DOCSLIB.ORG

Mesquite Local News

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

COMMUNIITY Desert Dogs have rough week MESQUITE Page 1B OPINION Just say no to annual legislative LOCAL NEWS sessions THE WEEK OF APRIL 4, 2019 Vol. 15, No. 25 Page 4A WATER DISTRICT UP, UP AND AWAY Developers given window to request permit transfer By Linda Faas MLN The Virgin Valley Water District board took action April 2 to allow a temporary window of opportunity for active devel- opers who have paid development fees that they had previously been unable to use due to amended lot maps or transfer to another property according to VVWD regulations. Virgin Valley Water District has tak- en a number of steps in recent years to bring order and standard practices to its overall regulations for land developers, providing a more stable environment for budgeting and delivery of water service. Teri Nehrenz VVWD is the sole supplier of culinary Lance Bame and Cambria Olsen take flight with EAA Pilot and Young Eagle Chapter 765 Event Coordinator, David Amspok- water within its boundaries. Accurate er during the Young Eagles Free airplane rides that took place on March 30 at the Mesquite Airport. control of permitted “will-serve” obliga- tions it grants to developers wishing to tap into the district’s culinary water sys- tem is essential for planning and paying for expansion of water supply and infra- They came, they saw, they flew structure. Equivalent development unit fees are By Teri Nehrenz The planes that were brought up from The flight lasted between 15 and 20 levied on developers when they seek MLN Kingman were: A Cessna 172, Cirrus minutes, but most will remember this permission to build at a specific proper- Sr22, Grumnan Tiger, Cessna 182 and experience for the rest of their lives. ty location, as shown on their approved For 25 years, Young Eagles have taken a Grumnan Traveler according to the Back on the ground, there’s was more development map. Development plans to the skies in what may be the one sin- Young Eagles Event Coordinator for the time to ask questions about the flight. are frequently changed or delayed, po- gular experience that sparks a career, Chapter, David Amspoker. Kids also received an official Young -Ea tentially leaving in question when and or a hobby dedicated to flight. The Ex- While they were still on the ground, the gles logbook, which was signed by their where the district will be asked to pro- perimental Aircraft Association Young pilots explained what was going to hap- personal pilot, and their name was add- vide water hook-ups. The district board Eagles program was launched in 1992 to pen during the flight. This might include ed to a long list of Young Eagles in the adopted its twelfth revision of its Rules, give interested young people an oppor- talking about the airplane, reviewing an World’s Largest Logbook. Regulations, and Rates at its last meeting tunity to go flying in a general aviation aeronautical chart (or map), identifying LeMieux always tries to offer some- on March 19, 2019, reining in unused wa- airplane. reference points during the flight, com- thing new and exciting for everyone; ter service permits that might be reacti- These flights are offered free of charge pleting a careful “walk around” preflight along with the free airplane rides for the vated at an indefinite time. and are made possible through the gen- inspection of the airplane, and identify- kids, LeMieux has procured the help of The current policy (sec. 4-8-4) requires erosity of EAA member volunteers. ing the parts that control the airplane. Mesquite local Ingrid Martell. that a developer transfer any unused On Saturday, March 30, a group of Just before they took-off, the pilots The Martells generously agreed to EDU permit to a new property within a EAA Pilots from Chapter 765 out of helped the kids buckle their seat belts bring a balloon and offer some tethered year, and pay renewal fees on an annu- Kingman, Arizona, flew their experi- and describes the interior of the airplane, balloon rides for the day but after setting al basis until the EDU can be designated mental aircrafts down to Mesquite to of- including the instrument panel. up the balloon discovered that the winds for another property under all district fer this exciting experience to Mesquite When they were in the air, the kids ex- weren’t going to be cooperative. They rules and regulations. If the conditional children thanks to the local efforts of perienced a whole new view of the earth kept pitching the inflated balloon all over Larry LeMieux, who brings the program and sky. And, if they wanted to, some