Amber Waves of Gain

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Amber Waves of Gain AMBERAmberW AWavesVES OF of Gain:GAIN: How the F a r m Bureau Is Reaping Profits at the Expense of America’s Family Far m e r s , Taxpayers and the E n v i r onment April, 2000 DEDICATION This report is dedicated to the memory of Joseph Y. Resnick, the two-term congressman from New York who first exposed the Farm Bureau as not being the organization of farmers it claims to be. Resnick launched an investigation of the Farm Bureau in 1967 and resumed it after leaving politics in1969. He died later that year, but the probe he initiated and funded continued, culminating two years later in the publication of the book Dollar Harvest, a major exposé about the Farm Bureau by former Resnick aide Samuel R. Berger. This report builds on the foundation laid by Resnick and resurrects his call for the dealings of the Farm Bureau to be closely examined on Capitol Hill. AMBER WAVES OF GAIN Table of Contents Foreword..............................................................................................iv Executive Summary...............................................................................v Introduction: The Farm Lobby Colossus..............................................1 1. Emphasizing the Bottom Line..........................................................8 2. Plumping for Factory Hog Farms ..................................................19 3. Changing Rural America................................................................30 4. Cooperating with Conglomerates...................................................34 iii 5. Taking Care of Business..................................................................46 6. Pushing an Anti-Wildlife Agenda...................................................56 7. Spinning the Global Warming Issue...............................................62 8. Putting Pest Control Before Human Health...................................66 9. Aligning With the Extreme Right...................................................75 Conclusion: A Call to Common Ground............................................84 Appendix 1. Farm Bureau Connections..............................................85 Appendix 2. Tax Treatment of Unrelated Business Income for Agricultural and Horticultural Organizations................90 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS PRINCIPAL AUTHOR: Vicki Monks CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS: Robert M. Ferris, Vice President for Species Conservation Program, Defenders of Wildlife Don Campbell PROJECT MANAGER: Robert M. Ferris RESEARCH COORDINATOR: Heather Pellet, Species Conservation Program Coordinator, Defenders of Wildlife RESEARCH: Scotty Johnson, Rural Outreach Coordinator, Grassroots Environmental Effectiveness Network (GREEN) Roger Featherstone, Director, GREEN Carol/Trevelyan Strategy Group (Dan Carol, Catharine Gilliam) Rob Roy Smith, Species Conservation Program Intern, Defenders of Wildlife William J. Snape III, Vice President for Law and Litigation, Defenders of Wildlife Joe McCaleb EDITING AND PRODUCTION: James G. Deane, Vice President for Publications, Defenders of Wildlife Kate Davies, Publications Manager, Defenders of Wildlife Maureen Hearn, Editorial Associate, Defenders of Wildlife DESIGN: Cissy Russell ABOUT DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE Defenders of Wildlife is a leading nonprofit conservation organization recognized as one of the nation’s most progres- sive advocates for wildlife and its habitat. Defenders uses education, litigation, research and promotion of conservation policies to protect wild animals and plants in their natural communities. Known for its effective leadership on endan- gered species issues, Defenders also advocates new approaches to wildlife conservation that protect species before they become endangered. Founded in 1947, Defenders of Wildlife is a 501(c)(3) membership organization headquartered in Washington, D.C., and has nearly 400,000 members and supporters. Copyright ã 2000 by Defenders of Wildlife, 1101 Fourteenth Street NW,Washington, D.C. 20005; 202-682-9400. Visit our website at www.defenders.org and our children’s website at www.kidsplanet.org. Cover Illustration: David Chen/The Stock Illustration Source Printed on recycled paper. AMBER WAVES OF GAIN Foreword Foreword n December, 1997,Defenders of Wildlife heard deeply disturbing news. A federal district judge in Wyoming had ruled that Yellowstone and central Idaho wolf reintroductions car- ried out by the federal government in 1995 and 1996 were unlawful and that the thriving Inew wolf populations must be removed. Since their former territories in Canada were by then occupied by other wolves and there wasn’t room for them in the nation’s zoos, it appeared that the wolves would have to be killed. The ruling threatened to erase years of hard work by the government and conservation- ists and to destroy what has been called the most popular and successful wildlife restoration