DOCSLIB.ORG

Are Bicycle Sharing Schemes Socially Inclusive?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Are Bicycle Sharing Schemes Socially Inclusive? Are bicycle sharing schemes socially inclusive? Dr. Angela Curl, University of Canterbury [email protected] @acurlywurly Dr. Julie Clark, University of West of Scotland with thanks to Rob Henderson Bicycle sharing is great…… … but WHY? • Mode shift and lower levels of car ownership & use (Shaheen et al, 2012) • Environmental benefits • Health benefits • Advertising, data mining, city marketing “one of the most inequitable forms of sustainable transportation infrastructures” (Hoffmann, 2016) Transport and social inclusion • (lack of) transport is a barrier to accessing activities and can be associated with social exclusion (SEU, 2003) • Disadvantage experienced by those unable to fulfil mobility needs (Hine and Mitchell, 2003; Lucas, 2004) • Perpetuated by car-centric society • Polarisation of those with / without car Bike share: a solution? • Shared transport options have the potential to support social inclusion by improving accessibility • Remove barriers to ownership • Support multi-modal journeys – e.g ‘last mile’ to rail or bus (especially in less dense suburban areas) • Normalising cycling • BIKEPLUS and SUSTRANS (UK) have noted potential of cycling and bike share to promote social inclusion and address transport poverty Are bike share schemes targeted appropriately? • Who benefits? • Environmental and health focus could lead to inequality • Significant socio-economic and spatial variations in usage (Pucher et al, 2011) - young, white, male, mid-high income (Buck et al, 2013; Ogilvie and Goodman, 2012; Rietveld and Daniel, 2004) Proposed evaluation framework • Cost and payment • Safety and security • Information • Physical access • Travel horizons • Journey time Objectives can be unclear and little precedent for evaluation (Médard de • Provision of services Chardon et al, 2017; Ricci, 2015) Nextbike Glasgow 10% of households (9% of population) in walking distance (400m) of a docking station (in 2015, based on 2011 census data. 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% PT 29 45 65 15 car - - - - Male other no car no owned Female Age 65+Age Age 0 Age Employed Age 16Age 30Age 45Age private rentprivate white British Unemployed social rentedsocial Qualifications at least least at carone non white non British No QualificationsNo Sex Age Ethnicity Tenure qualification employment mode of travel to hh car status work ownership Bike Glasgow share Mean age 34 38 Mean cars per 0.25 0.31 person Mean cars per 0.49 0.64 household Results summary • Some demographic groups have higher level of proximity to bike docks: • Those aged 16-19 • Non-white/british (usage?) • Private renters • Those without a car slightly more likely to live near a bike dock • Higher rates of proximity among educated and those in employment • Those who live near bike stations less likely to drive to work and more likely to walk or cycle Summary: Glasgow • Locations make sense from commercial and uptake perspective • Potential for environmental, health and social impacts • Proximity ≠ Access ≠ Usage Nextbike Christchurch Who are the users of Christchurch Bike Share? • Survey of users undertaken in June 2017 • 344 responses • 15% response rate • 57% from Canterbury 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 80% 0% Female Male 70% Bikeshare Census 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Female Male Bikeshare Census Cycle to work (2013 census) *survey response bias 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 35% Under 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 30% 17 25% Bikeshare Census 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Under 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 17 Bikeshare Census Cycle to work (2013 census) 60% 70% 50% 60% 50% 40% 40% 30% 30% 20% 20% 10% 10% 0% 0% Under $20,000 $20-$39,000 $40-$100,000 $100,000+ Full time Part time Other Bikeshare Census employed 50% Bikeshare Census 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% No qualification High school Certificate/diploma Bachelor degree Masters degree or higher Bikeshare Census Summary: Christchurch • Bikeshare users are more likely to be female compared with cyclists generally • Younger (under 17) and older (over 65) populations under represented among users • Bike share users are more likely to be employed, educated and earning higher incomes than general populations In conclusion: are bicycle sharing schemes socially inclusive? • They can (and should) meet social objectives • Need to be outcomes focussed • Need to consider policy structures, governance and regulation • Quasi public transport? • “Christchurch has begun to explore how a bikeshare system can meet its strategic transport objectives, support