Acknowledgementscontents
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Trade Mission Booklet
DC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TRADE MISSION TO THE BAHAMAS APRIL 29– MAY 2, 2019 TRADE MISSION PROGRAMME BOOKLET DC Chamber of Commerce 1133 21st Street, NW M 200 Washington, DC 20036 Phone: 202-347-7201 Email: [email protected] Stay Connected! twitter.com/dcchamber Page 34 Page 3 Message from Vincent B. Orange, Sr. President & CEO DC Chamber of Commerce April 29, 2019 Greetings: It is an honor and privilege to lead the District of Columbia Chamber of Commerce Delegation to the Commonwealth of the Bahamas for this historic trade mission. We are extremely delighted to be here in Nassau, Bahamas for four days to explore, learn, invest and develop meaningful business and partnership relations, and to have a little fun as well. Our Chamber was elated to receive the Bahamas Chamber of Commerce and Employers’ Confederation (BCCEC) and the Dignitaries of the Bahamas in the eightieth anniversary year of the DC Chamber of Commerce which was founded on June 20, 1938. As the “Voice of Business” in the Nation’s Capital, Washington, D.C., we stand proud in representing small, medium and large businesses through advocating, connecting and educating while delivering the capital on behalf of our members. The DC Chamber Delegation is here today pursuant to the memorandum of understanding between our Chambers and the pursuit of further strengthening business relations and developing reciprocal cooperation for opportunities to conduct business together. Developing and establishing a practical framework for stronger business engagement and the enhancement of reciprocal economic objectives are our mutual goals. The joint efforts of our Chambers have made our missions rewarding, promising, developing and growing to bear fruit for our members, countries, communities and cultural engagement. -
District of Columbia Board of Elections Candidates - April 1, 2014 Primary Election
District of Columbia Board of Elections Candidates - April 1, 2014 Primary Election DEMOCRATIC Delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives Pick-up Date Candidate's Name Contact Person Candidate's Address Phone Number Date Filed Email Address Eleanor H. Norton Jacqueline Pelt P.O. Box 70626 20024 202-207-8829 11/8/13 12/20/13 [email protected] Mayor of the District of Columbia Pick-up Date Candidate's Name Contact Person Candidate's Address Phone Number Date Filed Email Address Carlos Allen 1715 Kilborne Place, NW 20010 240-678-9846 12/5/13 1/2/14 [email protected] Muriel E. Bowser Muriel Bowser/Bo ShuffP.O. Box 60385 20039 202-832-0403 11/8/13 12/9/13 [email protected] Christian Carter (withdrew 1/27/14) Christian Carter 2509 Branch Ave., SE 20020 202-699-2626 11/8/13 1/2/14 [email protected] Jack Evans Josh Brown 2213 14th Street, NW 20009 202-503-9671 11/8/13 1/2/14 [email protected] Vincent C. Gray Chuck Thies 2619 Branch Ave, SE, 20020 202-957-0873 12/2/13 12/31/13 [email protected] Reta Lewis Larry Decker 1050 Conn. Ave, NW 10th Fl. 20036 202-733-3050 11/8/13 1/2/14 larry@retalewis for mayor.com Vincent Orange 1540 Taylor Street, NE 20017 202-723-0113 11/8/13 12/9/13 [email protected] Andy Shallal 1831 Kalorama Road, NW 20009 202-903-7006 11/8/13 12/9/13 [email protected] Tommy Wells Daniel Conner 317 Pennsylvania Ave., SE 20003 202-656-7053 11/8/13 12/31/13 [email protected] Chairman of the Council Pick-up Date Candidate's Name Contact Person Candidate's Address Phone Number Date Filed Email Address Calvin H. -
International Business Guide
WASHINGTON, DC INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS GUIDE Contents 1 Welcome Letter — Mayor Muriel Bowser 2 Welcome Letter — DC Chamber of Commerce President & CEO Vincent Orange 3 Introduction 5 Why Washington, DC? 6 A Powerful Economy Infographic8 Awards and Recognition 9 Washington, DC — Demographics 11 Washington, DC — Economy 12 Federal Government 12 Retail and Federal Contractors 13 Real Estate and Construction 12 Professional and Business Services 13 Higher Education and Healthcare 12 Technology and Innovation 13 Creative Economy 12 Hospitality and Tourism 15 Washington, DC — An Obvious Choice For International Companies 16 The District — Map 19 Washington, DC — Wards 25 Establishing A Business in Washington, DC 25 Business Registration 27 Office Space 27 Permits and Licenses 27 Business and Professional Services 27 Finding Talent 27 Small Business Services 27 Taxes 27 Employment-related Visas 29 Business Resources 31 Business Incentives and Assistance 32 DC Government by the Letter / Acknowledgements D C C H A M B E R O F C O M M E R C E Dear Investor: Washington, DC, is a thriving global marketplace. With one of the most educated workforces in the country, stable economic growth, established research institutions, and a business-friendly government, it is no surprise the District of Columbia has experienced significant growth and transformation over the past decade. I am excited to present you with the second edition of the Washington, DC International Business Guide. This book highlights specific business justifications for expanding into the nation’s capital and guides foreign companies on how to establish a presence in Washington, DC. In these pages, you will find background on our strongest business sectors, economic indicators, and foreign direct investment trends. -
HR 51: MAKING DC the 51St STATE HEARING
