DOCSLIB.ORG

Mineral Resources of the Marble Canyon Wilderness Study Area, White Pine County, Nevada, and Millard County, Utah

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mineral Resources of the Marble Canyon Wilderness Study Area, White Pine County, Nevada, and Millard County, Utah Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) Depository) 1990 Mineral Resources of the Marble Canyon Wilderness Study Area, White Pine County, Nevada, and Millard County, Utah United States Geological Survey Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/govdocs Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Recommended Citation United States Geological Survey, "Mineral Resources of the Marble Canyon Wilderness Study Area, White Pine County, Nevada, and Millard County, Utah" (1990). All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository). Paper 221. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/govdocs/221 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS u.s. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Bureau of Land Ma:l8gement Wilderness Study Area The Fe<!=! Land Policy and Management Act (Publio Law 94-579, October 21, 1976) requires MINERAL RESOURCES OF THE MARBLE CANYON the U.S. Geological Survey and U.S. Bureau of Mines to conduct mineral surveys on ccnain WlLDERNEf,s STUDY AREA, WHITE PINE COUNTY, NEVADA, AND MILLARD COUNTY, UTAH areas to determine !he rninerrJ values. if any, that may be prcsenL Results must be made By availabl. to the public and be submincd to the President and the Congress. This report presents Michael F. Digglesl• Gary A. Nowlan2, H. Richan! Blank, 1r.2, and Susan M. Marcus3 the results of a rnineral survey of pan of the Marble Canyon (NV·()40.086) Wilderness Study U.S. Geological Survey Area, White Pine County, Nevada. anJ Millan! County, Utah. and Ricban! F. Kness2 U.s. Bureau of Mines U.S. Geolocieal Survey Open.FUe Report 90-0522 Prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines "!lUI """" it poeIiminory ....... 1IOI boea __ CorccnCormi1y with u.s. Geological Suney eofitorial_ or _ die Nonh American -1JIIlIU< code. Any use of orode. produa. or f"'" -.it Cor clelcriplive ......... only .... does "'" imply --.by die U.s. Gow:mment 2ocnvcr, CO 80225 3Rcno, NV 89557 1990 2 FIGURES CONTENTS I. Index map showing 1ocation of the Marble Canyon Wilderness Study Atea. White Pine SIIIIlIDII)' 5 County, Nevada and MUlud County, Uuth. 6 Abstract 5 2. Mineral resource potential and &eneralized geology of the Marble Canyon Wilderness 0>8J1ICter and setting 5 Study Atea. Nevada and Uuth. 9 Identified mineral resources 5 3. Geochemical anomaly map of the Marble Canyon Wilderness Study Area, Nevada and Minenl ",source potential 7 Uuth. 16 Introduction 7 4. Aeromagnetic map of the Marble Canyon Wilderness Study Atea. Nevada and Uuth. 20 Location and physiography 7 5. Bouguer gravity anomaly map of the Marble Canyon Wilderness Study AteI, Nevada ProcedUIeS and sources of data 8 and Uuth. 22 Acknowledgments 10 Appraisal of identified resources 10 TABLE Mining IICIivity 10 Oilandps 11 I . Statistics for selected elements in drainage sampl-- ~olleCled in and near the Marble Results of flOld investigation II Canyon Wilderness S~Jdy Atea. Nevada and MiL ~d County, Uuth. 18 Smith CteeIc ldits II Limesrone and tnalble II Conclusions 12 _ Assessment of mineral resource potential 13 Geology 13 Lower-plate rocks 13 Upper-plate rocks 13 Teniary rocks and Quaternary surficial deposits 14 Sll'UCture and metamorphism 14 Geochemistry IS Methods and background IS Results and interpretation 17 Geophysics 19 Aeromagnetic data 19 Gravity data 21 Mineral ",soun;e potential 23 LimeSlOlle and marble 23 UoId and silver 23 Copper, lead, and zinc 23 Tunpten and molybdenum 23 BetyUium and fluorite 23 Barite 24 Oil andps 24 GeodIermaI energy 24 References cited 24 Appendixes 31 Definition of levels of mineral ",soun;e potential and certainty of assessment 32 Re~e clusif","tion 33 GeoIocic time chan 34 4 3 SUMMARY Abstract MAD! PROM BEST The 19,1 SO-acre Marble Canyon Wilderness Study Area (NV-040-o86) was AVAILABLE ~O" evaluated for mineral resources (known) and mineral resource potential (undiscovered), and field work was conducted in 1987. The acreage includes 6,435 acres that is now designated as part of the Mount Moriah Wilderness under the Nevada Wilderness Protection Act of 1989 (5. 