DOCSLIB.ORG

Download (11MB)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download (11MB) https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ Theses Digitisation: https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/research/enlighten/theses/digitisation/ This is a digitised version of the original print thesis. Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] VOLUME 1 THE ARCHAEOLOGY AND GEOGRAPHY OF SHETLAND BROCHS ✓ BY NOEL FOJUT Thesis presented in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts, University of Glasgow. October, 1979. ProQuest Number: 10984309 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10984309 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 r c c t its, mci it j ' o ? . le i : 3 Vord < ..: ly -wai i ■: : ■ in looks c m on the broch ruins at Burra f 5 - th , in northern Unst. VOLUME 1 Table of Contents Page Acknowledgements 1 Summary of Thesis i Preface : Origins of this study 1 Section I : Archaeological Discussions Definitions 5 Chapter I The Archaeology of Brochs, and Shetland ° Chapter I I A Brief Survey of Broch Archaeology to Date 1 0 Phases ^ 0 Broch Studies to 1945 ^ 1945 to 1975 19 Broch Studies in 1980 ^9 Postscript 51 Chapter III — Critical Review of Some Current Theories regarding the Cultural Affinities and Structural Evolution of Brochs 3 2 Jarlshof (Hamilton, 1956) 34 Clickhimin (Hamilton, 1968) 37 Dun Mor Vaul (MacKie, 1974) 51 Architectural Analysis 60 The Theories Compared 63 The Northern Origin 63 Western Origins 6 6 Discussion : Structural Sequences 69 Cultural Affinities 70 Synthesis : Via Media ? 74 Chapter I V Major Unresolved Research Themes 78 Themes 7 9 Possibilities 80 1) Nature and Function of Brochs 80 2) The Need for Brochs 85 3) The Broch Builders 91 4) The Distribution of Brochs 92 5) Economic Activities 94 6) Date of Construction 96 Page Chapter IV (continued) Status of ’'Subsidiary" Structures 99 Summary 103 Chapter V -- Shetland Brochs : Earlier Work ''t 0*5 Chapter VI — The Material Culture Associated with Shetland Brochs 125 Pottery 126 Non-Ceramic Material 1 34 Glass 134- Metal 134 Worked Bone 136 Wood 137 Worked Stone ^39 Evidence for Economic Activities ^ 4-6 Direct Evidence ^ 4-6 Indirect Evidence ^ 4-9 Chapter VII - The Structure, Outbuildings and Defensive Works of Shetland Brochs -j 51 Note : Preservation of Features i 5 An Analytical Discussion of Available Data 154 Broch Structure 156 Structural Correlations 170 Structure : Conclusions 171 "Subsidiary" Structures 173 Internal Structures 173 External Structures 177 Subsidiary Structures : Conclusions 180 External Defensive Works 182 Discussion 1 91 Allied Structures 193 Chapter VIII The Significance of Shetland 1 95 Progress 199 Acknowledgements With so many people to thank, it is difficult to know how to start and inevitably a line must be drawn. This still leaves many people, such as the landowners and natives of Shetland, without specific tribute. But of those who helped directly (if at times inadvertently) in the furtherance of this research, I must record my gratitude to Professor Leslie Alcock, Archaeology Department, and Dr. Euan MacKie, Hunterian Museum, of the University of Glasgow, my research supervisors, the former of whom made available his great knowledge of the procedures of archaeology, and the latter his personal store of information. Both stimulated many of the discussions which follow, although at times these differ strangely from the versions they will recall. The other members of staff, both academic and technical, gave unstinting help. The other occupants of the post-graduate students' room over three years bore with forebearance the geographical cuckoo y in their nest, and provided much coffee and conversation. Outside Glasgow, Mr. Roger Mercer and Dr. Trevor Watkins of Edinburgh's Archaeology Department made many useful comments, as did Mr. Peter Hill. The Geography Department of Aberdeen University supplied^mainly through Mr. Ian Ralston, my introduction to Scottish Archaeology, Shetland and the geographical techniques so cruelly used within this thesis. Dr. Fairhurst, formerly of the Archaeology- Department, Glasgow University, Mr. John Hedges of North of Scotland Archaeological