H.R. 51: MAKING D.C. THE 51st STATE HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND REFORM HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 22, 2021 Serial No. 117–10 Printed for the use of the Committee on Oversight and Reform ( Available on: govinfo.gov, oversight.house.gov or docs.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 43–960 PDF WASHINGTON : 2021 COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND REFORM CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York, Chairwoman ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, District of JAMES COMER, Kentucky, Ranking Minority Columbia Member STEPHEN F. LYNCH, Massachusetts JIM JORDAN, Ohio JIM COOPER, Tennessee PAUL A. GOSAR, Arizona GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia VIRGINIA FOXX, North Carolina RAJA KRISHNAMOORTHI, Illinois JODY B. HICE, Georgia JAMIE RASKIN, Maryland GLENN GROTHMAN, Wisconsin RO KHANNA, California MICHAEL CLOUD, Texas KWEISI MFUME, Maryland BOB GIBBS, Ohio ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ, New York CLAY HIGGINS, Louisiana RASHIDA TLAIB, Michigan RALPH NORMAN, South Carolina KATIE PORTER, California PETE SESSIONS, Texas CORI BUSH, Missouri FRED KELLER, Pennsylvania DANNY K. DAVIS, Illinois ANDY BIGGS, Arizona DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Florida ANDREW CLYDE, Georgia PETER WELCH, Vermont NANCY MACE, South Carolina HENRY C. ‘‘HANK’’ JOHNSON, JR., Georgia SCOTT FRANKLIN, Florida JOHN P. SARBANES, Maryland JAKE LATURNER, Kansas JACKIE SPEIER, California PAT FALLON, Texas ROBIN L. KELLY, Illinois YVETTE HERRELL, New Mexico BRENDA L. LAWRENCE, Michigan BYRON DONALDS, Florida MARK DESAULNIER, California JIMMY GOMEZ, California AYANNA PRESSLEY, Massachusetts VACANCY DAVID RAPALLO, Staff Director MARK STEPHENSON, Director of Legislation ELISA LANIER, Chief Clerk CONTACT NUMBER: 202-225-5051 MARK MARIN, Minority Staff Director (II) CONTENTS Page Hearing held on March 22, 2021 ........................................................................... -
Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012
VERIZON POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS JANUARY – DECEMBER 2012 1 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012 A Message from Craig Silliman Verizon is affected by a wide variety of government policies ‐‐ from telecommunications regulation to taxation to health care and more ‐‐ that have an enormous impact on the business climate in which we operate. We owe it to our shareowners, employees and customers to advocate public policies that will enable us to compete fairly and freely in the marketplace. Political contributions are one way we support the democratic electoral process and participate in the policy dialogue. Our employees have established political action committees at the federal level and in 20 states. These political action committees (PACs) allow employees to pool their resources to support candidates for office who generally support the public policies our employees advocate. This report lists all PAC contributions, corporate political contributions, support for ballot initiatives and independent expenditures made by Verizon in 2012. The contribution process is overseen by the Corporate Governance and Policy Committee of our Board of Directors, which receives a comprehensive report and briefing on these activities at least annually. We intend to update this voluntary disclosure twice a year and publish it on our corporate website. We believe this transparency with respect to our political spending is in keeping with our commitment to good corporate governance and a further sign of our responsiveness to the interests of our shareowners. Craig L. Silliman Senior Vice President, Public Policy 2 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012 Political Contributions Policy: Our Voice in the Political Process What are the Verizon Good Government Clubs? and the government agencies administering the federal and individual state election laws. -
COG Board,Committees and Staff 2009 Metropolitan W Ashington
2008 Annual Report 2009COG Board, Metropolitan Committees Washington and Staff Regional Directory METROPOLITANWASHINGTONCOUNCILOFGOVERNMENTSMETROPOLITANWASHINGTONCOUNCILOFGOVERNMENTS Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments 2008 Annual Report Meeting the Region’s Short-Term Needs and Long-Term Goals Metropolitan Washington Member Jurisdictions COG 2009 Metropolitan Washington Regional Directory Council of Governments District of Columbia ..........................16-21 COG Board of Directors ...........................3-5 Maryland...........................................22-45 Board, Committees and Staff Transportation Planning Board (TPB).........6-8 Bladensburg.............................................22 Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Bowie ......................................................23 Committee (MWAQC).............................9-11 College Park .......................................24-25 COG Policy Committees ............................12 Frederick .................................................26 COG Public/Private Partnerships ................13 Frederick County .................................27-29 COG Administrative Staff ...........................14 Gaithersburg.......................................30-31 Greenbelt............................................32-33 Montgomery County ............................34-37 Prince George’s County .......................38-41 Rockville .............................................42-43 Takoma Park.......................................44-45 Virginia..............................................46-69 -
