DOCSLIB.ORG

SFPD Compstat January 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SFPD Compstat January 2019 COMPSTAT Citywide Profile 01-JAN-2019 to 31-JAN-2019 Chief of Staff: Assistant Chief Hector Sainez Population: 837,442 Operations: Assistant Chief Toney Chaplin Area: 48.1 square miles Administration: Deputy Chief Robert Moser Investigations: Deputy Chief Michael Connolly Total sworn: 2217 Field Operations: Deputy Chief Ann Mannix Special Operations: Deputy Chief Michael Redmond Field Operations: Commander Daryl Fong Field Operations: Commander Daniel Perea Investigations: Commander Greg McEachern Chief William Scott JANUARY JANUARY DECEMBER JANUARY PART 1 VIOLENT CRIMES % Change % Change YTD 2018 YTD 2019 % Change 2018 2019 2018 2019 HOMICIDE 54‐20% 54‐20% 54‐20% RAPE 23 31 35% 26 31 19% 23 31 35% ROBBERY 254 237 ‐7% 306 237 ‐23% 254 237 ‐7% AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 212 158 ‐25% 204 158 ‐23% 212 158 ‐25% HUMAN TRAFFICKING‐SEX ACT 330% 1 3 200% 330% HUMAN TRAFFICKING‐INVOLUNTARY SERV. 00not cal 0 0 not cal 00not cal TOTAL PART 1 VIOLENT CRIMES 497 433 ‐13% 542 433 ‐20% 497 433 ‐13% JANUARY JANUARY DECEMBER JANUARY PART 1 PROPERTY CRIMES % Change % Change YTD 2018 YTD 2019 % Change 2018 2019 2018 2019 BURGLARY 460 379 ‐18% 416 379 ‐9% 460 379 ‐18% CRIME STATISTICS LARCENY THEFT* 3947 2988 ‐24% 3510 2988 ‐15% 3947 2988 ‐24% THEFT FROM VEHICLE* 2649 1881 ‐29% 2172 1881 ‐13% 2649 1881 ‐29% AUTO THEFT 340 313 ‐8% 374 313 ‐16% 340 313 ‐8% ARSON 26 25 ‐4% 24 25 4% 26 25 ‐4% TOTAL PART 1 PROPERTY CRIMES 4773 3705 ‐22% 4324 3705 ‐14% 4773 3705 ‐22% TOTAL PART 1 CRIMES 5270 4138 ‐21% 4866 4138 ‐15% 5270 4138 ‐21% * Larceny/Theft category includes Theft from Vehicle. Data Source: Crime Data Warehouse via BI Tools (Data was queried on February 11, 2019 and includes all Incidents that were entered into the system by February 10, 2019 at midnight); SFPD Homicide Unit NOTES: All statistics are based on date of occurrence, except Rape and Arson. Rape and Arson totals are based on date reported. Arrest data is not available. CompStat reports contain preliminary data and are subject to change. COMPSTAT Central Profile 01-JAN-2019 to 31-JAN-2019 District Supervisors District 2: Catherine Stefani District 3: Aaron Peskin District 6: Matt Haney District 7: Norman Yee Captain Robert Yick JANUARY JANUARY DECEMBER JANUARY PART 1 VIOLENT CRIMES % Change % Change YTD 2018 YTD 2019 % Change 2018 2019 2018 2019 HOMICIDE 01not cal 01not cal 01not cal RAPE 21‐50% 41‐75% 21‐50% ROBBERY 45 37 ‐18% 44 37 ‐16% 45 37 ‐18% AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 10 9 ‐10% 18 9 ‐50% 10 9 ‐10% HUMAN TRAFFICKING‐SEX ACT 20‐100% 1 0 ‐100% 20‐100% HUMAN TRAFFICKING‐INVOLUNTARY SERV. 00not cal 0 0 not cal 00not cal TOTAL PART 1 VIOLENT CRIMES 59 48 ‐19% 67 48 ‐28% 59 48 ‐19% JANUARY JANUARY DECEMBER JANUARY PART 1 PROPERTY CRIMES % Change % ChangeYTD 2018 YTD 2019 % Change 2018 2019 2018 2019 BURGLARY 53 81 53% 75 81 8% 53 81 53% CRIME STATISTICS LARCENY THEFT* 781 681 ‐13% 864 681 ‐21% 781 681 ‐13% THEFT FROM VEHICLE* 508 355 ‐30% 504 355 ‐30% 508 355 ‐30% AUTO THEFT 38 34 ‐11% 28 34 21% 38 34 ‐11% ARSON 27250% 6717% 27250% TOTAL PART 1 PROPERTY CRIMES 874 803 ‐8% 973 803 ‐17% 874 803 ‐8% TOTAL PART 1 CRIMES 933 851 ‐9% 1040 851 ‐18% 933 851 ‐9% * Larceny/Theft category includes Theft from Vehicle. Data Source: Crime Data Warehouse via BI Tools (Data was queried on February 11, 2019 and includes all Incidents that were entered into the system by February 10, 2019 at midnight); SFPD Homicide Unit NOTES: All statistics are based on date of occurrence, except Rape and Arson. Rape and Arson totals are based on date reported. Arrest data is not available. CompStat reports contain preliminary data and are subject to change. COMPSTAT