Advances Toward Cure Volume 27 Issue 4 December 2019/January 2020

Perspective Advances Toward a Cure for HIV: Getting Beyond n=2

Achieving a cure for HIV remains a priority in HIV research. Two cases of ‘ster- long-term complications of HIV despite ilizing cure’ have been observed—in Timothy Ray Brown and the “London” ART, including evidence for accelerated patient; both patients received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplan- aging and increased risks of cognitive tation (HSCT) from donors homozygous for the CCR5-delta 32 deletion, which dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, impairs function of an HIV coreceptor on host cells. Other strategies that have renal disease, and other complica- been evaluated for achieving sterilizing cure or functional cure—ie, sustained tions.3-6 All of these factors provide a virologic remission in the absence of antiretroviral therapy (ART)—include: strong rationale for pursuing cure for HSCT with wild-type CC chemokine receptor (CCR5); early ART to limit size HIV infection. of the HIV latent reservoir; shock and kill strategies using latency reversing agents and/or anti-HIV broadly neutralizing antibodies; and , Mechanisms of HIV Persistence including attempts to modify CCR5 genes, HIV proviruses in autologous host cells, or enhanced T cells. This article summarizes a presentation by Jonathan Data from long-term follow-up of a co- Li, MD, MMSc, at the International Antiviral Society-USA (IAS-USA) continuing hort of patients on ART indicate that education program held in Atlanta, Georgia, in March 2019. the HIV reservoir, indicated by levels of HIV DNA in CD4+ cells and periph- Keywords: HIV cure, CCR5-delta 32 deletion, London patient, post-treatment eral blood mononuclear cells, initially controllers, early ART, shock and kill, gene therapy. declines during ART but plateaus at around 4 years and remains stable thereafter (Figure 1).7 Key factors in HIV HIV cure remains a priority of research ever, it is currently estimated that only persistence include viral integration in HIV infection management and 75% of infected individuals know of into the host cell genome and that the treatment. Pursuing this goal requires their infection status, 59% are on treat- integrated provirus can become latent identifying and developing strate- ment, and 47% have viral suppression.2 or silent, such that little viral RNA or gies to overcome mechanisms of HIV There are numerous issues that con- proteins are being expressed that would persistence to induce and maintain tribute to suboptimal ART treatment permit the immune system to recog- HIV remission. and retention in care. Many infected nize and target the infected cells. individuals are asymptomatic, leading Other factors may contribute to HIV Update on the Epidemic to delayed diagnosis, denial, or com- persistence. For example, some re- placency. Other factors that contribute searchers believe that there continues The advent of effective combination to gaps in the cascade of care include to be active viral replication in patients antiretroviral therapy (ART) has resulted challenges in accessing affordable and on ART, particularly within certain tis- in marked declines in HIV mortality consistent care, ART intolerability, pill sues or compartments where ART lev- and incidence. However, there remains fatigue, drug-drug interactions, stigma, els may be suboptimal.8,9 However, this much work to be done in battling the life chaos, substance abuse, and chal- is a relatively controversial hypothesis, epidemic. Joint United Nations Pro- lenges in connecting with hard-to- with the predominance of evidence gramme on HIV and AIDS (UNAIDS)/ reach populations. Further, there are demonstrating the lack of active viral World Health Organization (WHO) data indicate that there are more than 37 10,000 l million people globally living with HIV infection. Of these, 23 million are on 1 1000 u l A RT. There are 1.8 million new infec- l l l tions and nearly 800,000 AIDS-related u u u u deaths each year. The WHO introduced 100 the 90-90-90 initiative, aimed at achiev- ing awareness of infection status in 90% 10

PBMCs or CD4+ Cells 6 of infected individuals, having 90% of 6 l Total HIV-1 DNA copies/10 PBMCs 6

10 u Total HIV-1 DNA copies/10 CD4+ cells those individuals maintained on treat- DNA Copies per HIV-1 Total 1 ment, and achieving virologic suppres- 0 1 4 7 10 sion in 90% of those on treatment. How- Years on ART

