If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. DEPARTMENT OF CORREC

ll;;'~ ....

m

FY 1991-1992 Al~AL REPORT STATE OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION FOURTH FLOOR, RACHEL JACKSON BUILDING· NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37243-0465

CHRISTI~E J. BRADLEY COMMISSIONER

February 26, 1993

The Honorable Ned McWherter and The (~eneral Assembly State "fTennessee

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Fiscal year] 99 J-92 was a year of continued growth and improvement for the Tennessee Department ofCorrect ton. Three new institutions opened. ThemanagementofSouth Central Correctional Center (SCCC) was awarded to Corrections Corporation of America, making SCCC the largest privately managed facility in the country. Tennessee State ))enitentiary and DeBerry Correctional Institute closed. Expansions to three institutions were approved.

The department received very favorable reports to the federal court relating to its Court Order of 1985. The reports praised the concentrdtion of effort and improvement.. by the State, General Assem bly, and the Department of Correction in meeting the requirements of the Order. The department ,s awaiting a final Order in the case.

The progress made in the Department of Correction over the last several years reflects the quality and dedication of its staff and the support of correctional programs and services by tbe Governor and General Assembly. Special recognition goes to Jeff Reynolds, who stepped down as commissioner in November 1992.

CJIJ:SCM:JW Tennessee Department of Correction

NCJRS

lAY 21 1993

~~CQUIS1TIONS

Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

142334 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice

This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions slated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or pOlicies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has been granted by Tenne~see Department of Corrections to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permission of the copyright owner.

Ned McWherter, Governor Christine J. Bradley, Commissioner

February 1993 , In Memory of Gary J. Livesay May 5, 1946 - June 9, 1992

Ort June 9, 1992, we all had to part, With a dear friend who touched our hearts. His job meant a lot to him, he worked extremely hard, And was always there when needed, he was never too tired. He cared about people and had a heart of gold, When a person did something good, they were always told. He was well-known and respected throughout the State, Kind and fair to all he met, having no hate. We can always look to him as one of our brighest stars, And strive to be like him, so we too will go far. - Donita Ford - - 'j' •• - "...... -... '. . . - .

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION

The.Tennessee Department of Correction's mission is to serve the public by managing offenders safely and securely according to recognized professional standards.

The Department will carry out its mission by:

.. Implementing the orders of sentencing courts in a safe and humane manner.

.. Employing qualified staff and providing opportunities for the training and development of employees as correctional professionals.

.. Developing and implementing a department-wide total quality improvement program which provides for the effective delivery of services and the efficient use of resources.

.. Providing offenders with opportunities and incentives for positive behavior change while providing sanctions and other disincentives for continued inappropriate behavior.

.. Cooperating with other agencies and organizations to help create an effective criminal justice system. mtlm rmmPfHT (J amtTl!Jf.

CoMilsi!ll!r'

f\j)lic IllI'crNtilll Offiar

IInI!b,j Ib.n1lin stm l'!nitBttiWIJ

c.iIr CcumJ Ibt~

IlIattnloqI CcM.nity Se'viCl! IAnt!r lm>:villl CooIIUli tv Sevitt IAnt!r

~ro.llIgilllll time. fleility

iIoriIIuot CaTtdilllll Cmtu

SoutIltasb!rn TN stm llIgilllll Came. he.

c;;/~ I--"/~ 93 !lri~ J. &-dllj, &~.i ..... Ilatt TabJe of Contents

Department Overview 1

Commissioner's Staff

Grubbs Litigation 5 Compliance 6 Internal Audit Section 7 Internal Affairs Section 8 Employee Grievance Section 8 Office of the General Counsel 9 Planning and Research 9

Administratiye Services

Budget 13 Correctional Enterprises 17 Engineering 17 Fiscal Services 17 Management Infonnation Services 18 Personnel 19 Tennessee Correction Academy 21

Adult Institutions

Classification Programs 25 Education 25 Food Services 27 Health Services 27 Mental Health Ser~ices 27 Substance Abuse Programs 27

East Tennessee Region

Brushy Mountain State Penltentiary 33 Caner County Work Camp 33 Chattanooga Community Service Center 34 Knoxville Community Service Center 34 Morgan County Regional Correctional Facility 35 Northeast Correctional Center 36 Southeastern Tennessee State Regional Correctional Facility 36 Table of Contents (Continued)

Middle TCImessee Region

DeBerry Conoectional Institute 41 Middle Tennessee Reception Center 41 Nashville Community Service Center 42 Riverbend Maximum Security Institution 42 South Central Correctional Center 43 Tennessee Prison for Women 43 Tennessee S tate Penitentiary 44 Tumey Center Industrial Prison 44

Lois M. DeBerry Special Needs Facility 45

Wcst Tennessee Region

Fort Pillow Prison and Pann 53 Lake County Regional Correctional Facility 53 Mark H. Luttrell Reception Center . 54 Northwest Correctional Center 54 Wayne County Boot Camp 55 West Tennessee High Security Facility 55

Community Services

Field Services 59 Community Corrections 63

Systemwide Statistics 69

Ujrectory

Slate Map 91 Staff Directory 92

Research Briefs and Publicatioos 101 Table of Illustrations

TDOC Offender PopuL'ltion 1 Felony lrunate Population 1983-1992 2 EmpJoyee Grievances 8 Expenditures By Division 13

Expenditure Summary 14 Analysis Of Unit Cost~ Of Service 15 Estimated Total. Cost Per Day Per Irunate 16 TDOC Personnel By Race And Sex 19

Adult Institution Security Positions 20 TDOC Personnel By Class 20 Cumulative School Enrollment 25 Vocational Graduates FY 1991-92 26

~ Irunate Population By Custody Level 28 Inmate Population vs. Capacity 29 TDOC Intake By County Of Conviction 30 Irunazes Incarcerated Over Ten Years 37

Irunate Deaths 45 Reported Assaults 46 Reported Assaults By Type 46, Escapes From TDOC Institutions By l.motitution 47

Escapes From TDOC Institutions By Month 47 Adult Incident Summary 48 Adult Probation Monthly Caseload FY 1983 - FY 1992 59 Adult Probation Monthly Caseload - By Region 60

Intensive Supervision Probation Caseload 60 Summary Of 1991-92 Adult Probation Activity 61 Swnm~ Of 1991-92 Intensive Fmbation Activity 62 Community Corrections Admissions 63

L-.__ •__ ~ ______,< ... ______--i Table of Illustrations (Continued)

Summary Of 1991-92 Conununity Corrections Activity 64 Community Corrections Admissions By Offense Category 65 Community Corrections Admissions By Age 65 Community Corrections Admissions By Sex And Race 66 LocaJ Jail Census 67

Systemwide Statistics

Felony Admissions By Type 71 Felony Admissions By Age 71 Admissions By County of Conviction By Jurisdiction 72 Felony Admissions By Race 74

Felony Admissions By Sex 74 Felony Admissions By Primary Offense Group 75 Felony Admissions - Average Total Sentence Length 76 Admissions By Total Sentence Length 77

Felony Inmate Population By Age 78 Felony Inmate Population By Race 78 Felony Imnate Population By Sex 79 Felony Imnate Population By Race/Sex 79

Felony Inmate PopUlation By Primary Offense Group 80 Felony Inmate Population - Average Total Sentence Length 81 Felony Releases By Type 82 Felony Releases By Age 82

Felony Releases By Sex 83 Felony Releases By Race 83 Felony Releases - Average Time Served 84 Felony Releases By Primary Offense Group 85

Felony Release Types By Primary Offense Group 86 Felony Releases - Average Time Served By Type of Release 87 Department Overview

0 The 998-bedSouth Central Correctional Cen- determine those habitual offenders who ter in Wayne County opened in March 1992. should be granted a release eligibility date The dcparunent contracted with Corrections comparable to the date provided for similar Corporation of America to manage this facil- offenses under the Sentencing Reform Actof ity. 1989. If the release eligibility date under the 1989 Act is earlier than thehabilual'scurrent 0 The 612-bed Lois M. DeBerry Special Needs date, the board is authorized to amend the Facility (DNSF) in Davidson County opened date. The board is also authorized to l:eview in June 1992. DSNF is the department's other categories of inmates convicted prior central health care and mental health treat- to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1989. The ment facility. board is appointed by the Commissioner and stafred by the department. 0 The 998-bed Northwest Correctional Center in Lake County opened in May 1992. 0 The department implemented anew, greatly expanded management information system 0 Tennessee State Penitentiary and DeBerry (TOMIS). Correctional Institute closed in June 1992. 0 The department filed a motion to terminate 0 338-bed expansions were approved for North- the federal court order in the Grubb.s. case. A east Correctional Center, South Central Cor- report submitted by the Special Master found rectional Center, and Northwest Correctional the department in substantial compliance Center. with the requirements of the Grubbs order. A hearing was held in May 1992 to discuss the 0 Legislation passed creating the Parole Eligi- remaining concerns in the case. The depart- bility Review Board to review the sentences ment is awaiting the final order from the of all offenders sentenced as an habitual of- federal judge. fender. The purpose of the review is to

~ ~

ISP-INTENSIVE SUPERVISION PROBATION CC-COMNUNITY CORRECTIONS l

1 Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

FELONY INMATE POPULATION END OF JUNE . 1983-1992 15000

14000

1.3000

12000

11000

10000

9000

8000

7000

6000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992

NOTE: TDOC INHOUSE PRIOR TO 1988 DOES NOT INCLUDE INMATES IN THE FOLLOWING COUNTS: FURLOUGH, OUT TO COURT, BOND, HOSPITAL, AND ESCAPE.

DATA FOR TDOC BACKUP AND LOCAL FELONS NOT COLLECTED DEFORE 1986.

2 Commissioner's Staff Commissioner's Staff

GrubbS Litigation defendant's motion for tennination of the case on or before April 15, 1992. Grubbs was filed as a class action suit in 1980, asserting that living conditions of inmates in A [mal hearing was scheduled for May Tennessee's then twelve state penal institutions 15, 1992, regarding (1) the respective violated Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment guar­ objections of the parties to the April 15, antees. ChiefJudge L. Clure Morton of the Middle 1992, report and recommendations of the District of Tennessee conducted a bench trial in Special Master and (2) any other matter November and December 1981. Judge Morton as directed by the court. found seven specific conditions in various institu­ tions that violated constitutional standards. He In its brief filed in February 1992, the department detemlined at that time, to appoint a special master stated, "As a result of the continuous efforts of the and required the department to submit plans for defendants to comply with the remedial measures remedying the unconstitutional conditions on a of the Court, this litigation has achieved its broad stricttimetable. Following Judge Morton's retire­ remedial purpose. Therefore, the remedial orders ment, Grubbs was assigned to District Judge Tho­ of the Court do not extend to all present and future mas A. Higgins, on whose docket it remains. TDOC adult penal facilities because the Court's orders are institution specific. In addition, the In September 1991, the department filed a motion pl~tiffs are not entitled to continuing injunctive along with a supporting brief requesting that the relief beyond June 30, 1992, in this case." remedial orders in this case be vacated and the jurisdiction of the Court be terminated on or before The plaintiff's brief stated, "Despite the progress June 30, 1992, asserting that the unconstitutional so painfully made over the past decade, the plain­ conditions of confmement found by the Court in tiffs still face serious threats to their constitutional 1982 had been remedied. In October the plaintiffs rights, as a result of the same factors the Court in the case filed a brief in response to the state's identified in 1982: motion to vacate, asserting that the defendants' motion was "without merit and should be denied." ... TDOC' s dilemma appears intractable. In the face of con­ In December 1991, after consultation among the stantly rising numbers of pris­ court, Special Master and the parties, the court oners and costs ofincarceration, found that a scheduling order was appropriate in problems over which the de­ light of the defendant's motion for termination. partment has no effective con­ The order was filed on December 17. 1991. and trol. increased appropriations are outlined the following requirements: needed just to maintain the sta­ tus quo. Yet the political cli­ Both parties were directed to submit briefs mate is such that the legislature by February 1, 1992. on th..: question of is reluctant to authorize sub­ law regarding (1) whether the ~ stantial increases in funding for remedial orders should extend to all adult TDOC at a time when other penal institutions under the TDOC, and program:;a."ebeingcut. TDOC's (2) the extent to which the plaintiffs are task is at best a formidable one. entitled to permanent injunctive relief on the conditions of confmement at issue in 552 F.Supp. at 1060. this case. A hearing was to be held 011 February 28,1992. The continuing intractability ofthis dilemmamakes permanent injunctive relief essential." The Special Master was directed to file any report and recommendations regard­ Prior to the special master submitting his report ing the Grubbs matrix resolution, the regarding the department's compliance with the remedial orders of the court, and the Court's orders, he filed an interim report, stating tl13t significant changes had been made in both the

5 Fiscal Year 1991.~2 Annual Report

"design" and "operational characteristics" of the fore the Court is how best to four regional prisons: Middle Tennessee Recep­ manage that disengagement. tion Center (MTRC), Morgan County Regional With the exception of popula­ Correctional Facility (MCRCF), Lake County Re­ tion growth and the specter of a gional Correctional Facility (LCRCF), and South­ return to prison overcrowding, eastern Tennessee State Regional Correctional the Special Master is persuaded Facility (STSRCF). The special master was refer­ that the state can be expected to ring to the construction of connectors between the manage its correctional system guilds at these institutions, the intent of which was responsibly and without the day to allow for a reduction in the number of officers to day scrutiny of the Court orits needed to supervise the guilds. officer."

During the prior fiscal year, the special master and However, the special master expressed concerns four court evaluators visited these institutions, as relating to the guild connectors and to the delivery well as Tumey Center Industrial Prison and Farm of adequate medical and mental health services. (TC). The purpose of these visits was to recom­ He recommended that the department not be en­ mend final population capacities at the regional tirely released from Court oversight until certain facilities and to respond to the state's motion to provisions are met in these areas. partially double cell the new housing units at TC. The special master recommended that the COUlt On May 15, 199£,ahearingwasheldduringwhich defer any final action establishing capacities at department officials testified on the anticipated these five institutions, pending review of the im­ impact of the guild connectors, the Special Needs pact of the modifications at the regional facilities. Facility, medical services, and overall conditions Thus far, the Court has deferred any final actions of confmement within the system. The results of in this matter, as recommended by the special this hearing are pending. master.

On April 30, 1992, the special master submitted Compljance his report to the Court In the report, the special master stated: The Compliance Section provides support and assistance to all divisions by ensuring that depart­ "There is no question that Ten­ mental practices adhere to constitutional and pro­ nessee has made extraordinary fessional standards, court recommendations, statu­ progress in resolving the issues tory laws, and 'IDOC policies. Historically, the which compelled the Court's Compliance Sectionhas been responsible for three intervention nearly a decade ago. major areas: Some relatively minor tasks re­ main to be accomplished, but 1. ~porting on the department's such will likely always be the level of compliance with the casein litigation which involves approximately 1,500 court vast, institutionalrefonn. More­ evaluator recommendations Wi­ over, once defendants have dem­ der the Grubbs lawsuit. onstrated both the ability and the will to manage their own 2. The coordination of the affairs within the bounds of the department's accreditation ac­ Constitution and their own sol­ tivities in all work locations in­ emn pledges to the Court, the volved in the process. role of the Court can and should diminish. 3. The coordination and oversight of the department's annual in­ Tennessee has reached such a spections of all institutions and point, and the question now be- field service operations.

6 Commissioner's Staff

Beginning in fiscal year 1992-93, the Compliance in August 1992 after completing the accredita­ Section will also be responsible for monitoring con­ tion audit in June 1992. tractcompIiancc of South Central Correctional Cen­ ter (SCCC). This institution is being managed by The institutions that passed reaccreditation au­ Corrections Corporation of American under tenns of dits during fiscal year 1991-92, included Carter a contract fmalized in March 1992. SCCC is being County Work Camp (January), Chattai'looga compared to Northeast Correctional Center (NECC) Community Service Center (November), Mark and Northwest Correctional Center (NWCC) for H. Luttrell Reception Center (September), and effectiveness and efficiency of operations. Tennessee Prison for Women (September). Carter County Work Camp was officially Court CompliancelProgram Evaluation. During the reaccredited in April, while the other three six month p.eriod ending December 31, 1991, visits institutions were all formally reaccredited in were made to seven institutions to monitor compli­ January 1992. ance with evaluator recommendations under the Grubbs lawsuit. In addition, one audit of inmate By the end of the fiscal year, the Department of employment was conducted, along with six follow­ Correctionhad 15 nationally accredited institu­ ups on previous audits of inmate employment. tions, with the 16th, Fort Pillow Prison and Farm, accredited in August 1992. In April 1992, in consultation with the special mas­ ter, the Compliance Report to the Special Masterwas One additional department institution fonnally completed, in anticipation of the June 30, 1992, entered the accreditation process during fiscal deadline for completion of the ~ mandates. year 1991-92, bringing the total number of This report analyzed the overall status of the major institutions involved in the accreditation pro­ operational areas of the department. The areas cess to 17. Northeast Correctional Center in included were: Classification, Education, Inmate Mountain City formally entered the accredita­ Employment, CET, Security, and Institutional Envi­ tion process in April, with a formal accreditation ronment. The area of Health Services was not audit expected during fiscal year 1992-93. addressed due to the ongoing review of the system by the special master and the anticipated impact the Annual Inspections. Annual inspections are Special Needs Facility will have on the system. This detailed observations and reports of the appear­ report was used by the special master in developing ance, physical condition, and overall operation his April 30 report to the Court. of each institution and field service program. These inspections are conducted by teams con­ Accreditation. During Fiscal Year 1991-92, five sisting of central office, institution, and field TDOC institutions passed their initial accreditation personnel. Reinspections, if necessary, are audits by the American Correctional Association scheduled and conducted within 90 days follow­ (ACA), and four others passed reaccreditation au­ ing the completion of the original inspection. dits. By the end of the fiscal year, all department During the past year, 17 institutions and nine institutions had completed the accreditation process regional probation offices were inspected. through the ACA, with the exception of the newest institutions. Internal Audit Those institutions completing their initial accredita­ tion audits include Brushy Mountain State Peniten­ Internal Audit is responsible for conducting all tiary (October), Fort Pillow Prison and Farm (June), fiscal audits within the Department of Correc­ Riverbend Maximum Security Institution (Febru­ tion as assigned by the commissioner. During ary), Turney Center Industrial Prison and Farm fiscal year 1991-92, Internal Audit completed (March),andWestTennesseeHighSecurityFacility commissary audits at all nine institutions be,ing (November). All of the above-mentioned institu­ accredited or re-accredited by ACA. Commis­ tions, with the exception of Fort Pillow Prison and sary audits are one of the mandatory standards Farm, were also fonnally accredited during fiscal for accreditation by ACA. Investigative audits year 1991-92. Fort Pillow was officially accredited assigned by the commissioner were also com-

7 -~------~----

Fiscal Year 1991·92 Annual Report

pie ted during this period of time. Major internal Employee Grieyance Section control deficiencies were discovered and recom­ mendation::: were made that will effect savings of The Employee Grievance Section is a resource for much time and money for the department. In the department employees with respect to correct latter part of the fiscal year, Internal Audit began procedures for resolving grievances and assists in a general audit of Northeast Correctional Center. establishing consistent actions. Classes for senior managers and pre-supervisors are conducted at the Tennessee Correction Academy. These classes Internal Affairs Section focus on civil service concepts and procedures for disciplinary and grievance actions. Monthly and The Internal Affairs Section conducts invesHga­ quarterly reports are distributed to assist in the tions specially authorized by the commissioner establishment of consistency by allowing person­ and are limited to matters relating to the operations nel to better monitor cases and provide feedback to of the department. Three investigative inquiries the field. were completed by Central Office Internal Affairs during the fiscal year and 61 investigative inquir­ During the fiscal year, a total of 103 grievances ies were completed by regional internal affairs was submitted. Of this number, 68 decisions were personnel. The principal types of investigative upheld, 9 decisions were overturned, and 14 were matters were drugs, staff misconduct, escapes and deemed nongrievable. A total of 12 were resol ved deaths in the adult institutions. The section con­ without a hearing. Over 98 percent of the griev­ tinued to work closely with various federal, state, ances were submitted by adult institutions' staff. and municipal and county investigative agencies. This resulted in the mutual sharing of intelligence infonnation, sharing of technical services, and infonnant development. A number of investiga­ tive matters were referred to attorney generals throughout the state for possible prosecution.

