Lemlair House, Near Dingwall Archaeological Watching Brief Data Structure Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Marriage Notices from the Forres Gazette 1837-1855
Moray & Nairn Family History Society Marriage Notices from the Forres Gazette 18371837----1818181855555555 Compiled by Douglas G J Stewart No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the Moray & Nairn Family History Society . Copyright © 2015 Moray & Nairn Family History Society First published 2015 Published by Moray & Nairn Family History Society 2 Table of Contents Introduction & Acknowledgements .................................................................................. 4 Marriage Notices from the Forres Gazette: 1837 ......................................................................................................................... 7 1838 ......................................................................................................................... 7 1839 ....................................................................................................................... 10 1840 ....................................................................................................................... 11 1841 ....................................................................................................................... 14 1842 ....................................................................................................................... 16 1843 ...................................................................................................................... -
International Passenger Survey, 2008
UK Data Archive Study Number 5993 - International Passenger Survey, 2008 Airline code Airline name Code 2L 2L Helvetic Airways 26099 2M 2M Moldavian Airlines (Dump 31999 2R 2R Star Airlines (Dump) 07099 2T 2T Canada 3000 Airln (Dump) 80099 3D 3D Denim Air (Dump) 11099 3M 3M Gulf Stream Interntnal (Dump) 81099 3W 3W Euro Manx 01699 4L 4L Air Astana 31599 4P 4P Polonia 30699 4R 4R Hamburg International 08099 4U 4U German Wings 08011 5A 5A Air Atlanta 01099 5D 5D Vbird 11099 5E 5E Base Airlines (Dump) 11099 5G 5G Skyservice Airlines 80099 5P 5P SkyEurope Airlines Hungary 30599 5Q 5Q EuroCeltic Airways 01099 5R 5R Karthago Airlines 35499 5W 5W Astraeus 01062 6B 6B Britannia Airways 20099 6H 6H Israir (Airlines and Tourism ltd) 57099 6N 6N Trans Travel Airlines (Dump) 11099 6Q 6Q Slovak Airlines 30499 6U 6U Air Ukraine 32201 7B 7B Kras Air (Dump) 30999 7G 7G MK Airlines (Dump) 01099 7L 7L Sun d'Or International 57099 7W 7W Air Sask 80099 7Y 7Y EAE European Air Express 08099 8A 8A Atlas Blue 35299 8F 8F Fischer Air 30399 8L 8L Newair (Dump) 12099 8Q 8Q Onur Air (Dump) 16099 8U 8U Afriqiyah Airways 35199 9C 9C Gill Aviation (Dump) 01099 9G 9G Galaxy Airways (Dump) 22099 9L 9L Colgan Air (Dump) 81099 9P 9P Pelangi Air (Dump) 60599 9R 9R Phuket Airlines 66499 9S 9S Blue Panorama Airlines 10099 9U 9U Air Moldova (Dump) 31999 9W 9W Jet Airways (Dump) 61099 9Y 9Y Air Kazakstan (Dump) 31599 A3 A3 Aegean Airlines 22099 A7 A7 Air Plus Comet 25099 AA AA American Airlines 81028 AAA1 AAA Ansett Air Australia (Dump) 50099 AAA2 AAA Ansett New Zealand (Dump) -
Strathpeffer Community Council
Strathpeffer and District Community Action Plan 2019 – 2024 Strathpeffer and District Community Council with Strathpeffer Coordinating Group June 2019 e: [email protected] e: [email protected] STRATHPEFFER COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN 2019-2024 Table of Contents Table of Figures ....................................................................................................................................... ii 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Why a Community Action Plan for Strathpeffer and District? ............................................ 1 2 About the Strathpeffer and District Community ............................................................................ 3 2.1 Geography and Geology ...................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Population ........................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Heritage and sense of place ................................................................................................ 7 2.4 Natural environment........................................................................................................... 9 2.5 Access to services .............................................................................................................. 15 2.6 Employment and jobs ...................................................................................................... -
The Earldom of Ross, 1215-1517
