DOCSLIB.ORG

Historical Surface Fire Frequency in Ponderosa Pine Stands In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Historical Surface Fire Frequency in Ponderosa Pine Stands In ABSTRACT: "Historical range of variability" and "reference conditions" are two concepts that attempt to characterize ecosystem conditions as they may exist in the absence of RESEARCH ARTICLE pervasive human impacts. However, to define reference conditions from reference landscapes, such as U.S. Forest Service Research Natural Areas, requires a long-term perspective by which to assess whether existing ecosystem conditions are driven by predominately natural rather than human factors. We used fire-scarred trees to reconstruct • centuries-long chronologies of surface fires in four research natural areas (three established and one proposed) that contain ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa Laws.) forests in South Historical Surface Dakota, Wyoming, and Colorado. Fire frequency was variable among research natural areas, but recent fire-free periods in three of the four areas were up to approximately 2.5 Fire Frequency in times longer than any presettlement intervals. Loss of surface fires most likely is related indirectly to recent land and resource use in areas outside of the research natural areas and related directly to fire suppression and livestock grazing in the research natural areas Ponderosa Pine themselves. Studies that attempt to define reference conditions for ponderosa pine ecosystems from existing conditions in these Research Natural Areas will need to consider Stands in Research changes that may have occurred in these areas as the result of loss of historical fire patterns. Determination of historical fire frequency also should provide useful information Natural Areas, for the management or restoration of ecosystem processes and conditions in these or similar natural areas. Central Rocky Index terms: fire chronologies, cross-dating, fire scars, historical range of variability, Pinus ponderosa Mountains and Black Hills, USA INTRODUCTION agement agencies are among the factors Peter M. Brown that have disrupted surface fire regimes in While change is normal in all ecosystems, ponderosa pine forests (Savage 1991; Cov- Rocky Mountain the rate or direction of ecological changes ington and Moore 1992, 1994; Touchan et Tree-Ring Research, Inc. brought about by land and natural resource al. 1995; Brown and Sieg 1996; Swetnam 2901 Moore Lane use during recent decades may be outside and Baisan 1996; Rile et al. 1997). Shifts Fort Collins, CO 80526 USA the range of what many ecosystems are from historical patterns also have resulted [email protected] able to sustain before they shift into new in altered fire regimes, with high-severity modes of behavior (Covington et al. 1994, crown-destroying fires replacing low-se- Michael G. Ryan Holling and Meffe 1996). A well-docu- verity surface fires (Swetnam 1990, Cov- Thomas G. Andrews mented example is changes that have oc- ington and Moore 1994, Arno et al. 1995), curred in ponderosa pine (Pinus pondero- and have led some researchers to question USDA Forest Service sa Laws.) forests of the western United whether ponderosa pine ecosystems are Rocky Mountain Research Station States over the past century (Cooper 1960; sustainable under these new disturbance 240 W. Prospect Road White 1985; Covington and Moore 1992, regimes (Covington et al. 1994). Ft. Collins, CO 80526 USA 1994; Mutch et al. 1993; Arno et al. 1995; • Rile et al. 1997). Historically open forests For management of ecosystems, it is crit- with scattered trees and high understory ical to know when human manipulation of biomass and diversity have shifted to for- ecosystem components may be compro- ests dominated by closed-canopy stands mising ecosystem function and resilience with reduced understory production and (Holling and Meffe 1996). Two species composition. Historical conditions concepts—"historical range of variability" were maintained by frequent, episodic (HRV; Morgan et al. 1994) and "reference surface fires that killed ponderosa pine conditions" (e.g., Kaufmann et al. seedlings and saplings before they were 1994)—are used to characterize able to reach the forest overstory (Cooper ecosystem processes and patterns in the 1960, White 1985). Livestock grazing, absence of pervasive human impacts. logging, geographical fragmentation HRV refers to long-term patterns of Natural Areas Journal 20:133—139 caused by road and fence construction, ecosystem conditions that prevailed and active fire suppression by land man- before, generally, the middle to late 1800s, when widespread non-Native Amer- Volume 20 (2), 2000 Natural Areas Journal 133 ican—primarily Euro-American—settle- We reconstructed historical ranges of vari- considered to be representative of condi- ment in the western United States began in ability in surface fire frequency in ponde- tions driven by predominately natural rather earnest. Although Native Americans are rosa pine stands at four RNAs (three es- than human agents. known to have altered ecosystems to a tablished and one proposed) in Colorado, limited extent