EXPI£Tfi:E GRJEVAN:::ES

FISCAL YEAR 1991-92

'l'OTAI. RESOINED GRIE.'I.1'AN::E lECISIW m::ISIW IIEE20IED WITHe",!' DIVISION SOBMI'l"l'ED UPHEID 0VER'mRNED ~ HEAP..ING

AmrB INSTITOTIWS 101 66 9 14 10

camDNITY SERVJ:CES 2 2 0 0 2

AanNIS'mATIVE SERVICES 0 0 0 0 0

rorAI. 103 68 9 14 12

WRI'l"lml WARNIUGS REVIEWED -57

8 Commissioner's Staff

OOice of the General CQunsel of General Counsel to assist in reconciling ap­ proximately 1,200 irrunediate problems arising The Office of General Counsel to the Corrunis­ from sentences which were either illegal or incom­ sioner represents the commissioner in legal and plete as submitted. Increasingly, the Office acted administrative proceedings where the deparunent as a facilitator on behalf of the department with is involved. The office assists the Office of the Federal and State judiciary, claims commission­ Attorney General, Civil Rights and Clain1s Sec­ ers, prosecutors offices as well as defense counsel. tion, in defending against the approxinlately 300 The Office continued to administer detainers and lawsuits filed annually by inmates in federal and to maintain files on inmates transferred under the state courts across the state. This process was Interstate Compact. complicated over the past eighteen months by a temporary declination of representation of some employees by the Office of the Attorney General. Planning and Research The department coordinated defense counsel across the state and developed procedures in writing for The Planning and Research Section provides in­ all levels of employees to follow. Further, the formation, analysis, and research to assist in im­ Office ao;;sists the Office of the Attorney General, proving the depanment 's management and opera­ Civil Litigations Section, in handling the appeals tion. The section responded to numerous inforn1a­ of employee grievances from the Civil Service tion requests from the General Assembly, federal Commission. court monitors, and other outside agencies. The section maintained reponing systems for institu­ The Office of the General Counsel oversees the tional incident repons, monthly felon populations development of depanmental policy, assists insti­ and movements, jail populations, and the drug tutions in local policy issues which may be unique treatment program. Special studies inFY 1991-92 to the facility, and implements the review of all included a revision of the probation initial risk policies on a regular basis. assessment scale, a study of the depanment' s use of minimum-restricted custody classification, and The Office of the General Counsel continued the a study of the diversionary effectiveness of com­ practice of teaching at the training academy and munity alternative programs in cooperation with going to the facilities to maintain communication East Tennessee State University. The section also with employees. A significant amount of time assisted in developing new dlita collections sys­ daily is devoted to fielding questions by telephone tems and in improving the reliability and accuracy when employees are concerned about the legal of existing data systems. The section produced implications of a situation. Each member of the this annual repon. A listing of other available Office led sessions at workshops involving records repons and Research Briefs produced by Planning and confidentiality, disciplinary and grievance and Research is included at the end of this repon. hearings. The TOMIS project called on the Office

9 Administrative Services Leon Joyner Assistant Commissioner Administrative Services

Budget dures as directed by the Departments of Finance and Administration and Personnel. Strict expendi­ ture controls were imposed statewide due to The budget section is responsible for coordinating undercollection of tax revenues. These controls the proper development, submission, and use of restricted commodity acquisition and required the the department's operating budget. Technical department to maintain evaluated position va­ assistance is provided to the field units in the cancy levels. The department reverted approxi­ development and management of the operating mately $2,500.000 as a result of FY 1991-92 budgfi!t. The budget section aJso monitors, re­ operations which represented only .85% of the vises, and authorizes expenditure of the department's allounent. deparunent' s operating funds and revenuecollec­ tions, prepares financial information and special During FY 1991-92, the budget section continued projects for the legislative branch including fiscal the process of phasing-down funding at Tennessee impact of proposed legislation from the General State Penitentiary and DeBerry Correctional Insti­ Ass~mbJy, monitors the closing capabilities of the tute in concurrence with the department's goal to department, and serves as liaison between the close both facilities by June 30, 1992. Additional wardens and directors of the department and funds were appropriated to begin operations at Finance and Administration's budget section. South Central Correctional Center, Northwest Cor­ rectional Center, and the Lois M. DeBerry Special During FY 1991-92, the budget section, in con­ Needs Facility during the last two quarters of FY junction with field and central office staff, oper­ 1991-92. ated under restricted hiring and purchasing proce-

EXPENDITURES BY DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92

• AD~INISTRATION IZIAOULT SERVICES

13 Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

EXPENDITURE SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 1991-92

ADULT COMMUNfIY EXPENDITURES BY OBJECT ADMIN1S1RA 110N SERVIL'ES SERVICES TOTAL

Regular Salaries $8,437,100 $80,048,500 $8,708,800 $97,194,400 Longevity 351,600 2,957,100 387,300 3,696,000 Overtime 165,800 5,184,900 50,700 5,401,400 Employee Benefits 2,037,700 21,863,900 2,123,900 26,025,500 Total Personal Services & Benefits $10,992,200 $110,054,400 $11,270,700 $132,317,300

Travel $662,800 $I,8U7,700 $436,800 $2,907,300 Printing. Duplicating & Binding 120,000 663,800 81,000 864,800 Utilities and Fuel 522,800 10,235,200 1,600 10,759,600 Connnunications 155,000 495,000 122,300 772,300 Maintenance. Repairs & Service 453,900 1,618,600 23,200 2,005,700 Professional Services & Dues 4,088,100 22.531,100 501,400 27,120,600 Supplies & Materials 1,671,900 20,874,800 160,200 22,706,900 Rentals and Insurance 880,800 1,854,900 986,700 3,722,400 Motor Vehicle Operations 200,200 371,500 500 572,200 Awanls and Indemnities 831,200 3,482,000 5,500 4,318,700 Grants and Subsidies 29,500 63,970,000 4,574,800 68,574,300 Unc1a:;sifierl 700 1,100 100 1,900 Stores for ResaIe/Reissue/Manufacture 3,974,900 4,328,000 0 8,302,900 Equipment 419,300 2,106,000 51,500 2,576,800 Buildings 254,100 13,100 0 201,200 Discounts Loot 0 (:00 0 600 Highway Ccnsttuction 0 1,100 0 1,100 Total Other Expenditures 14265200 134,354.500 6,945,600 155,565300

GRANDTUfAL $25.257,400 $244,408,900 $18,216,300 $287,882,600

RJNDING SOURCES

State Appropriation $12,950,300 $238,011,500 $18,082,200 $269,044,000 Fedeml 19,700 7,400 0 27,100 Counties 0 0 0 0 Cities O· 0 0 0 Non-Governmental 0 0 0 0 Current Services 1,640,900 5,266,200 134,100 7,041,200 Inter-Departmental 10,026,300 1,123,800 0 11,150,100 Reserves 620,200 0 0 620,200

PERSONNEL

FullTiJre 429 5,714 449 6,592 PartTiJre 13 0 0 13 Seasonal 0 0 0 0

Total 442 5,714 449 6,605

14 Administrative Services

ANALYSIS OF lINIT COSTS OF SERVICE FISCAL YEAR 1991·92

AVERAGE OCCliPANT FOOD CLOTIUNG DRlIG DAILY COST COSI' COSI' COST INSTITllTIO N COliNT PER DAY PER DAY PER YEAR PER YEAR

BRUSHY MOUNTAIN STATE PENITENTIARY 434 63.96 2.57 168.34 213.86

CARTER COUNTY WORK CAW.o.P 184 43.67 2.38 142.43 124.72

OIATTANOOGA COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER 106 48.89 2.02 148.00 136.79

DEBERRY CORRECTIONAL INSTITU1E 223 72.86 2.79 .. ..

DEBERRY SPECIAL NEEDS FACILITY 4 2,542.14 ......

FORT Pll..LOW PRISON AND FARM 642 47.42 2.66 123.60 145.87

KNOXVILLE COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER 134 44.81 2.60 85.28 100.00

LAKE COUNTY REGIONAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 710 40.20 2.78 60.01 105.83

MARK LUTTRELL RECEPrION CENTER 385 55.64 2.50 78.02 231.07

MIDDLE TENNESSEE RECEPTION CENTER 583 45.41 2.53 200.00 197.62

MORGAN COUNTY REGIONAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 794 40.31 230 66.37 180.73

NASHVILLE COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER 315 37.85 2.57 121.91 49.27

NORTHEAST CORRECTIONAL CENTER 934 37.90 3.04 140.00 194.00

NORTHWEST CORRECTIONAL CENTER 9 986.49 ......

RIVERBEND MAXIMUM SECURITY INSTITUTION 571 62.35 3.07 72.00 150.73

SOUTH CENTRAL CORRECTIONAL CENTER 173 78.56 .... •• .'"

SOUI'HEASTERN TENNESSEE STATE REGIONAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 795 40.74 2.27 116.00 221.25

TENNESSEE PRISON FOR WOMEN 343 61.62 2.28 159.00 153.42

TENNESSEE STATE PENITENTIARY 491 97.64 3.44 • .. ruRNEY CENTER INDUSlRIAL PRISON 689 50.43 2.54 74.00 176.00

WAYNE COUNTY BOOT CAMP 133 50.76 2.72 96.00 61.96

WEST TENNESSEE mGH SECURITY FACILITY 600 47.29 2.82 97.16 161.45

TOTAL 9,252 52.85 2.67

• INFORMATION NOT AVAILABLE; INSTITUTIONS HAVE CLOSED ... INFORMATION NOT APPLICABLE; INSTITUTIONS ARE PHASING IN OPERATIONS

15 Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

ACTUAL YEAR 1991-92

ESTIMA TED TOTAL COST PER DAY, PER INMATE FOR THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ADULT INSTITUTIONS

COST FACTORS

OPERATIONAL COST (1) $52.85

ADMINISTRATIVE COST 1.97

STATEWIDE COST ALLOCATION (INDIRECT COST) 0.14

CORRECTIONAL ENTERPRISES COST (2) 3.37

MAJOR MAINTENANCE COST 0.19

CAPITAL MAINTENANCE COST (3) 0.00

TRAINING ACADEMY COST 0.55

TOTAL COST PER DAY $59.07

(1) OPERATIONAL COST REFLECTS DIRECT EXPENDITURES FOR ALL

ADULT INSTITUTIONS

(2) REVENUe OFF-SET

(3) CAPITAL MAINTENANCE FUNDS ARE NOW APPROPRIATED DIRECTLY

TO THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION

CAPITAL PROJECT COST ALLOCATION FOR FY 91/92 $2.93

TOTAL COST INCLUDING CAPITAL $62.00

16 Administrative Services

CQrrectional Enterprises victim restitution and mandatory savingsare taken. It is CET's goal to continue to expand this alterna­ tive to traditional work programs seeking inten­ Correctional Entcrprises of TelUlcssee (CET), in sive work progrruns that are prcsently being sent conjunction with institutional wardens, manages out of the country by private companies. the overall operations of manufacturing and farm operations within TDOC. CET emphasizes edu­ cation by requiring an imnale to obtain aGED Em:ineerjng Certificate in order to be hired for a skilled posi tion to support these operations. Training is provided in speciiic manufacturing and fanning processes The Engineering Section forms an administrative to aU inmates and teaches realistic work habits that bridge between institutional managers and the are necessary for any job. architects, engineers, and contractors providing services to them. This section prepares mainte­ CET's 17 factories and 4 fanns produce high nance budgets, new construction programs, cost quality goods and services. Products produced proposals, and maintenance policy. Engineers through CET's programs are consistently moni­ review construction plans, specifications. and com­ tored to maintain quality, serviceability and com­ pleted work as well as investigate new building petitive prices. CET strives to meet and exceed sites. market demands and expectations while providing products and services to tax-supported agencies Construction projects, planned and funded in the and non-profit organizations. 1985 Special Legislative Session are complete. Two additional medium security prisons and a The fann operation includes a central garage special needs prison were completed in FY 1991- opcmtion. Two dairies have complete processing 92. Construction began in September 1992 on plants with half-pint cartoning, as well as bulk housing additions at Northeast, Northwest, and packaging. Last year's goal was reached to pro­ South Central Correctional Centers. These three vide two-percent milk along with whole milk. additions will be complete in late 1993 and will Plans are to expand into juices and chocolate milk. add 1,014 beds to our system.

CET fanns are also a source of training for senior veterinary students with the University ofTelUles­ Fiscal Services see. The university brings students to the fann to do health work. There is little other 0PP'4r£unity for students to treat large animals before graduat­ The Fiscal Services Section is responsible for ing as veterinarians. Correctional farms has pro­ continuing to improve the deparunent's financial vided livestock, ~taff and resources to do numer­ accountability through the state's Financial mteg­ ous research projects both with the University of rity Act. The section also assures prompt and TelUlessee Veterinary Teaching Hospital and the accurate payment of the deparunent's fmancial Agriculture Extension staff. obligations. Technical assistance is provided to the field operating units in developing and main­ CET broke from traditional industry programs in taining integrity in the financial management SySN FY 1991-92 when TDOC received federal ap­ tern. The section is the liaison between TDOC and proval to participate in the Private Sector/Prison the Deparunents of Finance and Administration Industry Enhancement Certification Program and General Services, Comptroller of the Trea­ (known as the PIE program). The PIE program sury, and several other state deparunents. allows CET to contract with private companies to produce goods for sale to markets outside state, During the fiscal year, the most significant activity city and local governments. Presently, CET em­ was the implementation of the Tennessee Of­ ploys approximately 50 inmates under a PIE con­ fender Management Infonnation System (TOMIS) tract. The inmates receive minimum wage from trust fund accounting program. This program which deductions for cost of incarceration, taxes, includes the processing of commissary sales as a

17 :Fiscal Year 1991·92 Annual Report

dircct update for the irunatc's trust fund. All units, count rooms, visitation areas, property rooms, facilities with ilUnate trust funds were converted clinics and commissaries. Probation and parole from the OBSCIS program to the TOMIS program officers also have them in their offices to manage on June 1. 1992. their caseload supervision.

The section continued its emphasis on the follow­ TOMIS maintains data in all major activities up implementation of actions included in the occurring in the correctional mllilagement process department's response to the latest audit report beginning with the Pre-Sentence Investigation issued by the Division of S tate Audit of the Office Report and cominuing through conviction and of the Comptroller of the Treasury. Also contin­ sentencing, incarceration, offender treatment, and ued was the expenditures reporting program that parole and probation management. was implemented to strengthen the department's oversight of fiscal activity. The easy retrieval of TOMIS data enables the entire corrections system to function more effi­ ciently. The need for written records with numer­ Mana"ement InformatioQ Services ous copies for all concerned has been greatly reduced.