974), most but not all of which is included in 8,300 acres for which the U.S. Bureau of land Management requested a mineral survey. In this report, the "wilderness study area; or simply "the study area" refers to the entire 19, ISO-acre tract. The area is underlain by au'!:tzite shale and carbonate rocks. The northern Snake Range decollement is a detachment surface within the study area that separates rocks of similar age but diffarent metamorphic grade. large inferred subeconomic 6mestone and marble resources in the study area have no spacial or unique properties. The mineral resource potential for limestona and marble is high in two canyons and is moderate in the rest 01 the wilderness study area. Parts of the study area 1bove and lIS· 00· ". ;"' : along the northern Snake Range decollement have low potential for undisc.. vered 30' i >- i depos~s of gold, silver, copper, lead, zinc, tungsten, mOlybdenum, beryllium, and j Nonh -, fluorite. A zone around barile-bearing rock penetrated by ds inside the southeast i ~ ~":l' boundary of the study area has moderate potential for barite, and the surrounding area , has low potential for barite; both areas also have low potential for silver, copper, lead, • i zinc, and tungsten. The entire study area has moderate potential for oil and gas and i i low potential lor geothermal energy resources. !") ; If ~ Character and Setting HIJMOOl.DT ;- . - . _ .1 NATIONAl. '. I MOM' The Marble Canyo.' Wilderncss Study Area covers approximately 19, ISO acres and is 10 I'OOEST • Moriah mi west of Gandy, Utah (fig. I). The terrain is rugged, and the elevation ranges from about i 9,331 ft II Thunder Mountain ID about S,240 ft in the southeast comer of the srudy area. Access "~-. i HUMBOl.DT ! NATIONAL ID and within the study area is by four-wheel-drive roads in Marble Wash, Coyote Canyon, Bars S ,J I'OOEST Canyon, and Smith Creek. ~ The study area is underlain by shalcs, quartzites, and carbonate rocks of early Paleozoic age (see "Appendixcs" for geologic time chan). The oldest exposed rocks in the area are shale, quartzite, and marble of Early and Middle Cambrian age. Shale of Late Cambrian age has been faulted over the older metamorphosed rocks. Dolomite, shale, and quanzite of Ordovician and Silurian age are also in fault contact with the Upper Cambrian rocks. The structura1 history of the study area includes the development of a detachment fault that juxtaposes metamorphosed Paleozoic rocks beneath, and in flat-fault contact with, less metamorphosed to nonrr.etamorphosed rocks. This detachment surface is pan of the northern Snake Range d&:ollemenl (dentined Mineral R .....rces Limestone has been prospected and quuried in and near the srudy area. Large inferred subeconomic limestone and marble resoun:es inside the srudy area are without special or unique propenies. The carbonate rocks are suitable for Ult in aggregate, but there are no nearby markets and sinnilar quality resoun:es are present elsewhere. Filii"' 1.-1Ddcx map 1bowiD~ of Marble Canyon Wilderness Srudy A-. White Pine Olumy, Nev.ta, and Olumy. Ulah. S Location and Physiography The exposed nonhc:m Snake Ranle ~llement within the study area is not mineralized, as indi<:ated by a IoI:k or SurflOC expressions and by sttum-sediment data. Samples taken from The Marble Canyon Wilderness Study Area comprises approximately 19,150 acres in the flult-breccia """"s in IIOIIJIIClamOrp CIIbonate rocks above the northern Snake Ranle Basin and Range physiographic province. It is situated in the northern Snake Range, principally d6coIlemcnt IXlIItain some palhfinder clements typico! or detachment-related deposits, but no in eastern White Pine County, Nev., but extending a short distance into Millard County, about 10 minera1 occurrences wete observed. mi southwest of Gandy, Uhth. The north and west boundaries follow MaJble Wash and Coyote Canyon, respectively. The south boundary follows a four-wheel-drive road from Coyote Canyon MIDeraI Resource Potential to the base of Thunder Mountain and the north boundary of the Mount Moriah l'ivision of Humboldt National Forest. The cast boundary follows a four-whcel-drive road along the alluvial In the Iower puts or Ban Canyon and Marble Wash the mineral resource potential for apron ncar the 6,OOO-ft contour. Elevations in the study area range from about 9,331 ft at limestooe and marble is hiah, and in the rest of the study area it is moderate. Thunder Mountain to about 5,240 ft in the southeast comer of the study area. The Nevada Wilderness Protection Act of 1989 designates 6,435 acres of the study area as part of the Mount Areas or the Marble Canyon Wilderness Study Area underlaiD by upper-plate rocks and Moriah Wilderness (fig. I). the """" of the nonhc:m Snake Ranac ~llcmcnt have low minera1 resource potential for lold, silver c:cppcr lead, zinc tunplal, molybdenum, betyllium, and fluorite. The lold and silver are Oimate in the study area is classified as arid; precipitation averages 10 in. per year and associated wid, Iow-anaie faults within those areas. GeochemicaJ evidence sUllests the resource supports vegetation of the Sonoran and Transition Zones. The higher elevations are in the potenrial foc c:cppcr, lead, zinc, tunptcn, and molybdenum in those areas. The geophysical Transition Zone where vegetaL..