DOCSLIB.ORG

Usefulness of the Harmonic Scalpel in Thyroid Surgery

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Usefulness of the Harmonic Scalpel in Thyroid Surgery ORIGINAL ISSN: 2005-162X J Korean Thyroid Assoc 2012 November 5(2): 138-142 ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/10.11106/jkta.2012.5.2.138 Usefulness of the Harmonic Scalpel in Thyroid Surgery Hwan Choe, Kwang-Yoon Jung, Soon-Young Kwon, Jeong-Soo Woo, Min Woo Park and Seung-Kuk Baek Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Background and Objectives: The harmonic scalpel using the ultrasonic energy is able to grasp and divide tissue while sealing small vessels in narrow operating fields. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of the harmonic scalpel in thyroid surgery. Materials and Methods: This study was performed for 247 patients who underwent thyroidectomy. According to the use of harmonic Scalpel, the patients could be divided into two groups: the conventional technique (CT) group of knot tying and the harmonic scalpel (HS) group. Results: For hemithyroidectomy, operation time and hospital stay were shorter in the HS group compared with the CT group (p＜0.05). For total thyroidectomy with central neck dissection (CND), operation time, total drainage volume, drain removal date, and hospital stay were significantly reduced in the HS group (p＜0.05). Among the patients who underwent total thyroidectomy with CND with the HS, one patient (2.9%) showed transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. Transient hypoparathyroidism showed significantly lower incidence in the HS group (p＜0.05). Conclusion: HS might be cost-effective by reducing operation time and hospital stay without increased postoperative complications. Key Words: Thyroidectomy, Harmonic scalpel The ultrasonically activated scalpel (harmonic scalpel) Introduction that uses high frequency mechanical energy makes it possible to cut and coagulate tissues and vessels The standardized thyroid surgery developed by simultaneously, without the need of knot tying.4) Theodor Kocher and Theodor Billroth, the pioneers of Therefore, this device might be useful to reduce thyroid surgery, has not undergone a major change operation time and hypoparathyroidism since in thyroid in operative technique in the last century.1) Even if surgery that requires a large amount of knot tying and alternative surgical methods in thyroid gland, including may impair the pedicle of parathyroid gland during endoscopic surgery or recurrent laryngeal nerve knot tying. stimulation, have been tried during the last decade, they The present study was conducted to evaluate the have not been widely accepted.2,3) Recently, there was strength and weakness of the harmonic scalpel by a major development in the device using ultrasonic comparing two groups that used the conventional energy and it has been using for various surgeries, technique (knot tying) and the harmonic scalpel in especially by laparoscopists. thyroid surgery. Received September 27, 2012 / Revised October 10, 2012 / Accepted October 16, 2012 Correspondence: Seung-Kuk Baek, MD, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, 126-1 Anam-dong 5-ga, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 136-705, Korea Tel: 82-2-920-5486, Fax: 82-2-925-5233, E-mail: [email protected] Copyright ⓒ 2012, the Korean Thyroid Association. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http:// creative- commons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 138 Usefulness of the Harmonic Scalpel in Thyroid Surgery hypoparathyroidism was classified as transient, and in Materials and Methods the other cases, it was classified as permanent. Study design Surgical technique We performed the hemithyroidectomy and total All patients had the same anesthetic and hospital thyroidectomy in 286 patients with thyroid benign and care and the patients were positioned and draped in malignant nodules, from January 2006 to June 2007. the conventional manner. About 5 cm incision was Among them, thirty-nine patients who were asso- made over the level of the thyroid isthmus. After ciated with toxic goiter and who underwent complete elevation of subplastysmal flaps, the strap muscles thyroidectomy or total thyroidectomy with lateral neck were separated in the midline and laterally reflected. dissection were excluded. Thus, a total of 247 patients The superior and inferior thyroid vessels were then were included in the study population. Institutional divided either with the harmonic scalpel with the ethical