DOCSLIB.ORG

Great Basin National Park Aspen Stand Condition and Health Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Great Basin National Park Aspen Stand Condition and Health Assessment Natural Resource Report NPS/GRBA/NRR—2014/782 ON THE COVER Fall colors from Mather Overlook, Great Basin National Park Photograph by: Margaret Horner Great Basin National Park Aspen Stand Condition and Health Assessment Natural Resource Report NPS/GRBA/NRR—2014/782 Margaret A. Horner1, Bryan T. Hamilton1, Louis Provencher2 1National Park Service 100 Great Basin National Park Baker, NV 89311 2The Nature Conservancy 1 East First Street Suite 1007 Reno, NV 89501 March 2014 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received formal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data, and whose background and expertise put them on par technically and scientifically with the authors of the information. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. This report is available from Great Basin National Park, Mojave Desert Network and the Natural Resource Publications Management website (http://www.nature.nps.gov/publications/nrpm/). To receive this report in a format optimized for screen readers, please email [email protected]. Please cite this publication as: Horner, M. A., B. T. Hamilton, and L. Provencher. 2014. Great Basin National Park aspen stand condition and health assessment. Natural Resource Report NPS/GRBA/NRR—2014/782. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. ii Contents Page Figures........................................................................................................................................... vii Figures (continued) ...................................................................................................................... viii Tables ............................................................................................................................................. ix Appendices ..................................................................................................................................... ix Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... xi Acknowledgments......................................................................................................................... xii List of Terms ................................................................................................................................. xii Acronyms ..................................................................................................................................... xiv Background and Need ..................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose .................................................................................................................................... 3 Project Area ............................................................................................................................. 3 Methods........................................................................................................................................... 5 Aspen Stand Condition and Health Assessment ...................................................................... 6 Results ............................................................................................................................................. 7 Aspen Biophysical Settings ................................................................................................... 14 Stable Aspen ..................................................................................................................... 14 Seral Aspen ....................................................................................................................... 16 Seral Subalpine Aspen ...................................................................................................... 18 Aspen Stand Condition and Health Assessment ........................................................................... 21 Watershed Assessments ......................................................................................................... 23 Baker Creek ...................................................................................................................... 23 Snake Creek ...................................................................................................................... 24 Strawberry Creek .............................................................................................................. 25 iii Contents (continued) Page Lehman Creek ................................................................................................................... 26 North Fork of Big Wash ................................................................................................... 27 South Fork Big Wash ........................................................................................................ 28 Shingle Creek .................................................................................................................... 29 Can Young Canyon ........................................................................................................... 30 Pine and Ridge Creek........................................................................................................ 31 Hub Basin.......................................................................................................................... 32 Lexington Canyon ............................................................................................................. 33 Williams Creek ................................................................................................................. 34 Dry Canyon ....................................................................................................................... 35 Young Canyon .................................................................................................................. 36 Mill Creek ......................................................................................................................... 37 Decathon Canyon .............................................................................................................. 38 Big Springs Wash ............................................................................................................. 39 Burnt Mill Creek ............................................................................................................... 40 Lincoln Canyon ................................................................................................................. 41 Management Recommendations ................................................................................................... 43 Aspen Treatment Objectives and Methods ............................................................................ 44 Hand Felling...................................................................................................................... 45 Prescribed Fire and Pile Burning ...................................................................................... 46 Wildland Fire Use ............................................................................................................. 46 Current Fire Management Plan ......................................................................................... 48 Effectiveness and Validation Monitoring ......................................................................... 48 iv Contents (continued) Page Recommended Treatment Areas ............................................................................................ 49 Baker Creek ...................................................................................................................... 51 Strawberry Creek .............................................................................................................. 52 Lehman Creek ................................................................................................................... 53 Snake Creek
Recommended publications
  • Description and Correlation of Geologic Units, Cross