SOUTHERN 01-JAN-2019 to 31-JAN-2019 District Supervisors District 3: Aaron Peskin District 5: Vallie Brown District 6: Matt Haney District 8: Rafael Mandelman District 9: Hillary Ronen District 10: Shamann Walton Captain Ed Del Carlo JANUARY JANUARY DECEMBER JANUARY PART 1 VIOLENT CRIMES % Change % Change YTD 2018 YTD 2019 % Change 2018 2019 2018 2019 HOMICIDE 00not cal 00not cal 00not cal RAPE 38167% 6833% 38167% ROBBERY 22 31 41% 36 31 ‐14% 22 31 41% AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 31 19 ‐39% 23 19 ‐17% 31 19 ‐39% HUMAN TRAFFICKING‐SEX ACT 01not cal 0 1 not cal 01not cal HUMAN TRAFFICKING‐INVOLUNTARY SERV. 00not cal 0 0 not cal 00not cal TOTAL PART 1 VIOLENT CRIMES 56 59 5% 65 59 ‐9% 56 59 5% JANUARY JANUARY DECEMBER JANUARY PART 1 PROPERTY CRIMES % Change % Change YTD 2018 YTD 2019 % Change 2018 2019 2018 2019 BURGLARY 68 37 ‐46% 67 37 ‐45% 68 37 ‐46% CRIME STATISTICS LARCENY THEFT* 561 326 ‐42% 405 326 ‐20% 561 326 ‐42% THEFT FROM VEHICLE* 381 208 ‐45% 267 208 ‐22% 381 208 ‐45% AUTO THEFT 28 33 18% 55 33 ‐40% 28 33 18% ARSON 440% 24100% 440% TOTAL PART 1 PROPERTY CRIMES 661 400 ‐39% 529 400 ‐24% 661 400 ‐39% TOTAL PART 1 CRIMES 717 459 ‐36% 594 459 ‐23% 717 459 ‐36% * Larceny/Theft category includes Theft from Vehicle. Data Source: Crime Data Warehouse via BI Tools (Data was queried on February 11, 2019 and includes all Incidents that were entered into the system by February 10, 2019 at midnight); SFPD Homicide Unit NOTES: All statistics are based on date of occurrence, except Rape and Arson. Rape and Arson totals are based on date reported. Arrest data is not available. CompStat reports contain preliminary data and are subject to change. COMPSTAT Bayview Profile 01-JAN-2019 to 31-JAN-2019 District Supervisors District 6: Matt Haney District 9: Hillary Ronen District 10: Shamann Walton Captain Valerie Matthews JANUARY JANUARY DECEMBER JANUARY PART 1 VIOLENT CRIMES % Change % Change YTD 2018 YTD 2019 % Change 2018 2019 2018 2019 HOMICIDE 02not cal 12100% 02not cal RAPE 02not cal 12100% 02not cal ROBBERY 36 24 ‐33% 40 24 ‐40% 36 24 ‐33% AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 38 29 ‐24% 27 29 7% 38 29 ‐24% HUMAN TRAFFICKING‐SEX ACT 0 0 not cal 0 0 not cal 0 0 not cal HUMAN TRAFFICKING‐INVOLUNTARY SERV. 0 0 not cal 0 0 not cal 0 0 not cal TOTAL PART 1 VIOLENT CRIMES 74 57 ‐23% 69 57 ‐17% 74 57 ‐23% JANUARY JANUARY DECEMBER JANUARY PART 1 PROPERTY CRIMES % Change % ChangeYTD 2018 YTD 2019 % Change 2018 2019 2018 2019 BURGLARY 34 53 56% 35 53 51% 34 53 56% CRIME STATISTICS LARCENY THEFT* 237 156 ‐34% 161 156 ‐3% 237 156 ‐34% THEFT FROM VEHICLE* 185 114 ‐38% 105 114 9% 185 114 ‐38% AUTO THEFT 44 67 52% 65 67 3% 44 67 52% ARSON 75‐29% 15400% 75‐29% TOTAL PART 1 PROPERTY CRIMES 322 281 ‐13% 262 281 7% 322 281 ‐13% TOTAL PART 1 CRIMES 396 338 ‐15% 331 338 2% 396 338 ‐15% *CompStat reports contain preliminary data and are subject to change Data Source: Crime Data Warehouse via BI Tools (Data was queried on February 11, 2019 and includes all Incidents that were entered into the system by February 10, 2019 at midnight); SFPD Homicide Unit NOTES: All statistics are based on date of occurrence, except Rape and Arson. Rape and Arson totals are based on date reported. Arrest data is not available. * Larceny/Theft category includes Theft from Vehicle. COMPSTAT Mission Profile 01-JAN-2019 to 31-JAN-2019 District Supervisors District 6: Matt Haney District 8: Rafael Mandelman District 9: Hillary Ronen District 10: Shamann Walton Captain Gaetano Caltagirone JANUARY JANUARY DECEMBER JANUARY PART 1 VIOLENT CRIMES % Change % Change YTD 2018 YTD 2019 % Change 2018 2019 2018 2019 HOMICIDE 10‐100% 10‐100% 10‐100% RAPE 84‐50% 94‐56% 84‐50% ROBBERY 35 38 9% 39 38 ‐3% 35 38 9% AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 35 28 ‐20% 37 28 ‐24% 35 28 ‐20% HUMAN TRAFFICKING‐SEX ACT 00not cal 0 0 not cal 00not cal HUMAN TRAFFICKING‐INVOLUNTARY SERV. 00not cal 0 0 not cal 00not cal TOTAL PART 1 VIOLENT CRIMES 79 70 ‐11% 86 70 ‐19% 79 70 ‐11% JANUARY JANUARY DECEMBER JANUARY PART 1 PROPERTY CRIMES % Change % Change YTD 2018 YTD 2019 % Change 2018 2019 2018 2019 BURGLARY 47 33 ‐30% 32 33 3% 47 33 ‐30% CRIME STATISTICS LARCENY THEFT* 457 334 ‐27% 355 334 ‐6% 457 334 ‐27% THEFT FROM VEHICLE* 275 218 ‐21% 219 218 0% 275 218 ‐21% AUTO THEFT 54 39 ‐28% 48 39 ‐19% 54 39 ‐28% ARSON 51‐80% 21‐50% 51‐80% TOTAL PART 1 PROPERTY CRIMES 563 407 ‐28% 437 407 ‐7% 563 407 ‐28% TOTAL PART 1 CRIMES 642 477 ‐26% 523 477 ‐9% 642 477 ‐26% * Larceny/Theft category includes Theft from Vehicle. Data Source: Crime Data Warehouse via BI Tools (Data was queried on February 11, 2019 and includes all Incidents that were entered into the system by February 10, 2019 at midnight); SFPD Homicide Unit NOTES: All statistics are based on date of occurrence, except Rape and Arson. Rape and Arson totals are based on date reported. Arrest data is not available. CompStat reports contain preliminary data and are subject to change. COMPSTAT Northern Profile 01-JAN-2019 to 31-JAN-2019 District Supervisors District 2: Catherine Stefani District 3: Aaron Peskin District 5: Vallie Brown District 6: Matt Haney District 8: Rafael Mandelman Captain Joseph Engler JANUARY JANUARY DECEMBER JANUARY PART 1 VIOLENT CRIMES % Change % Change YTD 2018 YTD 2019 % Change 2018 2019 2018 2019 HOMICIDE 00not cal 00not cal 00not cal RAPE 62‐67% 32‐33% 62‐67% ROBBERY 39 27 ‐31% 30 27 ‐10% 39 27 ‐31% AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 22 19 ‐14% 22 19 ‐14% 22 19 ‐14% HUMAN TRAFFICKING‐SEX ACT 00not cal 0 0 not cal 00not cal HUMAN TRAFFICKING‐INVOLUNTARY SERV.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In Custody List **Total Inmates Does Not Include ICE Detainees **Current As Of: Total Inmates: 28 November 09, 2020 6:48 Am
    Freeborn Co Adult Detenton Center In Custody List **Total Inmates does not include ICE Detainees **Current as of: Total Inmates: 28 November 09, 2020 6:48 am Ashley, Nicholas Ryan Charge(s) Burglary-3rd Deg-Steal/Commit Felony or Gross Misd Intake Date: October 15, 2020 Intake Time: 1:05 pm Ba, La Charge(s) Drugs - 5th Degree - Possess Schedule 1,2,3,4 - Not Small Amount Marijuana Domestic Abuse - Violate Order for Intake Date: November 01, 2020 Protection Intake Time: 12:21 am Boots-Ringoen, Dominik Nikko Charge(s) Criminal Vehicular Homicide - Operate Vehicle with Negligence - Under Influence Alcohol Intake Date: August 27, 2020 Traffic - DWI - Operate Motor Vehicle - Alcohol Concentration 0.08 Within 2 Intake Time: 10:31 pm Hours Disorderly Conduct-Brawling or Fighting Criminal Vehicular Operation - Great Bodily Harm - Gross Negligence Traffic-Drivers License-Driving After Revocation Traffic - Underage drinking and driving; Crime described Burt, Adam Robert Charge(s) Assault-3rd Degree-Substantial Bodily Harm Traffic - DWI - First-Degree DWI;w/in Intake Date: February 14, 2020 10 yrs of 3 or more qualified prior impaired driving incidents Intake Time: 4:43 pm Page 1 of 6 Everet, Michael Leonard Charge(s) Harassment; Restraining Order - Violate and knows of temporary or restraining order Intake Date: November 06, 2020 Intake Time: 5:53 pm Fishel, Adam Dwayne Charge(s) Fleeing a Peace Officer in a Motor Vehicle Traffic - DWI - Operate Motor Vehicle - Intake Date: November 01, 2020 Alcohol Concentration 0.08 Within 2 Hours Intake Time:
    [Show full text]
  • Fire and Arson Scene Evidence: a Guide for Public Safety Personnel