Dr Li is Assistant Professor of Medicine at Figure 1. Persistence of the HIV reservoir, indicated by levels of HIV DNA in CD4+ cells and Brigham and Women’s Hospital at Harvard peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), during antiretroviral therapy (ART).Adapted from Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts. Besson, et al.7 91 IAS–USA Topics in Antiviral Medicine

ART ART More recently, details have been presented about the “London patient.” 107 p This patient had

106 and also received allogeneic HSCT with cells from a donor homozygous for the 105 CCR5 delta 32 deletion. The patient p 104 p had viral rebound during ART inter- ruption and achieved resuppression 3 p 10 with resumption of ART. After approxi- Copies RNA/mL HIV-1 102 p mately 18 months, ART was stopped, p and the patient has been free of viral p p p pp pp pp p p p p p p p p rebound for more than 2 years off ART 0 23 −227 −226 −85 −4 +61 +108 +159 +332 +391 +416 +548 (Figure 3). Differences between Mr Brown and First SCT the London patient include the fact that AML relapse Rectal biopsy AML relapse Second SCT AML diagnosis 100% chimerism Days 100% chimerism Mr Brown was initially heterozygous for the CCR5 delta 32 deletion, whereas the London patient was homozygous Figure 2. HIV remission in Timothy Brown by allogenic hematopoietic skin cell transplant for wild-type CCR5 before the trans- from a donor with the chemokine receptor 5–delta 32 deletion. Abbreviations: AML, acute myeloid leukemia; ART, antiretroviral therapy; SCT, gene for a human hormone secretion. plant. For AML, Mr Brown underwent Adapted from Hutter et al.22 2 HSCTs, total body irradiation, and full intensity conditioning chemother- replication in patients on fully suppres- allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell apy. For lymphoma, the London pa- sive ART.10-12 Another cause of HIV per- transplantation (HSCT), requiring condi- tient underwent a single HSCT, re- sistence lies in the infection of long- tioning chemotherapy and whole-body ceived no irradiation, and underwent lived cells as memory CD4+ cells and irradiation. In the search for a donor reduced-intensity conditioning. The hematopoietic progenitor cells.13 Fur- for the transplant, his physicians iden- mechanisms for T-cell depletion in the ther, infected cells, particularly CD4+ tified one who was both an HLA match 2 patients also differed. Perhaps the cells, can undergo homeostatic or clonal for Mr Brown and who was homozy- take-home lesson from the comparison proliferation, expanding the HIV reser- gous for the CCR5-delta 32 deletion. is that the highly toxic conditioning reg- voir.14-18 Finally, B cell follicles within As shown in Figure 2, Mr Brown’s viral imen and whole-body irradiation Mr lymph nodes act as an “immune sanctu- load increased during ART interrup- Brown received may not be necessary ary” that prevents access of HIV-specific tion for chemotherapy, and decreased for HIV eradication, that the same re- CD8+ cells, potentially allowing persis- when ART was resumed prior to trans- sult can be achieved with less intense tence of virus within lymph nodes.19,20 plantation.22 ART was stopped when he conditioning and without radiation. received a first transplantation, with no Together, the cases point to the impor- tance of the donor being homozygous Cure—Success Stories viral rebound. He subsequently experi- enced leukemic relapse and underwent for the CCR5-delta 32 deletion, but One example of cure is Timothy Ray a second transplantation, and has now additional studies will be needed to Brown (initially known as the “Ber- been HIV-free for more than 12 years assess the impact of other factors, such lin patient”). To understand this case off ART. as graft-versus-host reactions. it needs to be understood that HIV requires a CD4 receptor and a core- ART ART ceptor to gain entry to the host cell, 10,000 600 n