Management Infonnation Services provides sen­ Sentence Management Services. Sentence Man­ tence management infonnation, computerized agement Services continued to provide training on infonnation reporting, technical assistance in the sentence computation and modification. Several design and development of computerized systems, SMS supervisors were assigned full time to the and fonns and publications service. The section TOMIS project where they provided technical calculates all felon sentences, maintains all inmate advice on the design and testing of the TOMIS records of offenders who have been in the system, sentencing menu. Another revision of the SMS and monitors the release dates for the Board of portion of the MIS Operational Procedures Hand­ Paroles in order to produce the parole dockets. book was undertaken to reflect the conversion to TOMIS. Technical assistance was provided to System Development Services. For more than sheriffs departments, particularly in the area of three years the Department of Correction has been reporting sentence reduction credits. working on a massive project to computerize the entire operation of the department's institutions Operational Surmort Services. Beginning in Janu­ and field offices. As a result of tIllS effort, on ary 1992 and continuing through the TOMIS February 3,1992, the department brought on-line conversion, Operational Support Services loaded what we believe to be the most comprehensive over 600 user group profiles. The user group computer system ever developed in the field of profile manages the security access to every con­ state corrections. the Tennessee Offender Man­ versation (transaction) in TOMIS. Including cor­ agement Infonnation System (TOMIS). rectional institutions, Board of Parole. Probation, Community Corrections, TEMA, and the Tennes­ The department manages more than 40,000 of­ see Sentencing Commission, there are in excess of fenders in correctional institutions, parole and 5,700users with access to various conversations in probation offices, and community corrections grant the TOMIS system. programs. TOMIS automates all infonnation about these offenders from the time of their con­ In addition to the TOMIS activities, Operational viction until they are released from all supervisory Support Services processed more than 10,000 authority. inquiries on offenders, more than 23,000 offender file folders were fihned, and over 192,000 pieces The equipment and network requirements for of mail were processed. TOMIS resulted in the jnstallation of more than 1,400 computer tenninals and printers throughout the state. In institutions, tenninals now reside on the desks of administrative personnel, in housing

18 Administrative Services

Personnel The DeBerry Special Needs Facilily was opened with a range of position classifications not previ­ ously used by the department. The establishment The Personnel Section monitors and provides of the Correctional Treatment Technician and the training for the personnel functions of the depart­ Correctional Treatment Technician Supervisor ment for compliance with civil service rules, state presented promotional opportunities for 185 em­ law, and policies and procedures. The section also ployees. monitors training, performance evaluations, and employee assistance programs to enhance em­ The Northwest Correctional Center opened during ployee effectiveness. The section developed and the fiscal year and presented challenges to back fill monitored the department's affmnative action and train large numbers of new employees as well plan. The unit continues to coordinate systems to as providing extensive promotional opportunities deal with the modified hiring freeze. for employees in the West Tennessee area.

The unit's major effort for FY 1991-92 was the The department began incremental steps toward placement of employees from the Tennessee State staffmg standards adopted during the fiscal year. Penitentiary and the DeBerry Correctional Insti~ lute as they closed. Over 600 employees were placed into other positions, with most having to come off civil service registers.

rooe PERSONNEL BY RACE AND SEX JUNE .30, 1992

MINORITY FEMALE 7.9%

MINORITY MALE 11.6"

WHITE MALE 57.2" WHITE FEMALE 23.3"

TOTAL PERSONNEL - 5,073

19 Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

ADULT INSTITUTION SECURITY POSITIONS JUNE 3D, 1992

2000

1500 o TOTAL l1li FILLED

1000

• INCLUDES ~IT MANAGERS. INt.lATE RELATIONS COORDINATORS. CORRECTIONAL CLERICAL OFFICERS

105 104 85 82 69 64- o SfJIGEANT UElmHANI' CAPTAIN UNT IIGT. * POSITION

TDOC PERSONNEL BY CLASS JUNE 3D, 1992

MAINTENANCE AOt.4INISTRA TION SKILLE02.S" 2.SlI: CLERICAL 3.1" 8.3" PROFESSIONAL 19.2lI:

PARA-PROFESSIONAL S.Oll:

TECHNICIAN 6.1:1:

20 Administrative Services

Tennessee Correction Academy provided 40 specialized and job-specific training programs. Such diverse offerings include Train the Trainer progranuning for Tennessee Offender The Tcnncssee Correction Academy's mission is Management Infonnation System (TO MIS) users, to establish, maintain, and promote professional Tactical Team Training, Crisis Simulation Pro­ standards through the provision of quality training gramming. Emergency Medical Technician Certi­ programs. Throughout the year, the Academy fication Training, and Hostage Negotiator Train­ continued its focus on employee skills enrichment ing. The Academy also became the first state programs and professional growth activities. correctional training center in the nation to be sanctioned as an independent Fireanns Instructor In order to achieve its mission for the department, Certification provider by the National Rifle Asso­ the Academy utilized a wide variety of means ciation. through which substantive training could be pro­ vided for 6,249 personnel. Academy instructors, 'The Training Advisory Committee. which ser~cd for example, developed nearly half the core cur­ as the Commissioner's chief mechanism for pro­ riculum courses which were delivered on-site at gram oversight and approval, provide creative institutions statewide. Also, 679 personnel were leadership and support essential to the Academ y' s trained by Academy instructors at 14 different efforts to offer innovative training options at re­ work-sites during the year. duced costs while still meeting accreditation stan­ dards. Academy-based training, in addition to its on­ going pre-service programs for new personnel,

21 Adult Institutions Charles Bass Assistant Commissioner Adult Institutions

ClassificatioD Programs ceed limits established by federal court mandate. This is accomplished by authorizing a<.lmissions of The Classification Section is responsible for the inmates to the department from county jails on a implementation and maintenance of the system of daily basis contingent upon the in-house popula­ managing the progression of inmates from intake tion count. Further, the section monitors and into TDOC custody through the period of incar­ approves, on the basis of population levels, inter­ ceration. institutional transfers of irunates.

The classification process evaluates infonnation concerning assessed needs of inmates to aid in Education making appropriate recommendations conceming programs and levels of supervision. A major The Education Section provides staff support to objective is to involve inmates in programs in the the department's institutional educational pro­ least restrictive setting consistent with the safety grams. These services include grant and entitle­ and protection of the public, TDOC staff and other ment program development and monitoring; cur­ inmates. Emphasis is given to custody, i.e., nec­ riculum frameworks and guides; technical assis­ essary levels of supervision as detennined from tance; liaison between the department and other the recency, severity and frequency of an agencies; and Career Ladder evaluation and pay­ individual's institutional conduct and offense con­ ment coordination. viction history. The process of evaluation occurs continually throughout an inmate's period of in­ Significant events during !he fiscal year include: carceration, and is managed at the institutional implementation of a new academic curriculum; level by correctional classification coordinators. expansion of the G.E.D. testing program; and reorganization of G.E.D. records. lnfornmtion from the inmate needs assessment process is collected and maintained for use in the The total number of irunates receiving some type inmate program and departmental planning pro­ of educational service increased from 7,735 in FY cess. 1990-91 to 7,919 during this fiscal year. The number of inmates that passed the G.E.D. in­ This section is also responsible for ensuring that creased from 382 in FY 1990-91 to 462 in FY institutional inmate population levels do not ex- 1991-92.

CUMULATIVE SCHOOL ENROLLMENT ADUL T INSTITUTIONS FY 1991-92 3000 2818 N Total Participants = 7.919 U t.425OO B E R 2072 2000 0 f"

: 1500 R T 61000 I P A N 500 T S 139 0 ABE/GEO ABE/GEO ABE/GEO VOL COLLEGE VOC VOL f"T PT SEG LIT EO NIGHT TYPE OF" TRAINING

25 VOCATIONAL GRADUATES FY 91·92 ~_. t:I.l n ~ INSTITUTION - DMSP LCRCF MLRC MTRC MCRCF NCSC RMSI STSRCF TPW TC WTHSF TOTAL I ~ ~ VOCATION .., i 1-1. AUTO MECHANICS 13 13 \0 1,,0 1-1. BARBERING 9 3 12 B \0 BUILDING TRADES 18 22 3 29 1 73 N CABINET MAKING/MILLWORK:S 7 2 9 > CLOTHING PRODUCTION *4 4 = COMMERCIAL CLEANING 4 20 10 34 =e:. COMMERCIAL FOODS 16 16 4 5 10 51 ~ ttl '0 CONSTRUCTION MAINT. TDS. 37 37 o.., COSMETOLOGY 8 6 14 ~ '""'" ELECTRICITY 14 14 GRAPHIC ARTS 16 16 . GREENHOUSE OPER. & MGT. 12 14 26 H.A.C. & R. 21 17 11 6 2 57 INTERIOR FINISH 16 5 21 LANDSCAPING 8 8 MASONRY 14 5 19 PLUMBING & P. F. 17 17 UPHOLSTRY 17 17 VOC. OFF. OCC. 28 6 4 38 WELDING 12 12

TOTALS 4 162 39 14 79 45 39 *23 54 28 5 492 "--- _._------* Does not include 57 inmates trained for CET sewing operation. Adult Institutions

Food Services Health services inspectors developed a reviewers handbook for inspectors to insure more consistent The Food Services Section coordinates the food SCOling on inspections. service operations in all the institutions. Advice and assistance are provided on operational matters such as sanitation, controlling food costs, and food Mental Health Services preparation. Compliance with TDOC policies and ACA standards is monitored by institutional visits Mental health services are made available to all and annual inspections. adult offenders incarcerated within the TDOC system. The director of mental health programs is During fiscal year 1991-92, over 10,946,000 meals responsible for monitoring and coordinating the were served in the department. The food expendi­ overall delivery of mental health services state­ ture included: $9,750,000 state funds and $515,774 wide. A series of mental health policies and ACA in U.S. Department of Agriculture commodities, standards govern the implementation of all mental for an average cost per day of $2.68. health services. Institutional visits and annual inspections promote continued compliance with Since mealtime is of considerable importance for established standards. inmates the annual food preference survey was conducted to help determine their preferences. The newly opened Lois DeBerry Special Needs The master menu was revised to reflect those Facility (DSNF) will serve as the nucleus for the preferences. The master menu is approved by a department's mental health care; 288 beds have registered dietitian and meets the nutritional re­ been designated exclusively for the provision of quirements for adults according to the recom­ mental health intervention. Additionally, 96 beds mended dietary allowances. have been allotted for the intensive treatment of adult sex offenders. All TDOC institutions will have access to various treatment components at Health Services DSNF.

The Health Services Section develops policies, provides guidance and assistance to institutional Substance Abuse PrQllramS health activities and monitors health services con­ tracts at affected institutions. The section also The purpose of the Substance Abuse Program is to consolidates department-wide health services sta­ provide drug involved offenders with an opportu­ tistical data, monitors admissions to private hospi­ nity to change past drug abusing behaviors by tals and coordinates the transfer of patients from providing access to treatment interventions de­ contract faciIi ties to DeBerry Special Needs Facil­ signed for varying levels of need and motivation. ity. The department received $984,000 in federal fund­ DeBerry Special NecdsFacility opened in August ing from the Bureau of Justice Assistance in fiscal 1992, coinciding with the closings at DCI and the year 1991-92for substance abuse treatment. Dur­ Tennessee State Penitentiary Health Center. ing 1991-92, a total of 1,600 offenders were accepted and received direct treatment services: In response to OSHA requirements for protecting 1,138 offenders in TDOC institutions and 562 employees from blood borne pathogens, an expo­ offenders on probation. Federal funds were also sure control plan was developed and designates used to develop other in-house institutional pro­ trainers from each institution were instructed on grams.. how to implement the plan. Because of the need to provide treatment services Health care personnel from each institution have to a heterogeneous population, a range of treat­ been selected to participate in the annual inspec­ ment services have been incorporated into the tion process. These inspections are recognized as substance abuse programs. Treatment services an integral part of the quality asSUT.'ance process. include: psychoeducational modules, drug educa-

27 Fiscal Year 1991 a 92 Annual Report

lion, outpatient and inpatient community services, Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics Anony­ therapeutic community. and structured self-help mous, as well as educational materials are also groups. A speciillized community supervision available to inmates. program was developed for Division X Criminal Court in Shelby County. About 235 received Federally-funded probation programs and their probation services through this court. average monthly census included:

Federally-funded institutional programs and their - 28-day inpatient treatment - 33 average monthly census included: - Aftercare services - 17 - 16-week outpatient treatment programs - 103 - 8-week educational program - 187 - Halfway house placements - 4 - 12-week Recovery Dynamics program - 35 - Educational programs - 20 - Therapeutic Community - 32 Federal funds were used for regional substance A transitional release program is available for abuse coordinators in the four largest metropolitan offenders released to community supervision in areas to direct offenders with substance abuse metropolitan count ies t oal are in need of continued problems to various department and community substance abuse treatment. Self-help programs, programs, including self-help programs.

INMATE POPULATION BY CUSTODY LEVEL June 30, 1992

28 Adult Institutions

INMATE POPULATION VS. CAPACITY AS OF JUNE.30, 1992

ASSIGNED DESIGNATED PERCENT lNSTIfUI10N POPULATION CAPACIIY CAPACITY

BRUSHY MOUNTAlN STATE PENITENTIARY 453 495 91.5

CARTER COUNTY WORK CAMP 193 210 91.9

CHATIANOOGA COl\1MUNITY SERVICE CEN1ER 123 120 102.5

DEBERRYSPEClALNEEDS FACllATY * 199 5SO 36.2

FORT PILWW PRISON AND FARM 6S8 700 94.0

KNOXVILLE COMMUNITY SERVICE CENfER 152 150 101.3 LAKE COUNTY REGIONAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 765 7IS 96.6

MARK LUTTRELL RECEPTION CENfER 395 411 98.1

MIDDLE TENNESSEE RECEPTION CENTER 51f7 594 98.8 MORGAN COUNI'Y REGIONAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY ms 791 102.1

NASHVILLE COMMUNITY SERVICE CENJ'ER 321 32S 98.8

NORTHEAST CORRECTIONAL CENTER 938 960 97.7

NORTH~TCORRECTIONALCENTER· 202 960 21.0

RIVERBEND MAXIMUM SECURIfY INSfITUTlON S82 574 10L4

SOUIH CENIRAL C0RRECl10NAL CENTER 963 960 100.3 SOUfHEASfERN TENNESSEE STATE REGIONAL CO~ONALFACllJTY fl)O 782 102.3

TENNESSEE PRISON FOR WOMEN 3SO 341 102.6

1lJRNI<..Y CENTER lNDUSfRIAL PRISON en 728 94.9

WAYNE COUNrY BOOr CAMP 146 150 97.3

WEST 1ENNESSEE IllGI-I SECURITY FACILITY 609 606 100.5

TOfAL

• Facilities opened in late 1991~92; not at operating capacity as of June 30.

29 Fiscal Year 1991·92 Annual Report

TDOC INTAKE BY COUNTY OF CONVICTION FY 1991·92

COUNTY ADMISSIONS COUNTY ADMISSIONs

ANDERSON 1.4% LAUDERDALE 0.9% BEDFORD 0.6% LAWRENCE 0.2% BENTON 0.5% LEWIS 0.1% BLEDSOE 0.2% LINCOLN 0.4% BLOUNT 1.2% LOUDON 0.2% BRADLEY 1.2% MACON 0.2% CAMPBELL 0.2% MADISON 3.5% CANNON 0.1% MARION 0.4% CARROLL O.lf% MARSHALL 0.6% CARTER 0.9% MAURY 1.0% CHEATHAM 0.2% MCMINN 0.7% CHESTER 0.2% MCNAIRY 0.0%

CLAIBORNE 0.1% MEIGS 0.0% CLAY 0.0% MONROE 0.4% COCKE 0.6% MONTGOMERY 0.9% COFFEE 1.0% MOORE 0.0% CROCKETT 0.2% MORGAN 0.1% CUMBERLAND 0.5% OBION 0.5% DAVIDSON 11.4% OVERTON 0.1% DECATUR 0.2% PERRY 0.0% DEKALB 0.2% PICKEIT 0.1% DICKSON 0.4% POLK 0.2% DYER 0.9% PUTNAM 0.3% FAYETTE 0.7% RHEA 0.3%

FENTRESS 0.2% ROANE 0.3% FRANKLIN 0.4% ROBERTSON 0.5% GIBSON 1.3% RUTHERFORD 1.0% GILES 0.3% SCOIT 0.2% GRAINGER 0.2% SEQUATCHIE 0.1% GREENE 0.6% S~VIER 0.6% GRUNDY 0.0% SHELBY 20.3% HAMBLEN 0.8% SMITH 0.1% HAMILTON 12.1% STEWART 0.1% HANCOCK 0.2% SULLIVAN 3.4% HARDEMAN 0.1% SUMNER 1.7% HARDIN 0.6% TIPTON 0.6%

HAWKINS 0.9% TROUSDALE 0.1% HAYWOOD 0.5% UNICOI 0.5% HENDERSON 0.5% UNION 0.1% HENRY 0.4% VANBUREN 0.0% HICKMAN 0.1% WARREN 0.2% HOUSTON 0.1% WASHINGTON 1.8% HUMPHREYS 0.3% WAYNE 0.0% JACKSON 0.2% WEAKLEY 0.5% JEFFERSON 0.3% WHITE 0.4% JOHNSON 0.1% WILLIAMSON 1.9% KNOX 9.0% WILSON 1.2% LAKE 0.1% COUNTY UNKNOWN 0.1%

30 East Tennessee Region

Regional Administrator· Linda Dodson, Acting

Brushy Mountain State Penitentiary Carter County Work Camp Chattanooga Community Service Center Knoxville Community Service Center Morgan County Regional Correctional Facility Northeast Correctional Center Southeastern Tennessee State Regional Correctional Facility Adult Institutions

Brushy Mountain State Penitentiary. Petros

Warden" Don Eberhart Opcned - 1896 Reopened - 1976 Designated Capacity - 495 Average Daily Population - 434 Security Designation - Maximum Accredited - Yes

Brushy Mountain State Penitentiary (BMSP) is the reception, classification and diagnostic center for East Tennessee. It was originally built as a time building facility. The facility has a maximum security designation.

Programs available at BMSP include G.E.D., and Adult Basic Education for pennanently assigned inmates, an industrial cleaning vocational program for minimum security inmates. and a pre-release program. Inmates are involved in support jobs at the facility and community service projects.

Carter County Work Camp - Roan Mountain

Warden - Harold Smith Opened - 1986 Designated Capacity - 210 Averagc Daily Population - 205 Security Designation - Minimum Accredited - Yes

Carter County Work Camp (CCWC) is based on the concept of working inmates in the community. This facility houses minimwn security inmates who are within ten years of their release eligibility date (RED).

Programs at the facility include G.E.D., Adult Basic Education and a literacy program. Additionally, substance abuse programs are provided.

Inmatc work crews assist federal, state and local government agencies as well as private and non-profit organizations in community service programs. Community service projects, including renovation and painting for schools and other facilities, helps inmates develop skills in carpentry, masonry, landscaping and other related trades. Major construction projects have been completed during this report period.

33 Fiscal Year 1991·92 Annual Report

Chattanooga Community Service Center· Chattanooga

Warden - John Patterson Opened - 1970 Dwsignated Capacity - 120 Average Daily Population - Male - 97, Female - 19 Security Designation - Minimum Accredited - Yes

Chattanooga Community Service Center (CCSC) houses minimum security male and female offenders within seven years of release with an emphasis on community service.