pi- > See VVWD, Page 2A to town each year. lots let their passengers take the controls. > See FLIGHT, Page 2A VIRGIN VALLEY HIGH Senior donkey gets a dramatic new family MLN Theater in Mesquite has become new and exciting again. The Virgin Valley Theatre Group members recently closed a production you may have heard of, “Trouble on the Train or How the Virgin Valley Got its Name.” The show was a huge success and sold a record number of tickets for the group. In that production were a bunch of crazy characters in- cluding a character named Donkey Shane. The Donkey Shane character required a costume that was loaned to them by Joan Dunkle, owner of the Peaceful Valley Donkey Rescue in Scenic, Arizona. Teri Nehrenz who played Hedda Cabbage in the produc- Teri Nehrenz tion went to PVDR to pick up the costume and met “Old The Wild Burro Project receives donkeys from BLM land all over the country and never know what to Bill,” a 30-plus year old donkey. expect. This baby was born on March 28 just two days before the picture was taken to a wild burro. The baby was born small and is under careful observation to ensure her survival. > See DONKEY, Page 2A IT’S GROW TIME! YOU’RE INVITED SATURDAY 102 W. Mesquite Blvd. APRIL 6 Mon. - Sat. 7AM-7PM | Sun. 9AM-4PM 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. 702-346-5277 Let us help you enjoy your outdoor space! Ace Hardware Supports the Desert Dogs Gardening Class 10 - 11 a.m. 2A MESQUITE LOCAL NEWS The Week of April 4, 2019 LETTER TO THE EDITOR Donkey continued from Page 1A FIRST RESPONDERS SHOULD would love to move to a wonderful small LIVE IN MESQUITE town, to raise there children here. We Nehrenz is also a current contestant just have to put ourselves out there. for the 2019 Ms. Senior Mesquite Pag- To the editor, Present our little town for the opportu- eant. Contestants raise money through Response to City Council removing nity that is here. ad sales and after the pageant the money Mesquite residency requirement, as The paychecks our First Responders is split between the women and given to reported in article by Barbara Elles- (police & fire) earn from Mesquite (tax- charities of the contestant’s choice. Af- tad, “Residency Requirement to be Re- payers) would then be spent outside of ter meeting Old Bill, Nehrenz decided moved,” Mesquite Local News - March our city, in Utah or Las Vegas grocery that PVDR would be the recipient of her 28, 2019 stores, hardware stores, hair salons, fundraising efforts this time around. I’m not good at writing my thoughts etc. The cast took up a collection to place and opinions, but I’m going to try. What What will happen to our business? an ad in the Ms. Senior Mesquite pro- the City Council voted on about our first ALSO, how long will he have to wait gram book wishing Nehrenz and the responders (Fire & Police officers) -be for an OFFICER DOWN when he needs other five ladies luck, but there was a ing able to move outside the Mesquite 15 HELP?! bit left over. With the extra money the mile limit is a stupid idea. We are not immune to a possible cast decided they would foster Old Bill Living in St. George, Utah, or Las Ve- school shooting, not things we want to during the time before the funds were to Teri Nehrenz gas, why? So their wives can be closer to think about. be dispersed. Old Bill poses for pictures with writ- shopping & entertainment? What are the City Council thinking? The additional money collected was ers and director of Trouble on the We can get good qualified people to Please Excuse my spelling and format of enough to foster Bill for one month and Train, Nancy Arnold and Sue Kjellsen, apply outside of the so called “poor gene this letter, I think I might be one of the on Saturday, March 30, cast members when they went out to meet their new pool” of Mesquite (shame on you to say poor gene pool. gathered at PVDR to meet their new charge. that). Sabine Reid charge. There are many police officers that Mesquite The meeting was a complete success her two-day old daughter across the and Bill was an instant hit among the road at the WBP; neither of the donkey’s group. Sucking up all the attention have names yet. they wanted to give, Old Bill won their Kjellsen was also enamored by the hearts and Trouble on the Train writers new baby and wanted to take her home Nancy Arnold and Sue Kjellsen gave but instead gave a little extra for the ba- some extra to foster Bill for two addi- by’s care as well. tional months. The baby is under the careful eyes of EVERY ING FOR YOUR SMALL BUSINESS.
Recommended publications
  • Circuit Court for Dorchester County Case No.: 09-C-16-023640 UNREPORTED