especially the CC chemokine receptor 5 CD4+ Cells/µL l (CCR5). Individuals have been iden- 1,000 400 n n tified who are naturally resistant to n n l n n n acquiring HIV infection with the most n n 100 200 frequently transmitted CCR5-tropic vi- l ¢l ¢l¢l ¢l ¢l ¢l ¢l ¢l ¢l ¢ll ¢lll ¢l¢l¢l¢l¢l¢l ¢l¢l ¢l¢l ¢l ¢l¢l¢l ¢l rus due to the presence of a deletion in l Copies ofRNA/mL HIV the CCR5 gene, called the CCR5-delta 10 0 −215 −141 −27 +29 +77 +150 +424 +510 +1028 32 deletion, that impairs expression of 0 the CCR5 receptor.21 Days Timothy Ray Brown was living with HIV infection when he was diagnosed Figure 3. HIV remission in the London patient following CC chemokine receptor 5-delta 32/ with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). To delta 32 deletion hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. ART indicates antiretroviral therapy. treat the leukemia, he was to undergo Adapted from Gupta et al.23 92 Advances Toward Cure Volume 27 Issue 4 December 2019/January 2020

Timothy Brown and the London for 8 months (Figure 4).28 Although no PTCs.31 PTCs accounted for 13% of par- patient represent achievement of a sterilizing cure was achieved, the find- ticipants who had early ART versus 4% sterilizing HIV cure, in which there is ings indicate that depletion of the HIV of participants who began ART during no functional HIV remaining in the reservoir can result in suppression lon- chronic infection (P < .01), suggesting body. However, HSCTs are associated ger than the typical 2 to 4 weeks after that early ART may lower the barrier with substantial morbidity and mor- stopping ART. Both patients were found to achieving HIV remission. Of note, tality. A more realistic goal may be a to have acute retroviral rebound syn- studies of ART initiation during the functional cure, consisting of sustained drome, likely as their post-transplant very earliest stages of HIV infection virologic remission and HIV suppres- immune system was functionally naive (ie, Fiebig I) did not identify any PTCs, sion in the absence of ART. Such sus- to HIV. which raises the possibility that a slight tained remission has been observed Early HIV treatment has been shown delay in ART initiation may lead to a in HIV controllers or long-term non- to reduce the size of the HIV reservoir to more robust immune response.32 progressors and in HIV post-treatment a level below that seen in patients start- The shock and kill strategy is an controllers (PTCs). A great deal of data ing ART during chronic infection.29,30 approach to reawaken latently infected from AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) It has not been clear whether the re- cells through use of a latency revers- studies indicate that viral rebound gen- duction with early treatment might ing agent that can stimulate HIV RNA erally occurs between 2 and 4 weeks preferentially lead to post-treatment and protein production, while enhanc- after interrupting suppressive ART.24 control. In the VISCONTI study, all par- ing the immune system’s ability to However, con-siderable variation has ticipants had received early ART, and kill these cells, for example, through also been ob-served in time to rebound there was no comparison group of par- the use of a therapeutic vaccine or and there are individuals who are able ticipants who had started ART during an HIV broadly neutralizing antibody to maintain viral suppression for a chronic infection. In the CHAMP (Con- (bNAB). The approach would be used prolonged period after ART discontinu- trol of HIV After Antiretroviral Medica- while patients are maintained on sup- ation. Several years ago, the French tion Pause) study, 14 North American pressive ART, so that no new infection VISCONTI study identified 14 individu- clinical trials were analyzed and 67 of cells will occur despite the stimula- als who started ART early in infection participants were identified who were tion of virus production. A recent study and who maintained virologic suppres sion after interrupting ART.25 The iden- Patient 1 107 tification of these PTCs has led to in- ¢l l ART 6 ¢l creased interest in finding strategies for 10 ¢l HIV remission 5 ¢l 10 ¢l¢l¢l A A ¢l 104 R R Strategies for Inducing HIV T T ¢l 3 ¢l¢l ¢l Remission 10 ¢l ¢l ¢l ¢l 2 ¢l 10 ¢l¢l ¢l ¢l

