Samsung Nexus Manual Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Plugable USB 2.0 OTG Micro-B to 10/100 Fast Ethernet Adapter (ASIX AX88772A Chipset) Compatiblity List
Plugable USB 2.0 OTG Micro-B to 10/100 Fast Ethernet Adapter (ASIX AX88772A chipset) Compatiblity List Maker Model reported/tested Driver Notes version Support Android Tablet/Phone Alldaymall EU-A10T 5.1 Yes Reported by customer Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8.9 No Amazon Kindle Fire 7, 7th Gen Yes reported by customer Am Pumpkin Radium 2 No Reported by customer ASUS Memo Pad 8 AST21 Yes Reported by customer ASUS Memo Pad 7 572CL 4.4.2 Yes Reported by customer ASUS Memo Pad 7 LTE 5.1.1 Yes Reported by customer ASUS MeMO Pad 7 ME176C2 4.4.2 No Reported by customer ASUS MeMO Pad HD 7 ME173X 4.4.1 No Reported by customer ASUS 7" K013 4.4.2 No Reported by customer ASUS 10.1" K010 4.4 Yes Reported by customer ASUS ZenPad 10 (Z300C/P023) 5.0.2 Yes Reported by customer ASUS ZenPad 8.0 Yes Reported by customer ASUS ZenPad 7.0(Z370KL) 6.0.1 Yes Reported by customer ASUS ZenFone 2 551ML No * Reported by customer, only for browsing worked ΛzICHI ADP-722A 4.4.2 Yes Reported by customer BQ Aquaris U 7.1.1 Yes Reported by customer BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 7.0 Yes Reported by customer BQ Aquaris X Pro 7.1.1 Yes Reported by customer Covia Fleas Pop 5.1 No Reported by customer Cubot Cubot H1 5.1 No Reported by customer Datawind 3G7 4.2.2 Yes Reported by customer Digital2 D2-912_BK 9-Inch Tablet Yes Reported by customer Fujitsu ARROWS Tab F-02F 4.4.2 No Reported by customer Google Chromecast Yes Reported by customer, by using OTG Y cable Google Nexus Player 5.x Yes Reported by customer Google Nexus Player 6.0.1 Yes Please apply the latest Android updates *** Google -
AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT § LLC, § Case No
Case 2:19-cv-00361-JRG Document 1 Filed 11/04/19 Page 1 of 70 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION § AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT § LLC, § Case No. § Plaintiff, § JURY TRIAL DEMANDED § v. § § GOOGLE LLC, § § Defendant. § § PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff, AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS Software” or “Plaintiff”) files this original Complaint against Defendant Google LLC (“Defendant” or “Google”) for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271 and alleges as follows: THE PARTIES 1. Plaintiff AGIS Software is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Texas, and maintains its principal place of business at 100 W. Houston Street, Marshall, Texas 75670. AGIS Software is the owner of all right, title, and interest in and to U.S. Patent Nos. 8,213,970, 9,408,055, 9,445,251, 9,467,838, 9,749,829, and 9,820,123 (the “Patents-in-Suit”). 2. Defendant Google is a Delaware corporation and maintains its principal place of business at 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, California 94043, and may be served with process via its registered agent, Corporation Service Company at 251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington, DE 19808. Upon information and belief, Google does business in Texas, directly or through intermediaries, and offers its products and/or services, including those accused herein Case 2:19-cv-00361-JRG Document 1 Filed 11/04/19 Page 2 of 70 PageID #: 2 of infringement, to customers and potential customers located in Texas, including in the judicial Eastern District of Texas. -
Appendix Contents
