The Placement of the Spider Genus Periegops and the Phylogeny of Scytodoidea (Araneae: Araneomorphae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Placement of the Spider Genus Periegops and the Phylogeny of Scytodoidea (Araneae: Araneomorphae) Zootaxa 3312: 1–44 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) The placement of the spider genus Periegops and the phylogeny of Scytodoidea (Araneae: Araneomorphae) FACUNDO M. LABARQUE1 & MARTÍN J. RAMÍREZ1 1Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Av. Ángel Gallardo 470, C1405DJR, Buenos Aires, Argentina. [email protected] / [email protected] Abstract The relationships of Scytodoidea, including the families Drymusidae, Periegopidae, Scytodidae and Sicariidae, have been con- tentious for a long time. Here we present a reviewed phylogenetic analysis of scytodoid spiders, emphasizing Periegops, the only genus in the family Periegopidae. In our analysis the Scytodoidea are united by the fusion of the third abdominal entapo- physes into a median lobe, the presence of female palpal femoral thorns and associated cheliceral stridulatory ridges, a mem- branous lobe on the cheliceral promargin, and the loss of minor ampullate gland spigots. A basal split within Scytodoidea defines two monophyletic groups: Sicariidae and a group formed by Scytodidae as the sister group of Periegopidae plus Dry- musidae, all united by having bipectinate prolateral claws on tarsi I–II, one major ampullate spigot accompanied by a nubbin, and the posterior median spinnerets with a mesal field of spicules. Periegops is the sister group of Drymusidae, united by the regain of promarginal cheliceral teeth and a triangular cheliceral lamina, which is continuous with the paturon margin. Key words: Drymusa, Drymusidae, Haplogyne, morphology, Scytodes, Stedocys, Scytodidae, Sicariidae, Sicarius, Loxosceles Introduction The family Periegopidae currently comprises only the genus Periegops, with two species: the type species Perie- gops suteri (Urquhart) from the Banks Peninsula on the South Island of New Zealand (Vink 2006), and Periegops australia Forster, from southeastern Queensland (Forster 1995). A single female of an unidentified Periegops spe- cies from the East Cape region of the North Island of New Zealand was also mentioned by Forster (1995); at pres- ent, the delimitation of species within Periegops is dependent on the detailed structure of the male copulatory bulb, hence the identification of this specimen should wait for new data, although mitochondrial COI molecular evidence suggests that it may be a distinct species (unpublished data mentioned in Vink 2006). The genus Periegops was first included in the subfamily Periegopinae by Simon (1893), and placed in the Sicariidae, along with Drymusinae, Loxoscelinae, Plectreurinae, Scytodinae and Sicariinae. Simon was the first to discover that Periegops and Scytodes had a bipectinate “external superior” tarsal claw on the anterior tarsi. Simon included Diguetia and Pertica (later synonymized with Segestrioides; Brescovit & Rheims 2005) in Periegopinae, but Petrunkevitch (1928) removed them and placed them into Diguetinae. Bryant (1935a, b) suggested a family rank for Periegops that included also Plectreurys and Diguetia, but she took no formal action. Lehtinen (1986) studied only the female holotype of P. suteri. He mentioned that Periegopidae, Drymusidae, Scytodidae and Ochyroceratidae share a particular dentition pattern in the tarsal claws, but he never explained or described this character in detail, so his observations were not conclusive. He also suggested that Periegops could be a strongly apomorphic derivative of the classical (non-monophyletic, Platnick et al. 1991), Scytodoidea, com- posed of the Caponiidae, Diguetidae, Loxoscelidae, Ochyroceratidae, Plectreuridae, Pholcidae, Scytodidae, Sicari- idae and Tetrablemmidae (Brignoli 1975, 1978). Platnick et al. (1991) investigated the spinneret morphology of haplogyne araneomorph spiders (Haplogynae), and produced a cladistic analysis with all haplogyne families except Periegopidae. They obtained a restricted Scyt- odoidea, composed of Sicariidae, Scytodidae, and Drymusidae, in which Scytodidae and Drymusidae were united Accepted by W. Fannes: 29 Dec. 2011; published: 14 May 2012 1 by having a field of spicules on the median surface of the posterior median spinnerets. Ramírez (2000) added a few characters from the