    Description and Correlation of Geologic Units, Cross

    Plate 2 UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Utah Geological Survey Bulletin 135 a division of Hydrogeologic Studies and Groundwater Monitoring in Snake Valley and Utah Department of Natural Resources Adjacent Hydrographic Areas, West-Central Utah and East-Central Nevada DESCRIPTION OF GEOLOGIC UNITS SOURCES USED FOR MAP COMPILATION UNIT CORRELATION AND UNIT CORRELATION HYDROGEOLOGIC Alluvial deposits – Sand, silt, clay and gravel; variable thickness; Holocene. Qal MDs Lower Mississippian and Upper Devonian sedimentary rocks, undivided – Best, M.G., Toth, M.I., Kowallis, B.J., Willis, J.B., and Best, V.C., 1989, GEOLOGIC UNITS UNITS Shale; consists primarily of the Pilot Shale; thickness about 850 feet in Geologic map of the Northern White Rock Mountains-Hamlin Valley area, Confining Playa deposits – Silt, clay, and evaporites; deposited along the floor of active Utah, 300–400 feet in Nevada. Aquifers Qp Beaver County, Utah, and Lincoln County, Nevada: U.S. Geological Survey Units playa systems; variable thickness; Pleistocene through Holocene. Map I-1881, 1 pl., scale 1:50,000. D Devonian sedimentary rocks, undivided – Limestone, dolomite, shale, and Holocene Qal Qsm Qp Qea Qafy Spring and wetland related deposits – Clay, silt, and sand; variable thickness; sandstone; includes the Guilmette Formation, Simonson and Sevy Fritz, W.H., 1968, Geologic map and sections of the southern Cherry Creek and Qsm Quaternary Holocene. Dolomite, and portions of the Pilot Shale in Utah; thickness about 4400– northern Egan Ranges, White Pine County, Nevada: Nevada Bureau of QTcs 4700 feet in Utah, 2100–4350 feet in Nevada. Mines Map 35, scale 1:62,500. Pleistocene Qls Qlm Qlg Qgt Qafo QTs QTfs Qea Eolian deposits – Sand and silt; deposited along valley floor margins, includes Hintze, L.H., 1963, Geologic map of Utah southwest quarter, Utah Sate Land active and vegetated dunes; variable thickness; Pleistocene through S Silurian sedimentary rocks, undivided – Dolomite; consists primarily of the Board, scale 1:250,000.
  • AND SCHELL CREEK DIVISIONS of the James O. Klemmedson

    AND SCHELL CREEK DIVISIONS of the James O. Klemmedson

    An Inventory of Bristlecone Pine in the Snake, Mount Moriah, Ward Mountain, and Schell Creek Divisions of the Humboldt National Forest Authors Klemmedson, James O.; Beasley, R. Scott Publisher Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Rights Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. The University of Arizona. Download date 02/10/2021 17:39:02 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/302516 Report AN INVENTORY OF BRISTLECONE PINE IN THE SNAKE, MOUNT MORIAH, WARD MOUNTAIN, AND SCHELL CREEK DIVISIONS OF THE HUMBOLDT NATIONAL FOREST Prepared by James O. Klemmedson and R. Scott Beasley* Submitted to REGIONAL FORESTER, U.S. FOREST SERVICE OGDEN, UTAH in accordance with a COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT between the FOREST SERVICE and LABORATORY OF TREE-RING RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA for A JOINT INVENTORY AND DENDROCHRONOLOGICAL STUDY OF BRISTLECONE PINE * Department of Watershed Management, University of Arizona INTRODUCTION Bristlecone pine, Pinus aristata Engeim., is a species which inhabits high altitudes of the mountainous southwestern United States. It occurs from the Front Range of Colorado through Utah, northern New Mexico and Arizona to the White Mountains of California along the Nevada border in the west. Bristlecone pine commonly occurs in small open groves on arid slopes, but it also grows in association with limber and ponderosa pines, white fir, Douglas - fir, and Engelmann spruce, generally above the 8000 -foot level. This tree has little economic value as a timber species, but does provide a protective and beautifying cover to the landscape. A newly -acquired interst in bristlecone pine stems from the discovery that these trees reach tremendous ages.
  • Mineral Resources of the Marble Canyon Wilderness Study Area, White Pine County, Nevada, and Millard County, Utah

    Mineral Resources of the Marble Canyon Wilderness Study Area, White Pine County, Nevada, and Millard County, Utah