Prognuns available at the facility include G.E.D., Adult Basic Education, mental health programs, pre-release and individual counseling. The facility provides numerous state and local government agencies and community service agencies with skilled and unskilled labor, and inmates are also involved in support jobs at the facility.

Knoxville Community Service Center· Knoxville

Warden - Joe Fowler Opened - 1971 Designated Capacity - 150 Average Daily Population - 134 Security Designation - Minimum Accredited - Yes

Knoxville Community Service Center (KCSC) houses minimum security inmates who are within seven years of release with an emphasis on pre-release and community service. This facility does not accept sex offenders or offenders with detainers, and only accepts offenders with violent offenses who have been recommended for parole.

Programs available at KCSC include remedial reading, G.E.D., and Adult Basic Education on a voluntary basis, counseling and pre-release services, substance abuse education programs, alcoholics and narcotics anonymous groups, work and education release for eligible inmates, various religious activities, volunteer­ sponsored activities such as birthday parties and seasonal celebrations, community service projects, organized recreational programming both on and off compound and basic mental health and self-help services.

Inmates are initiall y assigned to supervised supponjobs and self-help programs through the indi vidual program plan. Subsequently. inmates may progress to community service assignments, passes/furloughs and finally, to pre-release status and parole.

34 Adult Institutions

Morgan County Regional Correctional Facility - Wartburg

Warden - David O. Mills Opened - 1980 Designated Capacity - 791 Average Daily Population -794 Security Designation - Medium/Minimwn Restricted Accredited - Yes

Morgan County Regional Correctional Facility (MCRCF) is a time building institution with a current security designation of minimum restricted, which also housed medium custody imnates for approximately half the year.

Educational programs include O.E.D .. AdulL Basic Education, special education and college courses by Lee College and Roane State Community College.

Vocational c1asse'1'; include commercial cleaning, commercial food service, building trades. upholstery, vocational office education (VOE), and heating, air conditioning, and refrigeration.

Industries include textiles and furniture refurbishing/manufacturing. Uniform belts and gun sheaths for all TDOC institutions are handicrafled at the MCRCF leather shop. Highly skilled leather crafters also produce leather goods for sale to the public through the MCRCF craft shop.

Inmates from MCRCF have been responsible for major construction projects in Morgan and surrounding counties. These included building Mossy Grove Church, constructing bleachers at Central High School in Wartburg, remodelling the fellowship hall at Childs Memorial Church in Harriman, completing construction on Mill Creek Church. building an addition on Mt. Cannel Church in Coalfield, constructing boat docks and painting sheds at Roane County Park, building an addition to the athletic building at Rockwood High School, and building campsites at Frozen Head State Park, Wartburg.

Inmates also provided valuable services to local communities, such as highway and eounty right-of-way clearing, trash pickup, cemetery mowing and cleanup, grave digging. church mainterumce, sehoot yard work. and have helped civic groups with landscaping projects and various other maintenance projects with have saved taxpayer dollars. The art shop makes signs and other items for community organizations. The building trades class recently made a special desk for a handicapped child in Nashville enabling her to attend school. The Straight Talk Program is presented to various community organizations upon request to supplement local programs for delinquent adolescents.

35 F.1scal Year 1991 ~92 Annual Report

Northeast Correctional Cen!er - Mountain City

Warden - Howard Carlton Opened - 1991 Designaated Capacity - 960 Average Daily Population - 934 Security Designation - Close Accredited - No

Northeast Correctional Center (NECC) opened in March 1991. NECC is a time building institution with a security designation of close. The majority of beds are medium security.

Academic programs include G.E.D. and Adult Basic Education. Vocational courses include building rrades, electricity, graphic art/silk screening and data processing.

Industries at the institution include a print plant and a data plant that employ approximately 75 inmates.

Southeastern Tennessee State Regional Correctional Facility - Pikeville

Warden - James Bowlen Opened - 1980 Designated Capacity - 782 Average Daily Population -795 Security Designation - Medium Accredited - Yes

Southeastern Tennessee State Regional Correctional Facility (STSRCF) is a time building institution with a medium security designation.

Academic programs include G.E.D. and Adult Basic Education. Six different vocational programs include industrial sewing/upholstery, food service, heating and air conditioning, building trades, interior fInish, and barbering.

An industrial sewing plant is located at the facility. Inmates also work on the fann and at the sawmill.

Community services include a construction crew which perfonns a variety of services in the community for government and charitable organizations and three Department of Transportation work crews.

36 Adult Institutions

INMATES INCARCERATED OVER TEN YEARS FISCAL YEAR 1991·92

AVERAGE NUMBER TIME PRIMARY OF SERVED OFFENSE OFFENDERS (yy/MM)

FIRST DEGREE MURDER 291 15/06 SECOND DEGREE MURDER 156 14/02 AGGRA VATED RAPE 83 12/00 AGGRAVATED KIDNAPPING 19 13/02 AGGRA VA TED ARSON 1 11/10 ATIEMPTED FIRST DEGREE MURDER 3 17/07 HABITUAL CRIMINAL 2 13/04

RAPE 83 16/00 AGGRAVATED ROBBERY 90 14/08 AGGRAVATED SEXUAL BATTERY 5 12/05 AGGRA VA TED ASSAl)1., T 9 13/05 KIDNAPPING 1 27/10

AGGRAVATED BURGLARY 12 14/07 BURGLARY . OTHER THAN HABITATION 9 14/07 THEFT OF PROPERTY ($1,000 . $10,000) 14 14/01 STATUTORY RAPE 1 10/11 THEFT OF PROPERTY ($500 - $1,000) 3 12/01 BURGLARY-AUTO 3 14/01 ATTEMPTED BURGLARY - OTHER THAN HABITATION 1 12/10

TOTAL OFFENDERS WITH 10 YEARS OR MORE CONTINUOUS SERVICE 786 14/08

37 ------

Middle Tennessee Region

Regional Administrator· Donal Campbell

DeBerry Correctional Institute Middle Tennessee Reception Center Nashville Community Service Center Riverbend Maximum Security Institution South Central Correctional Center Tennessee Prison For Women Tennessee State Penitentiary Turney Center Industrial Prison

Lois M. DeBerry Special Needs Facility Adult Institutions

DeBerry Correctional Institute· Nashville

Warden - David Russell, Acting Opened - 1977 Designated Capacity - 285 Average Daily Population - 223 Security Designation - Maximum Accredited - No

DeBerry Correctional Institute (DCI) was closed in June 1992. DCI housed male and female offenders inneed of mental health intervention and treatment, irunates with behavior problems, and male inmates participating in the sex offender treatment program. The program and services at DCI were transferred to the new Lois M. DeBerry Special Needs Facility in June 1992.

The facility has been transferred to the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County.

Middle Tennessee Reception Center· NashviUe

Warden - Jack Morgan Opened - 1979 Designated Capacity - 594 Average Daily Population - 583 Security Designation· Close Accredited· Yes

Middle Tennessee Reception Center (MlRC) is the reception, classification and diagnostic center for male felons committed from the Middle Tennessee area. The facility is designated as close security.

Educational programs available at the facility include G.E.D. and Adult Basic Education. A vocational program is available in ornamental horticulture, greenhouse operation and management. Irunatesare involved in support jobs at the facility.

41 Fiscal Year 1991·92 Annual Report

Nashville Community Service Center - Nashville

Warden - Jim Dickman Opened - 1936, Present Mission - 1970 Designated Capacity - 325 Average Daily Population - 315 Security Designation - Minimum Accredited - Yes

Nashville Community Service Center (NCSC) houses minimum security inmates within seven years of release with emphasis on community reintegration. NCSC is also designated as a pre-release center for inmates that have been recommended for parole and are within 90 days of release. Community volunteers assist in the pre­ release programming and have implemented a program entitled "Going For The Gold" which supplements the existing pre-release program.

Academic programs include G.E.D., Adult Basic Education and literacy programs. Vocational programs include food service and building trades, offered through Branell College. Some inmates are eligible to • participate in community colleges and universities. Substance abuse programming is available. Minimum community custody inmates work in the community and pay room and board fees. Inmates also work for oilier state departments in jobs, such as custodians and cooks, for the Departments of Safety, General Services and Military. Inmates are involved in support jobs at the facility. Restitution progrmnrning is also available.

Community service projects include janitorial and maintenance work for churches, schools, and other charitable organizations and setting-up booths and clean-up for several local festivals. Inmates participate in community recreational leagues, e.g. softball, basketball. The "Don't Follow Me" program is an inmate organization that speaks to schools, civic organizations, community groups to deter substance abuse and criminal activities.

Riverbend Maximum Security Institution - NashviUe

Warden - Michael Dutton Opened - 1989 Designated Capacity - 574 Average Daily Population - 571 Security Designation - Maximum Accredited - Yes

Riverbend Maximum Security Institution (RMSI) is a time building institution with a security designation of maximum. RMSI houses the state's Death Row inmate popUlation.

Educational programs include G.E.D. and Adult Basic Education. Vocational programs include printing, commercial cleaning, woodworking, and data processin,1. Industries include data entry and printing/quick print. Death Row inmates participate in the data entry industry, educational programs, and support services. Other inmates are involved ill support jobs at the facility.

42 Adult Institutions •

South Central Correctional Center - Clifton

Warden ~ John Ross Driskell Opened - March 1992 Designated Capacity - 960 Average Daily Population - N/A Security Designation - Close Accredited - No

SouLh Ce/llral Correctional Center (SCCC) opened in March 1992. SCCC is a time building institution with a security designation of close. SCCC is managed by Corrections Corporation of America, a private corrections management fInn. The majority of beds are medium security.

Academic programs include G.E.D. and Adult Basic Education. An irunate tutor program has been established.

Vocational programs include building trades repair and maintenance, and computer operations.

Community service projects include construction of a sign and groundwork at Clifton Airport, reroofmg a school, litter pickup, and providing free fIrewood through the Clifton Senior Citizens Center.

Tennessee Prison for Women - Nashville

Warden - Penny Bemhardt Opened - 1898, Present Facility - 1966 (Female unit established 1906) Designated Capacity - 341 Average Daily Population - 343 Security Designation ~ Maximwn Accredited - Yes

Termessee Prison for Women (TPW) is the reception, classifIcation, diagnostic center and time building institution for state sentenced female felons. The security designation is maximum.

Academic pmgrams include G.E.D., Adult Basic Education, special education and college courses offered Ihrough American Baptist College. Vocational programs include culinary arts, cosmetology, vocational office education. and building maintenance trades. Industries located at TPW are a unifonn plant and a customer service center. Eligible irunates may work in the community on work release, community beautification/clean up crew on 1-440 and in other state agencies. Inmates are involved in support jobs at the facility.

Currently, the building previously used as the administration building is undergoing renovation which will house the medical unit, some administrative functions and expand the indoor visitation area.

43 'Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

Tennessee State Penitentiary - Nashville

Warden - Alton Hesson, Acting Opened - 1898 Designated Capacity - 900 Average Daily Population - 491 Security Designation - Medimn Accredited - No

Tennessee State Penitentiary (TSP) closed in June 1992. TSP housed medium security inmates and inmates temporarily assigned for medical and court appearance reasons. TSP's central health care and pharmacy services transferred to the Lois M. DeBerry Special Needs Facility upon the closing of the institution.

Turney Center Industrial Prison and Farm - Only

Warden - Jim Rose Opened - 1971 Designated Capacity - 728 Average Daily Population - 689 Security Designation- Clos(~ Accredited - Yes

Tumey Center (TC) is a time building institution with emphasis on industry. The security designation is close. The majority of beds are medium security.

Academic programs available at the facility include G.E.D. and Adult Basic Education. VocationaJ programs include cosmetology, cabinet making and mill work, industrial maintenance, landscaping, vocational office education and commercial food services. Industry programs are woodwork shop. metal plant. sign plant and paint plant. The fann operation includes raising crops for feeder cattle. TC also operates a sawmill which produces stakes for the Department of Transportation and other projects. Inmates are involved in support jobs at the facility.

Inmate work crews completed numerous community service projects, some of which are the construction of a sidewalk through the Centerville City Park, construction of a bathroom at the Humphreys County Soil Conservation office, painting and repairing schools throughout Hickman County School System, constructing a playground at the Highland Rim Head Start School for the Humphreys County School System. painting and cleaning the Senior Citizen Building in Perry County, remodelling the Humphreys County Courthouse and constructing two pumping stations for the City of Centerville.

44 Adult Institutions

Lois M. DeBerry Special Needs Facility ~ Nashville

Warden - Christine J. Bradley Opened - June 1992 Designated Capacity - 562 Average Daily Population - N/A Security Designation - Maximum Accredited - No

The Lois M. DeBerry Special Needs Facility (DSNF) opened in June 1992. DSNF is the central health and mental health care treatment and referral center for the department. Twenty-seven percent of the beds are for health care, 63 percent for mental health, and 10 percent for support workers. Thirty-two beds are designated for women. The Health Center provides a full range of specialty diagnostic and treatment services in support of the department. DSNF includes an intensive residential sex offender treatment program. The department's central pharmacy is located outside this facility.

INMA TE DEATHS TOOe INSTITUTIONS FY 1991-92

HOMICIDE 11" SUICIDE 7"

NATURAL/ILLNESS 82" N = 28

45 :Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

REPORTED ASSAULTS FY 1991-92 (TOTAL INMATE ON INMATE = 68 & TOTAL INMATE ON STAFF = 65)

18 5 o I~ATE ON STAFF 16 7 12 Itt.tATE ON Itt.tATE N 7 U 104 8 5 6 12 '"E 12 R 0 f 10 I 8 N C ~ II E ~ 4 5 2

AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC .IIoH

REPORTED ASSAULTS BY TYPE BY INMATES ON STAFF OR OTHER INMATES FY 1991-92

STABBING 17 1J'I:

46 Adult Institutions

ESCAPES FROM ADULT INSTITUTIONS BY INSTITUTION FY 1991-92 40

N 35 U 32 M B 30 E Totol ~s = 109 Sean penmeter - 2 R 25 0 F 20

SE 15+------~r~------~h------C pA 10+-~r_------~*------~ r------­ E S 5

ESCAPES FROM ADULT INSTITUTIONS BY MONTH 199'1-92 N U 14~------~~------M B '2~------~~------~ E R 10~~------v r---~~~ r------V o 8 F 6 E 5 C A P 2 E 5 JUL AJJG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY ~

47 Fiscal Year t 991·92 Annual Report

ADULT INCIDENT SUMMARY

FY1991·92 FY 1990·91 IN<..... IJ)ENT QUARTER 1 QUARTER 2 QUARTER 3 QUARTER 4 TOTAL TOTAL

ACCIDENTAL INJURY INMATE 21 :xl 34 22 97 149 srAFF 10 8 12 IS 45 62 VISITOR 2 0 I 4 13

ASSAUL T·lNMAlE ON INMA 1E curIlNGf.)TABBlNG 2 4 2 8 16 25 AGIITJPHYSICAL ABUSE 18 10 5 14 47 66 AREARM 0 0 0 0 0 0 SEXUAL 0 0 0 I 0TIffiR WEAPON 2 0 4 5

ASSAULT·INMAlEONSTAFF ClJITlNG/STABBlNG 0 0 0 I I AGlITJPHYSlCAL ABUSE 16 15 16 12 59 50 AREARM 0 0 0 0 0 0 SEXUAL 0 0 0 0 0 OTI-JE{ WEAPON 2 0 1 2 5 5

ASSAULT·INMA lEON VISITOR 0 0 2 0

OCAlH lNMA lE-nOMlCIDE 2 0 1 0 3 2 lNMAlE-NA11JRAL 8 5 5 5 23 30 lNMAlBSmCIDE 0 0 2 4 INMAlE-0lHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 srAFF 1 4 1 VISITOR 0 0 0 0 0 0

ESCAPE ATIEMPf 0 3 8 FAILURE TO RImJRN FROM FURLOUGH 8 14 15 5 42 39 SECURESUFERVISION 0 0 0 2 2 5 WALKAWAY FROM MINIMUM SECURITY 10 7 6 13 36 33 WORK DETAIL-MINIMUM 3 1 2 8 14 8 WORK PASS-MINIMUM 5 4 3 3 15 Zl

48 Adult Institutions

ADULT INCIDENT SUMMARY

FY1991·92 FY 1990·91 INCIDENT QUARTER 1 QUARThtt 2 QUARTER 3 QUARTER 4 TOTAL TOTAL

INMA'!E DEHA VlOR DJS11JRBANCE 0 2 2 4 8 1 HOSTAGEsnuAnoN 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIOT 0 0 0 0 0 0

SELF-INFLICTED INJURY SFLF MU1ILA nON/ SELF·1NFLlcrnD INJURY 13 11 4 7 35 88 SUICIDE ATlliMPI' 6 6 8 9 '19 41

INMAlE 1RANSfER ADMINlSlRATIVE 7 7 9 6 '19 41 MEDICAL 2 3 0 5 10 50

USEOFFORCE DISOIARGE OFFIREARM I 0 3 7 MACE 0 0 2 0 PHYSICAL RrS1RAINT 12 12 8 12 44 101 TASER 3 2 3 4 12 Zl

CJIHER EMPLOYEE ARREST 4 12 lNMA1E ARRESI' 2 2 2 2 8 8 ~nONSDJSRUPTION 36 42 28 42 148 125 fROffiR1Y DAMAGE 17 5 9 17 48 ff) USE OF DOG 1EAM 11 15 5 7 38 51 USE OF lNMAlES IN EMERGENCY 2 10 9 2 23 17 INMAlE ILLNESS 17 23 12 17 ff) 103 VISITOR ARRF.ST 1 0 2 4 7 7 01HIiR 25 15 17 21 78 138

1UTAL 267 250 228 TIS 1,020 1,421

49 I i I West Tennessee Region

Regional Administrator· Billy McWherter

Fort Pillow Prison and Farm Lake County Regional Correctional Facility Mark H. Luttrell Reception Center Northwest Correctional Center Wayne County Boot Camp West Tennessee High Security Facility ------~- --

Adult Institutions E

Fort I)illow Prison and Farm - Henning

Warden - Fred Raney Opened - 1938 Designated Capacity - 700 Average Daily Population - 642 Security Designation - Medium Accredited - Yes

Fort Pillow Prison and Farm (FP) is a time building institution W1Lh a security designation of medium. Producing agricultural products is one of the main functions of the facility.

