Contribution of Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria and Archaea to Nitrification in Estuarine Sediments Along a Eutrophic Gradient

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Contribution of Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria and Archaea to Nitrification in Estuarine Sediments Along a Eutrophic Gradient Contribution of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea to nitrification in estuarine sediments along a eutrophic gradient Emily Stone Clark University Advisors: Julie Huber and Anne Giblin Abstract Eutrophication, the enrichment of ammonium and phosphate, is a major concern for coastal aquatic systems such as estuaries. Eutrophication may hinder the coupling of nitrification-denitrification in sediment, which is responsible for removing large amounts of nitrogen in aquatic ecosystems. The first and rate-limiting step in nitrification is catalyzed by the enzyme ammonia monooxygenase (amo) and is performed by two distinct groups of microorganisms: ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and ammonia-oxidizing archaea. Presence of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea was determined by amplifying the amoA gene. Sediment slurries were used to measure potential nitrification rates from estuarine sediments taken along a eutrophic gradient. Results showed lower potential nitrification rates at more eutrophic sites and higher nitrification rates at less eutrophic sites. Similarly, the relative abundance of ammonia oxidizing archaea was lowest at the most eutrophic site and highest at the least eutrophic site. The bacterial inhibitor, 1-octyne, which has been shown to inhibit ammonia oxidizing bacterial activity in soils, did not inhibit these bacteria in sediment. Although ammonia-oxidizing bacteria were detected in sediments, the relative abundance was not determined. However, results suggest that ammonia-oxidizing archaea are more abundant in estuarine sediments than ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Trends indicate that the relative abundance of ammonia-oxidizing archaea increases as eutrophication decreases but no trends were detected for ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Key words: eutrophication, nitrification rates, ammonia oxidizing bacteria, ammonia oxidizing archaea Introduction Anthropogenic inputs on ecosystems influence the nitrogen cycle and have resulted in many environmental problems including loss of biodiversity, global water acidification, increased levels of the potent greenhouse gas, nitrous oxide, and eutrophication (Gruber and Galloway 2008). Coastal regions receive much of the nitrogen-rich runoff from municipal and industrial wastewaters as well as urban and agricultural fertilizers. These regions are also susceptible to nutrient enrichment. Nutrient enrichment is mainly in the form of ammonium and leads to eutrophication in the water. Eutrophication, in particular, is a serious concern for estuaries. More than half of the estuaries in the US experience some type of effect from it (Meyer-Reil and Köster 2000). However, nitrogen levels in estuaries can typically be reduced through tightly coupled microbial processes in the nitrogen cycle. Nitrification converts ammonium to nitrite and then nitrate, which then can be converted to dinitrogen gas by denitrification or anammox. These microbially-mediated processes thus determine recycling and removal of dissolved inorganic nitrogen from aquatic systems. Denitrification in marine sediments is dependent on the supply of nitrate and is driven almost exclusively from sediment nitrification (Jensen et al. 1993). Coupling of nitrification-denitrification removes up to 50% of external dissolved inorganic nitrogen from ammonium inputs to estuaries (Seitzinger et al. 2006). Nitrate production requires oxygen, thus nitrification is restricted to aerobic environments (Ward et al. 2011). Because both ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea require oxygen in order to nitrify, these microorganisms may be affected by the environmental changes brought about from nutrient loading by eutrophication such as reduced oxygen concentration in sediments. Thus, eutrophication may limit aerobic regions for