10 Years After the Great East Japan Earthquake Iwate

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

10 Years After the Great East Japan Earthquake Iwate 10 years after the Great East Japan Earthquake Iwate 200 Miyagi 100 Minister for Reconstruction Fukushima 0 Fukushima Daiichi(km) HIRASAWA Katsuei Nuclear Power Plant 22 February 2021 Kyoto Tokyo Great East Japan Earthquake (1) Scale (2) Damage (as of March 2020) - No. of human casualties: - Date: March 11, 2011 at 14:46 JST • Deceased 19,729 - Epicenter: 130 km off the Pacific Coast of • Missing 2,559 Tohoku Region - No. of damaged buildings: - Scale: Magnitude 9.0 • Completely destroyed 121,996 (The largest earthquake ever recorded in Japan) • Half destroyed 282,941 • Partially destroyed 748,461 Seismic intensity distribution (Seismic intensity from 4 to 7) Approx. 800km Tohoku Iwate Region Prefecture Miyagi Prefecture Fukushima Prefecture 2 Support from the World Int’l rescue teams operated in the devastated areas 163 countries and areas as well as 43 international organizations expressed their intention of assistance 24 countries and areas plus five international organizations dispatched rescue teams We have received relief supplies and donations from 128 countries, areas and organizations (Source: https://www.mofa.go.jp/j_info/visit/incidents/index.html ) 3 Ten years later: Tohoku Today and in the Future: https://www.reconstruction.go.jp/10year/en/index.html 4 Public housing for disaster-affected 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% Progress rate 50% of completion 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% End of End of End of End of End of End of End of End of End of FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 8 prefectures in disaster-affected areas Iwate Prefecture Miyagi Prefecture Fukushima Prefecture Otsuchi Town, Iwate Prefecture Ishinomaki City, Miyagi Prefecture 5 Projected opening of Reconstruction Roads & Reconstruction Support Roads (as of September 2020) Miyako-Morioka Connecting Road Sanriku Coastal Road National Rte. 106 Miyako-Morioka Connecting National Rte. 45 Sanriku Coastal Road (from Road (from Miyako to Hakoishi) Samuraihama to Hashikami) 2020 From Hikime to Haratai district (Miyako City) 2020 From Samuraihama IC to Hashikami IC (7.0km) (23.0km) National Rte. 106 Miyako-Morioka Connecting Road (from Miyako to Hakoishi) ( National Rte. 45 Sanriku Coastal Road (from Fudai Aomori to Kuji) Tenmabayashi(2) 2020 From Kawai to Hakoishi district (Miyako City) Tsugarukashiwa Aomori Aomori- 2020 From Noda IC to Kuji IC (12.0km) (7.0km) Ajigasawa higashi Namioka Shichinohe National Rte. 106 Miyako-Morioka Connecting J Road (from Hiratsuto/Iwai to Matsukusa) Rokunohe J National Rte. 45 Sanriku Coastal Road (from Fudai ( ($ to Kuji) 2020 From Hiratsuto to Kuzakai (Miyako City) Aomori Pref. Hachinohe (7.0km) Hashikami 2021 From Fudai-mura No. 16 Chiwari to Noda IC Hachinohe J National Rte. 106 Miyako-Morioka Connecting (13.0km) Kosaka J Road (from Kuzakai to Yanagawa) ($ National Rte. 45 Sanriku Coastal Road (from 2020 From Kuzakai (Miyako City) to Yanagawa Samuraihama Okanyo to Fudai) ( (Morioka City) (8.0km) Kuji 2020 From Tanohata-kita IC to Fudai-mura No. 11 ( Chiwari (8.0km) Ashiro J Noda National Rte. 45 Sanriku Coastal Road (from Tanohata-kita Tanohata-minami to Okanyo) Akita Pref. Sanriku Coastal Road Reconstruction Road: 2020 From Tanohatamura-Oashi to Tanohatamura-Tanohata (6.0km) Reconstruction Support Road Taro-Masaki Miyako-Morioka Connecting Road Kaigan National Rte. 45 Sanriku Coastal Road (from Miyako-chuo Tohoku Crossing Expressway Morioka-minami Kesennuma to Karakuwa-minami) ( Miyako-Neichi 2020 From Kesennuma-ko IC to Karakuwa-minami Iwate Pref. ( (Kamaishi-Akita lane) ( IC (7.3km) Reconstruction Support Road FY2018 All lanes opened Hanamaki J Tohoku Crossing Expressway National Rte. 45 Sanriku Coastal Road (from Kamaishi-Akita lane ( Utatsu to Motoyoshi) Yokote J ( Kitakami J 2020 From Koizumikaigan IC to Motoyoshi-Tsuya Kamaishi J IC (2.0km) Ogachikomachi Reconstruction Support Road ( Nozoki Miyagi-Kenpoku Roadᴾᴾ Yamagata Pref. Karakuwa-minami Kaneyama-kita Kesennuma-ko Shinjo-kita Kurihara Tsukidate- Motoyoshi-Tsuya Soma-Fukushima Road higashi Koizumi Kaigan ( ( Sanuma Tome National Rte. 115 Soma-Fukushima Road (from Oishida-Murayama Ryozen to Fukushima) Miyagi Pref. Gassan ( Miyagi-Kenpoku Road 2020 From Ryozen IC to Date-chuo IC (7.4km) Higashine-kita ( ( Tomiya J National Rte. 115 Soma-Fukushima Road (from Yamagata J Rifu J Phase III (Sanuma section) Sendai- 2021 From Sanuma-kita crossing to Sanuma IC Ryozen to Fukushima) ( Sendaiko-kita minami (4km) 2020 From Date-chuo IC to Date-Kori IC (2.8km) Sendai Wakabayashi J ( Murata J ( ( Pacific Ocean Reconstrution Support Road Soma-Fukushima Road ( Kori J Date-kori Fukushima J Date-chuo Soma Ryozen Legend Scheduled to open in FY2020 ( ( ( Scheduled to open in FY2021 Koriyama J Opened ( Fukushima Pref. ( ■■■■■■■■■■■ Under construction Ono Yabuki ( Section of existing road in use ( ( Not in operation for construction Iwaki J ( * Interchange names also include tentative names. ○Reconstruction Roads and Reconstruction Support Roads All lanes are expected to open by FY2020 during the Reconstruction and Revitalization Period, excluding some sections in Iwate and Miyagi prefectures. ④ Status of recovery of the tourism industry Current status of inbound tourism in Tohoku Changes in the total number of foreign visitors on overnight stays (2010=100) 400 2019 Nationwide 389 2010 ・The total number of 350 Japan 6 prefectures 6 prefectures in in Tohoku overnight stays by foreign Tohoku 300 3 prefectures in 332 visitors in six prefectures in Tohoku 250 (Unit: 10,000 person-nights) 3 prefectures Tohoku reached 1.68 in Tohoku million in 2019, surpassing 200 315 150 the national government's target of 1.5 million 100 overnight stays by tourists 50 from overseas in the region 0 by 2020. 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 *Japan Tourism Agency: "Survey on Overnight Stays" *Covers accommodation facilities with 10 or more employees Inbound tourism Ex.: Dissemination of ●Subsidy for reconstruction of tourism in information using big data. Attracting foreign visitors to Tohoku (Japan Tourism Agency) Japan with a website that Support for community-led initiatives to recommends content and - tours of Tohoku to attract inbound tourists encourage tourism to the region. ● Promotion of reconstruction of tourism in Ex.: Creation of videos on Tohoku (Japan Tourism Agency) location at Mount Bandai and other places in -Concentrated promotion of visits to Japan Fukushima. Raise as part of destination campaigns targeting awareness of the area by featuring celebrities from major overseas markets, with a special overseas to disseminate focus on the Tohoku region information. Ex.: Send-off foreign ● “New Tohoku” Exchange Expansion Model tourists to Japan by Project (Reconstruction Agency) creating products that allow them to experience -Support for the launch of new private both the usual and sector business models to attract tourists unusual sides of Tohoku. from overseas Domestic tourism Encourage junior and high school students to talk ●Support for tourism-related reconstruction in directly to restaurant owners, Fukushima Prefecture (Japan Tourism Agency) hotel proprietors, doctors and others in disaster- -Support for activities by Fukushima affected areas. Give monitoring tours to learn Prefecture to promote domestic tourism about