    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) Depository) 1990 Mineral Resources of the Marble Canyon Wilderness Study Area, White Pine County, Nevada, and Millard County, Utah United States Geological Survey Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/govdocs Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Recommended Citation United States Geological Survey, "Mineral Resources of the Marble Canyon Wilderness Study Area, White Pine County, Nevada, and Millard County, Utah" (1990). All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository). Paper 221. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/govdocs/221 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS u.s. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Bureau of Land Ma:l8gement Wilderness Study Area The Fe<!=! Land Policy and Management Act (Publio Law 94-579, October 21, 1976) requires MINERAL RESOURCES OF THE MARBLE CANYON the U.S. Geological Survey and U.S. Bureau of Mines to conduct mineral surveys on ccnain WlLDERNEf,s STUDY AREA, WHITE PINE COUNTY, NEVADA, AND MILLARD COUNTY, UTAH areas to determine !he rninerrJ values. if any, that may be prcsenL Results must be made By availabl. to the public and be submincd to the President and the Congress. This report presents Michael F. Digglesl• Gary A.
  • United States Geological Survey Map Mf-1Z44-B Pamphlet

    United States Geological Survey Map Mf-1Z44-B Pamphlet

    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MISCELLANEOUS FIELD STUDIES UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MAP MF-1Z44-B PAMPHLET MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL OF THE MOUNT MORIAH ROADLESS AREA, WHITE PINE COUNTY, NEVADA By Robert R. Carbon and Ronny A. Martin, U.S. Geological Survey, and Robert H. Wood, H, U.S. Bureau of Mines STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Under the provisions of the Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, September 3, 1964) and related acts, the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines have been conducting mineral surveys of wilderness and primitive areas. Areas officially designated as "wilderness," "wild," or "canoe" when the act was passed were incorporated into the National Wilderness Preservation System, and some of them are presently being studied. The act provided that areas under consideration for wilderness designation should be studied for suitability for incorporation into the Wilderness System. The mineral surveys constitute one aspect of the suitability studies. The act directs that the results of such surveys are to be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress. This report discusses the results of a mineral survey of the Mount Moriah Roadless Area (04352), Humboldt National Forest, White Pine County, Nevada. The Mount Moriah Roadless Area was classified as a further planning area during the Second Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE n) by the U.S. Forest Service, January 1979. MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL SUMMARY STATEMENT The U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines made a geologic, geochemical, and mineral survey of the Mount Moriah Roadless Area, east-central Nevada in 1979-81.

  • Highway 50 Visitors Guide the Loneliest Road in America

    Highway 50 Visitors Guide The Loneliest Road in America Visitors experience Nevada’s unique Basin and Range geography as they travel the Loneliest Road in America - Highway 50 Welcome to Highway 50, the Loneliest Road in America. This highway crosses Central Nevada through the Great Basin, a unique area because no water leaves the basin. Rivers begin, run, and go underground. They may resurface once in awhile but soon return underground. The route Highway 50 follows has been a pathway for travel for centuries. The Native Americans followed migrating herds of deer, antelope, and other game across Central Nevada. Early explorers crossing Nevada included John Fremont and Jedediah Smith. The Overland Stage later followed Smith’s route; then the Pony Express took this route, and finally, the transcontinental telegraph came over this area. On July 1, 1913, the Lincoln Highway Association was organized at Detroit, Michigan with the objective: “To procure the establish- ment of a continuous improved highway from the Atlantic to the Pacific, open to lawful traffic of all descrip- tions without toll charges and to be a lasting memorial to Abraham Lincoln.” (Lincoln Highway Association brochure) The Lincoln Highway was the first coast-to-coast highway, running from New York City to San Francisco. Dwight Eisenhower backed the idea as a young lieutenant colonel in the Army trying to move troops across the country. When he became President of the United States, he promoted the Interstate high- way system. Today, highways take travelers across the country in comfort. Reading journal accounts of pioneers cross- ing Nevada to get to the west coast, one can really appreciate travel conditions today.