effort of the 20th century, an effort in which Defenders had been a leader for two decades. The most significant plaintiff in the lawsuit responsible for the court decision was the American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF — or the Farm Bureau). AFBF and its state and county units regularly oppose not only measures to sustain and recover endangered species like the wolf but many important environmental protection efforts. The organization also is negative toward other widely accepted laws and public policies. Its 1998 policy manual, for example, advocated repeal of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, opposed registration and licensing of firearms and advocated abolishing the U.S. Department of Education. From its name, one might suppose that the Farm Bur eau exists to serve American family farmers. In reality the Farm Bur eau is a gigantic agribusiness and insurance conglomerate. Th e majority of its “me m b e r s ” are not farmers, but customers of Farm Bur eau insurance companies and other business ven t u r es. Yet the organization’s nonprofi t status allows it to use the U.S. tax code to help build a financial war chest with which it pursues an extreme political agenda, while doing little for — and sometimes working against — America’s family farmers. We decided that we should try to find out more about this politically powerful organiza- tion and make what we learned available to the public. The result is the accompanying report. We would have liked to examine more of the Farm Bureau’s operations but lacked the time and resources to do so.We believe the public deserves to learn the full facts about this huge financial conglomerate that purports to be the voice of America’s family farmers. Rodger Schlickeisen President, Defenders of Wildlife AMBER WAVES OF GAIN Foreword Executive Summary he American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) — with its roughly 3,000 constituent state and county farm bureaus — ranks among the richest and most powerful non- governmental organizations in America. AFBF claims to have more than 4.9 million Tmembers. It has artfully portrayed itself as the voice and champion of our nation’s fam- ily farmers for nearly 80 years. The vast majority of the Farm Bure a u ’s members, howeve r , are either policyholders of one of numerous insurance companies affiliated with state farm bureaus or are customers of other farm bureau business ven t u r es. (At latest count there wer e some 54 farm bureau insurance companies.) Such members have no say in establishing or carrying out Farm Bur eau policies and, in most cases, have no particular interest in agriculture. AFBF spends a great deal of money and time opposing environmental laws such as the Endangered Species Act, the Clean Air and Safe Drinking Water Acts, wetlands laws and pesticide regulations. But the organization’s views may have more to do with its own finan- vi cial interests than with the views of its members or the needs of the family farmer. AFBF is allied with some of the nation’s biggest agribusinesses. It has large investments in the automobile, oil and pesticide industries, often supports factory farming rather than family farming and regularly opposes government regulation to reduce air and water pollu- tion and pesticide use and to protect wildlife, habitat, rural amenities and food quality. It is critical of efforts to counter global warming. It has opposed the registration and licensing of firearms. It has advocated repeal of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, one of the nation’s key civil rights laws. It has advocated abolition of the federal Department of Education and of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. It has launched lawsuits to halt reintroduction of endangered gray wolves. It is allied politically with, and provides funding for, right-wing interests and the so-called wise-use movement, which works for the supremacy of private property owner- ship and against the protection and conservation of public lands. The Farm Bureau’s policies are set by voting delegates at its annual meetings. Many high officers of the national and state farm bureaus also serve as officers or directors of the insur- ance companies and of Farm Bureau cooperatives and other businesses. Defenders of Wildlife first investigated the Farm Bureau because of the longstanding Farm Bureau lobbying campaigns against wildlife and environmental protections. We found, AMBER WAVES OF GAIN Foreword however, that the Farm Bureau not only opposes our core mission but also works actively against the interests of rural communities and mainstream America. A significant problem facing rural communities in the last decade has been the rise in factory farms which produce hundreds of thousands of hogs every year. The Farm Bureau has
Recommended publications
  • San Acacia Habitat Restoration Project Draft Environmental