respiratory system to the same dataset, further strengthening Platnick et al.’s hypothesis. Gris- wold et al. (2005) reviewed most of the character systems used in those sources, but only scored two families of Haplogynae (Filistatidae and Segestriidae) as outgroups for their analysis. Forster (1995) was the first to examine the tracheal system of Periegops, and their cuticular structures using scanning electron microscopy. He hypothesized that the Periegopidae were related to the ecribellate, haplogyne families Diguetidae, Drymusidae, Plectreuridae, Scytodidae and Sicariidae (that is, Simon’s Sicariidae, plus Diguetidae). Within this group, Forster suggested that Periegopidae was most closely related to the Scytodidae, based on two characters: (a) posterior tracheal system composed of a short median apodemal lobe and a distinct pair of simple lateral tracheae, a configuration also shared with Drymusidae; and (b) a double row of teeth on the ventral surface of the proclaws, and a single row on the retroclaws of leg I and II (later found in Drymusa as well, see below). Lamy (1902) was the first to describe the tracheae of Scytodes and Loxosceles, which both share a fused median apodeme. Ramírez (2000) confirmed that at least in Loxosceles and Sicarius the median lobe retained the muscle insertions corresponding to the paired third abdominal entapophyses, proposing their fusion on a median structure as a further synapomorphy for a clade that included Drymusa, Loxosceles, Scytodes and Sicarius (plus Periegops, although this genus was not included in the analysis). In the cladistic analysis of Ramírez (2000), the elongation of the median apodeme is a synapomorphy for Sicariidae, thus a short median apodeme is ple- siomorphic for Scytodes, Drymusa, and Periegops. Labarque & Ramírez (2007a) reported that the bipectinate pro- claws are also present in Drymusa, and that Periegops also have a field of spicules on the median surface of the posterior median spinnerets (PMS), along with Drymusa and Scytodes. In summary, the more promising characters that may help resolve the closest relationships of Periegops (the bipectinate proclaws, the spicules on the PMS), are shared both with Dymusa and Scytodes. Here we intend to clar- ify the relationships of Periegops and its relatives performing a cladistic analysis of Scytodoid spiders, reviewing and expanding on the previous analyses (Platnick et al. 1991; Ramírez 2000; Griswold et al. 2005). Material and methods Specimen preparation Clean museum specimens were chosen when available. Specimens in 80% alcohol were imaged with a Nikon DXM1200 digital camera mounted on a stereoscopic microscope Nikon SMZ1500 and the focal planes composed with Helicon Focus 3.10.3 and 4.01 Pro (Khmelik et al. 2006). Preparations were carefully cleaned using fine brushes, a thin jet of alcohol from a thinned pipette, or ultrasonic cleaner; some setae were removed to expose structures, especially those on legs and palp, spinnerets and chelicerae. For scanning electron microscope (SEM), all preparations were dehydrated in a series of increasing concentrations of ethanol (80%, 90%, 95%, 100%), and critical-point dried. After drying and brushing, they were mounted on adhesive copper tape (Electron Microscopy Sciences, EMS 77802) affixed to a stub and secured with a conductive paint of colloidal graphite on isopropyl alco- hol base (EMS 12660). Prior to SEM examination under high vacuum with a FEI XL30 TMP, the structures were sputter-coated with Au-Pd. Material examined The following specimens were examined to score the phylogenetic dataset. See Acknowledgements for a list of institutional acronyms and curators. Hypochilus pococki Platnick: 1 ♀, USA, North Carolina, Swain Co., Great Smokey Mountains, Deep Creek Campground, 0.3 Km along Stone Pile Trial, 585 m, N 35°27.848', W 83°26.078', J. Bond, F. Coyle coll., 19.X.2002, MACN-Ar 28173 (ARAMR-000641). 1 ♂, same data, MACN-Ar 29171 (ARAMR-000642). Kukulcania hibernalis (Hentz): 1 ♀, ARGENTINA, Capital Federal, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, M. Ramírez, C. Grismado, A. Ojanguren-Afilastro coll., 6.I.2004, MACN-Ar 10427 (ARAMR-000701). 1 ♂, same locality, M. Ramírez col., 16.I.2003, MACN-Ar 10422 (ARAMR-000075). Ariadna boesenbergi Keyserling: 1 ♀, ARGENTINA, Buenos Aires, Ruta Pergamino, Arrecifes Km 210, S. Rodríguez Gil col., XI.2007, MACN-Ar 28170 (ARAMR-000966). 