Appendix This appendix contains the textual transcripts of the fifty smartphone advertisements selected for the analysis. The smartphones are arranged in an alphabetical order and numbered in concord with the numbering of the advertisements used in the thesis. Contents Appendix .................................................................................................................................... 1 1 Acer Liquid Z220 commercial ......................................................................................... 4 2 Acer Liquid Z520 commercial ......................................................................................... 4 3 Alcatel Onetouch Idol 2 S commercial ............................................................................ 5 4 ALCATEL ONETOUCH PIXI 3 Family commercial ................................................... 6 5 ARCHOS Helium Plus commercial ................................................................................. 8 6 ASUS ZenFone 2 and ZenFone Zoom commercial ........................................................ 9 7 ASUS ZenFone Max commercial ................................................................................... 10 8 BlackBerry Classic commercial ..................................................................................... 12 9 BlackBerry PRIV commercial ....................................................................................... 13 10 BLU Life Pure Mini commercial ................................................................................ -
Inside Android's Safetynet Attestation: Attack and Defense ●
Inside Android’s SafetyNet Attestation Collin Mulliner & John Kozyrakis About Dr.-Ing. Collin Mulliner John Kozyrakis [email protected] [email protected] @collinrm @ikoz Independent Security Researcher Applied Research Lead, Mobile, Synopsys SIG R&D Mobile Security since 1999 6y+ Security Consultant @ Cigital Worked on: J2ME, PalmOS, Symbian, Windows Mobile app protection design & testing for several Mobile, iOS and Android Security. Co-authored large US & UK orgs ‘The Android Hacker’s Handbook’, built an Mobile static & dynamic analysis tools Android-based device. ● Mobile App Security ● SafetyNet & Attestation Agenda ● Developer's Perspective ● Bypassing SafetyNet ● Conclusions & Future Rooting & root detection Mobile App Security ● App is the gateway to the service ○ More so if mobile first or mobile only (and no public APIs) ● Data displayed & managed by app ○ User is allowed to see content in the app but isn’t allowed to copy it Mobile App Security protects: Service, Revenue, Brand, User / Customer Rooting ● Why attack a mobile app? ○ Analyse internals, use enrolled identity, disable security controls, use low-level APIs etc ● Having the ability to escalate the privileges of a process to “root” ○ Regain full control over device ○ Just one step towards attacking apps ● Access any resource ○ Take screenshot, debug any app, instrument process ● Read / Write any file ○ Read private app data ● Modify OS and software framework ○ API returns different result Highly dependent on Android version due to SELinux (longer discussion…) Attack patterns -
BYD Mobile Device Chart
BYD Mobile Device Chart Channelview ISD Bring Your Device (BYD) The chart below describes many mobile devices, their features, and how they can be useful for teaching and learning. While it would be impossible to describe ALL devices, this chart selects some of the more popular and affordable mobile devices and describes their potential uses in the classroom. Please Note: • Participation in the Bring Your Device (BYD) program is OPTIONAL. o Parents/Guardians are NOT asked to purchase a mobile device or send a mobile device to school with their child. o Students are NOT REQUIRED to bring a mobile device to school. o If students bring a mobile device to school, they are expected to know how to operate the device on their own. • Mention of a device in this chart does not constitute Channelview ISD’s endorsement of that product. This chart is offered for informational and/or reference purposes only. All data in the chart is subject to change. 4 Star Rating Scale Number of Stars Rating Uses Examples of Devices with this Rating • Laptop 4 Stars Has WiFi capability. Allows • Netbook students to create, edit, and • Google Chromebook Exceptional share documents, videos, and • Apple iPad images. Ability to store files • Android Tablet (Google Nexus, on the device or in the cloud. Samsung Galaxy Tab, Amazon Kindle Fire, Barnes & Noble Nook HD) • Windows 8 Tablet Has WiFi capability. Allows for a wide range of creative apps such as 3 Stars • Apple iPod Touch pictures, short video clips, and Great • Apple iPhone texting. Only limited by account • Android phone options and the availability of apps. -
