DOCSLIB.ORG

Case List: 1. Singer Sewing Machine Vs. NLRC, 193 SCRA 271 2. Manila Golf Club Vs. IAC, 237 SCRA 207 3. Encyclopedia Britanica V

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Case List: 1. Singer Sewing Machine Vs. NLRC, 193 SCRA 271 2. Manila Golf Club Vs. IAC, 237 SCRA 207 3. Encyclopedia Britanica V Case List: 1. Singer Sewing Machine vs. NLRC, 193 SCRA 271 2. Manila Golf Club vs. IAC, 237 SCRA 207 3. Encyclopedia Britanica vs. NLRC, 264 SCRA 4 [96] 4. Carungcong vs. Sunlife, 283 SCRA 319 5. Ramos vs. CA, 380 SCRA 467 6. Sonza vs. ABS-CBN, G.R. No. 138051, June 10, 2004 7. Lazaro vs. Social Security Commission, 435 SCRA 472 [2004] 8. Phil. Global Communication vs. De Vera, 459 SCRA 260 [2005] 9. ABS-CBN vs. Nazareno, G.R. No. 164156, Sept. 26, 2006 10. Francisco vs. NLRC, 500 SCRA 690 [06] 11. Nogales et al., vs. Capitol Medical Center et al., G.R. No. 142625, December 19, 2006 12. Coca-Cola Bottlers Phils., vs. Dr. Climaco, G.R. No. 146881, February 15, 2007 13. Calamba Medical Center vs. NLRC et al., G.R. No. 176484, Nov. 25, 2008 14. Escasinas et al., vs. Shangri-las Mactan Island Resort et al., G.R. No. 178827, March 4, 2009 15. Tongko vs. Manufacturer Life Insurance Co. (Phils), Inc., et al., G.R. No. 167622, January 25, 2011 16. Caong, Jr. vs. Begualos, GR No. 179428, Jan. 26, 2011 17. Atok Big Wedge Company vs. Gison, G.R. No. 169510, August 8, 2011 18. Semblante et al., vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 196426, August 15, 2011 19. Bernarte vs. Phil. Basketball Association et al., G.R. No. 192084, September 14, 2011 20. Lirio vs. Genovia, G.r. No. 169757, November 23, 2011 21. Jao vs. BCC Products Sales Inc. G.R. No. 163700, April 18, 2012 22. Legend Hotel (Manila) vs. Realuyo G.R. No. 153511, July 18, 2012 23. The New Philippine Skylanders, Inc., vs. Dakila, G.r. No. 199547, Sept. 24, 2012 University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Labor Standards 1 24. Tesoro et al., vs. Metro Manila Retreaders Inc., et al., GR No. 171482, March 12, 2014 25. Ollendorf vs. Abrahanson, 38 Phil 585 26. Del Castillo vs. Richmond, 45 Phil. 679 27. PT&T vs. NLRC, 272 SCRA 596 [1997] 28. Duncan Asso. Of Detailman-PTGWO vs. Glaxo Wellcome Phils., G.R. No. 162994, Sept. 17, 2004 29. City of Manila vs. Laguio, G.R. No. 118127, April 12, 2005 30. Star Paper Corp., vs. Simbol, G.R. No. 164774, April 12, 2006 31. Del Monte Phils vs. Velasco, G.R. No. 153477, March 6, 2007 32. Yrasuegui vs. Phil Air Lines, G.R. No. 168081, October 17, 2008 33. Ilaw at Buklod ng Manggagawa vs. NLRC, 198 SCRA 586 [1991] 34. Employers Confederation of the Phils., vs. NWPC, 201 SCRA 759 [1991] 35. Mabeza vs. NLRC, 271 SCRA 670 36. Joy Brothers Inc., vs. NWPC, 273 SCRA 622 [1997] 37. Prubankers Asso. Vs. Prudential Bank, 302 SCRA 74 [1999] 38. Millare vs. NLRC, 305 SCRA 501 39. International School Alliance of Educators vs. Quisumbing, 333 SCRA 13 [2000] 40. Bankard Employees Union vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 140689, Feb. 17, 2004 41. Odango vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 147420, June 10, 2004 42. C. Planas Commercial vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 144619, Nov. 11, 2005 43. EJR Crafts Corp., vs. CA, G.R. No. 154101, March 10, 2006 44. Pag Asa Steel Works vs. CA, G.R. No. 166647, March 31, 2006 45. Metropolitan Bank vs. NWPC, G.R. No. 144322, Feb. 6, 2007 46. Equitable Bank vs. Sadac, G.R. No. 164772, June 8, 2006, citing Songco vs. NLRC, 183 SCRA 618 47. S.I.P. Food House et al., vs. Batolina, GR No. 192473, Oct 11, 2010 University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Labor Standards 2 48. SLL International Cables