DOCSLIB.ORG

Discovery of a Large 2.4 Ma Plinian Eruption of Basse-Terre, Guadeloupe, from the Marine Sediment Record

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Discovery of a Large 2.4 Ma Plinian Eruption of Basse-Terre, Guadeloupe, from the Marine Sediment Record Discovery of a large 2.4 Ma Plinian eruption of Basse-Terre, Guadeloupe, from the marine sediment record Martin R. Palmer1, Stuart J. Hatter1, Thomas M. Gernon1, Rex N. Taylor1, Michael Cassidy2, Peter Johnson1, Anne Le Friant3, and Osamu Ishizuka4 1School of Ocean and Earth Science, University of Southampton, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK 2Institute for Geosciences, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, J.-J.-Becher-Weg 21, D-55128 Mainz, Germany 3Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, UMR 7154, CNRS, Paris, France 4Institute of Geology and Geoinformation, Geological Survey of Japan, AIST, Central 7, 1-1-1, Higashi, Ibaraki, Tsukuba 305-8567, Japan ABSTRACT Figure 1. Northern Lesser St. Kitts Outer arc Large volcanic eruptions are major geo- Antilles (Caribbean Sea) map with Integrated hazards, so identifying their frequency in Nevis Antigua upper layer Ocean Drilling Program the geologic record is critical for making 6 cm 17oN Expedition 340 Site predictions and hazard assessments. Follow- Montserrat U1396 location. Inset shows image of tephra ing the discovery of a thick (18 cm) tephra lower layer layer T2.36. Also shown layer in marine sediments from Integrated 12 cm are Guadeloupe volca- Ocean Drilling Program (IODP) Site U1396 U1396 BC nic centers: Basal Com- between Montserrat and Guadeloupe in the SC plex (BC), Septentrional Caribbean Sea, we document here how high- Guadeloupe AC Chain (SC), Axial Chain 16oN (AC), Grande Découverte precision Pb isotopes, trace elements, and GD LS U1396A U1396C (GD), and Les Saintes grain morphological analyses of the tephra 6H4 6H2 (LS) (Samper et al., 2007, can be used, together with volcanological 2009). White circles indi- Dominica models, to identify a large (Volcanic Explo- Atlantic cate sampling locations Ocean for grain-size analyses sivity Index ~6) Plinian eruption from Basse- Inner arc (Hole U1396A) and geo- Terre, Guadeloupe, at ca. 2.36 Ma. This pre- 62oW 61oW 60oW chemistry and grain mor- viously unrecognized eruption is believed to phology (Hole U1396C). be the largest documented volcanic event in this region since this time. We hypothesize that this large eruption was associated with nism in the northern Lesser Antilles, Integrated et al., 2007), but there is a clear north-south gra- the final stage in the evolution of an individ- Ocean Drilling Program (IODP) Expedition dation in the Pb isotope ratio of volcanic rocks ual volcanic center, which has implications 340 occupied four sites in A.D. 2012 offshore in the Lesser Antilles that has been present for for prediction of geohazards in this setting. the currently active island of Montserrat. Site ~5 m.y. (Lindsay et al., 2005; Labanieh et al., U1396 is located on a topographic high (water 2010), and Pb isotope analyses of Montserrat INTRODUCTION depth of ~780 m), ~30 km southwest of Mont- (Cassidy et al., 2012) and Guadeloupe lavas Reconstructing the history of island arc vol- serrat and ~75 km west of Guadeloupe (Fig. 1). (White and Dupré, 1986) show that the two cen- canoes is critical for determining their petro- Of the three holes cored at the site with the ad- ters are distinguishable (Fig. 2A; see the GSA logical evolution and potential geohazards, but vanced piston corer, two produced continuous Data Repository1). The one Dominican Pb iso- such studies are difficult because erosion and (Hole U1396A, 140.5 m; Hole U1396C, 145.9 tope datum that lies in the Guadeloupe field is later eruptions destroy and obscure the subaerial m) records that extend back ~4.5 m.y. (Hatfield, from the <40 ka Morne Anglais center (Lindsay record of volcanoes, with much of the erupted 2015). The sediments comprise hemipelagic et al., 2005). Of 29 samples of visible tephras material rapidly transported to the oceans (Le (largely carbonate) sediment and volcaniclastic analyzed from Site U1396 and