History and Evolution of the Android OS
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Springer - Publisher Connector CHAPTER 1 History and Evolution of the Android OS I’m going to destroy Android, because it’s a stolen product. I’m willing to go thermonuclear war on this. —Steve Jobs, Apple Inc. Android, Inc. started with a clear mission by its creators. According to Andy Rubin, one of Android’s founders, Android Inc. was to develop “smarter mobile devices that are more aware of its owner’s location and preferences.” Rubin further stated, “If people are smart, that information starts getting aggregated into consumer products.” The year was 2003 and the location was Palo Alto, California. This was the year Android was born. While Android, Inc. started operations secretly, today the entire world knows about Android. It is no secret that Android is an operating system (OS) for modern day smartphones, tablets, and soon-to-be laptops, but what exactly does that mean? What did Android used to look like? How has it gotten where it is today? All of these questions and more will be answered in this brief chapter. Origins Android first appeared on the technology radar in 2005 when Google, the multibillion- dollar technology company, purchased Android, Inc. At the time, not much was known about Android and what Google intended on doing with it. Information was sparse until 2007, when Google announced the world’s first truly open platform for mobile devices. The First Distribution of Android On November 5, 2007, a press release from the Open Handset Alliance set the stage for the future of the Android platform. -
Ibeta-Device-Invento
Android - Tablets Device Carrier Current Version Network 2012 Asus Google Nexus 7 (A) None 4.2.2 WiFi 2012 Asus Google Nexus 7 (B) None 4.4.2 WiFi 2013 Asus Google Nexus 7 (A) None 5.0.2 WiFi 2013 Asus Google Nexus 7 (B) None 5.0.2 WiFi Asus Eee Pad Transformer None 4.0.3 WiFi Asus ZenPad 8.0 inch None 6 WiFi Acer Iconia Tab - A500 None 4.0.3 WiFi Acer Iconia One 10 inch None 5.1 WiFi Archos 10 None 2.2.6 WiFi Archos 7 None 2.1 WiFi B&N Nook Color None Nook 1.4.3 (Android Base) WiFi Creative Ziio None 2.2.1 WiFi Digiland DL 701Q None 4.4.2 WiFi Dell Streak 7 T-Mobile 2.2 3G/WiFi HTC Google Nexus 9 (A) None 7.1.1 WiFi HTC Google Nexus 9 (B) None 7.1.1 WiFi LG G Pad (A) None 4.4.2 WiFi LG G Pad (B) None 5.0.2 WiFi LG G PAD F 8inch None 5.0.2 WiFi Motorola Xoom Verizon 4.1.2 3G/WiFi NVIDIA Shield K1 None 7 WiFi Polaroid 7" Tablet (PMID701i) None 4.0.3 WiFi Samsung Galaxy Tab Verizon 2.3.5 3G/WiFi Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 None 4.4.2 WiFi Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 None 5.1.1 WiFi Samsung Galaxy Tab A None 8.1.0 WiFi Samsung Galaxy Tab E 9.6 None 6.0.1 WiFi Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 None 8.0.0 WiFi Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 None 9 WiFi Samsung Google Nexus 10 None 5.1.1 WiFi Samsung Tab pro 12 inch None 5.1.1 WiFi ViewSonic G-Tablet None 2.2 WiFi ViewSonic ViewPad 7 T-Mobile 2.2.1 3G/WiFi Android - Phones Essential Phone Verizon 9 3G/LTE/WiFi Google Pixel (A) Verizon 9 3G/LTE/WiFi Android - Phones (continued) Google Pixel (B) Verizon 8.1 3G/LTE/WiFi Google Pixel (C) Factory Unlocked 9 3G/LTE/WiFi Google Pixel 2 Verizon 8.1 3G/LTE/WiFi Google Pixel -
Totalmem),Form Factor,System on Chip,Screen Sizes,Screen Densities,Abis,Android SDK Versions,Opengl ES Versions