nitrification, and thereby, may decrease nitrate production and removal of inorganic nitrogen in aquatic environments. The first and rate-limiting step in nitrification is ammonia oxidation catalyzed by the ammonia monooxygenase (amo) gene (Beman et al. 2007). Nitrification was long thought to be solely carried out by ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in soils and sediments (Bernhard et al. 2010). However, recent studies have shown that archaea from the phylum Thaumarchaeota can also oxidize ammonium and are present in various soils and sediments (Taylor, et al. 2013). Molecular studies have identified genes putatively encoding archaeal ammonia monooxygenase subunits (amoA, amoB, and amoC). The amoA subunit is homologous to the amoA gene found in ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (Mosier and Francis 2008). Thaumarchaeota carrying the archaeal amoA gene appear to be ubiquitous and have been detected in coastal and marine waters, cold sediments, subsurface of radioactive thermosprings, microbial mats, coral reefs, as well as, terrestrial forest soils and grasslands (Erguder, Boon et al. 2009). Several studies have found that ammonia-oxidizing archaeal amoA gene copy numbers are more abundant than the bacterial amoA gene in soil, estuaries, and open waters (Mosier and Francis 2008). Beman et al. (2008) determined that ammonia-oxidizing archaea dominated ammonia-oxidizing bacteria by a factor of 37-217 in surface waters from the Gulf of California while Caffrey et al. (2007) found an abundance ratio of archaeal to bacterial amoA gene around 80 in estuarine sediments. Although the archaeal amoA gene has been found in higher abundance than the bacterial amoA gene, the relative contributions of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea to nitrification are still not fully understood. Recent studies suggest that selectively blocking ammonium oxidation by ammonia oxidizing bacteria may help estimate ammonia-oxidizing archaea nitrification rates. This, in return, may aid in determining the relative contribution of both ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea to nitrification in soils and sediments. For example, Taylor et al. (2013) found that 1- octyne inhibited a range of ammonia-oxidizing bacterial activity in soils by inactivating the amo enzyme. It had no effect on ammonia-oxidizing archaeal activity in the soil. They also found that 1-octyne inhibited the bacterial activity in less than 48 hours. With its relative efficiency, this inhibitor may also help differentiate potential nitrification rates attributable to either ammonia- oxidizing bacteria or archaea in estuarine sediments. Using a combination of potential nitrification rate measurements and PCR-based methods, this paper investigates i) the effects of eutrophication in estuarine sediments around Falmouth, Massachusetts on nitrification rates and ii) the relative contribution of ammonia- oxidizing bacteria and archaea to nitrification in eutrophic sediments. Methods Sampling Sites Four inch diameter sediment cores were taken in duplicates from four estuaries located around Falmouth, Massachusetts in early November 2015. Sediment taken from Little Pond and Eel pond did not show a clear separation of aerobic and anaerobic regions. Sediment cores collected from these locations were near black and viscous indicating more anaerobic conditions and higher eutrophication. However, sediment collected from Quissett Harbor and Waquoit Bay was less viscous and had more distinction between the aerobic and anaerobic regions indicating less eutrophic sediments. Additionally, amphipod tubes were present in sediment taken from Waquoit Bay, which indicates well-oxygenated sediment. To determine level of eutrophication in sediment, subsamples of sediment from cores from each of the four sites were burned at 500ºC in a muffle furnace (Thermo Scientific™ Thermolyne™ Industrial Benchtop Muffle Furnaces). Percent organic matter within sediments was calculated by subtracting original weight of sediment from post-burned sediment. The four sites were then organized along a eutrophic gradient based on percent organic matter in sediment subsamples with higher percent organic matter reflected more eutrophic sediment