BULTFONTEINITE FROM CRESTMORE, CALIFORNIA

Josneu Munoocu, Univers,ityoJ CaliJornia at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Cal iJorn i a.

AssrRlcr The rare bultfonteinite has been found in the contact zone at Cresrmore, California, in association with and . It occurs with these as microscopic, twinned individuals, much finer grained than the enclosing . Opticai and micro- chemical observations indicated that it is bultfonteinite, and this is confirmed by r-ray powder pattern, which matches that of the t1'pe material. This is the first locality for this mineral outside of South Africa The powder pattern shows the following spacings and intensities for the strongest lines: 8.16 A-7; 3.51 A-5; 3.+O A-5; 2.92 A-1O;2.385 A-10; -1.93 A-10. X-ray measurements on a crystal sliver from the type locality give cell-dimensions and ansles as follows: ao:8.34A bo:11.18A co:5.68A I:88'24/ p :86" 06' v:90o 00' These agree very closely with morphological measurements by Wright, provided his o and b axes are exchanged, and the value for the new D axis is doubled. The transformation formula, Wright to Murdoch is0I0/20O/0f1. The rare mineral Bultfonteinite was discoveredabout 1903 or 1904 in the Bultfontein mine, in the Kimberley District, South Africa. Several years later it appeared in the Dutoitspan mine in the same district, and shortly before 1932 it was found also at the Jagersfontein mine in the Orange River Colony, somehundred miles southeastof Kimberley. When first collected, it was thought to be , but was later recognized by A. F. Williams as a new mineral, and as such described by Parry, Williams, and Wright (1932). It is a hydrous, fluorine-bearing calcium silicate,close to 11Ca(OH, F)z.5SiOzin composition,and quite similar in many properties to afwillite. The new mineral was originally called dutoitspanite, Williams (1932, p. 171), but later changed to bultfon- teinite. On examining some specimensof massive afwillite, and later also of scawtite, from the 910' level of the Commercial quarry at Crestmore, California, the writer observed some patches and stringers of a fine- grained, sugary-textured material in the coarser matrix. This suggested a difierent mineral, and microscopic examination showed these areas to be composed of a granular aggregate of stout prismatic grains showing multiple twinning like that of a plagioclase. Selected material showed them to be biaxial positive with 2V near 70o and with a beta index close to 1.59. Grains with sharply defined twin lamellae showed a symmetrical extinction angle of 27-280. Microchemical tests gave CaO, SiOz, HzO and F. Leaching with water produced an alkaline solution. These properties correspond with those of bultfonteinite, which is easily dis- 900 BULFONTEINITE FROM CRESTMORE. CALIFORNIA 901

tinguished from the optically similar custerite by the extinction angle, which in the latter is only about 60 (Tilley 1928), and from afwillite which does not have multiple twinning. Incidentally, the fluorine noted by Switzer and Bailey (1954) in their anaiysisof afwillite from Crestmore, was probably due to the unsuspected presenceof bultfonteinite, since there is no practical difference, other than grain size, in appearancebe- tween the two minerais. A thin section of one massiveafwillite-buitfonteinite vein showed that the latter mineral occurs as an irregular stringer roughly along the center line of the vein, in part replacing afwillite. This relationship is shown in the photomicrograph(Fig. 1), taken with crossednicols.

X-Rav Srupv A good r-ray powder photograph was obtained from the Crestmore material, showing a distribution of spacingand intensities which matched no published pattern. Fortunately, through the kindness of Professor C. E. Tilley of Cambridge University, a little of the type mineral from South Africa was made available, and a referencepattern recorded. The two patterns showed a closecorrespondence, with the exception of a few lines in the Crestmore film'which could be accounted for by the presence of a small amount of impurity in the sample. All bultfonteinite lines down to a spacing oI 2.45 A have been readily indexed, using the unit cell data given below. Table 1 lists the powder data, using the average of several Crestmore specimens,and compared with the type material.

Frc. 1. Vein of bultfonteinite in afwillite. Magnification shown by .2 mm. scale. Crossed nicols, showing multiple twinning. 902 JOSEPH MURDOCH

Tenrn 1. X-Rav PowonR DATA lon BulmonrBrMTE. IRoN Rnorlrror. Meruolxnsn Frrmn, rN Axcsrnou UNrrs. FeKo:1.9373

Crestmore South Africa

d/z measured df n measwed dfn calcul. to.29 11.18 010 8.16 8.12 6 8 .33 100 6.53 6.51 2 6.71 110 5.46 5.47 2 5.59 020 4.t6 2W 4.065 4.06 4.14 111 t 3.98 3.95 2 4.02 02r 3.83 3.89 02l 3.65 3.636 I 3.69 12r 3 .59 3.60 I 3.615 12T 3.51 3.50 A 3.48 t2l 3.46 3.M A 3.44 20r 3.40 130 I 1 J.JJ 2 3 .33 t 3.34 220 J.JJ/ 2Ir I I J.Zl 2 3.26 3.268 2rr 3.2M 201 3.11 2 3.111 2Tr ,o, 10 2.92 6 2 .958 21t 2 .885 10 2.88 6 2.913 22r 2.825 4 2.825 2 2.834 22r 2.78 4 2.77 4 2.785 22r 2.77s 300 2.7s 2.743 3 2.757 oT2 2.72 ,1 2.72 2 2.718 0t2 I I 2.625 , 2.634 2 2.637 l40,Ttz I 2.48 2 2.467 041 I 2.4s 2 2.Ml 23t 1 1 2.355 2 2.36 2 2.34 I 2.333 1 2.28 1 2.272 t 2.2t 1 t 2.19 2 2.195 .t 2.12 J 2.093 2 2.118 2.037 2.037 5 1.99 J 1.988 2 I 1 1.956 2 1.953 2 1.93 8 1.93 10 I 1 t.9t 2 t.9t2 t 1.89 T 1.887 2 I I I .855 2 |.847 2 r.73 1 1.751 I I 1.729 2 1.714 J 1.709 1 1.687 1.686 2 I 1.667 1.665 2 1.63 1.638 J I 1.614 2 1.60 1.60 I