  • Highway 93 Visitors Guide Great Basin Highway

    Highway 93 Visitors Guide Great Basin Highway Visitors Discover U.S. Highway 93; Eastern Route Offers Unique Shopping, Outdoor Art, Recreation and More Driving this North-South route through eastern Nevada, visitors discover a treasure trove of shopping, entertainment and recreational opportunities along the way. From the North, Nevada travelers first experience eastern Nevada via the small border town of Jackpot. Originally built as a gaming spot on the Idaho - Nevada border, Jackpot today features several large casinos with big name en- tertainment via lounge and dinner theater shows; hotels with cool swimming pools, gift shops and great restaurants. For those coming into Nevada from the East, Wendover on Alt. U.S. 93-A offers desert drivers their first taste of Ne- vada’s big name entertainment in its large, multipurpose casinos (which often host gaming tournaments) and gourmet dining at affordable prices. Once past the border towns of Jackpot and Wendover, travelers will enjoy the town of Ely, located on the crossroads of U.S. Highway 93, U.S. 50 and U.S. 6. For those driving south from Jackpot, the first stop is Wells where travelers enjoy visiting a trail museum and discovering the town’s old railroad section with newly painted murals. Traveling to Ely from Wendover, small stops along the way in- clude Lages, Fort Schellbourne (once a station for the Pony Express), and then McGill where visitors can stop at the old mining company town’s drugstore muse- um, antique shop and swimming hole. Whether arriving from the North or East, the U.S. Hwy.
  • Aeromagnetic Map of the Mt. Moriah Roadless Area

    Aeromagnetic Map of the Mt. Moriah Roadless Area

    MISCELLANEOUS FIELD STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MAP MF-1244-C U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS topographic ridge extending north from anomaly ·A--does not affect the aeromagnetic pattern; aeromagn,etic Lower plate Upp!!r plate intensities increase over decreasing topographic Tertiary or Cretaceous elevations on the west side of the ridgeline where Gill surface rocks are part of the upper plate. The minus \ Pzus j Pennian through Ordovician} . PALEOZOIC - 400 - gamma magnetic contour interval to the north, !Cam brian anomaly B, is generally over metasedimentary rock and crosses topographic elevations ranging from about 11,000 ft to less than 8,000 ft . Abandoned mine DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS workings in the metasedimentary terrane near lat 39°20' N. and long 114°14'U. within the area of TKi INTRUSIVE IGNEOUS ROCKS (TERTIARY .OR magnetic low, anomaly B, are not discerned by the CRETACEOUS)--Composition varying from aeromagnetic survey. monzonite to granodiorite, present only in The north-south-trending contour pattern, anomaly lower plate rocks (below the Snake Range C, showing westward increasing magnetic intensity deco l lement). Exposed as sills and small along the west edge of the map, probably reflects stocks and dikes intrusive rock beneath the upper platie. The upper rzus UNMETAMORPHOSED SEDIMENTARY ROCKS, UNDIVIDED plate is estimated to be about 2,450 ft thick (Hose, (PALEOZOIC)--Upper plate rocks (above the 1981). Low-gradient magnetic-high closures within the Snake Range decollement) consisting of broad north-south-trending anomaly possibly represent limestone, dolomite, shale, siltstone, phases of the buried intrusive rocks with high sandstone, and quartzite of the Arcturus magnetic susceptibility; however, the focal point of Formation, Riepe Spring Limestone, Ely the north-south-trending anomaly is a magnetic high limestone, Chainman Shale ( Joana limestone, located about 1.5 mi west of the roadless area at lat Pilot Shale, Guilmette limestone, Simonson 39°19' N.
  • White Pine County Community Assessment 2010