Specialist vs. NLRC, GR No. 172161, March 2, 2011 49. Vergara, Jr. vs. Coca-Cola Bottlers Phils Inc. G.R. No. 176985, April 1, 2013 50. Royal Plant Workers Union vs. Coca-Cola Bottlers Phils Inc. -Cebu Plant, G.R. No. 198783, April 15, 2013 51. The National Wages & Productivity Commission et al., vs. The Alliance of Progressive Labor et al., GR No. 150326, March 12, 2014 52. Rajah Humabon Hotel vs. Trajano, 226 SCRA 332 53. Guico vs. Sec of Labor, G.R. No. 131750, November 16, 1998 54. Ex-Bataan Vetrerans Security Agency vs.. Sec. Of Labor, et al., G.R. No. 152396, November 20, 2007, citing Cireneo Bowling Plaza vs. Sensing, G.R. No. 146572, Jan. 14, 2005 55. Sapio vs. Undaloc Construction et al., G.R. No. 155034, May 22, 2008 56. Hon. Secretary of Labor vs. Panay Veterans Security and Investigation Agency, G.R. No. 167708, August 22, 2008 57. National Mines and Allied Workers Union vs. Marcopper Mining Corp., G.R. No. 174641, Nov. 11, 2008 58. Jethro Intelligence & Security Corp., vs. SOLE, et al., GR No. 172537, Aug. 14, 2009 59. Phil Hoteliers Inc., et al., vs. National Union of Workers in Hotel, Restaurant and Allied Industries-Dusit Hotel Nikko Chpater, GR No. 181972, Aug. 25, 2009 60. Tiger Construction and Development Corp vs. Abay et al., GR No. 164141, Feb. 26, 2010 61. People’s Broadcasting (Bombo Radyo Phils) vs. Sec. of DOLE et al., GR No. 179652, March 6, 2012 Resolution on the main Decision of May 8, 2009 62. Superior Packaging Corp., vs. Balagsay et al., G.R. No. 178909, October 10, 2012 63. GAA vs. CA, 140 SCRA 304 64. Nestle Phils., vs. NLRC, 193 SCRA 504 65. Five J Taxi vs. NLRC, 235 SCRA 556 66. Phil. Veterans Bank vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 130439, Oct. 26, 1999 67. Phil Appliances Corp., vs. CA, G.R. No. 149434, June 3, 2004 University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Labor Standards 3 68. Agabon vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 158693, Nov. 17, 2004 69. American Wire & Cable Daily Rated Employees vs. American Wire, G.R. No. 155059, April 29, 2005 70. Honda Phils., vs. Samahang Malayang Manggagawa sa Honda, G.R. No. 145561, June 15, 2005 71. Producers Bank vs. NLRC, 355 SCRA 506 72. Jardin vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 119268, February 23,2000 73. Manila Jockey’s Club Employees Labor Union vs. Manila Jockey Club, G.R. No. 167601, March 7, 2007 74. San Miguel Corp et al., vs. Layoc, Jr., et al., G.R. No. 149640, October 19, 2007 75. San Miguel Corp., vs. Pontillas, G.R. No. 155178, May 7, 2008 76. Arco Metal Products Co., Inc., et al., vs. Samahan ng Mga Manggagawa sa Arco Metal- NAFLU, G.R. No. 170734, May 14, 2008, citing Davao Fruits vs. Asso. Labor Union, 225 SCRA 562 and Sevilla Trading vs. AVA Tomas Services, G.R. No. 152456, April 28, 2004 77. Aguanza vs. Asian Terminal Inc., et al., GR No. 163505, Aug. 14, 2009 78. Genesis Transport Service Inc et al., vs. Unyon ng Malayang Manggagawa ng Genesis Transport et al., GR No. 182114, April 5, 2010 79. Central Azucarera De Tarlac vs. Central Azucarera De Tarlac Labor Union-NLU, GR No. 188949, July 26, 2010 80. SHS Perforated Materials, Inc. et al., vs. Diaz, GR No. 185814, Oct. 13, 2010 81. Nina Jewelry Manufacturing of Metal Arts Inc. vs. Montecillo, G.R. No. 188169, November 28, 2011 82. Locsin II vs. Mekeni Food Corp., GR No. 192105, December 9, 2013 83. TH Shopfitters Corp., et al., vs. T&H Shopfitters Corp., Union, GR No. 191714, Feb 26, 2014 84. Wesleyan University-Phils., vs. Wesleyan University-Phils., Faculty & Staff Asso., GR No. 181806, March 12, 2014 85. Bluer Than Blue Joint Ventures Co., vs. Esteban, GR No. 192582, April 7, 2014, citing2011 Nina Jewelry