1 ♂, ARGENTINA, Capital Federal, M. Miranda col., I.1989, MACN-Ar 10177 (ARAMR-000965). 2 · Zootaxa 3312 © 2012 Magnolia Press FACUNDO M. LABARQUE Pholcus phalangioides (Fuesslin): 1 ♂, 1 ♀ and 3 immatures, ARGENTINA, Misiones, Santa María, De Carlo, Schiapelli, Viana, Galiano, coll., XI.1954, MACN-Ar 4337. Sicarius rupestris (Holmberg): 2 ♀, ARGENTINA, San Juan, Ruta 150, camino a Paso de Agua Negra, 6 km Oeste de Arrequintín, Maury col., 23.I.1982, MACN-Ar 28169 (ARAMR-000881) and MACN-Ar 28167 (ARAMR-000889), respectively. 1 ♂, same data, MACN-Ar 28168 (ARAMR-000882). Loxosceles rufescens (Dufour): 1 ♀, SPAIN, Granada, Cueva GL-10, Calahonda, M. Ramírez col., 8.XII.1983, UB, Col Aràcnids Reg. Nº 2067 Fl. 83 (ARAMR-000618). 1 ♂, same data (ARAMR-000617). Scytodes globula Nicolet: 2
Recommended publications
  • Comparative Functional Morphology of Attachment Devices in Arachnida
    Comparative functional morphology of attachment devices in Arachnida Vergleichende Funktionsmorphologie der Haftstrukturen bei Spinnentieren (Arthropoda: Arachnida) DISSERTATION zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) an der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel vorgelegt von Jonas Otto Wolff geboren am 20. September 1986 in Bergen auf Rügen Kiel, den 2. Juni 2015 Erster Gutachter: Prof. Stanislav N. Gorb _ Zweiter Gutachter: Dr. Dirk Brandis _ Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 17. Juli 2015 _ Zum Druck genehmigt: 17. Juli 2015 _ gez. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang J. Duschl, Dekan Acknowledgements I owe Prof. Stanislav Gorb a great debt of gratitude. He taught me all skills to get a researcher and gave me all freedom to follow my ideas. I am very thankful for the opportunity to work in an active, fruitful and friendly research environment, with an interdisciplinary team and excellent laboratory equipment. I like to express my gratitude to Esther Appel, Joachim Oesert and Dr. Jan Michels for their kind and enthusiastic support on microscopy techniques. I thank Dr. Thomas Kleinteich and Dr. Jana Willkommen for their guidance on the µCt. For the fruitful discussions and numerous information on physical questions I like to thank Dr. Lars Heepe. I thank Dr. Clemens Schaber for his collaboration and great ideas on how to measure the adhesive forces of the tiny glue droplets of harvestmen. I thank Angela Veenendaal and Bettina Sattler for their kind help on administration issues. Especially I thank my students Ingo Grawe, Fabienne Frost, Marina Wirth and André Karstedt for their commitment and input of ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phylogenetic Distribution of Sphingomyelinase D Activity in Venoms of Haplogyne Spiders
    Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B 135 (2003) 25–33 The phylogenetic distribution of sphingomyelinase D activity in venoms of Haplogyne spiders Greta J. Binford*, Michael A. Wells Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA Received 6 October 2002; received in revised form 8 February 2003; accepted 10 February 2003 Abstract The venoms of Loxosceles spiders cause severe dermonecrotic lesions in human tissues. The venom component sphingomyelinase D (SMD) is a contributor to lesion formation and is unknown elsewhere in the animal kingdom. This study reports comparative analyses of SMD activity and venom composition of select Loxosceles species and representatives of closely related Haplogyne genera. The goal was to identify the phylogenetic group of spiders with SMD and infer the timing of evolutionary origin of this toxin. We also preliminarily characterized variation in molecular masses of venom components in the size range of SMD. SMD activity was detected in all (10) Loxosceles species sampled and two species representing their sister taxon, Sicarius, but not in any other venoms or tissues surveyed. Mass spectrometry analyses indicated that all Loxosceles and Sicarius species surveyed had multiple (at least four to six) molecules in the size range corresponding to known SMD proteins (31–35 kDa), whereas other Haplogynes analyzed had no molecules in this mass range in their venom. This suggests SMD originated in the ancestors of the Loxoscelesy Sicarius lineage. These groups of proteins varied in molecular mass across species with North American Loxosceles having 31–32 kDa, African Loxosceles having 32–33.5 kDa and Sicarius having 32–33 kDa molecules.