regeneration, and provide viable choices to residents and visitors” – Nick Lovett – tomorrow – 8:30am (Places for people 5) • Bike share is great – but can be even better! Thanks and questions? Clark, J and Curl, A (2016) Bicycle and Car Share Schemes as Inclusive Modes of Travel? A socio-spatial analysis in Glasgow, UK. Social Inclusion 4(3):83-99 (open access) [email protected] @acurlywurly References • Shaheen, S. A., Martin, E. W., Cohen, A. P., & Finson, R. S. (2012). Public bike sharing in North America: Early operator and user understanding|research report. San José, California, USA: Mineta Transportation Institute. Retrieved from http://transweb.sjsu.edu/project/1029.html • Hoffmann, L (2016) Bike Lanes are White Lanes: Bicycle advocacy and Urban Planning. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln & London (2016) • Social Exclusion Unit. (2003). Making the connections: Final report on transport and social exclusion. London, UK: Social Exclusion Unit • Hine, J., & Mitchell, F. (2001). The role of transport on social exclusion in urban Scotland: Literature review. Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Executive Central Research Unit. Retrieved from http://www.gov.scot/Resource/Doc/156591/0042062.pdf • Lucas, K. (2004). Locating transport as a social policy problem. In K. Lucas (Ed.), Running on empty: Transport, social exclusion and environmental justice (pp. • Buck, D., Buehler, R., Happ, P., Rawls, B., Chung, P., & Borecki, N. (2013). Are bikeshare users different from regular cyclists? a first look at short-term users, annual members, and area cyclists in the Washington D.C. region. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2387, 112-119. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/6076965/Are_Bikeshare_Users_Different_from_Regular_Cyclists_A_First_Look_at_Short- Term_Users_Annual_Members_and_Area_Cyclists_in_the_Washington_D.C._Region • Ogilvie, F., & Goodman, A. (2012). Inequalities in usage of a public bicycle sharing scheme: Socio-demographic predictors of uptake and usage of the London (UK) cycle hire scheme. Preventive Medicine, 55(1), 40-45. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.05.002 • Rietveld, P., & Daniel, V. (2004). Determinants of bicycle use: Do municipal policies matter? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 38(7), 531-550. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2004.05.003 • Pucher, J., Buehler, R., & Seinen, M. (2011). Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(6), 451-475. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.03.001 • Médard de Chardon, C., Caruso, G., & Thomas, I. (2017). Bicycle sharing system “success” determinants. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 100, 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2017.04.020 • Ricci, M. (2015). Bike sharing: A review of evidence on impacts and processes of implementation and operation. Research in Transportation and Business Management, 15, 28-38..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analyzing the Effects of Car Sharing Services on the Reduction of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions
    sustainability Article Analyzing the Effects of Car Sharing Services on the Reduction of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Jiyeon Jung 1 and Yoonmo Koo 1,2,* 1 Technology Management, Economics and Policy Program, College of Engineering, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Korea; [email protected] 2 Graduate School of Engineering Practice, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-2-880-2269 Received: 7 February 2018; Accepted: 9 February 2018; Published: 17 February 2018 Abstract: This study examines the environmental impacts of roundtrip car sharing services by investigating transportation behavior. Car sharing should contribute to reduced greenhouse gas GHG emissions; however, such schemes include both positive and negative environmental effects, including: (1) reduced CO2e (carbon dioxide equivalent) from substituting private vehicle use for more fuel-efficient car sharing vehicles, (2) increased CO2e as car-less individuals switch from public transit to car sharing vehicles and (3) reduced CO2e due to fewer vehicles. This study examines the impacts of this modal shift on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions using three types of models: a mixed logit model to analyze car sharing service preferences; a binary logit model to analyze whether individuals are willing to forgo vehicle ownership or planned purchases to use car sharing services; and a linear regression to determine how much private vehicle or public transportation use would be replaced by car sharing and the resulting effects on mobility. Total emissions from the current car sharing market equal 1,025,589.36 t CO2e/year.
