DOCSLIB.ORG

Jan/Feb 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jan/Feb 2020 NNoo UncertainUncertain TermsTerms THE NEWSLETTER OF THE TERM LIMITS MOVEMENT • JANUARY/FEBRUARY • VOLUME 28 • No. 1 With 20-10 Vote, West Virginia Senate Passes Resolution to Call Term Limits Convention On January 22, the West Virginia Senate passed Senate that lawmakers will pass a call for a Term Limits Conven- Concurrent Resolution 4 (SCR4) calling for an Article V tion: Arizona, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, term limits convention. Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Utah, West Virginia (thank The vote was 20 to 10 with 4 abstentions. (You can see you, WV Senate), and Wisconsin. These are states where a the roll call at bit.ly/2RDeR5H .) resolution has been introduced in the 2020 session or where “Today’s vote was the right thing to do,” said Senator we expect that one will be fi led shortly. Randy Smith, lead sponsor of the resolution. It had 14 Of these ten, Nick Tomboulides has named the legisla- cosponsors. “Congress is a mess. If what’s happening now tures of fi ve states as our top targets this year: West Virgin- doesn’t concern you, then nothing will. This is all about ia, Arizona, giving power back to the people.” Utah, Geor- U.S. Term Limits Executive Director Nick Tomboulides gia, and has hailed the efforts of various state senators, including Louisiana. Senator Patricia Rucker, who countered ill-informed fears The in the judiciary committee about a “runaway convention” resolution by simply reading Article V of the U.S. Constitution to her has yet to colleagues. pass either An Article V amendment convention devoted to the chamber single subject of congressional term limits would produce in Louisi- an amendment that can be ratifi ed by the states even if ana. But Congress never proposes such an amendment. As stipulated we have West Virginia State Senator Randy in Article V, if 34 states pass resolutions calling for such a seen strong Smith makes a case. convention, Congress must convene it. If 38 states ratify an support for amendment proposed by the convention, it becomes part of it there, including 16 signatories so far of our Term Limits the U.S. Constitution. Convention Pledge. A companion bill introduced in the West Virginia house In Utah, the resolution passed in the Utah house in a pre- by Delegate Jeff Pack (HCR 22) has 43 cosponsors. vious session, but not yet in the senate. In 2019, West Virginia senators were prevented from vot- A resolution calling for a Term Limits Convention has ing on the resolution. A fl oor vote was delayed until late in twice passed the Arizona house and also enjoys strong the session. Then, as midnight approached on the very last support in the senate. Twenty-seven Arizona lawmakers day of that session, an opponent of term limits fi libustered have signed the Term Limits Convention Pledge, but Senate to run out the clock. The 2019 session adjourned before the President Karen Fann has yet to bring the resolution to a vote could be held. vote. Yet Fann is a pledge signer herself, so she understands Since then, USTL team members Aaron Dukette and the importance and appeal of congressional term limits. To Shanna Chamblee have been working to expand our al- help us get over the fi nish line in Arizona, we invite read- ready strong bipartisan support in West Virginia. Almost 60 ers who live there to politely urge Senate President Fann to West Virginia lawmakers have signed the U.S. Term Limits schedule a fl oor vote. Convention Pledge to back the resolution. All we needed In Georgia, the resolution passed in the Georgia senate was a vote. in the last session, but not in the house. Fortunately, pro- In 2020, U.S. Term Limits is devoting our energy to ten ponents of the Term Limits Convention do not need to win state leg- another senate vote this year. Since Georgia has, in effect, Hog works to save Michigan islatures a two-year legislative session, the 2019 senate vote carries from scheme to trash term limits. where we over into 2020. But we do need a house victory this year to See page 3. see a good match the senate victory, or we’ll have to start over in both chance chambers. No Uncertain Terms - U.S. Term Limits Foundation 1250 Connecticut Ave. NW Suite 200 • Washington, DC 20036 President’s Corner By Philip Blumel Our page 3 