    [Show full text]
  • The Placement of the Spider Genus Periegops and the Phylogeny of Scytodoidea (Araneae: Araneomorphae)
    Zootaxa 3312: 1–44 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) The placement of the spider genus Periegops and the phylogeny of Scytodoidea (Araneae: Araneomorphae) FACUNDO M. LABARQUE1 & MARTÍN J. RAMÍREZ1 1Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Av. Ángel Gallardo 470, C1405DJR, Buenos Aires, Argentina. [email protected] / [email protected] Abstract The relationships of Scytodoidea, including the families Drymusidae, Periegopidae, Scytodidae and Sicariidae, have been con- tentious for a long time. Here we present a reviewed phylogenetic analysis of scytodoid spiders, emphasizing Periegops, the only genus in the family Periegopidae. In our analysis the Scytodoidea are united by the fusion of the third abdominal entapo- physes into a median lobe, the presence of female palpal femoral thorns and associated cheliceral stridulatory ridges, a mem- branous lobe on the cheliceral promargin, and the loss of minor ampullate gland spigots. A basal split within Scytodoidea defines two monophyletic groups: Sicariidae and a group formed by Scytodidae as the sister group of Periegopidae plus Dry- musidae, all united by having bipectinate prolateral claws on tarsi I–II, one major ampullate spigot accompanied by a nubbin, and the posterior median spinnerets with a mesal field of spicules. Periegops is the sister group of Drymusidae, united by the regain of promarginal cheliceral teeth and a triangular cheliceral lamina, which is continuous with the paturon margin. Key words: Drymusa, Drymusidae, Haplogyne, morphology, Scytodes, Stedocys, Scytodidae, Sicariidae, Sicarius, Loxosceles Introduction The family Periegopidae currently comprises only the genus Periegops, with two species: the type species Perie- gops suteri (Urquhart) from the Banks Peninsula on the South Island of New Zealand (Vink 2006), and Periegops australia Forster, from southeastern Queensland (Forster 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary List of Fossil Spiders
    A summary list of fossil spiders compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2010. A summary list of fossil spiders. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 10.5. American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last udated: 10.12.2009 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the spider fossil record and numerous new taxa have been described. As part of a larger project to catalog the diversity of fossil arachnids and their relatives, our aim here is to offer a summary list of the known fossil spiders in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Catalog. For this reason some of the family groupings proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. Extinct families have been inserted in the position which we hope best reflects their probable affinities. Genus and species names were compiled from established lists and cross-referenced against the primary literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Niche Modelling of the Chilean Recluse Spider Loxosceles Laeta and Araneophagic Spitting Spider Scytodes Globula and Risk for Loxoscelism in Chile
    Medical and Veterinary Entomology (2016) 30, 383–391 doi: 10.1111/mve.12184 Niche modelling of the Chilean recluse spider Loxosceles laeta and araneophagic spitting spider Scytodes globula and risk for loxoscelism in Chile M. CANALS1, A. TAUCARE-RIOS2, A. D. BRESCOVIT3, F.PEÑA-GOMEZ2,G.BIZAMA2, A. CANALS1,4, L. MORENO5 andR. BUSTAMANTE2 1Departamento de Medicina and Programa de Salud Ambiental, Escuela de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 2Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 3Laboratório Especial de Coleções Zoológicas, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, Brazil, 4Dirección Académica, Clínica Santa Maria, Santiago, Chile and 5Departamento de Zoología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanográficas, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile Abstract. In Chile, all necrotic arachnidism is attributed to the Chilean recluse spider Loxosceles laeta (Nicolet) (Araneae: Sicariidae). It is predated by the spitting spider Scytodes globula (Nicolet) (Araneae: Scytodidae). The biology of each of these species is not well known and it is important to clarify their distributions. The aims of this study are to elucidate the variables involved in the niches of both species based on environmental and human footprint variables, and to construct geographic maps that will be useful in estimating potential distributions and in defining a map of estimated risk for loxoscelism in Chile. Loxosceles laeta was found to be associated with high temperatures and low rates of precipitation, whereas although S. globula was also associated with high temperatures, its distribution was associated with a higher level of precipitation. The main variable associated with the distribution of L.