shown in Figure Friant et al., 2015). While marine sediment mud, with more than 150 visible (>0.5 cm thick) 1, 17 fall in the Montserrat Pb isotope field and cores can provide more complete histories of arc tephra layers intercalated in hemipelagic back- 12 in the Guadeloupe field. Of the latter, five volcanism, this approach requires identification ground sediments (Le Friant et al., 2015). The come from an ~18-cm-thick tephra layer (sub- of the depositional mode of marine tephra layers present study uses geochemical, grain morphol- cores 6H4-U1396A and 6H2-U1396C). The and their precise origin from closely spaced and ogy, and volcanological techniques to identify other samples with a Guadeloupe origin come compositionally similar volcanoes. the origin and magnitude of the eruption that from tephra layers <5 cm thick. This problem is exemplified in the Lesser generated the thickest tephra layer from Site The sedimentary interval of the tephra layer Antilles, Caribbean Sea, where volcanism has U1396. (Fig. 1) is bracketed by the base of the C2r.1n been active since ca. 40 Ma. To the north of (B) Reunion polarity zone (2.148 Ma) and the Martinique, the arc is divided into two chains. SEDIMENT CORE OBSERVATIONS base of the C2r.2r (B) Gauss/Matuyama polar- The eastern, inactive chain is older, with carbon- Tephra was likely delivered to Site U1396 ity zone (2.581 Ma) (Hatfield, 2015) and has an ate platforms covering volcanic basement. Tec- from different sources, but prevailing wind di- tonic adjustments during the Miocene modified rections and seafloor topography suggest, how- 1 GSA Data Repository item 2016031, T2.36 geo- the orientation of the subducting slab, causing ever, that these layers were predominantly from chemical data tables, figure of tephra grain morpho- westward migration of the volcanic front and volcanoes on Montserrat and Guadeloupe. The logical characteristics, and age assignment details, is available online at www.geosociety.org/pubs/ft2016 initiation of a new arc that includes all the ac- erupted material on both islands consists mainly .htm, or on request from [email protected] or tive volcanoes (Pindell and Barrett, 1990). In of andesites, with lesser amounts of basalts and Documents Secretary, GSA, P.O. Box 9140, Boulder, order to reconstruct a long-term record of volca- basaltic andesites (Harford et al., 2002; Samper CO 80301, USA. GEOLOGY, February 2016; v. 44; no. 2; p. 123–126 | Data Repository item 2016031 | doi:10.1130/G37193.1 | Published online 22 December 2015 GEOLOGY© 2015 The Authors.| Volume Gold 44 |Open Number Access: 2 | www.gsapubs.orgThis paper is published under the terms of the CC-BY license. 123 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article-pdf/44/2/123/3549285/123.pdf by guest on 01 October 2021 16 Axial Chain (1.02–0.44 Ma) and the Grande ) 40 A Découverte volcanic complex (314 ka to pres- Upper 77/78 ent) (Samper et al., 2007, 2009) (Fig. 1). K-Ar 30 Layer 79/80 12 ages show a north-south migration of volcanic 81/82 4 Montserrat activity, with a relatively large age gap between 20 7/ ∆ Guadeloupe the youngest dates for the Basal Complex (2.68 8 Dominica ± 0.04 Ma) and the oldest age for the Septentri- 10 U1396 onal Chain (1.81 ± 0.03 Ma). In addition, there T 2.36 0 are K-Ar dates for the two volcanic islands— -0.5 1.5 3.5 5.5 7.59.5 4 Les Saintes (Terre-de-Bas, 0.92–0.88 Ma; and 18.8 19.0 19.2 19.4 40 Terre-de-Haut, 2.98–2.00 Ma)—that lie ~10 km Lower 206Pb/204Pb 83/84 south of Basse-Terre (Zami et al., 2014). 30 Layer 86/87 The latitude of the source of T is uncer- 3 2.36 90/91 Terre-de-Haut tain, but is likely south of the older Basal Com- 20 Basal Complex B N plex (~16°19′N). The depositional age of T2.36 ) Septentrional T2.36 lies within the age range of activity on Terre-de- 10 2 Haut, but the La/Sm ratio of samples from T2.36 fall on the Basse-Terre trend that is distinct from 0 Fraction of particles in sample (% -0.5 1.5 3.5 5.5 7.59.5 (La/Sm that of Terre-de-Haut lavas (Fig. 2B). Hence geochemical and age data suggest that T Bin size φ 1 2.36 likely derived from Basse-Terre, with equivalent Figure 3. Grain-size analyses of tephra deposits of this