Among the approaches being investi- Copies/mL RNA Level, HIV-1 ¢l ¢l¢l ¢l ¢l ¢l ¢l ¢l ¢l gated for inducing HIV remission and 101 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 transforming patients into PTCs are: HIV-1 Days After Analytic Treatment Interruption bone marrow transplantation (BMT) DNA (+ or −) − − − − − + with CCR5 wild-type donors; early HIV treatment; shock and kill strategies, Patient 2 and gene therapy, among others. 107 ART ¢l Individuals who naturally have the 106 CCR5-delta 32 deletion are rare; a gene ¢l 105 frequency of approximately 10% is ¢l 26 found in those of European descent. 104 ¢l Thus, people with HIV are far more ¢l 103 likely to receive a HSCT from a donor ¢l ¢l 102 with wild-type CCR5 cells. The cases ¢l ¢l HIV-1 RNA Level, Copies/mL RNA Level, HIV-1 ¢l ¢l ¢l ¢l ¢l ¢l ¢l ¢l ¢l ¢l ¢l ¢l ¢l ¢l ¢l¢l ¢l ¢l ¢l ¢l ¢l ¢l ¢l of 2 “Boston BMT patients” showed 101 that allogeneic HSCT from donors with 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 wild-type CCR5 resulted in delayed Days After Analytic Treatment Interruption HIV-1 HIV rebound. After transplantation, no DNA (+ or −) − − − − − − − − − + evidence of HIV DNA was detected.27 After analytic treatment interruption, Figure 4. Delayed viral rebound in the Boston bone marrow transplant (BMT) patients, who 1 patient maintained virologic sup- received donor cells with wild-type CC chemokine receptor-5 (CCR5). ART indicates antiret- pression for 3 months and the other roviral therapy (indicated by shaded areas). Adapted from Henrich et al.28