>n includes pinon and bristlecone pine.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Description and Correlation of Geologic Units, Cross
    Plate 2 UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Utah Geological Survey Bulletin 135 a division of Hydrogeologic Studies and Groundwater Monitoring in Snake Valley and Utah Department of Natural Resources Adjacent Hydrographic Areas, West-Central Utah and East-Central Nevada DESCRIPTION OF GEOLOGIC UNITS SOURCES USED FOR MAP COMPILATION UNIT CORRELATION AND UNIT CORRELATION HYDROGEOLOGIC Alluvial deposits – Sand, silt, clay and gravel; variable thickness; Holocene. Qal MDs Lower Mississippian and Upper Devonian sedimentary rocks, undivided – Best, M.G., Toth, M.I., Kowallis, B.J., Willis, J.B., and Best, V.C., 1989, GEOLOGIC UNITS UNITS Shale; consists primarily of the Pilot Shale; thickness about 850 feet in Geologic map of the Northern White Rock Mountains-Hamlin Valley area, Confining Playa deposits – Silt, clay, and evaporites; deposited along the floor of active Utah, 300–400 feet in Nevada. Aquifers Qp Beaver County, Utah, and Lincoln County, Nevada: U.S. Geological Survey Units playa systems; variable thickness; Pleistocene through Holocene. Map I-1881, 1 pl., scale 1:50,000. D Devonian sedimentary rocks, undivided – Limestone, dolomite, shale, and Holocene Qal Qsm Qp Qea Qafy Spring and wetland related deposits – Clay, silt, and sand; variable thickness; sandstone; includes the Guilmette Formation, Simonson and Sevy Fritz, W.H., 1968, Geologic map and sections of the southern Cherry Creek and Qsm Quaternary Holocene. Dolomite, and portions of the Pilot Shale in Utah; thickness about 4400– northern Egan Ranges, White Pine County, Nevada: Nevada Bureau of QTcs 4700 feet in Utah, 2100–4350 feet in Nevada. Mines Map 35, scale 1:62,500. Pleistocene Qls Qlm Qlg Qgt Qafo QTs QTfs Qea Eolian deposits – Sand and silt; deposited along valley floor margins, includes Hintze, L.H., 1963, Geologic map of Utah southwest quarter, Utah Sate Land active and vegetated dunes; variable thickness; Pleistocene through S Silurian sedimentary rocks, undivided – Dolomite; consists primarily of the Board, scale 1:250,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Mule Deer and Antelope Staff Specialist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist
    STATE OF NEVADA Steve Sisolak, Governor DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Tony Wasley, Director GAME DIVISION Brian F. Wakeling, Chief Mike Cox, Bighorn Sheep and Mountain Goat Staff Specialist Pat Jackson, Predator Management Staff Specialist Cody McKee, Elk Staff Biologist Cody Schroeder, Mule Deer and Antelope Staff Specialist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist Western Region Southern Region Eastern Region Regional Supervisors Mike Scott Steve Kimble Tom Donham Big Game Biologists Chris Hampson Joe Bennett Travis Allen Carl Lackey Pat Cummings Clint Garrett Kyle Neill Cooper Munson Sarah Hale Ed Partee Kari Huebner Jason Salisbury Matt Jeffress Kody Menghini Tyler Nall Scott Roberts This publication will be made available in an alternative format upon request. Nevada Department of Wildlife receives funding through the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration. Federal Laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability. If you believe you’ve been discriminated against in any NDOW program, activity, or facility, please write to the following: Diversity Program Manager or Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Nevada Department of Wildlife 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Mailstop: 7072-43 6980 Sierra Center Parkway, Suite 120 Arlington, VA 22203 Reno, Nevada 8911-2237 Individuals with hearing impairments may contact the Department via telecommunications device at our Headquarters at 775-688-1500 via a text telephone (TTY) telecommunications device by first calling the State of Nevada Relay Operator at 1-800-326-6868. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE 2018-2019 BIG GAME STATUS This program is supported by Federal financial assistance titled “Statewide Game Management” submitted to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Confusion Range, West-Central Utah: Fold-Thrust Deformation and a Western Utah Thrust Belt in the Sevier Hinterland