    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice FireFire andand ArsonArson SceneScene Evidence:Evidence: A Guide for Public Safety Personnel Research Report U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs 810 Seventh Street N.W. Washington, DC 20531 Janet Reno Attorney General Daniel Marcus Acting Associate Attorney General Mary Lou Leary Acting Assistant Attorney General Julie E. Samuels Acting Director, National Institute of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice World Wide Web Site World Wide Web Site http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij Fire and Arson Scene Evidence: A Guide for Public Safety Personnel Written and Approved by the Technical Working Group on Fire/Arson Scene Investigation June 2000 NCJ 181584 Julie E. Samuels Acting Director David G. Boyd, Ph.D. Deputy Director Richard M. Rau, Ph.D. Project Monitor Opinions or points of view expressed in this document represent a consensus of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Justice. The National Institute of Justice is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Assistance, the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and the Office for Victims of Crime. Message From the Attorney General ctions taken at the outset of an investigation at a fire and Aarson scene can play a pivotal role in the resolution of a case. Careful, thorough investigation is key to ensuring that potential physical evidence is not tainted or destroyed or potential witnesses overlooked.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CRIME of ARSON Paul Sadler, Jr
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 41 | Issue 3 Article 4 1950 The rC ime of Arson Paul Jr. Sadler Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Paul Jr. Sadler, The rC ime of Arson, 41 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 290 (1950-1951) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. THE CRIME OF ARSON Paul Sadler, Jr. The following article is from a thesis the author prepared while pursuing his studies in Social Relations at Harvard University, from which he received his A.B. degree in June, -1950. Mr. Sadler is currently employed as a fire investigator adjuster for the General Adjustment Bureau, Inc., Boston, Mass.-EDrroR. I The crime of arson is an extraordinarily complex one by its definition alone. Its complexity makes many difficulties to the student. It also gives the perpetrator some advantages. To begin with, arson, like murder and most admirality crimes, exists in several degrees of indict- ment. These degrees are wholly dependent upon the type and use of the structure or property burned, degree of involvement of participants, and often the time of day in which the crime is committed.' But what degrees now exist are only created by modern statutory defini- tion over and above the original common law of England, which law, in comparison with 20th century statutes, seems very defective in scope.
    [Show full text]
  • Should Commission of a Contemporaneous Arson, Burglary
    Santa Clara Law Review Volume 49 | Number 1 Article 1 2009 Should Commission of a Contemporaneous Arson, Burglary, Kidnapping, Rape, or Robbery Be Sufficient to Make a Murderer Eligible for a Death Sentence? - An Empirical and Normative Analysis David McCord Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation David McCord, Should Commission of a Contemporaneous Arson, Burglary, Kidnapping, Rape, or Robbery Be Sufficient to Make a Murderer Eligible for a Death Sentence? - An Empirical and Normative Analysis, 49 Santa Clara L. Rev. 1 (2009). Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview/vol49/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Santa Clara Law Review by an authorized administrator of Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SHOULD COMMISSION OF A CONTEMPORANEOUS ARSON, BURGLARY, KIDNAPPING, RAPE, OR ROBBERY BE SUFFICIENT TO MAKE A MURDERER ELIGIBLE FOR A DEATH SENTENCE?