Manufacturing of Metal Arts Inc. vs. Montecillo University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Labor Standards 4 86. Congson vs. NLRC, 243 SCRA 260 [1995] 87. North Davao Mining vs. NLRC, 254 SCRA 721 [1996] 88. National Federation of Labor vs. CA, G.R. No. 149464, Oct. 19, 2004 89. Heirs of Sara Lee vs. Rey, G.R. No. 149013, Aug. 31, 2006 90. San Juan De Dios Hospital vs. NLRC, 282 SCRA 316 [1997] 91. Simedarby vs. NLRC, 289 SCRA 86 [1998] 92. Phil. Airlines vs. NLRC, 302 SCRA 582 [1999] 93. Linton Commercial Co., Inc., vs. Hellera et al., G.R. No. 163147, October 10, 2007 94. Bisig Manggagawa sa Tryco vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 151309, Oct. 15, 2008 95. Union of Filipro Employees vs. Vicar, 205 SCRA 203 [1992] 96. National Sugar Refinery Corp., vs. NLRC, 220 SCRA 452 [1993] 97. Salazar vs. NLRC, 256 SCRA 273 [1996] 98. Labor Congress of the Phils., vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 1239381, May 21, 1998 99. Mercidar Fishing Corp., vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 112574, October 8, 1998 100. San Miguel Corp., vs. CA, G.R. No. 146775, Jan. 30, 2002 101. Tan vs. Lagrama, G.R. No. 151228, August 15, 2002 102. Lambo vs. NLRC, 317 SCRA 420 103. R&E Transport vs. Latag, G.R. No. 155214, Feb. 13, 2004 104. Asian Transmission vs. CA, 425 SCRA 478 [2004] 105. Autobus Transport System vs. Bautista, G.R. No. 156364, May 16, 2005 106. San Miguel Corp., vs. Del Rosario, G.R. No. 168194, Dec. 13, 2005 107. Penaranda vs. Baganga Plywood Corp., G.R. No. 159577, May 3, 2006 108. Leyte IV Electric Cooperative Inc vs. LEYECO IV Employees Union-ALU, G.R. No. 1577745, October 19, 2007, citing Wellington Investment vs. Trajano, 245 SCRA 561 [1995], and Odango vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 147420, June 10, 2004 University of San Carlos – School of Law and Governance | Labor Standards 5 109. Bahia Shipping Services vs. Chua, G.R. No. 162195, April 8, 2008, citing Cagampan vs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • L\,Epubltc of Tbe ,Jlbtltpptne~ ~Upreme Qcourt Jlllanila
    l\,epubltc of tbe ,Jlbtltpptne~ ~upreme qcourt Jlllanila EN BANC SOCIAL JUSTICE SOCIETY (SJS) G.R. No. 187836 OF~ICERS, NAMELY, SAMSON S. ALCANTARA, and VLADIMIR ALARIQUE T. CABIGAO, Petitioners, -versus- ALFREDO S. LIM, in his capacity as mayor of the City of Manila, Respondent. :x---------------------------------------------:x JOSE L. ATIENZA, JR., G.R. No. 187916 BIENVINIDO M. ABANTE, MA. LOURDES M. ISIP-GARCIA, Present: RAFAEL P. BORROMEO JOCELYN DAWIS-ASUNCION, SERENO, C.J., minors MARIAN REGINA B. CARPIO, TARAN, MACAILA RICCI B. VELASCO, JR., TARAN, RICHARD KENNETH B. LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, TARAN, represented and joined by BRION,* their parents RICHARD AND PERALTA, MARITES TARAN, minors BERSAMIN, CZARINA ALYSANDRA C. DEL CASTILLO, RAMOS, CEZARAH ADRIANNA VILLARAMA, JR., C. RAMOS, and CRISTEN AIDAN PEREZ, C. RAMOS represented and joined MENDOZA, by their mother DONNA C. REYES, ·RAMOS, minors JAZMIN PERLAS-BERNABE, SYLLITA T. VILA AND LEONEN, and ANTONIO T. CRUZ IV, JARDELEZA JJ. represented and joined by their mother MAUREEN C. TOLENTINO, Petitioners, ~ Decision 2 G.R. Nos. 187836 & 187916 -versus- MAYOR ALFREDO S. LIM, VICE MAYOR FRANCISCO DOMAGOSO, . COUNCILORS .ARLENE W. KOA, MOISES T. LIM, JESUS FAJARDO LOUISITO N. CHUA, VICTORIANO A. MELENDEZ, JOHN MARVIN C. NIETO, ROLANDO M. VALERIANO, RAYMUNDO R. YUPANGCO, EDWARD VP MACEDA, RODERICK D. VALBUENA, JOSEFINA M. SISCAR, SALVADOR PHILLIP H. LACUNA, LUCIANO M. VELOSO, CARLO V. LOPEZ, ERNESTO F. RIVERA,1 DANILO VICTOR H. LACUNA, JR., ERNESTO G. ISIP, HONEY H. LACUNA-PANGAN, ERNESTO ·M. DIONISO, JR. and ERICK IAN 0. NIEVA, Respondents. x----------------------------------------x CHEVRON PHILIPPINES INC., Promulgated: PETRON CORPORATION AND PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM NOVEMBER 25, 2014 .