the past and present featuring content unique to Fukushima of Fukushima. これまでの実績 Major Tourist Attractions in 3 Disaster-stricken Prefectures ④ 観光業の復興状況について Izunuma-Uchinuma Iwate Prefecture 東北のインバウンドの現状 Miyagi Prefecture 外国人延べ宿泊者数の推移 (H22=100とする) Goshono Jomon Site 全国 389 ・東北6県の外国人延べ宿泊 400 者数は、令和元年(2019 Izunuma-Uchinuma is registered 東北6県 under the Ramsar Convention as a 350 年)に168万人泊となり、 stopover for migratory birds. The 332 lake is blanketed with lotus flowers 300 令和2年(2020年)までに in the summer, and swans and geese Pit houses and stone circles have been come here to spend the winter. (For (単位:万人泊) 東北3県 外国人延べ宿泊者数を reconstructed at an ancient, large- details: https://www.kurihara-kb.net/ 250 scale settlement from the latter part of publics/index/27/) 315 「150万人泊」とする政府 the middle Jomon period. (For details: 200 目標を上回った。 https://goshono-iseki.com/) Four Panoramic Views of Matsushima 150 Ryusendo Cave 100 50 0 H22 H23 H24 H25 H26 H27 H28 H29 H30 R1 Ryusendo Cave is one of the three largest The four panoramic views overlook ※観光庁:「宿泊旅行統計調査」 ※従業員10人以上の宿泊施設を対象。 limestone caves in Japan and has been the 260 some-odd islands in designated as a national natural Matsushima Bay. (For details: https:// monument, together with the species of www.matsushima-kanko.com/ bats that live in the cave. (For details: miryoku/shima/shidaikan.php) http://www.iwate-ryusendo.jp/) Funaokajoshi Park & the 主な取組 Jodogahama Shiroishi River and 1000 Cherry Trees インバウンド 例:ビッグデータを活用し た情報発信。訪日予定外国 ●東北観光復興対策交付金(観光庁) 人を東北のコンテンツやツ This is a well-known scenic spot in the アー等を提案するサイトへ This is the only cherry blossom spot in -地域の発案に基づくインバウンド誘客に向け center of the Sanriku Fukko National 誘引し、訪東北を促進。 Park. (For details: https:// Miyagi Prefecture selected as one of た取組を支援。 www.city.miyako.iwate.jp/kanko/ Japanʼs top 100 cherry blossom sites. jyoudogahama.html) (For details: https://www.skbk.or.jp/ spot/view/funaokajyoshi.html, https:// ●東北観光復興プロモーション(観光庁) www.oogawara.com/tourism/ 例:福島・磐梯山等がロケ Fukushima sakura/) 地の映像を制作。 -東北に特化した海外主要市場向けのデスティ Prefecture Goshikinuma Ponds 海外の著名人を活用した情 ネーション・キャンペーンとして、集中的な (Five Colored Lakes) 報発信による認知度の向 訪日プロモーションを実施。 上。 Tsurugajo Catsle ●「新しい東北」交流拡大モデル事業(復興庁) 例:東北のハレとケを体験 -外国人旅行者の誘客につながる民間の新たな This is a collective term for numerous できる商品の造成を通じ lakes and ponds,
Recommended publications
  • A Symposium DECEMBER 7–8, 2018
    A Symposium DECEMBER 7–8, 2018 The 2018 Mildred Schnitzer Memorial Lecture in Asian Art THE MILDRED SCHNITZER MEMORIAL LECTURE SERIES The Mildred Schnitzer Asian Art Endowment Fund was established in 1995 to honor the founder of the Portland Art Museum’s Asian Art Council. Mildred Schnitzer (1920–1999) was one of this community’s most passionate advocates for a greater understanding of Asian art and culture. The fund allows the Museum to bring distinguished speakers from around the world to Portland to share their knowledge and insights. The fund was created and has been sustained by contributions from Schnitzer’s daughters and friends, as well as members of the Asian Art Council. Contributions to the fund are welcome. SPONSORS The Mildred Schnitzer Asian Art Endowment Fund Bonhams The Donald Jenkins Visiting Scholar Fund The Metropolitan Center for Far Eastern Art Studies SYMPOSIUM REGISTRATION: Those who have not registered in advance online will be able to register for the symposium at any time at either of the two Museum entrances. Symposium badges can be picked up any time from Thursday, December 6, onwards. EXHIBITION VIEWING HOURS: Poetic Imagination in Japanese Art will be accessible during all hours that the Museum is open to the public: Thursday: 10 a.m.–8 p.m. Friday: 10 a.m.–8 p.m. Saturday: 10 a.m.–5 p.m.* *Extended hours until 7 p.m. for symposium attendees only FRIDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2018 6 p.m. Keynote Lecture: Retired Emperor Goyōzei’s Waka Album and “The Poetry Contest between Different Eras” Dr. Joshua Mostow, University of British Columbia SATURDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2018 8:30 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Greetingsfrom Koriyama City