    Circuit Court for Dorchester County Case No.: 09-C-16-023640 UNREPORTED

    Circuit Court for Dorchester County Case No.: 09-C-16-023640 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 449 September Term, 2018 ______________________________________ MARGARET FLEISHELL v. MARK RITCHIE HOWARD ______________________________________ Graeff, Shaw Geter, Salmon, James P. (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned), JJ. ______________________________________ Opinion by Salmon, J. ______________________________________ Filed: May 3, 2019 * This is an unreported opinion, and it may not be cited in any paper, brief, motion, or other document filed in this Court or any other Maryland Court as either precedent within the rule of stare decisis or as persuasive authority. Md. Rule 1-104. —Unreported Opinion— On Memorial Day in 2015, Margaret Fleishell, the appellant, and Mark Howard, the appellee, were involved in a T-bone collision in an intersection near Denton, Maryland. Fleishell brought a negligence action against Howard in the Circuit Court for Dorchester County alleging that, under the Boulevard Rule, she was the favored driver and he had failed to yield the right of way to her. She further alleged that Howard’s failure to yield caused the collision. Mr. Howard, in turn, contended that Fleishell’s contributory negligence was a cause of the accident. At the close of discovery, Fleishell moved for partial summary judgment on the issues of negligence and contributory negligence. Following a hearing, the circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of Fleishell on the issue of Howard’s primary negligence, but denied the motion on the issue of Fleishell’s contributory negligence. The issues of Fleishell’s negligence and her damages were tried by a jury. Fleishell’s motions for judgment on the issue of contributory negligence were denied at the close of her case and at the close of all the evidence.
  • Survey of Maryland Court of Appeals Decisions 1975-1976

    Survey of Maryland Court of Appeals Decisions 1975-1976

    Maryland Law Review Volume 37 | Issue 1 Article 5 Survey of Maryland Court of Appeals Decisions 1975-1976 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr Recommended Citation Survey of Maryland Court of Appeals Decisions 1975-1976, 37 Md. L. Rev. 61 (1977) Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr/vol37/iss1/5 This Recent Decisions is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Journals at DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maryland Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Survey of Maryland Court of Appeals Decisions 1975-1976 I. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW 1. MARYLAND COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS - INVES- TIGATORY AND ENFORCEMENT POWERS - Banach v. State Commis- sion on Human Relations,' State Commission on Human Relations v. Amecom. 2 - Article 49B of the Maryland Annotated Code prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, marital status, or physical or mental handicap, and establishes the Commission on Human Relations, an administrative agency, to enforce the statutory anti-discrimination provisions. 3 The Commission has jurisdiction 4 over alleged discriminatory practices involving public accommodations, 6 7 employment,5 housing, and financing. When an individual believes that he is a victim of discrimination, he may file a complaint with the Commission.8 Moreover, the Commission. itself is authorized to file a complaint in its own name upon receipt of reliable information of a discriminatory practice, provided a preliminary investigation discloses that the filing of a complaint is warranted.
  • New York Criminal Law Newsletter a Publication of the Criminal Justice Section of the New York State Bar Association

    New York Criminal Law Newsletter a Publication of the Criminal Justice Section of the New York State Bar Association

    NYSBA WINTER 2018 | VOL. 16 | NO. 1 New York Criminal Law Newsletter A publication of the Criminal Justice Section of the New York State Bar Association In This Issue: n New Criminal Justice Legislation n Cell Phone Search and Seizure n Fraud Case Disclaimers n The REDEEM Act and Sealing n Photos from Nassau County Bar Event Get Ready for the 2018 Young Lawyers Section’s Trial Academy The Criminal Justice Section is pleased to co-sponsor the NYSBA Young Lawyers Section’s annual Trial Academy, and offer a scholarship to attend the Academy. The Young Lawyers Section Trial Acad- emy is the New York State Bar Association’s only comprehensive trial training program. This intensive five-day trial techniques and advocacy program is geared toward young and new lawyers—teaching, advancing, and improving the quality of their experience in the courtroom, in order to benefit their ca- reers and their client’s interests. The Trial Academy will be held Wednesday, April 4, through Sunday, April 8, 2018. Participating in the Trial Academy is the perfect opportunity to gain critically important trial ex- perience outside of the courtroom. Participants attend a morning lecture on an aspect of a trial and spend the afternoons in small groups with their designated team leader demonstrating the day’s trial skill from a previously provided fact pattern. One-on-one critiques will be provided by a rotating fac- ulty made up of NYSBA leadership and leading litigators, advocates and judges from every region of New York. The Trial Academy is open to any attorney wishing to learn or improve upon their trial skills and provides a unique opportunity for participants to have a meaningful experience which extends be- yond a typical classroom setting.
  • S:\COA Users\COAPOOL\85Hn08.Wpd