prior to settlement, their Wyoming, and South Dakota. Fire frequen- At three of the four study areas, we col- effects do not match the predominance cy in the RNAs was reconstructed using lected 10 to 13 fire-scarred ponderosa pine and ubiquity of impacts that have occurred fire-scar records in dendrochronologically trees each from two stand-level sites to during the recent century as a result of cross-dated tree-ring series. These recon- provide replication of both spatial and tem- population increases and industrialization. structions were made to assess if fire fre- poral patterns in fire frequency (Table 1; Reference conditions are ecosystem con- quency was different in these reference Brown and Sieg 1996, 1999). At the fourth ditions defined either from analysis of landscapes during the postsettlement peri- study area (Hot Creek), we collected 18 presettlement patterns or from present-day od, or if recent fire frequency and likely fire-scarred ponderosa pine trees from one ecosystems that have been altered mini- associated ecosystem processes in the site (Table 1). Sites ranged in size from 10 to mally by human impacts. Present-day eco- RNAs are within the HRV. 20 ha and were selected based upon the systems useful for defining reference con- presence of adequate old-age fire-scarred ditions may be found in wilderness areas, METHODS trees or remnant (dead) material. The goal of many National Park Service landscapes, collection at each site was to obtain a and Forest Service Research Natural Areas Study Areas comprehensive, long-term inventory of past (RNAs; e.g., Ryan et al. 1994). RNAs are fires using fire scar records from individual permanently protected landscapes that have Four study areas were selected in South trees (Brown and Sieg 1996, Swetnam and been set aside principally for the purposes Dakota, Wyoming, and Colorado. These Baisan 1996). Long-term sequences of fire of maintaining certain aspects of biological included three established RNAs—Upper scars often are recorded on individual trees. diversity and conducting Pine Creek in the Black Hills National However, individual trees may be missing non-manipulative ecological research Forest of South Dakota (Ryan et al. 1994), fire records because not all fires that (Ryan et al. 1994). Lone Pine in the Arapahoe-Roosevelt Na- burned in the vicinity of a tree may be tional Forest in northern Colorado, and recorded as scars, and scars may be burned While both of these concepts, HRV and Hot Creek in the Rio Grande National off by subsequent fires or other-wise eroded reference conditions, are crucial for scien- Forest in southern Colorado—and one from the scar record. tifically based ecosystem management pro-posed RNA, Ashenfelder Basin in the (Kaufmann et al. 1994, Holling and Meffe Medicine Bow National Forest in central Upper Pine Creek was established as an 1996, Leslie et al. 1996), reference land- Wyoming (Table 1). Each of the RNAs RNA in 1931, the first in this region of the scapes can be used to characterize refer- contained unroaded, old-growth pondero- U.S. Forest Service (Ryan et al. 1994). The ence conditions only if one uses a sa pine stands that have had a history of 482-ha RNA is in the rocky, isolated center long-term perspective to a sse ss whether little or no logging or other significant range of the Black Hills and contained present-day conditions in these landscapes human disturbances during the twentieth within the Black Elk Wilderness Area. As represent predominately natural rather than century. Native American impacts before in many areas of the Black Hills, ponderosa human factors. Probably no ecosystem on the twentieth century probably occurred pine regeneration in Upper Pine Creek has Earth has escaped at least some minimal to some extent in each of the areas. been heavy during the twentieth century, level of impact from industrial society How-ever, the RNAs are for the most part and there are many areas of dense, often (Swanson et al. 1993, Kaufmann et at. located in areas with difficult access and suppressed trees (McAdams 1995). 1994, Vitousek et al. 1997). Although log- each is ging, road construction, or other landscape fragmentation may not have occurred in a reference landscape with a history of sur- Table 1. Fire history study sites in Research Natural Areas in South Dakota, Wyoming, and face fires, fire cessation in adjacent land- Colorado. scapes may have excluded landscape-scale fires from the reference area. In addition, Site Elevation Latitude (N)/ active fire suppression by land manage- Code Range (m) Longitude (W) ment agencies has occurred in virtually all Site Name ecosystems of the western United States. Exclusion of surface fires from a reference Upper Pine Creek, S.D. UPC 1660–1690 43° 53.0' / 103° 30.0' area may result in changes in ecosystem Upper Pine Creek Middle, S.D. UPM 1670–1720 43° 52.5' / 103° 30.5' structure and function that are as pro- Ashenfelder Basin Lower, Wyo. ASL 1920–1950 42° 20.0' / 105° 23.0 nounced as those in more directly impact- Ashenfelder Basin Upper, Wyo.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Published Proceedings from the CWD Forum