    ‘Nunobiki Plateau Wind Farm’: boasting 33 wind turbines with the height of roughly 100 meters, one of the largest scale wind farms in Japan Greetings from Koriyama City -Toward a future-oriented and mutually-beneficial relationship between the cities of Essen and Koriyama- Business Creation Division City of Koriyama, JAPAN City of Koriyama, Fukushima Prefecture JAPAN 1 Geographical Features of Koriyama City -Two Cities of Essen and Koriyama- 2nd most populous in Fukushima Prefecture and 3rd most populous in Tohoku Region ‘Economic Capital City in Fukushima Prefecture’, boasting its Essen City biggest retail sales and largest number of retail businesses in the prefecture Largest number of agricultural households in Fukushima State of North Rhine- Prefecture, boasting biggest rice production in the prefecture Westphalia 51 Degrees 37 Degrees Koriyama City Fukushima Prefecture Koriyama City Central urban area of Koriyama City (the west exit of Koriyama Station) City of Koriyama, Fukushima Prefecture JAPAN 2 History of the Development of Koriyama City -Transition from a city of power generation to city of renewable energy and medical devices- 5.Great East Japan 6.Restoration Earthquake and Nuclear Accident from the disasters, at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear promoting renewable Power Station in 2011 energy and medical device development Oyasuba Burial Mound, built in the Fukushima Renewable Energy early Kofun Period (250 AD-538 AD) Institute, AIST (FREA) opened in April 2014 Building with its first floor collapsed due to the fierce earthquake 4.People gathered, schools and banks established, Fukushima Medical Device Development Numagami Hydroelectric Power Station, laid Support Center (FMDDSC) the foundation of Koriyama’s development railroaded to become the center of Fukushima Prefecture opened in November 2016 3.New industry revolution, cotton and chemical industries flourished by hydro electric power generation, Hodogaya Chemical Co., LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • FONTI E DOCUMENTI STORICAMENTE.ORG Laboratorio Di Storia
    St�rica L A B O R A T O R I O D I S T O R I A ALMA MATER STUDIORUM Università di Bologna Dipartimento di Storia Culture Civiltà FONTI E DOCUMENTI STORICAMENTE.ORG Laboratorio di Storia Florian Coulmas 3.11 From one Disaster to another: Japan’s Earthquake Numero 17 - 2021 ISSN: 1825-411X Art. 1 pp. 1-18 DOI: 10.12977/stor819 Editore: BraDypUS Data di pubblicazione: 05/03/2021 Sezione: Fonti e documenti 3.11 From one Disaster to another: Japan’s Earthquake FLORIAN COULMAS Univ. of Duisburg-Essen. IN-EAST Institute for East Asian Studies This paper recounts the experience of the Great Eastern Japan Earthquake on 11th March 2011 and offers an assessment of reactions to it on personal, social and policy levels. Almost a decade after the event, it looks at traces of the disaster, discussing in particular the following questions. What were the consequences if any for Japan’s energy policy? What other conse- quences were there, for example, concerning crisis management? How did people integrate the earthquake into their view of history? How did the earthquake affect people’s life satisfaction? And how does it relate to current events? It argues that despite its for all concerned unpre- cedented severity the disaster led to gradual improvements, rather than fundamental change. Recollection: a personal view Is ten years ago “history”? To me it is the recent past. In a sense it’s the extended present; it is still with me. Just like the majority of the books of my library I then had, the Japanese porcelain cup of my morning coffee, even the car that I drive.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fukushima Nuclear Accident and Crisis Management