    [Show full text]
  • Robin Chase Self Driving Cars If We Understand That People Naturally Choose Easy & Cheap, & INFRASTRUCTURE IS DESTINY & AVS ARE IMMINENT (AT LEAST in CITIES)
    Wednesday Morning WTS @rmchase Future of Transport in 2 Movements 1. Infrastructure is Destiny 2. Build on Solid Ground This is the space required to move 60 people from A to B Personal car Bus Bicycle Source: City of Münster This is the space required to move 60 people from A to B Personal car DIDI Autonomous Vehicle #1 Infrastructure is Destiny Levittown, NY 1947-1951 Eisenhower Interstate Highway System 1956 + + 40 years of Cycle-friendly infrastructure building US Netherland s Km 47 864 cycled/person/yr % Obesity 36% 12% >15 yrs old HUMAN NATURE (Engineer-speak: “Personal infrastructure”) We strongly favor convenience (EASY) & (CHEAP) economics Equality in infrastructure IS THIS FAIR? • Is everyone getting where they need to go? • Are they paying the right price? In appropriate time? In good conditions? • Are we improving their travel conditions? For cars For people Over the last 100 years, we have specifically and proactively made personal cars easy and cheap. Over the last 100 years, we have specifically and proactively made personal cars easy and cheap. TAX & REGULATORY INFRASTRUCTURE We have underpriced: ● Air pollution ● Congestion ● Curb access (in conditions of scarcity) ● User fees for transportation infrastructure investment (in some countries) With market pricing misaligned with reality, we are overconsuming car travel. Our planetary infrastructure© 2017 VENIAM, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ≤ Scientists tell us we will be +5-6C with BAU Scientists predict +5-6C by 2100 under BAU th Globally: is this year hotter or colder than 20 C
    [Show full text]
  • Ride Fair: a Policy Framework for Managing Transportation Network Companies
    Ride Fair: A Policy Framework for Managing Transportation Network Companies MARCH 2019 AUTHORS FROM ITDP Dana Yanocha, Senior Research Associate Jacob Mason, Director of Research and Impact CONTRIBUTORS Aimee Gauthier, Chief Knowledge Officer, ITDP Karina Licea, Mobility and Tech Specialist Diego Silva, Travel Demand Management Coordinator, ITDP Brazil ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to acknowledge and thank the following experts for their assistance and feedback in the creation of this report: Bernardo Baranda, Regional Director for Latin America, ITDP Shreya Gadepalli, Regional Director South Asia, ITDP Santiago Fernandez Reyez, Urban Development Coordinator, ITDP Mexico Shanshan Li, Vice Country Director, ITDP China Rahul Madhusudanan, ITDP India Gonzalo Peon, Deputy Director, ITDP Mexico Bernardo Serra, Public Policy Coordinator, ITDP Brazil Jaime Aparicio, Laura Ballesteros, Kayli Cappucci, Miguel Abad Carillo, Drew Cooper, Warren Logan, Ramon Escobar, Onesimo Flores, Yolisa Kani, Juliana Minorello, Renato Picard and Rufino Leon Tovar. CONTENT 3 Executive Summary 5 Introduction 10 Methodology 11 Decision-Making Framework 13 Critical Regulatory Elements 23 Structural Barriers and Recommendations 31 Discussion & Next Steps 33 Appendix A: Case Study—Mexico City, Mexico 39 Appendix B: Case Study—São Paulo, Brazil 46 Appendix C: Case Study—Chicago, USA 50 Appendix D: Case Study—London, United Kingdom 54 Appendix E: Informational Interviews 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WHAT ARE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANIES? Defined as digital applications that match potential riders with drivers in real time, transportation network companies (TNCs) have been characterized by their ability to “disrupt,” forcing cities around the world to respond to a range of public concerns, plan for unknowns, and adapt to constantly evolving technologies, business models, and growing demands for flexible mobility options.
    [Show full text]
  • Cities Towards Mobility 2.0: Connect, Share and Go! Smart Choices for Cities Cities Towards Mobility 2.0: Connect, Share and Go!
