4 an Introduction to Postmodernity

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

4 an Introduction to Postmodernity An Introduction to Postmodernity: Where Are We, How Did We Get Here, and Can We Get Home? Ted Cabal Ted Cabal is professor of philosophy Introduction ology, now sitting in judgement over at The Southern Baptist Theological As a student in seminary I had a friend Scripture rather than under it, became the Seminary. Dr. Cabal has served as the with severe amnesia as the result of a standard fare for seminarians preparing Dean of Boyce College, and has also serious bicycle accident. In spite of previ- to feed God’s flock.4 But at least we knew taught at Southwestern Baptist Theo- ous diligent work, he had forgotten large our enemies well, and with the intellec- logical Seminary and Dallas Baptist amounts of his seminary studies. And not tual reinvigoration of evangelicalism in University. He has written articles on recognizing his wife, he had to get to the twentieth century, it appeared that the philosophy and apologetics, and is cur- know her all over again. His disorienta- Lord had raised up a David to meet mod- rently working on a book on apologetics. tion could have been even worse, but ernity’s Goliath.5 his happy testimony was that he was anchored in still knowing Jesus! Where Are We? Many of us were also disoriented upon But after waking surprised that morn- waking one day to find that we no longer ing, we now discover the arrival of recognized the intellectual world around postmodernity. How different everything us. Someone informed us that we were looks! Instead of clashing only with a now living in postmodern times and had worldview giant (Naturalism) wielding been for some time, but it all seemed so the sword of a strong competing truth new and unfamiliar. Gratefully, we still claim, much of the world is now charac- knew Jesus, that He is the same forever; terized by “liquidity.”6 Permanence and but, living as a Christian in the strange solidity in social structures are now new world of postmodernity1 would bygone commodities, not to mention abid- demand adjustments in our thinking. ing values and the concept of truth. The Two decades ago we thought we knew new colossus is characterized by opposi- what it meant to live as thoughtful Chris- tion to epistemology, realism, essen- tians in modernity. It entailed active tialism, all forms of foundationalism, resistance to the manifestations of unbe- transcendental arguments and stand- lief that had arisen since the Enlighten- points, truth as correspondence, canoni- ment. Modern philosophy, no longer the cal descriptions, final vocabularies, and handmaid of theology, reveled in its newly meta-narratives.7 The new cognitive found autonomy to reason apart from atmosphere is charged with pessimism God’s revelation.2 Modern science, no regarding the possibility of modernity’s longer seeking to think God’s thoughts Holy Grail, scientia and veritas. Is this new after him, boasted that God was unneces- arrival on the intellectual scene a friend sary to understand either the universe or or foe? Is postmodernism providentially life’s deepest questions.3 Most insidious given to the Church as an ally against of all, modern biblical criticism and the- naturalism, or is it just one more philo- 4 sophical cycle of unbelief? the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative It is true that postmodernists and mod- Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity” to a ernists have no love lost between them postmodern journal, Social Text.9 The edi- because they disagree on so much. The tors, including postmodern luminaries modernist strives for certainty in knowl- such as Frederic Jameson and Andrew edge that the postmodernist does not Ross, published the article, thinking that believe possible. The postmodernist a physicist was presenting corroboration understands any experience of reality to from science for postmodernism. In the be thoroughly interpretative, whereas the article Sokal wrote: modernist cherishes objectivity. The mod- It has thus become increasingly ernist takes his standpoint as a knowing apparent that physical “reality,” no individual, but socially constructed reali- less than social “reality,” is at bot- ties are all the postmodernist will concede. tom a social and linguistic construct; that scientific “knowledge,” far from Western intellectual power centers, being objective, reflects and encodes long dominated by modernists, now the dominant ideologies and power acknowledge the growing influence of relations of the culture that pro- duced it; that the truth claims of sci- postmodernists. For example, Public ence are inherently theory-laden and Broadcasting Service television aired a self-referential; and consequently, brief series several years ago entitled “The that the discourse of the scientific community, for all its undeniable Nobel Legacy.” Nobel laureates in phys- value, cannot assert a privileged ics, chemistry, and medicine were featured epistemological status with respect to counter-hegemonic narratives describing the fascinating details of the emanating