board approval and preoperative informed CS-14C handpiece (Harmonic Synergy Curved consent from all patients were obtained. All patients Blade, Ethicon Endosurgery Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA) were explained in the price and functions of harmonic or with conventional knot tying and electric cauteri- scalpel and then harmonic scalpel was used only in zation. The only small vessels in the ligament of Berry patients with permission to use it. were clamped with clips in both groups. After that, the According to the use of harmonic scalpel, the wound was irrigated and closed using absorbable patients could be divided into two groups, prospec- suture material to approximate strap muscle, platysmal tively: the conventional technique (CT) group of tying layer, and subcutaneous layer. Then, the skin was and knots (hemithyroidectomy, n=100; total thyroi- sutured with non-absorbable material. dectomy, n=52) and the harmonic scalpel (HS) group The indications of hemithyroidectomy were benign (hemithyroidectomy, n=60; total thyroidectomy, n=35). nodule and single micropapillary carcinoma (1 cm and All patients were examined about age, gender, less) without nodal metastasis or extrathyroid spread. operation time, postoperative drainage (duration and In the other malignant nodule, total thyroidectomy with volume), hospital stay, and postoperative complication central neck dissection (level VI) was performed. including bleeding, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, Statistical analysis and hypoparathyroidism. Operation time was defined as the time between skin incision and skin closure. Hemithyroidectomy and total thyroidectomy groups Vacuum drains were placed in all patients, and were divided into two groups using either the HS or postoperative drainage was estimated every morning. conventional knot tying. All the patients who were to When the drainage volume was less than 20 mL per undergo surgery during the study period were selected 24 hours, the suction device was removed. All using simple random sampling. Each group was patients who were removed suction device were analyzed to estimate the usefulness of HS. Statistical discharged from the hospital the next day. In the analysis was performed using the independent t-test, patients who underwent total thyroidectomy, a series the Pearson χ2 test, and Fisher’s exact test to of serum calcium levels were obtained every post- compare the series. For all tests, a probability of less operative day until patients were discharged. All the than 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. All patients with serum calcium levels of less than 2.10 statistical analyses were done with SPSS software mmol/L (reference range, 2.10-2.60 mmol/L) during version 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). the first 3 postoperative days were considered as having hypocalcemia and received oral calcium Results carbonate and vitamin D3 supplementation. If serum calcium levels returned to normal within 6 months, All groups were similar regarding age and sex, and 139 J Korean Thyroid Assoc Hwan Choe, et al there were no intraoperative complications. For hemi- difference according to tumor volume and malignancy thyroidectomy, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. according to drainage volume and drain removal date In terms of postoperative complication, postoperative between the 2 groups. However, operation time (p= hemorrhage and transient recurrent laryngeal nerve 0.006) and hospital stay date (p=0.048) were shorter palsy occurred in one patient each (1%) who under- in the HS group compared with the CT group (Table 1). went hemithyroidectomy with the CT. Among the For total thyroidectomy with central neck dissection, patients who underwent total thyroidectomy with central there was no difference of drainage volume of first neck dissection (CND) with the HS, only one patient postoperative day between the 2 groups. However, (2.9%) showed transient recurrent laryngeal nerve operation time (p＜0.001), total drainage volume (p＜ palsy. The incidences of these complications were too 0.001), drain removal date (p=0.007), and hospital low to reach statistical significance, with the exception stay date (p＜0.001) were significantly different of transient hypoparathyroidism that showed significantly between them (Table 2). There was no significant Table 2. Difference between harmonic scalpel group and Table 1. Difference between harmonic scalpel group and conventional technique group according to clinical factors in conventional