    Smart choices for cities Cities towards Mobility 2.0: connect, share and go! Smart choices for cities Cities towards Mobility 2.0: connect, share and go! Pictures © Shutterstock, 2016, pages: 1, 7, 10, 13, 16, 21, 24, 27, 34, 38, 39, 42. 2 Smart choices for cities Cities towards Mobility 2.0: connect, share and go! Table of contents Preface. 4 Summary. 5 Introduction . 6 The.new.paradigm.of.Mobility.2 .0:.trends.and.challenges. 9 Shared-mobility.concepts.and.experiences . 13 Car sharing . 15 Bike sharing . 20 Ride sharing . 23 Ride sourcing . 26 Park sharing. 28 Shared freight mobility . 30 Impacts.and.benefits. 36 Environmental impacts: is shared mobility the green option? . 36 Does shared mobility expand social benefits and equity in transport accessibility?. 37 Economic impacts of shared mobility . 38 Role.of.public.authorities. 40 Conclusions. 43 References . 45 Web.references. 48 3 Smart choices for cities Cities towards Mobility 2.0: connect, share and go! Preface The objective of the CIVITAS WIKI project is to provide This new mobility paradigm has relevant impacts on cities information to European city planners, decision-makers and their mobility planning strategies and plans, and gives and citizens on clean urban transport and on the CIVITAS rise to several questions. How can cities best manage the Initiative. With its policy notes, WIKI wants to inform people emergence of these new shared-mobility services? How can in cities on a number of topics that currently play an important the relationship between private and public interests best be role in urban mobility. managed? What benefits and opportunities can be identified and exploited at city level? What challenges and potential This policy analysis focuses on the topic of shared mobility.
    [Show full text]
  • Shared Mobility Systems Gilbert Laporte, Frédéric Meunier, Roberto Wolfler Calvo
    Shared mobility systems Gilbert Laporte, Frédéric Meunier, Roberto Wolfler Calvo To cite this version: Gilbert Laporte, Frédéric Meunier, Roberto Wolfler Calvo. Shared mobility systems. 4OR: A Quar- terly Journal of Operations Research, Springer Verlag, 2015, 13 (4), pp.341-360. 10.1007/s10288-015- 0301-z. hal-01792763 HAL Id: hal-01792763 https://hal-enpc.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01792763 Submitted on 15 May 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. SHARED MOBILITY SYSTEMS GILBERT LAPORTE, FRED´ ERIC´ MEUNIER, AND ROBERTO WOLFLER CALVO Abstract. Shared mobility systems for bicycles and cars have grown in popularity in recent years and have attracted the attention of the operational research community. Researchers have investigated several problems arising at the strategic, tactical and operational levels. This survey paper classifies the relevant literature under five main headings: station location, fleet dimensioning, station inventory, rebalancing incentives, and vehicle repositioning. It closes with some open research questions. Key words: survey, shared mobility systems, bicycle and car sharing, fleet dimensioning, inventory rebalancing, vehicle repositioning. 1. Introduction The world of transportation has witnessed a mini-revolution in June 2007 with the launch- ing of the V´elib'bicycle sharing system in Paris.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing Demand Responsive Shared Transport Services Via Agent-Based Simulations
    TESTING DEMAND RESPONSIVE SHARED TRANSPORT SERVICES VIA AGENT-BASED SIMULATIONS Giuseppe Inturri, Nadia Giuffrida, Matteo Ignaccolo, Michela Le Pira, Alessandro Pluchino, Andrea Rapisarda University of Catania Abstract Demand Responsive Shared Transport (DRST) services take advantage of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), to provide “on demand” transport services booking in real time a ride on a shared vehicle. In this paper, an agent-based model (ABM) is presented to test different the feasibility of different service configurations in a real context. First results show the impact of route choice strategy on the system performance. Keywords: shared mobility, flexible transit, dynamic ride sharing, demand responsive transport, agent-based model Introduction This paper focuses on the potential contribution of innovative Demand Re- sponsive Shared Transport (DRST) services provided by a fleet of vehicles, booked by users via mobile device applications and scheduled in real-time to pick up and drop off passengers in accordance with their needs [1]. The system stands between an expensive conventional exclusive-ride door-to-door service (like a conventional taxi) and a flexible system where a dynamic sharing of trips makes users experiment longer travel distances and times while the vehicles drop off and pick up other pas- sengers (like a conventional transit). From the operator’s point of view, it is important to select the optimal strat- egy to assign vehicles to passengers’ requests, so to perform high load factor and low driven distance (to reduce operation costs), while minimizing the additional time and distances travelers have to experience (to assure the expected level of ser- vice).