Academic programs include G.E.D. and Adult Basic Education. Vocational programs include masonry and building trades. The work emphasis is mainly agricultural. The facility also manufactures the motor vehicle plates for the state. Agriculture products include dairy, beef, field and truck crops, such as vegetables, com, soybeans, wheat, and timbel'. Inmates are involved ill support jobs at the facility.

Community service projects include construction of baseball fields and cleaning numerous cemeteries.

Lake County Regional Correctional Facility - Tiptonville

Warden - Robert Conley Opened - 1981 Designated Capacity - 715 Average Daily Population -710 Security Designation - Medium Accredited - Yes

Lake County Regional Correctional Facility (LCRCF) is a time building institution with special emphasis on education programs. The security designation is medium but changed to house minimum- restricted inmates during the year.

Educational programs include G.E.D., Adult Basic Education, special education, and vocational education. Vocational training is offered in cabinet making and mill work; painting and interior finisb; electrical wiring; masonry; automotive mechanics; welding; barbering; conunercial food services; horticulture; plumbing; advanced building trades; and heating, air conditioning, and refrigeration. Postsecondary programs are also available to qualified offenders through the University ofTennessee at Martin. lP.mates are involved in support jobs at the facility.

Conununity service projects included renovation and painting for schools and other local facilities and construction and renovation projects for other state departments.

53 Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

Mark H. Luttrell Reception Center - Memphis

Warden - Bruce MacDonald Opcned - 1974 Designated Capacity - 411 Average Daily Population - 385 Security Designation - Close Accredited - Yes

Mark Luttrell Reception Center (MLRC) is the reception, classification, and diagnostic center for male felons committed from the West Terulessee area. The facility is designated as close security.

Educational programs include G.E.D., Adult Basic Education, and college courses by Shelby State Community College. Burnell College provides vocational programs in airconditioning and refrigeration, and building trades. Christian Brothers University administers a pre-release program. Inmates are involved in support jobs at the facility.

Community service projects included adopting Corry Junior High through the Memphis "Adopt-A-SchooI" program; meeting with over 4,000 young people in over 100 sessions to hopefully deter youths from coming to prison; and state park clean-up.

Northwest Correctional Center· Tiptonville

Warden - Charles Noles Opened - May 1992 Designated Capacity - 960 Average Daily Population - N/A Security Designation - Close Accredited - No

Northwest Correctional Center (NWCq opened in May 1992. This time building facility has a security designation of close. The majority of beds are medium security.

E

54 Adult Institutions £

Wayne County Boot Camp - CUfton

Warden - Malcolm Davis Opencd - 1985 (Convcrled to Bool Camp - 1989) Desigmlled Capacity - 150 Averagc Daily Population - 133 Security Designalion "- Medium Accredited - Yes

In December 1989 Lhe Wayne County Work Camp was reorganized as a Special Alternative Incarceration Unit, conunollly referred to as Lhe "Boot Camp:' The boot camp program is a highly disciplined military style training program combined with various treatment programs. Eligible offenders are under 35 years of age. and convicted of non-violent crimes with sentences of 6 years or less (longer for most drug offenses). The program is operated a<; minimum security.

Military training consists of drill and ceremony. physical training. and respect for auLhority. Available treatment programs include Adult Basic Education. Horizons Plus program, self-esteem. substance abuse, and pre-release. Inmates are involved in support jobs at the facility. Inmates participate in the boot camp program between 90 and 120 days. Upon successfully completing Lhe program, inmates are released to probation supervision.

Community service projects included cleaning cemeteries and constructing school playground equipment.

West Tt~nnessee Higb Security Facility - Henning

Warden - Billy Compton Opened - 1990 Designated Capacity - 606 Average Daily Population - 600 Security Designation - Maximum Accredited - Yes

West Tennessee High Security Facility (WTHSF) opened in January 1990. The facility is a time building institution with a security designation of maximum.

Educational programs available include G.E.D. and Adult Basic Education. Vocational programs include sewing, woodworking, masonry, and upholstery. The facility includes textile and wood refurbishing plants.

55 Community Services Carey Rogers Assistant Commissioner Community, Services

Fjeld Servjces program from the local jails and facilities. Upon completion of the boot camp program, the proba­ tion staff is responsible for supervising the suc­ The purpose of the field services section is to cessfully released offender. During FY 1991-92, effectively supervise and investigate the conduct a total 350 offenders were successfully released to of persons placed 011 probation and referred to the probation supervision. department by the courts. Pre-sentence investiga­ tions and evaluations arc provided to criminal and The Field Services section supervised an average circuit courts. Other investigative reports include of 18.808 probationers in fiscal year 1991·92. post-sentence, classification and interstate com· Probation services are provided to all judicial pact reports. The section also has the responsibil· districts in the state. A total of $1,576.496 was ity of collection of criminal injuries compensa­ collected during the fiscal year for the Criminal tion, supervision and diversion fees from all eli­ Injuries Compensation Fund; $370,475 was col­ gible offenders. A Work Projects Program and an lected in Pre-Trial Diversion fees. Over 219,000 Intensive Supervision Progf'cU11 are administered hours of community service work were perfonned by the section. In addition, the division operates by 2323 probationers in the Work Projects Pro­ specialized probation services for the Shelby gram. County Criminal Court, Division X (Drug Court). An emphasis on identification and treatment for The Intensive Supervision program supervised an offenders for substance abuse related problems is average of 1,111 cases per month during the fiscal the primary goal of this specialized unit. year and utilized both electronic monitoring and intennittent drug testing to provide intensifi.ed The section is also responsible for screening eli­ services. The cost of supervision for an offender gible participants for the department' s boot camp in FY 1991·92 was $3.96.

ADULT PROBATION MONTHLY CASELOAD FY 1983 - FY 1992 20000 19,433 19000

18000 N ~ 17000 16,656 16,728 Y B ./ E _./ 16,609 R 16000 o f 15000 15,862 C A S~.woo ./ ./ 14,422 E 13.581 - s 12,500 13,623 - JI.JoIE 30 CASELOAD 13000 - /' ...AVERAGE MONTHLY /' 13,160-- CASELOAD 12000 11.802

l1ooo+-----~----~~----+_----~----_4------r_----~----_+----~ 82-83 83-84 84-85 85-86 86-87 87-88 88-89 89-90 90-91 91-92 YEAR

59 Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

ADULT PROBATION MONTHLY CASE LOAD BY REGION FY 1991-92 6000

lSI JUNE 30 1992 CASELOAO= 18,808 5085 5000 o AVERAGE MONTHLY N CASELOAD= 18,890 U ~ 4000 E R 03000 F C ~ 2000 E S 1000

fllST SOUTH If'PER SOUTH MID ct.t.I- NORTH SOUTH DELTA TEIII EAST WoIlERLANl CENTRAL BERLANl WEST WEST

INTENSIVE SUPERVISION PROBATION CASELOAD FY 1991-92 1400

124-2 1245 1201 1191 !.lAy 1200 114-4- 1169 MAR APR DEC JAN FEB 97 ~1000 961 962 967 t.I 8 .AlL AUG SEP OCT E R 800 o AVERAGE MONTHLY INTENSIVE 0 PROBATION F CASELOAO BY 600 REGION C A ~ 1991-92 INTENSIVE S PROBATION E 400 368 ADMISSIONS S 305 BY REGION -INTENSIVE 200 PROBATION CASELOAD BY t.tONTH

0 fRST TN EAST TN S. EAST S. carr. IoID-cLUI. N. WEST S. WEST DELTA

60 Community Services

SUMMARY OF 1991-92 ADULT PROBATION ACTIVITY

PROGRAM ACTIVITY NUMB@:]

CASES REFERRED FOR PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATIONS 7.574 PRESENTENCE REPORTS COMPLETED 6,583 POSTSENTENCE REPORTS COMPLETED 4.083 DIVERSION REPORTS COMPLETED 388 INTERSTATE COMPACT REPORTS COMPLETED 3,105 SPECIFIC DATA REPORTS COMPLETED 3,319 CLASSIFICATION REPORTS COMPLETED 2,382

FORMAL COURT APPEARANCES ON PROBATION MA TIERS 18,050 HOME CONTACTS WITH PROBATIONER OR FAMILY 14,898 EMPLOYER CONTACTS 18.974 TENNESSEE PROBATIONERS UNEMPLOYED 5,970 ... CONTACTS WITH POUCE AGENCIES 38.512 REFERRALS TO OTHER SERVICE AGENCIES 12.154

CONTACTS WITH OTHER SERVICS AGENCIES 11,987 PROBATIONERS REVOKED 1,867 VIOLATION REPORTS COMPLETED 7,936 TENNESSEE PROBATIONERS UNDER SUPERVISION 16,260 ... ISC CASES UNDER SUPERVISION 1,930 ...

DIVERSION CASES lINDER SUPERVISION 30 ... CASES UNDER SUPERVISION (END OF YEAR) 18,890 ... PROBATIONERS REFERRED FOR WORK PROJECTS 2.313 PROBATIONERS PARTICIPATING IN WORK PROJECTS IS.385 ... NUMBER OF COMMUNITY SERVICE HOURS COMPLETED 219.321

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITY

HOURS IN TRAINING ACTIVITIES 12.901 MILES TRAVELED ON JOB 637,487

FEE COLLECTION ACTIVITY

NUMBER OF TENNESSEE PROBATION CASES 18.890 ... NUMBER OF EUGffiLE CASES 10,060 ... NUMBER VIOLATED FOR NON-PAYMENT 1.690 NUMBER CURRENT 6,450 PERCENTAGE OF CASES CURRENT 64 NUMBER REVOKED 1.345

FEES COLLECTED CRIMINAL INJURIES $1.072,602 SUPERVISION 370,475 PRE-TRIAL DIVERSION 133,419

TOTAL FEES $1,576,496

DRUG TESTING ACTIVITY

NUMBER OF DRUG SCREENS (FIELD) 4,424 NUMBER OF DRUG TESTS (LAB ORA TORy) 854 NUMBER OF POSmVE DRUG TESTS 774

... MONTHLY AVERAGES

61 Fiscal Year 1991·92 Annual Report

SUMMARY OF 1991-92 INTENSIVE PROBATION ACfIVIlY

PR(X;RAM ACI1Vf1Y NUMBER I

NUMBEROFNEW ADMISSIONS 1,036 NUMBER OF CASES SUPE'RVISFD 1,245 * NUMBERSUCCESSFULLY TRANSFERRED TO RE'GULARPROBATION 3~ NUMBERSUCCESSFUlLYDISGIARGFD 138 NUMBFROFCASESREVOKFD 361 PERCENTAGE OF CASES REVOKED 2) NUMBER OF VIOLATION REroRTSCOMPLEfID 1,048 NUMBEROFPERSONAL CONTACTS 57,363 NUMBEROFSERVICEAGENCYCONTACIS 2,540 NUMBER OFSERVICE AGENCY RE'fERRALS 2,811 NUMBEROFCOMMUNITY SFRVICE HOURS COMPLETED 24,378

Fl.'ECOLLECTION ACfIVTlY

FEES mLl...ECTE'D CRIMINAL INJURIES $53,289 SUPERVISION 2fJ,5ti7 TOTAL FEES $73,8'36 DRUGTESnNGAcnvnv

NUMBER OF DRUG SCREENS (FlElD) 3,D21 NUMBER OF DRUG TESTS (lABORATORy) sro NUMBEROFDRUG~PAIDBYO~FR 133 NUMBER OFPOSITIVE DRUG TESTS 441

*-MON'IHLY AVERAGE

62 Community, Services

Communjty Correctjons increase in progrrun admissions (1,239 to 1,557) occurred. The programs serve 93 counties including all four metropolitan areas. At the end The Community COlTections Section is responsible of the fiscal year, 2,061 felony offenders were for overseeing the grant program for the delivery of underConununity Correction §upcrvision. Many community corrections services. Community Cor­ of the grantees use electronic monitoring de­ rections progrmns are intended as an altemative to vices to aid in enforcing house arrest compo­ incarceration for offenders. The FY 1991-92 appro­ nents, and three grantees operate residential priation was $5.1 million. Grants wentlo 16 continu­ centers for offenders. Cost per offender per day ation progrmns and two new progrmns. A 26 percent declined by $1.03 from the previous year.

COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS ADMISSIONS fY 1986-87 THROUGH FY 1991-92 1600

1400 OCOCAIt£ • OTHER DRUGS 1200 0 OTHER ADMISSIONS

1000 N U t.f800 B E R

200

FY 1986-87 FY 1987-88 FY 19&9-90 FY 11190-91 FY 1991-112

63 Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annl~.R_e.. p_o.r.t ______

SUMMARY OF 1991-92 COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS ACTIVITY c PROGRAM DATA NUMBI!..'R PROGRAMS 16 COUNTIES SERVED 93 JUDICIAL DISlRICfS 30 AVERAGE NUMBER OF CASES 1,879 COST PER OFFENDER DAY $6.61 ANNUAL COST PER OFFENDER $2,413

PROGRAM ACi1VITY

OFFENDERS ACCEPIED 1.557 SUCCESSFUL TERMINATIONS 826 UNSUCCESSFUL TERMINATIONS 532 YEAREND CENSUS 2,021

OFFENDER Acnvrrv

HOURS OF COMMUNITY SERVICE WORK PERfORMED 100.568 RESTITUTION PAID $199.970 WAGES/SALARY EARNED $7,469941 CHILD SUPPORT PAID $120,352 FINES PAID $146,715 COURT COSTS PAID $287,621 SUPERVISION FEES PAll') $67,408

OFFENDER SERVICES DEUVERED

HOURS OFGED/EDUCATIONAL 1RAINING 12,070 HOURS OF VOCATIONAL 'IRAINING 4,440 SCREENS FUR SUBSTANCE ABUSE 6,071 INPATIENT ALCOHOL TREATMENT (DAYS) 2980 INPATIENT DRUG 'IREATMENT (DAYS) 3,469 RESIDENfIAL TREATMENI' (DAYS) 9,392

64 Community Services t

COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS ADMISSIONS BY OFFENSE CATEGORY FY 1991-92

DRUG 511 (33%) THEn

B~GLARY

PROB. VIO. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ OTHER f ~~~~~ E ATTEt.lPTS N ~ "'TR. VEH. _t-L-"-""-' SEX

ROBBERY

ASSAULTS

HOt.IICIDES

o 100 200 300 500 600 tUlBER

COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS ADMISSIONS BY AGE

M+

4S-4Q

4O-U

A 3lI-JII G E 30-34

J7~ ~28 (24lC)

21-24

18-20

0 100 200 JOO NUMBER OF OFFENDERS

65 Fiscal Year 1991·92 Annual Report

COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS ADMISSIONS BY SEX AND RACE FY 1991-92

SEX RACE

OTHER 0.1:11:

BLACK 34:11:

66 LOCALJAD...CENSUS FISCAL YEAR 1991·92

Jill..y AUOUSf SEPIFMBER OCfOBER IDVEMBER DECl!MBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARQI AffilL MAY JUNE

1UfALJAlLroI'ULATIOO 12,624 12,803 12,888 13liSO 13,658 12,957 13,175 13,454 13,584 13.368 13,347 12.666 ,,,...... lDOCFELONS 1,961 1,935 1.889 .i:I"

ffiRrnNTAGE OFJAlLroPUlATION

fELONS 35.S% 34.8% 35.0% 33.4% 34.0% 36.9% 36.1% 361% 36.8% 35.8% 35.0% 362% lDOC 155% 15.1% 14.7% 141% 14.1% 15.8% 16.1% 16.4% 172% 163% 14.9% I:'iS% LOCAL 203% 19.7% 203% 191% 20.0% 21.1% 20.0% 19.5% 19.6% 19.4% 20.0% 20.7% ffiE·1RIALDEfAINEES 29.0% 30.4% 30.1% 29.7% 29.1% 282% 2S.9% 289% 28.9% 28.1% 27.7% 29.2% FELONY 223% 23.6% :-'3.5% 243% 226% 22.7% 22.9% 224% 224% 21.S% 21.9% 22.7% MISDEMEANANf 6.7% 6.8% 6,5% 5.4% 65% 55% 5.9% 65% 6.1% 5.7% 59% 6.5% I~ :3 =:I_. ~- 00 ~.., _.<: n ~ t:fJ Systemwide Statistics Systemwide Statistics ?

FELONY ADMISSIONS BY TYPE FISCAL YEAR 1991-92

IX

RETLfiNED ESCAPEES a: OTHERS ~ LOCAL

~ TDOC o SYSTEMWIDE

NEW eot.uTS

71"

o 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 l1OOO NUMBER

FELONY ADMISSIONS BY AGE FISCAL YEAR 1991-92

I.HCNOWN

C LOCAL 40+ 12X I?JTDOC 12X o SYSTENWIDE

J5-JlI 12X 12S

.30-34 2a.