Voting System Failures: a Database Solution
B R E N N A N CENTER FOR JUSTICE voting system failures: a database solution Lawrence Norden Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law about the brennan center for justice The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law is a non-partisan public policy and law institute that focuses on fundamental issues of democracy and justice. Our work ranges from voting rights to campaign finance reform, from racial justice in criminal law to presidential power in the fight against terrorism. A singular institution – part think tank, part public interest law firm, part advocacy group – the Brennan Center combines scholarship, legislative and legal advocacy, and communication to win meaningful, measurable change in the public sector. about the brennan center’s voting rights and elections project The Brennan Center promotes policies that protect rights, equal electoral access, and increased political participation on the national, state and local levels. The Voting Rights and Elections Project works to expend the franchise, to make it as simple as possible for every eligible American to vote, and to ensure that every vote cast is accurately recorded and counted. The Center’s staff provides top-flight legal and policy assistance on a broad range of election administration issues, including voter registration systems, voting technology, voter identification, statewide voter registration list maintenance, and provisional ballots. The Help America Vote Act in 2002 required states to replace antiquated voting machines with new electronic voting systems, but jurisdictions had little guidance on how to evaluate new voting technology. The Center convened four panels of experts, who conducted the first comprehensive analyses of electronic voting systems. -
2014 Year End Report
1 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2014 A Message from Craig Silliman Verizon is affected by a wide variety of government policies ‐‐ from telecommunications regulation to taxation to health care and more ‐‐ that have an enormous impact on the business climate in which we operate. We owe it to our shareowners, employees and customers to advocate public policies that will enable us to compete fairly and freely in the marketplace. Political contributions are one way we support the democratic electoral process and participate in the policy dialogue. Our employees have established political action committees at the federal level and in 18 states. These political action committees (PACs) allow employees to pool their resources to support candidates for office who generally support the public policies our employees advocate. This report lists all PAC contributions, corporate political contributions, support for ballot initiatives and independent expenditures made by Verizon during 2014. The contribution process is overseen by the Corporate Governance and Policy Committee of our Board of Directors, which receives a comprehensive report and briefing on these activities at least annually. We intend to update this voluntary disclosure twice a year and publish it on our corporate website. We believe this transparency with respect to our political spending is in keeping with our commitment to good corporate governance and a further sign of our responsiveness to the interests of our shareowners. Craig L. Silliman Executive Vice President, Public Policy and General Counsel 2 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2014 Political Contributions Policy: Our Voice in the Political Process What are the Verizon Good Government Clubs? contributions process including the setting of The Verizon Good Government Clubs (GGCs) exist to monetary contribution limitations and the help the people of Verizon participate in America’s establishment of periodic reporting requirements. -
Annual Report 2013
Written by Lee Whack, District of Columbia Housing Finance Agency Edited by Allison Ladd, District of Columbia Housing Finance Agency Designed by Todd Bennings, Heavy Creative Photography by Chris Spielmann, Spielmann Studio Printed by Niko Tombros, House of Printing 3 Building Blocks When you hear the phrase “Building Blocks” you think of fundamentals. Without the fundamentals, without the basics, it is hard to build anything. Housing, a safe and decent place to live, is a fundamental that all people need. When you travel through the District of Columbia nowadays you Contents see new blocks of housing being built, and you see old blocks being rebuilt. Cranes seem to be on 04 Our Agency Mission, Services, Introduction, Departments every other street, construction workers busily erecting apartment buildings, and homes that were 10 Messages once boarded are remodeled, then sold, often in Chairman, Interim Executive Director short order. With strong demand for housing in Washington, D.C. many people are left wondering 14 Multifamily Housing about one fundamental question. Will there be any Severna II, Nannie Helen, Bass Circle affordable housing left in the nation’s capital? 21 Single Family Homeownership District of Columbia Housing Finance Agency HomeSaver, DC Open Doors (DCHFA), with the help of our partners, exists to enhance the blocks of the District of Columbia with 24 Finance Report and Audit quality affordable housing. We work to achieve this goal by financing affordable apartment buildings 34 Our Board and Staff and affordable single family homes for those who otherwise would be unable to live in this expensive residential real estate market. -