    White Pine County Community Assessment 2010

    White Pine County Community Assessment 2010 White Pine County Community Assessment October, 2010 Final Report Presented by Nevada Rural Development Council “This project was funded in part by a grant from the Nevada Commission on Economic Development Community Development Block Grant Program.” 1 | P a g e White Pine County Community Assessment 2010 Collaborating Partners University of Nevada Cooperative Extension Rural Nevada Development Corporation Nevada Association of Counties Carson City Chamber of Commerce Nevada Small Business Development Center Nevada Commission on Economic Development White Pine County City of Ely The People of White Pine County 2 | P a g e White Pine County Community Assessment 2010 White Pine County Community Assessment October 2010 Table of Contents Executive Summary…………………………...…………………………………….. 4 Introduction ………………………………………………………………………… 5 Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………….. 6 Nevada Rural Development Council…………………………………………………. 7 Strategic Planning and Community Assessments……………………………………. 8 Process for the Development of this Report……………………………………….... 9 Resource Team Members……………………………………………………………. 10 Local Steering Committee…………………………………………………………… 11 Schedule of Listening Sessions……………………………………………………… 12 Major Themes…………………………………...…………………………………… 13 Priority Setting Results……………………………………………………………… 14 Team Member Recommendations and Resources…………………………………... 15 Comments…………………………………………………………………………… 49 Additional Resources………………………………………………………………… 78 20 Clues to Rural Community Survival………………………………………………
  • Hwy 50 Visitor Guide 2011 Small.Pub

    Hwy 50 Visitor Guide 2011 Small.Pub

    Highway 50 Visitors Guide 2011 The Loneliest Road in America Visitors experience Nevada’s unique Basin and Range geography as they travel the Loneliest Road in America - Highway 50 Welcome to Highway 50, the Loneliest Road in America. This highway crosses Central Nevada through the Great Basin, a unique area because no water leaves the basin. Rivers begin, run, and go underground. They may resurface once in awhile but soon return underground. The route Highway 50 follows has been a pathway for travel for centuries. The Native Americans followed migrating herds of deer, antelope, and other game across Central Nevada. Early explorers crossing Nevada included John Fremont and Jedediah Smith. The Overland Stage later followed Smith’s route; then the Pony Express took this route, and finally, the transcontinental telegraph came over this area. On July 1, 1913, the Lincoln Highway Association was organized at Detroit, Michigan with the objective: “To procure the establish- ment of a continuous improved highway from the Atlantic to the Pacific, open to lawful traffic of all descrip- tions without toll charges and to be a lasting memorial to Abraham Lincoln.” (Lincoln Highway Association brochure) The Lincoln Highway was the first coast-to-coast highway, running from New York City to San Francisco. Dwight Eisenhower backed the idea as a young lieutenant colonel in the Army trying to move troops across the country. When he became President of the United States, he promoted the Interstate high- way system. Today, highways take travelers across the country in comfort. Reading journal accounts of pioneers cross- ing Nevada to get to the west coast, one can really appreciate travel conditions today.
  • White Pine Co. Wilderness Campaign Begins

    White Pine Co. Wilderness Campaign Begins

    FRIENDS OF NEVADA WILDERNESS Keeping Nevvvada Wild Since 1984 SPRING 2005 After a sixteen-year wait White Pine Co. wilderness campaign begins By Brian Beffort In 1989, the Nevada Wilderness Protection Act designated 14 Forest Service wilderness areas across the state, including Mt. Moriah and Currant Mountain in White Pine County. However, the bill did not designate certain other wild gems – namely the Schell Creek Range and Highland Ridge in the southern Snake Range. Friends of Nevada Wilderness has been waiting for Congress to return to the region and give these beautiful mountain ranges the protection they deserve. Sixteen years later, the opportunity is here. Celebrate On February 7, 2005, the White Pine County Commission sent a letter to Nevada’s Congressional Earth Day delegation, expressing their interest and desire for a White Pine County public lands bill. In their letter, with Friends of the commission specifically mentions wilderness as Nevada one of the opportunities they wish to address with legislation. Photo by Scott Smith Wilderness continued on page 5 Bristlecone pine in Mt. Grafton WSA in Union Pacific Dynamites Inside Reno Wilderness Page and Severe floods in January washed away roads, bridges and railroad tracks and bridges in Lincoln Front Lines 2 Las Vegas. County near several new Wilderness areas. While Earth Day events schedule 2 repairing the railroad, Union Pacific ignored the Details on Clover Mountain Wilderness boundary and blasted Hike the South Egan WSA 3 page 2. away 5 acres of beautiful cliff in the Wilderness to Wildlands deserve a fresh look 4 get rock. Had they bothered to contact the BLM, a rock source outside the Wilderness could have been Keeping Mormon Mtns wild 6 found easily.
  • BLM Nevada Sensitive and Status Species List Page 1 of 43