    [Show full text]
  • Loxosceles Laeta (Nicolet) (Arachnida: Araneae) in Southern Patagonia
    Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina ISSN: 0373-5680 ISSN: 1851-7471 [email protected] Sociedad Entomológica Argentina Argentina The recent expansion of Chilean recluse Loxosceles laeta (Nicolet) (Arachnida: Araneae) in Southern Patagonia Faúndez, Eduardo I.; Alvarez-Muñoz, Claudia X.; Carvajal, Mariom A.; Vargas, Catalina J. The recent expansion of Chilean recluse Loxosceles laeta (Nicolet) (Arachnida: Araneae) in Southern Patagonia Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina, vol. 79, no. 2, 2020 Sociedad Entomológica Argentina, Argentina Available in: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=322062959008 PDF generated from XML JATS4R by Redalyc Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Notas e recent expansion of Chilean recluse Loxosceles laeta (Nicolet) (Arachnida: Araneae) in Southern Patagonia La reciente expansión de Loxosceles laeta (Nicolet) (Arachnida: Araneae) en la Patagonia Austral Eduardo I. Faúndez Laboratorio de entomología, Instituto de la Patagonia, Universidad de Magallanes, Chile Claudia X. Alvarez-Muñoz Unidad de zoonosis, Secretaria Regional Ministerial de Salud de Aysén, Chile Mariom A. Carvajal [email protected] Laboratorio de entomología, Instituto de la Patagonia, Universidad de Magallanes, Chile Catalina J. Vargas Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina, vol. 79, no. 2, 2020 Laboratorio de entomología, Instituto de la Patagonia, Universidad de Sociedad Entomológica Argentina, Magallanes, Chile Argentina Received: 06 February 2020 Accepted: 03 May 2020 Published: 29 June 2020 Abstract: e recent expansion of the Chilean recluse Loxosceles laeta (Nicolet, 1849) Redalyc: https://www.redalyc.org/ in southern Patagonia is commented and discussed in the light of current global change. articulo.oa?id=322062959008 New records are provided from both Región de Aysén and Región de Magallanes.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversidad De Arañas (Arachnida: Araneae) Asociadas Con Viviendas De La Ciudad De México (Zona Metropolitana)
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 80: 55-69, 2009 Diversidad de arañas (Arachnida: Araneae) asociadas con viviendas de la ciudad de México (Zona Metropolitana) Spider diversity (Arachnida: Araneae) associated with houses in México city (Metropolitan area) César Gabriel Durán-Barrón*, Oscar F. Francke y Tila Ma. Pérez-Ortiz Colección Nacional de Arácnidos (CNAN), Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Ciudad Universitaria, Apartado postal 70-153, 04510 México, D. F., México. *Correspondencia: [email protected] Resumen. La ecología urbana es un área de investigación relativamente reciente. Los ecosistemas urbanos son aquellos defi nidos como ambientes dominados por el hombre. Con el proceso de urbanización, insectos y arácnidos silvestres aprovechan los nuevos microhábitats que las viviendas humanas ofrecen. Se revisaron arañas recolectadas dentro de 109 viviendas durante los años de 1985 a 1986, 1996 a 2001 y 2002 a 2003. Se cuantifi caron 1 196 organismos , los cuales se determinaron hasta especie. Se obtuvo una lista de 25 familias, 52 géneros y 63 especies de arañas sinantrópicas. Se utilizaron 3 índices (ocupación, densidad y estacionalidad) y un análisis de intervalos para sustentar la siguiente clasifi cación: accidentales (índice de densidad de 0-0.9), ocasionales (1-2.9), frecuentes (3.0-9.9) y comunes (10 en adelante). Se comparan las faunas de arañas sinantrópicas de 5 países del Nuevo Mundo. Palabras clave: sinantropismo, ecología, urbanización, microhábitats. Abstract. Urban ecology is a relatively new area of research, with urban ecosystems being defi ned as environments dominated by humans. Insects and arachnids are 2 groups that successfully exploit the habitats offered by human habitations.