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the DISTRICT of COLUMBIA D.C. ASSOCIATION of CHARTERED PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Et Al., Plaintiffs
Case 1:14-cv-01293-TSC Document 46 Filed 09/09/16 Page 1 of 78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA D.C. ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED PUBLIC SCHOOLS, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 14-1293 (TSC) v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. DEFENDANTS’ CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Pursuant to the Court’s May 26, 2016 Minute Order, defendants move for summary judgment on all claims in the Complaint [1]. The basis for this Motion is Fed. R. Civ. P. 56, and the grounds are set forth in the accompanying Memorandum of Points and Authorities, which shall also serve as an opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment [43]. A proposed order is attached. Because this Motion is dispositive of the Complaint, defendants have not sought plaintiffs’ consent. See LCvR 7(m). DATED: September 9, 2016. Respectfully Submitted, KARL A. RACINE Attorney General for the District of Columbia ELIZABETH SARAH GERE Deputy Attorney General Public Interest Division /s/ Toni Michelle Jackson TONI MICHELLE JACKSON [453765] Chief, Equity Section /s/ Matthew Robert Blecher Case 1:14-cv-01293-TSC Document 46 Filed 09/09/16 Page 2 of 78 MATTHEW ROBERT BLECHER [1012957] GREGORY M. CUMMING [1018173] Assistant Attorneys General 441 Fourth Street, N.W., Suite 630 South Washington, D.C. 20001 Phone: (202) 442-9774 [email protected] Counsel for Defendants 2 Case 1:14-cv-01293-TSC Document 46 Filed 09/09/16 Page 3 of 78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA D.C. ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED PUBLIC SCHOOLS, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. -
Frequently Asked Questions Mayor Bowser's B21-0357
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS MAYOR BOWSER’S B21-0357 PUBLIC SAFETY AND CRIMINAL CODE REVISIONS ACT OF 2015 WHY DO WE HAVE CONCERNS ABOUT B21-0357? B21-0357 promotes ineffective and counterproductive “tough on crime” approaches to public safety. In response to the recent rise in crime in the District of Columbia, Mayor Muriel Bowser (“Mayor”) proposed B21-0357, the Public Safety and Criminal Code Revisions Amendment Act of 2015. The Mayor’s proposal would employ policies that have proven ineffective and counterproductive in ensuring public safety. Over the past 25 years local politicians have adhered to the conventional wisdom that being “tough on crime” will win elections and appease the public’s appetite for safety. To alleviate public fear and thirst for retribution, our lawmakers have deemed more acts criminal and doled out harsher punishments. Many of these laws have been selectively enforced on the District’s Black community and communities of color and have produced a dramatic rise in incarceration and criminal justice control. Despite dramatic shifts in public opinion, with the public now supporting common sense and fair sentencing, B21-0357 adheres to the tradition of punishment and incarceration. The policies in this proposal will result in more District residents being incarcerated, and drive more people into the cycle of disenfranchisement and other collateral consequences characteristic of our criminal justice system. There are also serious constitutional concerns with some of the provisions contained within the proposal. Oppose B21-0357 and urge the D.C. Council to reject “tough on crime” rhetoric in favor of smart, evidence-supported public policy. -
Advisory Neighborhood Commission 2A “Serving the Foggy Bottom and West End Communities of Washington, D.C.” November 29, 2015
Advisory Neighborhood Commission 2A “Serving the Foggy Bottom and West End communities of Washington, D.C.” November 29, 2015 Councilmember Mary Cheh Chair, Committee on Transportation and the Environment Council of the District of Columbia 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 [email protected] RE: Proposal by the Downtown DC Public Restroom Initiative to install and maintain clean, safe public restrooms in downtown DC Dear Councilmember Cheh, At its regular meeting on November 18, 2015, Advisory Neighborhood Commission 2A (“ANC 2A” or “Commission”) considered the above-referenced matter. With four of seven commissioners present, a quorum at a duly-noticed public meeting, the Commission voted unanimously to adopt the following resolution, which was introduced by Commissioner Zhurbinskiy and seconded by Commissioner Schrefer, by a vote of (4- 0-0): WHEREAS, many individuals need access to clean, safe, available public restrooms, including tourists, families with young children, women who are pregnant, the elderly, individuals with bowel incontinence and people without housing; WHEREAS, a study conducted by the People for Fairness Coalition (PFC) revealed that there are very few public restrooms in downtown Washington, DC, some establishments do not allow people to use restrooms unless they first purchase something, and in most downtown neighborhoods there are no restrooms available late at night or early in the morning; WHEREAS, most capital cities in Europe and Asia have clean, safe public restrooms that are easily accessible at any time of night or day, while this is not the case in our Nation’s Capital; WHEREAS, a number of large cities in the U.S.