25-29 24" 24X 211" 20-24 2"" 2""

<20 4" 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

71 Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

ADMISSIONS BY COUNTY OF CONVICTION BY JURISDICTION FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 TDOC LOCAL TOTAL COUNTY NUMBER I PERCENT NUMBER I PERCENT NUMBER IPERCENT

ANDERSON 73 1.2 3 0.1 76 0.8 BEDFORD 57 0.9 15 0.5 72 0.8 BENTON 19 0.3 2 0.1 21 0.2 BLEDSOE 10 0.2 0 0.0 10 0.1 BLOUNT 60 0.9 4 0.1 64 0.7 BRADLEY 88 1.4 1 0.0 89 1.0 CAMPBELL 24 0.4 2 0.1 26 0.3 CANNON 15 0.2 0 0.0 15 0.2 CARROLL 35 0.6 0 0.0 35 0.4 CARTER 41 0.6 3 0.1 44 0.5 CHEATHAM 21 0.3 18 0.6 39 0.4 CHESTER 15 0.2 0 0.0 15 0.2 CLAIBORNE 13 0.2 0 0.0 13 0.1 CLAY 11 0.2 5 0.2 16 0.2 COCKE 49 0.8 10 0.3 59 0.6 COFFEE 51 0.8 8 0.3 59 0.6 CROCKETT 27 0.4 1 0.0 28 0.3 CUMBERLAND 28 0.4 1 0.0 29 0.3 DAVIDSON 548 8.7 526 18.2 1,074 11.7 DECATUR 8 0.1 1 0.0 9 0.1 DEKALB 16 0.3 4 0.1 20 0.2 DICKSON 27 0.4 1 0.0 28 0.3 DYER 70 1.1 11 0.4 81 0.9 FAYETTE 70 1.1 5 0.2 75 0.8 FENTRESS 18 0.3 0 0.0 lu 0.2 FRANKLIN 26 0.4 0 0.0 26 0.3 GIBSON 67 1.1 1 0.0 68 0.7 GILES 33 0.5 2 0.1 35 0.4 GRAINGER 12 0.2 6 0.2 18 0.2 GREENE 82 1.3 28 1.0 110 1.2 GRUNDY 10 0.2 0 0.0 10 0.1 HAMBLEN 75 1.2 50 1.7 125 1.4 HAMILTON 580 9.2 11 0.4 591 6.4 HANCOCK 6 0.1 3 0.1 9 0.1 HARDEMAN 34 0.5 5 0.2 39 0.4 HARDIN 39 0.6 0 0.0 39 0.4 HAWKINS 51 0.8 10 0.3 61 0.7 HAYWOOD 30 0.5 0 0.0 30 0.3 HENDERSON 26 0.4 2 0.1 28 0.3 HENRY 36 0.6 1 0.0 37 0.4 HICKMAN 21 0.3 3 0.1 24 0.3 HOUSTON 5 0.1 0 0.0 5 0.1 HUMPHREYS 15 0.2 2 0.1 17 0.2 JACKSON 11 0.2 0 0.0 11 0.1 JEFFERSON 29 0.5 3 O.! 32 0.3 JOHNSON 12 0.2 0 O.C' I 12 0.1 KNOX 335 5.3 7 0.21 342 3.7 LAKE 9 0.1 2 0.1 11 0.1

72 ------

Systemwide Statistics 2

ADMISSIONS BY COUNTY OF CONVICTION BY JURISDICTION FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 TDOC LOCAL TOTAL COUNTY NUMBER 1PERCENT NUMBER 1 PERCENT NUMBER 1 PERCENT

LAUDERDALE 46 0.7 4 0.1 50 0.5 LAWRENCE 27 0.4 4 0.1 31 0.3 LEWIS 16 0.3 3 0.1 19 0.2 LINCOLN 35 0.6 7 0.2 42 0.5 LOUDON 18 0.3 1 0.0 19 0.2 MACON 17 0.3 0 0.0 17 0.2 MADISON 126 2.0 2 0.1 128 1.4 MARION 29 0.5 1 0.0 30 0.3 MARSHALL 58 0.9 1 0.0 59 0.6 MAURY 64 1.0 6 0.2 70 0.8 MCMINN 38 0.6 1 0.0 39 0.4 MCNAIRY 8 0.1 3 0.1 11 0.1 MEIGS 7 0.1 0 0.0 7 0.1 MONROE 41 0.6 2 0.1 43 0.5 MONTGOMERY 54 0.9 13 0.5 67 0.7 MOORE 1 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 MORGAN 8 0.1 0 0.0 8 0.1 OBION 43 0.7 7 0.2 50 0.5 OVERTON 8 0.1 1 0.0 9 0.1 PERRY 1 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 PICKETT 2 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.0 POLK 15 0.2 0 0.0 15 0.2 PUTNAM 39 0.6 7 0.2 46 0.5 RHEA 14 0.2 2 0.1 16 0.2 ROANE 19 0.3 0 0.0 19 0.2 ROBERTSON 34 0.5 9 0.3 43 0.5 RUTHERFORD 157 2.5 50 1.7 207 2.2 SCOTT 9 0.1 0 0.0 9 0.1 SEQUATCHIE 4 0.1 0 0.0 4 0.0 SEVlER 45 0.7 22 0.8 67 0.7 SHELBY 1.643 26.0 1.9~3 67.0 3.576 38.8 SMITH 5 0.1 1 0.0 6 0.1 STEWART 5 0.1 0 0.0 5 0.1 SULLIVAN 223 3.5 7 0.2 230 2.5 SUMNER 96 1.5 12 0.4 108 1.2 TIPTON 38 0.6 0 0.0 38 0.4 TROUSDALE 12 0.2 0 0.0 12 0.1 UNICOI 16 0.3 2 0.1 18 0.2 UNION 7 0.1 0 0.0 7 0.1 VAN BUREN 4 0.1 0 0.0 4 0.0 WARREN 18 0.3 6 0.2 24 0.3 WASHINGTON 100 1.6 3 0.1 103 1.1 WAYNE 5 0.1 1 0.0 6 0.1 WEAKLEY 35 0.6 1 0.0 36 0.4 WHITE 15 0.2 1 0.0 16 0.2 WILLIAMSON 125 2.0 9 0.3 134 1.5 WILSON 61 1.0 5 0.2 66 0.7

TOTAL 63291 100 28841 100 92131 100

73 Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

FELONY ADMISSIONS BY RACE FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 5500 57';

5000

4500 o SYSTEMWIDE

4000 42X ~TDOC

3500 ISd LOCAL N 51" U3QOO 4B~ M B 2500 E R2000

1500

1000

500

1~ 0 WHITE BLACK OTHER RACE

FELONY ADMISSIONS BY SEX FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 l1OOO QJll

7000 o SYSTEMWIDE ~ rooc 0'" ~ !Sa LOCAL N U &000 M ~~~~ B E 4000 R

gJX

2000

1000 0- 7X 7X 7X o Wh: I WALE

74 Systemwide Statistics

FELONY ADMISSIONS BY PRIMARY OFFENSE GROUP FISCAL YEAR 1991-92

PRIMARY %OF LOCALLY %OF %OF OFFENSE IDoe SENTENCED LOCAL SYSTEM SYSTEM GROUP IDOC TOTAL FELONS TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL

HABITUAL OFFENDER I 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.0%

HOMICIDE 525 8.3% 71 2.5% 596 6.5% MURDER 1 98 1.5% 0 0.0% 98 1.1% MURDER 2 228 3.6% 1 0.0% 229 2.5% OTIiER HOMICIDE 199 3.1% 70 2.4% 269 2.9%

KIDNAPPING 43 0.7% 3 0.1% 46 0.5%

SEX OJ-oT-ENSES 355 5.6% 96 3.3% 451 4.9% RAPE 83 1.3% 6 0.2% 89 1.0% AGGRAV A'lED RAPE 101 1.6% 1 0.0% 102 1.1% AGGRA VA 'lED SEXUAL BAT1ERY 80 1.3% 7 0.2% 87 0.9% OTHER SEX OFFENSES 91 1.4% 82 2.8% 173 1.9%

ROBBERY 852 13.5% 252 8.7% 1 104 12.0% AGGRAVATED ROBBERY 530 8.4% 10 0.3% 540 5.9% ROBBERY 251 4.0% 180 6.2% 431 4.7% OTHER ROBBERY 71 1.1% 62 2.1% 133 1.4%

BURGLARY 1287 20.3% 625 21.7% 1912 20.8% AGGRAVATED BURGLARY 713 11.3% 233 8.1% 946 10.3% BURGLARY - OTHER THAN HABITATION 502 7.9% 262 9.1% 764 8.3% OTHER BURGLARY 72 1.1% 130 4.5% 202 2.2%

THEFT' AND STOLEN PROPERTY 597 9.4% 412 14.3% 1009 11.00/0 THEFT OF PROPERTY $10.000-$60,000 103 1.6% 76 2.6% 179 1.9% THEFT OF PROPERTY $1,000-$10,000 358 5.7% 203 7.0% 561 6.1% THEFT OF PROPERTY $500-$1,000 115 1.8% 125 4.3% 240 2.6% OTHER THEFr AND STOLEN PROPERTY 21 0.3% 8 0.3% 29 0.3%

FORGERY FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT 220 3.5% 105 3.6% ~~25 3.5%

ASSAULT 442 7.0% 314 10.9% 756 8.2% AGGRAVA 'lED ASSAULT 361 5.7% 234 8.1% 595 6.5% OTHER ASSAULT 81 1.3% 80 2.8% 161 1.7%

ARSON 57 0.9% 16 0.6% 73 0.8%

DRUG OFFENSES 1714 27.1% 878 30.4% 2592 28.1% COCAINE OFFENSES 1,250 19.8% 214 7.4% 1.464 15.9% OTHER DRUG OFFENSES 464 7.3% 664 23.0% 1,128 12.2%

E..o;;CAPE (JAIL OR PRISON) 38 0.6% 9 0.3% 47 0.5%

ALL OTHERS 198 3.1% 103 3.6% 301 3.3%

TOTAL 6.329 100.00/0 2.884 100.00/" 9.213 100.0%

75 ~------

Fiscal Year 1991·92 Annual Report

FELONY ADMISSIONS - AVERAGE TOTAL SENTENCE LENGTII BY PRIMARY OFFENSE GROUP FISCAL YEAR 1991-92

TDOC LOCALLY SENTENCED SYSTEMWIDE PRIMARY NUMBER AVERAGE NUMBER AVERAGE NUMBER AVERAGE OFFENSE OF SENTENCE OF SENTENCE OF SENTENCE GROUP OFFENDERS (YY/MM) OFFENDERS (YYIMM) OFFENDERS (YY/MM)

HABITUAL OFFENDER 1 45JtJO 0 OOmo 1 45ftJO

DEATH ROW 13 N.A. N.A. N.A. 13 N.A.

HOMICIDE 512 22/07 71 3/11 583 20JtJ5 MURDER 1 85 45ft)2 0 OOftJO 85 45/02 MURDER 2 228 24ftJ4 1 22/00 229 24/04 OTIIER HOMICIDE 199 11/00 70 3/08 269 9/01

KIDNAPPING 43 21101 3 4iU4 46 19/08

SEX OFFENSES 355 14/02 96 4ft) 1 451 Iml RAPE 83 11/08 6 7/04 89 11/05 AGGRAVATED RAPE 101 28ft)2 1 20/00 102 28/01 AGGRAVATED SEXUAL BATTERY 80 9/04 7 7/07 87 9/02 OTHER SEX OFFENSES 91 5ftJ4 82 3/05 173 4ft)5

ROBBERY 852 13JtJ2 252 4/10 1 104 11JtJ4 AGGRAVATED ROBBERY 530 15/01 10 11/01 540 15/00 ROBBERY 251 8/06 180 5/00 431 7/00 OTHER ROBBERY 71 16/00 62 3m 133 1OftJ4

BURGLARY 1287 6/07 625 3/05 1 912 5/07 AGGRAVATED BURGLARY 713 7/10 233 4/07 946 7/00 BURGLARY-OTHER TIIAN HABITATION 502 5/05 262 2/11 764 4/06 OTHER BURGLARY 72 2/10 130 2/00 202 2/04

TIIEFT AND STOLEN PROPERTY 597 5/00 412 2ft)7 1009 4/00 THEFf OF PROPERTY S10,OOO-$60,OOO 103 5/10 76 4/01 179 5/01 TIIEFT OF PROPERTY $1,000-$10,000 358 5/06 203 2/10 561 4/06 TIIEFT OF PROPERTY $500-$1,000 115 3/01 125 1/06 240 2/04 OTHER TIIEFT AND STOLEN PROPERTY 21 2/08 8 1/04 29 2/04

FORGERY FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT 220 4/00 105 2/05 325 3/06

ASSAULT 442 6ft)8 314 3/06 756 5ft)5 AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 361 7ftJ4 234 4/01 595 6/01 OTIIER ASSAULT 81 3/10 80 1/08 161 2/10

ARSON 57 8iU4 16 2/11 73 7ft)1

DRUG OFFENSES 1714 7/06 878 3nI 2592 6iU4 COCAINE OFFENSES 1,250 8/05 214 6/01 1,464 8/00 OTIIER DRUG OFFENSES 464 5/02 664 3/01 1,128 4/00

ESCAPE (JAIL OR PRlSONl 38 5JtJ7 9 2JtJ6 47 4/11

ALL OTIIERS 189 2/10 96 1/08 285 2ft)5

UNPROCESS;ED NEW COMMITS 9 N.A. 7 N.A. 16 N.A.

TOTAL 6,329 9/03 2,884 3/06 9,213 7/05

NOTE - UPESBNTENCBS CALCULATED AT 45 YEARS. DBA TH & UNPROCESSED SENTENCES ARE NOT INCLUDED IN AVERAGES.

76 Systemwide Statistics

ADMISSIONS BY TOTAL SENTENCE LENGTH FISCAL YEAR 1991-92

NUMBER OF TOTAL SENTENCE OFFENDERS PERCENT

1 YEAR 659 7.2% >1- 2 YEARS 1183 12.8% >2- 3 YEARS 1735 18.8% >3 - 4 YEARS 788 8.6% >4~ 5 YEARS 543 5.9% >5 - 6YEARS 606 6.6% >6-lOYEARS 2118 23.0% >10 - 15 YEARS 774 8.4% > 15 - 20 YEARS 324 3.5% >20YEARS 383 4.2% LIFE SENlENCES 86 0.9% DEATH SENlENCES 13 0.1% UNPROCESSED SENTENCES 1 0.0%

TOTAL 9213 100.0%

NOTE - >20 YEARS CATEGORY EXCLUDES LIFE AND DEATH SENTENCES. FIGURES INCLUDE ALL ADMISSIONS TO INCARCERATION: NEW COMMITMENTS, PAROLE VIOLATORS, AND OTHERS.

77 Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

FELONY INMATE POPULATION BY AGE JUNE 3D, 1992

ltIKNOWN r: ~]I:I 12:1 I • LOCAL FELONS 40+ JOOOj 14:1 '>'////h 22:1 III TDOC BACKUP 1!IX 12:1 r:iI TDOC 35-30 ~ 131: '>'/h 17:1 o SYSTEMWIDE 1~:I 19:1 30-34 ~V'>tY'tl 1!IX Y/.-I' ~1" ~

~ 25-29 ..t'V\/\/VVVV\, 2a:I '>'//////////. 21:1

211:1 20-24 25:1 111:1

<20 ~92:1 S o 1000 2000 300D

FELONY INMATE POPULATION BY RACE JUNE 3D, 1992 SYSTEMWIDE,lI: TOOC,lI: INHOUSE

47l1: 47l1:

BLACK ~ TOOC BACKUP LOCAL FELONS 3lI WHITE CJ :zx OTHER _

4711

78 Systemwide Statistics p

FELONY INMATE POPULATION BY SEX JUNE 30, 1992 SYSTEMWIDE moe INHOUSE 4X 4%

118l1; MALE 0 all% rooc BACKUP FEMALE. LOCAL FELONS ex 8%

FE/..ONY INMATE POPULATION BY RACE/SEX JUNE 3D, 1992 2X 4" OT/UALE • LOCAL FELONS bJi: C rooc BACI os OT/FDLf,LE ox ~ rooc INHOUSE ox !Ill: o SYSTEMWIDE R xn A WH/NALE I)()()('\{)()(' 42lC C /////////////////// / !l2X E / 1% "" ~WH/FDLf,\.E X ~2X2X 811" BL/NALE ~48" /// /// / / / / / / / / / / / 41X 47X BL/FDLf,LE ~H o 1000 2000 <4000 7000 15000 NUMBER

79 Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

FELONY INMATE POPULATION BY PRIMARY OFFENSE GROUP JUNE 30,1992

rnIMARY %OF %OF LOCALLY %OF %OF OFFENSE 'IlX1C INHOUSE TOOC BACKUP SENTENCED LOCAL SYSTEM SYSTEM GROUP INHOUSE" TOTAL BACKUP TarAL FELONS TarAL TarAL TOTAL " HABnuAL OFFENDER 235 2.4,% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 235 1.6%

~

HOMlaDE 2,388 24.3% 95 4.8% 100 3.8% 2583 17.9% MURDER 1 971 9.9% 8 0.4% 0 0.0% 978 6.8% MURDER 2 1,141 11.6% 36 1.9% 0 0.0% 1,177 8.2% OlllER HOMICIDE 276 2.8% 51 2.6% 100 3.8% 426 3.0%

KIDNAPPING 242 2.5% 12 0.6% 6 0.2% 259 1.8%

SEX OFFENSES 1992 20.2% 126 6.4% 150 5.7% 2269 15.7% RAm 497 5.1% 36 1.9% 24 0.9% 557 3.9% AGGRAVATED RAm 948 9.6% 23 1.1% 1 0.0% 972 6.7% AGGRAVATEDSEXUALBATIERY 417 4.2% 35 1.8% 19 0.7% 472 3.3% CYl'HER SEX OfFENSES 130 13% 32 1.7% 106 4.0% 268 1.9%

ROBBERY 1760 17.9% 246 12.6% 248 9.4% 2254 15.6% AGGRAVATED ROBBERY 1,416 14.4% 161 83% 17 0.7% 1,595 11.1% ROBBERY 256 2.6% 75 3.8% 191 73% 521 3.6% OTHER ROBBERY 88 0.9% 10 05% 40 15% 137 1.0%

BURGlARY 1.040 10.61T, 395 20.'l1T, 507 19.31T, L942 13.59'< AGGRAVATED DURGI..ARY 707 72.% 234 12.0% 240 92.% 1,181 82.% BURGLARY -OTHER TIIAN HABITATION 313 3.2% 140 7.1% 199 7.6% 652 45% (YI1IERBURGLARY 20 02.% 21 1.1% 68 2.6% 108 0.7%

THEFr AND STOLEN PROPERTY 345 35% 199 10.2% 335 12.7% 879 6.1% TIIEFf OF PROPERTY $10,000-$60,000 57 0.6% 35 1.8% 74 2.8% 166 1.1% TIIEFf OF PROPERIY S1,oo0-51 0.000 237 2.4% 123 63% 183 7JJ% 543 3.8% TIIEFT OF PROPERTY $500·S1,OOO 37 0.4% 37 1.9% 75 2.8% 149 1.0% OlllER TIIEFf AND STOLEN PROffiRTY 14 0.1% 4 02.% 3 0.1% 21 0.1%

RlRGERY,FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT 91 0.9% 72 3.7% 72 2.8% 235 1.6%