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Factors Influencing the Sustainable Use Intention Of
    sustainability Article An Analysis of the Factors Influencing the Sustainable Use Intention of Urban Shared Bicycles in China Peng Shao * and Jie Liang School of Management, Xi’an Polytechnic University, Xi’an 710048, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-137-0914-2830 Received: 5 April 2019; Accepted: 6 May 2019; Published: 14 May 2019 Abstract: Bicycle sharing services have played an active role in building a green travel system in China, but this trend has also caused problems, such as users arbitrarily stopping on the roads or the destruction of shared bicycles. Based on data collected by means of a survey that we designed, a regression analysis is used to test the influence of use perception and consumer characteristics on the intention to sustainably use shared bicycles by measuring the intention to: continue using the service, park the bicycles in an orderly manner, and care and protect the bicycles. We find that: (1) perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, consumer innovation, and standardized use behavior have a significantly positive impact on the intention to continue using and park shared bicycles in an orderly manner; (2) perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and consumer innovation also have a significantly positive impact on the intention to care and protect shared bicycles; and, (3) standardized use behavior has no significant impact on the intention to care and protect shared bicycles. Moreover, urban air quality plays a positive regulatory role in the relationship of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and consumer innovation with the intention to sustainably use the service.
    [Show full text]
  • On-Demand Shared Transport
    ON-DEMAND On-Demand Shared Transport One technology platform to efficiently service more passengers. PRODUCT DETAILER: ON-DEMAND V.200330 LIFTANGO ON-DEMAND Optimise transport for real-time demand. Passenger demand changes. It’s never fixed. So why create more fixed route schedules? On-demand shared transport uses a dynamically routed system that constantly redesigns itself based on real-time passenger demand. This means, less wasted time driving from stop to stop and more time servicing passengers where they are. Overall, you get better patronage and improved utilisation of your fleet. On-Demand: Connecting the landscape. At its core, on-demand shared transport is designed to; • Allow commuters to access transport around their schedule • Increase shared trips • Be a sustainable form of transport • Replace inefficient fixed route transit services • Improve passenger catchment and integrate with the broader transport network • Reduce reliance on single-occupancy vehicle use 01 LIFTANGO ON-DEMAND Liftango Bus: Improving public transport. Activity 5.45pm Cost effective way to 5.48pm connect passengers Bus arriving at 3 West St to public transport REG MAKE YEAR SEATS 5.52pm 456ACM Mercedes 2019 � 8 283ACM Toyota 2018 � 1 � 6 Better coverage vs a fixed route service Your driver is on the way! VIEW BOOKING DETAILS Reduce parking pressure at mass transit hubs 02 LIFTANGO ON-DEMAND Liftango Shuttle: On-Demand Corporate Shuttles. Peak Demand Fleet Satisfy development Utilisation conditions with sustainable transport 92% +7% Passenger Count Requests 14 22 9 6 7 18 24 20 Mia Green Tim Haller Reduces parking pressure at high density economic hubs 6 41 BOARD NOW Decrease commute & fleet operating costs Bus departing from Connect the last-mile and integrate Vancouver Station in 4 minutes with mass transit services.
    [Show full text]
  • Dispossession, Displacement, and the Making of the Shared Minibus Taxi in Cape Town and Johannesburg, South Africa, 1930-Present
    Sithutha Isizwe (“We Carry the Nation”): Dispossession, Displacement, and the Making of the Shared Minibus Taxi in Cape Town and Johannesburg, South Africa, 1930-Present A Dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Elliot Landon James IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Allen F. Isaacman & Helena Pohlandt-McCormick November 2018 Elliot Landon James 2018 copyright Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................. ii List of Abbreviations ......................................................................................................iii Prologue .......................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1 ....................................................................................................................... 17 Introduction: Dispossession and Displacement: Questions Framing Thesis Chapter 2 ....................................................................................................................... 94 Historical Antecedents of the Shared Minibus Taxi: The Cape Colony, 1830-1930 Chapter 3 ..................................................................................................................... 135 Apartheid, Forced Removals, and Public Transportation in Cape Town, 1945-1978 Chapter 4 ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Shared Mobility – Where Now, Where Next? Second Report of the Commission on Travel Demand