    e Fukushima Nuclearand Crisis Accident Management e Fukushima The Fukushima Nuclear Accident and Crisis Management — Lessons for Japan-U.S. Alliance Cooperation — — Lessons for Japan-U.S. Alliance Cooperation — — Lessons for Japan-U.S. September, 2012 e Sasakawa Peace Foundation Foreword This report is the culmination of a research project titled ”Assessment: Japan-US Response to the Fukushima Crisis,” which the Sasakawa Peace Foundation launched in July 2011. The accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant that resulted from the Great East Japan Earthquake of March 11, 2011, involved the dispersion and spread of radioactive materials, and thus from both the political and economic perspectives, the accident became not only an issue for Japan itself but also an issue requiring international crisis management. Because nuclear plants can become the target of nuclear terrorism, problems related to such facilities are directly connected to security issues. However, the policymaking of the Japanese government and Japan-US coordination in response to the Fukushima crisis was not implemented smoothly. This research project was premised upon the belief that it is extremely important for the future of the Japan-US relationship to draw lessons from the recent crisis and use that to deepen bilateral cooperation. The objective of this project was thus to review and analyze the lessons that can be drawn from US and Japanese responses to the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, and on the basis of these assessments, to contribute to enhancing the Japan-US alliance’s nuclear crisis management capabilities, including its ability to respond to nuclear terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • E Great East Japan Earthquake
    e Great East Japan Earthquake A story of a devastating natural disaster, a tale of human compassion 11 March 2011 The Great East Japan Earthquake A story of a devastating natural disaster, A tale of human compassion 11 March 2011 WHO Library Cataloguing in Publication Data The great east Japan earthquake: a story of devastating natural disaster, a tale of human compassion 1. Disasters. 2. Earthquakes. 3. Emergency medical services. 4. Japan. 5. Relief work. 6. Risk assessment. I. World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific. ISBN 978 92 9061 568 2 (NLM Classification: WA295) © World Health Organization 2012 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel: +41 22 791 2476; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce WHO publications, in part or in whole, or to translate them – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; e-mail: [email protected]). For WHO Western Pacific Regional Publications, request for permission to reproduce should be addressed to Publications Office, World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Western Pacific, P.O. Box 2932, 1000, Manila, Philippines, fax: +632 521 1036, e-mail: [email protected] The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Sludge Carbon As an Adsorbent for Fukushima Radiocontaminated Paddy Soil