Manufacturer,Model Name,Model Code,RAM (TotalMem),Form Factor,System on Chip,Screen Sizes,Screen Densities,ABIs,Android SDK Versions,OpenGL ES Versions 10.or,E,E,2846MB,Phone,Qualcomm MSM8937,1080x1920,480,arm64-v8a 10.or,G,G,3603MB,Phone,Qualcomm MSM8953,1080x1920,480,arm64-v8a 10.or,D,10or_D,2874MB,Phone,Qualcomm MSM8917,720x1280,320,arm64-v8a 4good,A103,4GOOD_Light_A103,907MB,Phone,Mediatek MT6737M,540x960,240,armeabi- v7a 4good,4GOOD Light B100,4GOOD_Light_B100,907MB,Phone,Mediatek MT6737M,540x960,240,armeabi-v7a 7Eleven,IN265,IN265,466MB,Phone,Mediatek MT6572,540x960,240,armeabi-v7a 7mobile,DRENA,DRENA,925MB,Phone,Spreadtrum SC7731C,480x800,240,armeabi-v7a 7mobile,KAMBA,KAMBA,1957MB,Phone,Mediatek MT6580,720x1280,320,armeabi-v7a 7mobile,SWEGUE,SWEGUE,1836MB,Phone,Mediatek MT6737T,1080x1920,480,arm64-v8a A.O.I. ELECTRONICS FACTORY,A.O.I.,TR10CS1_11,965MB,Tablet,Intel Z2520,1280x800,160,x86 Aamra WE,E2,E2,964MB,Phone,Mediatek MT6580,480x854,240,armeabi-v7a Accent,Pearl_A4,Pearl_A4,955MB,Phone,Mediatek MT6580,720x1440,320,armeabi-v7a Accent,FAST7 3G,FAST7_3G,954MB,Tablet,Mediatek MT8321,720x1280,160,armeabi-v7a Accent,Pearl A4 PLUS,PEARL_A4_PLUS,1929MB,Phone,Mediatek MT6737,720x1440,320,armeabi-v7a Accent,SPEED S8,SPEED_S8,894MB,Phone,Mediatek MT6580,720x1280,320,armeabi-v7a Acegame S.A. -
Sprint Complete
Sprint Complete Equipment Replacement Insurance Program (ERP) Equipment Service and Repair Service Contract Program (ESRP) Effective July 2021 This device schedule is updated regularly to include new models. Check this document any time your equipment changes and before visiting an authorized repair center for service. If you are not certain of the model of your phone, refer to your original receipt or it may be printed on the white label located under the battery of your device. Repair eligibility is subject to change. Models Eligible for $29 Cracked Screen Repair* Apple Samsung HTC LG • iPhone 5 • iPhone X • GS5 • Note 8 • One M8 • G Flex • G3 Vigor • iPhone 5C • iPhone XS • GS6 • Note 9 • One E8 • G Flex II • G4 • iPhone 5S • iPhone XS Max • GS6 Edge • Note 20 5G • One M9 • G Stylo • G5 • iPhone 6 • iPhone XR • GS6 Edge+ • Note 20 Ultra 5G • One M10 • Stylo 2 • G6 • iPhone 6 Plus • iPhone 11 • GS7 • GS10 • Bolt • Stylo 3 • V20 • iPhone 6S • iPhone 11 Pro • GS7 Edge • GS10e • HTC U11 • Stylo 6 • X power • iPhone 6S Plus • iPhone 11 Pro • GS8 • GS10+ • G7 ThinQ • V40 ThinQ • iPhone SE Max • GS8+ • GS10 5G • G8 ThinQ • V50 ThinQ • iPhone SE2 • iPhone 12 • GS9 • Note 10 • G8X ThinQ • V60 ThinQ 5G • iPhone 7 • iPhone 12 Pro • GS9+ • Note 10+ • V60 ThinQ 5G • iPhone 7 Plus • iPhone 12 Pro • A50 • GS20 5G Dual Screen • iPhone 8 Max • A51 • GS20+ 5G • Velvet 5G • iPhone 8 Plus • iPhone 12 Mini • Note 4 • GS20 Ultra 5G • Note 5 • Galaxy S20 FE 5G • GS21 5G • GS21+ 5G • GS21 Ultra 5G Monthly Charge, Deductible/Service Fee, and Repair Schedule -
Inferring Phone Location State
Inferring Phone Location State Steven Chen Won Park Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of California, Berkeley University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, United States Berkeley, United States [email protected] [email protected] Joanna Yang David Wagner Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of California, Berkeley University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, United States Berkeley, United States [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—Smartphone sensors are becoming more universal a single phone model. We then extend this to a different phone and more accurate. In this paper, we aim to distinguish between model and show that it could be possible to evaluate states four common positions or states a phone can be in: in the hand, on a different phone, even if the phone has an accelerometer pocket, backpack, or on a table. Using a uniquely designed neural network and data from the accelerometer and the screen state, sensor that is calibrated differently. To do this, we found that we achieve a 92% accuracy on the same