National Priorities
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Central African Republic Overview of Bilateral, Regional, Multilateral, and Global Programs Overview of U.S
Meeting the Fast Start Commitment U.S. Climate Finance in Fiscal Year 2011 Central African Republic Overview of Bilateral, Regional, Multilateral, and Global Programs Overview of U.S. Fast Start Climate Financing in Fiscal Years 2010 & 2011 n December 2009, President Obama and contribution to fast start financing will also leaders from around the world came include funding from FY 2012. together in Copenhagen at the 15th Consistent with President Obama’s Global IConference of the Parties to the United Nations Development Policy, we are using the full range Framework Convention on Climate Change of mechanisms – bilateral, multilateral, and (UNFCCC) to chart a new course in the global private – to ensure that our climate finance is effort to tackle climate change. The resulting efficient, effective, and innovative; based on Copenhagen Accord reflected - for the first country-owned plans; and focused on achieving time in an international outcome - measurable, measurable results. We are focusing our bilateral reportable and verifiable mitigation targets and efforts on those countries and regions where actions by all major economies, and set out we have a comparative advantage and are new institutions and approaches for adaptation, coordinating closely with other donors. U.S. fast technology and finance. start finance is provided to developing countries The finance outcomes in Copenhagen included through a variety of channels, including: a collective commitment by developed countries Q Congressionally appropriated climate to provide resources to developing countries finance: grant-based assistance through approaching $30 billion in the period 2010- the Global Climate Change Initiative – a 2012. The elements that leaders endorsed in the whole-of-government effort to promote low Copenhagen Accord, including this “fast start” emission, climate resilient economic growth finance commitment, were carried forward in around the world – and additional grant- decisions of the 16th Conference of the Parties in based assistance that delivers significant Cancun in December 2010. -
Methane Emissions from Landfills
Methane Emissions from Landfills Haokai Zhao Advisors: Prof. Nickolas J. Themelis Prof. A.C. (Thanos) Bourtsalas Prof. Wade R. McGillis Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering Fu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science Columbia University January, 2019 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for M.S. in Earth and Environmental Engineering Research co-sponsored by Methane Emissions from Landfills H. Zhao Executive Summary Methane, one of the main greenhouse gases (GHGs), has been assessed to have 28 times the global warming potential (GWP) of carbon dioxide over a 100-year time horizon in the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). In municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills, methane is generated as a product of the anaerobic degradation of organic waste. United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) estimated that, in 2016, landfill methane emissions in the U.S. were approximately 107.7 million tons carbon dioxide equivalent (Mt CO2 e). And globally, it was estimated that methane emissions from landfilling of solid waste were 794.0 million tons of CO2 e in 2005. At both the U.S. and the global levels, landfilling was the third largest source of methane emissions, after enteric fermentation and natural gas & oil systems. A broad range of topics about methane emissions from landfill are covered in this report, including the gas-generating processes in landfill, the theories about modeling landfill gas generation and emission, the developed models and the current estimates of landfill emissions, as well as the calculation and analysis on several aspects: 1) theoretical maximum methane generation per ton of MSW and actual methane emission per ton of MSW; 2) climate zone statistics about landfill gas generation model parameter, landfill methane generation, emission and recovery; 3) the time series of global landfill methane emissions with regional analysis and per capita analysis. -