    [Show full text]
  • Final Statement Shell Pandacan 14 July 2009
    Final statement of the Dutch NCP on the “Complaint (dated 15 May 2006) on the violations of Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corporation (PSPC), pursuant to the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises” July 14, 2009 Contents Issues of the complaint ...................................................................................................... 2 Admissibility of the Complaint ............................................................................................ 3 Summary of facts............................................................................................................... 4 Evaluation of the complaint ................................................................................................ 7 I. Manipulations of local government .............................................................................. 7 II. Concealment of negotiations with government and environmental/health risks of activities ......................................................................................................................... 9 III. Lack of specific plans to mitigate the hazards at the oil depot. .................................10 Trucking ...........................................................................................................................13 Relocation ........................................................................................................................13 Information Sharing ..........................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the House of Representatives
    Journal of the House of Representatives SIXTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND REGULAR SESSION 2014 – 2015 JOURNAL NO. 13 Wednesday, September 3, 2014 Prepared by the JOURNAL SERVICE Plenary Affairs Bureau JOURNAL NO. 13 Wednesday, September 3, 2014 CALL TO ORDER CHURCH (TAONG PUTIK DAMBANA NI SAN JUAN BAUTISTA) IN BARANGAY At 4:00 p.m., Deputy Speaker Carlos M. Padilla BIBICLAT, MUNICIPALITY OF ALIAGA, called the session to order. PROVINCE OF NUEVA ECIJA AS A PIL- GRIMAGE SITE AND TOURIST DESTI- NATIONAL ANTHEM AND PRAYER NATION, PROVIDING FOR ITS DEVEL- OPMENT AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS Pursuant to Section 72, Rule XI of the Provisional THEREFOR” Rules of the House, the Members sang the National Anthem and thereafter, observed a minute of silent By Representative Suansing prayer. TO THE COMMITTEE ON TOURISM SUSPENSION OF SESSION House Bill No. 4928, entitled: Thereupon, the Chair suspended the session at 4:02 p.m., upon motion of Representative Mar-Len “AN ACT REQUIRING SUPERMARKETS, Abigail S. Binay. MEAT SHOPS AND PUBLIC AND PRI- VATE MARKETS IN METROPOLITAN RESUMPTION OF SESSION AND URBAN AREAS AND SUCH AREAS WITH SIGNIFICANT MUSLIM POPULA- The session resumed at 4:12 p.m. TION IN THE ENTIRE COUNTRY, TO SEGREGATE NON-PORK MEAT PROD- DEFERMENT OF THE ROLL CALL UCTS FROM PORK PRODUCTS AND ITS DERIVATIVES OR ANY PRODUCT CON- On motion of Rep. Binay, there being no objec- TAINING PORK OR ANY OF ITS DERIVA- tion, the Body deferred the calling of the Roll. TIVES” APPROVAL OF THE JOURNAL By Representative Dimaporo (I.) On a subsequent motion of Rep. Binay, there be- TO THE COMMITTEE ON TRADE AND IN- ing no objection, the Body approved Journal No.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Dutch Shell and Its Sustainability Troubles