    [Show full text]
  • Araneae (Spider) Photos
    Araneae (Spider) Photos Araneae (Spiders) About Information on: Spider Photos of Links to WWW Spiders Spiders of North America Relationships Spider Groups Spider Resources -- An Identification Manual About Spiders As in the other arachnid orders, appendage specialization is very important in the evolution of spiders. In spiders the five pairs of appendages of the prosoma (one of the two main body sections) that follow the chelicerae are the pedipalps followed by four pairs of walking legs. The pedipalps are modified to serve as mating organs by mature male spiders. These modifications are often very complicated and differences in their structure are important characteristics used by araneologists in the classification of spiders. Pedipalps in female spiders are structurally much simpler and are used for sensing, manipulating food and sometimes in locomotion. It is relatively easy to tell mature or nearly mature males from female spiders (at least in most groups) by looking at the pedipalps -- in females they look like functional but small legs while in males the ends tend to be enlarged, often greatly so. In young spiders these differences are not evident. There are also appendages on the opisthosoma (the rear body section, the one with no walking legs) the best known being the spinnerets. In the first spiders there were four pairs of spinnerets. Living spiders may have four e.g., (liphistiomorph spiders) or three pairs (e.g., mygalomorph and ecribellate araneomorphs) or three paris of spinnerets and a silk spinning plate called a cribellum (the earliest and many extant araneomorph spiders). Spinnerets' history as appendages is suggested in part by their being projections away from the opisthosoma and the fact that they may retain muscles for movement Much of the success of spiders traces directly to their extensive use of silk and poison.
    [Show full text]
  • SHORT COMMUNICATION Notes on the Amazonian Species of The
    2008. The Journal of Arachnology 36:164–166 SHORT COMMUNICATION Notes on the Amazonian species of the genus Drymusa Simon (Araneae, Drymusidae) Cristina A. Rheims and Antonio D. Brescovit: Laborato´rio de Artro´podes, Instituto Butantan, Avenida Vital Brasil, 1500, 05503-900, Sa˜o Paulo, Sa˜o Paulo, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] Alexandre B. Bonaldo: Coordenac¸a˜o de Zoologia, Museu Paraense Emı´lio Goeldi, Av. Magalha˜es Barata, 376, Caixa Postal 399, 66040-170, Bele´m, Para´, Brazil. Abstract. Males of Drymusa spelunca Bonaldo, Rheims & Brescovit 2006 and D. colligata Bonaldo, Rheims & Brescovit 2006 are described based on additional material collected in their type localities: the FLONA Caraja´s, Caraja´s and Juruti, both in the state of Para´, Brazil. Keywords: Spiders, Amazonia, taxonomy Until recently, the occurrence of the family Drymusidae in Brazil dorsally cream colored with 5–6 transversal brown bands (Fig. 1), was unknown. The first Brazilian species of Drymusa was described ventrally cream colored with irregular brown pattern. Total length by Brescovit et al. (2004) followed by the description of four 3.00. Carapace flattened, 1.35 long, 1.10 wide. Eye diameters: PME additional species by Bonaldo et al. (2006), all occurring in Brazilian 0.03, ALE 0.02, PLE 0.02. Lateral eyes on a tubercle. Chelicerae with Oriental Amazonia. Among these species were D. spelunca and D. two small retromarginal teeth, promarginal carina, and sub-apical colligata described by Bonaldo, Rheims & Brescovit (2006) both hyaline keel. Labium: 0.25 long, 0.25 wide. Sternum: 0.70 long, 0.70 descriptions based on females collected in the state of Para´, at Caraja´s wide.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF (Inglês)
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-992X-2019-0198 ISSN 1678-992X Research Article Soil spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) in native and reforested Araucaria forests Ecology Jamil de Morais Pereira1* , Elke Jurandy Bran Nogueira Cardoso2 , Antonio Domingos Brescovit3 , Luís Carlos Iuñes de Oliveira Filho4 , Julia Corá Segat5 , Carolina Riviera Duarte Maluche Baretta6 , Dilmar Baretta5 1Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Sul ABSTRACT: Spiders are part of the soil biodiversity, considered fundamental to the food de Minas Gerais, Praça Tiradentes, 416 – 37576-000 – chain hierarchy, directly and indirectly influencing several services in agricultural and forest Inconfidentes, MG – Brasil. ecosystems. The present study aimed to evaluate the biodiversity of soil spider families and 2Universidade de São Paulo/ESALQ – Depto. de Ciência do identify which soil properties influence their presence, as well as proposing families as potential Solo, Av. Pádua Dias, 11 – 13418-900 – Piracicaba, SP – bioindicators. Native forest (NF) and reforested sites (RF) with Araucaria angustifolia (Bertol.) Brasil. Kuntze were evaluated in three regions of the state São Paulo, both in the winter and summer. 