-AN EMPIRICAL AND NORMATIVE ANALYSIS By David McCord* INTRODUCTION Most death penalty jurisdictions make a murderer death- eligible if the murder was committed contemporaneously with one of five felonies: arson, burglary, kidnapping, rape, or robbery.1 In recent years, however, this traditional approach has been challenged by two blue-ribbon panels-the Illinois Commission on Capital Punishment and the Massachusetts Governor's Council on Capital Punishment-both of which advocated abolition of these five felonies as death-eligibility aggravators.2 The stakes in this debate are high because these five felonies-hereinafter "the contemporaneous felonies"-are frequent companions of murder: over sixty percent of death-eligible defendants contemporaneously commit at least one of them,3 and robbery alone qualifies more murderers for death-eligibility than any other * Professor of Law, Drake University Law School; J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Juvenile Firesetting: a Research Overview
    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention J. Robert Flores, Administrator May 2005 Of fice of Justice Pr ograms • Par tnerships for Safer Communities • www.ojp.usdoj.gov Juvenile Firesetting: A Message From OJJDP A Research Overview In the hands of children, fire can be a destructive force. Each year, fires set by youth claim hundreds of lives and destroy millions of dollars’ worth of Charles T. Putnam and John T. Kirkpatrick property. By understanding how and why juve­ The consequences of juvenile firesetting following project goals. First, review the niles set fires, professionals and policy- can be tragic and costly. In a typical year, existing research literature on juvenile fire- makers can make informed decisions fires set by children and youth claim the setting behavior and offer a distillation of about how best to address this harmful lives of approximately 300 people and that literature. Second, convene a confer­ behavior. destroy more than $300 million worth of ence of researchers and fire, justice, and In 2002, the National Association of property. Children are the predominant clinical professionals to provide a forum State Fire Marshals (NASFM) began for constructive discussion about existing victims of these fires, accounting for 85 developing applied research initiatives of every 100 lives lost (U.S. Fire Adminis­ and future research. Third, deliver a report to help professionals curtail juvenile tration, 1997, 2004). to NASFM in April 2003 outlining pressing firesetting. The project included a areas of new research that would directly review of the research literature, a A thorough understanding of juvenile benefit the professional community.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Residential Arson National Arson Awareness Week Media Kit May 5-11, 2013 2013 Arson Awareness Week: “Reducing Residential Arson.”
    U.S. Fire Administration Reducing Residential Arson National Arson Awareness Week Media Kit May 5-11, 2013 2013 Arson Awareness Week: “Reducing Residential Arson.” The U.S. Fire Administration (USFA) and its partners Excitement will use the week of May 5-11 to focus public attention on residential arson and provide communities with Most excitement fires are nuisance fires but may esca- tools to reduce the incidence of this crime. The goal late to homes. Excitement-motivated arsonists desire for this year’s Arson Awareness Week is to provide the thrill associated with setting the fire and relish the all residents with strategies to combat arson in their attention it brings. They rarely intend to injure people neighborhoods. but don’t have the requisite knowledge to keep the fires under control. Reducing Residential Arson: Why Arson? Revenge The motivations behind the burning of