    The Confusion Range, west-central Utah: Fold-thrust deformation and a western Utah thrust belt in the Sevier hinterland David C. Greene* Department of Geosciences, Denison University, Granville, Ohio 43023, USA ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION tions together while delineating the lateral and oblique thrust ramps that form a signifi cant The Confusion Range in west-central Utah The Confusion Range is a collection of ridges complicating factor in the structure of the fold- has been considered a broad structural trough and small ranges that together form a low moun- thrust system. Together, these fi ve cross sections or synclinorium with little overall shorten- tain range in western Utah, between the more total almost 300 km in map length. Enlarged ing. However, new structural studies indicate imposing Snake Range on the west and House versions of the cross sections at a scale of that the Confusion Range is more accurately Range on the east (Figs. 1 and 2). The range is 1:50,000, along with a discussion of the petro- characterized as an east-vergent, fold-thrust named for its “rugged isolation and confusing leum potential of the region, may be found in system with ~10 km of horizontal shortening topography” (Van Cott, 1990). The Confusion Greene and Herring (2013). during Late Jurassic to Eocene Cordilleran Range exposes ~5000 m of Ordovician through Similar structural style and fold-thrust struc- contractional deformation. For this study, Triassic strata in what has been considered a tures are continuous southward throughout the four balanced and retrodeformable cross broad structural trough or synclinorium (e.g., length of the originally proposed synclinorium, sections across the Confusion Range and Hose, 1977; Anderson, 1983; Hintze and Davis, forming a fold-thrust belt more than 130 km in adjacent Tule Valley were constructed using 2003; Rowley et al., 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Isotope Hydrology of Lehman and Baker Creeks Drainages, Great Basin National Park, Nevada
    UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-1992 Isotope hydrology of Lehman and Baker creeks drainages, Great Basin National Park, Nevada Stephen Yaw Acheampong University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation Acheampong, Stephen Yaw, "Isotope hydrology of Lehman and Baker creeks drainages, Great Basin National Park, Nevada" (1992). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 195. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/3kmp-t8wo This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeologic and Geochemical Characterization of Groundwater
    Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Indian Affairs Hydrogeologic and Geochemical Characterization of Groundwater Resources in Deep Creek Valley and Adjacent Areas, Juab and Tooele Counties, Utah, and Elko and White Pine Counties, Nevada Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5097 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Windmill over an abandoned stock well on the Goshute Indian Reservation looking east with the Deep Creek Range in the background. Hydrogeologic and Geochemical Characterization of Groundwater Resources in Deep Creek Valley and Adjacent Areas, Juab and Tooele Counties, Utah, and Elko and White Pine Counties, Nevada By Philip M. Gardner and Melissa D. Masbruch Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Indian Affairs Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5097 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin and Evolution of the Southern Snake Range Decollement, East Central Nevada Allen J