    applied sciences Article Paper Sludge Carbon as an Adsorbent for Fukushima Radiocontaminated Paddy Soil Ai Van Tran 1,* and Makoto Yanaga 2 1 Corelex SanEi Co. Ltd., Agoyama 775-1, Shizuoka Prefecture, Fujinomiya City 418-0037, Japan 2 Center for Radioscience Education and Research, Faculty of Science, Shizuoka University, 836 Ohya, Suruga-ku, Shizuoka City 422-8529, Japan; [email protected]; Tel.: +81-54-238-4804 * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +81-544-23-0303 Received: 28 August 2020; Accepted: 15 September 2020; Published: 17 September 2020 Abstract: Radiocontaminated soil in a paddy field in the Iitate village in Fukushima was treated with an industrial paper sludge carbon (PSC) prior to growing rice in May 2011. The results showed that the sum of the activity concentrations of 134Cs and 137Cs in the polished rice harvested in October 2011 was 30 Bq kg 1, a level much lower than the Japanese governmental safeguard value of 100 Bq kg 1. · − · − Upon contacting with the contaminated soil, the contents of calcium, magnesium, copper, potassium, and barium in the PSC were decreased. Among the PSCs impregnated with various chlorides and sulfates of the previously mentioned minerals, potassium chloride, copper sulfate, magnesium sulfate, and potassium sulfate yielded higher decontamination degrees compared to the original PSC. The results imply that radioactive cesium in the soil exchanges cations with these minerals. Keywords: paper sludge carbon; decontamination; rice; ion exchange; 134Cs; 137Cs 1. Introduction As the radiocontaminated soil from the Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident in 1986 is concerned, Guillitte and co-workers [1] proposed countermeasures such as the removal of contaminated surface soil, spraying contaminated canopies with detergents or cleaning agents, defoliation and removal of fallen leaves, as well as plowing after clear felling and prior to planting.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2011 Earthquake, Tsunami and Fukushima Nuclear Accident Impacts on Japanese Agri-Food Sector
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive March 2011 earthquake, tsunami and Fukushima nuclear accident impacts on Japanese agri-food sector Bachev, Hrabrin January 2015 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/61499/ MPRA Paper No. 61499, posted 21 Jan 2015 14:37 UTC March 2011 earthquake, tsunami and Fukushima nuclear accident impacts on Japanese agri-food sector Hrabrin Bachev1 I. Introduction On March 11, 2011 the strongest recorded in Japan earthquake off the Pacific coast of North-east of the country occurred (also know as Great East Japan Earthquake, 2011 Tohoku earthquake, and the 3.11 Earthquake) which triggered a powerful tsunami and caused a nuclear accident in one of the world’s largest nuclear plant (Fukushima Daichi Nuclear Plant Station). It was the first disaster that included an earthquake, a tsunami, and a nuclear power plant accident. The 2011 disasters have had immense impacts on people life, health and property, social infrastructure and economy, natural and institutional environment, etc. in North-eastern Japan and beyond [Abe, 2014; Al-Badri and Berends, 2013; Biodiversity Center of Japan, 2013; Britannica, 2014; Buesseler, 2014; FNAIC, 2013; Fujita et al., 2012; IAEA, 2011; IBRD, 2012; Kontar et al., 2014; NIRA, 2013; TEPCO, 2012; UNEP, 2012; Vervaeck and Daniell, 2012; Umeda, 2013; WHO, 2013; WWF, 2013]. We have done an assessment of major social, economic and environmental impacts of the triple disaster in another publication [Bachev, 2014]. There have been numerous publications on diverse impacts of the 2011 disasters including on the Japanese agriculture and food sector [Bachev and Ito, 2013; JA-ZENCHU, 2011; Johnson, 2011; Hamada and Ogino, 2012; MAFF, 2012; Koyama, 2013; Sekizawa, 2013; Pushpalal et al., 2013; Liou et al., 2012; Murayama, 2012; MHLW, 2013; Nakanishi and Tanoi, 2013; Oka, 2012; Ujiie, 2012; Yasunaria et al., 2011; Watanabe A., 2011; Watanabe N., 2013].