    Royal Dutch Shell and its sustainability troubles Background report to the Erratum of Shell's Annual Report 2010 Albert ten Kate May 2011 1 Colophon Title: Royal Dutch Shell and its sustainability troubles Background report to the Erratum of Shell's Annual Report 2010 May 2011. This report is made on behalf of Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth Netherlands) Author: Albert ten Kate, free-lance researcher corporate social responsibility Pesthuislaan 61 1054 RH Amsterdam phone: (+31)(0)20 489 29 88 mobile: (+31)(0)6 185 68 354 e-mail: [email protected] 2 Contents Introduction 4 Methodology 5 Cases: 1. Muddling through in Nigeria 6 1a) oil spills 1b) primitive gas flaring 1c) conflict and corruption 2. Denial of Brazilian pesticide diseases 14 3. Mining the Canadian tar sands 17 4. The bitter taste of Brazil's sugarcane 20 4a) sourcing sugarcane from occupiers of indigenous land 4b) bad labour conditions sugarcane harvesters 4c) massive monoculture land use 5. Fracking unconventional gas 29 6. Climate change, a business case? 35 7. Interfering with politics 38 8. Drilling plans Alaska’s Arctic Ocean 42 9. Sakhalin: the last 130 Western Gray Whales 45 10. The risky Kashagan oil field 47 11. A toxic legacy in Curaçao 49 12. Philippines: an oil depot amidst a crowd of people 52 3 Introduction Measured in revenue, Royal Dutch Shell is one of the biggest companies in the world. According to its annual report of 2010, its revenue amounted to USD 368 billion in 2010. Shell produces oil and gas in 30 countries, spread over the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Producing Rizal: Negotiating Modernity Among the Filipino Diaspora in Hawaii
    PRODUCING RIZAL: NEGOTIATING MODERNITY AMONG THE FILIPINO DIASPORA IN HAWAII A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN ASIAN STUDIES AUGUST 2014 By Ai En Isabel Chew Thesis Committee: Patricio Abinales, Chairperson Cathryn Clayton Vina Lanzona Keywords: Filipino Diaspora, Hawaii, Jose Rizal, Modernity, Rizalista Sects, Knights of Rizal 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………..…5 Chapter 1 Introduction: Rizal as a Site of Contestation………………………………………………………………………………………....6 Methodology ..................................................................................................................18 Rizal in the Filipino Academic Discourse......................................................................21 Chapter 2 Producing Rizal: Interactions on the Trans-Pacific Stage during the American Colonial Era,1898-1943…………………………..………………………………………………………...29 Rizal and the Philippine Revolution...............................................................................33 ‘Official’ Productions of Rizal under American Colonial Rule .....................................39 Rizal the Educated Cosmopolitan ..................................................................................47 Rizal as the Brown Messiah ...........................................................................................56 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................66
    [Show full text]
  • Philippine Assemblies of God Organized
