.docx 13 05412020 Turkey River above French Hollow Creek at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05412020_stats.docx
    [Show full text]
  • CONTROL STRUCTURE LITTLE SIOUX RIVER, IOWA Hydraulic Model Investigation By
    TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 2-762 CONTROL STRUCTURE LITTLE SIOUX RIVER, IOWA Hydraulic Model Investigation by T. E. Murphy February 1967 Sponsored by U. S. Army Engineer District Omaha Conducted by U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station CORPS OF ENGINEERS TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 2-762 CONTROL STRUCTURE LITTLE SIOUX RIVER, IOWA Hydraulic Model Investigation by T. 2. Murphy February 1967 Sponsored by U. S. Army Engineer District Omaha Conducted by U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station CORPS OF ENGINEERS Destroy this report when no longer needed. Do not return it to the originator. The findings in this report are not to be construed as an official Department of the Army position unless so designated by other authorized documents. FOREWORD Model investigation of the control structure for Little Sioux River was authorized by the Office, Chief of Engineers on 25 May 1962, at the request of the U. S. Army Engineer District, Omaha. The study was conducted in the Hydraulics Division of the Waterways Experiment Station during the period July to December 1962. The investigation was conducted under the general supervision of Mr. E. P. Fortson, Jr., Chief of the Hydraulics Division, and Mr. F. R. Brown, Chief of the Hydrodynamics Branch, and under the direct supervision of Mr. T. E. Murphy, Chief of the Structures Section. The engineer in immediate charge of the model was Mr. E. S. Melsheimer, who was assisted by Mr. B. P. Fletcher. This report was prepared by Mr. Murphy. During the course of the investigation Messrs. E. R. Bloomquist, W. M. Linder, H. E.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Sioux River Watershed Biotic Stressor Identification Report
    Little Sioux River Watershed Biotic Stressor Identification Report April 2015 Authors Editing and Graphic Design Paul Marston Sherry Mottonen Jennifer Holstad Contributors/acknowledgements Michael Koschak Kim Laing The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs by Chandra Carter using the Internet to distribute reports and Chuck Regan information to wider audience. Visit our website Mark Hanson for more information. Katherine Pekarek-Scott MPCA reports are printed on 100% post-consumer Colton Cummings recycled content paper manufactured without Tim Larson chlorine or chlorine derivatives. Chessa Frahm Brooke Hacker Jon Lore Cover photo: Clockwise from Top Left: Little Sioux River at site 11MS010; County Ditch 11 at site 11MS078; Cattle around Unnamed Creek at site 11MS067 Project dollars provided by the Clean Water Fund (From the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment) Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North | Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 | www.pca.state.mn.us | 651-296-6300 Toll free 800-657-3864 | TTY 651-282-5332 This report is available in alternative formats upon request, and online at www.pca.state.mn.us Document number: wq-ws5-10230003a Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 2 Monitoring and assessment ...........................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Delineation Percentage
    Lake Superior - North Rainy River - Headwaters Lake Superior - South Vermilion River Nemadji River Cloquet River Pine River Rainy River - Rainy Lake Little Fork River Mississippi River - Headwaters Leech Lake River Upper St. Croix River Root River Big Fork River Mississippi River - Winona Upper/Lower Red Lake Kettle River Mississippi River - Lake Pepin Mississippi River - Grand Rapids Mississippi River - La Crescent Crow Wing River Otter Tail River Mississippi River - Reno Mississippi River - Brainerd Zumbro River Redeye River Upper Big Sioux River Mississippi River - Twin Cities Snake River Des Moines River - Headwaters St. Louis River Rum River Lower Big Sioux River Lower St. Croix River Cottonwood River Minnesota River - Headwaters Cannon River Mississippi River - St. Cloud Long Prairie River Lake of the Woods Lower Rainy North Fork Crow River Mississippi River - Sartell Lac Qui Parle River Buffalo River Wild Rice River Minnesota River - Mankato Sauk River Rock River Redwood River Snake River Chippewa River Watonwan River Clearwater River East Fork Des Moines River Red River of the North - Sandhill River Upper Red River of the North Blue Earth River Red River of the North - Marsh River Roseau River Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River Le Sueur River Little Sioux River Bois de Sioux River Cedar River Lower Minnesota River Pomme de Terre River Red Lake River Lower Des Moines River Upper Iowa River Red River of the North - Tamarac River Shell Rock River Two Rivers Rapid River Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek Mustinka River South Fork Crow River Thief River Winnebago River Upper Wapsipinicon River 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% %Altered %Natural %Impounded %No Definable Channel wq-bsm1-06.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Trends at Minnesota Milestone Sites