    PROCEEDINGS Jackson Hole Chronic Wasting Disease Forum December 7, 2016 National Museum of Wildlife Art Jackson, Wyoming INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Chronic Wasting Disease forum was to highlight CWD research and management considerations, with the goal to share current science-based information with the general public and all organizations concerned with the long-term health of elk and deer populations in the Jackson Hole Area. ABSTRACTS *Names of presenters in bold text Wyoming Chronic Wasting Disease Surveillance Mary Wood, State Veterinarian, Wildlife Veterinary Research Services, Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Laramie, Wyoming, USA Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) was first described in captive mule deer from Colorado and Wyoming in the 1970’s (Williams 1980). After the initial discovery and description of this disease, the Wyoming Game and Fish Department (WGFD) began collaborative work with Dr. Elizabeth Williams in 1982 to investigate whether the disease was present in free-ranging populations (Williams 1992, Miller 2000). This was the beginning of a decades-long surveillance program to study the distribution and spread of this disease in free-ranging cervid populations. Between 1982 and 1997 a limited number of CWD samples were collected through local check stations near Laramie and Wheatland WY. WGFD surveillance began in earnest in 1997, with peak surveillance occurring between 2003 and 2011 when federal funding was available. Currently the WGFD Wildlife Health Laboratory tests between 1500 and 3500 samples for CWD each year with over 56,000 samples tested to date in Wyoming. Surveillance includes voluntary sample collection from hunter harvested animals as well as collection from road-killed animals and targeted animals showing signs consistent with CWD.
    [Show full text]
  • Lakamie Basin, Wyoming
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR BULLETIN 364 GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF THE LAKAMIE BASIN, WYOMING A PRELIMINARY REPORT BY N. H. DARTON AND C. E. SIEBENTHAL WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1909 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction............................................................. 7 Geography ............................................................... 8 Configuration........................................................ 8 Drainage ............................................................ 9 Climate ............................................................. 9 Temperature...................................................... 9 Precipitation..................................................... 10 Geology ................................................................. 11 Stratigraphy.......................................................... 11 General relations........................../....................... .11 Carboniferous system............................................. 13 Casper formation......................... .................... 13. General character........................................ 13 Thickness ............................................... 13 Local features............................................ 14 Erosion and weathering of limestone slopes ................ 18 Paleontology and age..................................... 19 Correlation .............................................. 20 Forelle limestone............................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Publication of the Wyoming Native Plant Society
    Castilleja A Publication of the Wyoming Native Plant Society Mar 2004, Volume 23, No. 1 www.uwyo.edu/wyndd/wnps/wnps_home.htm Adventures in Laramie-Peak-Land By Hollis Marriott What does it take to convert a middle- aged construction worker with a big 4-WD pickup truck into a field botanist looking for rare plants? “Impossible!” you are probably thinking to yourself. But strange things can happen in the land of the Laramie Batholith and the Central Metamorphic Complex. The Laramie columbine, Aquilegia laramiensis, is endemic to the Laramie Mountains in southeast Wyoming. It was discovered by Aven Nelson in 1895 on a botanizing trip on and around Laramie Peak. The flowers of this little columbine are nodding, and are borne among the leaves. They have greenish-white to lavender sepals, and cream to lavender petals with spurs less than 10 mm long. Prior to the 2003 field season, Aquilegia laramiensis was known from just 12 sites, two of which were considered historical without precise location data. Most were in the northern part of the Laramie Mountains, in the vicinity of Laramie Peak. The columbine also occurs on Ragged Top Mountain about 60 miles to the south, and Char Delmatier found it roughly halfway Aquilegia laramiensis, by Isobel Nichols between Laramie Peak and Ragged Top in In this issue: 1993. Most of the known populations were Living floras – keeping score of score-keepers . 3 growing on granite rocks. The columbine Physaria vitulifera status in Wyoming . 5 appeared to be rare, but those in the know Invasive species and CBM development .