source now buried beneath the samples from Integrated Ocean Drilling Pro- 123 Septentrional and Axial Chain centers. gram Hole U1396A, northern Lesser Antilles (77/78, etc., refer to depth intervals [in cm] Age (Ma) The five sampled layers from T2.36 have MgO and SiO concentrations that range from 1.12 to shown in Fig. 1). Figure 2. Pb isotope and geochemistry data 2 of tephra and volcanic samples, northern 2.75 wt% and 59.4 to 64.6 wt%, respectively Lesser Antilles. A: D7/4 (relative to North- (see the Data Repository for methods), which ern Hemisphere reference line; Hart, 1984) are typical of andesites from Basse-Terre (Sam- wind direction reverses from east to west in the versus 206Pb/204Pb. Pb isotope data are for per et al., 2007, 2009). wet season, to west to east in the dry season (Ko- islands from Dominica (Lindsay et al., 2005), morowski et al., 2008). Stratospheric circulation Montserrat (Cassidy et al., 2012), and Gua- deloupe (White and Dupré, 1986; C. Chauvel, ERUPTION RECONSTRUCTION at this latitude is controlled by Brewer-Dobson 2015, personal commun.). Green symbols It is difficult to unequivocally determine circulation (Andrews et al., 1987), so there is no are for Integrated Ocean Drilling Program whether more than one eruption was responsible a priori reason to expect that stratospheric wind Site U1396, and red symbols are for tephra for deposition of T .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mount Vesuvius Is Located on the Gulf of Naples, in Italy
    Mount Vesuvius is located on the Gulf of Naples, in Italy. It is close to the coast and lies around 9km from the city of Naples. Despite being the only active volcano on mainland Europe, and one of the most dangerous volcanoes, almost 3 million people live in the immediate area. Did you know..? Mount Vesuvius last erupted in 1944. Photo courtesy of Ross Elliot(@flickr.com) - granted under creative commons licence – attribution Mount Vesuvius is one of a number of volcanoes that form the Campanian volcanic arc. This is a series of volcanoes that are active, dormant or extinct. Vesuvius Campi Flegrei Stromboli Mount Vesuvius is actually a Vulcano Panarea volcano within a volcano. Mount Etna Somma is the remain of a large Campi Flegrei del volcano, out of which Mount Mar di Sicilia Vesuvius has grown. Did you know..? Mount Vesuvius is 1,281m high. Mount Etna is another volcano in the Campanian arc. It is Europe’s most active volcano. Mount Vesuvius last erupted in 1944. This was during the Second World War and the eruption caused great problems for the newly arrived Allied forces. Aircraft were destroyed, an airbase was evacuated and 26 people died. Three villages were also destroyed. 1944 was the last recorded eruption but scientists continue to monitor activity as Mount Vesuvius is especially dangerous. Did you know..? During the 1944 eruption, the lava flow stopped at the steps of the local church in the village of San Giorgio a Cremano. The villagers call this a miracle! Photo courtesy of National Museum of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Eruption Styles
    eerruuppttiioonn ssttyylleess OIKOS > volcano > mechanism >eruption styles z z z Why do some volcanoes erupt violently and others do not? The z z viscosity of magma and lava determines how a volcano will behave. z z Volcanoes that are highly explosive and therefore dangerous to z z people are built-up as highly viscous magma that forces its way to z z the surface, often exploding violently as trapped gasses try to z z escape. Volcanoes that are less explosive and less of a threat to z z people are made up of very fluid magmas. Fluid magma allows z z gasses to escape and therefore are less explosive. There are three z z factors that determine the viscosity of a magma and its resulting z z z lava: z z a) chemical composition of magma: which means silica content z z (amount of SiO2). Magma with a high silica content are sticky and z more viscous. b) magma temperature e viscosity: usually lava is between 600 and 1200 degrees Celcius. Basaltic lavas have the highest temperatures up to 1200 C. Rhyolitic and andesitic lavas are cooler when they erupt. The higher