story about the battle for term limits in Michigan quotes Scott Tillman saying that lobbyists hate term limits. Which is pretty confusing, isn’t it? I always hear that lobbyists love term limits! It’s because of all the extra power they supposedly get because of term limits. The former Michigan lawmakers who are currently suing to overturn state legislative term limits claim in their legal fi ling that term limits have “increased the infl uence of lobbyists and special interest groups.” We are supposed to believe that lobbyists love term limits even more than they love entrenched incumbents whom they can count on for decades at a time. Of course, no large, broadly defi ned group is monolithic in the traits and perspectives of its members. We here at U.S. Term Limits are lobbyists too, after all. We “conduct activities aimed at infl uencing public offi cials and especially members of a legislative body on legislation” (Merriam-Webster). When we lobby lawmakers, we are asking them to enact or protect term limits. So, yes, we are lobbyists who love term limits. Found them! Nor are we alone. Many surveys indicate that not all lobbyists oppose term limits. Just most of them. I believe that at least some lobbyists who benefi t from long-term incumbency also do recognize the democratic value of term limits, even if they don’t wave placards about it when their boss is in the room. But the point is that most lobbyists do in fact oppose term limits. They really don’t appreciate having periodic new opportunities to tutor newcomers. They fi nd the constant changing of the guard to be terribly inconvenient. Yet critics of term limits say, repeatedly, that term limits are dangerous because they “empower” lobbyists, who supposedly can treat freshman lawmakers like putty in their hands. It ain’t so. U.S. Term Limits has been around since 1991, and we have participated in many election battles and courtroom battles. Lobbying fi rms and special interests with business before the legislature have always provided the money to try to defeat, weaken, or abolish term limits. There are no exceptions. Can we agree that when lobbyists fi ght term limits, which they do at every opportunity, their goal is not to reduce their own infl uence on the political system? Listen to Phil Blumel and Nick Tomboulides every week on the No Uncertain Terms podcast, archived at termlimits.com/podcast. Visit our Facebook page at on.fb.me/U0blkG. Visit termlimits.com/petition to sign up for email updates about U.S. Term Limits. JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2020 For the latest developments on term limits across America, visit our “It is not the function of our A publication of web site on the Internet at Government to keep the citizen www.termlimits.org US TERM from falling into error; it is the LIMITS FOUNDATION No Uncertain Terms is published function of the citizen to keep the Government from falling U.S. Term Limits – DC Offi ce bimonthly. Third class postage paid, 1250 Connecticut Avenue NW Washington, DC. into error.” Suite 200 Washington, DC 20036 POSTMASTER: -- U.S. Supreme Court in (202) 261-3532 – Phone Send address changes to: U.S. Term Limits Foundation American Communications 1250 Connecticut Avenue NW Association v. Douds [email protected] – Email Suite 200 www.termlimits.org – Web Washington, DC 20036 2 No Uncertain Terms - U.S. Term Limits Foundation 1250 Connecticut Ave. NW Suite 200 • Washington, DC 20036 Perfect Symbol of Power-Hungry Foes of Term Limits Tours Michigan to Alert “Positive and Supportive” Citizens Michigan Hog “Nothing makes lobbyists squeal like losing legislators would be cobbled together with various plausible reforms in to term limits,” says Scott Tillman, state coordinator of the the hope that voters will either miss or forgive the fact that one Michigan organization Don’t Touch Term Limits! “We want of the “reforms” in the measure is just not like the others. politicians to know that the people of Michigan love our term Meanwhile, a group of disgruntled lobbyists who for- limits. Term limits were merly served as Michigan introduced by citizens, not lawmakers have sued to politicians. It is a confl ict of overturn term limits, claim- interest for our politicians ing that state legislative term to meddle with the people’s limits are unconstitutional term limits.” with respect