and lower percent organic matter reflected less eutrophic sediment. Potential Nitrification Rates Potential rates of nitrification in sediments were measured using a shaken sediment-slurry method with added nutrient solution (Bernhard et al. 2007). Two treatments were analyzed to look at total nitrification and archaeal nitrification: (i) environmental control and (ii) with addition of the bacterial inhibitor, 1-octyne (10 uM). Octyne was used as in inhibitor to block ammonia-oxidizing bacteria activity while allowing ammonia-oxidizing archaea activity to continue (Taylor et al. 2013). Cores were sectioned off to isolate the aerobic region of the sediment by removing the top 2 centimeters of sediment. Approximately one gram of wet weight of sediment from each site was added to 50 mL falcon tubes for destructive sampling at time points 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours, and several blanks in duplicates. Archaeal nitrification from Little Pond and Waquoit Bay had additional time points at 120 hours and 168 hours for a total 7 day incubation period to determine if the archaeal population would rapidly increase without bacterial ammonia oxidizers. Subsamples from cores of each site were weighed, dried at 60ºC for two days and re-weighed to obtain wet/dry conversion factors. Seawater was collected from each site and filtered through GF/F filters and re-filtered again with 0.20 nanometer pore sized membrane filters to remove microorganisms. A nutrient solution (300 µM 3 NH4, 60 µM PO4 ) was created with filtered seawater from each location and 30 mL was added to each tube to create a
Recommended publications
  • Municipal Wastewater Denitrification Evaluation City of Windom, Minnesota
    Municipal Wastewater Denitrification Evaluation City of Windom, Minnesota July 29, 2016 – Revised November 4, 2016 Bolton & Menk, Inc. Project No. T22.109023 Prepared by: Submitted by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. 12224 Nicollet Blvd Burnsvillle, MN 55337 P: 952-890-0509 F: 952-890-8065 wq-wwtp5-91 MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER DENITRIFICATION EVALUATION CITY OF WINDOM, MINNESOTA JULY 2016 BMI Project No. T22.109023 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature: Typed or Printed Name: Lana Tullis, P.E. Date: July 29, 2016 Lic. No. 41450 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature: Typed or Printed Name: Herman Dharmarajah, Ph.D., P.E. Date: July 29, 2016 Lic. No. 18256 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. BOLTON & MENK, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1-1 A. Project Background ........................................................................................ 1-1 B. Nitrate Standards
    [Show full text]
  • Human Alteration of the Global Nitrogen Cycle
    What is Nitrogen? Human Alteration of the Nitrogen is the most abundant element in Global Nitrogen Cycle the Earth’s atmosphere. Nitrogen makes up 78% of the troposphere. Nitrogen cannot be absorbed directly by the plants and animals until it is converted into compounds they can use. This process is called the Nitrogen Cycle. Heather McGraw, Mandy Williams, Suzanne Heinzel, and Cristen Whorl, Give SIUE Permission to Put Our Presentation on E-reserve at Lovejoy Library. The Nitrogen Cycle How does the nitrogen cycle work? Step 1- Nitrogen Fixation- Special bacteria convert the nitrogen gas (N2 ) to ammonia (NH3) which the plants can use. Step 2- Nitrification- Nitrification is the process which converts the ammonia into nitrite ions which the plants can take in as nutrients. Step 3- Ammonification- After all of the living organisms have used the nitrogen, decomposer bacteria convert the nitrogen-rich waste compounds into simpler ones. Step 4- Denitrification- Denitrification is the final step in which other bacteria convert the simple nitrogen compounds back into nitrogen gas (N2 ), which is then released back into the atmosphere to begin the cycle again. How does human intervention affect the nitrogen cycle? Nitric Oxide (NO) is released into the atmosphere when any type of fuel is burned. This includes byproducts of internal combustion engines. Production and Use of Nitrous Oxide (N2O) is released into the atmosphere through Nitrogen Fertilizers bacteria in livestock waste and commercial fertilizers applied to the soil. Removing nitrogen from the Earth’s crust and soil when we mine nitrogen-rich mineral deposits. Discharge of municipal sewage adds nitrogen compounds to aquatic ecosystems which disrupts the ecosystem and kills fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Nitrogen Removal Training Program