the temperature, the less vacuous magma will be. c) volume of dissolved gasses in magma. As gasses escape from magma in the vent as pressure is released, they propel material out in an explosive way. As magma moves to the surface through a vent, the confining pressure of the surrounding environment decreases rapidly. This reduction of the confining pressure allows the dissolved gases to be released suddenly. The escaping gases in the magma expand and may occupy hundreds of times their original volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Volcanoes, Based on Recent Seismic Activity; There Are Over 200 Geological Young Volcanic Centres
    Volcanoes of Canada 1 V4 C.J. Hickson and M. Ulmi, Jan. 3, 2006 • Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics Where do volcanoes occur? Driving forces • Volcano chemistry and eruption types • Volcanic Hazards Pyroclastic flows and surges Lava flows Ash fall (tephra) Lahars/Debris Flows Debris Avalanches Volcanic Gases • Anatomy of an Eruption – Mt. St. Helens • Volcanoes of Canada Stikine volcanic belt Presentation Outline Anahim volcanic belt Wells Gray – Clearwater volcanic field 2 Garibaldi volcanic belt • USA volcanoes – Cascade Magmatic Arc V4 Volcanoes in Our Backyard Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics In Canada, British Columbia and Yukon are the host to a vast wealth of volcanic 3 landforms. V4 How many active volcanoes are there on Earth? • Erupting now about 20 • Each year 50-70 • Each decade about 160 • Historical eruptions about 550 Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics • Holocene eruptions (last 10,000 years) about 1500 Although none of Canada’s volcanoes are erupting now, they have been active as recently as a couple of 4 hundred years ago. V4 The Earth’s Beginning Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics 5 V4 The Earth’s Beginning These global forces have created, mountain Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics ranges, continents and oceans. 6 V4 continental crust ic ocean crust mantle Where do volcanoes occur? Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics 7 V4 Driving Forces: Moving Plates Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics 8 V4 Driving Forces: Subduction Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics 9 V4 Driving Forces: Hot Spots Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics 10 V4 Driving Forces: Rifting Global Volcanism and Plate tectonics Ocean plates moving apart create new crust.
    [Show full text]
  • Largest Explosive Eruption in Historical Times in the Andes at A.D
    b- Largest explosive eruption in historical times in the Andes at A.D. Huaynaputina volcano, 1600, southern Peru Jean-Claude ThOuret* IRD and Instituto Geofisicodel PerÚ, Calle Calatrava 21 6. Urbanización Camino Real, La Molina, Lima 12, Perú Jasmine Davila Instituto Geofísico del Perú, Lima, Perú Jean-Philippe Eissen IRD Centre de Brest BP 70, 29280 Plouzane Cedex, France ABSTRACT lent [DREI volume. km': Table The The largest esplosive eruption (volcanic explosivity index of 6) in historical times in the 4.4-5.6 I). tephra is composed of -SO% pumice with rhyolitic Andes took place in 1600 at Huaynaputina volcano in southern Peru. According to chroni- A.D. glass, crystals (mostly amphibole and bio- cles, the eruption began on February 19 with a Plinian phase and lasted until March 6. Repeated 15% tite), and 5% xenoliths including hydrothermally tephra falls, pyroclastic flows, and surges devastated an area 70 x 40 kni? west of the vent and altered fragments from the volcanic and sedimen- affected all of southern Peru, and earthquakes shook the city of Arequipa 75 km away. Eight tnry bedrock, and a small amount of accessory lwa deposits, totaling 10.2-13.1 km3 in bulk volume, are attributed to this eruption: (1) a widespread, fragments. The erupted pumice is a white, , -S.1 kn3 pumice-fall deposit; (2) channeled ignimbrites (1.6-2 km3) with (3) ground-surge and medium-potassicdacite (average SiO, and ash-cloud-surge deposits; (4) widespread co-ignimbrite ash layers; (5) base-surge deposits; (6) 63.6% 1.85% hlgO) of the potassic calc-alkalic suite.
    [Show full text]
  • Eruption Dynamics of Magmatic/Phreatomagmatic Eruptions of Low-Viscosity Phonolitic Magmas: Case of the Laacher See Eruption (Eifel, Germany)
    FACULTEIT WETENSCHAPPEN Opleiding Master in de Geologie Eruption dynamics of magmatic/phreatomagmatic eruptions of low-viscosity phonolitic magmas: Case of the Laacher See eruption (Eifel, Germany) Gert-Jan Peeters Academiejaar 2011–2012 Scriptie voorgelegd tot het behalen van de graad Van Master in de Geologie Promotor: Prof. Dr. V. Cnudde Co-promotor: Dr. K. Fontijn, Dr. G. Ernst Leescommissie: Prof. Dr. P. Vandenhaute, Prof. Dr. M. Kervyn Foreword There are a few people who I would like to thank for their efforts in helping me conduct the research necessary to write this thesis. Firstly, I would specially like to thank my co-promotor Dr. Karen Fontijn for all the time she put into this thesis which is a lot. Even though she was abroad most of the year, she was always there to help me and give me her opinion/advice whether by e-mail or by Skype and whether it was in the early morning or at midnight. Over the past three years, I learned a lot from her about volcanology and conducting research in general going from how volcanic deposits look on the field and how to sample them to how to measure accurately and systematically in the laboratory to ultimately how to write scientifically. I would also like to thank my promoter Prof. Dr. Veerle Cnudde for giving me the opportunity to do my thesis about volcanology even though it is not in her area of expertise and the opportunity to use the µCT multiple times. I thank the entire UGCT especially Wesley De Boever, Tim De Kock, Marijn Boone and Jan Dewanckele for helping me with preparing thin sections, drilling subsamples, explaining how Morpho+ works, solving problems when Morpho+ decided to crash etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Basaltic Plinian Activity at Masaya Caldera, Nicaragua
    EGU2020-9513 https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-9513 EGU General Assembly 2020 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Understanding basaltic Plinian activity at Masaya caldera, Nicaragua Emily C Bamber1, Fabio Arzilli1, Margherita Polacci1, Giuseppe La Spina1, Maurizio Petrelli2, Margaret E Hartley1, Danilo Di Genova3, Jonathan Fellowes1, David Chavarría4, Jose Armando Saballos4, Mattia De' Michieli Vitturi5, and Mike Burton1 1The University of Manchester, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Manchester, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ([email protected]) 2Università degli Studi di Perugia, Department of Physics and Geology, Perugia, Italy 3Technische Universität Clausthal, Institute of Non-Metallic Materials, Clausthal, Germany 4Instituto Nicaragüense de Estudios Territoriales (INETER), Managua, Nicaragua 5Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Pisa, Italy Plinian eruptions are the most hazardous yet enigmatic style of volcanism at basaltic systems. The low viscosity of basaltic magma should preclude its fragmentation; however, there are several recognised examples of basaltic Plinian activity. Historical eruptions of Masaya caldera, Nicaragua; Etna, Italy (122 BC); and Tarawera, New Zealand (1886) have ejected > 1 km3 of material. The Las Sierras-Masaya volcanic complex (Masaya caldera) has produced several basaltic Plinian eruptions, yet currently exhibits low explosive-effusive activity. This volcano has erupted chemically homogeneous magmas over at least the past 6000 years, which suggests that this significant difference in eruptive style is not attributable to a compositional change. Therefore, the cause of increased explosivity at Masaya caldera remains uncertain. We present new measurements of major, trace and volatile elements in basaltic Plinian eruption products from the Fontana Lapilli (60 ka) and Masaya Triple Layer (2.1 ka) eruptions of the Las Sierras- Masaya volcanic complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount St Helens – How the Eruption of a Well-Known Volcano Caused Unexpected Death and Destruction Introduction Mount St. Hele
    Mount St Helens – how the eruption of a well-known volcano caused unexpected death and destruction Introduction Mount St. Helens, a stratovolcano or composite volcano located in Washington State, USA (46.2º latitude north, 122.2º longitude west,) erupted violently on the Sunday morning of May 18th 1980 at precisely 8:32. The Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) was recorded to be 5, out of a potential 8, its devastation bringing death to around 57 people directly, along with a plane crash and a traffic accident killing a total of 7 more. The cost of the event itself reached to a height of 1.1 billion dollars. Location of Mount St Helens There are around 550 ‘active’ volcanoes and the vast majority are found among plate boundaries. Causes of the eruption Mount St. Helens sits on the plate boundary between Juan de Fuca and the North American plates (map above). The boundary is part of the so- called ‘Ring of Fire’ - the string of volcanoes that congregate around the margin of the Pacific Ocean. The plate margin that created Mount St. Helens was destructive, with Juan de Fuca plate subducting beneath the North American, producing the line of volcanoes along the Cascade Mountain Range. The fierce 1980 eruption occurred because of the destructive nature of the margin between the Juan de Fuca oceanic plate and the North American continental plate. Tectonic plates move due to convection currents in the mantle, but movement in a different directions creates different possible margins. With the two plates moving towards each other, the oceanic plate in this case was being subducted beneath the continental because the oceanic is denser and heavier.