    S:\COA Users\COAPOOL\85Hn08.Wpd

    John Grady, et al. v. Darin Donell Brown No. 85, September Term, 2008. NEGLIGENCE AS A MATTER OF LAW - BOULEVARD RULE Respondent was not negligent as a matter of law in the motor tort suit brought by petitioners, despite entering on the roadway upon which petitioner Grady, the favored driver, traveled, because he stopped and yielded the right-of-way to petitioner. The Circuit Court properly applied the Boulevard Rule and did not err in denying petitioners’ Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict. In the Circuit Court for Baltimore City Case No. 24-C-05-008226 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 85 September Term, 2008 John Grady, et al. v. Darin Donell Brown Bell, C.J. Harrell Battaglia Greene Murphy Raker, Irma S. (Retired, specially assigned) Wilner, Alan M. (Retired, specially assigned) JJ. Opinion by Raker, J. Bell, C.J., and Harrrell and Wilner, JJ. Dissent. Filed: April 7, 2009 This motor tort case involves the Boulevard Rule. We must decide whether the Circuit Court for Baltimore City erred in denying petitioners’ Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict on the grounds that, based on the Boulevard Rule, respondent’s operation of his vehicle was negligent as a matter of law. The Court of Special Appeals affirmed, as shall we. I. This case arises from a motor vehicle accident which occurred on the morning of March 16, 2005, on Falkirk Road near the intersection of Gittings Avenue in Baltimore City. Petitioner Grady and his wife, Jacqueline Grady, filed an action sounding in negligence against respondent Brown and his father, Vern Milton Brown.1 Grady was operating his motorcycle on the favored highway, Falkirk Road, and Brown was operating a motor vehicle on the unfavored highway, an alley leading into Falkirk.
  • THE MARYLAND BOULEVARD RULE: a TIME for CHANGE Maryland's Boulevard Rule Has Survived Frequent Challenge and the Apparent Harshness of Its Results in Recent Cases

    THE MARYLAND BOULEVARD RULE: a TIME for CHANGE Maryland's Boulevard Rule Has Survived Frequent Challenge and the Apparent Harshness of Its Results in Recent Cases

    University of Baltimore Law Review Volume 6 Article 3 Issue 2 Spring 1977 1977 Notes and Comments: The aM ryland Boulevard Rule: A Time for Change John William Debelius III University of Baltimore School of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ublr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Debelius, John William III (1977) "Notes and Comments: The aM ryland Boulevard Rule: A Time for Change," University of Baltimore Law Review: Vol. 6: Iss. 2, Article 3. Available at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ublr/vol6/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Baltimore Law Review by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTES AND COMMENTS THE MARYLAND BOULEVARD RULE: A TIME FOR CHANGE Maryland's boulevard rule has survived frequent challenge and the apparent harshness of its results in recent cases. The author examines the development and application of the rule and questions both the historical bases and judicial justifications for the rule's modern viability. I. INTRODUCTION Several Maryland decisions in the past few years point once again to the need for a critical re-evaluation of the Maryland boulevard rule. 1 The stream of cases trying unsuccessfully to carve exceptions into the rule continues, and while inequity is no stranger to the application of this curious rule, the recent trend toward absoluteness in its interpretation by the courts is disturbing.
  • 1 the Court Notes That Defendant Evans Has Filed an Amended Motion for Summary Judgment

    1 the Court Notes That Defendant Evans Has Filed an Amended Motion for Summary Judgment

    Case 8:04-cv-01005-AW Document 41 Filed 08/03/05 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND SOUTHERN DIVISION DAVID B. MARCHISILLO, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. AW-04-1005 v. KENNETH LOUIS DAVIS, and CORY DWIGHT EVANS, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff David B. Marchisillo (“Plaintiff” or “Marchisillo”) bring this diversity action against Defendants Kenneth Louis Davis (“Davis”) and Cory Dwight Evans (“Evans”) (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging a sole claim of negligence stemming from personal injuries sustained by Plaintiff in an automobile accident. Currently before the Court are the following motions: Davis’s Motion for Summary Judgment [29], Evans’s Motion for Summary Judgment [33], and Davis’s Motion to Strike Affidavit [39]. The Court has reviewed the pleadings and applicable law and has determined that a hearing is unnecessary. See Local Rule 105(6) (D. Md. 2004). For the following reasons, both Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment and Defendant Davis’s Motion to Strike are denied.1 FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The following facts are taken in the light most favorable to the non-movant. On April 3, 2001, at approximately 11:30 a.m., Marchisillo and his son were traveling in Marchisillo’s van, driving his son home 1 The Court notes that Defendant Evans has filed an Amended Motion for Summary Judgment. Because the substance of that motion appears to be duplicative of Evans’s prior Motion for Summary Judgment, the Amended Motion is similarly denied. Case 8:04-cv-01005-AW Document 41 Filed 08/03/05 Page 2 of 11 to buy some food.
  • Transcript, Thus