ASSAULT 677 6.9% 139 7.1% 340 13.0% 1157 8.0% AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 648 6.6% 117 6.0% 315 12.0% 1,080 75% OlHERASSAULT 29 03% 22 !.l% 25 1.0% 76 05%

ARSON 74 0.8% 20 1.0% 14 05% 108 0.7%

DRUG' 908 9.21T, 583 29.81T, 772 29.41T, 2.263 15.7'!!: COCAINE OFFENSES 654 6.6% 451 23.1% 266 10.2% 1,371 95% OlHER DRUG OFFENSES 254 2.6% 132 6.7% 506 193% 891 6.2%

ESCAPE OAIL OR PRISON) 26 03% 13 0.7% 12 0.4% 50 0.3%

AILCYI'HERS 65 0.71T, 57 2.9% 70 2.71T, 19' 1.3%

TOTAL 9,843 100.0% 1,957 100.0% 2,626 100.0% 14,426 100.0%

80 ----- ~------

Systemwide Statistics o

FELONYlNMA1EPOPULAl1ON·AVERAGETOTALSE"'1'ENCELENGTH BY PRlMARY OFFENSE GROUP JUNE 30,1992

~INHOUSE ~BACKUP LOCALLY SENTENCED SYS'~MWIDE PRlMARY NUMBER AVERAGE NUMBER AVERAGE NUMBER AVERAGE NUMBER AVERAGE aTENSE CF SENTENCE OF SENTENCE (F SENTENCE (F SENTENCE GROUP OFFENDERS (Yl~'MM) OFFENDERS CYY/MM) 0FFIlNDERS CYYlMM) OFFENDERS raLMML

HABITUAL OFFE.lIIDER 235 45/00 0 00/00 0 00/00 235 45/00

OOAllIROW 100 NA. 2 NA NA NA. 102 NA

HOMICIDE 2.288 38/02 93 16/00 100 4104 2,481 35/07 MURDER 1 871 5'}JOO 6 45/04 0 00/00 877 51/11 MURI:eR2 1,141 33105 36 21/05 0 00/00 1,177 32/10 0I1:IBR HOMICIDE 276 14104 51 8/04 100 4/04 427 lJP2

KIDNAPPlNG 242 35/01 12 15/10 6 ,!I('() 260 33/01

SEX OFFIlNSES 1.992 26/02 126 11107 ISO 5/01 2.268 23/08 RAPE 497 2'}JOO 36 12/04 24 6/04 557 2®S AGGRAVATED RAPE 948 36tIJ1 23 25/04 1 15/00 m 35/07 AGORA VATEDSEXUAL BATIERY 417 14/00 35 8,u6 19 6/10 471 13101 OfHER SEX Of'!'Flo.ISES 130 9,(l1 32 4/10 106 ~ 268 6,us

ROBBERY 1760 2MIl. 246 13/02 248 5110 2~54 2Q'1I AOORAVATEDROBBERY 1,416 26111 161 IS,m 17 10/11 1.594 24111 ROBBERY 2S6 I'}JOO 75 9m 191 SIll 522 9{¥> OI'HER ROBBERY 88 mJ8 10 12Jff1 40 3101 138 16If17

BURGLARY 1,D40_ lWI 395 6107 !fIJI 4J02 1942 9.00 AGGRAVATED BURGLARY 7f11 13/11 234 7m 240 SJQ4 1,181 1~ BURGLARY.anmR TIiANHABITAl10N 313 9/11 140 5/04 199 3JQ6 652 6nI OI'HER BURGLARY 20 5/11 21 3/05 68 7!05 109 3,()4

THEFf AND STOLEN PROPERTY 345 9/00 199 4/11 335 3/0<1 879 5111

1HEFT OF PROPERTYS10,OQO.$6O,OOO ~ 8m 3S 6/06 74 ~ 166 6,()4 1HEFT OFPROPERTYSI~IO.OOO 237 9/06 123 5/04 183 3/05 543 6/06 1HEFT OF PROPERTY $500$1,000 ~ 6/10 'rl 2P> 75 ml 149 3/04 0l1l1!R 'J'HFFI' M'DSTOU!N PROPERTY 14 8,us 4 mo 3 VJO 21 5/11

FORGERY.FRAUD AND EMBEZZl.8ME.NT 91 900 72. 3/ll 72. 2106 235 S,Ot

ASSAULT fiT] 13Kl1 139 6106 340 4104 1156 9A'lS AGORAVATEDASSAULT 648 13,Q4 117 7/01 315 4tI)6 1,080 1(\'00 OI1:IBRASSAULT 2) s.w 22 3/05 25 mo 76 4/10

ARSON 74 1~5 20 6/10 14 5106 1(8 11/05_

mUG OFFENSES 9(ll llKl4 583 7106 772 4110 2.263 8m COCAINE OFfENSES 654 1006 451 sm 266 7/00 1,371 SIll 0l1l1!R DRUG OI'FENSES 254 13m 132 5/02 506 3/f!7 892 6,01

ESCAPe (JAIL OR PRISON) 26 10m 13 5/04 12 4104 51 7m

AlLarHERS 65 9,(lS ~ 3m 70 1/06 192 4.w

TOTAL 9$43 24(CJ'I l~m S/OI 2,626 4/OS 14,426 18/01

NarE.lJFBSENTENCESARBCALCUlATEDAT45 YEARS. D!!ATH & UNPROCESSEDS8N1ENCES ARBNOflNCLUDBD IN AVERAGES.

81 Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

FELONY RELEASES BY TYPE FISCAL YEAR 1991-92

OTHER • LOCAL

~ BACKUP

~ INHOUSE o SYSTEMWIDE T Y 27.7'" P ~------~ E SENTENCE EXPIRATION

57.7'"

o 1000 2000 JOOO 4000 5000 6000 NUMBER

FELONY RELEASES BY AGE FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 O.ex O.7X IN

<20 3.1:1 0 500 1000 1500

82 Systemwide, Statistics

FELONY RELEASES BY SEX FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 9000 92.:3:1;

8000 o SYSTEMWIDE 7000 ~ moc INHOUSE ICI TDOC BACKUP 6000 N ISl LOCAL FELONS Usooo M 8 E4000 R 92.1~ JOOO

2000

1000 7.9'; B.O'; 7.2'; 0 IAALE FEMALE SEX

FELONY RELEASES BY RACE FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 5500 55.0" 5000 o SYSTEMWIDE 4500 «.(IlI; fZl TDOC INHOUSE 4000 ~ TDOC BACKUP !;:S LOCAL FELONS NJ500 U3OQO M B 2500 E R2000

1500

1000

500 1.0" 0.9" 1.5" 0.7% 0 WHITE BLACK OTHER RACE

83 Fiscal Year 1991·92 Annual Report

FELONY RELEASPS • AVERAGE TIME SERVED BY PRIMARY OFFENSE GROOP FlSCAL YEAR 1991·92

TDOC INHOUSE TDOCBACKUP LOCALLY SENTENCED SYSTEMWIDE AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE PRIMARY NUMBER TIME NUMBER TIME NUMBER TIME NUMBER TIME OfFENSE OF SERVED OF SERVED ("F SERVED OF SERVED GROliP OFFENDERS !YYIMMl OFFENDERS !YY1MMl OA'ENDERS !YYIMM) OFFENDERS !YY!MM)

HABITUAL OfFENDER 4 16/08 0 NlA 0 00100 4 16/08

HOMICIOO 230 6Kll 55 3/04 60 1/11 345 4/11 MURDER 1 10 16/08 1 22/lfJ 0 00100 11 17/02 MURlJ!!R2 142 7/01 12 5/11 1 9/11 155 7100 anlER HOMIClDB 78 3100 42 2100 59 1pj 179 2/05

KIDNAPPING 26 5f(T7 8 3/01 8 1/10 42 4/06

SEX OFl'F.NSPS 153 7/00. 68 2/00. 107 2/01 328 4106

RAP!:! ~ 7/11 19 3/05 29 3/05 128 6/00. AGORA VA TIlD RAPE 21 ' 9/10 2 2/02 0 00100 23 9/01

AGGRAVATIlDSEAUALBATTERY ~ 5/07 7 4/07 15 2110 52 4/07 OTHER SEX OfFF.NSPS 22 4f,XI 40 1/01 63 1/02 125 I,u!

ROBBERY 652 5/04- 269 4100 227 1/04 1148 4/00. AGGRA VA TID ROBBERY 487 S/IO 155 5/01 10 1107 6S2 5/07 ROBBERY 155 3,u! 104 , 2/07 166 1/06 425 2/07 anlER ROBBERY 10 2/11 10 liB 51 (¥10 71 1/04

BURGLARY 845 3,us 629 2Kl1 589 1m 2063 2105 AGORAVATID BUR(,'U\RY S27 3,u! 314 2/05 236 1107 1,077 2/11 BURGLARY.arHER 1HAN HABITATION 290 3/05 266 1/11 245 1100 SOl 2/00. arHER BIJRl.i"LARY 28 1/11 49 o,m Ill! (¥OS 185 0/11

'IllEFf AND STOLEN PROPERTY 335 2111 326 1110 363 (VII 1024 Ill! THEFl' OF PROPERTY $10,(J00,$60/XIJ «> 1/02 31 0110 so (¥ll 121 1100 THEFl' 01' PROPERTY $1 ,(JOO.$ I 0.000 245 3/04 185 2/05 181 1/01 611 2/05 THEFl' 01' PROPERTY$5ro$I,OOO 44 2!D4 92 1/04 119 (¥OS 2SS 1/00. OTHER 1llEFf AND STClI..EN PROPERTY 6 2100 18 DIll 13 (¥07 TI l,uJ

RJRGFRY.FRAUD AND IlMBEZZLllMENT !l8 2/07 lSI 1/04 95 1100 344 1/07

ASSAULT 30S 3/10 181 1/07 289 1/04 775 2105 AGORA VATIDASSApLT 290 3/11 131 2/00 205 1/08 626 2/10 OTHER ASSAULT 15 II(» so 0/07 84 (¥07 149 O,u!

0 ARSON 43 3100 24 1/07 18 1100 85 YSR.

DRUG

ESCAP[!(JAlL OR PRISON) 25 3KlI 21 1/07 7 1/01 53 2/04

ALLarHERS 54 2100 133 1/01 109 0/07 296 I/llJ

TarAL 3,533 3/10 2,708 I/ll ~10 1/CJ2 9,051 2/05

Nom -ESCAPES Nar INCLUDED.

84 Systemwide$ Statistics

FELONY RELEASES BY PRIMARY OFFENSE GROUP FISCAL YEAR 1991·92

PRIMARY %OF %OF LOCALLY %OF %OF OFF".cNSE TOOC INHOUSE TOOC BACKUP SENfENCED LOCAL SYSTEM SYSTEM GROUP INHOUSE TarAt BACKUP TarAL FELONS TarAL TaTAL TOTAL \.~~

HADmJAL mFENDER 4 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 0.0%

HOMICIDE 237 6.6% 56 2.1% 60 2.1% 353 3.9% MURDER I 13 0.4% I 0.0% 0 0.0% 14 0.2% MURDER 2 145 4.0% 12 0.4% I 0.0% 158 1.7% OUIER HOMICIDE 79 2.2% 43 1.6% 59 2.1% 181 2.0%

KIDNAPPING 27 0.7% 8 0.3% 8 03% 43 05%

SEX OFFENSES 153 4.'<)1. 68 ".~% 107 ''1.8% 3'8 'Ui9,: RAPE 80 2.2% 19 0.7% 29 1.0% 128 1.4% AG::lRAVATEDRAPE 21 0.6% 2 0.1% 0 0.0% 23 03% Arn3RAVATEDSEXUALBAT1ERY 30 0.8% 7 0.3% IS 0.5% 52 0.6% OTIIER SEX OFFENSES 22 0.6% 40 1.5% 63 2.2% 125 1.4% !

ROnOERY 676 lR.R9,: "7JJ .1lW% .277 SJ% Ll73 n~cp; AGGRAVATED ROBBERY 505 14.0% 155 5.7% 10 0.4% 670 73% ROBBERY 160 4.4% 105 3.9% 166 5.9% 431 4.7% O1HER ROBBERY 11 03% 10 0.4% 51 1.8% 72 0.8%

BURGLARY R61 "'.9% 63J """1<)1. 'iR9 21.0% "081 22.8<)1. AGGRAVATED BURGLARY 537 14.9% 316 11.6% 236 8.4% 1,089 11.9% BURGLARY-OTHER THAN HABITATION 296 8.2% 266 9.8% 245 8.7% 807 8.8% OTIIER BURGLARY 28 0.8% 49 1.8% 108 3.8% 185 2.0%

TIIEFr AND srOLEN PROPERTY 348 9.7% 326 12.0% 364 12.9% 1038 11.4% THEFr OF PROPER'IY 510,000·$60,000 41 1.1% 31 1.1% 50 1.8% 122 13% THEFrOFPROPER'IY $1,000-$10.000 256 7.1% 185 6.8% 182 6.5% 623 6.8% TIIEF.l'OFPROPER'IY 5500·$1,000 45 1.2% 92 3.4% 119 4.2% 256 2.8% O1HER THEFr AND STOLEN PROPER'IY 6 0.2% 18 0.7% 13 0.5% 37 0.4%

, ·.FRAUD.ANI) • "'"'1llMENT 100 2.8% 151 56% 95 3.49,: 346 3.S%

ASSAULT 306 85% 182 6.7% 289 10.3% 777 8.5% AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 291 8.1% 132 4.9% 205 73% 628 6.9% O1HERASSAULT 15 0.4% 50 1.8% 84 3.0% 149 1.6%

ARSON 44 1 )% . "4 0.9% 18 0.6% 86 0.9%

DRUG ." 765 21"9,: P,43 31.19,: 938 33.4~ 2546 27.9% COCAINE OFFENSES S46 15.2% 589 21.7% 415 14.8% 1,550 17.1)% OTIIER DRUG OFFENSES 219 6.1% 254 9.4% 523 18.6% 996 109%

ESCAPE (]AlL OR PRISON) 26 0.7% 21 .0.8% 7 0.29,: 54 0.69':

All.Ol1WR~ 55 15% J:l"l 4.99,: 109 3.99,: 297 3.3%

TOI'AL 3,602 100.0% 2.713 100.0% 2,811 100.0% 9,126 100.0%

85 Fiscal Year 1991·92 Annual Report

FELONY RELEASF ITPES BY PRlW-\RY OFFENSE GROUP FISCAL YEAR 1991·92

PRIMARY %OF ffiOBATION & %OF EXPIRATION %OF OFFENSE PAROLE COMMUNI1Y PROBATION AND OTHER %OF GROllJ' PAROl I' TorAl CORRECTION TarAT. anIER TarA! TOTAl. TarAI.

lIAllm.1AL or~·l'N!lF.R 4 0.1% 0 00% 0 0.0% 4 0.0%

IrOMrrml1 257 4.'1% 37 15% 59 4.4% 353 .,~. 3.9% MlJRDlJR 1 8 0.2% 0 0.0% 6 05% 14 0.2% MURDf1R2 138 2.6% 2 0.1% 18 IA% 158 1.7% O'J1lER HOMICIDE 111 2.1% 35 lA% 35 2.6% 181 2.0%

KnlNAPI~N(j 2Q 0.6% 4 02% 10 0.8% 43 0.5'"

.SEX OFFENSES 50 0.'1% % 3.R'" IS? 13.70/, 328 3.691 RAPE 29 0.6% 14 0.6% 85 6.4% 128 1.4% AGGRAVATED RAPE 14 03% 1 0.0% 8 0.6% 23 03% AGGRAVATED SEXUN. BATTERY 6 0.1% 5 0.2% 41 3.1% 52 0.6% OTHER SEX OFFENSES 1 0.0% 76 3.0%

ROBBERY %6 1R.3% 91 3.6% 116 8.7% 1173 12.9% AGGRAVA1EDROBDERY 594 113% 15 0.6% 61 4.6% 670 73% ROBBERY 343 6.5% 40 1.6% ..j8 3.6% 431 4.7% 0lHER ROBBERY 29 0.6% 36 1.4% 7 0.5% 72 0.8%

BURGLARY 1.??~ ?33CT, 568 225% 288 ':11.6% ?O81 'n.8% AGGRAVATED BURGLARY 793 15.1% 143 5.7% 153 11.5% 1,089 11.9% BURGLARY.()11-ffiR THAN HABITATION 394 7.5% 297 11.8% 116 8.7% 807 3.8% OlHERBURGLARY 38 0.7% 128 5.1% 19 lA% 185 2.0%

TIIEFf AND ~LEN PROI'ERfY 466 8.8% 406 16.1% 166 12.5% 1038 11.4% nIEFf OF PROPERTY SI0,()()()"S60.000 89 1.7% 27 1.1% 6 05% 122 13% TIIET'T OF PROPERTY $1,000·$10,000 315 6.0% 192 7.6% 116 8.7% 623 6.8% TIIEFf OF PROffiRTY $500-S1,OOO 55 1.0% 166 6.6% 35 2.6% 256 2.8% 0ll1ER TIIEFf AND STOLFN PROffiRTY 7 0.1% 21 0.8% 9 0.7% 37 0.4%

'.FRAUD. A"~ '''~r;~' roMF,,", rI~ 2.691 . 155 6.1<;1; 56 41CT, 346 3.80/,

ASSAULT 407 7.7'" 208 S.?<;I; 16? 11.2% m 85<;1; AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 394 7.5% 88 3.5% 146 11.0% 628 6.9% amERASSAULT 13 0.2% 120 4.8% 16 1.2% 149 1.6%

ARSON 47 0.'1% 28 1.1% 11 0.8% 86 0.9%

DRl TG OFH~':"SES 1.608 30.5<;1; 713 28.20/, 225 16.9% ?546 ?7.9o/, COCAINE OFFENSES 1,044 19.8% 366 14.5% 140 10.5% 1,550 17.0% OTIIER DRUG OFFENSES 564 10.7% 347 13.7% 85 6A% 996 10.9%

E<;rAPI1 (JATT. OR PRrSONL .,~ o.~% 19 0.8% 10 0.8% 54 0.691 , .ALL011IERS 49 0.9% ?(II 8M;' 47 3~<;I; 297 3.3%

TarAL 5,268 100.0% 2,526 100.0% 1,332 100.0% 9,126 100.0%

86 Systemwide Statistics

FELONY REl.,EASES· AVERAG!lTIME SERVED BY RELEASE TYPE FISCAL YEAR 199 ).92

PROBATION AND EXPIRATION PAROLE COMMUNITY CORRECIlON AND OTHER SYSTEMWIDE

A\~GE AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE PRIMARY NlIMBER TIME NlIMBER TIME NUMBER TIME NUMBER TIME OFFENSB OF SERVED OF SERVED OF SERVED OF SERVED GROUP OFFENDERS IYY/MM) OFFENDERS (yYIMM) OFFENDERS IYYIMM) OFFENDERS (YY/MM)

HABmJAL OrrENDER 4 16/08 0 00,00 0 00I0O 4 16Al~

HOMlODE 257 5,Q2 37 0110 51 6/01 345 4111 MURDER 1 8 19/02 0 00,00 3 11/10 11 17Al2 MURDER 2 138 &US 2 1/10 15 9/11 155 7,QJ OTHER HOMlODB 111 2,\)5 35 q.m 33 3,1)8 179 1M

KlDNAI'I'ING 29 4&$ 4 0108 9 ~1)2 42 4AJ6

SEX OI'FENSES 50 1111 96 0110 182 S,Q5 328 4AJ6 RAPEl 29 1/08 14 1,u4 85 &Q6 128 6{02 AGGRAVATED RAPS 14 8/11 I 0111 8 lW07 23 9ft)! AGGRAVATEDSUXUALBATTERY 6 6,{)1 5 2/01 41 4,{l8 52 4,Q7 OTHER SEX OFFENSES I 8/10 76 0/07 48 :VOl 125 I,Q!