    BLM Nevada Sensitive and Status Species List Page 1 of 43

    BLM Nevada Sensitive and Status Species List A B C DEFGHIJK L M N 1 Current as of: 10/01/2017 Occurrence by BLM NV District Office Designation and Ranking of Battle Carson Southern others: NV Natural Heritage Elko Ely Winnemucca Critical Habitat Recovery Mtn City NV 2 Species Common Name Scientific Name Habitat Program; US Forest Service; NV Designated Plan 3 AMPHIBIANS open, ponded, or flowing water, with riparian vegetative cover in an early-to-intermediate successional stage to form a partial Amargosa Toad Anaxyrus nelsoni canopy for shade with minimal emergent vegetation at the NDOW (SP); NS-S (S2); NS (G2) x water's edges; adults also require adjacent vegetated uplands for nocturnal foraging 4 riparian areas from lowlands to high uplands including pine-oak Anaxyrus scrubland; rocky stream courses; may occur along irrigation FWS (petitioned 2013); ; NS-S (S2); Arizona toad x x microscaphus ditches and flooded fields, as well as streams bordered by NS (G3G4) willows and cottonwoods 5 wide variety of habitats including desert springs and streams, meadows, marshes, woodland, mountain wetlands and agricultural land. It is also known from around ponds, lakes, Anaxyrus boreas reservoirs, and slow-moving rivers and streams; undertake Boreal toad no rankings x ssp. seasonal migrations to and from breeding sites; newly metamorphosed young form large aggregations and migrate en masse to upland foraging areas.This species exhibits breeding 6 site fidelity closely associated with clear, slow-moving or ponded surface waters, with little shade, and relatively constant water Columbia spotted frog temperatures; Breeding and egg-laying occurs in waters with NDOW (SP); USFS (S); NS-S (S2S3); (including Toiyabe spotted Rana luteiventris floating vegetation and larger ponds such as oxbows, lakes, x X x NS (G4T2T3Q) frog subpopulation) stock ponds, and beaver-created ponds; overwinting occurs in spring heads and deep undercuts with overhanging vegetation and ice-covered deep ponds 7 Anaxyrus springs, seeps, streams, and similar inundated areas.
  • The Late Quaternary Biogeographic Histories of Some Great Basin Mammals (Western USA)

    The Late Quaternary Biogeographic Histories of Some Great Basin Mammals (Western USA)

    ARTICLE IN PRESS Quaternary Science Reviews ] (]]]]) ]]]–]]] The Late Quaternary biogeographic histories of some Great Basin mammals (western USA) Donald K. Graysonà Department of Anthropology, Box 353100, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA Received 21 November 2005; accepted 17 March 2006 Abstract The Great Basin of arid western North America provides one of the most detailed late Pleistocene and Holocene mammal records available for any part of the world, though the record is by far strongest for small mammals. Of the 35 genera of now-extinct North American Pleistocene mammals, 19 are known to have occurred in the Great Basin, a list that is likely to be complete or nearly so. Of these 19, seven can be shown to have survived beyond 12,000 radiocarbon years ago, a proportion similar to that for North America as a whole. Horses, camels, mammoth, and helmeted musk-oxen appear to have been the most abundant of these genera. Pygmy rabbits (Brachylagus idahoensis), yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris), and bushy-tailed woodrats (Neotoma cinerea) declined in abundance at the end of the Pleistocene, at about the same time as populations south of their current arid western distributional boundary were extirpated. Subsequent declines occurred during the hot/dry middle Holocene. Pygmy rabbits also declined as modern pinyon-juniper woodlands developed across the Great Basin. The Snake Range of eastern Nevada has seen the late Pleistocene or Holocene extinction of both northern pocket gophers (Thomomys talpoides) and pikas (Ochotona princeps). Coupled with the rarity of yellow-bellied marmots here, these histories make the Snake Range a biogeographic oddity.