technique group according to clinical factors in patients who underwent total thyroidectomy with central neck patients who underwent the hemithyroidectomy dissection Hemithroidectomy Total thyroidectomy with CND Clinical factors (n=160) p Clinical factors (n=87) p HS (n=60) CT (n=100) HS (n=35) CT (n=52) Age 50.6±13.2 50.4±13.2 0.927* Age 48.1±14.2 45.3±14.2 0.371* † Gender 0.434 Gender 0.386† Female 44 80 Female 27 44 Male 16 20 Male 8 8 Operation time 85.0±27.6 98.4±30.9 0.006* Operation time 110.3±20.1 148.4±31.9 ＜0.001* Drainage volume Drainage volume POD 1st 32.0±13.9 32.2±13.6 0.974* POD 1st 39.0±10.7 35.7±28.4 0.445* Total volume 69.9±28.3 71.8±38.1 0.734* Total volume 84.3±22.1 123.7±67.5 ＜0.001* POD of 3.02±0.83 3.08±0.84 0.643* POD of 3.5±0.8 4.0±0.8 0.007* drain removal drain removal Hospital stay date 3.92±0.67 4.16±0.86 0.048* Hospital stay date 4.4±0.7 5.5±1.2 ＜0.001* CT: conventional technique, HS: harmonic scalpel, POD: CND: central neck dissection, CT: conventional technique, † postoperative day.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cleaning, Disinfection and Sterilization Guide
    CLEANING, DISINFECTION AND STERILIZATION GUIDE Revision 5.2 Copyright 2016, Brainlab AG Germany. All rights reserved. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL INFORMATION...................................................................................................7 Contact Data and Legal Information......................................................................................................7 Contact Data................................................................................................................................................7 Legal Information .........................................................................................................................................8 Symbols .......................................................................................................................................................9 Symbols Used in This Guide ........................................................................................................................9 Hardware Symbols.....................................................................................................................................10 Hardware....................................................................................................................................................13 Using the Hardware ...................................................................................................................................13 Documentation .........................................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • The Basic Surgery Kit
    GLOBAL EXCLUSIVE > SURGERY > PEER REVIEWED The Basic Surgery Kit Jan Janovec, MVDr, MRCVS VRCC Veterinary Referrals Laurent Findji, DMV, MS, MRCVS, DECVS Fitzpatrick Referrals Considering the virtually limitless range of surgical instruments, it can be difficult to assemble a cost-effective basic surgery kit. Some instruments may misleadingly appear multipurpose, but their misuse may damage them, leading to unnecessary replacement costs or, worse, intraoperative accidents putting the patient’s safety at risk. Many instru- ments are available in different qualities and materials (eg, tungsten carbide instruments— more expensive but much more resistant to wear and corrosion than stainless steel) and Minimal Basic Surgery Kit varied sizes to match the purpose of their use as well as the size of the surgeon’s hand. n 1 instrument case Cutting Instruments n 1 scalpel handle Scalpel n 1 pair Mayo scissors The scalpel is an indispensible item in a surgical kit designed to make sharp incisions. Scalpel incision is the least traumatic way of dissection, but provides no hemostasis. n 1 pair Metzenbaum scissors Scalpel handles come in various sizes, each accommodating a range of disposable n 1 pair suture scissors blades (Figure 1). Entirely disposable scalpels are also available. n 1 pair Mayo-Hegar needle holder Scissors n 1 pair Brown-Adson tissue forceps Scissors are used for cutting, albeit with some crushing effect, and for blunt dissection. n 1 pair DeBakey tissue forceps Fine scissors, such as Metzenbaum scissors (Figure 2), should be reserved for cutting n 4 pairs mosquito hemostatic forceps and dissecting delicate tissues. Sturdier scissors, such as Mayo or suture scissors, are designed for use on denser tissues (eg, fascia) or inanimate objects (eg, sutures, drapes).