    [Show full text]
  • Plume Height, Volume, and Classification of Explosive Volcanic Eruptions Based on the Weibull Function
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by RERO DOC Digital Library Bull Volcanol (2013) 75:742 DOI 10.1007/s00445-013-0742-1 RESEARCH ARTICLE Plume height, volume, and classification of explosive volcanic eruptions based on the Weibull function Costanza Bonadonna & Antonio Costa Received: 30 January 2013 /Accepted: 10 June 2013 /Published online: 25 July 2013 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 Abstract The Weibull distribution between volume and volume of tephra deposits and the height of volcanic plumes square root of isopach area has been recently introduced for and for the classification of eruptive style. Nonetheless, due to determining volume of tephra deposits, which is crucial to the the typically large uncertainties (mainly due to availability of assessment of the magnitude and hazards of explosive volca- data, compilation of isopach and isopleth maps, and discrep- noes. We show how the decay of the size of the largest lithics ancies from empirical best fits), plume height, volume, and with the square root of isopleth area can also be well described magnitude of explosive eruptions cannot be considered as using a Weibull function and how plume height correlates absolute values, regardless of the technique used. It is impor- strongly with corresponding Weibull parameters. Variations tant that various empirical and analytical methods are applied of median grain size (Mdϕ) values with square root of area inordertoassesssuchanuncertainty. of the associated contours can be, similarly, well fitted with a Weibull function. Weibull parameters, derived for both the Keywords Tephra . Maximum clast . Mdϕ . Uncertainty . thinning of tephra deposits and the decrease of grain size (both Eruptive style .
    [Show full text]
  • Mystery' Eruption of 539/40 CE
    Quaternary Science Reviews 222 (2019) 105855 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quascirev Radiocarbon and geologic evidence reveal Ilopango volcano as source of the colossal ‘mystery’ eruption of 539/40 CE * Robert A. Dull a, b, , John R. Southon c, Steffen Kutterolf d, Kevin J. Anchukaitis e, Armin Freundt d, David B. Wahl f, g, Payson Sheets h, Paul Amaroli i, Walter Hernandez j, Michael C. Wiemann k, Clive Oppenheimer l a Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, California Lutheran University, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91360, USA b Environmental Science Institute, University of Texas, Austin, TX, 78712, USA c Department of Earth System Science, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA d GEOMAR, Helmholtz Center for Ocean Research, Wischhofstr. 1-3, D-24148, Kiel, Germany e School of Geography and Development and Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA f United States Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA g Department of Geography, University of California at Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA h Department of Anthropology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA i Fundacion Nacional de Arqueología de El Salvador, FUNDAR, San Salvador, El Salvador j Retired from Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, San Salvador, El Salvador k United States Department of Agriculture Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI, 53726, USA l Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Place, Cambridge, CB2 3EN, UK article info abstract Article history: Ilopango volcano (El Salvador) erupted violently during the Maya Classic Period (250e900 CE) in a Received 24 February 2019 densely-populated and intensively-cultivated region of the southern Maya realm, causing regional Received in revised form abandonment of an area covering more than 20,000 km2.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Influence of the AD1600 Eruptionofhuaynaputina,Peru
    letters to nature Supplementary Information is available on Nature’s World-Wide Web site (http://www.nature.com) or distributed predominantly to the west and north. Local proximal as paper copy from the London editorial office of Nature. pyroclastic flows and secondary mass flows were insignificant in Acknowledgements. The current development of the Northern Hemisphere densitometric network is volume. This large plinian eruption destroyed local communities funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (F.H.S.) and the European Community under ADVANCE-10K (K.R.B.). P.D.J. is supported by the US Department of Energy, and T.J.O. by NERC. with a loss of over 1,000 lives and caused considerable damage to the We thank E. Cook, T. Crowley, M. Free, V. Morgan, E. Mosley-Thompson, C. Newhall, F. Oldfield, A. major cities of Arequipa and Moquegua. The