93 IAS–USA Topics in Antiviral Medicine

in SHIV-infected monkeys examined competent HIV-1 persist, wax, and wane. this approach using a toll-like receptor References Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(11): 1. World Health Organization (WHO). HIV/ E2575-E2584. 7 (TLR7) agonist (GS-9620) as a latency AIDS: data and statistics. https://www. 18. Reeves DB, Duke ER, Wagner TA, Palmer reversing agent combined with an who.int//data/en/. Accessed on Novem- SE, Spivak AM, Schiffer JT. A majority of 33 ber 26, 2019. HIV persistence during antiretroviral ther- anti-HIV bNAb. After treatment inter- 2. World Health Organization (WHO). HIV apy is due to infected cell proliferation. ruption, rebound was observed in fewer testing and care continuum (2018). https:// Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4811. monkeys receiving both the latency www.who.int/hiv/data/2018_hiv-continu- 19. Fukazawa Y, Lum R, Okoye AA, et al. B um-care.png. Accessed on November cell follicle sanctuary permits persistent reversing agent and the antibody than 26, 2019. productive simian immunodeficiency vi- in those receiving either alone or nei- 3. Hasse B, Ledergerber B, Furrer H, et al. rus infection in elite controllers. Nat Med. 2015;21(2):132-139. ther. There is also some evidence that Morbidity and aging in HIV-infected per- sons: the Swiss HIV cohort study. Clin In- 20. Banga R, Procopio FA, Noto A, et al. PD- the use of bNAbs alone may be able to fect Dis. 2011;53(11):1130-1139. 1(+) and follicular helper T cells are re- induce long-term HIV remission.34 4. Freiberg MS, Chang CC, Kuller LH, et sponsible for persistent HIV-1 transcrip- al. HIV infection and the risk of acute tion in treated aviremic individuals. Nat One gene therapy approach that has myocardial infarction. JAMA Intern Med. Med. 2016;22(7):754-761. been investigated is use of zinc-finger 2013;173(8):614-622. 21. Samson M, Libert F, Doranz BJ, Rucker nucleases targeting the CCR5 gene. In 5. Althoff KN, Rebeiro P, Brooks JT, et al. Dis- J. Resistance to HIV-1 infection in cauca- parities in the quality of HIV care when sian individuals in bearing mutant alleles one study, CD4+ cells were taken from using US Department of Health and Hu- of the CCR-5 chemokine receptor gene. individuals with HIV infection, modified man Services indicators. Clin Infect Dis. Nature. 1996;382(6593):722-725. in the laboratory with the zinc-finger 2014;58(8):1185-1189. 22. Hutter G, Nowak D, Mossner M, et al. 6. Hanna DB, Ramaswamy C, Kaplan RC, Long-term control of HIV by CCR5 Del- nucleases with the aim of modifying et al. Trends in cardiovascular disease ta32/Delta32 stem-cell transplantation. N the CCR5 gene to contain the dele- mortality among persons with HIV in Engl J Med. 2009;360(7):692-698. 35 New York City, 2001-2012. Clin Infect Dis. 23. Gupta RK, Abdul-Jawad S, McCoy LE, et tions, and reinfused into the patient. 2016;63(8):1122-1129. al. HIV-1 remission following CCR5Del- All participants had viral rebound dur- 7. Besson GJ, Lalama CM, Bosch RJ, et al. ta32/Delta32 haematopoietic stem-cell ing treatment interruption, although HIV-1 DNA decay dynamics in blood transplantation. Nature. 2019;568(7751): during more than a decade of suppres- 244-248. one participant exhibited suppression sive antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 24. Li JZ, Etemad B, Ahmed H, et al. The size before the interruption ended and ART 2014;59(9):1312-1321. of the expressed HIV reservoir predicts was resumed. This participant was ini- 8. Fletcher CV, Staskus K, Wietgrefe SW, et timing of viral rebound after treatment al. Persistent HIV-1 replication is associ- interruption. AIDS. 2016;30(3):343-353. tially heterozygous for the CCR5-delta ated with lower antiretroviral drug con- 25. Saez-Cirion A, Bacchus C, Hocqueloux 32 deletion. It is believed that this par- centrations in lymphatic tissues. Proc Natl L, et al. Post-treatment HIV-1 controllers ticular strategy is not efficient in mod- Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(6):2307-2312. with a long-term virological remission af- 9. Lorenzo-Redondo R, Fryer HR, Bedford ter the interruption of early initiated anti- ifying the cells to contain the CCR5 T, et al. Persistent HIV-1 replication main- retroviral therapy ANRS VISCONTI Study. deletions, but that achieving the mod- tains the tissue reservoir during therapy. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(3):e1003211. ( ) ification may be more likely in individ- Nature. 2016;530 7588 :51-56. 26. Martinson JJ, Chapman NH, Rees DC, 10. Kearney MF, Spindler J, Shao W, et al. Lack Liu YT, Clegg JB. Global distribution of uals already heterozygous for the dele- of detectable HIV-1 molecular evolution the CCR5 gene 32-basepair deletion. Nat tion. Some data from ongoing studies during suppressive antiretroviral therapy. Genet. 1997;16(1):100-103. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(3):e1004010. support the idea that alteration of viral 27. Henrich TJ, Hu Z, Li JZ, et al. Long-term 11. Van Zyl GU, Katusiime MG, Wiegand A, reduction in peripheral blood HIV type kinetics with this approach is more et al. No evidence of HIV replication in 1 reservoirs following reduced-intensity likely in heterozygous patients. How- children on antiretroviral therapy. J Clin conditioning allogeneic stem cell trans- Invest. 2017;127(10):3827-3834. plantation. J Infect Dis. 2013;207(11): ever, much work remains to be done 12. Rosenbloom DIS, Hill AL, Laskey SB, Silicia- 1694-1702. in this field. no RF. Re-evaluating evolution in the HIV 28. Henrich TJ, Hanhauser E, Marty FM, et al. Other approaches that are being eval- reservoir. Nature. 2017;551(7681):E6-E9. Antiretroviral-free HIV-1 remission and 13. Carter CC, Onafuwa-Nuga A, McNamara viral rebound after allogeneic stem cell uated include enhancing T-cell activity LA, et al. HIV-1 infects multipotent pro- transplantation: report of 2 cases. Ann In- with the use of chimeric antigen re- genitor cells causing cell death and estab- tern Med. 2014;161(5):319-327. ceptors (CARs), an approach that is lishing latent cellular reservoirs. Nat Med. 29. Buzon MJ, Martin-Gayo E, Pereyra F, et al. 2010;16(4):446-451. Long-term antiretroviral treatment initi- currently being utilized in the oncology 14. Bui JK, Sobolewski MD, Keele BF, et al. ated at primary HIV-1 infection affects field and is being evaluated for HIV.36 Proviruses with identical sequences com- the size, composition, and decay kinetics prise a large fraction of the replication- of the reservoir of HIV-1-infected CD4 T There are also attempts to silence the competent HIV reservoir. PLoS Pathog. cells. J Virol. 2014;88(17):10056-10065. HIV provirus, including through the use 2017;13(3):e1006283. 30. Ananworanich J, Chomont N, Eller LA, of CRISPR proviral gene editing37 or 15. Wiegand A, Spindler J, Hong FF, et al. Sin- et al. HIV DNA set point is rapidly estab- 38 gle-cell analysis of HIV-1 transcriptional lished in acute HIV infection and dramati- inhibition of the HIV Tat function. activity reveals expression of proviruses cally reduced by early ART. EBioMedicine. in expanded clones during ART. Proc 2016;11:68-72. Presented by Dr Li in March 2019. First Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(18):E3659- 31. Namazi G, Fajnzylber JM, Aga E, et al. The draft prepared from transcripts by Matthew E3668. control of HIV after antiretroviral medica- Stenger. Reviewed and edited by Dr Li in 16. Hiener B, Horsburgh BA, Eden JS, et al. tion pause (CHAMP) study: posttreatment Identification of genetically intact HIV-1 controllers identified from 14 clinical stud- November 2019. proviruses in specific CD4(+) T cells from ies. J Infect Dis. 2018;218(12):1954-1963. effectively treated participants. Cell Rep. Financial affiliations in the past 12 months: 32. Colby D, Chomont N, Kroon E, et al. HIV 2017;21(3):813-822. RNA rebound postinterruption in persons Dr Li has served as a consultant to Jan Bio- 17. Wang Z, Gurule EE, Brennan TP, et al. Ex- suppressed in Fiebig I acute HIV. Poster tech. (Updated 11/22/19 panded cellular clones carrying replication- presented at: 24th Conference on Ret-