    [AJPS 8:2 (2005), pp. 271-287] THE ORGANIZATION OF THE PHILIPPINE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD AND THE ROLE OF EARLY MISSIONARIES1 Trinidad E. Seleky 1. Philippine District Council of the Assemblies of God Filipinos, who graduated from Assemblies of God Bible Schools in the United States and went back to their country to preach to their own people,2 wanted an Assemblies of God (USA) appointed missionary to help them become organized. Their reason for this action was that the Philippines, at that time, was still under the protectorate of the United States, with a Counsel General as the final seat of authority. A requirement for permitting any outside church denomination to operate in the Philippines was that it must seek registration with the United States Counsel General and have a duly appointed missionary or church leader from the home body in the United States. 1.1 Leland E. Johnson Leland E. Johnson, with his wife and two children, landed in Manila on Christmas Eve, 1939, and spent an uneventful Christmas Sunday in a hotel. He brought with him a letter from Springfield to be presented to the Vice-Counsel, Cordell Hull, who in turn would present it to the Counsel General. The letter requested permission to register an 1 This article is taken from Trinidad Cabanilla Esperanza, “The Assemblies of God in the Philippines” (Master of Religious Education thesis, Fuller Theological Seminary, 1965). Only in a limited extent, editorial changes were applied: subheadings were added with several explanatory footnotes, and the Journal style has been applied. 2 See Trinidad Seleky, “Six Filipinos and One American: Pioneers of the Assemblies of God in the Philippines,” Asian Journal of Pentecostal Studies 4:1 (2001), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • CHR 2015 Annual Accomplishment Report
    2015 Accomplishment Report COMMISSION ON 3333 HUMAN RIGHTS 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENT REPORT 2015 Accomplishment Report TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION SERVICES 1 DOCUMENTATION OF COMPLAINTS 1 Complaints Evaluated for Investigation 2 Gender-Based Violations 11 Violations of Children’s Rights 12 Business and Human Rights 15 Violations of Indigenous Peoples’ Rights 18 Internal Displacement of Peoples and Communities 20 Disposition of Cases 21 Persons Assisted 22 Monitoring of Jails/ Detention Centers 22 Financial Assistance 23 Forensic Services 24 Issuance of Human Rights Clearance/ Certification 24 HUMAN RIGHTS PROMOTION SERVICES 26 EDUCATION AND TRAINING ACTIVITIES 26 Human Rights IEC Materials 28 Training Modules Developed 31 Training Kits 32 HR Milestone Events and Celebratory Events 32 HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY SERVICES 35 Human Rights Advisories 35 Human Rights Position Papers 38 Human Rights Mechanisms/ Measures 39 Human Rights Treaty/ Situation Report 40 On-going Policy Development Initiatives 41 INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION PROJECTS 45 United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) 45 AECID Fortaleza 46 The Asia Pacific Forum (APF) 51 INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING 54 Internal Policies 55 International Engagements 55 Internal Capacity Building Programs 58 Manpower Complement 59 General Appropriations 59 2015 Accomplishment Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In monitoring the human rights situation in 2015, the Commission received a total of 6,448 requests for protection services of different types of human rights violations. Based on the preliminary evaluation of 6,448 complaints, only 1,413 required full blown investigation, while majority or 4,971 needed legal aide and counseling services. Some 29 complaints were found to be outside of the CHR jurisdiction, which were immediately referred to other agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Contested Space: Manila Sunset Bay and the Conflict Over Land Reclamation for an Urban Transformation Project