    [Show full text]
  • Weather Modification Level III Feasibility Study Laramie Range Siting and Design Executive Summary
    Weather Modification Level III Feasibility Study Laramie Range Siting and Design Executive Summary Frank McDonough, John F. Mejia, Kacie N. Shourd, Rosemary W. Carroll, Alexandra D. Lutz, Jeff Dean, Jeese W. Juchtzer, Arlen W. Huggins, Mike L. Kaplan Desert Research Institute Reno, Nevada Ray DeLuna, Cameron Trembath TREC, Inc Casper, Wyoming Executive Summary A Level III Siting and Design Study was conducted by the Desert Research Institute (DRI) to assess the potential for an operational cloud-seeding program in the Laramie Range of south- central Wyoming. The study was funded by the Wyoming State Legislature through the Wyoming Water Development Commission (WWDC). The goal of this project was to assess the potential to increase snowpack and the resulting runoff in streams of the Range that provide water to the North Platte River using a well-designed cloud seeding program. The executive summary summarizes the study but more detailed analysis can be found in the full report. Winter cloud seeding has been conducted across the mountains of the western United States for more than six decades. Results of these studies suggest that a carefully planned and operated program can lead to snowfall increases of up to 10% for seeded storms compared to unseeded storms (Breed et al. 2015). The decreased snowfall in unseeded clouds is a result of inefficient ice crystal production in cloud layers with temperatures warmer than -15oC (5oF). Small aerosols that serve as the embryonic lattice structure for ice to begin to form often don’t become active in natural clouds until cloud temperatures cool below these levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Bighorn Sheep Disease Risk Assessment
    Risk Analysis of Disease Transmission between Domestic Sheep and Goats and Rocky Mountain Bighorn Sheep Prepared by: ______________________________ Cory Mlodik, Wildlife Biologist for: Shoshone National Forest Rocky Mountain Region C. Mlodik, Shoshone National Forest April 2012 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Bighorn Sheep Disease Risk Assessment Contents Background ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Bighorn Sheep Distribution and Abundance......................................................................................... 1 Literature
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Areas in the Snowy Range Mountains
    Chapter 3 MEDICINE BOW NATIONAL FOREST Revised Land and Resource Management Plan Geographic Areas Table of Contents 3.................................................................................................................................... 3-1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................3-1 Relationship to Forest Plan Direction.....................................................................3-1 Desired Condition...................................................................................................3-1 Purpose of Geographic Areas .................................................................................3-1 Description of Geographic Areas............................................................................3-2 GEOGRAPHIC AREAS IN THE LARAMIE RANGE ...........................................................3-4 Bear Creek Geographic Area..................................................................................3-5 Box Elder Geographic Area....................................................................................3-8 Cottonwood Creek Geographic Area....................................................................3-11 Horseshoe Creek Geographic Area.......................................................................3-14 LaBonte Creek Geographic Area..........................................................................3-17 Palmer Canyon Geographic Area .........................................................................3-20
    [Show full text]
  • Bighorn Sheep PERIOD: 6/1/2014 - 5/31/2015 HERD: BS106 - TARGHEE HUNT AREAS: 6 PREPARED BY: ALYSON COURTEMANCH