Services and Mrs. Lorna Main of Central Regional Council have allowed me to use unpublished material from excavations, as has Dr. MacKie. Dr. Raymond Lamb, the Orkney Heritage Society . Field Archaeologist, allowed me to use his Ph.D. thesis on the promontory fortifications of the north, and discussed its contents with me, as did Dr. MacKie the contents of his own Ph.D. thesis on brochs. The latter formed the largest single source of information used. On the theoretical aspects, Dr. David Heisler of University of Missouri (now at University/ University of Southern Mississippi) allowed me to quote and disagree with, his Ph.D. thesis on Man-Land Relationships in Iron Age Caithness, and discussed statistical approaches in general, as did Mr. Peter Winham of Southampton University (now excavating in Winchester). Two undergraduate dissertations were particularly useful. Miss Jane Blair's discussion of Keiss South (Edinburgh) and Miss Paula Love's gazetteer and discussion of broch subsidiary structures in Orkney, Caithness and Sutherland (Glasgow). The latter discusses many of the arguments considered here, and helped to prevent many of them going astray. In Shetland, the staff of the Lerwick Museum and Library, particularly the past and present Curators, Mr. Tom Henderson and Mr. Andrew Williamson gave me advice, encouragement, information, shelter and assistance. Miss Ailsa Robertson of the Glasgow Department assisted with transport and1 surveying during the 1978 field work. To all of these must go thanks for help, academic and practical, without which this thesis could not have been begun, but there are more personal thanks to render; to Miss Paula Love who encouraged me throughout the tedium of preparing the final draft, and allowed me to talk brochs ad nauseam, and lastly to my family, who cheerfully supported and housed a windswept field worker upon my periodic collapses. Without these, this thesis would never have been completed. This research was undertaken under a grant from the Scottish Education Department's Major Scottish Studentship scheme, and was materially assisted by a grant from the University of Glasgow's Graduate Awards Scheme. All of the opinions expressed here, regardless of the above acknowledgements, are those of the author alone, who takes full responsibility for any errors and misrepresentations. The Archaeology and Geography of Shetland Brochs : Summary This thesis represents the results of extensive field survey in Shetland, supported by bibliographical research and by the inspection of private and public collections of arte factual material. The aims of research were twofold : to establish the place of Shetland in the development and spread of brochs in Scotland, and to investigate the palaeogeography of the period, with a view to extending the knowledge of Iron Age Shetland available from more traditional, excavation-based, studies. These two objectives determined the structure of the presentation of results. Section 1 deals with the structural and artefactual evidence. It commences by setting the Scottish scene, and proceeds to detail the Shetland portion of this. A review of published work concerning brochs is followed by a critical review of certain aspects of current theory. This discusses the three major published excavations (Jarlshof, Clickhimin and Dun Mor Vaul) in detail, together with theories of architectural evolution. Certain reinterpretations are proposed, and a scheme of origin and development advanced which attempts to reconcile the well-founded portions of both of the main schools of thought (the western and northern origin theories). It is suggested that too little attention has been paid to possible connections with the archaeology of Eastern Scotland, and too much to the West. This section continues with a discussion of major outstanding research themes connected with brochs. It is suggested that while definitive answers are generally not to be found, it is usually possible to outline the broad limits of possible solutions to many of the questions asked about brochs. These themes are not carried into detail, as adequate information does not exist to give meaning to such an analysis. Once this essential, but general, material