homes are curiosity, vandalism, concealing another crime, excite- According to the National Center for the Analysis of ment, revenge and insurance fraud or arson for profit. Violent Crime, the most common motive (41 percent) for a serial arsonist is revenge. An arsonist will target Curiosity the home of someone in retaliation for an actual or perceived injustice against him or her. Curiosity fires are most often set by juveniles. The mis- use of fire has many variables including age, motivation Insurance Fraud or Arson for Profit for firesetting behavior, type of fires set, ignition materi- als used to set the fire, and the child’s understanding and Arson for profit is insurance fraud, a criminal method limitations of fire.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Felony Murder Rule: Purpose and Effect
    The American Felony Murder Rule: Purpose and Effect Daniel Ganz 21090905 UC Berkeley, Spring 2012 Legal Studies Honors Thesis Supervised by Professor Richard Perry Ganz 1 I. Abstract Most US states have a felony murder rule, which allows prosecutors to charge felons with murder for any death that occurs during and because of the commission of the felony. This allows the felon to be convicted with murder without requiring the prosecution to prove the mens rea that would otherwise be necessary for a murder conviction. Much of the legal scholarship indicates that the purpose of the felony murder rule is to deter felonies and to make felons limit their use of violence while they're committing the felony by making the felon internalize more fully the negative consequences of their actions. It's unclear whether legislatures that adopt felony murder rules are more concerned with deterring criminal behavior or making criminals less violent when committing felonies. We analyze judicial decisions to infer what judges believed were the intentions of the legislatures that adopted felony murder statutes. We also use regression analysis to determine whether felony murder statutes are correlated with lower crime rates or lower rates of the average number of deaths that occur during felonies. We do this both by modeling felony rates and rates of felony- related deaths as a function of whether a state has a felony murder rule, and by determining how felony rates and rates of felony-related deaths change when a state adopts or abolishes a felony murder rule. Our results indicate that the felony murder rule does not have a significant effect on crime rates or crime-related death rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Statutes of Limitation for Prosecution of Offenses Against Children (Last Updated August 2012)
    Statutes of Limitation for Prosecution of Offenses Against Children (last updated August 2012) This compilation includes statutes that establish, toll, extend, or eliminate time limitations for charging criminal offenses relating specifically to child victims. Every statute included either specifically mentions child victims or makes reference to a statute that does. This is not a statutory compilation of all criminal statute of limitations laws. General statutes of limitations that apply to all crimes without specific reference to the age of the victim or children as a class of victims are omitted. Please feel free to contact NDAA for help in ensuring compliance with all of your jurisdiction’s applicable statutes of limitation. Table of Contents: TABLE OF CONTENTS:............................................................................................................................................... 1 ALABAMA .................................................................................................................................................................... 4 ALA. CODE § 15-3-5 (2012). Offenses having no limitation.....................................................................................4 ALASKA ........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 ALASKA STAT. § 12.10.010 (2012). General time limitations...................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Client Intake Form
    Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community of the Trinidad Rancheria Tribal Victim Assistance Program Client Intake 1) Client Information: ☐ Primary Victim ☐ Secondary Victim ☐ Non-Victim Name: __________________________________________________________________ Address: __________________________________________________________________ DOB: ___________ Age ______ Gender Identity: ☐ M ☐ F ☐ Other: ___________ Phone: __________________ Okay to leave a message at this number ☐ Yes ☐ No Emergency Contacts: ______________________________________________________ Name Phone Relationship ______________________________________________________ Name Phone Relationship Race/Ethnicity (check all that apply) ☐ AI/AN ☐ Hispanic/Latino ☐ Black/African American ☐ Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander ☐ Asian ☐ White (Non-Latino) ☐ Other Race ☐ Multiple Races Enrolled Tribal Member: ☐ Yes ☐ No If yes, which Tribe: _________________________ 2) Initial Victimization Type: Indicate the primary victimization with a “P” all others with a check mark ☐ Adult physical assault (1) ☐ Human trafficking: Labor (16) ☐ Human trafficking: Sex (17) ☐ Adult sexual assault (2) ☐ Identity theft/fraud/financial crime (18) ☐ Adults sexually abused/assaulted as children (3) ☐ Kidnapping (non-custodial) (19) ☐ Arson (4) ☐ Bullying (verbal, cyber or physical) (5) ☐ Kidnapping (custodial) (20) ☐ Mass violence (domestic/international) (21) ☐ Burglary (6) ☐ Other vehicular victimization (e.g., hit and run) ☐ Child physical abuse or neglect (7) (22) ☐ Child pornography (8) ☐ Robbery (23) ☐
    [Show full text]
  • ARSON in the FOURTH DEGREE (Recklessly Damaging Property by Fire Or Explosion) Penal Law § 150.05 (Committed on Or After Sept
    ARSON IN THE FOURTH DEGREE (Recklessly Damaging Property by Fire or Explosion) Penal Law § 150.05 (Committed on or after Sept. 1, 1979) The (specify) count is Arson in the Fourth Degree. Under our law, a person is guilty of Arson in the Fourth Degree when that person recklessly damages a building [or motor vehicle] by intentionally starting a fire [or causing an explosion]. The following terms used in that definition have a special meaning: A person RECKLESSLY damages a building [or motor vehicle]: when that person does so by engaging in conduct which creates or contributes to a substantial and unjustifiable risk that such damage will occur, and when he or she is aware of and consciously disregards that risk, and when the risk is of such nature and degree that disregarding it constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of conduct that a reasonable person would observe in the situation.1 [NOTE: Add if appropriate: A person who creates such a risk but is unaware of it solely by reason of his or her voluntary intoxication also acts recklessly.2] 1 See Penal Law § 15.05(3); People v. Boutin, 75 NY2d 692, 696 (1990). 2 See Penal Law § 15.05(3); People v. Boutin, 75 NY2d 692, 696 (1990). [NOTE: Add, where appropriate: In addition to its ordinary meaning, the term BUILDING includes any structure, vehicle or watercraft used for overnight lodging of persons, or used by persons for carrying on business therein.3] [NOTE: Add, where appropriate: MOTOR VEHICLE includes every vehicle operated or driven upon a public highway which is propelled by any power other than muscular power.4] A person DAMAGES A BUILDING [or MOTOR VEHICLE] when that person causes the slightest damage to the building [or motor vehicle].