Cochran-Yu, David Kyle (2016) A keystone of contention: the Earldom of Ross, 1215-1517. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/7242/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] A Keystone of Contention: the Earldom of Ross, 1215-1517 David Kyle Cochran-Yu B.S M.Litt Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Ph.D. School of Humanities College of Arts University of Glasgow September 2015 © David Kyle Cochran-Yu September 2015 2 Abstract The earldom of Ross was a dominant force in medieval Scotland. This was primarily due to its strategic importance as the northern gateway into the Hebrides to the west, and Caithness and Sutherland to the north. The power derived from the earldom’s strategic situation was enhanced by the status of its earls. From 1215 to 1372 the earldom was ruled by an uninterrupted MacTaggart comital dynasty which was able to capitalise on this longevity to establish itself as an indispensable authority in Scotland north of the Forth. -
Highland Licensing Board Functions Report 2019-20
The Highland Licensing Board Agenda 6 Item Meeting – 23 June 2020 Report HLB/036/20 No The Highland Licensing Board Functions Report 2019-20 Report by the Clerk to the Licensing Board Summary This report invites the Board to approve the Board’s third annual functions report for publication in accordance with section 9A of the Licensing (Scotland) Act 2005. 1. Background 1.1 The Air Weapons and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2015 amended the Licensing (Scotland) Act 2005 (“the Act”) to introduce a requirement that Licensing Boards produce and publish annual functions reports. 1.2 As a consequence, section 9A was inserted into the Act and came into force on 20 December 2017. 1.3 Section 9A of the Act states that the Board’s annual functions report must be prepared and published not later than 3 months after the end of each financial year. This means that the Board’s report for the financial year 2019-20 must be published, under normal circumstances, by no later than the end of June 2020. It is noted that under schedule 5 of the Coronavirus (Scotland) Act 2020 that a further 9 months is available to the Board if they are unable to publish their annual functions report by the end of June, due to a reason relating to coronavirus, but that is not required in this case. 1.4 The functions report must include- (a) a statement explaining how the Board has regard to- (i) the licensing objectives, and (ii) their licensing policy statement and any supplementary licensing policy statement (including the Board’s statement under section 7(1) (duty to assess -
County of Ross and Cromarty the Records of the County of Ross And
County of Ross and Cromarty The records of the County of Ross and Cromarty have been arranged and referenced as follows. CRC/1 Commissioners of Supply CRC/1/1 Commissioners of Supply: Ross CRC/1/2 Commissioners of Supply: Cromarty CRC/1/3 Sheriff’s Office/Prison Board CRC/2 Pre – 1890 Highway Authorities CRC/2/1 Highland Roads and Bridges: Reports CRC/2/2 Commissioners for Roads and Bridges: Minutes CRC/2/3 General Road Trustees – Minutes CRC/2/4-17 First to Fourteenth Districts Roads Trustees - Minutes CRC/3 County Clerk’s Department CRC/3/1 County Council and Committee Minutes CRC/3/1A Administrative Schemes etc. CRC/3/2 Education Committee CRC/3/3 Executive Committee CRC/3/4 Finance Committee CRC/3/5 Police Standing Joint Committee CRC/3/6 Police (Legalised Cells) Visiting Committee CRC/3/7 Road Board Committee CRC/3/8 Valuation Committee CRC/3/9 Public Assistance Committee and Sub-Committees CRC/3/10 Unallocated CRC/3/11 Loch Broom Special Water District Sub-Committees CRC/3/12 Planning Committee CRC/3/13 Invergordon / Balblair Joint Ferry Committee CRC/3/14 Unallocated CRC/3/15 Press Cuttings CRC/3/16 Ross / Sutherland Joint Police Committee CRC/3/17 Ross / Sutherland Joint Valuation Committee CRC/3/18 Licensing Court CRC/3/19 Register of Motor Cars County of Ross and Cromarty CRC/3/20 Ross and Cromarty Local Pension Committee CRC/3/21 Charitable Funds CRC/3/22 Ross & Cromarty Steering Group CRC/3/23 Photographs & Prints CRC/3/24 Miscellanea CRC/4 County Council - Treasurer's Department CRC/4/1 Abstracts of Accounts CRC/4/2 Valuation -
Third Party Reporting Centre See List
Appendix 2 What is Third Party Reporting? Recommendation 16 of the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry Report stated: “That all possible steps should be taken by Police Services at local level in consultation with local Government and other agencies and local communities to encourage the reporting of racist incidents and crimes. This should include: The ability to report at locations other than police stations; and The ability to report 24 hours a day” Giving members of the public this safe, confidential and supportive environment to report incidents in order to encourage a greater number of reports. Several organisations were approached by Police/nominated themselves as a Third Party reporting centre see list. However we are always keen to recruit and train more third party reporting centres so if you are interested, please let us know and contact [email protected] for more information. Role of Third Party Reporting Centre What’s expected of a third party reporting