    Transcript, Thus

    1 1 BEFORE THE NEW YORK STATE SENATE FINANCE AND ASSEMBLY WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEES 2 ---------------------------------------------------- 3 JOINT LEGISLATIVE HEARING 4 In the Matter of the 2018-2019 EXECUTIVE BUDGET 5 ON TRANSPORTATION 6 ---------------------------------------------------- 7 Hearing Room B 8 Legislative Office Building Albany, New York 9 January 25, 2018 10 9:37 a.m. 11 12 PRESIDING: 13 Senator Catharine M. Young Chair, Senate Finance Committee 14 Assemblywoman Helene E. Weinstein 15 Chair, Assembly Ways & Means Committee 16 PRESENT: 17 Senator Liz Krueger Senate Finance Committee (RM) 18 Assemblyman Robert Oaks 19 Assembly Ways & Means Committee (RM) 20 Senator Diane J. Savino Vice Chair, Senate Finance Committee 21 Assemblyman David Gantt 22 Chair, Assembly Committee on Transportation 23 24 2 1 2018-2019 Executive Budget Transportation 2 1-25-18 3 PRESENT: (Continued) 4 Assemblywoman Amy Paulin Chair, Assembly Committee on Corporations, 5 Authorities & Commissions 6 Assemblyman Phil Steck 7 Assemblyman James Skoufis 8 Senator Timothy Kennedy 9 Assemblyman Steven Otis 10 Senator Martin Malave Dilan 11 Assemblywoman Vivian E. Cook 12 Assemblywoman Nily Rozic 13 Assemblyman David G. McDonough 14 Senator Gustavo Rivera 15 Assemblywoman Pamela J. Hunter 16 Assemblywoman Alicia Hyndman 17 Senator Leroy Comrie 18 Assemblywoman Nicole Malliotakis 19 Senator Todd Kaminsky 20 Assemblyman Robert C. Carroll 21 Assemblywoman Earlene Hooper 22 Assemblyman Kevin Byrne 23 Assemblyman John T. McDonald III 24 Assemblywoman Jaime R. Williams 3 1 2018-2019 Executive Budget Transportation 2 1-25-18 3 PRESENT: (Continued) 4 Assemblywoman Jo Anne Simon 5 Assemblyman David Buchwald 6 Assemblyman Félix W. Ortiz 7 8 LIST OF SPEAKERS 9 STATEMENT QUESTIONS 10 Joseph J.
  • Oran's Dictionary of The

    Oran's Dictionary of The

    ORAN’S DICTIONARY OF THE LAW 3rd Edition Daniel Oran, J.D. Mark Tosti, J.D. Contributing Author Africa • Australia • Canada • Denmark • Japan • Mexico • New Zealand • Philippines • Puerto Rico • Singapore • Spain United Kingdom • United States NOTICE TO THE READER Publisher does not warrant or guarantee any of the products described herein or perform any independent analysis in connection with any of the product information contained herein. Publisher does not assume, and expressly disclaims, any obligation to obtain and include information other than that provided to it by the manufacturer. The reader is notified that this text is an educational tool, not a practice book. Since the law is in constant change, no rule or statement of law in this book should be relied upon for any service to any client. The reader should always refer to standard legal sources for the current rule or law. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of the appropriate professional should be sought. The Publisher makes no representation or warranties of any kind, including but not limited to, the warranties of fitness for particular purpose or merchantability, nor are any such representations implied with respect to the material set forth herein, and the publisher takes no responsibility with respect to such material. The publisher shall not be liable for any special, consequential, or exemplary damages resulting, in whole or part, from the readers’ use of, or reliance upon, this material. West Legal Studies Staff: Business Unit Director: Susan Simpfenderfer Executive Acquisitions Editor: Marlene McHugh Pratt Acquisitions Editor: Joan Gill Editorial Assistant: Lisa Flatley Executive Marketing Manager: Donna Lewis Channel Manager: Nigar Hale Executive Production Manager: Wendy Troeger Production Editor: Betty L.