DOCSLIB.ORG

Human Rights Act 1998

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Human Rights Act 1998 Human Rights Act 1998 1998 CHAPTER 42 An Act to give further effect to rights and freedoms guaranteed under the European Convention on Human Rights; to make provision with respect to holders of certain judicial offices who become judges of the European Court of Human Rights; and for connected purposes. [9th November 1998] BE IT ENACTED by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— Introduction 1 The Convention Rights (1) In this Act ―the Convention rights‖ means the rights and fundamental freedoms set out in— (a) Articles 2 to 12 and 14 of the Convention, (b) Articles 1 to 3 of the First Protocol, and (c) [Article 1 of the Thirteenth Protocol], as read with Articles 16 to 18 of the Convention. (2) Those Articles are to have effect for the purposes of this Act subject to any designated derogation or reservation (as to which see sections 14 and 15). (3) The Articles are set out in Schedule 1. (4) The [Secretary of State] may by order make such amendments to this Act as he considers appropriate to reflect the effect, in relation to the United Kingdom, of a protocol. (5) In subsection (4) ―protocol‖ means a protocol to the Convention— (a) which the United Kingdom has ratified; or (b) which the United Kingdom has signed with a view to ratification. Reproduced by permission of Reed Elsevier (UK) Limited trading as LexisNexis (6) No amendment may be made by an order under subsection (4) so as to come into force before the protocol concerned is in force in relation to the United Kingdom. NOTES Initial Commencement To be appointed To be appointed: see s 22(3). Appointment Appointment: 2 October 2000: see SI 2000/1851, art 2. Amendment Sub-s (1): in para (c) words ―Article 1 of the Thirteenth Protocol‖ in square brackets substituted by SI 2004/1574, art 2(1). Date in force: 22 June 2004: see SI 2004/1574, art 1. Sub-s (4): words ―Secretary of State‖ in square brackets substituted by SI 2003/1887, art 9, Sch 2, para 10(1). Date in force: 19 August 2003: see SI 2003/1887, art 1(2). Subordinate Legislation Human Rights Act 1998 (Amendment) Order 2004, SI 2004/1574 (made under sub-s (4)). 2 Interpretation of Convention rights (1) A court or tribunal determining a question which has arisen in connection with a Convention right must take into account any— (a) judgment, decision, declaration or advisory opinion of the European Court of Human Rights, (b) opinion of the Commission given in a report adopted under Article 31 of the Convention, (c) decision of the Commission in connection with Article 26 or 27(2) of the Convention, or (d) decision of the Committee of Ministers taken under Article 46 of the Convention, whenever made or given, so far as, in the opinion of the court or tribunal, it is relevant to the proceedings in which that question has arisen. (2) Evidence of any judgment, decision, declaration or opinion of which account may have to be taken under this section is to be given in proceedings before any court or tribunal in such manner as may be provided by rules. (3) In this section ―rules‖ means rules of court or, in the case of proceedings before a tribunal, rules made for the purposes of this section— (a) by . [the Lord Chancellor or] the Secretary of State, in relation to any proceedings outside Scotland; (b) by the Secretary of State, in relation to proceedings in Scotland; or (c) by a Northern Ireland department, in relation to proceedings before a tribunal in Northern Ireland— (i) which deals with transferred matters; and Reproduced by permission of Reed Elsevier (UK) Limited trading as LexisNexis (ii) for which no rules made under paragraph (a) are in force. NOTES Initial Commencement To be appointed To be appointed: see s 22(3). Appointment Appointment: 2 October 2000: see SI 2000/1851, art 2. Amendment Sub-s (3): in para (a) words omitted repealed by SI 2003/1887, art 9, Sch 2, para 10(2). Date in force: 19 August 2003: see SI 2003/1887, art 1(2). Sub-s (3): in para (a) words ―the Lord Chancellor or‖ in square brackets inserted by SI 2005/3429, art 8, Schedule, para 3. Date in force: 12 January 2006: see SI 2005/3429, art 1(2). Subordinate Legislation Act of Adjournal (Criminal Procedure Rules Amendment No 2) (Human Rights Act 1998) 2000, SSI 2000/315. Act of Sederunt (Rules of the Court of Session Amendment No 6) (Human Rights Act 1998) 2000, SSI 