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Dayton University of Dayton eCommons Geology Faculty Publications Department of Geology 2-1993 The Origin and Evolution of the Southern Snake Range Decollement, East Central Nevada Allen J. McGrew University of Dayton, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.udayton.edu/geo_fac_pub Part of the Geology Commons, Geomorphology Commons, Geophysics and Seismology Commons, Glaciology Commons, Hydrology Commons, Other Environmental Sciences Commons, Paleontology Commons, Sedimentology Commons, Soil Science Commons, Stratigraphy Commons, and the Tectonics and Structure Commons eCommons Citation McGrew, Allen J., "The Origin and Evolution of the Southern Snake Range Decollement, East Central Nevada" (1993). Geology Faculty Publications. 29. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/geo_fac_pub/29 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Geology at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. TECTONICS, VOL. 12, NO. 1, PAGES 21-34, FEBRUARY 1993 THE ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF INTRODUCTION THE SOUTHERN SNAKE RANGE The origin,kinematic significance and geometrical evolu- DECOLLEMENT, EAST CENTRAL tion of shallowlyinclined normal fault systemsare NEVADA fundamentalissues in extensionaltectonics. Regionally extensivefaults that juxtapose nonmetamorphic sedimentary Allen J. McGrew1 rocksin theirhanging walls againstplastically deformed Departmentof Geology,Stanford University, Stanford, crystallinerocks in their footwallscommand special California attentionbecause they offer rare opportunitiesto characterize kinematiclinkages between contrasting structural levels. Thesefaults, commonly known as detachmentfaults, are the Abstract.Regional and local stratigraphic, metamorphic, subjectsof muchcontroversy.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F3.14 Special Designations
    Appendix F3.14 Special Designations Clark, Lincoln, and White Pine Counties Groundwater Development Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement 228 ALT 93 93 Elko County White Pine County 278 Tooele County 2 Callao 489 Juab County Blue Mass Scenic Area 893 Gandy Salt Marsh Juab County 892 93 Millard County Eureka Opt. 1 McGill Delta Gandy Mountain Caves 50 486 Swamp Cedar Ely Rose Guano Bat Cave Baker Eureka Honeymoon Archaeological Site County Hill / City of Rocks Eskdale 6 White Pine County 487 159 Baker Snake Creek Nye County Shoshone Ponds Garrison Indian Burial Cave Fossil Mountain Opt. 2 894 Wah Baking Powder Flat Wah 318 Mountains 15 Sev Millard County Coun 6 Beaver County 21 White River Valley 93 Beaver County Iron County Opt. 3 Nye County Highland Range Lincoln County 375 Pioche Condor Canyon Panaca Garfield County Pahroc Rock Art Schlesser Mount Irish Pincushion 56 Iron County 318 Caliente 120 Hiko Washington County Opt. 4 317 93 Alamo Shooting Upper Beaver Kane Gallery Lower Meadow Dam Wash Valley Wash County Lower Meadow 89 Valley Mormon Wash 15 Mesa - Ely Nevada Utah Kane Springs Mormon Mesa - Ely Arizona 389 Lincoln County Mesquite Beaver Dam Slope Mormon Mesa Clark County 15 168 Virgin River Mormon Mesa/Arrow Canyon Virgin Mountains Project Components Gold Buried Storage Reservoir and Indian Coyote Arrow Canyon Springs Butte, Water Treatment Facility Springs 95 Part A Construction Support Area Pressure Reducing Station Primary Electrical Substation Hidden Secondary Electrical Substation Valley Pumping Station and Primary
    [Show full text]
  • DIVISION C—OTHER PROVISIONS TITLE III—WHITE PINE COUNTY CON- SERVATION, RECREATION, and DE- VELOPMENT Subtitle A—Land Disp
    G:\COMP\109\WHITE PINE COUNTY CONSERVATION, RECREATION, A....XML White Pine County Conservation, Recreation, and Development Act of 2006 [Title III of division C of Public Law 109–432] [As Amended Through P.L. 116–9, Enacted March 12, 2019] øCurrency: This publication is a compilation of the text of Public Law 109–432. It was last amended by the public law listed in the As Amended Through note above and below at the bottom of each page of the pdf version and reflects current law through the date of the enactment of the public law listed at https:// www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/comps/¿ øNote: While this publication does not represent an official version of any Federal statute, substantial efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of its contents. The official version of Federal law is found in the United States Statutes at Large and in the United States Code. The legal effect to be given to the Statutes at Large and the United States Code is established by statute (1 U.S.C. 112, 204).¿ AN ACT To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend expiring provisions, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, * * * * * * * DIVISION C—OTHER PROVISIONS * * * * * * * TITLE III—WHITE PINE COUNTY CON- SERVATION, RECREATION, AND DE- VELOPMENT SEC. 301. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are nec- essary to carry out this title. SEC. 302. ø16 U.S.C. 1241 note¿ SHORT TITLE This title may be cited as the ‘‘White Pine County Conserva- tion, Recreation, and Development Act of 2006’’.