has been concluded, the specifically Shetland content commences with a thorough review of published and unpublished research into brochs and allied sites in the Islands. This leads on to a detailed analysis of the material culture of the period, and the elements of this are compared, both in type and in style, to the Scottish synopsis presented by MacKie (1973). It is demonstrated that certain preconceptions, particularly concerning the ceramic sequence, are not justified by fact. This has resulted in the incorrect dating (in relative terms) of Shetland’s brochs. Material evidence regarding the economic activities of the broch-period population is introduced, and its limitations discussed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Theses Digitisation: This Is a Digitised
    https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ Theses Digitisation: https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/research/enlighten/theses/digitisation/ This is a digitised version of the original print thesis. Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] VOLUME 3 ( d a t a ) ter A R t m m w m m d geq&haphy 2 1 SHETLAND BROCKS Thesis presented in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor 6f Philosophy in the Facility of Arts, University of Glasgow, 1979 ProQuest Number: 10984311 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10984311 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Anne R Johnston Phd Thesis
    ;<>?3 ?3@@8393;@ 6; @53 6;;3> 530>623? 1/# *%%"&(%%- B6@5 ?=316/8 >343>3;13 @< @53 6?8/;2? <4 9A88! 1<88 /;2 @6>33 /OOG ># 7PJOSTPO / @JGSKS ?UDNKTTGF HPR TJG 2GIRGG PH =J2 CT TJG AOKVGRSKTY PH ?T# /OFRGWS &++& 4UMM NGTCFCTC HPR TJKS KTGN KS CVCKMCDMG KO >GSGCREJ.?T/OFRGWS,4UMM@GXT CT, JTTQ,$$RGSGCREJ"RGQPSKTPRY#ST"COFRGWS#CE#UL$ =MGCSG USG TJKS KFGOTKHKGR TP EKTG PR MKOL TP TJKS KTGN, JTTQ,$$JFM#JCOFMG#OGT$&%%'($'+)% @JKS KTGN KS QRPTGETGF DY PRKIKOCM EPQYRKIJT Norse settlement in the Inner Hebrides ca 800-1300 with special reference to the islands of Mull, Coll and Tiree A thesis presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Anne R Johnston Department of Mediaeval History University of St Andrews November 1990 IVDR E A" ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS None of this work would have been possible without the award of a studentship from the University of &Andrews. I am also grateful to the British Council for granting me a scholarship which enabled me to study at the Institute of History, University of Oslo and to the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs for financing an additional 3 months fieldwork in the Sunnmore Islands. My sincere thanks also go to Prof Ragni Piene who employed me on a part time basis thereby allowing me to spend an additional year in Oslo when I was without funding. In Norway I would like to thank Dr P S Anderson who acted as my supervisor. Thanks are likewise due to Dr H Kongsrud of the Norwegian State Archives and to Dr T Scmidt of the Place Name Institute, both of whom were generous with their time.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the .Pdf
    Regional Archaeological Research Framework for Argyll: Chapter 7 http://www.scottishheritagehub.com/rarfa/ironage Appendix 1: Excavated Forts, Duns and Brochs in Argyll (ordered by date of first excavation) Site Name Type NMRS No. Location First Other References Excavated Years Dun Mac Sniachan fort NM93NW 2 Lorn 1873 1874 Smith 1875 Dun Boraige Mor broch NL94NW 1 Tiree 1880 Piggot 1952 Dun Mor Vaul broch NM04NW 3 Tiree 1880 1962-4 MacKie 1974, 1997 Suidhe Chennaidh dun NN02SW 1 Lorn 1890 Christison 1891 Leccamore/South dun NM171SE 2 Lorn 1890 1892 MacNaughton; 1891, 1893 Dun an Fheurain dun NM82NW 9 Lorn 1895 1950, Anderson 1895a; Ritchie 1974 1963 Dun Nighean dun NL94SE 1 Tiree 1881 Sands 1882 Dun na Cleite dun NL93NE 5 Tiree 1881 Sands 1882 Ardifuir dun NR79NE 2 Mid Argyll 1904 Christison 1905 Druim and Duin dun NR79SE 1 Mid Argyll 1904 Christison 1905 Duntroon fort NR89NW 10 Mid Argyll 1904 Christison 1905; Craw 1930; Lane and Campbell 2000 Dunadd fort NR89SW 1 Mid Argyll 1904 1905, Christison 1905 1929, Dunagoil fort NS056SE 4 Bute 1913 19801914-1 Mann 1915; Mann 1925; Harding 2004b 15, 1919, 1925 Section 7: The Iron Age Page 1 Regional Archaeological Research Framework for Argyll: Chapter 7 http://www.scottishheritagehub.com/rarfa/ironage Site Name Type NMRS No. Location First Other References Excavated Years Dun Breac dun NR85NE 17 Kintyre 1914 Graham 1915 Clachan Ard dun NS05NW 3 Bute 1933 MacCallum; 1959, 1963 Eilean Buidhe dun NS07NW 4 Bute 1936 Maxwell 1941 Kildonan Bay dun NR72NE 5 Kintyre 1936 1937-38 Fairhurst 1939; Peltonberg