    Water Quality Trends for Minnesota Rivers and Streams at Milestone Sites Five of seven pollutants better, two getting worse June 2014 Author The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs by using the Internet to distribute reports and David Christopherson information to wider audience. Visit our website for more information. MPCA reports are printed on 100% post- consumer recycled content paper manufactured without chlorine or chlorine derivatives. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North | Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 | www.pca.state.mn.us | 651-296-6300 Toll free 800-657-3864 | TTY 651-282-5332 This report is available in alternative formats upon request, and online at www.pca.state.mn.us . Document number: wq-s1-71 1 Summary Long-term trend analysis of seven different water pollutants measured at 80 locations across Minnesota for more than 30 years shows consistent reductions in five pollutants, but consistent increases in two pollutants. Concentrations of total suspended solids, phosphorus, ammonia, biochemical oxygen demand, and bacteria have significantly decreased, but nitrate and chloride concentrations have risen, according to data from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s (MPCA) “Milestone” monitoring network. Recent, shorter-term trends are consistent with this pattern, but are less pronounced. Pollutant concentrations show distinct regional differences, with a general pattern across the state of lower levels in the northeast to higher levels in the southwest. These trends reflect both the successes of cleaning up municipal and industrial pollutant discharges during this period, and the continuing challenge of controlling the more diffuse “nonpoint” polluted runoff sources and the impacts of increased water volumes from artificial drainage practices.
    [Show full text]
  • (RFP) Project Title: ENRTF ID: 094-B
    Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2018 Request for Proposals (RFP) Project Title: ENRTF ID: 094-B ShellRock River Watershed Stormwater Quality Trading Pilot Program Category: B. Water Resources Total Project Budget: $ 350,000 Proposed Project Time Period for the Funding Requested: 2 years, July 2018 to June 2020 Summary: This project will develop and implement a model stormwater water quality credit trading framework. The purpose is to provide voluntary, cost effective, pollutant reductions on a watershed scale. Name: Courtney Christensen Sponsoring Organization: Shell Rock River Watershed District Address: 214 West Main Street Albert Lea MN 56007 Telephone Number: (507) 377-5785 Email [email protected] Web Address www.shellrock.org Location Region: Southeast County Name: Freeborn City / Township: Albert Lea Alternate Text for Visual: The attached visual aid is an exhibit showing the intended credit trading process and proposal. _____ Funding Priorities _____ Multiple Benefits _____ Outcomes _____ Knowledge Base _____ Extent of Impact _____ Innovation _____ Scientific/Tech Basis _____ Urgency _____ Capacity Readiness _____ Leverage _______ TOTAL ______% Page 1 of 8 07/29/2017 ENRTF ID: 094-B PROJECT TITLE: Shell Rock River Watershed Stormwater Quality Trading Pilot Program I. PROJECT STATEMENT The Stormwater Water Quality Trading Pilot Program (the “Program”) for the Shell Rock River Watershed District will develop and implement the state’s first water quality credit trading program for stormwater. Water quality trading is an innovative, voluntary, and cost effective methodology that can accelerate pollution reduction. This Program is a collaborative effort between the watershed district, the City of Albert Lea, and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • MN Association of Watershed Districts – 2020 Dues