    San Acacia Habitat Restoration Project from River Mile 116 to 99, Socorro County, New Mexico Environmental Assessment Prepared for Bureau of Reclamation, Albuquerque Area Office On Behalf of New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission, Albuquerque Office Prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants February 2016 SAN ACACIA HABITAT RESTORATION PROJECT FROM RIVER MILE 116 TO 99, SOCORRO COUNTY, NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Prepared for BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, ALBUQUERQUE AREA OFFICE 555 Broadway NE, Suite 100 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 On behalf of NEW MEXICO INTERSTATE STREAM COMMISSION, ALBUQUERQUE OFFICE 5550 San Antonio Drive NE Albuquerque, New Mexico 87109 Prepared by SWCA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 5647 Jefferson Street NE Albuquerque, New Mexico 87109 Telephone: 505-254-1115, Fax: 505-254-1116 www.swca.com SWCA Project No. 34090 February 2016 San Acacia Habitat Restoration Project from River Mile 116 to 99, Socorro County, New Mexico Environmental Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Purpose and Need for Action ........................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and Need for the Action ...................................................................................... 3 1.3 Relevant Statutes, Regulations, and Other Plans .............................................................. 3 1.4 Issues ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Farm and Its Functions
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 097 222 88 ME 018 230 TITLE The Far --Its Function and Future. Environmental Ecological Education Project. Revised. INSTITUTION Parkway School District, Chesterfield, Mo. SPONS AGENCY Bureau of Elementary and Secondary Education (DHEN/OE), Washington, D.C. PUB DATE Jun 72 NOTE 156p. !DRS PRICE MF-$0.75 RC-$7.80 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS *Agricultural Education; Agriculture; Conservation Education; *Curriculum Guides; Ecology; *Environmental Education; Farmers; *Farm Visits; Instructional Materials; Learning Activities; *Primary Education; Teaching Guides; Units of Study (Subject Fields) IDENTIFIERS Elementary Secondary Education Act Title III; !SEA Title III ABSTRACT This unit, designed for use in the primary grades (K-3), focuses on the farm and its functions. The various aspects of farming are discussed from an ecological and environmental point of view through such topics as soil, plants, animals, machinery, production of food, job opportunities, and the future of the farm. There is also a comparison of the farm and the city and the value systems operating in each of the two environments. The unit includes the behavioral objectives and the expected student criteria for evaluation, pretests and posttests for each targeted grade level, suggested methodologies and sequence for teaching each concept, relevant background information, suggested field trips, patterns for student worksheets, a list of appropriate films, and a bibliograrAy for additional teacher resources. (MLB) .e U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION I WELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION !... N' PTA lit IN kf PRO BEST !COPY AVAILABLE n.1 0 ITT., V A' ktTE.VIn F koy T Af PI IT SON (.4 I)I.TT TANI/A IION Ok o(TIN ATi'p.
    [Show full text]
  • Farm Security Administation Photographs in Indiana
    FARM SECURITY ADMINISTRATION PHOTOGRAPHS IN INDIANA A STUDY GUIDE Roy Stryker Told the FSA Photographers “Show the city people what it is like to live on the farm.” TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 The FSA - OWI Photographic Collection at the Library of Congress 1 Great Depression and Farms 1 Roosevelt and Rural America 2 Creation of the Resettlement Administration 3 Creation of the Farm Security Administration 3 Organization of the FSA 5 Historical Section of the FSA 5 Criticisms of the FSA 8 The Indiana FSA Photographers 10 The Indiana FSA Photographs 13 City and Town 14 Erosion of the Land 16 River Floods 16 Tenant Farmers 18 Wartime Stories 19 New Deal Communities 19 Photographing Indiana Communities 22 Decatur Homesteads 23 Wabash Farms 23 Deshee Farms 24 Ideal of Agrarian Life 26 Faces and Character 27 Women, Work and the Hearth 28 Houses and Farm Buildings 29 Leisure and Relaxation Activities 30 Afro-Americans 30 The Changing Face of Rural America 31 Introduction This study guide is meant to provide an overall history of the Farm Security Administration and its photographic project in Indiana. It also provides background information, which can be used by students as they carry out the curriculum activities. Along with the curriculum resources, the study guide provides a basis for studying the history of the photos taken in Indiana by the FSA photographers. The FSA - OWI Photographic Collection at the Library of Congress The photographs of the Farm Security Administration (FSA) - Office of War Information (OWI) Photograph Collection at the Library of Congress form a large-scale photographic record of American life between 1935 and 1944.