    [Show full text]
  • AND SCHELL CREEK DIVISIONS of the James O. Klemmedson
    An Inventory of Bristlecone Pine in the Snake, Mount Moriah, Ward Mountain, and Schell Creek Divisions of the Humboldt National Forest Authors Klemmedson, James O.; Beasley, R. Scott Publisher Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Rights Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. The University of Arizona. Download date 02/10/2021 17:39:02 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/302516 Report AN INVENTORY OF BRISTLECONE PINE IN THE SNAKE, MOUNT MORIAH, WARD MOUNTAIN, AND SCHELL CREEK DIVISIONS OF THE HUMBOLDT NATIONAL FOREST Prepared by James O. Klemmedson and R. Scott Beasley* Submitted to REGIONAL FORESTER, U.S. FOREST SERVICE OGDEN, UTAH in accordance with a COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT between the FOREST SERVICE and LABORATORY OF TREE-RING RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA for A JOINT INVENTORY AND DENDROCHRONOLOGICAL STUDY OF BRISTLECONE PINE * Department of Watershed Management, University of Arizona INTRODUCTION Bristlecone pine, Pinus aristata Engeim., is a species which inhabits high altitudes of the mountainous southwestern United States. It occurs from the Front Range of Colorado through Utah, northern New Mexico and Arizona to the White Mountains of California along the Nevada border in the west. Bristlecone pine commonly occurs in small open groves on arid slopes, but it also grows in association with limber and ponderosa pines, white fir, Douglas - fir, and Engelmann spruce, generally above the 8000 -foot level. This tree has little economic value as a timber species, but does provide a protective and beautifying cover to the landscape. A newly -acquired interst in bristlecone pine stems from the discovery that these trees reach tremendous ages.
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping Washoe Wild
    Frontlines 2 Spring Breakers Defend the Desert 3 WSAs Under Threat & Wall Canyon 4-5 Desert Refuge Updates 6 Wildlife & Mt. Charleston 7 INSIDE Stewardship & Public Lands Defense 8-9 Washoe Cont’d & Who’s New at FNW 10-11 SPRING/SUMMER 2018 NEVADAWILDERNESS.ORG KEEPING WASHOE WILD ashoe County is blessed with an abundance of public lands that provide sweeping vistas, expansive sagebrush seas, andW healthy populations of pronghorn, bighorn sheep, numerous reptiles, song birds and a stronghold for the Greater Sage-Grouse. In this wild region stretching north of Pyramid Lake to the Oregon border, the roads are dirt, there is little cell phone coverage, and nature rules. Unfortunately, the Washoe County Commissioners seem more interested in development than conservation and they are proposing to eliminate protections that have been in place since 1980 for many of these wild places. Their proposal to strip protections for 62% of our county’s Wilderness Study Areas is appalling. Fortunately during the public hearings held April 24th and 26th, your voices were heard loud and clear standing up for Wilderness and open space. The need for Wilderness - protected lands where the forces of nature are allowed the opportunity to operate, uninhibited from human interference – becomes more and more pressing as the population of the Truckee Meadows swells. Our quality of life, including a broad range of outdoor recreation opportunities and beautiful backcountry are what makes living in Washoe County special. Friends of Nevada Wilderness has been invested in working alongside local legislators and various stakeholders to help find a balance Continued on Page 10 A storm rolls in over Massacre Rim Wilderness Study Area.