3Instituto Butantan – Lab. Especial de Coleções Zoológicas, Fifteen soil samples were collected from each forest to evaluate the biological (spiders and Av. Vital Brasil, 1500 – 05503-900 – São Paulo, SP – Brasil. microbiological), chemical and physical soil properties, in addition to properties of the litter 4Universidade Federal de Pelotas/FAEM – Depto. de Solos, (dry matter and C, N and S contents). For soil spiders, two sampling methods were used: pitfall Av. Eliseu Maciel, s/n – 96050-500 – Capão do Leão, RS – traps and soil monoliths.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptation of the Spiders to the Environment: the Case of Some Chilean Species
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Frontiers - Publisher Connector REVIEW published: 11 August 2015 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00220 Adaptation of the spiders to the environment: the case of some Chilean species Mauricio Canals 1*, Claudio Veloso 2 and Rigoberto Solís 3 1 Departamento de Medicina and Programa de Salud Ambiental, Escuela de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 2 Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 3 Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas Animales, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile Spiders are small arthropods that have colonized terrestrial environments. These impose three main problems: (i) terrestrial habitats have large fluctuations in temperature and humidity; (ii) the internal concentration of water is higher than the external environment in spiders, which exposes them continually to water loss; and (iii) their small body size determines a large surface/volume ratio, affecting energy exchange and influencing the life strategy. In this review we focus on body design, energetic, thermal selection, and water balance characteristics of some spider species present in Chile and correlate Edited by: our results with ecological and behavioral information. Preferred temperatures and Tatiana Kawamoto, Independent Researcher, Brazil critical temperatures of Chilean spiders vary among species and individuals and may be Reviewed by: adjusted by phenotypic plasticity. For example in the mygalomorph high-altitude spider Ulrich Theopold, Paraphysa parvula the preferred temperature is similar to that of the lowland spider Stockholm University, Sweden Grammostola rosea; but while P.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Classification of Spiders
    18 FROM: Ubick, D., P. Paquin, P.E. Cushing, andV. Roth (eds). 2005. Spiders of North America: an identification manual. American Arachnological Society. 377 pages. Chapter 2 PHYLOGENY AND CLASSIFICATION OF SPIDERS Jonathan A. Coddington ARACHNIDA eyes, jumping spiders also share many other anatomical, Spiders are one of the eleven orders of the class Arach- behavioral, ecological, and physiological features. Most nida, which also includes groups such as harvestmen (Opil- important for the field arachnologist they all jump, a useful iones), ticks and mites (Acari), scorpions (Scorpiones), false bit of knowledge if you are trying to catch one. Taxonomic scorpions (Pseudoscorpiones), windscorpions (Solifugae), prediction works in reverse as well: that spider bouncing and vinegaroons (Uropygi). All arachnid orders occur in about erratically in the bushes is almost surely a salticid. North America. Arachnida today comprises approximately Another reason that scientists choose to base classifica- 640 families, 9000 genera, and 93,000 described species, but tion on phylogeny is that evolutionary history (like all his- the current estimate is that untold hundreds of thousands tory) is unique: strictly speaking, it only happened once. of new mites, substantially fewer spiders, and several thou- That means there is only one true reconstruction of evolu- sand species in the remaining orders, are still undescribed tionary history and one true phylogeny: the existing clas- (Adis & Harvey 2000, reviewed in Coddington & Colwell sification is either correct, or it is not. In practice it can be 2001, Coddington et ol. 2004). Acari (ticks and mites) are complicated to reconstruct the true phylogeny of spiders by far the most diverse, Araneae (spiders) second, and the and to know whether any given reconstruction (or classifi- remaining taxa orders of magnitude less diverse.
    [Show full text]