    [Show full text]
  • Covidien-Or-Products-Catalog.Pdf
    OR Products 1-800-962-9888 1-800-962-9888 The products shown in this catalog may not be licensed or registered in all parts of the world. Please contact your sales representative for availability. 1 Table of Contents OR Suction OR Safety Argyle™ Yankauer Suction Instruments, Rigid Type ................ 2 Sponge Counting Systems ........................................................ 18 Argyle™ Yankauer Suction Instruments, Flexible Type ............ 3 Solidification Products .............................................................. 18 Argyle™ Poole and Suction Sets ................................................... 4 Devon™ Hands Free Transfer Magnetic Drapes ..................... 19 Curity™ Suction Instruments and Sets ........................................ 4 Devon™ Magnetic Drapes with Neutral Zones ....................... 19 Argyle™ Suction Tubing ................................................................ 5 Devon™ Trays and Basins .......................................................... 19 ™ Argyle™ Universal Bubble Tubing ............................................... 6 Devon Reusable Magnetic Drapes ......................................... 20 ™ Argyle™ Tubing Connectors ......................................................... 6 Devon Blade Shield Scalpel Holder ....................................... 20 ™ Solidification Products ................................................................. 7 Devon Magnetic Needle Finder ............................................. 21 Devon™ Safe-T-Strainer Instrument Handling
    [Show full text]
  • Otology – Otoscopy
    EXTRACT FROM THE ENT CATALOG OTOLOGY – OTOSCOPY 10th EDITION 1/2019 It is recommended to check the suitability of the product for the intended procedure prior to use. Please note that the described products in this medium may not be available yet in all countries due to different regulatory requirements. Not all the products listed in this document are certified according to Regulation 2017/745/EU. For this reason, some products requiring certification under this Regulation may not be available in every country. © All product illustrations, product descriptions and texts are the intellectual property of KARL STORZ SE & Co. KG. Their use and reproduction by third parties require the express approval of KARL STORZ SE & Co. KG. All rights reserved. 12-20 OTOLOGY – OTOSCOPY OTOSCOPY . .2-7 INSTRUMENTS FOR DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY – OUTER EAR . .8-23 EAR MICROSURGERY . .24-75 ENDOSCOPIC MIDDLE EAR SURGERY . .76-82 RACKS AND CONTAINERS . .83-86 Otoscopy with HOPKINS® Telescopes Special Features: ● For visualization of the eardrum ● HOPKINS® telescopes available in diameters 1.9 mm, 2.7 mm, 3 mm and 4 mm for ear diagnosis and surgery 2 2-94 2 OTO-TEL Otoscopy with HOPKINS® Telescopes Diameter 1.9 mm, length 10 cm For preoperative and postoperative examinations of the middle ear 1232 AA 1232 AA HOPKINS® Straight Forward Telescope 0°, diameter 1.9 mm, length 10 cm, autoclavable, fiber optic light transmission incorporated, color code: green 1232 BA HOPKINS® Forward-Oblique Telescope 30°, diameter 1.9 mm, length 10 cm, autoclavable, fiber optic light
    [Show full text]
  • What to Teach a New Technician: Part II
    INSTRUMENT WHISPERER What to Teach a New Technician: Part II BY RICK SCHULTZ he Instrument Whisperer retractor is used to move tissue, muscle column in the May/June issue and organs aside in order to expose of PROCESS addressed the the surgical site. It is important for the importance of process in the technician to know the proper names and Thiring, training and retention of quality how to measure (See Figure A) to ensure Sterile Processing (SP) professionals. It the correct retractor is placed into the also specifically addressed the importance surgical set. of instrument inspection and the new technician’s need to know the basic instrument groups. That article focused on inspection of scissors, needle holders and hemostats. This article focuses on Figure B the following three instrument groups: • Retractors; • Suction devices; and • Scalpel handles Note: Once the right person has been hired, it is beneficial to have them observe four or five surgeries of various specialties, so they can see the use of the products they will be putting into trays. Figure A Retractors Retractors play a crucial role in surgery. Two common types of hand-held As with all surgical instruments, it is retractors are the Kelly retractor important to learn the most commonly- (Figure B) and the Richardson retractor used retractors, their main differences (Figure C). and how to properly inspect them. The difference between these retractors There are several broad categories of is the depth and width of the blades. A Figure C retractors: Kelly retractor is always larger than a • Hand-held retractors – A hand-held Richardson retractor.