from dissident or mar- advances in knowledge of their disciplines ginalized communities.10 and the resultant benefits for humanity. This kind of programming is nothing new After the article was published, Sokal for PBS. But what is of special interest was published an exposé of the whole affair. the equal time provided a postmodernist As a self-confessed leftist and feminist, he (obviously not from the sciences, but from noted that he shared postmodernists’ lib- the humanities) to attack the sciences. She eral values. Nevertheless, Sokal felt their sought to emasculate modernist concepts emphasis on relativism surrendered the like “fact” and “progress,” and she did so intellectual high ground to the right wing. creatively (e.g., by walking through a He said he was angry desert while she spoke). The laureate in chemistry, on the other hand, prefaced his because most (though not all) of this silliness is emanating from the self- remarks with: “We didn’t invent chemis- proclaimed Left. We’re witnessing try, nature did.”8 Just a few years earlier, here a profound historical volte-face. it would have been unthinkable for PBS For most of the past two centuries, the Left has been identified with sci- to allow the citadel of modernity to be ence and against obscurantism; we taunted so rudely. believed that rational thought and Perhaps the classic skirmish between the fearless analysis of objective reality (both natural and social) are modernity and postmodernity is what is incisive tools for combating the mys- now referred to as the Sokal affair. Alan tifications promoted by the power- ful—not to mention being desirable Sokal, a physicist at New York University, human ends in their own right. The submitted a piece entitled “Transgressing recent turn of many “progressive” 5 or “leftist” academic humanists from well-established ways. To tra- and social scientists toward one or ditional eyes, a/theology doubtless another form of epistemic relativism appears to be irregular, eccentric, betrays this worthy heritage and and vagrant. At best it seems aim- undermines the already fragile less, at worst devious. Within this prospects for progressive social framework, a/theology is, in fact, critique. 11 heretical. For the a/theologian, how- ever, herresy [sic] and aimlessness are unavoidable. Ideas are never Even closer to home, postmodernism fixed but are always in transition; has made a significant impact upon phi- thus they are irrepressibly transi- 15 losophy and theology. Twentieth century tory. philosophical approaches have commonly Analytic philosophy has flourished in been classified either as continental or the Anglophone world. Unlike nineteenth analytic. Until recent decades, some century continental philosophy, it has degree of disdain was the norm between been characterized by rejection of (inten- these broad schools and their correlative tional) system building. Viewing itself as relationships to theology.12 But now, an extension of science, it has historically postmodernism has not only made focused on logic and careful reasoning, inroads but also caused divisions within and the way language is used. The post- each school. modernism that has grown in this soil has In earlier decades, continental philoso- generally been less radical than postmod- phy was closely associated with the likes ernism in continental philosophy, and of phenomenology, existentialism, struc- thus has had a less dramatic influence on turalism, and post-structuralism. The con- Anglo-American theology.16 Philosopher tinental tradition has produced what is Nancey Murphy is sympathetic to W. V. perhaps the most radical of all post- O. Quine’s view of the structure of knowl- modern philosophies, deconstruction. Its edge as a web where individual beliefs are father, Jacques Derrida, is now well held in relation to other beliefs and not in known for his skepticism about ground- relation to the world. She contends that ing the meaning of written texts because this rejection of modernity’s foundation- they are always marked by mediation, alism avoids the Scylla of continental rela- endless word play, the absence of signi- tivism and the Charybdis of modernist fier, or in short, différance.13 Derrida’s epistemological arrogance. She argues influence on theology is exemplified in the that this approach may enable the rap- work of Mark Taylor. Taylor’s work will prochement needed between liberal and seem strange to ordinary Christians both conservative Christianity.17 The most in liberal as well as conservative circles. prominent evangelical theologian to He elides the concept of truth altogether adopt a somewhat similar appropriation in favor of language sport.14 For example, of Anglo-postmodernity is Stan Grenz.18 after cavorting for almost a page through Nowhere are the effects of the Zeitgeist, a (dubious) etymology of “err,” Taylor however, more in evidence than in the says that as an “erring a/theologian” he popular religion of postmodernity, the asks errant questions and suggests New Age Movement (NAM). Postmodern responses that often seem erratic or relativism in general and the New Age even erroneous.