. ROBBERY 9£6 4&

BURGLARY 1225 llB 568 OlIO 270 . 3/11 2063 W5 AGGRA VA'fED BURGLARY 793 2/11 143 1/01 141 4,Q5 1,077 2/11

BURGLARY-OTHER THAN HABITATION 394 2/11 297 q.m 110 ~ 801 2m OTIlERBURGLARY 38 1/11 128 0/06 19 1m 185 Dill

111m AND STOLEN PROPSRTY 466 "" 2,\)5 406 0108 152 3,Q2 1024 1/11 TIIIlfT OF PROPSRTY SIO,(J()i).$60,ooo 89 1/01 27 0/06 5 om 121 1/00 TIIIlfT OF PROPSRTY SI,(J()O.SIO,OOO 315 2/10 192 0111 104 3/10 611 2M THEFT OF PROPSRTY S5()().SI,OOO 55 2,\)2 166 0/07 34 2,QI 255 I/O! OTHER 'rum AND STOLEN PROPERTY 7 1/06 21 0{05 9 1/11 37 1/00 R>RGERY FRAUD AND,- EWJlBZlLEMENT 135 2,Q4 155 0/07 54 2Al5 344 1m ASSAULT 407 llB 208 0108 160 3m 775 2'{)5 AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 394 2/11 88 Wl1 144 3/06 626 2110 OTHER ASSAULT 13 l/O\l 120 0/06 16 1,Q4 149 o,rn

ARSON 47 2/10 28 0110 10 3m 85 2m

DRUG OFFENSES 1608 1,Q! 713 0108 223 2,Q6 2.544 1106 COCAINE OFl'ENSES 1,044 1/11 366 WID 138 2,Q8 1.548 I,Q! OTHER DRUG OFFENSES 564 1/07 347 0/06 85 2,Q2 996 1,Q4

ESCAPE HAIL OR PRISON) 25 2111 19 0107 9 4,Q4 53 2Al4

AU.OTIlERS 49 2(l1 201 0/06 46 2,Q6 296 1m

TOTAL 5,268 2/11 2,526 q.m 1.257 3/11 9,051 1M

Nom· ESCAPES NOT INCLUDED,

87 Directory Directory

(I). oz ~o 9 z o ~ LLJ 0:: 0:::o o lI..o ~ i!~ .~ 0.:. laJ Q

91 Fiscal Year 1991·92 Annual Report

Department of Correction

Central Office Management Staff Directory

Christine Bradley, Commissioner (615) 741·2071

Commissioner's Staff

Charles Bass, Deputy to the Commissioner 741-6898

Jim Thrasher, Assistant to Commissioner 741-6898

Susan MaUson, Assistant to Commissioner, Planning and Research 741-6918

Brandon Maloney, Infonnation Officer 741-2071

Dianne Neal, General Counsel 741-3087

Pat Weiland, Director of Compliance 741-6085

Chuck Reusing, Accreditation 741-4385

Andy Soltys. Internal Affairs 741-3069

Phil Coleman, Internal Audit 741-2436

Administrative Seryjces

Leon Joyner, Assistant Commissioner 741-3720

Fred Hix, Director of Budget 741-6932 Tom Mathis. Director of Correctional Enterprises 741-5705 Tom Giese, Director of Engineering 741-2841 Ted Fellman, Director of Fiscal Services 741-2351 Carl Hill, Director of Management Support 741-2351 Brandon Powers, Director of Management Infonnation Services 741-0900 William Keeling, Manager of Sentence Management Services 741-2773 Doug Bennett, Director of Personnel 741-0673

Trainjnll Facility

David Poindexter, Superintendent (615) 455-5413 N~ ,twork: 840-4533 Tennessee Correction Academy Post Office Box 1510 Tullahoma, TN 37388

92 2/28/93 Director,!

Adult Institutions

Linda Dodson. Assistmu Commissioner 741-2192

Howard Cook. Director of Classification 741-5754 Lamar Ervin. Director of Education 741-4718 Ope Oshomoji, Coordinator of Food Services 741-4385 Wilfred Rabi. Director of Health Scrvices 741-2607 Lcnny Lococo, Director of Mental Health Programming 741-6918 Brenda Clark. Drug Program Coordinator 741-5493

Lois M. DeBerry Special Needs Facility 7575 Cockrill Bend Industrial Road Nashville, TN 37243-0475 J. R. Miller, Warden (615) 350-2700

Community Services

Carey Rogers. Assistant Commissioner 741-5752

Don Harris. Director of Field Services 741-3141 Mike Jones, Director of Administration 741-5493

93 2/28/93 ~'iscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

Institutions

East Tennesse~.\Re~i()n

David Mills, Regional Administrator East Tennessee Region Office of the Regional Administrator Route 4, Box 600 Pikeville, TN 37367 (615) 881-3139 Network: 520-6398

Brushy Mountain State Penitentiary Morgan County Regional Correctional Facility Post Office Box 1000 Post Office Box 2000 Petros, TN 37845 Wartburg, TN 37887 (615) 324-4011 (615) 346-6641 Network: 250-6425 Network: 250-6573 Gil Monroe, Warden David Newberry, Warden

Carter County Work Camp Northeast Correctional Center Caller #1 Post Office Box 5000 Roan Mountain, TN 37687 Mountain City, TN 37683-5000 (615) 772-3231 (615) 727-7387 Network: 240-9153 Howard Carlton, Warden Harold Smith, Warden

Southeastern Tennessee State Regional Chattanooga Community Service Center Correctional Facility 815 North Hickory Street Route 4, Box 600 C.clttanooga, TN 37404 Pikeville, TN 37367 (615) 634-3189 (615) 881-3251 Network: 520-3189 Network: 520-6395 John Patterson, Warden James Bowlen, Warden

Knoxville Community Service Ctntet< 3735 Riverside Drive Knoxville, TN 37914 (615) 594-6394 Network: 250-6394 Joe Fowler, Warden

94 2/28/93 Directory

jnstjtutjons (Continued)

Middle Tennessee Reldon

Donal CrunpbeU, Regional Administrator Middle Tennessee Regional Office 100 Bomar Boulevard NashviHe, TN 37243-0474 (615) 741-7144 Network: 840-7144

Middle Tennessee Reception Center South Central Correctional Center 7177 Cockrill Bend Industrial Road P.O. Box 279 Nashville, TN 37243-0470 Clifton, TN 38425-0279 (615) 7414840 (615) 676-5372 Network: 840-4202 Network: 676-5346 Jack Morgan, Warden John Rees, Warden

Nashville Community Service Center Tennessee Prison for Women 7466 CentclUlial Place Extended 3881 Slewart.') Lane Nashville, TN 37243-0466 Nashville, TN 37243-0468 (615) 741-6587 (615) 741-1245 Network: 840-6587 Network: 840-1245 Jim Dickman, Warden Penny Bernhardt, Warden

Riverbend Maximum Security Institution Turney Center Industrial Prison 7475 Cockrill Bend Industrial Road Route 1 Nashville, TN 37243-0471 Only, TN 37140 (615) 741-7876 (615) 129-.5161 Network: 840-7876 Network: 840-1679 Mike Dutton, Warden Ricky Bell, Warden

95 2/28/93 Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

Institutions (Continued)

West Tepnessee RelZion

Billy McWherter, Regional Administrator West Tennessee Regional Office 817 Church Street Tiptonville. TN 38079 (901) 253-9000

Fort Pillow Pri~on and Farm Northwest Correctional Center Route 2 Route 1, Box 660 Henning, TN 38041 Tiptonville, TN 38079 (901) 738-5051 (901) 253-6272 Network: 350-8011 Network: (901) 286-8367 Fred Raney, Warden Donnie Noles, Warden

Lake County Regional Correctional Facility W2yne County Boot Camp Route 1, Box 330 Post Office Box 182 Tiptonville. TN 38079 Clifton, TN 38425 (901) 253-9995 (615) 676-3345 Network: 340-6514 Network: 741-1545 Robert Conley, Warden Malcolm Davis, Warden

Mark H. Luttrell Reception Center West Tennessee High Security Facility 6000 S tate Road Route 2, Green's Chapel Road Memphis, TN 38134 Henning, TN 38041 (901) 372-2080 (901) 738-5044 Network: 360-7914 Network: 350-7789 Bruce MacDonald, Warden Billy Compton, Warden

96 2/28/93 Directo,!!

Regional Probation Offices

Delta Region South Central Region Tenth Floor, State Office Building 2506 Pillow Drive 170 North Main Street Columbia, TN 38401 Memphis, TN 38103 (615) 380-2575 (901) 543-7380 Network: 840-8575 Network: 360-7380 William Clardy, Director George Little, Director

Southeast Region East Tennessee Region Ste. 250 E, Interstate Building 2700 Middlebrook Pike 540 McCallie Avenue Sll~te 210. State Plaza Chattanooga, TN 37402 Knoxville. TN 37921 (615) 634-6442 (615) 594-6577 Network: 470-6442 Network: 250-6577 James Green, Director John Clabo, Director

Southwest Region First Tennessee Region 360 North Cumberland Street 196 Montgomery Street Jackson, TN 38301 Johnson City, TN 37601 (901) 423-5788 (615) 928-8111 Network: 340-5788 Network: 854-5320 Michael Cole, Director Danny McGinnis, Director

Upper Cumberland Region Mid~CumJJerland Region' Post Office Box 3231 Eleventh Floor, Executive Building 442 Neal Street East 1719 West End Avenue Cookeville. TN 38502-3231 Nashville, TN 37243-0472 (615) 741-0292 (615) 741-3269 Network: 840-0292 Network: 840-3269 John Alcorn, Director Bettye Alsup, Director

Northwest Region Post Office Box 749 Route 2, Captial Drive Dresden. TN -: 8225 (901) 364-3147 Network: 340-6531 Robert Austin, Director

97 2/28/93 Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

Probation field Offices

Blountville Field Office Gallatin Field Office Post Office Box 425 176 West Franklin Blountville, TN 37617 Gallatin. TN 37066 (615) 323-4197 (615) 451-648-5550 Network: 854-5305 Network: 840-3269 Robert Henshaw, Office Manager Connie Topps, Contact

Charlotte Field Office Greenville Field Office General Delivery 905 B Mason Street Charlotte. TN 37036 Greeneville, TN 37743 (615) 789-9291 (615) 638-2994 Nashville Line: (615) 741-5773 Network: 854-5352 David Deavers, (Contact) Linda Woods, Office Manager

Clarksville Field Office Lebanon Field Office 115 North Third Street 212 East Main Street Post Office Box 442 Lebanon, TN 37087 Clarksville. TN 37042-0442 (615) 443-2759 (615) 648-5550 Rick Oakley, Contact Network: 450-5550 Donald McIntosh, Office Manager Madisonville I<'ield Office 137 1/2 College Street Cleveland Field Office Madisonville, TN 37354 478 First Street, N.W. (615) 442-3936 Cleveland, TN 37311 E. J. Harmon, Office Manager (615) 478-0313 Network: 530-0313 Maryville Field Office E. J. Harmon, Office Manager 304 Home Avenue Maryville, TN 37801 Clinton Field Office (615) 981-2360 423 South Main Street . John Riley, Probation Manager Clinton, TN 37716 (615) 457-4995 McMinnville Field Office Network: 250-6546 203 West Main Phillip Carr, Office Manager McMinnville, TN 37110 (615) 473-7213 Dyersburg Field Office Sammy Howard, Office Manager 435 West Markel Street Dyersburg, TN 38024 North Memphis Field Office (901) 286-8319 1633 Madison Avenue Network: 360-5319 Memphis, TN 38104 Jerry Steele, Office Manager (901) 543-7383 Network: 360-7750 Ouida Stamper, Office Manager

98 2/28/93 Directory

Probation Field Offices (Coptinued)

South Memphis Field Office Murfreesboro Field Office 3358 South Third Street 323 North Walnut Street Tullahoma, TN 37388 Murfreesboro. TN 37130 (615) 741-2903 (615) 898-8030 Network: 840-2903 Network: 470-8030 Benjrunin Poindexter, Probation Manager Carl Berning. Office Manager

Morristown Field Office Tullahoma Field Office Courthouse Almex Post Office Box 281 Morristown. TN 37814 Tullahoma, TN 37388 (615) 587-7052 (615) 741-2903 Dennis Holt. Contact Janet Ledsinger, Office Manager

Commupity Correction A2epcies

Anderson County Community Corrections East Tennessee HumanResourceAgency Community Alternative TreaUnent Services 408 North Cedar Bluff Road 101 South Main Street, Suite 400 Suite 400 Clinton. TN 37716 Knoxville, TN 37923 (615) 457-7390 (615) 691-2551 AI Traywick. Program Manager Frank Tucker, Acting Program Manager

Corrections Management Corporation First Tennessee Human 317 North Main Resource Agency P.O, Box 401 101 Wilson Avenue Somerville, TN 38068 Johnson City, TN 37604 (901) 465-9258 (615) 461-8236 Larry Harvey, Program Manager Sam Fann, Program Manager

Davidson County Community Corrections Hamilton County 207 Third Avenue North Community Corrections Fifth Floor 225 North Holly St. Nashville, TN 37201 Chattanooga, TN 37404 (615) 862-8170 (615) 493-9268 Joe Morrell, Acting Program Manager Tommy Wright, Program Manager

Decatur County Community Corrections Hay House Pleasant Street, P.O. Box 116 Box 2071 Decaturville, TN 38329 Kingsport, TN 37662 (901) 852-2111 (615) 378-5709 Mary Jo Smith, Program Manager Chuck Walsh, Program Manager

99 2/28/93 Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

Community Correction Agencies (Continued)

.Justice Network, Inc. Project Free World 202 Union. 2nd Floor 1330 Lauderdale Memphis. TN 38103 Memphis, TN 38106 (901) 529-9544 (90l) 947-3644 Colleen McAllister, Acting Program Manager Ted Hawkins. Program Manager

Knox County Community Alternative to South Central Human Resource Agency Prison Program P.O. Box 738 1814 Lake Avenue Fayetteville, TN 37334 Knoxville. TN 37996-3925 (615) 433-7182 (615) 974-0881 Cathy Hayes, Program Manager Linda McLaughlin, Prog.';Un Manager Southeast Tennessee Madison County Community Corrections Community Corrections 102 Easl Baltimore 30 1/2 Second St. N.W. Suite 201, Elks Building Cleveland. TN 37311 Jackson. TN 38301 (615) 478-2030 (901) 422-1561 Gary Conner, Program Manager Bob Andersen. Progmm Manager Southeast Tennessee Human Mid-Cumberland Human Resource Agency Resource Agency 442 Metroplex 215 Rankin Avenue P.O. Box 11149 P.O. Box 805 Nashville, TN 37222-1419 Dunlap, TN 37237 (615) 331-6033 (615) 949-2191 Nancy Manning. Program Manager Chris Kleehammer, Program Manager

Montgomery/Robert.'IDn County Upper Cumberland Human Community Corrections Resource Agency 100 South Third Street 3111 Enterprise Drive P.O. Box 368 Cookeville. TN 38501-4258 Clarksville, TN 37041-0368 (615) 537-1127 (615) 648-5776 Buster Stockton, Program Manager Rex Cummings. Prognun Manager

100 2/28/93 ----~--~ --

RESEARCH BRIEFS AND PUBLICATIONS

The following research briefs and reports were published by the Planning and Research Section. Copies of these publications are available in the Planning and Research Section.

PUBLICA TION PUBUCA TION DATE

Older Incarcerated Felons in Terulessee January 1991

Tennessee Correction Capacity Fiscal Years 1992 Through 1994 February 1991

Female Felons in Terulcssee Aprii 1991

Department's Use of Minimum Restricted Custody Classification May 1991

Wayne County Boot Camp Update MJ:ly 1991

Sex Offender ProfIle June 1991

Incarcerated Felon Population Projections August 1991

Needs Assessment Study October 1991

Incarcerated Drug Offenders October 1991

Commitments to Incarceration by Offense Group Fiscal Years 1986-87 Through 1990-91 - Update October 1991

Profile of Sex Offenders and Victims December 1991

Death Row January 1992

Life-Sentenced Inmates February 1992

Changes in Total Correctional Population - Update February 1992

Evaluation and Revision of Probation Risk A'5sessment Instrument March 1992

1.990 and 1991 Prison Drug Testing Results April 1992

Wayne County Boot Camp Monitoring Report April 1992

Diversionary Effectiveness of Community Alternative Programs November 1992

Felony Inmate Population Projections January 1993

101