    [Show full text]
  • VATS Instruments
    VATS Instruments Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Surgical Speciality Products VATS Instruments Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Forceps / Clamps | Diameter 7 mm | Usable length 25 cm STANDARD INSTRUMENT - COMPLETE Description FOERSTER LUNG GRASPER 25 cm 15 mm oval ring jaws, 15° angled, 63 mm jaw length, Forceps/Clamps double action ¹⁄1 FC810R 25 cm TISSUE GRASPING FORCEPS 30° angled, 65 mm jaw length, single action ¹⁄1 FC811R 25 cm MARYLAND DISSECTING FORCEPS curved, 21 mm jaw length, double action ¹⁄1 FC812R 25 cm DISSECTING FORCEPS straight, 25 mm jaw length, double action ¹⁄1 FC813R 2 SINGLE COMPONENTS Jaw Insert Insulated outer tube Handle Forceps/Clamps ½ FC860R without ratchet ½ FC800R FC861R FC808P with ratchet, disengageable ½ FC801R FC862R ½ FC863R 3 VATS Instruments Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Forceps / Clamps | Diameter 7 mm | Usable length 25 cm STANDARD INSTRUMENT - COMPLETE Description OVERHOLT DISSECTING FORCEPS 90° 65 mm jaw length, double action Forceps/Clamps 25 cm ¹⁄1 FC814R OVERHOLT DISSECTING FORCEPS 90° delicate, 64 mm jaw length, double action 25 cm ¹⁄1 FC815R 25 cm OVERHOLT DISSECTING FORCEPS 60° 40 mm jaw length, double action ¹⁄1 FC816R BIOPSY FORCEPS 30° curved, 14 mm jaw length, double action ¹⁄1 FC820R 4 SINGLE COMPONENTS Jaw Insert Insulated outer tube Handle Forceps/Clamps ½ FC864R without ratchet ½ FC800R FC865R FC808P with ratchet, disengageable ½ FC801R FC866R ½ FC870R 5 VATS Instruments Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Forceps / Clamps | Diameter 7 mm | Usable length 25 cm STANDARD
    [Show full text]
  • THERMAL SCALPEL SYSTEM MODEL PRECISION 8400 (P8400) HANDLE Part Number 7013-8050
    THERMAL SCALPEL SYSTEM MODEL PRECISION 8400 (P8400) HANDLE Part Number 7013-8050 For use with the Hemostatix Thermal Scalpel System Model P8400 Controller OPERATING MANUAL INTRODUCTION HEMOSTATIX THERMAL SCALPEL BLADES are similar in size, shape, and sharpness to traditional steel scalpel blades; however, Hemostatix blades can be heated to a user- selected temperature appropriate for sealing small vessels as they are cut. To cut and simultaneously seal blood vessels effectively with minimum tissue damage, the sharp steel cutting edge of a heated scalpel blade must be uniformly maintained at the desired temperature within narrow limits. The Hemostatix Thermal Scalpel System utilizes micro-circuitry incorporated within the blade itself to maintain the cutting edge temperature within the necessary tolerance, selectively delivering additional thermal energy only to those regions of the blade using heat due to tissue contact. By so doing, the Hemostatix Thermal Scalpel System automatically compensates for the varying degrees of heat loss that occur during surgical procedures (depending on the type of tissue being incised and the rate at which cutting is carried out), maintaining the cutting edge in the desired temperature range. In contrast with electrosurgical devices, the Hemostatix Thermal Scalpel System passes no electrical current through the patient, and there is no sparking or electrical arcing to the tissue. Electrosurgical devices “cut” and/or cauterize using electrical currents which pass through the patient vaporizing tissue at the point of contact and generating heat and tissue damage down the path of the electrical current. The Hemostatix Thermal Scalpel System cuts tissue with a sharpened steel edge, like a conventional cold-steel scalpel blade, and simultaneously seals blood vessels using heat thermally conducted to the tissue from an elevated-temperature blade which is electrically insulated from the patient.