    Journal of Studies in Social Sciences ISSN 2201-4624 Volume 13, Number 1, 2015, 75-98 Contested Space: Manila Sunset Bay and the Conflict Over Land Reclamation for an Urban Transformation Project Seth Asare Okyere1, Gifty Adom-Asamoah2, Karenina Guevara Aramburu3, Don Johnson Lontoc4 1Division of Global Architecture, Osaka University, Suita Osaka, 562-0871, Japan 2Department of Planning, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana 3Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 20133, Milan, Italy 4GHD Architects, Philippines, 2258 Chino Roces Avenue cor EDSA, 1229 Makati City Philippines Corresponding author: Seth Asare Okyere, Division of Global Architecture, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan ([email protected]) Abstract: Urban spaces are becoming contested spaces, where different groups and institutions, political or apolitical, legitimize their right to use, maintain and appropriate space for various purposes, eventually leading to conflicts and contestations. The Manila Bay area has been at the center of reclamation efforts and opposition against such efforts over a long period. Through observation, interviews and documentary sources, this paper provides a narrative on a developing conflict between local citizen groups, city authority and real estate organizations. The first section of the paper provides a background on the Manila Bay cultural value and the proposed solar city reclamation project. Secondly, the paper highlights an evolution of the conflict through a network analysis. The final section of the paper outlines decisional strategies for conflict transformation by focusing on patterns of interaction and the network among the different actors. Keywords: Manila bay, urban transformation, land reclamation, local conflict, protest, networks analysis © Copyright 2015 the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • MEMORANDUM for DMCI PROJECT DEVELOPERS, INC. to Love One’S City, and Have a Part in Its Advancement and Improvement, Is the Highest Privilege and Duty of a Citizen
    REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES SUPREME COURT MANILA En Banc G.R. No. 213948 KNIGHTS OF RIZAL Petitioner - versus - DMCI HOMES, INC. ET AL. Respondents MEMORANDUM FOR DMCI PROJECT DEVELOPERS, INC. To love one’s city, and have a part in its advancement and improvement, is the highest privilege and duty of a citizen. – Daniel H. Burnham, architect and master planner of Manila REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES SUPREME COURT MANILA En Banc KNIGHTS OF RIZAL, Petitioner, - versus - G.R. No. 213948 DMCI HOMES, INC. ET AL., Respondents. MEMORANDUM Private respondent DMCI Project Developers, Inc. (“DMCI-PDI”), by counsel, respectfully states: Prefatory In December 1913, the Jose Rizal National Monument (“Rizal Monument”) was erected on the Luneta as a tomb and a memorial to Jose Rizal. Since its creation in 1907 as the model entitled Motto Stella up to the present, more than a century hence, it has been mired in controversy. The stat- ue of Rizal was criticized as a poor depiction of the national hero, dressed like a European in an ill-fitting overcoat, while the monument itself, according to the Official Gazette web- site, “shies away from magnificence. It does not tower, there are no ornate details, no grandiose aesthetic claims.”1 For decades after its installation until 1961, it stood alone in an empty field. Then the Knights of Rizal, petitioner in this case (“petitioner”), successfully lobbied for the building of a Rizal Memorial Cultural Center at the back of the monument, which was never built. But a towering steel shaft that reached more than 30 meters was installed on the monument, until it was removed two years later after widespread censure.