to both the state Under the aegis of constitution and the U.S. Don’t Touch Term Limits!, Constitution. The former Michigan residents Scott accusation is especially Tillman, national fi eld direc- bizarre, since Michigan vot- tor for USTL, and his father ers passed term limits in the Jeff Tillman, deputy fi eld form of an amendment to director for USTL, have the state constitution. Duly been alerting fellow Michi- enacted amendments to the ganders to the threat to term state constitution are part of limits posed by current and the state constitution. former Lansing incumbents. Jeff Tillman’s tireless Their ally in this en- tour of the state, giant hog deavor is an 18-foot-high in tow, has done a lot to get Jeff Tillman with an 18-foot hog representing the gluttony for hog that Jeff has been haul- unlimited tenure of many Michigan lawmakers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Voters in CA, WA and ID Reject Efforts to Gut Local Zoning and Environmental Protections
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: November 8, 2006 Voters in CA, WA and ID Reject Efforts to Gut Local Zoning and Environmental Protections Using eminent domain as Trojan Horse fails to fool most voters CONTACT: Alex Goldschmidt, Smart Growth America, (202) 207-3355 x112, [email protected] Washington, DC – Voters in three key Western states Tuesday resoundingly rejected anti-taxpayer measures that sought to hamstring communities’ efforts to manage growth and protect property values and the environment. Foisted onto the ballots with millions from New York real estate mogul Howard Rich and his allied groups, the measures in California, Washington and Idaho would have mimicked a 2004 measure from Oregon, requiring taxpayers to pay landowners when a zoning or environmental protection reduced their speculative profits. If taxpayers couldn’t pay they would have to waive the rules, solely for those landowners. “Voters know their communities need to be able to make sound, local decisions in order to protect our neighborhoods, clean water and quality of life,” said Don Chen, executive director of Smart Growth America. “While our coalition doggedly defends the rights of individual property owners, these measures were really about crippling community planning and creating windfalls for certain speculators.” Only one of the four pay-or-waive measures, Arizona’s Proposition 207, was approved. There, Rich and company deceptively claimed the initiative was limited to restricting the use of eminent domain, and under-funded opponents lacked the resources to unmask the ruse amid 18 other ballot initiatives. Rich poured $1.5 million into the effort to undermine Arizona’s capacity to deal with its rapid growth and protect the state’s military bases from encroaching development.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Ballot Measure Overview
    2006 BALLOT MEASURE OVERVIEW AN A NALYSIS O F TH E MON EY RAISED A RO UND MEASU RES O N STA TE BA LLO TS I N 2006 By THE N ATIO NA L IN STI TU TE O N MON EY IN STA TE PO LI TI CS NOVEMBER 5, 2007 833 NORTH LAST CHANCE GULCH, SECOND FLOOR • HELENA, MT • 59601 PHONE 406-449-2480 • FAX 406-457-2091 • E-MAIL [email protected] www.followthemoney.org The National Institute on Money in State Politics is the only nonpartisan, nonprofit organization revealing the influence of campaign money on state-level elections and public policy in all 50 states. Our comprehensive and verifiable campaign-finance database and relevant issue analyses are available for free through our Web site FollowTheMoney.org. We encourage transparency and promote independent investigation of state-level campaign contributions by journalists, academic researchers, public-interest groups, government agencies, policymakers, students and the public at large. 833 North Last Chance Gulch, Second Floor • Helena, MT 59601 Phone: 406-449-2480 • Fax: 406-457-2091 E-mail: [email protected] www.FollowTheMoney.org This publication was made possible by grants from: JEHT Foundation, Fair and Participatory Elections Carnegie Corporation of New York, Strengthening U.S. Democracy Ford Foundation, Program on Governance and Civil Society The Pew Charitable Trusts, State Policy Initiatives Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Program on Democratic Practice The statements made and the views expressed are solely the responsibility of the Institute. National Institute on Money in State Politics