    [Show full text]
  • MULE DEER Units 114-115
    Nevada Hunter Information Sheet MULE DEER Units 114-115 LOCATION: Eastern White Pine County – Snake Range. Please see unit descriptions in the Nevada Hunt Book. ELEVATION: From 5,100' in Snake Valley to 12,050' on Mount Moriah. TERRAIN: Gentle to extremely difficult. VEGETATION: Ranges from salt-desert shrub on some valley floors through sage and mixed brush, pinyon/juniper, mountain mahogany and aspen types at mid elevations to aspen/fir/spruce/limber pine/bristlecone pine at higher elevations. Mountainous areas support forest types more than brush, with pinyon and juniper dominating many areas between 6,500’ and 8,000’. Aspen is a minor component in both units. LAND STATUS: The majority of deer habitat is public land administered by either the BLM Ely Field Office or the Ely Ranger District of the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest (USFS). Hunting is not permitted on National Park Service lands (Great Basin National Park) located in Unit 115. Note: In 2006, Congress added 11,000 acres to the Mt. Moriah Wilderness in Unit 114 and created a new wilderness area (69,000 acres) on the south end of Unit 115. Vehicles and mechanized equipment, including wheeled game carriers are prohibited in wilderness areas. Contact the Federal Land Management Agency responsible for the area you intend to hunt for more information. Most private land is located on valley bottoms and benches. Private lands do not restrict access to public land. HUNTER ACCESS: Good to fair, based on weather and ground conditions. Access to Unit 114 can be impacted by winter storms. Motorized access is limited by existing roads, terrain and wilderness designations.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Elevation Five Needle Pine Cone Collections in California and Nevada
    High-elevation white pine cone collections from the Great Basin of Nevada, California, & Utah on National Forest, Bureau of Land Management, National Park, and State lands, 2009 – 2013. Collected 40-50 cones/tree. 2009 (all on NFS land): 3 sites # trees Schell Creek Range, Cave Mtn., NV Pinus longaeva 100 Spring Mtns., Lee Canyon, NV Pinus longaeva 100 White Mtns., Boundary Peak, NV Pinus longaeva 100 2010 (all on NFS land except as noted): 7 sites Carson Range, Mt. Rose, NV Pinus albicaulis 23 Hawkins Peak, CA Pinus albicaulis 26 Luther Creek, CA Pinus lambertiana 15 Monitor Pass, CA Pinus lambertiana 25 Pine Forest Range, NV [BLM] Pinus albicaulis 20 Sweetwater Mtns., NV Pinus albicaulis 20 Wassuk Range, Corey Pk., NV [BLM] Pinus albicaulis 25 2011 (all on NFS land except as noted): 13 sites Fish Creek Range, NV [BLM] Pinus flexilis 25 Fish Creek Range, NV [BLM] Pinus longaeva 25 Grant Range, NV Pinus flexilis 25 Highland Range, NV [BLM] Pinus longaeva 25 Independence Mtns., NV Pinus albicaulis 17 Jarbidge Mtns., NV Pinus albicaulis 25 Pequop Mtns., NV [BLM] Pinus longaeva 25 Ruby Mtns., Lamoille Canyon, NV Pinus albicaulis 25 Ruby Mtns., Lamoille Canyon, NV Pinus flexilis 20 Schell Creek Range, Cave Mtn., NV Pinus flexilis 25 Sweetwater Mtns., NV Pinus flexilis 25 White Pine Range, Mt. Hamilton, NV Pinus flexilis 25 White Pine Range, Mt. Hamilton, NV Pinus longaeva 25 2012 (all on NFS land except as noted): 9 sites Black Mountain, Inyo NF, CA Pinus longaeva 23 Carson Range, LTBMU, NV Pinus albicaulis 25 Egan Range, Toiyabe NF, NV Pinus longaeva 25 Emma Lake, Toiyabe NF, CA Pinus albicaulis 25 Happy Valley, Fishlake NF, UT Pinus longaeva 25 Inyo Mtns., Tamarack Canyon, CA Pinus longaeva 25 Leavitt Lake, Toiyabe NF, CA Pinus albicaulis 25 Mt.
    [Show full text]