    [Show full text]
  • 30 October 2012 the PANDACAN OIL DEPOT and the NEED FOR
    30 October 2012 THE PANDACAN OIL DEPOT AND THE NEED FOR POLICY STABILITY We, the undersigned business groups, express our deepest concern regarding Ordinance 8283 of the Manila City Council, which reclassifies the land where the Pandacan oil depot currently stands from heavy industrial to high intensity commercial/mixed use, effectively removing the said facility from the area. We note that apprehensions over the security of the facility and the safety of the surrounding residential community are at the forefront of the decade-long debate over the Pandacan oil depot. With regard to this, we would like to categorically state that it is both an interest and a duty of the business sector to ensure and promote the people’s right to a safe environment, good health, and a balanced ecology. While our primary role is to create economic wealth, we also give the highest regard to the responsible and sustainable conduct of our businesses. In this light, the companies affected by the said Manila ordinance implemented measures to adequately address such safety concerns, from reconfiguration in the layout of the depot’s facilities to increased security safeguards jointly undertaken with local law enforcement and emergency response units. However, we foresee the emergence of a new set of concerns should the relocation of the Pandacan oil depot outside Metro Manila push through. We will have to contend with increased risk of road accidents, product spills, and threats to security for the tankers and the public. It will also mean higher logistical costs, which must, in fairness, be passed on to consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • Soldiersinthesun000472mbp.Pdf
    991.4 S51e Keep Your Card in This Pocket Books will be issued only on presentation of proper library cards. labeled books , Unless otherwise, may be retained for two weeks. Borrowers finding books marked, de faced or mutilated are expected to report same at library desk; otherwise the last borrower will be held responsible for all imperfections discovered. The card holder is responsible for all books drawn on this card. Penalty for over-due books 2c a day plus cost of notices. Lost cards and change of residence must be re ported promptly. Public Library Kansas City, Mo. Keep Your Card in This Pocket MKKOWITZ INVKLOPt CO., K, O., MO. J> A MAI MAR 06 1992 EC 1 5 1992 f S 1 , 4 iFEB 2 'uaLic LIBRARY * ** * * * * * % ***?*%***;* m m %** IN THE SUN THE PHIUWNC ISLANDS- Amrlcof ftfdlfrs trocfe Insurgents through nwm 5S3? of pri |^4 Aguinotdo copturad tm\ 21 now ood unarmed Amerlcon soldiers umfer hosf:!0 flrt THE PHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO Soldiers In The Adventure in Imperialism by William Thaddeus Sexton Captain, United States Army The Military Service Publishing Company Harrisburg, Pa. Copyright 1939, by WILLIAM THADDEUS SEXTON ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 5 1 -, PRINTED IN THE U. S. A. BY THE TELEGRAPH PRESS PENNSYLVANIA ''" J';-> To My Daughter, Elaine Sexton Who though only four years of age, loved to sit and watch her daddy "play map." God needed an angel and took her away. Pref ac e Any opinions expressed in this book are entirely those of the author, which have been reached as a result of his own research on this subject and must not be construed as reflecting in any way the thoughts of the Army as a whole or of the War Department in par ticular.
    [Show full text]
  • Shell Overview of Controversial Business Practices in 2008
    Shell Overview of controversial business practices in 2008 Joseph Wilde-Ramsing May 2009 Shell Overview of controversial business practices in 2008 Joseph Wilde-Ramsing Amsterdam, May 2009 1 Shell Overview of controversial business practices in 2008 Colophon Shell Overview of controversial business practices in 2008 May 2009 By: Joseph Wilde-Ramsing Cover Design: Annelies Vlasblom Funding This publication is made possible with co-funding from the Vereniging van Beleggers voor Duurzame Ontwikkeling (VBDO) Published by Stichting Onderzoek Multinationale Ondernemingen Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations Sarphatistraat 30 1018 GL Amsterdam The Netherlands Phone: + 31 (20) 6391291 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.somo.nl This document is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivateWorks 2.5 License. 2 Introduction This company briefing has been prepared by SOMO (Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations). It provides an overview of business practices that could be considered unsustainable or irresponsible and that occurred or have been addressed in 2008. The overview below describes only controversial practices that were identified, not the positive achievements of a company in the same year. Information on a Shell’s positive achievements can be found in its annual and/or sustainability report and on the company’s website. The purpose of this report is to provide additional information to the company’s shareholders and other stakeholders on controversies that may or may not be detected and reported by the company itself. This report does not contain an analysis of Shell’s corporate responsibility policies, operational aspects of corporate responsibility management, implementation systems, reporting and transparency, or total performance on any issue.
    [Show full text]