    [Show full text]
  • Kintour Landscape Survey Report
    DUN FHINN KILDALTON, ISLAY AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY DATA STRUCTURE REPORT May 2017 Roderick Regan Summary The survey of Dun Fhinn and its associated landscape has revealed a picture of an area extensively settled and utilised in the past dating from at least the Iron Age and very likely before. In the survey area we see settlements developing across the area from at least the 15 th century with a particular concentration of occupation on or near the terraces of the Kintour River. Without excavation or historical documentation dating these settlements is fraught with difficulty but the distinct differences between the structures at Ballore and Creagfinn likely reflect a chronological development between the pre-improvement and post-improvement settlements, the former perhaps a relatively rare well preserved survival. Ballore Kilmartin Museum Argyll, PA31 8RQ Tel: 01546 510 278 [email protected] Scottish Charity SC022744 ii Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Archaeological and Historical Background 2 2.1 Cartographic Evidence of Settlement 4 2.2 Some Settlement History 6 2.3 A Brief History of Landholding on Islay 10 3. Dun Fhinn 12 4. Walkover Survey Results 23 5. Discussion 47 6. References 48 Appendix 1: Canmore Extracts 50 The Survey Team iii 1. Introduction This report collates the results of the survey of Dun Fhinn and a walkover survey of the surrounding landscape. The survey work was undertaken as part of the Ardtalla Landscape Project a collaborative project between Kilmartin Museum and Reading University, which forms part of the wider Islay Heritage Project. The survey area is situated on the Ardtalla Estate within Kildalton parish in the south east of Islay (Figure 1) and survey work was undertaken in early April 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Hermes' Portal Issue
    Hermes’ Portal Issue #15 Hermes’ Portal Issue n° 15 October 2005 Who’s who . .3 Publisher’s corner . .3 Treasures of the Sea . .5 by Christopher Gribbon A Gazetteer of the Kingdom of Man and the Isles . .5 The Out Isles . .5 Running a Game on Man . .20 Appendix II: Dramatis Personae . .27 Appendix III: Island Families . .39 Appendix IV: Kings of Man and the Isles . .43 Appendix V: Bishops of Sodor and Man . .43 Appendix VI: Genealogy of the Royal Family of Man . .44 Appendix VI: Timeline of Major Events . .47 Appendix VII: Glossary . .49 Appendix VIII: Manx Gaelic . .52 Vis sources . .54 by Sheila Thomas and John Post Complicating the 5th Edition Combat System . .58 by Ty Larson Liturgical cursing . .61 by Sheila Thomas Omnibus Grimoire Scroll X: Vim . .65 by Andrew Gronosky Hermes’ portal Publisher: Hermes’ Portal Contributors: Christopher Gribbon, Andrew Gronosky, Tyler Larson, John Post, Sheila Thomas. Illustrations: Scott Beattie (p. 5, 15, 17, 32, 35), Radja Sauperamaniane (back), Angela Taylor (p. 4, 8, 11, 16, 18, 55, 57, 60, 62, 64, 67), Alexander White (cover, border & p. 22, 24) & Lacroix P., Sciences & Lettres au Moyen-Age … (Firmin-Didot, Paris, 1877). Editorial and proofreading help: Sheila Thomas, layout: Eric Kouris Thanks: All the people who submitted ideas, texts, illustrations or helped in the production of this issue. Hermes’ Portal is an independent publication dedicated to Ars Magica players. Hermes’ Portal is available through email only. Hermes’ Portal is not affiliated with Atlas Games or White Wolf Gaming Studio. References to trademarks of those companies are not intended to infringe upon the rights of those parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Dun Telve and Dun Troddan (Glenelg)