1.54 1.541 2 t.48 t.487 2 1.426 1.413 ) r.375 r.371 1 1.35 1.348 2 1.31 1.306 1 t.o7 t.074 1 BALFONTEINITD FROM CRESTMORE, CALIFORNIA 903

Tasrr 2. Bur-rloNrowrm ANcr,r Tanle Triclinic; Pinacoidal1. a:b:c:0.7461:1:0.5078,a:91o36,, g:93o53,, t:g9"54i,, !o:Qo:rn:Q.$$p5:05067:1. X:88'24', p:86oO6', v:9O"00', fo':0.6823, 96':0.5081, to' : 0.06815,lo' : 0.0280.

Forms

old New

001 , 001 67"40' 4"731 86006' 88"24', 0.00' 100 6 010 000 9000 9000 000 8824 010 a 100 90 00 90 00 000 9000 8606 210 140 1834+ 90 00 71 25+ r8 344 87 14i 110 120 33 53 m 00 56 07 33 5s 86 29+ 120 m 170 53 20 90 00 36 40 53 20 85 55 140 2m to 25 90 00 20 2s 1r0 25 86 54; 120 M rT0 12640 90 00 36 40 12640 87 55 1r0 120 14607 90 00 56 07 14607 88 09 210 r40 16125+ 90 00 712si 16125+ 89M r02 w 071 715 2823 8633+ 6152 2632 101 02r 3 42 46 34 8719 4333 Msr 102 w 0Ir 17155 2552 8629 11535+ 2508 T01 02r 17605+ 45 00+ 87 141 13452 46 281 011 e 101 87 52 36 55 5306+ 88 43 33 00 0T1 E T01 -87 23 31 35 r2133 88 38 35 26 r12 122 3722 3400 70 10 63s7 30 251 2tl r4r 20 01 65 29 7t 51 31 15 624I 111 r2r 35 42i s2 07+ 62 33 50 08 48 35 111 r2r r42 47 51 08 6r M 12819 50 10 lIl l2t -30 28 50271, 11301 48 20i 5111 111 r2r -148 08 49 19 11336 13006 5246

Transformationformula: Parry, Williams, Wright to Murdoch010/200/001.

None of the Crestmore mineral was other than microscopic in grain size, but the type specimen from Professor Tilley was in the form of coarsely crystalline prismatic fragments. From these it was possible to select a relatively simple appearing sliver, which could be rather readily oriented on the d-axis, and since no rl-ray determinative work had been done on the mineral, it was decided to see whether a satisfactory cell- determination could be made. Accordingly, a rotation photograph, and equator, first and second layer-line pictures, all about the prism-axis, were taken with filtered copper radiation. These pictures were successful,and the reciprocal lattice plotted from the layer-lines showed a consistent pattern which appeared to be mono- clinic. However, since Wright's optical study showed the mineral to be triclinic, this must be pseudomonoclinic,with V:90o (within the limits of measurement).Twinning on both (100) and (010), is shown by the JOSEPH MURDOCH presenceof quadruplicate points on the plot, matching those shown by Wright (1932,p.154), in the gnomonicprojection of forms. Cell dimensions,measured on the rotation picture for c6,and calculated from the Iayer line pictures for oo and bs, are as follows: oo:8.34 A, b0: 11.18A, ,o:5.68 A, whichreduce to an axialratio of 0.746I:1 :0.5078. On comparing this ratio with the morphological data it is seen that agreement is very close, if Wright's a ar,d b axes are exchangedand the new 6 axis taken at twice his value.

Parry,Williams & Wrightoriginal: 0.6756:1:0'6873 Parry,Williams & Wrightre-valued: 0'7401 :1:0.5087 Murdochfrom r-ray: 0.7461:1:0.5078

The crystallographic work done on rather poorly terminated crystals, was remarkably accurate, and the newly chosen setting has been made on the basis of the r-ray findings, and to place the pole of (001) in the normally accepted triclinic position, i.e. forward and to the right of center in the gnomonic projection. The following Table 2 gives the re- vised crystallographic constants for the new position, the original forms, the new angles for reported forms, and the translation formula from old to new orientation. The author wishesparticularly to expresshis thanks to ProfessorC. E. Tilley, without whose kindness the measurementsof cell dimensionsand form would not have been possible. RBronnxcrs Tnr-nv, C. E. (1928), On a custerite-bearingcontact rock from California: Geol.Mag.,65, 37t-372. Wrr-r,raus,A. F., (1932),The genesisof the diamondI, 352pp. E. Benn,London. Pennv, J., Wrr,r.raus,A. F., ewo Wmcnr, F.E., (1932),On bultfonteinite' a new fluorine- bearinghydrous calcium silicatefrom South Africa: Mineral' Mag,23, 145-162' Swrrznn, Groncn, .LNoBnu,nv, B. H. (1954),AJwillite from Crestmore,Calitornia: Am. Mineral.,38,629433.

Manuscri,plreceined Oct. 23, 1954