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Years Since the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster
    10 YEARS SINCE THE FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR DISASTER By Philip White February 2021 Philip White was international liaison officer for the Tokyo-based Citizens' Nuclear Information Center at the time of the Fukushima nuclear accident. In 2014 he completed a PhD on public participation in Japan's nuclear energy policy-forming process. 1. Remembering the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster 2. How the disaster unfolded 3. What's the situation now? Evacuees ‒ Health issues ‒ Liability and compensation ‒ Decontamination of the environment and agriculture ‒ Radioactive water and fishing ‒ Decommissioning of nuclear power plants ‒ Cost 4. Post-Fukushima energy policy 5. Putting it in perspective References 1. Remembering the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster Ten years ago, three of the nuclear reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station suffered melt downs in the days following a Magnitude 9 earthquake that struck off the northeast coast of Japan on 11 March 2011. Along with the 1986 nuclear accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Station in the former Soviet Union, it was one of the two worst nuclear power accidents in history. On the tenth anniversary, it is important that we remember what happened then and what has happened since. It is in the interests of those who caused the accident that we forget. We must refuse to do so, for the sake of the victims and to prevent more disasters in future. The most important take-home message is that the disaster is far from over. In order to win the bid for the (now postponed) 2020 Olympics, then Prime Minister Abe asserted that the nuclear accident was 'under control'.
    [Show full text]
  • Agri-Food Impacts of Fukushima Nuclear Accident - Lessons Learned 10 Years After Disaster
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Agri-food impacts of Fukushima nuclear accident - lessons learned 10 years after disaster Bachev, Hrabrin Institute of Agricultural Economics, Sofia May 2021 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/108041/ MPRA Paper No. 108041, posted 31 May 2021 08:56 UTC Agri-food Impacts of Fukushima Nuclear Accident - Lessons Learned 10 Years after Disaster Hrabrin Bachev, Institute of Agricultural Economics, Sofia, [email protected] Abstract On March 11, 2011, the strongest ever recorded in Japan earthquake occurred which triggered a powerful tsunami and caused a nuclear accident in Fukushima nuclear plant. The latter was a “manmade” disaster having immense impacts on people’s life, health, and property, infrastructure, supply chains, economy, policies, natural and institutional environment, etc. This paper presents work in progress and assesses preparedness for and agri-food impacts of the Fukushima nuclear disaster, identifies challenges in post-disaster recovery, and withdraws lessons for improving disaster risk management. Japan was not well prepared for such a huge disaster while the agri-food sector and consumption have been among the worst-hit areas. The triple disaster was a rare but high-impact event, therefore, it is necessary to “prepare for the unexpected”. Risk assessment is to include diverse hazards and multiple effects of a likely disaster, it is to be discussed with all stakeholders, and measures taken to educate and train all for complex disasters. It is necessary to modernize property rights, regulations, safety standards, and norms, enhance the capability of responsible public authorities and improve coordination between diverse actors. It is important to set up mechanisms for effective public resource allocation and reduction of agents’ costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Fish Specimens Collected from the Tohoku District by the Saito Ho-On Kai Museum of Natural History
    Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci., Ser. A, 35(1), pp. 9–54, March 22, 2009 Historical Fish Specimens Collected from the Tohoku District by the Saito Ho-on Kai Museum of Natural History Keiichi Matsuura1, Gento Shinohara2 and Masanori Nakae1 1 Collection Center, National Museum of Nature and Science, 3–23–1 Hyakunin-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 169–0073 Japan E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 2 Department of Zoology, National Museum of Nature and Science, 3–23–1 Hyakunin-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 169–0073 Japan E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The fish collection of the Saito Ho-on Kai Museum of Natural History was transferred to the National Museum of Nature and Science, Tokyo in February 2006. Ninety percent of the fish collection contains specimens collected from the Tohoku District during the period from 1930 to 1933 when natural environments of Japan were in good condition for various groups of fishes. The fish specimens from the Tohoku District were classified into 361 species/subspecies of 273 genera belonging to 131 families of 31 orders. A list of the species is shown with remarks on distribution. Key words: Fish specimens, Saito Ho-on Kai Museum, Tohoku District, inventory. stead of natural sicence. The museum has tried to Introduction keep its activity at the level before the war, but it The Saito Ho-on Kai Museum was established failed to do so because of financial difficulties. In in November 1933 in Sendai City, Miyagi Pre- 2005, the Saito Ho-on Kai Museum of Natural fecture, Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • Feelin' Casual! Feelin' Casual!