Recommended publications
  • 122520182414.Pdf
    Archive of SID University of Tabriz-Iran Journal of Philosophical Investigations ISSN (print): 2251-7960/ (online): 2423-4419 Vol. 12/ No. 24/ fall 2018 Postmodernism, Philosophy and Literature* Hossein Sabouri** Associate Professor, University of Tabriz, Iran Abstract No special definite definition does exist for postmodernism however it has had an inordinate effect on art, architecture, music, film, literature, philosophy, sociology, communications, fashion, and technology. The main body of this work can be seen as an admiration and reverence for the values and ideals associated with postmodern philosophy as well as postmodern literature. , I have argued that postmodern has mainly influenced philosophy and literature and they are recognized and praised for their multiplicity. Postmodernism might seem exclusive in its work, its emphasis on multiplicity and the decentered subject makes very uncomfortable reading for traditional theorists or philosophers. It rejects western values and beliefs as only small part of the human experience and it rejects such ideas, beliefs, culture and norms of the western. Integrity is fragmented apart into unharmonious narratives which lead to a shattering of identity and an overall breakdown of any idea of the self. Relativism and Self- reflexivity have replaced self-confidence due to the postmodern belief that all representation distorts reality. I have also referred that in a sense; postmodernism is a part of modernism we find the instantaneous coexistence of these two methods of expression and thinking, especially in visual arts and literature. Key words: Postmodernism, modernism, Philosophy, Literature, self, relativism, * Received date: 2018/07/15 Accepted date: 2018/09/26 ** E-mail: [email protected] www.SID.ir Archive of SID272/ Philosophical Investigations, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • The Palgrave Handbook of Posthumanism in Film and Television the Palgrave Handbook of Posthumanism in Film and Television
    The Palgrave Handbook of Posthumanism in Film and Television The Palgrave Handbook of Posthumanism in Film and Television Edited by Michael Hauskeller University of Exeter, UK Thomas D. Philbeck World Economic Forum, Switzerland Curtis D. Carbonell Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research, UAE Selection and editorial matter © Michael Hauskeller, Thomas D. Philbeck and Curtis D. Carbonell 2015 Individual chapters © Respective authors 2015 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2015 978-1-137-43031-1 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2015 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Postmodern Perspectives and Shifting Legal Paradigms: Searching for a Critical Theory of Juvenile Justice
    Postmodern Perspectives And Shifting Legal Paradigms: Searching For A Critical Theory Of Juvenile Justice Karen L. Michaelis Department of Educational Leadership & Counseling Psychology, Washington State University, USA Abstract The tension between law’s rationality, objectivity, abstraction and principle, and feminism’s irrationality, subjectivity, contextualisation and personal nature is at the core of attempts by critical legal theorists to define a legal system that seeks justice by giving voice and credibility to heretofore silenced members of groups historically excluded or penalised for their outsider status. Outsider and feminist legal scholars have tackled the difficult issues of exclusion embedded in the law. Outsider legal scholars contend that the sameness/difference debate perpetuates racial stereotypes that justify the law’s impact on members of racial groups by ignoring the impact varying contexts have on giving meaning to an event. Similarly, feminist legal scholars have advocated for a more conscientious legal system that considers community and multiple perspectives as a means of overcoming the bias women experience when they negotiate their way through the judicial system. Both of these perspectives provide a starting point for a less mechanistic, more personal and contextualised approach to juvenile justice. But unlike women and minorities, juveniles will never have the political power to force changes in the juvenile justice system. Therefore, the author proposes that a new critical theory of juvenile justice, based on elements of both feminist and outsider legal theories, is necessary to ensure that juveniles are treated fairly and appropriately based on their unique characteristics coupled with the particular context within which the legal issue to be resolved by the justice system arose.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophical Posthumanism and Its Others