    [Show full text]
  • How and Why Idaho Terminated Term Limits Scott .W Reed
    Idaho Law Review Volume 50 | Number 3 Article 1 October 2014 How and Why Idaho Terminated Term Limits Scott .W Reed Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho-law-review Recommended Citation Scott .W Reed, How and Why Idaho Terminated Term Limits, 50 Idaho L. Rev. 1 (2014). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho-law-review/vol50/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ UIdaho Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Idaho Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ UIdaho Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOW AND WHY IDAHO TERMINATED TERM LIMITS SCOTT W. REED1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 1 II. THE 1994 INITIATIVE ...................................................................... 2 A. Origin of Initiatives for Term Limits ......................................... 3 III. THE TERM LIMITS HAVE POPULAR APPEAL ........................... 5 A. Term Limits are a Conservative Movement ............................. 6 IV. TERM LIMITS VIOLATE FOUR STATE CONSTITUTIONS ....... 7 A. Massachusetts ............................................................................. 8 B. Washington ................................................................................. 9 C. Wyoming ...................................................................................... 9 D. Oregon ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report, 2018-19
    ANNUAL REPORT 2018-19 FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2019 “We are embarking on a forward trajectory that positions Howard University as a model of excellence, in a contemporary context, across everything we do, from academics to operations to fulfilling our legacy and mission of truth and service. This plan outlines our bold strategy to provide a quality educational experience while also doubling down on our commitment to produce distinguished global leaders.” PRESIDENT WAYNE A. I. FREDERICK, M.D., MBA 1 HISTORY OF HOWARD UNIVERSITY 2 LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN 3 LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT 5 THE YEAR IN REVIEW 13 STUDENT ACCOLADES 21 HIGH-PROFILE VISITORS 29 ACADEMIC AND RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS 35 NEW APPOINTMENTS 39 STUDENT ENROLLMENT 41 FINANCIALS 47 BOARD OF TRUSTEES 48 ADMINISTRATION b HOWARD UNIVERSITY 2018-2019 ANNUAL REPORT HISTORY OF HOWARD UNIVERSITY Since 1867, Howard has awarded more than 100,000 acre facility in northwest Washington and a 108-acre tract of degrees in the professions, arts, sciences and humanities. land in Beltsville, MD. Howard ranks among the highest producers of the nation’s Black professionals in medicine, dentistry, pharmacy, Howard prepares men and women to advance social justice engineering, nursing, architecture, religion, law, music, social and the preservation of human liberty. In each of its 13 schools work and education. and colleges, Howard University seeks to develop technically competent and morally committed individuals. The University’s The University has long held a commitment to the study of library system contains more than 1.8 million volumes, disadvantaged persons in American society and throughout including the Channing Pollock Collection.
    [Show full text]
  • © Copyright 2020 Yunkang Yang
    © Copyright 2020 Yunkang Yang The Political Logic of the Radical Right Media Sphere in the United States Yunkang Yang A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2020 Reading Committee: W. Lance Bennett, Chair Matthew J. Powers Kirsten A. Foot Adrienne Russell Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Communication University of Washington Abstract The Political Logic of the Radical Right Media Sphere in the United States Yunkang Yang Chair of the Supervisory Committee: W. Lance Bennett Department of Communication Democracy in America is threatened by an increased level of false information circulating through online media networks. Previous research has found that radical right media such as Fox News and Breitbart are the principal incubators and distributors of online disinformation. In this dissertation, I draw attention