    [Show full text]
  • National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
    242 NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES PROGRAMME Interventional procedures overview of tonsillectomy using ultrasonic scalpel Introduction This overview has been prepared to assist members of the Interventional Procedures Advisory Committee (IPAC) in making recommendations about the safety and efficacy of an interventional procedure. It is based on a rapid review of the medical literature and specialist opinion. It should not be regarded as a definitive assessment of the procedure. Date prepared This overview was prepared in August 2005. Procedure names • Harmonic scalpel for tonsillectomy. • Ultrasonic scalpel. • Ultrasound activated scalpel. Specialty society British Association of Otorhinolaryngologists, Head and Neck Surgeons. Description Indications Indications for tonsillectomy include recurrent acute or chronic tonsillitis, peritonsillar abscess and pharyngeal obstruction/obstructive sleep apnoea. Life-threatening complications of these conditions are rare and the main aim of surgery is to relieve symptoms. Current treatment and alternatives Surgical removal of the tonsils (tonsillectomy) is one of the most common surgical procedures in the UK. The operation is performed in many different ways but can be broadly divided into two stages: removal (either complete or partial) of the tonsil, followed by control of bleeding (haemostasis). Traditional ‘cold steel’ tonsillectomy consists of two stages: removal of the tonsil followed by haemostasis. Bleeding is controlled by pressure, then by ligatures. The use of ligatures may be supplemented by diathermy and the use of packs. Diathermy uses radiofrequency energy applied directly to the tissue, and can be bipolar (current passes between the two tips of the forceps) or monopolar (current passes between the forceps tips and a plate attached to the patient’s skin).
    [Show full text]
  • 3544-3551-Study on the Use of Focus Harmonic Scalpel in Thyroidectomies
    Eur opean Rev iew for Med ical and Pharmacol ogical Sci ences 2016; 20: 3544-3551 Study on the use of focus harmonic scalpel in thyroidectomies: is it useful also in preserving voice function? A. MINNI 1, D. ROSATI 1, C. CAVALIERE 1, A. DE CARLO 1, G. ILLUMINATI 2, V. SCARANO CATANZARO 2, M. BONONI 3 1Department of Sensory Organs, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Azienda Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy 2“F. Durante” Department of Surgical Science, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Azienda Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy 3Department of Surgery “P. Valdoni”, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Azienda Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy Abstract. – OBJECTIVE : The aim of this ran - Key Words: domized study is to evaluate the real benefits of Thyroid surgery, Focus Harmonic Scalpel, Voice the FOCUS Harmonic Scalpel in total thyroidec - function . tomies compared with conventional ligation, re - garding operative time, postoperative blood loss, length of stay and complications. Further - Introduction more, as never seen in other studies, we studied the effects of using the FOCUS during thy - roidectomy analyzing the vocal production of During the past decades, the techniques of thy - patients before and after surgery. roid surgery have undergone small changes only. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 361 On the other hand, the last twenty years have patients who underwent total thyroidectomy from 2008 to 2014. It was a randomized clinical trial in seen dynamic development of new instruments which all the surgical procedures were performed that has had a significant impact on this kind of by the same surgeon. Patients were randomized surgery 1-3 .