    Minnesota Association of Watershed Districts, Inc. www.mnwatershed.org l 651-440-9407 Memo DATE: January 16, 2020 TO: Watershed District Administrators FROM: Emily Javens, Executive Director CC: MAWD President Mary Texer, Treasurer Sherry Davis White, Co-Treasurer Jackie Anderson MAWD Accountant Angie Fischer Obremski RE: 2020 ANNUAL DUES STATEMENT Please find attached the 2020 MAWD Membership Dues Worksheet that shows the amounts due from each watershed organization to be members of MAWD this year. The dues formula remained the same from last year, but your dues amount may have gone up or down based on the updated taxable market values for your watershed. The current dues payment for watershed districts is equal to 0.5% of each watershed district’s maximum general levy as defined in statute (before applying the $250,000 levy limit), not to exceed $7,500. Dues for water management organizations will remain at $500 for 2020. 2020 WD Dues = 2017 Taxable Market Value x 0.00048 x 0.005, not to exceed $7,500 2019 WMO Dues = $500 Please remit payment by February 28, 2020 to the MAWD Accountant: MN Association of Watershed Districts c/o Obremski Ltd. 1005 Mainstreet Hopkins, MN 55343 Thank you for your support! Attachments: 2020 MAWD Dues Worksheet BWSR Memo dated July 17, 2018 re: 2018 Taxable Market Values Minnesota Association of Watershed Districts, Inc. | 595 Aldine Street | St. Paul, MN 55104 www.mnwatershed.org 2020 MAWD Membership Dues WATERSHED DISTRICT NAME Estimated Market Values 2020 MAWD Dues BEAR VALLEY 221,457,700 531 BELLE CREEK 415,815,100 998 BOIS DE SIOUX 4,559,626,000 7,500 BROWN'S CREEK 1,938,920,100 4,653 BUFFALO CREEK 2,322,046,700 5,573 BUFFALO-RED RIVER 8,958,175,200 7,500 CAPITOL REGION 22,568,389,100 7,500 CARNELIAN MARINE ST.
    [Show full text]
  • A Physio-Chemical Analysis of the Headwaters of the Little Sioux River
    Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science Volume 77 Annual Issue Article 26 1970 A Physio-Chemical Analysis of the Headwaters of the Little Sioux River Milbert H. Krohn Spirit Lake Community School Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©1970 Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias Recommended Citation Krohn, Milbert H. (1970) "A Physio-Chemical Analysis of the Headwaters of the Little Sioux River," Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, 77(1), 172-176. Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol77/iss1/26 This Research is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa Academy of Science at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Krohn: A Physio-Chemical Analysis of the Headwaters of the Little Sioux A Physio-Chemical Analysis of the Headwaters of the Little Sioux River MILBERT H. KROHN 1 Abstract. The magnitude and seasonal variation of 11 selected physio­ chemical characteristics at four collection sites in the headwater region of the Little Sioux River are reported for a 12-month perod from March 1969 through February 1970. Little variation was found between study sites for given sampling times. For several decades the headwaters and adjacent terrestrial areas of the Little Sioux River have been th object of considerable scientific investigation. This study, by students in summer courses at the Iowa Lakeside Laboratory, has resulted in limited informa­ tion through publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Archive-History-Redeemer-Rudd.Pdf
    A R C H I V E S I O W A D I S T R I C T E A S T A History of Redeemer Lutheran—Rudd, Iowa It all started when someone contacted the LCMS—Iowa District East office to find out what information our church had on the existence of a Lutheran congregation in Rudd, Floyd County, Iowa. Going through the files in the IDE Archives, the folder about Rudd had hardly anything in it. So the archivist began searching other IDE records, contacted the ELCA Archives in Dubuque, and made a visit to Rudd to come up with an answer for the person making the inquiry. Out of the information gathered, this is now an attempt to put together a brief history of the congregation that is no longer in existence; known as Redeemer Lutheran Church at the time it was disbanded. It had its beginnings in the 1850s and ceased to exist around 1969. Time Before the Church While European setters were working their way westward from the east coast of early America, there were people already moving around on the land we today call Iowa. In a manner of speaking, their map of the region had its own counties. Unlike the Iowa of our time, with its 99 demarcated counties, the Indian Nations saw this land between the Mississippi and the Missouri Rivers as a land occupied by five people groups: Dakota Sioux, Illini, Ioway, Missouria, and Otoe. Each nation had its own village centers and the vast open spaces were their hunting grounds to provide food for their people.1 As European settlers continued to push further west, the Indian Nations before them either resisted, or moved out of the way.
    [Show full text]