2000/316. Legislation 3 Interpretation of legislation (1) So far as it is possible to do so, primary legislation and subordinate legislation must be read and given effect in a way which is compatible with the Convention rights. (2) This section— (a) applies to primary legislation and subordinate legislation whenever enacted; (b) does not affect the validity, continuing operation or enforcement of any incompatible primary legislation; and (c) does not affect the validity, continuing operation or enforcement of any incompatible subordinate legislation if (disregarding any possibility of revocation) primary legislation prevents removal of the incompatibility. NOTES Initial Commencement To be appointed To be appointed: see s 22(3). Appointment Appointment: 2 October 2000: see SI 2000/1851, art 2. Reproduced by permission of Reed Elsevier (UK) Limited trading as LexisNexis 4 Declaration of incompatibility (1) Subsection (2) applies in any proceedings in which a court determines whether a provision of primary legislation is compatible with a Convention right. (2) If the court is satisfied that the provision is incompatible with a Convention right, it may make a declaration of that incompatibility. (3) Subsection (4) applies in any proceedings in which a court determines whether a provision of subordinate legislation, made in the exercise of a power conferred by primary legislation, is compatible with a Convention right. (4) If the court is satisfied— (a) that the provision is incompatible with a Convention right, and (b) that (disregarding any possibility of revocation) the primary legislation concerned prevents removal of the incompatibility, it may make a declaration of that incompatibility. (5) In this section ―court‖ means— [(a) the Supreme Court;] (b) the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council; (c) the [Court Martial Appeal Court]; (d) in Scotland, the High Court of Justiciary sitting otherwise than as a trial court or the Court of Session; (e) in England and Wales or Northern Ireland, the High Court or the Court of Appeal; [(f) the Court of Protection, in any matter being dealt with by the President of the Family Division, the [Chancellor of the High Court] or a puisne judge of the High Court]. (6) A declaration under this section (―a declaration of incompatibility‖)— (a) does not affect the validity, continuing operation or enforcement of the provision in respect of which it is given; and (b) is not binding on the parties to the proceedings in which it is made. NOTES Initial Commencement To be appointed To be appointed: see s 22(3). Appointment Appointment: 2 October 2000: see SI 2000/1851, art 2. Amendment Sub-s (5): para (a) substituted by the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, s 40(4), Sch 9, Pt 1, para 66(1), (2). Date in force: 1 October 2009: see SI 2009/1604, art 2(d). Sub-s (5): in para (c) words ―Courts Martial Appeal Court‖ in square brackets substituted by the Armed Forces Act 2006, s 378(1), Sch 16, para 156. Reproduced by permission of Reed Elsevier (UK) Limited trading as LexisNexis Date in force: 31 October 2009: see SI 2009/1167, art 4. Sub-s (5): para (f) inserted by the Mental Capacity Act 2005, s 67(1), Sch 6, para 43. Date in force: 1 October 2007: see SI 2007/1897, art 2(1)(d). Sub-s (5): in para (f) words ―Chancellor of the High Court‖ in square brackets substituted by the Crime and Courts Act 2013, s 21(4), Sch 14, Pt 3, para 5(5). Date in force: 1 October 2013: see SI 2013/2200, art 3(g). 5 Right of Crown to intervene (1) Where a court is considering whether to make a declaration of incompatibility, the Crown is entitled to notice in accordance with rules of court. (2) In any case to which subsection (1) applies— (a) a Minister of the Crown (or a person nominated by him), (b) a member of the Scottish Executive, (c) a Northern Ireland Minister, (d) a Northern Ireland department, is entitled, on giving notice in accordance with rules of court, to be joined as a party to the proceedings. (3) Notice under subsection (2) may be given at any time during the proceedings. (4) A person who has been made a party to criminal proceedings (other than in Scotland) as the result of a notice under subsection (2) may, with leave, appeal to the [Supreme Court] against any declaration of incompatibility made in the proceedings. (5) In subsection (4)— ―criminal proceedings‖ includes all proceedings before the [Court Martial Appeal Court]; and ―leave‖ means leave granted by the court making the declaration of incompatibility or by the [Supreme Court]. NOTES Initial Commencement To be appointed To be appointed: see s 22(3). Appointment Appointment: 2 October 2000: see SI 2000/1851, art 2. Reproduced by permission of Reed Elsevier (UK) Limited trading as LexisNexis Amendment Sub-s (4): words ―Supreme Court‖ in square brackets substituted by the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, s 40(4), Sch 9, Pt 1, para 66(1), (3).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Armed Forces Bill 2021 Summary