    Nitrogen Removal Training Program Module 1 Nitrogen in the Aquatic Environment • Forms of Nitrogen and Nitrogen Transformations • Nitrogen in Surface Waters • Water Quality Impacts of Nitrogen Discharges • Nitrogen in Wastewater Module 1 Transparency 1 Nitrogen Removal Training Program Module 1 Forms of Nitrogen and Nitrogen Transformations Module 1 Transparency 2 Forms of Nitrogen in the Environment Unoxidized Forms Oxidized Forms of Nitrogen of Nitrogen Nitrite (NO -) • Nitrogen Gas (N2) • 2 + Nitrate (NO -) • Ammonia (NH4 , NH3) • 3 • Organic Nitrogen (urea, • Nitrous Oxide (N2O) amino acids, peptides, proteins, etc...) • Nitric Oxide (NO) • Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Module 1 Transparency 3 Nitrogen Fixation • Biological Fixation - Use of atmospheric nitrogen by certain photosynthetic blue-green algae and bacteria for growth. Nitrogen Gas Organic Nitrogen (N2) • Lightning Fixation - Conversion of atmospheric nitrogen to nitrate by lightning. lightning Nitrogen Gas + Ozone Nitrate - (N2) (O3)(NO3 ) • Industrial Fixation - Conversion of nitrogen gas to ammonia and nitrate-nitrogen (used in the manufacture of fertilizers and explosives). Module 1 Transparency 4 Biological Nitrogen Fixation Nitrogen Gas (N2) Bacteria Blue-green Algae Organic N Organic N Certain blue-green algae and bacteria use atmospheric nitrogen to produce organic nitrogen compounds. Module 1 Transparency 5 Atmospheric Fixation Lightning converts Nitrogen Gas and Ozone to Nitrate. Nitrogen Gas Nitrate Module 1 Transparency 6 Industrial Fixation N2 Nitrogen gas is converted to ammonia and nitrate in the production of fertilizer and explosives. NH3 - NO3 Module 1 Transparency 7 Ammonification and Assimilation Ammonification - Conversion of organic nitrogen to ammonia-nitrogen resulting from the biological decomposition of dead plant and animal tissue and animal fecal matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.DENITRIFICATION of WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EFFLUENT USING ANAEROBIC BACTERIAL BED REACTOR IMMERSED: OPERATING PERFO
    Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering E-ISSN: 1982-3932 [email protected] Universidade Federal da Paraíba Brasil Sylla, Aboubacar; Fatima Ezzahra, Aboussabiq; Najwa, Hassou; Rihani, Mohamed; Jamal, Amine; Omar, Assobhei; Samira, Etahiri DENITRIFICATION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EFFLUENT USING ANAEROBIC BACTERIAL BED REACTOR IMMERSED: OPERATING PERFORMANCE Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering, vol. 11, núm. 2, julio-diciembre, 2017, pp. 208-218 Universidade Federal da Paraíba Paraíba, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=283255970009 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Journal of Urban and Environmental Journal of Urban and E Engineering, v.11, n.2, p.208-218 Environmental Engineering ISSN 1982-3932 J www.journal-uee.org E doi: 10.4090/juee.2017.v11n2.208218 U DENITRIFICATION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EFFLUENT USING ANAEROBIC BACTERIAL BED REACTOR IMMERSED: OPERATING PERFORMANCE Aboubacar Sylla*, Aboussabiq Fatima Ezzahra, Hassou Najwa, Mohamed Rihani, Amine Jamal, Assobhei Omar and Etahiri Samira BIOMARE Laboratory, Biology Department, Faculty of Science, University Chouaib Doukkali, P.O. Box 20, El Jadida 2400, Morocco. Received 27 August 2016; received in revised form 02 May 2017; accepted 05 July 2017 Abstract: In this study, a heterotrophic denitrification was designed for domestic wastewater treatment with unexpected water flows at different loading rates. Benefited from excellent removal ability COD, shorten operating time and lower maintenance cost. During the time of operation (six months), injection of nitrate was made in the influent RALBI 1 while the RALBI 2 was fed with sewage without addition of nitrate.