    Ph.D. Dissertation The Posthuman: Philosophical Posthumanism and Its Others Ph.D. Candidate Francesca Ferrando Program Ph.D. in Philosophy and Theory of Human Sciences Università di Roma Tre 1 INDEX Introduction From Humans to Posthumans p. 11 1. Part 1 Philosophical Posthumanism and Its Others pp. 21-123 (What is Philosophical Posthumanism?) 1. Premises - the Politics of the “Post” p. 22 2. From Postmodern to Posthuman p. 25 3. Posthumanism and Its Others p. 30 4. Transhumanism and Techno-Reductionism p. 31 5. Posthuman Technologies p. 38 6. Antihumanism and The Übermensch 2 p. 44 7. Philosophical Posthumanism p. 49 (Of Which “Human” is the Posthuman a “Post”?) 8. The Semantics of the Post-Human p. 55 9. Humanizing p. 56 10. The Anthropological Machine p. 60 11. More or Less, Human p. 65 12. Technologies of the Self as Posthuman (Re)Sources p. 70 13. When and How did Humans become Human? p. 74 14. Humanitas p. 76 15. Homo sapiens 3 p. 79 (Have We Always Been Posthuman?) 16. Posthuman Life p. 84 a. Animate / Inanimate p. 84 b. Bios and Zoe p. 86 c. Artificial Life p. 88 17. Autopoiesis p. 91 18. Posthumanism is a Perspectivism p. 98 19. Evolving Species p. 19 20. Posthumanities p. 108 4 21. The Posthuman as New Materialisms p. 114 22. Vibrating Matter p. 120 23. The Posthuman Ontological Multiverse p. 124 2. Part 2 Philosophical Reflections on Empirical Data pp. 137-150 Is The Post-Human A Post-Woman? Robots, Cyborgs, Artificial Intelligence and the Futures of Gender: A Case Study 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Neo-Realism: Post-Postmodern Ethics and Metaphysics Cody Chun [email protected]
    University of Puget Sound Sound Ideas Summer Research Summer 2016 Neo-Realism: Post-Postmodern Ethics and Metaphysics Cody Chun [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/summer_research Part of the Literature in English, North America, Ethnic and Cultural Minority Commons Recommended Citation Chun, Cody, "Neo-Realism: Post-Postmodern Ethics and Metaphysics" (2016). Summer Research. Paper 272. http://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/summer_research/272 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Sound Ideas. It has been accepted for inclusion in Summer Research by an authorized administrator of Sound Ideas. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Neo-Realism: Post-Postmodern Ethics and Metaphysics Cody Chun1 I. Antirealism In his presentation “Reality as Unamendableness” at the conference “On the Ashes of Post- Modernism: A New Realism,” Maurizio Ferraris demonstrated the implausibility of Friedrich Nietzsche’s constructivist thesis “There are no facts, only interpretations” by suggesting that the statement weakens if “facts” is replaced by “cats.” Doubtful of postmodern philosophy, the conference prefigured the emergence of a new realism in the aftermath of postmodernism. In what follows, I consider post-postmodernism in terms of this neo-realist turn.2 Postmodern thought can be defined by its rejection of an objective reality, or a reality that exists apart from its being thought, in favor of an understanding of reality as the product of texts (Derrida), discourses (Foucault), interpretations (Nietzsche, Vattimo), and social constructs (Berger and Luckmann). Because it rejects the idea that the world exists objectively, postmodern thought is antirealist.3 In Realism and Anti-Realism, Stuart Brock and Edwin Mares define antirealism as the philosophy that denies that anything external to thought exists.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Modernity and Postmodernity in the Genesis of Transhumanism