centre? • Provide a positive, confidential and supportive environment for the individual who reports. • Provide a link between the victim and the police after the report is made • Work with victim to access appropriate supports to deal with aftermath. What a Third Party Reporting site should expect from Police Scotland? • Acknowledgement from police when a Third Party Report is submitted. • A named contact within the local Police Division who can offer advice and liaison • Updates from police on progress on a Third Party report. • Regular opportunities to network with other Third Party reporting sites. Page 1. What is staff role in third party reporting centres? • Be familiar with mechanism for reporting • Don’t assume that victims don’t want to report • Explore options available for reporting incidents to the police with the person disclosing, including submitting through a third party and reporting anonymously. -
Inter-Agency Guidelines to Protect Children and Young People in Highland
Inter-agency Guidelines to Protect Children and Young People in Highland Highland Child Protection Committee Working Together to Protect Children in the Highlands March 2016. Inter-agency Guidelines to Protect Children and Young People in Highland Contents Foreword The Child Protection Register Introduction Sections: 1. Definitions 2. Collective responsibilities for Child Protection 3. The assessment of risk 4. Responding to children’s needs 5. After the Child Protection Plan Meeting 6. Concerns coming to the attention of Police Scotland 7. Responsibilities for health professionals 8. Responsibilities for schools (nursery, primary and secondary) and the Care and Learning Service (Education) and High Life Highland 9. Responsibilities of other agencies/organisations 10. The Child Protection Register and the role of the Keeper of the Register 11. Legislation to protect children 12. Special Circumstances 13. Going to Court Appendices: A. Constituent agencies of the Child Protection Committee B. Family Team Practice Leads for Care & Protection C. Further definitions D. My World Triangle E. Using the resilience matrix F. Standard child concern form (For use by all agencies except Police Scotland) G. Police Scotland sample Child Concern Form H. Medical Examinations I. Pupil transfer form J. Contact details for the armed forces K. Timescales for different stages of acting on Child Protection concerns L. VRI and joint interview M. Revised Prevent Duty Guidance: for Scotland March 2016 Page 1 of 118 Inter-agency Guidelines to Protect Children and Young People in Highland Foreword This is the 2015 update of “Inter-agency Guidelines to protect Children and Young People in Highland” and brings the existing guidelines in line with: “National Guidance for Child Protection in Scotland” (updated 2014), The Highland Practice Model guidance (updated 2015), further organisational and structural changes following the integration of Health and Social Care in 2012 in the Highlands, changes to the Children’s Hearings system and the creation of Police Scotland. -
Discovery & Excavation in Scotland
1991 DISCOVERY & EXCAVATION IN SCOTLAND An Annual Survey of Scottish Archaeological Discoveries. Excavation and Fieldwork EDITED BY COLLEEN E BATEY WITH JENNIFER BALL PUBLISHED BY THE COUNCIL FOR SCOTTISH ARCHAEOLOGY ISBN 0 901352 11 X ISSN 0419 -411X NOTES FOR CONTRIBUTORS 1 Contributions should be brief statements of work undertaken. 2 Each contribution should be on a separate page, typed or clearly hand-written and double spaced. Surveys should be submitted in summary form. 3 Two copies of each contribution are required, one for editing and one for NMRS. 4 The Editor reserves the right to shorten published contributions. The unabridged copy will be lodged with NMRS. 5 No proofs will be sent to Contributors because of the tight timetable and the cost. 6 Illustrations should be forwarded only by agreement with the Editor (and HS, where applicable). Line drawings should be supplied camera ready to suit page layout as in this volume. 7 Enquiries relating to published items should normally be directed to the Contributor, not the Editor. 8 The final date for receipt of contributions each year is 31 October, for publication on the last Saturday of February following. Contributions from current or earlier years may be forwarded at any time. 9 Contributions should be sent to Hon Editor, Discouery & Excavation in Scotland, CSA, c/o Royal Museum of Scotland, Queen Street, Edinburgh, EH2 1JD. Please use the following format:- REGION DISTRICT Site Name ( parish) Contributor Type of Site/Find NCR (2 letters, 6 figures) Report Sponsor: HS, Society, Institution, etc, as appropriate. Name of Contributor: (where more than one, please indicate which name should appear in the list of contributors) Address of main contributor. -
Remembering the Strathpeffer Area: 1. Jamestown