    [Show full text]
  • 1985 Land and Resource Management Plan
    Cibola National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan Table of Contents Page 1. INTRODUCTION Purpose of the Plan . 1 Relationship to Other Planning Levels and Studies . 1 Planning Process. 2 Organization of the Proposed Forest Plan Document . 5-1 Planning Area Description . 5-1 2. PUBLIC ISSUES AND MANAGEMENT CONCERNS Overview. 7 Firewood and Miscellaneous Products . 7 Range Management. 7 Soil and Water. 8 Recreation. 8 Mineral’s Management. 9 Transportation. 9 Electronic Site Management. 10 Wilderness Management . 10 Riparian Management . 10 Unauthorized Use. 11 National Grasslands . 11 Public Information and Education. 11 3. SUMMARY OF THE ANALYSIS OF THE MANAGEMENT SITUATION Overview. 13 Timber and Firewood . 14 Wilderness. 16 Wildlife and Fish . 17 Range . 19 Recreation. 20 Minerals. 22 Soil and Water. 24 Cultural Resources. 24 Research Natural Areas. 25 Diversity . 26 Visual Resources. 26 Lands and Special Uses. 27 Listed Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers . 28 Air . 28 Protection. 28 Facilities. 30 4. MANAGEMENT DIRECTION Mission . 33 Goals . 33 Objectives. 34 Management Prescriptions. 54 Management Prescriptions Applicable to all Areas. 56 Management Area 1 (Sandia Mountain Wilderness). 81 Management Area 2 (Sandia Ranger District). 84 Management Area 3 (Manzano Mountain, Apache Kid, and Withington Wildernesses) . 95 Management Area 4 (Black Kettle and McClellan Creek National Grasslands). 99 Management Area 5 (Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands) . 105 Management Area 7 (Langmuir Research site) . 109 Management Area 8 (Mt. Taylor Ranger District). 117 Management Area 9 (Mt. Taylor Ranger District). 127 Management Area 10 (Mt. Talyor Ranger District) . 133 Management Area 11 (Magdalena and Mountainair Ranger Districts) . 141 Management Area 12 (Mountainair and Magdalena Ranger Districts) .
    [Show full text]
  • THE FARM BILL and INDIAN COUNTRY: Assessing the Present and Looking Ahead Policy Recommendations for the Federal Government
    THE FARM BILL AND INDIAN COUNTRY: Assessing the Present and Looking Ahead Policy Recommendations for the Federal Government Policy Recommendations for the Federal Government 1 This Brief’s Purpose NCAI and its partners (see below) produced this concise brief to: (1) provide a cursory assessment of the state of implementation of the landmark tribal provisions contained in the 2018 Farm Bill; (2) share Indian Country’s policy recommendations for Congress and the Administration about how to strengthen the implementation of those provisions; and (3) set forth an initial list of Indian Country’s overarching policy priorities for the 2023 Farm Bill which can be expanded upon. A mid-point status report about how the Farm Bill is working for Indian Country and how it could work better, this brief serves as an important education and advocacy tool for tribal leaders and key decision-makers as they deepen their dialogue with federal policymakers about: (1) how best they can strengthen implementation of the current Farm Bill provisions; and (2) what is needed in the next Farm Bill, slated for passage in 2023. A Collaborative Production This brief would not have been possible without the close partnership and invaluable input of the following organizations: First Nations Development Institute, Indigenous Food and Agriculture Initiative, Intertribal Agriculture Council, Intertribal Timber Council, and the Native Farm Bill Coalition. About the Native Farm Bill Coalition The Native Farm Bill Coalition (NFBC) was established at the NCAI Annual Convention in October 2017 by the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community, Intertribal Agriculture Council, National Congress of American Indians, and Indigenous Food and Agriculture Initiative (research partner).
    [Show full text]
  • Magdalena Ranger District