Survey Guide Notes 2017
COASTWATCH SURVEY GUIDE NOTES The Coastwatch Survey 2017 is taking place from the Black sea to the Baltic and the Mediterranean to the Atlantic. This is the 30th anniversary of the survey which was started on the island of Ireland in 1987 and went international in 1988. It involves walking a chosen survey unit of sea shore (500m) once around low tide, eyes peeled for lots of information set out in the survey questionnaire and noting down your observations. Water quality tests may be used. Individual snapshot surveys are combined like a jigsaw of our shore in autumn 2017. Much of this citizen science work can be compared with or used to augment official data to better monitor our shores and seas and take action where needed. A survey unit (s.u. for short) is a stretch of shore approx. 500 m long as measured along mean high tide mark. On the Coastwatch map online it’s any one of the blue or white sections you see along the coast. If you click on one the colour changes to red and the unique survey unit code pops up. Spring (extreme) high-tide HINTERLAND Normal high-tide (MHWM) SPLASH Normal low-tide (MLWM) ZONE INTERTIDAL The width covers the sea shore from start of hinterland (dry land) down to shallow water when the tide is out. The intertidal may be over a kilometre in tidal estuaries with sand and mudflats, or reduced to a narrow strip along steeply sloping shores. In spring tides on a full and new moon it is widest. -
Appendix 1 : Marine Habitat Types Definitions. Update Of
Appendix 1 Marine Habitat types definitions. Update of “Interpretation Manual of European Union Habitats” COASTAL AND HALOPHYTIC HABITATS Open sea and tidal areas 1110 Sandbanks which are slightly covered by sea water all the time PAL.CLASS.: 11.125, 11.22, 11.31 1. Definition: Sandbanks are elevated, elongated, rounded or irregular topographic features, permanently submerged and predominantly surrounded by deeper water. They consist mainly of sandy sediments, but larger grain sizes, including boulders and cobbles, or smaller grain sizes including mud may also be present on a sandbank. Banks where sandy sediments occur in a layer over hard substrata are classed as sandbanks if the associated biota are dependent on the sand rather than on the underlying hard substrata. “Slightly covered by sea water all the time” means that above a sandbank the water depth is seldom more than 20 m below chart datum. Sandbanks can, however, extend beneath 20 m below chart datum. It can, therefore, be appropriate to include in designations such areas where they are part of the feature and host its biological assemblages. 2. Characteristic animal and plant species 2.1. Vegetation: North Atlantic including North Sea: Zostera sp., free living species of the Corallinaceae family. On many sandbanks macrophytes do not occur. Central Atlantic Islands (Macaronesian Islands): Cymodocea nodosa and Zostera noltii. On many sandbanks free living species of Corallinaceae are conspicuous elements of biotic assemblages, with relevant role as feeding and nursery grounds for invertebrates and fish. On many sandbanks macrophytes do not occur. Baltic Sea: Zostera sp., Potamogeton spp., Ruppia spp., Tolypella nidifica, Zannichellia spp., carophytes. -
Steckbriefe Und Kartierhinweise Für FFH-Lebensraumtypen
Steckbriefe und Kartierhinweise für FFH-Lebensraumtypen 1. Fassung, Mai 2007 Landesamt für Natur und Umwelt des Landes Schleswig-Holstein LANU Schleswig-Holstein Steckbriefe und Kartierhinweise für FFH-Lebensraumtypen 1. Fassung Mai 2007 EU-Code 1140 Kurzbezeichnung Watten FFH-Richtlinie 1997 Vegetationsfreies Schlick-, Sand- und Mischwatt BFN 1998 Vegetationsfreies Schlick-, Sand- und Mischwatt Interpretation Manual Mudflats and sandflats not covered by seawater at low tide Sands and muds of the coasts of the oceans, their connected seas and as- sociated lagoons, not covered by sea water at low tide, devoid of vascular plants, usually coated by blue algae and diatoms. They are of particular importance as feeding grounds for wildfowl and waders. The diverse inter- tidal communities of invertebrates and algae that occupy them can be used to define subdivisions of 11.27, eelgrass communities that may be exposed for a few