    Cuadernos de Bioética ISSN: 1132-1989 bioé[email protected] Asociación Española de Bioética y Ética Médica España Pastor, Luis Miguel; García Cuadrado, José Ángel Modernity and postmodernity in the genesis of transhumanism-posthumanism Cuadernos de Bioética, vol. XXV, núm. 3, septiembre-diciembre, 2014, pp. 335-350 Asociación Española de Bioética y Ética Médica Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=87535786005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative CuadernosLUIS deMIGUE BioéticaL PASTOR XXV Y J 2014/3ªOSÉ ÁNGEL GARCÍA-CUADRADO MODERNIDAD Y POSTMODERNIDAD EN LA GÉNESIS DEL TRANSHUMANISMO-POSTHUMANISMO Copyright Cuadernos de Bioética MODERNIDAD Y POSTMODERNIDAD EN LA GÉNESIS DEL TRANSHUMANISMO-POSTHUMANISMO MODERNITY AND POSTMODERNITY IN THE GENESIS OF TRANSHUMANISM-POSTHUMANISM LUIS MIGUEL PASTOR Department of Cell Biology and Histology, Medical School, IMIB-Arrixaca, Regional Campus of International Excellence Campus Mare Nostrum, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain. [email protected] JOSÉ ÁNGEL GARCÍA CUADRADO Ecclesiastical Faculty of Philosophy Philosophical Anthropology. Universidad de Navarra [email protected] Abstract: Keywords: There are various authors who, within the realm of bioethics, propose as a model of the human being, Transhumanism, a man who is enhanced, transhuman or even posthuman. The philosophical roots of these bioethical posthumanism, thinkers have not been sufficiently analysed. In this article our aim is to demonstrate the connection of modernity, this movement with the evolution of philosophy over the past several decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Transhumanism, Posthumanism, and the “Cyborg Identity”
    Yayınlayan: Ankara Üniversitesi KASAUM Adres: Kadın Sorunları Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi, Cebeci 06590 Ankara Fe Dergi: Feminist Eleştiri 13, Sayı 1 Erişim bilgileri, makale sunumu ve ayrıntılar için: http://cins.ankara.edu.tr/ Transhumanism, Posthumanism, And The “Cyborg Identity” Cennet Ceren Çavuş Çevrimiçi yayına başlama tarihi: 10 Haziran 2021 Yazı Gönderim Tarihi: 18.01.2021 Yazı Kabul Tarihi: 12.05.2021 Bu makaleyi alıntılamak için: Cennet Ceren Çavuş, “Transhumanism, Posthumanism, And The “Cyborg Identity”” Fe Dergi 13, no. 1 (2021), 177-187. URL: http://cins.ankara.edu.tr/25_14.pdf Bu eser akademik faaliyetlerde ve referans verilerek kullanılabilir. Hiçbir şekilde izin alınmaksızın çoğaltılamaz. 177 Çavuş Transhumanism, Posthumanism, And The “Cyborg Identity” Cennet Ceren Çavuş* The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief analysis of two confusable philosophical positions, Transhumanism and Posthumanism, and compare their approaches in terms of their social and ecological concerns through an examination of Donna Haraway’s “cyborg identity.” Haraway introduces a ground-breaking approach in A Cyborg Manifesto and her later works, which blurs the formerly defined, distinct categories and identities that underlie the oppression of animals, humans, men, women, machines etc. By using postmodernist deconstruction, she wants to challenge Western dualisms and all kinds of oppression it causes. While Transhumanists, who inherit anthropocentrism from Humanism, support technological advancement to enhance the human condition, Posthumanists draw attention to the harms of the anthropocentric approach in terms of social and ecological justice and offer a more comprehensive and compassionate approach to other species inhabiting the planet. Since both Transhumanists and Posthumanists promote enhancement, Transhumanists need Posthumanist insights to really enhance the human condition concerning her environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Postmodernism—Science—Philosophy Marek Kwiek
    Postmodernism—Science—Philosophy Marek Kwiek The fundamental questions to be Zasadniczym pytaniem, jakie stawia Marek Kwiek — wykładowca addressed are these: What is the filozofii na Uniwersytecie Adama Mickiewicza — jest to, „w jaki impact of "postmodernism" on the sposób prąd umysłowy zwany postmodernizmem wpływa na wzajemne relacje pomi dzy filozofi a nauk ?" Zdaniem Kwieka, pojawieniu relationship between philosophy ę ą ą się filozofii postmodernistycznej towarzyszyła radykalna transforma- and science? What are the possible cja wzajemnych stosunków filozofii i nauk przyrodniczych. W prze- consequences of the postmodernist szłości, począwszy od starożytności, przez średniowiecze, aż do XIX whirlwind on the status of philos- wieku, więzi filozofii z nauką były silne. Były to więzi, które w isto- ophy in contemporary culture? cie uzależniały filozofię od „nauk pozytywnych". Możliwość ich wza- And, does postmodernism add new jemnej opozycji pojawiła się dopiero w ubiegłym stuleciu głównie za spraw niemieckich idealistów, w których przekonaniu filozofia questions to the gnawing issue over ą powinna wykraczać zarówno poza naukę, jak poza religię, i stawiać the degree, if any, to which a phi- sobie za cel poznanie całościowej i ostatecznej