    Property in Care (PIC) ID: PIC330 & PIC331 Designations: Scheduled Monument (SM90152) Taken into State care: 1885 (Guardianship) Last reviewed: 2004 HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT SCOTLAND STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE DUN TELVE AND DUN TRODDAN (GLENELG) We continually revise our Statements of Significance, so they may vary in length, format and level of detail. While every effort is made to keep them up to date, they should not be considered a definitive or final assessment of our properties. Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH DUN TELVE AND DUN TRODDAN BRIEF DESCRIPTION The monument comprises two broch towers that are sited less than 500m apart in the valley of Gleann Beag in Glenelg. Dun Telve stands near the river and about one third of its wall still stands to a height of over 10m. Dun Troddan is set on a terrace in the hillside a little further up the Glen. About one third of the wall survives to a height of 7.6m and it is very like its neighbour in structural detail. Each is accessible by a short walk from the road. CHARACTER OF THE MONUMENT Historical Overview • There is a rich and fascinating antiquarian and later history associated with the discovery and interpretation of broch towers/complex roundhouses as a whole. Early antiquarian drawings exist for these monuments: Alexander Gordon, about 1720; Pennant in 1772. These monuments attracted attention from an early date because they are so well-preserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Land, Stone, Trees, Identity, Ambition
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Land, stone, trees, identity, ambition Citation for published version: Romankiewicz, T 2015, 'Land, stone, trees, identity, ambition: The building blocks of brochs', The Archaeological Journal, vol. 173 , no. 1, pp. 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00665983.2016.1110771 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1080/00665983.2016.1110771 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: The Archaeological Journal General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 01. Oct. 2021 Land, Stone, Trees, Identity, Ambition: the Building Blocks of Brochs Tanja Romankiewicz Brochs are impressive stone roundhouses unique to Iron Age Scotland. This paper introduces a new perspective developed from architectural analysis and drawing on new survey, fieldwork and analogies from anthropology and social history. Study of architectural design and constructional detail exposes fewer competitive elements than previously anticipated. Instead, attempts to emulate, share and communicate identities can be detected. The architectural language of the broch allows complex layers of individual preferences, local and regional traditions, and supra-regional communications to be expressed in a single house design.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of Books and Monographs
    Catalogue of Books and Monographs (last updated Nov 2006) The Archaeological Sites and Monuments of Scotland. Edinburgh, RCAHMS. Doon Hill: 3 diagrams of structures: 1) two structures, 2) area (with pencil marks) 3) halls A and B. Dumbarton Publication Drawings: 1) Description of illustrations 2) 16 diagrams and maps (4 maps of Scotland, rest diagrams (some cross-section). Kinnelhead and Drannandow: Maps of Kinnelhead sites (1-4, 6) and Drannandow (5, 7), with natural features, structures. Paper, some sellotaped together and fragile. North of Scotland Archaeological Services. Round House & Compass Circles: 2 diagrams 1) on left has concentric circles, probably done with compass, with numbers 2) on right plan of Round house (?) P2 with numbers and word 'Deu . ' (1923). A guide to the Anglo-Saxon and foreign teutonic antiquities in the Department of British and Mediaeval Antiquities. London, British Museum. (1925). A guide to antiquities of the early Iron Age in the Department of British and Medieval Antiquities. Oxford, Oxford University Press for the British Museum. (1926). A guide to antiquities of the Stone Age in the Department of British and Mediaeval Antiquities. Oxford, Oxford University Press for the British Museum. (1927). London and the Vikings. London. (1936). Proceedings of the Warrington Literary and Philosophical Society 1933-1936. Warrington, John Walker & Co. Ltd. (1937). The Archeological Journal. London, Royal Archaeological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. 94 (XCIV). (1940). Medieval catalogue. London, The London Museum. (1947). Field Archaeology. Some Notes for Beginners issued by the Ordnance Survey. London, HMSO. (1947). The Sutton Hoo Ship-Burial. A Provisional Guide. London, Trustees of the British Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • The Typological Study of the Structures of the Scottish Brochs Roger Martlew*