    Headline can be Armedon three Forces lines Bill 2021 Title Summary Sub-title or short context to document Armed Forces Bill 2021 – Summary Background Since the Bill of Rights 1688, the legislation making the provision necessary for the Armed Forces to exist as a disciplined force has been subject to regular renewal by an Act of Parliament. The next renewal is needed by the end of 2021. The primary purpose of these Acts is to provide for the continuation for a further period of up to five years of the legislation enabling the Armed Forces to be recruited and maintained as disciplined bodies; that legislation is the Armed Forces Act 2006.The 2006 Act introduced a single system of law and the Service Justice System that applies to all Service personnel wherever in the world they are operating. The 2006 Act was implemented in 2009, replacing three separate Service Discipline Acts that dated back to the 1950s. The 2006 Act continues to serve our Armed Forces well and subsequent Armed Forces Acts have brought the 2006 Act up to date for the contemporary needs of the Services. In 2017, in preparation for this Bill, MOD commissioned an independent review of the Service Justice System (SJS) to ensure that it continues to be transparent, fair and efficient. The review made 79 recommendations for improvement and the Bill includes provision to implement a few of these which require primary legislation. In common with other five-yearly Bills, this one contains a small number of proposals which fall outside the ambit of Service discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • Act of Sederunt (Simple Procedure) 2016 SSI 2016/200
    Act of Sederunt (Simple Procedure) 2016 SSI 2016/200 1. Citation and commencement, etc 2. The Simple Procedure Rules 3. Interpretation of the Simple Procedure Rules 4. Warrants 5. Arrestment to found jurisdiction Citation and commencement, etc 1. (1) This Act of Sederunt may be cited as the Act of Sederunt (Simple Procedure) 2016. (2) It comes into force on 28th November 2016. (3) A certified copy is to be inserted in the Books of Sederunt. The Simple Procedure Rules 2. (1) Schedule 1 contains rules for simple procedure cases and may be cited as the Simple Procedure Rules. (2) A form referred to in the Simple Procedure Rules means— (a) the form with that name in Schedule 2, or (b) an electronic version of the form with that name in Schedule 2, adapted for use by the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service with the portal on its website. (3) Where the Simple Procedure Rules require a form to be used, that form may be varied where the circumstances require it. Interpretation of the Simple Procedure Rules 3. (1) In the Simple Procedure Rules— “a case where the expenses of a claim are capped” means a simple procedure case— (a) to which an order made under section 81(1) of the Courts Reform (Scotland) Act 2014a applies; or (b) in which the sheriff has made a direction under section 81(7) of that Act; [omitted in consequentials] “a decision which absolves the respondent” means a decree of absolvitor; “a decision which orders the respondent to deliver something to the claimant” means a decree for delivery or for recovery of possession; “a decision
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Navy Police