    2014 - JCR Evaluation Form SPECIES: Bighorn Sheep PERIOD: 6/1/2014 - 5/31/2015 HERD: BS106 - TARGHEE HUNT AREAS: 6 PREPARED BY: ALYSON COURTEMANCH 2009 - 2013 Average 2014 2015 Proposed Average Harvest Age 6.5 3.5 6.5 Hunter Success 43% 100% 67% Harvest: 1 1 2 Hunters: 2 1 3 Hunter Success: 50% 100% 67% Active Licenses: 2 1 3 Active License Success: 50% 100% 67% Recreation Days: 12 7 24 Days Per Animal: 12 7 12 Males per 100 Females: 35 0 Juveniles per 100 Females 33 0 Alternative Population Objectives: 6-8 years old ≥ 50% success Management Strategy: Special 143 144 145 2004 - 2014 Postseason Classification Summary for Bighorn Sheep Herd BS106 - TARGHEE MALES FEMALES JUVENILES Males to 100 Females Young to Tot Cls Conf 100 Conf 100 Year Post Pop Ylg Adult Total % Total % Total % Cls Obj Ylng Adult Total Int Fem Int Adult 2004 0 0 8 8 38% 9 43% 4 19% 21 0 0 89 89 ± 0 44 ± 0 24 2005 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 2006 0 0 2 2 17% 6 50% 4 33% 12 0 0 33 33 ± 0 67 ± 0 50 2007 0 8 22 30 31% 51 53% 15 16% 96 0 16 43 59 ± 0 29 ± 0 19 2008 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 2009 0 1 16 17 21% 48 59% 16 20% 81 0 2 33 35 ± 0 33 ± 0 25 2010 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 2011 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 2012 125 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 2013 125 0 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 2014 125 3 28 31 54% 20 35% 6 11% 57 122 15 140 155 ± 42 30 ± 13 12 2015 HUNTING SEASONS TARGHEE BIGHORN SHEEP HERD (BS106) Hunt Dates of Seasons Type Quota License Limitations Area Opens Closes 6 1 Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Bighorn Sheep Research Activity 2016-17 Love Stowell & Ernest 1May2017 Wildlife Genomics & Disease Ecology Lab Updated 04/27/2017 SMLS
    Bighorn Sheep Research Activity 2016-17: Love Stowell & Ernest_1May2017 Bighorn Sheep Research Activity 2016-17 Love Stowell & Ernest_1May2017 Wildlife Genomics & Disease Ecology Lab Updated 04/27/2017 SMLS Sample acquisition Samples acquired to date from sheep captured or killed 2012-2017 Figure 1- Distribution of bighorn sheep samples that were captured or killed 2014-2017 in Wyoming. Red outlines indicate the Wyoming Game & Fish Department Hunt Areas. Blue dots are samples from males (n = 263, mainly tissue samples from legally hunted animals), pink dots are females (n = 559, mix of whole blood and FTA card samples), gray dots are unknown sex (n = 138). Several locations such as Cody and Dubois are represented as a single point but multiple animals were sampled in those locations. Dots are representative of samples, not of unique individuals, which may be lower if animals were recaptured. Females are well sampled in the Jackson, Whiskey Mountain, and Absaroka herds but not in other herds which are only sampled by legally hunted rams and pickup heads. Outside of the northwest corner of the state, sampling is mainly limited to hunted rams. Dots outside hunt area boundaries are represent wandering rams, fecal collections, or planned captures. The number of samples from 2014-2016 available and analyzed from each hunt area are listed in Table 4. Page 1 of 5 Bighorn Sheep Research Activity 2016-17: Love Stowell & Ernest_1May2017 Received in 2016-17 593 new samples acquired in 2016-17 Variety of sample types, sample locations (see tables)
    [Show full text]
  • Laramie Peak Area Wyoming
    .2.7,5- STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS LARAMIE PEAK AREA WYOMING GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1397-B Mineral Resources of the Laramie Peak Study Area, Albany and Converse Counties, Wyoming By KENNETH SEGERSTROM, U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, and ROBERT C. WEISNER, U.S. BUREAU OF MINES With a section on AEROMAGNETIC INTERPRETATION By M. DEAN KLEINKOPF, U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1397-B An evaluation of the mineral potential of the area UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1977 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Segerstrom, Kenneth, 1909- Mineral resources of the Laramie Peak study area, Albany and Converse Counties, Wyoming. (Studies related to wilderness) (Geological Survey Bulletin 1397-B) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.3:1397-6 1. Mines and mineral resources Wyoming-Laramie Peak. I. Weisner, Robert C., joint author. II. Kleinkopf, Merlin Dean. Aeromagnetic interpretation. 1976. HI. Title. IV. Series. V. Series: United States Geological Survey Bulletin 1397-B QE75.B9 no. 1397-B [TN24.W8] 557.3'08s [553'.09787'l6] 76-608252 Foi sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-02962-6 STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS In accordance with the provisions of the Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, Sept. 3, 1964) and the Joint Conference Report on Senate Bill 4, 88th Congress, the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines have been conducting mineral surveys of wilderness and primitive areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter #3 the Affected Environment and Consequences