to their political mobilizing logic and propose a new theoretical framework to analyze major radical right media in the U.S. Contrasted with the old partisan media literature that regarded radical right media as partisan news organizations, I argue that media outlets such as Fox News and Breitbart are better understood as hybrid network organizations. This means that many radical right media can function as partisan journalism producers, disinformation distributors, and in many cases political organizations at the same time. They not only provide partisan news reporting but also engage in a variety of political activities such as spreading disinformation, conducting opposition research, contacting voters, and campaigning and fundraising for politicians. In addition, many radical right media are also capable of forming emerging political organization networks that can mobilize resources, coordinate actions, and pursue tangible political goals at strategic moments in response to the changing political environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources/ Credits
    SNAKE, THE PLAIN AND ITS PEOPLE SOURCES/CRED ITS SOURCES/ CREDITS SE LECTIVE BI BLI OG RAP HY AN D SOU RCES OF TH E QUOTATIONS C H. 1: SEE I N G THE LA N D in Idaho," U.S. Geological Survey BlI lletin, I Park," U.S. Geological Survey Profess ional no. 199 (1902); State of Idaho, Dept. of Paper, no. 729-B (1972); CreIghton, D.N;; Alt, David D.,and Donald W. Hynd­ Agri culture, 1989 Agriculture Statistics "Menan Buttes, Southeas tern IdahD, man, Roadside GeologJ) of Idaho (1989) ; (1989); Stearns, Harold T., "Origins of the Rocky Mounta lJ1 SectIon of the Geologica I Arrington, Leonard L "Irrigation SOCiety of America, Centen11lal Field In the Snake River Valley: An H is- Guide, 2 (1 987):109-] 1; Doh erty, D.J., torical Overview," idaho Yesterdays L.A McBroome, and M.A Kuntz, 30 (Summer /Sp ring 1986):3-11 "Preliminary Geologic Interpreta­ ["They thought I was crazy" quote ti on and Lithologic Log of the Ex­ from p . 8]; Bartlett, Ri chard, Great ploratoryTest Well (1 EL-1 ), Idaho Surveys of the AlI1ericall West (1962); National Engineering Laboratory, Buwulda, John P., "A Preliminary Eastern Snake River Plain, Idaho," Reconnaissance of the Gas and Oil U.S. Geological Survey Open File Re­ Possibilities of Southwestern and port, no. 79-1248 (1979); Hackett, South-Central Idaho," Idaho Bureau W.R , and L.A.Morgan, "Explosive of Mines al1d Geology, pamphlet 5 Basaltic and Rhyolitic Volcanism of (July 1923) ["unfavorable" quote the Eastern Sna ke River Plain," from p. 10]; Gazin, C.
    [Show full text]
  • Free Libertarian
    FREE LIBERTARIAN Monthly Newsletter of the Free Libertarian Party VOL. 2, N0.1 1 JANUARY 1973 HOSPERS/NATHAN 3RD IN ELECTORALVOTES John Hospers, the Libertarian Party candidate for President, finished third in the presidential election receiving one electoral vote from Robert MacBride, an at­ torney from Charlottsville, Virginia. The one electoral vote FLP-EINDS HOME placed Hospers and his running mate Toni Nathan 16 votes behind Democrat George McGovern of South Dakota. The Free Libertarian Party of New York has finally found a ·permanent home. The party headquarters are moving to: Robert MacBride, a lifelong Republican, stated: "In casting my vote for another can_didate I am trying to tell 15 West 38th St., New York City 10018 (President Nixon) that he has lost his way; that this country should not move to a controlled mercantilistic economy .. " He further stated that he voted for the Libertarians "on behalf where we will have permanent office space, mailing address of the millions in this country who have helplessly watched and telephone listing. The telephone number will be an­ presidential leadership inexorably move the federal nounced in the next newsletter, and hopefully will be listed government in the direction of ever-greater control over the by Ma Bell in the directory. One never knows, but members lives of all of us." are urged to ask Ma anyway. Toni Nathan thus became the first woman to ever receive Anyone with electrical, carpentry, design or other skills is an electoral vote. Several women's magazines are now urged to contact Howard Rich at (212) 299-0686.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Print Viewer 11/17/10 11:27 AM