Remembering the Strathpeffer Area: 1. Jamestown During 2015 people gathered at Strathpeffer Community Centre and Achterneed Hall to remember the physical remains of the Strathpeffer area – Jamestown, Strathpeffer, the Heights, Achterneed and Milnain – focussing on buildings, sites, or monuments which were new, modified or no longer there. They built on previous sessions which had begun to look at Strathpeffer. Using old maps, photographs (some more than a century old), various printed sources, and memories spanning over 80 years, information about over 350 sites was gathered. Some pupils from the school joined us as well for Strathpeffer sessions as part of their project investigating World War II. This report summarises the results of the meetings focussing on Jamestown, with a few extra memories of places further west. The details have also been forwarded to heritage databases: the Highland Council Historic Environment Record (HER) (her.highland.gov.uk) and Historic Environment Scotland’s Canmore (canmore.org.uk) where they will provide valuable new information about the heritage of the area. The 2015 sessions were part of a project organised by ARCH and Strathpeffer Community Centre, and funded by the Heritage Lottery Fund and the Mackenzie New York Villa Trust. Funding for the smaller projects in previous years was provided by Generations Working Together and High Life Highland. Thanks also to the Highland Museum of Childhood for allowing us to see text panels from their 2009 ‘Hands Across the Sea’ exhibition. But most of all thanks to everyone who has shared their memories and photographs, often braving difficult weather. Any additions or corrections should be sent to ARCH at [email protected] or The Goods Shed, The Old Station, Strathpeffer, IV14 9DH. -
Authority: SNH 23/11/2018
Karen Eastwood Registry Department Scottish Environment Protection Agency Graesser House Fodderty Way Dingwall IV15 9XB 21st November 2018 Your ref: CAR/L/1169751 & CAR/L/1169752 Our ref: CNS/CAR/NINH-Orkney (CLC152431&CLC152432) By e-mail only to: registrydingwall@sepa. org.uk Dear Karen Water Environment ( Controlled Activities) (Scotland) Regulations 2011 Application for CAR Authorisation for Yinstay East/West, Shapinsay Sound, Orkney Thank you for your email of 18th September consulting us on the above application and for the extension to these consultations. The applications are for two new fish farms at Yinstay East and Yinstay West. The proposals are to install new salmon fish farms comprising 14 x 120m and 12 x 120m circumference cages respectively, both with a central feed barge. Summary The proposals impact on Priority Marine Features (PMFs). The Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) should consider the effect of the proposals on the PMF(s) before it can be consented. We would like you to treat this advice as a ‘third party representation’ and give us the opportunity to consider your draft determination before you issue any licence. Background We appreciate and welcome the ongoing pre-application discussions had with Orkney Marine Farms Ltd prior to submission of the CAR applications. We encourage early engagement to help support good development in the right places. These proposals have not yet been subject to planning permission. Scottish Natural Heritage, Eastbank, East Road, Kirkwall, Orkney KW15 1LX Tel: 01463 701670 north@nature. scot www. nature. scot Natural heritage impacts; appraisal and advice National and internationally protected sites The proposed sites lie within the North Orkney pSPA designated for non-breeding wintering waders and divers and breeding Red-throated divers. -
722 the Edinburgh Gazette, November 18, 1873
722 THE EDINBURGH GAZETTE, NOVEMBER 18, 1873. deposited in the Private Bill Office of the House of uplift the sum' of £4073, with such interest as may Commons on or before the 21st day of December have accrued thereon, being the price of the pro- next. perty in Dundee, known as the' Ladywell Property,' belonging to and taken from the Magistrates by Dated this 14th day of November 1873. the Police Commissioners of Dundee, under and in H. & A. INGLIS, W.S., Edinburgh, terms of the provisions of the Dundee Police and Solicitors for the Bill. Improvement Act, 1871, and consigned in the Royal Bank of Scotland at Dundee, by the said MARTIN & LESLIE, Commissioners; and to apply the said sum in . 27 Abingdon Street, Westminster, payment pro tanto of the prices of properties pur- Parliamentary Agents. chased by the said Magistrates, and expenditure made in the improvements thereon, as follows, viz.:— POLLING PLACES IN THE COUNTIES OF 1. Wardlaw's Property, Overgate, £314 16 3 2. Donaldson's do. do., 464 9 3 ROSS AND CROMARTY. 8. Mudie's do. do., 266 7 9 4. Pullar's do. Murraygate, . 666 0 2 "OTICB is hereby given that the Sheriff of 5. Robertson's do. Vault, 1018 15 5 6. Jack's Cellar, St. Clement's Lane, . 123 14 6 Ross, Cromarty, and Sutherland proposes, 7. Town-house, addition and new Hall, 2264 1 0 with consent of Her Majesty's Advocate for Scot- 8. do. alteration Shops, 773 6 0 land, in terms of the 16th Viet., c. 28, sec.