    Royal Navy Police An inspection of the leadership of the Royal Navy Police in relation to its investigations July 2016 © HMIC 2016 ISBN: 978-1-78655-157-3 www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmic Contents Summary .................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 7 2. How effective is the overall strategic leadership and direction of the RNP, including the structures and mechanisms in support of these areas? .............. 10 What we were looking for ..................................................................................... 10 Findings ................................................................................................................ 10 3. How effective are the oversight, governance, monitoring and assessment arrangements within the RNP to ensure investigations are effective and kept free from improper interference? ........................................................................... 24 What we were looking for ..................................................................................... 24 Findings ................................................................................................................ 25 4. How well does the RNP use the National Intelligence Model in identifying strategic policing priorities that influence strategic planning and resourcing? 31 What we were looking for ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Act of Sederunt (Summary Applications, Statutory Applications and Appeals Etc
    SCOTTISH STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2019 No. 140 SHERIFF COURT Act of Sederunt (Summary Applications, Statutory Applications and Appeals etc. Rules Amendment) (Labour Market Enforcement Orders) 2019 Made - - - - 17th April 2019 Laid before the Scottish Parliament 18th April 2019 Coming into force - - 18th May 2019 In accordance with section 4 of the Scottish Civil Justice Council and Criminal Legal Assistance Act 2013( a), the Court of Session has approved draft rules submitted to it by the Scottish Civil Justice Council with such modifications as it thinks appropriate. The Court of Session therefore makes this Act of Sederunt under the powers conferred by section 104(1) of the Courts Reform (Scotland) Act 2014( b) and all other powers enabling it to do so. Citation and commencement, etc. 1. —(1) This Act of Sederunt may be cited as the Act of Sederunt (Summary Applications, Statutory Applications and Appeals etc. Rules Amendment) (Labour Market Enforcement Orders) 2019. (2) It comes into force on 18th May 2019. (3) A certified copy is to be inserted in the Books of Sederunt. Amendment of the Summary Application Rules 1999 2. —(1) The Act of Sederunt (Summary Applications, Statutory Applications and Appeals etc. Rules) 1999( c) is amended in accordance with this paragraph. (2) In Part XLIX (illegal working orders)( d)— (a) in the Part heading, after “WORKING” insert “AND LABOUR MARKET ENFORCEMENT”; (b) after rule 3.49.3 (applications for compensation) insert— (a) 2013 asp 3. Section 4 was amended by the Courts Reform (Scotland) Act 2014 (asp 18), schedule 5, paragraph 31(3), and by the Inquiries into Fatal Accidents and Sudden Deaths etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Armed Forces (Offences and Jurisdiction) (Jersey) Law 201
    STATES OF JERSEY r DRAFT ARMED FORCES (OFFENCES AND JURISDICTION) (JERSEY) LAW 201- Lodged au Greffe on 6th June 2017 by the Minister for Home Affairs STATES GREFFE 2017 P.51 DRAFT ARMED FORCES (OFFENCES AND JURISDICTION) (JERSEY) LAW 201- European Convention on Human Rights In accordance with the provisions of Article 16 of the Human Rights (Jersey) Law 2000, the Minister for Home Affairs has made the following statement – In the view of the Minister for Home Affairs, the provisions of the Draft Armed Forces (Offences and Jurisdiction) (Jersey) Law 201- are compatible with the Convention Rights. Signed: Deputy K.L. Moore of St. Peter Minister for Home Affairs Dated: 2nd June 2017 Page - 3 ◊ P.51/2017 REPORT The proposed Armed Forces (Offences and Jurisdiction) (Jersey) Law 201- (“the proposed Law”) makes provision for the treatment of British armed forces and those visiting from other countries when they are in Jersey, particularly in relation to discipline and justice. The proposed Law also establishes appropriate powers for the Jersey police and courts in relation to deserters and others, creates civilian offences in relation to the armed forces, protects the pay and equipment of the armed forces from action in Jersey courts, and enables the States Assembly by Regulations to amend legislation to provide for the use of vehicles and roads by the armed forces. Background The United Kingdom Visiting Forces Act 1952 was introduced in order to make provision with respect to naval, military and air forces of other countries visiting the United Kingdom, and to provide for the apprehension and disposal of deserters or absentees without leave in the United Kingdom from the forces of such countries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scottish Bar: the Evolution of the Faculty of Advocates in Its Historical Setting, 28 La