    Multi-Print Viewer 11/17/10 11:27 AM Oregon, 6 other states blanketed in records bid Oregonian, The (Portland, OR) - Saturday, October 7, 2006 Author: GOSIA WOZNIACKA, The Oregonian SUMMARY: FOIA | A group wants e-mail pertaining to property rights and spending limits, an effort that will cost time and money Close to 500 cities, school districts and state agencies in Oregon, and thousands more in six other states, have been hit with public records requests for all e-mails pertaining to any communication regarding measures on term limits, property rights or limiting spending, an undertaking most local municipalities say will take months and thousands of dollars to complete. A Virginia-based group, Citizens in Charge, is mounting what its Web site calls "a study of public resource abuse" under the name CitizenFOIA (FOIA stands for Freedom of Information Act). Citizens in Charge is aiming its campaign, which also includes requests for Internet and e-mail use policies and their enforcement, at Oregon and other states where groups backed by Howard Rich, the head of Americans for Limited Government and U.S. Term Limits, pushed spending limits or property rights measures this year. Citizens In Charge's president, Paul Jacob, says his group is nonpartisan. "Our goal is basically to find out to what degree public resources are being used for political campaigning and to make sure those resources are not abused," he said. Oregon election law forbids public employees to send, forward, copy or distribute e-mail that supports or opposes a political committee, election petition, candidate or measure.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report, 2009-10
    ANNUAL REPORT | 2009-2010 Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010 A Legacy Renewed “Howard University occupies a unique niche in higher education both in terms of its remarkable legacy and future potential. It is quite literally a national treasure as the foremost research university ensuring the education of African American leaders for the nation and the world.” – Middle States Commission on Higher Education 1 HOWARD UNIVERSITY | ANNUAL REPORT | 2009-2010 1 LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN 1 LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT 3 THE YEAR IN REVIEW 15 ACADEMICS & SERVICE 16 CREATING A LEGACY FOR THE 21ST CENTURY 29 OPERATION AND SUPPORT 35 FINANCIALS 40 ADMINISTRATION 41 BOARD OF TRUSTEES 2 A LegacyRenewed LETTERS FROM THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND THE PRESIDENT OF HOWARD UNIVERSITY Dear Friends: Dear Friends: oward, since its inception, his report chronicles what has occupied a unique place has been a very exciting year. in the history of America. We celebrated significant HLong before it was fashionable, this Taccomplishments of our students and University was trumpeting the right faculty and took steps on an important of every citizen—irrespective of gender, journey. This journey engaged the race, ethnicity or religion—to a good entire University community in education and the opportunity to strategic priorities: academic renewal, fulfill his/her potential. More than many other institutions, financial stability, institutional effectiveness and development Howard is the forerunner of this modern ethos of of leadership talent. These priorities have focused the multiculturalism which everyone now seeks to embrace. community on continued excellence in teaching and With so much resilience and vision, it is not surprising that learning, an enhanced status as a major research university, this relatively small institution has had such a profound an expanded international footprint and an expanded public impact on the world, measured by its role in the civil rights service role to underserved communities.
    [Show full text]
  • American Politics: a Very Short Introduction