    [Show full text]
  • Nitrogen Transformations in Wetlands: Effects of Water Flow Patterns
    S£ 9807//6 Nitrogen transformations in wetlands: Effects of water flow patterns Department of Ecology Limnology Lund University, Sweden Lund 1997 DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. Organization Document name LUND UNIVERSITY DOCTORAL DISSERTATION Department ofEcology Limnology Date of Issue November 14. 1997 S-223 62 Lund Sweden SE-LUNBDS/NBLL-97/1032-t-l 14pp Authors) Sponsoring organization Torbjorn Davidsson Title and subtitle Nitrogen transformations in wetlands: Effects of water Bow patterns Abstract In this thesis, 1 have studied nitrogen turnover processes in watermcadows. A watcrmcadow is a wetland where water infiltrates through the soil of a grassland field. It is hypothesized that infiltration of water through the soil matrix promotes nutrient transformations compared to surface flow of water, by increasing the contact between water, nutrients, soil organic matter and bacteria. 1 have studied how the balance between nitrogen removal (denitrification, assimilative uptake, adsorption) and release (mineralization, desorption) processes arc affected by water How characteristics. Mass balance studies and direct denitrification measurements at two field sites showed that, although denitrification was high, net nitrogen removal in the watermcadows was poor. This was dueto release of ammonium and dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) from the soils. In laboratory studies, using ,5 N isotope techniques, I have shown that nitrogen turnover is considerably affected by hydrological conditions and by soil type. Infiltration increased virtually all the nitrogen processes, due to deeper penetration of nitrate and oxygen, and extended zones of turnover processes. On the contrary, soils and sediments with surface waterflow, diffusion is the main transfer mechanism.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Phosphorus on Nitrification Process in a Fertile Soil Amended
    agriculture Article Effects of Phosphorus on Nitrification Process in a Fertile Soil Amended with Urea Jianfeng Ning 1,2,*, Yuji Arai 2 , Jian Shen 1, Ronghui Wang 1 and Shaoying Ai 1,* 1 Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer in South Region, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nutrient Cycling and Farmland Conservation, Guangzhou 510640, China; [email protected] (J.S.); [email protected] (R.W.) 2 Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (J.N.); [email protected] (S.A.) Abstract: While the effects of carbon on soil nitrogen (N) cycle have been extensively studied, it is not clearly understood how co-existing macronutrients, such as phosphorus (P), affect the N cycle in agroecosystems. In this study, P amendment effects on nitrification in a fertile agricultural soil were investigated under a typical N-P amendment rate. In a laboratory incubation study, soils were amended with urea, monopotassium phosphate and a mixture of urea and monopotassium phosphate at the same rate. In soils that received no amendments (control), P only, urea only, and urea plus P amendment, nitrification occurred within the first five days, with an average net nitrification rate of 5.30, 5.77, 16.66 and 9.00 mg N kg−1d−1, respectively. Interestingly, nitrification in urea-treated soils was retarded by P addition where a N:P ratio seemed to be a key factor impeding nitrification.
    [Show full text]
  • Minimization of N2O Emission Through Intermittent Aeration in a Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR): Main Behavior and Mechanism
    water Article Minimization of N2O Emission through Intermittent Aeration in a Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR): Main Behavior and Mechanism Tang Liu 1, Shufeng Liu 1,*, Shishi He 2, Zhichao Tian 2 and Maosheng Zheng 2 1 College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Key Laboratory of Water and Sediment Sciences, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100871, China; [email protected] 2 College of Environmental Science and Technology, North China Electric Power University, Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Systems Optimization, Ministry of Education, Beijing 102206, China; [email protected] (S.H.); [email protected] (Z.T.); [email protected] (M.Z.