    Louisiana Law Review Volume 28 | Number 2 February 1968 The cottS ish Bar: The volutE ion of the Faculty of Advocates in Its Historical Setting Nan Wilson Repository Citation Nan Wilson, The Scottish Bar: The Evolution of the Faculty of Advocates in Its Historical Setting, 28 La. L. Rev. (1968) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol28/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SCOTTISH BAR: THE EVOLUTION OF THE FACULTY OF ADVOCATES IN ITS HISTORICAL SOCIAL SETTING Nan Wilson* Although the expression "advocate" is used in early Scottish statutes such as the Act of 1424, c. 45, which provided for legal aid to the indigent, the Faculty of Advocates as such dates from 1532 when the Court of Session was constituted as a College of Justice. Before this time, though friends of litigants could appear as unpaid amateurs, there had, of course, been professional lawyers, lay and ecclesiastical, variously described as "fore- speakers," procurators and prolocutors. The functions of advo- cate and solicitor had not yet been differentiated, though the notary had been for historical reasons. The law teacher was then essentially an ecclesiastic. As early as 1455, a distinctive costume (a green tabard) for pleaders was prescribed by Act of Parliament.' Between 1496 and 1501, at least a dozen pleaders can be identified as in extensive practice before the highest courts, and procurators appeared regularly in the Sheriff Courts.2 The position of notary also flourished in Scotland as on the Continent, though from 1469 the King asserted the exclusive right to appoint candidates for that branch of legal practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Sl/S4/11/3/A Subordinate Legislation
    SL/S4/11/3/A SUBORDINATE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE AGENDA 3rd Meeting, 2011 (Session 4) Tuesday 6 September 2011 The Committee will meet at 2.30 pm in Committee Room 6. 1. Instruments subject to affirmative procedure: The Committee will consider the following— Construction Contracts (Scotland) Exclusion Order 2011 [draft]; Scheme for Construction Contracts (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2011 [draft]; 2. Instruments subject to negative procedure: The Committee will consider the following— Plastic Kitchenware (Conditions on Imports from China) (Scotland) Regulations 2011 (SSI 2011/282); Pollution Prevention and Control (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2011 (SSI 2011/285); Local Government (Allowances and Expenses) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2011 (SSI 2011/304); Plant Health (Import Inspection Fees) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2011 (SSI 2011/311) 3. Instruments not subject to any Parliamentary procedure: The Committee will consider the following— Damages (Scotland) Act 2011 (Commencement, Transitional Provisions and Savings) Order 2011 (SSI 2011/268 (C.20)); Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009 (Commencement No. 1) (Scotland) Order 2011 (SSI 2011/269 (C. 21)); Private Rented Housing (Scotland) Act 2011 (Commencement No. 1 and Saving Provision) Order 2011 (SSI 2011/270 (C. 22); Local Electoral Administration (Scotland) Act 2011 (Commencement) Order 2011 (SSI 2011/277 (C. 23)); Public Services Reform (Scotland) Act 2011 (Commencement No. 5) Order 2011 (SSI 2011/278 (C.24)); SL/S4/11/3/A Wildlife and Natural Environment (Scotland) Act 2011 (Commencement No. 1) Order 2011 (SSI 2011/279 (C. 25)); Wildlife and Natural Environment (Scotland) Act 2011 (Commencement No. 1) Amendment Order 2011 (SSI 2011/287 (C. 26)); Act of Sederunt (Rules of the Court of Session Amendment No.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Armed Forces Personnel and the Legal Framework for Future Operations