    [Show full text]
  • Cap. 16 Tanzania Penal Code Chapter 16 of the Laws
    CAP. 16 TANZANIA PENAL CODE CHAPTER 16 OF THE LAWS (REVISED) (PRINCIPAL LEGISLATION) [Issued Under Cap. 1, s. 18] 1981 PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY THE GOVERNMENT PRINTER, DARES SALAAM Penal Code [CAP. 16 CHAPTER 16 PENAL CODE Arrangement of Sections PARTI General Provisions CHAPTER I Preliminary 1. Short title. 2. Its operation in lieu of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Saving of certain laws. CHAPTER II Interpretation 4. General rule of construction. 5. Interpretation. CHAPTER III Territorial Application of Code 6. Extent of jurisdiction of local courts. 7. Offences committed partly within and partly beyond the jurisdiction, CHAPTER IV General Rules as to Criminal Responsibility 8. Ignorance of law. 9. Bona fide claim of right. 10. Intention and motive. 11. Mistake of fact. 12. Presumption of sanity^ 13. Insanity. 14. Intoxication. 15. Immature age. 16. Judicial officers. 17. Compulsion. 18. Defence of person or property. 18A. The right of defence. 18B. Use of force in defence. 18C. When the right of defence extends to causing abath. 19. Use of force in effecting arrest. 20. Compulsion by husband. 21. Persons not to be punished twice for the same offence. 4 CAP. 16] Penal Code CHAPTER V Parties to Offences 22. Principal offenders. 23. Joint offences. 24. Councelling to commit an offence. CHAPTER VI Punishments 25. Different kinds of punishment. 26. Sentence of death. 27: Imprisonment. 28. Corpora] punishment. 29. Fines. 30. Forfeiture. 31. Compensation. 32. Costs. 33. Security for keeping the peace. 34. [Repealed]. 35. General punishment for misdemeanours. 36. Sentences cumulative, unless otherwise ordered. 37. Escaped convicts to serve unexpired sentences when recap- 38.
    [Show full text]
  • View the Slip Opinion(S)
    FILED AUGUST 14, 2018 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) No. 35295-1-III Respondent, ) ) v. ) ) BRYAN JACOB STORMS, ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION ) Appellant. ) FEARING, J. — This appeal requires us to address the prerogatives of the trial court when resentencing an offender on directions from the Court of Appeals when an error occurred in the initial sentence. We hold that the trial court did not engage in vindictiveness when resentencing appellant Bryan Storms and that Storms’ sentencing counsel did not engage in ineffective assistance of counsel when advocating during resentencing. Therefore, we affirm the sentence imposed by the trial court during remand. FACTS On February 10, 2013, Bryan Storms sped from a pursuing police officer. State v. Storms, No. 32653-5-III (Wash. Ct. App. Jan. 31, 2017) (unpublished), http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/326535_unp.pdf. Storms ran through a stop sign in his Honda Civic, smashed into a pickup truck, and sent the truck into the air before it No. 35295-1-III State v. Storms struck a telephone pole. The driver of the pickup truck died at the scene. Storms’ two passengers, Ron Martel and Lynn Blumer, suffered injuries. Storms fled the collision scene on foot. PROCEDURE The State of Washington charged Bryan Storms with vehicular homicide, two counts of vehicular assault, failure to remain at the scene of an accident-fatality (hit and run) and third degree driving while license suspended. Vehicular homicide, under RCW 46.61.520, constitutes a three alternative means crime.
    [Show full text]