94 Advances Toward Cure Volume 27 Issue 4 December 2019/January 2020

roviruses and Opportunistic Infections 35. Tebas P, Stein D, Tang WW, et al. Gene ed- cortistatin A, a "block-and-lock" strat- (CROI); February 13-16, 2017; Seattle, iting of CCR5 in autologous CD4 T cells of egy for HIV-1 treatment. Cell Rep. 2017; Washington. persons infected with HIV. N Engl J Med. 21(3):600-611. 33. Borducchi E, Abbink P, Nkolola J, Lewis 2014;370(10):901-910. 36. Kim GB, Hege K, Riley JL. CAR talk: how MG, Geleziunas R, Barouch D. PGT121 Top Antivir Med. 2019;27(4):$$$-$$$. combined with GS-9620 delays viral re- cancer-specific CAR T cells can instruct bound in SHIV-infected rhesus monkeys. how to build CAR T cells to cure HIV. ©2019, IAS–USA. All rights reserved [CROI Abstract 73LB] In Special Issue: Front Immunol. 2019;10:2310. Abstracts From the 2018 Conference on 37. Dash PK, Kaminski R, Bella R, et al. Se- Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. quential LASER ART and CRISPR treat- Top Antivir Med. 2018;26(suppl 1):29s. ments eliminate HIV-1 in a subset of 34. Mendoza P, Gruell H, Nogueira L, et al. infected humanized mice. Nat Commun. Combination therapy with anti-HIV-1 2019;10(1):2753. antibodies maintains viral suppression. 38. Kessing CF, Nixon CC, Li C, et al. In vivo Nature. 2018;561(7724):479-484. suppression of HIV rebound by didehydro-

95