    Alamo Band DDaattiill MMoouunnttaaiinnss Navajo BBeeaarr MMoouunnttaaiinnss A 76 $+ E Alamo $+31 E 12.1 Band $+ E E Navajo $+12 $+2 354 Bear Mountains $+ 6 1 (D3_5K7b) Z 4 Datil Mountains 1 E Bear Mountains 1 A $+ 2 (D3_5K7) Pie 6 1 (D3_5K11) Town 3 5 2 9 1 169 Bear Mountains 3 (D3_5K7d) 4 1 4 A 5 9 5 3 3 Datil Mountains 6 Wilderness 0 0 1 (D3_5K10) 1 2 8 A E 5 62 $+ 6 6 10 Datil A $+64 $+354 12 ¤£60 !^ Magdalena The management areas and recommendations shown on the map are draft. Where overlap may occur between manage5m2 ent areas and 107 101 existing designated areas, management will be $+ A directed by law, regulation, and policy for that 130 Miles 1 $+ 0 0 5 10 20 designated area. 1 $+549 $+354 2 3 1 MMaaggddaalleennaa 549 San Mateo Mountains 4 0 $+ San Mateo Mountains !^ 60 169 Magdalena ¤£MMoouunnttaaiinnss 52 KELLEY R$+OAD 52 4 3 2 107 $+101 0 2 1 2 0 235 Withington 1 $+ Wilderness Expansion 7 (D3_ADJ3b) 47 !9 Withington 6 !9 Withington Wilderness 107 Wilderness Expansion !9 3 (D3_ADJ3d) *1 9 5 4 Withington Magdalena 23 5 Panther Withington Wilderness Wilderness Mountains Canyon 23 Magdalena Expansion 5 4 1 (D3_5K2) (D3_5K16) Expansion 6 (D3_ADJ7 Mountains (D3_ADJ3c) 2 (D3_5k3) 8 3 3 30 1 LANGMUIR 6 RESEARCH 9 4 7 8 378 SITE Apache Kid Wilderness Expansion 1 (D3_ADJ8) TORREON SPR$+INGS RD Apache Kid Wilderness Miles 0 1.25 2.5 5 Expansion 2(D3_ADJ8b) 8 47 Wilderness Analysis Process 6 8 Alternative D Cibola National Forest Draft Environmental Impact Statetement Apache Kid 52 Wilderness Magdalena RD Apache Kid Wilderness Expansion USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Off-Farm Agriculture Occupations of Millard, Beaver, Iron, and Washington Counties in Utah, to Determine Educational Needs
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-1967 A Study of the Off-Farm Agriculture Occupations of Millard, Beaver, Iron, and Washington Counties in Utah, to Determine Educational Needs Thales C. Brown Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Agriculture Commons Recommended Citation Brown, Thales C., "A Study of the Off-Farm Agriculture Occupations of Millard, Beaver, Iron, and Washington Counties in Utah, to Determine Educational Needs" (1967). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 2966. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/2966 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A STUDY OF THE OFF-FARM AGRICULTURE OCCUPATIO S OF MILLARD, BEAVER, IRON, AND WASH! GTON COUNTIES IN UTAH, TO DETERMINE EDUCATIONAL NEEDS by Thales C. Brown A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Agricultural Education UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 1967 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to express his sincere appreciation to Professor Stanley S. Richardson under whose direction this study was undertaken and completed. Appreciation is also extended to Dr. Eldon M. Drake, and Professor Von Jarrett, members of the graduate committee. I am grateful to many individuals who ha<e given me much helpful advice, assistance, and encouragement while completing this study. wish to express my appreciation to those who participated, including businessmen, firms, companies, and organizations, in the four counties surveyed.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • “Thinking Like a Mountain”
    “Thinking Like a Mountain” Escudilla Wilderness Additions Wilderness Study Area Proposal Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests Prepared by: The White Mountain Conservation League http://azwmcl.org 2009 “Each hollow seemed its own small world, soaked in sun, fragrant with juniper, and cozy with the chatter of pinon jays. But top out on a ridge and you at once became a speck into an immensity. On its edge hung Escudilla.” Aldo Leopold “Escudilla” A Sand County Almanac. Escudilla Wilderness Additions WSA Updated 4-2-2009 page 1 White Mountain Conservation League Mission The White Mountain Conservation League (WMCL), a 503c organization, is a local action group dedicated to sustaining and enhancing the White Mountain ecosystems and communities. The spectacular White Mountain region provides habitat for hundreds of plant and animal species. The WMCL embraces and encourages stewardship of all components of the region’s diverse ecosystems and recognizes their value to our regional economic vitality and quality of life. The WMCL objectives of promoting natural resources stewardship and sustainability are achieved by active participation at all levels of land and wildlife management decision making to address environmental issues important to our membership and community. page 2 Updated 4-2-2009 Escudilla Wilderness Additions WSA Acknowledgments The White Mountain Conservation League (WMCL) would like to thank all of the members who spent so many hours and days in the fi eld inventorying the potential wilderness quality of lands on Escudilla Mountain. Those members include Dave Denali, Jonathon Frenzen, Tom Hollender, Don Hoffman, Dave and Kim Holaway, Cathy and Mike Pensinger, Ann and Steve McQueen, Candy Cook, Cliff Livingston and his son.