    [Show full text]
  • Cranial Burr Hole
    SMART LINK TO VIDEO ™ CRANIAL BURR HOLE Equipment Hair clippers or razor Skin stapler Skin disinfectant Drain Drape Gauze Scalpel Self-retaining scalp retractor Cranial drill (hand drill and Hudson-brace shown) 1 2 3 Review CT Landmarks Reduce scalp bleeding Use CT to identify the site. Measure the If no CT is available: 2 cm superior, 2 cm Inject lidocaine with epinephrine. skull to determine depth to drill. anterior to tragus, ipsilateral to blown Palpate the superficial temporal artery pupil (temporal site). Shave the hair, (STA) and remain anterior to it. prep and drape. 4 5 6 Skin incision Insert the retractor Trephination Make a 3-5 cm vertical incision down to Insert the self-retaining scalp Technique varies with equipment. bone. Control scalp bleeding; the frontal retractor to expose periosteum. Have an assistant stabilize the branch of the STA is often transected. head. This is for reference purposes only. Consent to photograph was obtained from the patient or family. EM:RAP and the authors assume no liability for use of the techniques described. Local practice, current guidelines, and clinician experience should determine the exact procedural process in any individual patient. © 2020 EM:RAP Inc. SMART LINK TO VIDEO ™ CRANIAL BURR HOLE 7 A B Using a Hudson-Brace Drilling with the perforator bit Drilling with the conical burr Use the perforator bit to drill When the drilling motion becomes through the outer table, felt as a jagged, switch to the conical burr to smooth drilling motion. trephinate the inner table of the skull. Note: the non-rotating hand should provide counter-torque and resist forward motion of the drill.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonly Used Surgical Instruments
    COMMON SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS The operating room contains a multitude of instruments fit for accomplishing a number of procedures. Note that this is not an exhaustive list of instruments, but rather some that you will encounter frequently. SCALPEL Used for initial incision and cutting tissue. Consists of a blade and a handle. Surgeons #10 Blade: Used primarily for #11 Blade: Used for making #15 Blade: Smaller version of often refer to the making large skin incisions, precise or sharply angled #10 blade used for making finer instrument by its blade e.g., in laparotomy. incisions. incisions. number. Pott’s Scissors: Fine scissors used for creating SCISSORS incisions in blood vessels. Used for cutting tissue, suture, or for Iris Scissors: Used Mayo Scissors: Heavy scissors Metzenbaum Scissors: Lighter dissection. Scissors for fine dissection available in multiple varieties. scissors used for cutting delicate can be straight or and cutting fine Straight scissors are used for tissue (e.g., heart) and for blunt curved, and may be suture. Originally cutting suture (“suture scissors”), dissection. Also called “Metz” in for ophthalmic used for cutting heavy while curved scissors are used practice. procedures, but or finer structures. for cutting heavy tissue (e.g., now serves fascia). multipurpose role. Bonney DeBakey Russian Forceps: Forceps: Forceps: Heavy Used for Used for Tissue Forceps: Non-toothed forceps atraumatic atraumatic FORCEPS forceps used for fine handling used for tissue tissue Also known as non- of tissue and traction during holding grasping grasping locking forceps, dissection. thick tissue during during grasping forceps, (e.g., fascial dissection. dissection. thumb forceps, or closure).
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of the Use of Harmonic Scalpel Versus
    [Downloaded free from http://www.nigerianjsurg.com on Thursday, May 18, 2017, IP: 165.255.213.249] Original Article A Comparative Study of the Use of Harmonic Scalpel versus Unipolar Cautery in Modified Radical Mastectomy Pallavi Mittal, Ashwani Kumar, Sunmeet Kaur1, Paras Kumar Pandove, Rachan Lal Singla, Jagpal Singh Department of Surgery, Context: Oncosurgery is an emerging branch with the set goals of prolonging Government Medical College and Rajindra Hospital, the life and ensuring the best possible quality of life to the surviving patient. Patiala, Punjab, 1Medical The use of harmonic scalpel has proved to be beneficial in a variety of surgeries Student, All India Institute but its role in breast surgery is still controversial. Aims: We conducted this of Medical Sciences, Abstract study to compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in modified New Delhi, India radical mastectomy using harmonic scalpel versus electrocautery. Subjects and Methods: Fifty female patients with confirmed diagnosis of breast carcinoma and planned for modified radical mastectomy were taken up for surgery. Twenty‑five patients were operated using harmonic scalpel (Group A) and another 25 were operated using unipolar cautery (Group B). Results: The mean operative time was significantly longer with harmonic scalpel when compared to that with electrocautery (140.40 ± 29.96 vs. 99.80 ± 24.00 min, P < 0.001). The smaller amount of drainage content (431.60 ± 145.94 vs. 594.20 ± 278.63, P = 0.013) and intraoperative blood loss (426.00 ± 76.54 vs. 502.00 ± 104.56, P = 0.005) in the group operated with the ultrasound harmonic scalpel was statistically significant.
    [Show full text]