hours in the course of every tide have been listed under 11.3, brackish water vegetation of permanent pools by use of those of 11.4. Note: Eelgrass communities (11.3) are included in this habitat type. Beschreibung Sand- und Schlickflächen, die im Küsten- und Brackwasserbereich von Nord- und Ostsee und in angrenzenden Meeresarmen, Strandseen und Salzwiesen bei LAT / lowest astronomical tide (Tidewatten der Nord- see) oder mittlerem Witterungsverlauf (Windwatten der Ostsee) regel- mäßig trocken fallen. Typische Arten Höhere Pflanzen : Eleocharis parvula (Schlei), Oenanthe conioides (Elbe), Ruppia cirrhosa, Ruppia maritima, Zostera marina, Zostera noltii Algen : div. Blau- und Kieselalgen Außerdem Windwatten z. T. mit Armleuchteralgen (Characeae), anderen Makroalgen Typische Vegetation > Zosteretum noltii HARMSEN 1936 > Zosteretum marinae B ORGESEN ex VAN GOOR 1921 > Ruppion maritimae B R.-B L. -
Greenhouse Gas Inventory South Africa
GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY SOUTH 1990 TO AFRICA 2000 COMPILATION UNDER THE NATIONAL UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE (UNFCCC) INVENTORY REPORT MAY 2009 Greenhouse gas inventory South Africa PREFACE This report is the result of work commissioned by the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT) to develop the 2000 national inventory of greenhouse gases (GHGs) for South Africa. Information on energy and industrial processes was prepared by the Energy Research Centre (ERC) of the University of Cape Town, while information on agriculture, land use changes, forestry and waste was provided by the Centre for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR). This report is published by the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, South Africa. An electronic version of the report, along with the Common Reporting Format (CRF) tables, is available on the website of DEAT: http://www.saaqis.org.za/. Information from this report may be reproduced, provided the source is acknowledged. AUTHORS AND CONTRIBUTORS General responsibility: Stanford Mwakasonda (ERC), Rina Taviv (CSIR), Peter Lukey (DEAT) Jongikhaya Witi (DEAT),argot Richardson (DEAT), Tsietsi Mahema (DEAT), Ajay Trikam (ERC). Individual chapters: Summary Stanford Mwakasonda Chapter 1 Stanford Mwakasonda, Stephen Davies (Section 1.5) Chapter 2 Stanford Mwakasonda Chapter 3. Stanford Mwakasonda, Thapelo Letete, Philip Lloyd (section 3.2.1) Chapter 4 Stanford Mwakasonda, Thapelo Letete, Mondli Guma Chapter 5 Rina Taviv, Heidi van Deventer, Bongani Majeke, Sally Archibald Chapter 6 Ndeke Musee Report reviews: Harald Winkler, Marna van der Merwe, Bob Scholes Report compilation: Stanford Mwakasonda, Ajay Trikam Language editor: Robert Berold Quality assurance: TBA i Greenhouse gas inventory South Africa SUMMARY SOUTH AFRICA’S GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORIES In August 1997 the Republic of South Africa joined the majority of countries in the international community in ratifying the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). -
Survey Guide Notes (2019)
COASTWATCH SURVEY GUIDE NOTES 2019 The Coastwatch Survey 2019 is taking place from the Baltic and the Mediterranean to the Atlantic. This is the 32nd anniversary of the survey which was started on the island of Ireland in 1987. It was tried internationally in 1988 and carried out as a first proper international survey in 1989. It involves walking a chosen survey unit of sea shore (500m) once around low tide, eyes peeled for lots of information set out in the survey questionnaire and noting down your observations. Water quality tests may be used. Individual snapshot surveys are then put together like a huge jigsaw of our shore. Much of this citizen science work can be compared with or used to augment official data to better monitor our shores and seas and take action where needed. A survey unit (s.u. for short) is a stretch of shore approx. 500 m long, as measured along mean high tide mark. On the Coastwatch map online it’s any one of the blue or white sections you see along the coast. If you click on one, the colour changes to turquoise and the unique survey unit code pops up. That is the code for your survey form question A1. Spring (extreme) high-tide HINTERLAND Normal high-tide (MHWM) SPLASH Normal low-tide (MLWM) ZONE INTERTIDAL The width covers the sea shore from Spring High Tide Mark (= start of hinterland) down to shallow water when the tide is fully out. The intertidal may be over a kilometre in estuaries with sand and mudflats, or reduced to a narrow strip along steeply sloping shores or a wall. -