natury rzeczywistości. losopher is a scientist? It would Romantycy pierwsi przedłożyli filozofię ponad naukę sprowadzając seem that the relationship between „szkiełko i oko" do podrzędnej roli w poznaniu natury egzystencji. Z science and postmodern philoso- drugiej strony zapoczątkowana przez Comte'a tradycja pozytywistycz- na aspirowa a do osi gni cia ca kowicie przeciwnego celu — wykaza- phy is a radically new one, not only ł ą ę ł nia poznawczej nieprzydatno ci filozofii jako domeny metafizyki. W because the place of philosophy in ś rezultacie, sama filozofia utraciła swą jedność: rozpadła się na dwa culture is changing, but because nurty — jeden grawitujący ku poznawczemu modelowi nauki, drugi ku the place of science in culture is literaturze.
    [Show full text]
  • Perfection, Postmodern Culture, and the Biotechnology Debate Michael J
    DISTINGUISHED LECTURE PERFECTION, POSTMODERN CULTURE, AND THE BIOTECHNOEOGY DEBATE MICHAEL J. HYDE i N A T I O N A L COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION Carroll C. Arnold ^Distinguished Lecture n October 8,1994, the Administrative Committee of the National Communication Association established the Carroll C. Arnold Distinguished Lecture. The Arnold lecture is given in ple­ nary session at the annual convention of the Association and features the most accomplished researchers in the field. The topic of the lecture changes annually so as to capture the wide range0 of research being conducted in the field and to demonstrate the relevance of that work to society at large. The purpose of the Arnold Lecture is to inspire not by words but by intellectual deeds. Its goal is to make the members of the Association better informed by having one of its best professionals think aloud in their presence. Over the years, the Arnold Lecture will serve as a scholarly stimulus for new ideas and new ways of approaching those ideas. The inaugural Lecture was given on November 17,1995. The Arnold Lecturer is chosen each year by the First Vice President. When choosing the Arnold Lecturer, the First Vice President is charged to select a long-standing member of NCA, a scholar of undisputed merit who has already been recognized as such, a person whose recent research is as vital and suggestive as his or her earlier work, and a researcher whose work meets or exceeds the scholarly standards of the academy generally. The Lecture has been named for Carroll C. Arnold, Professor Emeritus of Pennsylvania State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Structuralism Dialogue Between Postmodernism and the Catholic Tradi- and the So-Called Russian Formalists
    Post-Structuralism dialogue between postmodernism and the Catholic tradi- and the so-called Russian formalists. Among the most tion is ongoing and has already borne copious fruit. important representatives of post-structuralist philosophy are Jacques Derrida (1930–2004), Gilles Deleuze (1925– SEE ALSO DECONSTRUCTIONISM;DIFFERENCE;LOGOCENTRISM;RE- 1995), Jean-François Lyotard (1924–1998), Jacques ALISM;RELATIVISM. Lacan (1901–1981), Michel Foucault (1926–1984), and Slavoj Žižek and his school. Though many of the BIBLIOGRAPHY representatives have French backgrounds, their theories De Schrijver, Georges. “Postmodernity and the Withdrawal of have had influence all over the world, especially in the the Divine: A Challenge for Theology.” In Sacramental Pres- areas of philosophy of language, ETHICS, NEOPRAGMA- ence in a Postmodern Context, edited by Lieven Boeve and TISM, literary theory, and gender studies. In the United Lambert Leijssen, 39–64. Louvain, Belgium: Leuven University Press, 2001. States, the works of Richard Rorty (1931–2007) and Judith Butler are often associated with post-structuralism. John Paul II. Fides et ratio. [Encyclical Letter on the Relation- ship between Faith and Reason]. September 14, 1998. http:// What distinguishes structuralism from post-structuralism www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/docu is not always easy to identify, but as a general rule post- ments/hf_jp-ii_enc_15101998_fides-et-ratio_en.html. structuralists see their theories as based on structuralism’s Lyotard, Jean-François. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on philosophy of language (Saussure) and anthropology Knowledge. Translated by Geoff Bennington and Brian Mas- (Lévi-Strauss), but they apply those insights to a wider sumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.