    Chapter 3 MEDICINE BOW NATIONAL FOREST Land and Resource Management Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement Affected Environment and Consequences Table of Contents Purpose and Organization of this Chapter .............................................................................. 3-1 Physical Elements....................................................................................................................... 3-7 Air.......................................................................................................................................... 3-7 Aquatic Resources ............................................................................................................... 3-15 Heritage Resources .............................................................................................................. 3-65 Soil....................................................................................................................................... 3-78 Biological Elements .................................................................................................................. 3-92 Biological Diversity............................................................................................................. 3-92 Noxious, Invasive, and Non-native Species ...................................................................... 3-175 Fire and Fuels Management............................................................................................... 3-188 Insects and Disease ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Medicine Bow-Routt National Forests & Thunder Basin National
    Medicine Bow-Routt National Forests & Thunder Basin National Grassland Fire Danger Operating Plan 2014 Medicine Bow-Routt National Forests & Thunder Basin National Grassland Fire Danger Operating Plan 2 Medicine Bow-Routt National Forests & Thunder Basin National Grassland Fire Danger Operating Plan Medicine Bow-Routt National Forest and Thunder Basin National Grassland Fire Danger Operating Plan USDA Forest Service Prepared By: Date: Jerod R. DeLay, Engine Captain, LRD Reviewed By: Date: Vern Bentley, Forest FMO Approved By: Date: Phil Cruz, Forest Supervisor 3 Medicine Bow-Routt National Forests & Thunder Basin National Grassland Fire Danger Operating Plan 4 Medicine Bow-Routt National Forests & Thunder Basin National Grassland Fire Danger Operating Plan Table of Contents I. Introduction 7 II. Roles and Responsibilities 7 A. Fire Weather Station Owner/Manager 7 B. Communications 7 C. Field Operations Managers 8 D. Program Managers 9 III. Fire Danger Rating Inventory 9 A. Administrative Unit 9 B. Vegetation 12 C. Climate 12 D. Topography 13 E. Fire Problem Identification 14 F. Fire Danger Decision Levels 15 G. Weather Stations 16 IV. Fire Danger and Fire Business Analysis 19 A. Fire Danger Rating Areas 19 B. Fire Weather Data 19 C. Fire Occurrence Data 20 D. Parameters Used to Calculate Fire Danger 20 E. Climatological Percentiles 20 V. Fire Danger Based Decisions 20 A. Adjective Fire Danger Rating (AFDR) 20 B. Operations and Preparedness 21 C. Preparedness Levels 21 D. Response Levels 22 VI. Operational Procedures 22 A. Adjective Fire Danger Rating 22 B. Adjective Fire Danger Rating 23 C. Seasonal Risk Analysis 23 D. Thresholds 24 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicine Bow-Routt National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 10/01/2020 to 12/31/2020 Medicine Bow-Routt National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2021 12/2021 Nancy Rusho 228, subpart A. Orders DEIS NOA in Federal Register 202-731-9196 EIS 09/13/2018 [email protected] Est. FEIS NOA in Federal Register 11/2021 Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. These regulations apply to all NFS lands open to mineral entry under the US mining laws. More Information is available at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/science-technology/geology/minerals/locatable-minerals/current-revisions. Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) 10/01/2020 04:06 am MT Page 1 of 20 Medicine Bow-Routt National Forest Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) Amendments to Land - Land management planning In Progress: Expected:07/2020 07/2020 John Shivik Management Plans Regarding - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants Objection Period Legal Notice 801-625-5667 Sage-grouse Conservation 08/02/2019 [email protected] EIS Description: The Forest Service is considering amending its land management plans to address new and evolving issues arising since implementing sage-grouse plans in 2015.
    [Show full text]