Characterizing Methane (CH4) Emissions in Urban Environments (Paris) Sara Defratyka
Characterizing methane (CH4) emissions in urban environments (Paris) Sara Defratyka To cite this version: Sara Defratyka. Characterizing methane (CH4) emissions in urban environments (Paris). Other. Université Paris-Saclay, 2021. English. NNT : 2021UPASJ002. tel-03230140 HAL Id: tel-03230140 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-03230140 Submitted on 19 May 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Characterization of CH4 emissions in urban environments (Paris) Caractérisation des émissions de CH4 en milieu urbain (Paris) Thèse de doctorat de l'université Paris-Saclay École doctorale n° 129 Sciences de l’environnement d’Ile-de-France (SEIF) Spécialité de doctorat: météorologie, océanographie, physique de l’environnement Unité de recherche : Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, CEA, UVSQ, Laboratoire des sciences du climat et de l’environnement Référent : Université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines Thèse présentée et soutenue à Paris-Saclay, le 19/01/2021, par Sara DEFRATYKA Composition du Jury Valéry CATOIRE Professeur des universités, -
A Full Greenhouse Gases Budget of Africa: Synthesis, Uncertainties, and Vulnerabilities
Biogeosciences, 11, 381–407, 2014 Open Access www.biogeosciences.net/11/381/2014/ doi:10.5194/bg-11-381-2014 Biogeosciences © Author(s) 2014. CC Attribution 3.0 License. A full greenhouse gases budget of Africa: synthesis, uncertainties, and vulnerabilities R. Valentini1,2, A. Arneth3, A. Bombelli2, S. Castaldi2,4, R. Cazzolla Gatti1, F. Chevallier5, P. Ciais5, E. Grieco2, J. Hartmann6, M. Henry7, R. A. Houghton8, M. Jung9, W. L. Kutsch10, Y. Malhi11, E. Mayorga12, L. Merbold13, G. Murray-Tortarolo15, D. Papale1, P. Peylin5, B. Poulter5, P. A. Raymond14, M. Santini2, S. Sitch15, G. Vaglio Laurin2,16, G. R. van der Werf17, C. A. Williams18, and R. J. Scholes19 1Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest systems (DIBAF), University of Tuscia, via S. Camillo de Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, Italy 2Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change (CMCC), Via Augusto Imperatore 16, 73100 Lecce, Italy 3Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Atmospheric Environmental Research, Kreuzeckbahn Str. 19, 82467 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany 4Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali, Biologiche e Farmaceutiche (DISTABIF), Seconda Università di Napoli, via Vivaldi 43, 81100 Caserta, Italy 5LSCE, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, L’Orme des Merisiers, Bat 701, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France 6Institute for Biogeochemistry and Marine Chemistry, 20146, Hamburg, Germany 7FAO, Forestry Department, UN-REDD Programme, Viale delle terme di Caracalla 1, 00153 Rome, Italy 8Woods Hole Research Center, 149 Woods Hole Road, Falmouth, MA 02540, -
Luminescence Dating of Coastal Sediments from the Baltic Sea Coastal Barrier-Spit Darss–Zingst, NE Germany
Geomorphology 122 (2010) 264–273 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Geomorphology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/geomorph Luminescence dating of coastal sediments from the Baltic Sea coastal barrier-spit Darss–Zingst, NE Germany Tony Reimann a,⁎, Michael Naumann b,c, Sumiko Tsukamoto a, Manfred Frechen a a Leibniz Institute for Applied Geophysics (LIAG-Institute), Section S3: Geochronology and Isotope Hydrology, Stilleweg 2, 30655 Hannover, Germany b Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Department for Marine Geology, Warnemünde, Germany c Institute of Geography and Geology, Greifswald University, Greifswald, Germany article info abstract Article history: This study presents the first optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating application of young Holocene Accepted 1 March 