loss of farmland, Robock and S. Self for advice and data. crops, livestock, vineyards, and water resources compounded the Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to K.R.B. (e-mail: [email protected]). significant economic burden on this region. The whole socio- economic infrastructure of a large part of Peru, and maybe that of 8 Global influence of the AD1600 10000 0.23 km3 1000 eruptionofHuaynaputina,Peru 4.32 km3 100 (cm) T Shanaka L. de Silva* & Gregory A. Zielinski† 3 10 14.6 km * Department of Geography, Geology, and Anthropology, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, Indiana 47809, USA 15°S 1 0 200 400 600 800 † Climate Change Research Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham, √A (km) New Hampshire 03824-3525, USA 1 ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Source of the Great A.D. 1257 Mystery Eruption Unveiled, Samalas Volcano, Rinjani Volcanic Complex, Indonesia
    Source of the great A.D. 1257 mystery eruption unveiled, Samalas volcano, Rinjani Volcanic Complex, Indonesia Franck Lavignea,1, Jean-Philippe Degeaia,b, Jean-Christophe Komorowskic, Sébastien Guilletd, Vincent Roberta, Pierre Lahittee, Clive Oppenheimerf, Markus Stoffeld,g, Céline M. Vidalc, Suronoh, Indyo Pratomoi, Patrick Wassmera,j, Irka Hajdask, Danang Sri Hadmokol, and Edouard de Belizala aUniversité Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, Département de Géographie, and Laboratoire de Géographie Physique, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 8591, 92195 Meudon, France; bUniversité Montpellier 3 Paul Valéry and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5140, 34970 Lattes, France; cInstitut de Physique du Globe, Equipe Géologie des Systèmes Volcaniques, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7654, Sorbonne Paris-Cité, 75238 Paris Cedex 05, France; dInstitute of Geological Sciences, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; eDépartement des Sciences de la Terre (IDES), Université Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France; fDepartment of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EN, United Kingdom; gDepartment of Earth Sciences, Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Geneva, 1227 Carouge, Switzerland; hCenter for Volcanology and Geological Hazard Mitigation, Geological Agency, 40122 Bandung, Indonesia; iGeological Museum, Geological Agency, 40122 Bandung, Indonesia; jFaculté de Géographie et d’Aménagement, Université de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France; kLaboratory of Ion Beam Physics, Eidgenössiche Technische Hochschule, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland; and lFaculty of Geography, Department of Environmental Geography, Gadjah Mada University, Bulaksumur, 55281 Yogyakarta, Indonesia Edited by Ikuo Kushiro, University of Tokyo, Tsukuba, Japan, and approved September 4, 2013 (received for review April 21, 2013) Polar ice core records attest to a colossal volcanic eruption that northern hemisphere in A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • CATACLYSMIC ERUPTIONS the Really Big Ones!
    CATACLYSMIC ERUPTIONS The really big ones! This figure compares the size of some recent, well-known eruptions. Note how small the eruptions of Mount St. Helens and even Vesuvius are compared to Katmai, Krakatau and Tambora. Within the very recent geological past, there have been extremely violent explosive eruptions several orders of magnitude greater in size than any historical eruptions:- Date Volume Km3 Mount St Helens 1980 2 Pinatubo 1991 8 Krakatoa 1883 18 Santorini 1628 BC 39 Crater Lake 6845 BP 75 Long Valley 700,000 BP 600 Yellowstone 2 million BP 2500 1 These volcanoes have erupted vast volumes of rhyolite - dacite ash and pyroclastic flows. Some are still potentially active and could very well erupt again (Yellowstone, Long Valley, Rabaul, Pozzoli). Calderas • Calderas are large elliptical volcanic depressions (2 – 80 km in longest dimension). • They occur on all types of volcanoes • Almost all of the large silicic eruptions are associated with calderas. • Early debate on whether they were formed by explosions or collapse. 2 There are two basic types:- I. Volcanoes that have completely blown themselves apart, and then collapsed, leaving a huge crater in their place. Crater Lake, Oregon 75 km3 Santorini, Mediterranean 39 km3 Krakatau, Indonesia 20 km3 Classic interpretation of how “Crater Lake” type of calderas form (Williams, 1941). Initial plinian eruption (a,b) is followed by pyroclastic flows (c). Withdrawal of magma from magma chamber leaves volcano unsupported, resulting in collapse to form caldera (d). Subsequent volcanic activity occurs within the caldera (d,e). 3 Crater Lake (Mount Mazama) • Started life as a typical stratovolcano about 400 ka.
    [Show full text]