    [Show full text]
  • Farm Crisis Response: Extension and Research Activities in the North Central Region
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 286 706 RC 016 447 AUTHOR Lasley, Paul, Comp.; And Others TITLE Farm Crisis Response: Extension and Research Activities in the North Central Region. INSTITUTION North Central Regional Center for Rural Development, Ames, Iowa. PUB DATE 86 NOTE 73p.; A network organized by Paul Lasley and Rand Conger, Iowa State University. PUB TYPE Guides - Non-Classroom Use (055) -- Collected Works - General (020) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCC3 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Agriculture; Community Action; Community Problems; *Economic Status; Extension Agents; *Extension Education; Family Problems; *Farmers; Higher Education; Institutional Role; *Land Grant Universities; Program Descriptions; Program Effectiveness; Regional Characteristics; Regional Programs; Rescrch Needs; Responses; Rural Areas; *Rural Extension; Stress Management IDENTIFIERS Cooperative Extension Service; Economic Impact; *Farm Crisis; Illinois; Indiana; Iowa; Kansas; Michigan; Minnesota; Missouri; Nebraska; North Dakota; Ohio; Response Patterns; South Dakota; *United States (North Central); Wisconsin ABSTRACT The 12 states comprising the North Central Region have been affected in similar ways by the farm crisis of the 1980s. Statewide surveys show sizeable proportions of farm operations that are experiencing moderately high levels of financial stress. The problems caused by chronic stress on family structure and functioning, the loss of mainstreet businesses, and bank closing are felt throughout the region. The Cooperative Extension Agencies in the states have approached the problems in similar ways. They have developed new programs with long- and short-term efforts, and they have adapted existing programs with short-term or temporary activities and long-term commitments. Extension has been most heavily involved iu developing new, relatively short-term programs such as the use of hotlines, crisis intervention teams, and bankrupcy or bank closing response teams.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 IDOA Annual Report
    STATE of ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Robert F. Flider, Acting Director ILLINOIS CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP ANNUAL REPORT 2011 BUREAU OF LAND AND WATER RESOURCES Pat Quinn, Governor Robert F. Flider, Acting Director _____________________________________________________________________________ Office of the Director State Fairgrounds ● P.O. Box 19281 ● Springfield, IL 62794-9281 ● 217/782-2172 ●TDD 217/524-6858 ●Fax 217/785-4505 Dear Friend: The conservation and wise use of our natural resources is paramount to achieving and maintaining the high standard of living that most Americans enjoy today. Illinois is blessed with extraordinary natural resources that include some of the most productive soils in the world and large amounts of high quality water resources that make our neighbors in the western United States envious. However, these world class natural resources are not limitless and all of us need to take steps to protect our soil and water resources for current and future generations. I am very proud of the work carried out by the Members of Illinois Natural Resources Conservation Partnership shown in this annual report. This document provides a synopsis of current work being implemented and highlights the progress Illinois landowners have made in preserving the State’s priceless natural resources. The Partnership works hand-in-hand with rural and urban landowners on developing and implementing conservation practices that benefit the environment. While today’s strained budgets present numerous challenges, be assured that the Illinois Department of Agriculture and our conservation partners remain committed to providing effective natural resource management assistance to Illinois’ citizens. To learn what you can do to help with the conservation of our finite natural resources, feel free to contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District, the Illinois Department of Agriculture, or any of the other conservation partners listed on the inside of the back cover of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • 94 Stat. 3228 Public Law 96-550—Dec
    PUBLIC LAW 96-550—DEC. 19, 1980 94 STAT. 3221 Public Law 96-550 96th Congress An Act To designate certein National Forest System lands in the State of New Mexico for Dec. 19, 1980 inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System, and for other [H.R. 8298] purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, National Forest System lands, N. Mex. TITLE I Designation. SEC. 101. The purposes of this Act are to— (1) designate certain National Forest System lands in New Mexico for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System in order to promote, perpetuate, and preserve the wilder­ ness character of the land, to protect watersheds and wildlife habitat, preserve scenic and historic resources, and to promote scientific research, primitive recreation, solitude, physical and mental challenge, and inspiration for the benefit of all the American people; (2) insure that certain other National Forest System lands in New Mexico be promptly available for nonwilderness uses including, but not limited to, campground and other recreation site development, timber harvesting, intensive range manage­ ment, mineral development, and watershed and vegetation manipulation; and (3) designate certain other National Forest System land in New Mexico for further study in furtherance of the purposes of the Wilderness Act. 16 use 1131 SEC. 102. (a) In furtherance of the purposes of the Wilderness Act, note. the following National Forest System lands in the State of New Mexico are hereby designated as wilderness, and therefore, as compo­ nents of the National Wilderness Preservation System— (1) certain lands in the Gila National Forest, New Mexico, 16 use 1132 which comprise approximately two hundred and eleven thou­ note.
    [Show full text]