2010 sediments from the coastal environment along the German Baltic Sea at the barrier-spit Darss–Zingst Available online 6 March 2010 (NE Germany). Fifteen samples were taken in Zingst–Osterwald and Windwatt from beach ridges to reconstruct the development of the Zingst spit system and separate phases of sediment mobilisation. The Keywords: single-aliquot regenerative-dose (SAR) protocol was applied to coarse grain quartz for OSL dating. The Chronology reliability of OSL data was tested with laboratory experiments including dose recovery, recycling ratio and OSL dating recuperation as well as the stratigraphy. We conclude that the sediment is suitable for OSL measurements Quartz Coastal evolution and the derived ages are internally consistent as well as in agreement with the existing stratigraphy and the Baltic Sea geological models of sediment aggradation. The beach ridges at Zingst–Osterwald aggregated ∼1900 to Coastal sediments ∼1600 years ago before the alteration of the sediment system related to the late Subatlantic transgression and the closing of the coastal inlets. -
Methane Emissions in the United States: Sources, Solutions & Opportunities for Reductions
Methane Emissions in the United States: Sources, Solutions & Opportunities for Reductions May 23, 2019 Presentation Overview • U.S. methane emissions & sources • Why methane matters • Methane mitigation by emission source • Spotlight on Renewable Natural Gas • Helpful tools and resources 2 U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emission Sources Source: Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2017 3 2017 U.S. Methane Emissions, by Source Other Coal Mining 38.3 MMTCO2e 55.7 MMTCO2e Coal Mining 8% Wastewater Treatment 14.2 MMTCO2e Oil and Natural Gas Systems 31% Landfills 107.7 MMTCO2e Oil and Natural Total Methane Gas Systems Agriculture 36% Emissions 203.3 MMTCO2e 656.3 MMTCO2e Waste 19% Enteric Fermentation Other 6% 175.4 MMTCO2e Manure Management 61.7 MMTCO2e Source: Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2017 4 Why Methane Matters Positive Outcomes of Capturing and Using Methane Methane Emissions Better air and water quality Trap 28 times more Methane Mitigation heat than carbon dioxide over 100 years Improved human health Opportunity to capture Contribute to ground- and convert methane Increased worker safety level ozone pollution to useful energy Enhanced energy security Create industrial safety problem Economic growth Reduced odors 5 Methane Mitigation by Emission Source • Coal Mines • Oil and Natural Gas Systems • Agriculture (Manure Management and Enteric Fermentation) • Waste (Wastewater Treatment and Landfills) 6 8% 55.7 MMTCO2e Coal Mines Total 656.3 Methane is released from MMTCO2e coal and surrounding rock ▪ Coal strata due to mining activities. In abandoned mines and surface mines, methane might also escape to the atmosphere through natural fissures or other diffuse sources. -
Global Trends of Methane Emissions and Their Impacts on Ozone Concentrations
Global trends of methane emissions and their impacts on ozone concentrations Van Dingenen, R., Crippa, M., Maenhout, G., Guizzardi, D., Dentener, F. 2018 EUR 29394 EN This publication is a Science for Policy report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. Contact information Name: R. Van Dingenen Address: European Commission, Joint Research Centre, via E. Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra, ITALY Email: [email protected] JRC Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRC113210 EUR 29394 EN PDF ISBN 978-92-79-96550-0 ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2760/820175 Print ISBN 978-92-79-96551-7 ISSN 1018-5593 doi:10.2760/73788 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Commission, 2018 © European Union, 2018 The reuse policy of the European Commission is implemented by Commission Decision 2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). Reuse is authorised, provided the source of the document is acknowledged and its original meaning or message is not distorted. The European Commission shall not be liable for any consequence stemming from the reuse. For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not owned by the EU, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders.