Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 05/19/2021 8:44:24 AM
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2020 Proclamation 10080
Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2020 Proclamation 10080—National Gang Violence Prevention Week, 2020 September 18, 2020 By the President of the United States of America A Proclamation During National Gang Violence Prevention Week, we reaffirm our unwavering commitment to ensuring gang members are removed from our streets and prosecuted for their crimes, so all Americans can live and thrive in a safe and peaceful environment. Our Nation's law enforcement officials are our first line of defense against gang violence, and we continue to express our eternal gratitude for their selfless devotion to upholding the rule of law and keeping us safe. Street gangs pose grave threats to the safety of communities and the well‐being of children, teenagers, and families. Gangs aim to perpetuate the trafficking and smuggling of humans, weapons, and drugs. They destroy public and private property, corrupt America's youth, and ruin businesses. To break the pernicious cycle of gang violence and crime, my Administration has enacted comprehensive solutions focused on prevention, intervention, and suppression. In July, we launched Operation LeGend—a sustained and coordinated law enforcement surge in communities across the Nation. Operation LeGend is named in honor of 4-year-old LeGend Taliferro, who was shot and killed while he peacefully slept early in the morning of June 29 in Kansas City, Missouri. This unfathomable tragedy is one of many examples of the scourge gangs pose to our youth and to our communities. The eponymous operation spans every Federal law enforcement agency and is being executed in conjunction with State and local officials. -
Was Trump's Deployment of Federal Officers to Portland, Oregon And
University of San Diego Digital USD Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses and Dissertations Spring 5-18-2021 Was Trump’s deployment of federal officerso t Portland, Oregon and other cities during the summer of 2020 legal and constitutional? Celina Tebor University of San Diego Follow this and additional works at: https://digital.sandiego.edu/honors_theses Part of the American Politics Commons Digital USD Citation Tebor, Celina, "Was Trump’s deployment of federal officerso t Portland, Oregon and other cities during the summer of 2020 legal and constitutional?" (2021). Undergraduate Honors Theses. 83. https://digital.sandiego.edu/honors_theses/83 This Undergraduate Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Digital USD. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital USD. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Honors Thesis Approval Page Student Name: Celina Tebor Title of Thesis: Was Trump’s deployment of federal officers to Portland, Oregon and other cities during the summer of 2020 legal and constitutional? Accepted by the Honors Program and faculty of the Department of Political Science, University of San Diego, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts. FACULTY APPROVAL _Del Dickson_______ ___Del Dickson______________ 5/14/21_ Faculty Project Advisor (Print) Signature Date Dr. Susannah Stern _______________________ __________________ Honors Program Director Signature Date Was Trump’s deployment of federal officers to Portland, Oregon and other cities during the summer of 2020 legal and constitutional? ___________________ A Thesis Presented to The Faculty and the Honors Program Of the University of San Diego ____________________ By Celina Buenafe Tebor Political Science & Communication Studies 2021 Tebor 1 I. -
Declaration of Daniel Stevens-Signed
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA DEVIN G. NUNES Plaintiff, v. Civil Case No. 1:19-cv-1148 FUSION GPS A/KA BEAN LLC, GLENN SIMPSON, and CAMPAIGN FOR ACCOUNTABILITY, INC. Defendants. DEFENDANT CAMPAIGN FOR ACCOUNTABILITY’S MOTION TO DISMISS Defendant Campaign for Accountability, by and through counsel, hereby respectfully moves this Court for an order dismissing the Complaint filed by Plaintiff Devin Nunes pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1), 12(b)(2), and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Complaint should be dismissed on the grounds that (1) the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because the Plaintiff does not have standing; (2) the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over Defendant CfA; and (3) the Complaint fails to state a plausible claim for relief under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962 and 1964, and fails to state a plausible claim for common law conspiracy. For the reasons above and those in the accompanying Memorandum of Law in Support of Campaign for Accountability’s Motion to Dismiss, Defendant respectfully requests that the Court grant this Motion, enter the attached Proposed Order dismissing the Complaint with prejudice, and award the Defendant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. Dated: November 22, 2019 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Kerry Brainard Verdi_________ Kerry Brainard Verdi Verdi & Ogletree PLLC 1325 G Street, NW Suite 500 Washington, DC 20005 Tel: (202) 449-7703 Fax: (202) 449-7701 [email protected] Counsel for Defendant Campaign for Accountability 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was served through the Court’s electronic filing system on November 22, 2019 to counsel of record. -
Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 115 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 115 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 164 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, MAY 7, 2018 No. 73 House of Representatives The House met at noon and was the campaign: Darrel Martin and Linda Black man since reconstruction per- called to order by the Speaker pro tem- Moore. A few years later, we worked haps ever. After one term, he ran for pore (Mr. THORNBERRY). very different parts of Virginia in mayor and lost handily. I still marvel f Jerry Baliles’ winning race for Gov- at the courage and the hope he must ernor. But my life changed completely have had to stand for office in Prince DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO when I visited Carl at his home in Edward County, alone among all the TEMPORE Farmville in the summer of 1988, at the counties in the United States to close The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- beginning of my first-ever candidacy its public schools rather than integrate fore the House the following commu- for office. them. One can only imagine the hos- nication from the Speaker: Carl agreed to join my small team, tility Carl faced in the local population as he dared to lead them. Twice more, WASHINGTON, DC, and from that day forward, he was my May 7, 2018. constant companion. We traveled ev- over the decades, Carl ran for mayor, I hereby appoint the Honorable MAC erywhere across the Commonwealth to- getting closer each time, and earning THORNBERRY to act as Speaker pro tempore gether. -
Struggle for Power: the Ongoing Persecution of Black Movement the by U.S
STRUGGLE FOR POWER T H E ONGOING PERSECUTION O F B L A C K M O V E M E N T BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT In the fight for Black self-determination, power, and freedom in the United States, one institution’s relentless determination to destroy Black movement is unrivaled— the United States federal government. Black resistance and power-building threaten the economic interests and white supremacist agenda that uphold the existing social order. Throughout history, when Black social movements attract the nation’s or world’s attention, or we fight our way onto the nation’s political agenda as we have today, we experience violent repression. We’re disparaged and persecuted; cast as villains in the story of American prosperity; and forced to defend ourselves and our communities against police, anti-Black policymakers, and U.S. armed forces. Last summer, on the heels of the murders of Breonna Taylor and George Floyd, millions of people mobilized to form the largest mass movement against police violence and racial injustice in U.S. history. Collective outrage spurred decentral- ized uprisings in defense of Black lives in all 50 states, with a demand to defund police and invest in Black communities. This brought global attention to aboli- tionist arguments that the only way to prevent deaths such as Mr. Floyd’s and Ms. Taylor’s is to take power and funding away from police. At the same time, the U.S federal government, in a flagrant abuse of power and at the express direction of disgraced former President Donald Trump and disgraced former Attorney General William Barr, deliberately targeted supporters of the movement to defend Black lives in order to disrupt and discourage the movement. -
President Trump Announces New Tariffs on $300 Billion in Chinese
# 1 Indian American Weekly: Since 2006 VOL 13 ISSUE 31 ● NEW YORK / DALLAS ● AUG 02 - 08 , 2019 ● ENQUIRIES: 646-247-9458 www.theindianpanorama.news President Trump Announces New Tariffs Invites articles and advertisements for India's Independence Day special edition. on $300 billion in Chinese Goods Articles may please be emailed to [email protected] by August 5, 2019. Stocks and oil prices plunge Advertising space may please be booked by August 4. Creative of the advertisement WASHINGTON (TIP): Escalating the / advertising matter for designing an trade war with China, President Donald advertisement may please be emailed to Trump said in a series of tweets on [email protected] by August 6. Thursday, August 1 that, starting Sept. 1, For any question, please the U.S. will impose a 10% tariff on $300 call 646-247-9458. billion in Chinese goods. There will be no edition of The immediate impact of the The Indian Panorama on announcement was that the financial August 9 in view of the markets, which had jumped in morning Indian Independence Day special edition on August 13, 2019. trade, fell into negative terrain immediately after Mr. Trump's tweets. The Dow went from a gain of 270 points Melinda Katz Wins Thursday to a loss of 180 points moments Recount in Queens DA after Mr. Trump tweeted his threat - a swing of more than 450 points. It closed Primary the day down 280 points, or 1%, to 26,583. The broader S&P 500 stock index and President Trump Melinda Katz has accused China called upon tech-heavy Nasdaq composite also slid of reneging on its all to join her on the tweet. -
UN Special Rapporteur Aug. 8 2020
September 10, 2020 Via E-mail Mr. Clément Nyaletsossi Voule Special Rapporteur on the Rights to Freedom of Assembly and of Association Palais des Nations, CH-1211 Geneva 10 Switzerland [email protected] [email protected] Re: Human Rights Violations against Peaceful Protesters Dear Mr. Voule: On behalf of Access Now and the University of Southern California Gould School of Law’s International Human Rights Clinic (USC IHRC), with the support of the international law firm Foley Hoag LLP, we are writing to call your attention to the intensifying human rights violations committed by the United States Government against peaceful demonstrators in the United States. Access Now is a non-governmental organization that works to defend the digital rights of users at risk around the world through policy, advocacy, and technology support, grants, and convenings like RightsCon. The USC IHRC engages in advocacy projects to confront some of the most pressing human rights concerns in the U.S. and globally. I. Introduction Over the past few months, the United States Government has responded to peaceful demonstrations by deploying militarized police forces into communities without State or local official invitation or authorization. These forces have arbitrarily detained protesters in unarmed vehicles and generally suppressed the freedoms of expression, press, and assembly in major U.S. cities. Such conduct by federal officials implicate major human rights obligations, including the rights of: freedom of expression, press, and access to information;1 1 See International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Article 1; Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 19. -
Trump Administration Allies Have Burrowed Into 24 Critical Civil Service Positions and 187 Last-Minute Appointments
Trump Administration Allies Have Burrowed Into 24 Critical Civil Service Positions And 187 Last-Minute Appointments SUMMARY: Following the outgoing administration’s “quiet push to salt federal agencies with Trump loyalists,” an Accountable.US review has found that, as of February 22, 2021, at least 24 Trump administration political appointees have “burrowed” into long-term civil service jobs in the new Biden administration. This includes at least four figures in the national security apparatus, nine figures with environmental regulators, three figures in the Department of Justice, two figures in the embattled Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and at least six other appointees elsewhere who have refused to step down in the transition. Burrowing of this sort is not treated lightly, as officials who transfer from political appointments to career positions must undergo scrutiny by federal personnel overseers for a full five years—and some of these cases have been found to violate federal laws and have drawn congressional scrutiny. However, there is a much wider slate of concerning Trump administration appointments that are not subject to such strict oversight: During the Trump administration’s waning days following the 2020 election, it announced 187 last-minute appointments to various boards, commissions, and councils that don’t require Senate confirmation. While some of these appointments have already drawn alarm for going to campaign staffers, megadonors, and top administration allies, Accountable.US has unearthed even more troubling names in Trump’s outgoing deluge. Similar to how early Trump administration personnel picks were directly conflicted against the offices they served, many of these late Trump appointments are woefully underqualified or have histories directly at odds with the positions to which they were named—and they are likely to stay in long into the Biden administration. -
Download Report
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON 1 The case for the impeachment of Attorney General Bill Barr Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) has previously called on the United States House of Representatives to initiate a formal impeachment inquiry into Attorney General William Barr. Today, CREW outlines the contours of that inquiry, which should assess whether Attorney General Barr abused the powers of his office by engaging in a course of conduct that impaired the Special Counsel investigation of President Trump, the conduct of lawful inquiries by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and the purpose of that agency, and the oversight and impeachment powers of the United States House of Representatives. These actions violate DOJ’s founding principal to maintain the independence and impartiality of federal prosecutions from political intervention. The inquiry should also assess whether Barr directed federal law enforcement officers to violate the First and Fourth Amendment rights of American citizens who gathered to engage in peaceful protest outside of the White House and across the United States. Article I of the U.S. Constitution vests the House of Representatives with the power to impeach a federal official for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” and the Senate with the power to try all impeachments and convict if it deems that individual’s removal from office both merited and wise. The term “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” refers to serious abuses of official power (Sunstein at 36-37). As Alexander Hamilton explained in Federalist 65, impeachment proceedings are reserved for “offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust.” Cabinet officials have faced impeachment proceedings for such abuses of power, including the 1876 impeachment of Secretary of War William Bellknap and the impeachment inquiry of Secretary of the Treasury Andrew Mellon, which was abandoned after his resignation in 1932. -
GEORGE FLOYD / BREONNA TAYLOR ESSAYS by Julius Wachtel
GEORGE FLOYD / BREONNA TAYLOR ESSAYS by Julius Wachtel As originally published in POLICEISSUES.ORG (c) 2007-2021 Julius Wachtel Permission to reproduce in part or in whole granted for non-commercial purposes only POLICEISSUES.ORG Posted 5/17/21 IS THE “CURE” WORSE THAN THE “DISEASE”? Dem’s push the “George Floyd Justice in Policing Act.” Its consequences could be profound. For Police Issues by Julius (Jay) Wachtel. On June 8, 2020, a mere twelve days after those punishing “nine minutes and twenty-nine seconds” took George Floyd’s life, the 116th. Congress introduced the “George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2020.” Seventeen days later, on June 25, the House approved the measure by a comfortable 236-181 margin. Only three Republicans, though, voted in its favor. And the Senate, then a province of the “Reds,” simply refused to take it up. Hoping for a better outcome, the Dem’s reintroduced the legislation in the 117th. Congress. On March 3rd., reflecting their eroded standing, the “George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2021” passed the lower chamber on a far less decisive 220-212 vote. It now awaits action by the evenly-divided Senate. Here are some of its key provisions (for the text version click here; for a summary click here.) · As Federal law (18 USC 242) presently stands, police officers can only be prosecuted for “willful” civil rights violations, meaning done on purpose and with bad intent. The George Floyd Act would relax this standard to include behavior that was “knowing” – meaning, not by accident – or “reckless.” Should death result, present penalty enhancements would be extended to include situations where officer conduct was a “substantial” contributing factor to the fatality, not only its sole or primary cause. -
Congressional Record—Senate S5627
September 16, 2020 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S5627 their ability to pay their bills and to week—merely a month before election ceiving information from the par- receive medications, and that small day. There is a dark similarity here to ticular Russian agent that I have men- businesses are not able to complete the Republican effort in the House in tioned, Mr. Derkach, but Chairman their transactions. Congress has a re- the previous election to discredit the JOHNSON has never provided a full ac- sponsibility to enact legislation that Democratic Presidential candidate counting of all the Russian- and will restore timely delivery and fully with the Select Committee on Ukrainian-linked individuals he sought fund the Postal Service. Benghazi. information from. One of the chair- Finally, we need to ensure that the You may remember the now-minor- man’s subpoenas, for example, targeted Census Bureau has the time necessary ity leader of the House Republican cau- a Ukrainian national who is an asso- to execute a complete and accurate cus bragging that the Republicans cre- ciate of Mr. Derkach. 2020 count. You know, it has been in- ated the committee to bring down Hil- So anticipating his objection to this teresting to me to see the efforts of lary’s poll numbers. You know what resolution, I would simply ask the this administration to try and politi- they say about a political gaffe: It is chairman to provide a full accounting cize the census, because this is no red when politicians tell the truth. of whom he sought information from, State or blue State problem. -
President's Commission on Law Enforcement
U.S. Department of Justice President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice Final Report December 2020 Suggested citation: Executive Office of the President of the United States, Report of the President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice (Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President of the United States, 2020). Although the Commission which prepared this Report was subject to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (“FACA”), 5 U.S.C. app. 2, a United States District Court judge has found that the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the Commission’s officers violated FACA in forming and operating the Commission. In particular, DOJ and the Commission did not comply with FACA’s requirements to ensure the Commission’s membership is fairly balanced in terms of the points of view represented, file a charter, select a designated federal officer, or provide timely notice of meetings in the Federal Register. For additional detail, the remedial order of the United States District Court that issued this decision is attached to the Commission’s Report. U.S. Department of Justice President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice Final Report December 2020 Photography: United States Department of Justice Unless Otherwise Labeled CONTENTS From the Attorney General ...............................................................................................................................iii From the Commission Chair ............................................................................................................................