    American Politics: A Very Short Introduction VERY SHORT INTRODUCTIONS are for anyone wanting a stimulating and accessible way in to a new subject. They are written by experts and have been published in more than 25 languages worldwide. The series began in 1995 and now represents a wide variety of topics in history, philosophy, religion, science, and the humanities. The VSI library now contains more than 300 volumes—a Very Short Introduction to everything from ancient Egypt and Indian philosophy to conceptual art and cosmology—and will continue to grow in a variety of disciplines. V e r y S h o r t I n t r o d u c t i o n s a v a i l a b l e n o w : ADVERTISING Winston Fletcher ART HISTORY Dana Arnold AFRICAN HISTORY John Parker and ART THEORY Cynthia Freeland Richard Rathbone ATHEISM Julian Baggini AGNOSTICISM Robin Le Poidevin AUGUSTINE Henry Chadwick AMERICAN HISTORY Paul S. Boyer AUSTRALIA Kenneth Morgan AMERICAN IMMIGRATION AUTISM Uta Frith David A. Gerber THE AZTECS Davíd Carrasco AMERICAN POLITICAL PARTIES BARTHES Jonathan Culler AND ELECTIONS L. Sandy Maisel BEAUTY Roger Scruton THE AMERICAN PRESIDENCY BESTSELLERS John Sutherland Charles O. Jones THE BIBLE John Riches ANAESTHESIA Aidan O’Donnell BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGY Eric H. Cline ANARCHISM Colin Ward BIOGRAPHY Hermione Lee ANCIENT EGYPT Ian Shaw THE BLUES Elijah Wald ANCIENT GREECE Paul Cartledge THE BOOK OF MORMON ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY Julia Annas Terryl Givens ANCIENT WARFARE Harry Sidebottom BORDERS Alexander C. Diener and ANGELS David Albert Jones Joshua Hagen ANGLICANISM Mark
    [Show full text]
  • The Legislative Administrator
    The Legislative Administrator The Official Newsletter of the American Society of Legislative Clerks and Secretaries Winter 2007 ASLCS President’s Message Dear Friends, It is truly an honor to be serving as your president this year and I look forward to working with each and every one of you. My goal is to involve as many members of the Society as possible as we strive to preserve our institution and its legacy. At the Table of Contents same time, I know we must also change to meet the new and challenging demands of our jobs. The confidence you have placed in me as your President is President’s Message ..............................1 humbling, and I thank you. Executive Committee Minutes ................3 I am humbled because of the many talented leaders who have preceded me. I am humbled Annual Business Minutes .......................5 because close to 300 colleagues are a part of the greatest staff section of NCSL and their Retirements: expectations are high. And I am humbled because I consider you my friends and family and Linda Hawker .........................................7 along with that comes a great deal of responsibility. David Kneale ........................................10 First, I want to extend a huge thank you to Patsy Spaw, Robert Haney and their staff for a Committee Membership and Minutes fantastic time in Austin. Working with George Bishop and the Program Committee they Bylaws and Standing Orders ...........14 planned an incredible professional development seminar. The social events were very Canadian-American Relations ..........15 entertaining, from Esther’s Follies to the wildlife refuge. They provided a necessary balance Inside the Legislative Process ..........17 International Communication to the plenary and concurrent sessions and hopefully everyone left with some ideas they can and Development .............................18 implement back home.
    [Show full text]
  • Etn1980 01.Pdf
    Volume 26, No. 1 February 1, 1980 • THE INDOOR CIRCUIT • SASKATCHEWAN K of C • • • 3000(1 lap extra run),Waitz"(Nor) 8: 50.8 • HJ, Jacobs ( F Dick) 7-5½; 2. Stones (AA) (single watch "offlcial"time) WR (old WR, 7-4¼ (1st competition in 19 months); 3. Ko­ Saskatoon, Sask., Dec. 28(a)29(b) /125m 8: 57.6 Merrill [US) '78) (4:23,0m, 4:42.1y, tinek (PCC) 7·¾; 4. Fields (PPC) 7-¾; 5. Mc• banked board/-300m(b), Wiley (DCI) 34.3 (7, 5:51.5m-all Waitz); 2. Merrill (AGAA) Daniel (AA) 7-¾; 6. Gibbs (unat) 7-¾; 7. Bal• 9 a-t W; 5, 7 a-t US). 400(a), Sowerby (DCI· 9:07.5 (single watch time). kin (UCLA) 6-10¾; •.• nh-Frazier (Az). PV, Ant) 49.0; ..• dnf-Hampton (BAS). 500m(a), 50mH, 1-1. Hawthorne (Cal) 7.71. 11·1. Bel I (What) 17-6; 2. Haynie (Tob) 17•0; 3. Priestley (DCI-Jam) 1:05.2; ... dnf-Harris(EOC). Anderson ( LAN) 7.44; 2. Johnson (Stan Tully ( I AA) 17-0; 4. Brown (unat) 17-0; 5. 600y(b), Newhouse (Can) 1:12.0; 2. Cooper TC) 7.54; 3. Costello (Or) 7.66; 4. Sanders Baird (I AA-Aus) 16-6; 6. Jessee (PPC) 16-6. (BAS) 1: 12.9; 3. Person (Md) 1: 13.0. (Ca HS) 7. 71. 4 x 440, LA Mercurettes e LJ, Myricks (AA) 26-6 (26-3½, 25·6¼, f, f, B00(a), Reindl (Can) 1:53.7. Mile(b), Childs 3: 52.1 (Gutowski, Mitchell, Peterson, Gard- 26-2¼, 26-6); 2.
    [Show full text]