    Feelin’ casual! Feelin’ casual! to SENDAI to YAMAGATA NIIGATA Very close to Aizukougen Mt. Chausu NIIGATA TOKYO . Very convenient I.C. Tohoku Expressway Only 50minutes by to NIKKO and Nasu Nasu FUKUSHIMA other locations... I.C. SHINKANSEN. JR Tohoku Line(Utsunomiya Line) Banetsu Utsunomiya is Kuroiso Expressway FUKUSHIMA AIR PORT Yunishigawa KORIYAMA your gateway to Tochigi JCT. Yagan tetsudo Line Shiobara Nasu Nishinasuno- shiobara shiobara I.C. Nishi- nasuno Tohoku Shinkansen- Kawaji Kurobane TOBU Utsunomiya Line Okukinu Kawamata 3 UTSUNO- UTSUNOMIYA MIYA I.C. Whole line opening Mt. Nantai Kinugawa Jyoutsu Shinkansen Line to traffic schedule in March,2011 Nikko KANUMA Tobu Bato I.C. Utsunomiya UTSUNOMIYA 2 to NAGANO TOCHIGI Line TOCHIGI Imaichi TSUGA Tohoku Shinkansen Line TAKA- JCT. MIBU USTUNOMIYA 6 SAKI KAMINOKAWA 1 Nagono JCT. IWAFUNE I.C. 1 Utsunomiya → Nikko JCT. Kitakanto I.C. Karasu Shinkansen Expressway yama Line HITACHI Ashio NAKAMINATO JR Nikko Line Utsunomiya Tohoku Shinkansen- I.C. I.C. TAKASAKI SHIN- Utsunomiya Line TOCHIGI Kanuma Utsunomiya Tobu Nikko Line IBARAKI AIR PORT Tobu Motegi KAWAGUCHI Nikko, where both Japanese and international travelers visit, is Utsuno- 5 JCT. miya MISATO OMIYA an international sightseeing spot with many exciting spots to TOCHIGI I.C. see. From Utsunomiya, you can enjoy passing through Cherry Tokyo blossom tunnels or a row of cedar trees on Nikko Highway. Utsunomiya Mashiko Tochigi Kaminokawa NERIMA Metropolitan Mibu I.C. Moka I.C. Expressway Tsuga I.C. SAPPORO JCT. Moka Kitakanto Expressway UENO Nishikiryu I.C. ASAKUSA JR Ryomo Line Tochigi TOKYO Iwafune I.C. Kasama 2 Utsunomiya → Kinugawa Kitakanto Expressway JCT.
    [Show full text]
  • Iwate University (In Iwate Prefecture)
    Iwate University (in Iwate Prefecture) We provide intellectual discoveries integrating knowledge, experience, and analysis. ■Profile of Iwate University There are approximately 5,400 students enrolled at Iwate ④ About Iwate ① Profile of Iwate University University, with 480 teaching faculty members and 270 With a population of 300,000, Morioka City is the Located in the prefectural capital Morioka, administrative staff to support them. Located in the center of largest community in Iwate Prefecture, and serves Iwate University is known for being the alma Morioka, all four faculties are on the same campus and are only a as the cultural and economic center of the region. mater of the famous author and poet, Kenji few minutes‘ walk form each other, which makes it easy for Morioka has an abundance of nature, and is Miyazawa. The university's main missions are: students and teachers to interact with each other beyond the known for its charm, history, and culinary delights, Disaster Recovery-Vitalization of Local Areas, departments. as well as four distinct seasons. It is a small but Development of Global Human Resources, and Iwate University is proud of its collection of nearly 500,000 comfortable city to live. Fostering Innovation. To this effect, Iwate valuable materials and relics provided by the hard work of past and There are many people from Iwate who have University has become known as a leader for present faculty members and students. played important roles in the areas of scholarship, recovery of areas affected by the Great East Access to the university's resources are not limited to students culture, and politics.
    [Show full text]