    [Show full text]
  • From Language to Postmodern Language Game Theory
    ISSN 2039-2117 (online) Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol 7 No 6 ISSN 2039-9340 (print) MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy November 2016 From Language to Postmodern Language Game Theory Prof., Dr. Le Huy Bac Hanoi National University of Education, Vietnam; Email: [email protected] Dr. Dao Thi Thu Hang Hanoi National University of Education, Vietnam; Email: [email protected] Doi:10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n6p319 Abstract This study explores the role of language in the postmodern times. We begin by looking at how the postmodernists think about language. They see language as being very important in society and they study language as metalanguage. They believe that language came into being is the same way that society came into being. Everything is governed by language and the way it works. Postmodernists believe that a language has its own life and attains meaning in the way that it is used in real life. In postmodern times game theory has taken on importance. It helps people understanding each other and how to live better. Ludwig Wittgenstein coined the term “language game”. He said that upon this foundation people’s actions are determined. Based on Wittgenstein’s observations, Jacques Derrida, Jean-François Lyotard and many postmodernists have developed the term. Language game has now penetrated deeply into literary theories and many aspects of life. Keywords: Postmodernism; language games; games; Wittgenstein; theory of games 1. Introduction Language is a means of communication. It is created by human beings in history. Language can reflect many things from society to nature. In use, it more and more becomes a hedge to prevent people from creating.
    [Show full text]
  • Reason, Rhythm, and Rituality. Reinterpreting Religious Cult from a Postmodern, Phenomenological Perspective
    Religions 2015, 6, 819–838; doi:10.3390/rel6030819 OPEN ACCESS religions ISSN 2077-1444 www.mdpi.com/journal/religions Article Reason, Rhythm, and Rituality. Reinterpreting Religious Cult from a Postmodern, Phenomenological Perspective Martina Roesner Katholisch-Theologische Fakultät, Institut für Bibelwissenschaft (Altes Testament), University of Vienna, Schenkenstraße 8-10, A-1010 Wien, Austria; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +43-1-4277-30418; eFax: +43-1-4277-830418 Academic Editor: Jonathan Hill Received: 4 May 2015 / Accepted: 17 June 2015 / Published: 10 July 2015 Abstract: Contemporary philosophy of religion is often focused, at a theoretical level, on the epistemic value of religious doctrines, and at a practical level, on the possible impact of organized religion on secular society and politics. However, the cultic dimension of religion, such as prayer, religious service, ascetic practices, and other rituals, is considered as completely “irrational” and incomprehensible from a secular perspective and therefore often neglected by postmodern philosophy. The paper intends to call into question this rather simplistic interpretation by retracing the historical origins of the devaluation of religious symbolism in occidental thought, which culminates in Kant’s philosophy of religion. We then shall analyze to what extent certain paradoxical aspects of Habermas’ view on religion can be interpreted as consequences of the dilemma brought about by the Kantian dichotomy between man as moral subject and man as natural, sensible being. In a third step, we shall develop an alternative, phenomenological interpretation, which does not consider religious practice as a primitive, irrational phenomenon but as a proto-ethical schematism that aims at integrating the sphere of pure practical reason into the rhythmic structure of living, embodied consciousness.
    [Show full text]