    House of Commons Defence Committee UK Armed Forces Personnel and the Legal Framework for Future Operations Twelfth Report of Session 2013–14 Report, together with formal minutes and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 26 March 2013 HC 931 Published on 2 April 2013 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £17.50 The Defence Committee The Defence Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Ministry of Defence and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon James Arbuthnot MP (Conservative, North East Hampshire) (Chair) Mr Julian Brazier MP (Conservative, Canterbury) Rt Hon Jeffrey M. Donaldson MP (Democratic Unionist, Lagan Valley) Mr James Gray MP (Conservative, North Wiltshire) Mr Dai Havard MP (Labour, Merthyr Tydfil and Rhymney) Adam Holloway MP (Conservative, Gravesham) Mrs Madeleine Moon MP (Labour, Bridgend) Sir Bob Russell MP (Liberal Democrat, Colchester) Bob Stewart MP (Conservative, Beckenham) Ms Gisela Stuart MP (Labour, Birmingham, Edgbaston) Derek Twigg MP (Labour, Halton) John Woodcock MP (Labour/Co-op, Barrow and Furness) The following Members were also members of the Committee during this inquiry. Thomas Docherty MP (Labour, Dunfermline and West Fife) Penny Mordaunt MP (Conservative, Portsmouth North) Sandra Osborne MP (Labour, Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Applications, Statutory Applications and Appeals Etc. Rules) 1999
    Changes to legislation: There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to Act of Sederunt (Summary Applications, Statutory Applications and Appeals etc. Rules) 1999. Any changes that have already been made by the team appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) View outstanding changes STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 1999 No. 929 Act of Sederunt (Summary Applications, Statutory Applications and Appeals etc. Rules) 1999 PART XI REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE ACT 1983 Interpretation and application 3.—(1) In this Part– “sheriff clerk” means, except in rule 3.11.2, the sheriff clerk of the sheriff court district where the trial of the election petition is to take place; “the Act” means the Representation of the People Act 1983 F1. (2) This Part applies to election petitions under the Act. F1 1983 c.2. Initiation of proceedings 3.—(1) The election petition shall be lodged with the sheriff clerk of a sheriff court district within which the election questioned has taken place. (2) The sheriff clerk shall without delay transmit it to the sheriff principal who shall forthwith appoint– (a) the time and place for trial of the petition; (b) the amount of the security to be given by the petitioner; and (c) if he thinks fit, answers to be lodged within a specified time after service. (3) Service in terms of section 136(3) of the Act (security for costs) F2 shall be effected– (a) personally within– (i) 5 days; or (ii) such other period as the sheriff principal may appoint, of the giving of security; or (b) by first class recorded delivery post within– (i) 5 days; or (ii) such other period as the sheriff principal may appoint, of the giving of security.
    [Show full text]
  • OSP46: Records Relating to Military Law and Courts-Martial
    OPERATIONAL SELECTION POLICY OSP46 RECORDS RELATING TO MILITARY LAW AND COURTS-MARTIAL 1 10 January 2008. Contents Section Content Page 1 Authority 3 2 Scope 4 3 Origins of the Offices of the Judge Advocate 5 General and the Judge Advocate of the Fleet 4 Significant statutes in military law since 1955 6 5 Ministry of Defence military law functions 6 6 Army and Royal Air Force courts martial 9 7 Royal Navy courts martial 11 8 Ministry of Justice and predecessor bodies’ 13 military law functions 9 Jurisdiction of courts martial 14 10 Procedures in courts martial from 1990 to the 16 present 11 The National Archives current / past selection 16 policy and practice 12 Proposals for the future preservation at the 18 National Archives of public records relating to military law and courts martial 13 Implementation 23 Appendix Appendix 1 - Records relating to Military Law and Courts Martial selected by the National Archives to April 2007 2 1 Authority 1.1 The National Archives’ Acquisition and Disposition policy statements (February 2000) announced the intention of developing, in consultation with departments, operational selection policies across government. These policies would apply the collection themes described in the policy to the records of individual departments and agencies. 1.2 Operational selection policies are intended to be working tools for those involved in the selection of public records. This policy may, therefore, be reviewed and revised in the light of comments received from the users of the records or from archive professionals, the department’s experience of using the policy, or as a result of newly discovered information.