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-10-62754292 Abstract: To explore the main behavior and mechanism of minimizing nitrous oxide (N2O) emission through intermittent aeration during wastewater treatment, two lab-scale sequencing batch reac- tors operated at intermittently aerated mode (SBR1), and continuously aerated mode (SBR2) were established. Compared with SBR2, the intermittently aerated SBR1 reached not only a higher total nitrogen removal efficiency (averaged 93.5%) but also a lower N2O-emission factor (0.01–0.53% of influent ammonia), in which short-cut nitrification and denitrification were promoted. Moreover, less accumulation and consumption of polyhydroxyalkanoates, a potential endogenous carbon source promoting N2O emission, were observed in SBR1. Batch experiments revealed that nitrifier denitrifi- cation was the major pathway generating N2O while heterotrophic denitrification played as a sink of N2O, and SBR1 embraced a larger N2O-mitigating capability. Finally, quantitative polymerase chain reaction results suggested that the abundant complete ammonia oxidizer (comammox) ele- vated in the intermittently aerated environment played a potential role in avoiding N2O generation during wastewater treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • External Carbon Sources for Nitrogen Removal
    United States Environmental Protection Agency August 2013 Wastewater Treatment Fact Sheet: External Carbon Sources for Nitrogen Removal DESCRIPTION Discharge permits for publicly owned treatment There are two major sources of organic carbon works (POTWs) and industries often include utilized in wastewater treatment operations. effluent limits for nutrients, including nitrogen. The sources are defined with respect to Total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) for whether they originate within the influent nutrients have and are being developed for many wastewater entering the treatment facility or water bodies throughout the United States. The are provided as an external supplemental TMDLs and resultant waste load allocations to carbon source added to the treatment system. protect impaired water bodies have resulted in Carbon sources are termed external when the more stringent effluent limits for total nitrogen. carbon substrate is sourced from outside the wastewater treatment process i.e., it is not In order to achieve very low total nitrogen limits derived from the influent wastewater or any of less than 6 mg/l through biological onsite treatment processes at the treatment denitrification, a readily biodegradable carbon facility. External supplemental carbon sources source must be available for the denitrifying are brought into the wastewater treatment organisms to use. A supplemental external process usually as pure compounds or high carbon source is often required when organic strength waste materials where concentrations material in the wastewater has been oxidized. can be as high as 1.5 g/L chemical oxygen This is especially true in denitrification processes demand (COD) to facilitate nutrient removal. that are located after the aeration process such Internal carbon sources refer to organic as post or second anoxic zone and denitrifying carbon substrates obtained either within filters.
    [Show full text]
  • Denitrification: from Genes to Ecosystems
    Denitrification: From Genes to Ecosystems Christopher M. Jones Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences Department of Microbiology Uppsala Doctoral Thesis Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala 2010 Acta Universitatis agriculturae Sueciae 2010:83 Cover: Montage showing the phylogeny of globally distributed nirS sequences, where tip labels indicate habitat type (see Figure 6, this thesis). Earth photo courtesy of NASA. ISSN 1652-6880 ISBN 978-91-576-7528-6 © 2010 Christopher M. Jones, Uppsala Print: SLU Service/Repro, Uppsala 2010 Denitrification: From Genes to Ecosystems Abstract Denitrification is a part of the global nitrogen cycle in which fixed nitrogen in the biosphere is returned to the atmosphere, and is mediated by diverse communities of microorganisms. This thesis seeks to gain a greater understanding of the ecology of denitrifying microorganisms by examining the pathway from four different aspects; gene, population, community, and ecosystem. A combination of bioinformatic analysis of denitrification genes in pure cultures and environmental samples as well as experimental work with denitrifying bacterial cultures and soil microcosms was performed to understand the relationship between genes and ecosystems in denitrification. Analysis of the phylogeny of genes involved in key steps in the denitrificaiton pathway revealed a different evolutionary pattern for each gene, as processes such as horizontal gene transfer, duplication/divergence, and lineage sorting have contributed differentially to the evolution of catalytic genes at each step. However, genetic variation is not easily translated into an extended phenotype for a population of denitrifiers, as the denitrification phenotype of a set of closely related denitrifying Bacillus soil isolates was variable depending on pH.