    Shared mobility – where now, where next? Second report of the Commission on Travel Demand September 2019 Greg Marsden, Jillian Anable, Jonathan Bray, Elaine Seagriff and Nicola Spurling About the Commission on Travel Demand Shared Mobility Inquiry The Commission on Travel Demand is an expert group established as part of our work to explore how to reduce the energy and carbon emissions associated with transport. The Commission’s first report reviewed declining trends in per capita travel across the UK and the reasons for this. The future work programme will focus on other areas of policy which are critical to rapid decarbonisation. This inquiry focuses on shared mobility and the potential to increase the occupancy of vehicles in-use, reduce individual ownership of assets and enhance multi-modal travel. We are using the term ‘shared mobility’ to mean: • Shared ownership: where the use of the vehicle asset is shared across individuals incorporating various models of commercially or peer-to-peer operated ‘car club’s’/ car sharing schemes, fractional car ownership, bike sharing schemes. • Shared at the point of use: Car/ride sharing (or trip sharing) – rides that are actually shared between different individuals or different parties, sometimes paid separately. In the future, this may include ‘robot taxis’ as shared mobility where the vehicle is shared across individuals. Reference This report should be referenced as: Marsden, G., Anable, J., Bray, J., Seagriff, E. and Spurling, N. 2019. Shared mobility: where now? where next? The second report of the Commission on Travel Demand. Centre for Reseach into Energy Demand Solutions. Oxford. ISBN: 978-1-913299-01-9 Authors: • Prof Greg Marsden, University of Leeds • Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Order Dispatch in Price-Aware Ridesharing
    Order Dispatch in Price-aware Ridesharing Libin Zheng Lei Chen Jieping Ye Hong Kong University of Hong Kong University of Didi Research Institute, Didi Science and Technology Science and Technology Chuxing Hong Kong, China Hong Kong, China Beijing, China [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT With the prevalence of car-hailing applications, ridesharing be- comes more and more popular because of its great potential in mon- etary saving and environmental protection. Order dispatch is the ' % % ! !" !$ key problem in ridesharing, which has a strong impact on riders’ $ experience and platform’s performance. Existing order dispatch re- # search works fail to consider the price of the orders, which can be &" !" an important reference because it directly relates to the platform’s !' !% profit. Our work takes the order price into concern, and formulates ( ( a constrained optimization problem, which takes platform’s profit as the optimization objective and performs controls on riders’ de- Figure 1: Example 1. tour distance and waiting time. We prove the problem is NP-hard, thus, we propose approximation methods. We further develop a simulation framework based on real ridesharing order and vehicle The dial-a-ride problem (DARP) [8, 10, 5, 16] has been widely data. We conduct experiments with this simulation framework to studied in the past years, which is a variant of the vehicle routing evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed methods. problem [19] with time window constraints for pick-up and drop- off. The problem of adopting these methods lies in their setting that PVLDB Reference Format: Libin Zheng, Lei Chen and Jieping Ye.
    [Show full text]
  • A Method to Define the Spatial Stations Location in a Carsharing System in São Paulo -Brazil
    The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XLII-4/W11, 2018 3rd International Conference on Smart Data and Smart Cities, 4–5 October 2018, Delft, The Netherlands A method to define the spatial stations location in a carsharing system in São Paulo -Brazil M. O. Lage 1, *, C. A. S. Machado 1, F. Berssaneti 2, J. A. Quintanilha 1 1 Dept. of Transportation Engineering, Polytechnic School, University of São Paulo, Avenida Professor Almeida Prado, Travessa 2, n. 83, São Paulo, Brazil – [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 2 Dept. of Production Engineering, Polytechnic School, University of São Paulo, Avenida Professor Luciano Gualberto, n. 1380, São Paulo, Brazil - [email protected] Commission VI, WG VI/4 KEY WORDS: Transportation Systems, Spatial Analysis, Carsharing Station Location. ABSTRACT: Sharing mobility systems have become part of a sociodemographic trend that has pushed shared modes from the fringe to the mainstream of the transportation systems. Carsharing is a mode of shared transport, where a service is offered in which several people share the access and use of a set of vehicles. This is a relatively new mode of urban transport, which gives users access for short periods of rental, thus providing the benefits of using private vehicles, while avoiding the inherent property charges of a vehicle. The objective of the article searches for the identification and selection of preferred areas in the São Paulo City (Brazil) to implement a prototype of a carsharing system. The adopted methodology of demand analysis identifies the spatial patterns of the intervening variables of socioeconomic information, transportation and land use, in order to understand the current panorama of the demand for transport in São Paulo.
    [Show full text]