    [Show full text]
  • 1661-1700 (Pdf)
    1 Scottish Books 1661-1700 (Aldis updated) 1661 1682 Academiæ Edinburgenæ gratulatio, ob serenissimi, augustissimiq; monarchæ Caroli II . Britanniarum, Galliæ & Hiberniæ regis, fidei defensoris, in solium paternum restitutionem, oblate illustrissimo dynastæ, D. Johanni Middiltonio, Middiltonii comiti, clarimontis… 4to. Edinburgh: G. Lithgow, 1661. Wing E165; ESTC R11311 [Voyager 3150808] NLS holdings: Gray.1033(1); UMI 315:01; UMI 428:14 (identified as Wing M1972) Other locations: E U Leighton(fragment) *1682.3 [Act of Committee of Estates, 13 Aug. 1650] West-kirk the 13. day of August, 1650. The Commission of the Generall Assembly considering that there may be just ground of stumbling from the Kings Majesties refusing to subscribe & emit the Declaration offered unto him by the Committee of Estates, and Commissioners of the Generall Assembly concerning his former carriage and resolutions for the future, in reference to the cause of God … . s.sh. Edinburgh: E. Tyler, 1661. Reprint of 1650 edition, Aldis 1395.6 and 1395.7; not recorded by ESTC [Voyager 3771044] NLS holdings: MS.14493, fol.1 Other locations: 1682.5 Act for raising ... 480,000 pound. fol. Edinburgh: E. Tyler, 1661. NLS holdings: Other locations: Private Owner 1683 [Act of Parliament, 1 Feb. 1661] Act of Parliament, against saying of mess [sic], Jesuits, Seminary and Mess [sic] priests, and trafficking papists. At Edinburgh, the first day of February, 1661. s.sh. Edinburgh: E. Tyler, 1661. Wing S1119; Steele 2200; ESTC R183918 [Voyager 2231141] NLS holdings: Ry.1.1.33(13); Mf.SP.133(21); UMI 2710:22 Other locations: Signet Library 1684 [Act of Parliament, 20 Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 (C.15) Which Received Royal Assent on 19Th July 2007 TRIBUNALS, COURTS and ENFORCEMENT ACT 2007
    These notes refer to the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 (c.15) which received Royal Assent on 19th July 2007 TRIBUNALS, COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT ACT 2007 —————————— EXPLANATORY NOTES INTRODUCTION 1. These explanatory notes relate to the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 which received Royal Assent on 19th July 2007. They have been prepared by the Ministry of Justice in order to assist the reader of the Act. The explanatory notes have not been endorsed by Parliament. 2. The notes need to be read in conjunction with the Act. They are not, and are not meant to be, a comprehensive description of the Act. So where a section or part of a section does not seem to require any explanation or comment, none is given. Where a section makes a change to the system currently in place, an overview is given of that system followed by an explanation of the change that the Act makes. OVERVIEW 3. The Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act implements the main recommendations contained in the following reports and papers: x the White Paper, Transforming Public Services: Complaints, Redress and Tribunals,1 published in July 2004 (“Transforming Public Services”); x the consultation paper Increasing Diversity in the Judiciary, published in October 2004; x the Law Commission Report, Landlord and Tenant – Distress for Rent,2 published in February 1991 (“the Law Commission’s Report”); x a Report to the Lord Chancellor, Independent Review of Bailiff Law, by Professor J. Beatson QC published in July 2000; x a White Paper, Effective Enforcement, published in March 2003 (“Effective Enforcement”); x a consultation paper, A Choice of Paths: better options to manage over- indebtedness and multiple debt, published on 20 July 2004 (“the Choice of Paths Consultation”); x a consultation paper, Relief for the Indebted, an alternative to bankruptcy, published in March 2005; and x a consultation on providing immunity from seizure for international works of art on loan in the UK (March 2006).
    [Show full text]