phone. We also explore the acceleration values between the two phones can be adjusted extending this to different phones and propose an acceleration with a simple offset. In two cross phone studies we achieve calibration technique to do so. accuracies of 78% and 91%. Unfortunately, we were unable to Index Terms—Sensors, Smartphone, Position investigate the root cause of this discrepancy further. While the work on this is preliminary, we believe it provides an important I.I NTRODUCTION step toward the goal of a universal classifier that can detect With the recent proliferation of smartphones with sensors, different phone states across phone models. -
Google Nexus 6P (H1512) Google Nexus 7
GPSMAP 276Cx Google Google Nexus 5X (H791) Google Nexus 6P (H1512) Google Nexus 7 Google Nexus 6 HTC HTC One (M7) HTC One (M9) HTC One (M10) HTC One (M8) HTC One (A9) HTC Butterfly S LG LG V10 H962 LG G3 Titan LG G5 H860 LG E988 Gpro LG G4 H815 Motorola Motorola RAZR M Motorola DROID Turbo Motorola Moto G (2st Gen) Motorola Droid MAXX Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) Samsung Samsung Galaxy Note 2 Samsung Galaxy S4 Active Samsung Galaxy S6 edge + (SM-G9287) Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Samsung Galaxy S5 Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (SM- G935FD) Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Samsung Galaxy S5 Active Samsung GALAXY J Samsung Galaxy Note 5 (SM- Samsung Galaxy S5 Mini Samsung Galaxy A5 Duos N9208) Samsung Galaxy S3 Samsung Galaxy S6 Samsung Galaxy A9 (SM- A9000) Samsung Galaxy S4 Sony Sony Ericsson Xperia Z Sony Xperia Z3 Sony Xperia X Sony Ericsson Xperia Z Ultra Sony Xperia Z3 Compact Sony XPERIA Z5 Sony Xperia Z2 Sony XPERIA E1 Asus ASUS Zenfone 2 ASUS Zenfone 5 ASUS Zenfone 6 Huawei HUAWEI P8 HUAWEI M100 HUAWEI P9 HUAWEI CRR_L09 XIAOMI XIAOMI 2S XIAOMI 3 XIAOMI 5 XIAOMI Note GPSMAP 64s Google Google Nexus 4 Google Nexus 6P (H1512) Google Pixel Google Nexus 6 Google Nexus 7 HTC HTC One (M7) HTC One (A9) HTC Butterfly S HTC One (M8) HTC One (M10) HTC U11 HTC One (M9) LG LG Flex LG E988 Gpro LG G5 H860 LG V10 H962 LG G4 H815 LG G6 H870 Motorola Motorola RAZR M Motorola DROID Turbo Motorola Moto G (2st Gen) Motorola Droid MAXX Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) Motorola Moto Z Samsung Samsung Galaxy Note 2 Samsung Galaxy S5 Samsung Galaxy J5 Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Samsung Galaxy -
Barometer of Mobile Internet Connections in Switzerland
Barometer of mobile internet connections in Switzerland Publication of March 06th 2020 2019 report nPerf is a trademark owned by nPerf SAS, 87 rue de Sèze 69006 LYON – France. Contents 1 Summary of overall results .......................................................................................................... 2 1.1 nPerf score, all technologies combined, [2G->4G] ............................................................... 2 1.2 Our analysis ........................................................................................................................... 3 2 Overall results ............................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Data amount and distribution ............................................................................................... 3 2.2 Success rate [2G->4G] ........................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Download speed [2G->4G] ..................................................................................................... 4 2.4 Upload speed [2G->4G] ......................................................................................................... 4 2.5 Latency [2G->4G] ................................................................................................................... 5 2.6 Browsing test [2G->4G] ......................................................................................................... 5 2.7 Streaming test [2G->4G]