    [Show full text]
  • Nitrification 31
    NITROGEN IN SOILS/Nitrification 31 See also: Eutrophication; Greenhouse Gas Emis- Powlson DS (1993) Understanding the soil nitrogen cycle. sions; Isotopes in Soil and Plant Investigations; Soil Use and Management 9: 86–94. Nitrogen in Soils: Cycle; Nitrification; Plant Uptake; Powlson DS (1999) Fate of nitrogen from manufactured Symbiotic Fixation; Pollution: Groundwater fertilizers in agriculture. In: Wilson WS, Ball AS, and Hinton RH (eds) Managing Risks of Nitrates to Humans Further Reading and the Environment, pp. 42–57. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry. Addiscott TM, Whitmore AP, and Powlson DS (1991) Powlson DS (1997) Integrating agricultural nutrient man- Farming, Fertilizers and the Nitrate Problem. Wallingford: agement with environmental objectives – current state CAB International. and future prospects. Proceedings No. 402. York: The Benjamin N (2000) Nitrates in the human diet – good or Fertiliser Society. bad? Annales de Zootechnologie 49: 207–216. Powlson DS, Hart PBS, Poulton PR, Johnston AE, and Catt JA et al. (1998) Strategies to decrease nitrate leaching Jenkinson DS (1986) Recovery of 15N-labelled fertilizer in the Brimstone Farm experiment, Oxfordshire, UK, applied in autumn to winter wheat at four sites in eastern 1988–1993: the effects of winter cover crops and England. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge unfertilized grass leys. Plant and Soil 203: 57–69. 107: 611–620. Cheney K (1990) Effect of nitrogen fertilizer rate on soil Recous S, Fresnau C, Faurie G, and Mary B (1988) The fate nitrate nitrogen content after harvesting winter wheat. of labelled 15N urea and ammonium nitrate applied to a Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 114: winter wheat crop.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nitrogen Cycle
    The Nitrogen Cycle Almost 80% of our atmosphere is made up of the element nitrogen bonded together as N2. This represents most of the nitrogen available on Earth. Ni- trogen is an important element used by all living things to make proteins, amino acids and the nucleic acids of DNA. Yet its gaseous form, N2, found – + in the atmosphere is not usable. It must be “fixed” into nitrates (NO3 ), ammonium (NH4 ) or urea (NH2)2CO to be taken up by plants. Animals can get their nitrogen by eating those plants and so it moves through the food webs. When nitrogen is fixed, it is absorbed by plants and then eaten by animals, who then expel it in their waste and eventually die and decompose (releas- ing more). The nitrogen is then released into the soil and then back into atmosphere – this is the Nitrogen Cycle. The Nitrogen Cycle can be broken down into 4 processes: Nitrogen fixing – Decay – Nitrification – Dentrification 1. Nitrogen Fixing is when gaseous nitrogen is “fixed” by either lightning (only up to about 8%), bacteria in the soil, or nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the root nodules of leguminous plants (like soy beans). 2. Decay - The nitrogen in plants is eaten by animals and broken down and expelled in the animals’ waste. Microorganisms further break it down into ammonia. 3. Nitrification - Some ammonia is absorbed by plants through their roots, but most is converted by nitrifying bacteria into nitrites and then nitrates. 4. Dentrification moves the nitrogen in the other direction back into the atmosphere. Dentrifying bacteria reduce nitrites and nitrates into nitrogen gas, releasing it back to the atmosphere to complete the cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Denitrification, Nutrient Regeneration and Carbon Mineralization in Sediments of Galveston Bay, Texas, USA
    I MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 114: 275-288,1994 Published November l7 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. Denitrification, nutrient regeneration and carbon mineralization in sediments of Galveston Bay, Texas, USA Andrew R. Zimmerman*, Ronald Benner ** Marine Science Institute. University of Texas at Austin, Port Aransas. Texas 78373, USA ABSTRACT: Rates of benthic denitrification, oxygen consumption and nutrient regeneration were measured during winter, spring and summer in Galveston Bay (Texas, USA) sediments. Denitrification ranged from 0 to 47 pm01 N2 m-2 h-' with maximal rates generally occurring in the summer and the upper estuary. Oxygen consumption rates ranged from 38 pm01 O2 m-2 h-' in the winter to 353 pm01 O2 m-' h-' in the summer and were correlated with denitrification rates. Variations in bay water tem- perature accounted for 52 % of the variability associated with denitrification rates whereas only 28% of the variability could be attributed to organic carbon content and 15% to salinity, indicating a pre- dominance of temporal over spatial factors in controlling estuarine rates of denitrification. In the spring and summer, denitrification was responsible for the majority (73 and 80%, respectively) of the total benthic inorganic nitrogen efflux while in the winter, nitrogen fluxes were dominated (80 %) by ammo- nium. At salinities less than 6L, cation exchange interactions may have played an important role in retaining ammonium in the sediment, producing the higher rates of denitrification found in the upper estuary. Dissolved inorganic carbon flux was used as a measure of total organic carbon mineralization. The average molar C:N of the remineralized substrate (5.2) was lower than the average C:N of the sediments (12.6) indicating preferent~alremineralization of nitrogen relative to carbon.
    [Show full text]