    Proc Soc Antiq Scot, 112 (1982), 254-276 The typological study of the structures of the Scottish brochs Roger Martlew* SUMMARY brieA f revie f publishewo d work highlight varyine sth g qualit f informatioyo n available th n eo structural features of brochs, and suggests that the evidence is insufficient to support the current far- reaching theories of broch origins and evolution. The use of numerical data for classification is discussed, and a cluster analysis of broch dimensions is presented. The three groups suggested by this analysis are examined in relation to geographical location, and to duns and 'broch-like' structures in Argyll. While the method is concluded to be useful, an improve- qualit e mendate th th necessar s an f i i t y o improvyo t interpretationd ai resulte o et th d san . INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF PUBLISHED WORK The brochs of Scotland have attracted a considerable amount of attention over the years, from the antiquarians of the last century to archaeologists currently working on both rescue and research projects. Modern development principlee th n si techniqued san excavationf so , though, have been applie vero brochsdt w yfe . Severa excavatione th f o lpase decade w th fe tf o s s have indeed been more careful research-orientated projects tha indiscriminate nth e diggin lase th t f go century, when antiquarians seemed intent on clearing out the greatest number of brochs in the shortest possible time. The result, however, is that a considerable amount of material from brochs exists in museum collections, but much of it is from excavations carried out with slight regard for stratigraphy and is consequently of little use in answering the detailed questions set by modern hypotheses.
    [Show full text]
  • Quern Replacement and the Origin of the Broths Seamas Caulfield”
    Quern replacement and the origin of the broths Seamas Caulfield” Ever since the broths of the Atlantic Province captured the interest of antiquarians in the last century one of the unanswered questions has been the area in which this unified building and defence tradition originated. In modern studies archaeologists such as Childe (1935) and Hamilton (1968) argued that the concentration of broths in the northern sub-Province indicated that there was the most likely area of origin. MacKie (1965; 1971; 1972) has however argued in a number of papers that the origin of the broths lies in the west where they developed under the stimulus of southern English migrants arriving in the Hebrides in the 1st~century BC. As evidence of this immigration one of the new exotic artefacts which MacKie derives from the Wessex area is the flat rotary querns which he contrasts with the Beehive querns of Southern Scotland and which he sees as clear imports from the south of England. It is intended to deal elsewhere with the absence of any link between the querns of Wessex and those of the Hebrides and the implications of this for the English migrants hypothesis. However a study of the more fundamental contrast between broths with saddle querns and those with rotary querns appears to offer a better basis for estab- lishing the claim of the western or northern area within the Atlantic Province as the area of origin of the broth. One of the merits of the quern as an object of study in this regard is that it is prob- ably the most imperishable and ubiquitous artefact associated with the broths.
    [Show full text]
  • Belhelvie; Birse; Broomend, Inverurie; Cairn- Hill, Monquhitter
    INDEX PAGE Aberdeenshire: see Ardiffiiey, Crudeii; Amber Object s: Necklace s :— Barra HillMeldrumd Ol , ; Belhelvie; from Dun-an-Iardhard, Skye, . 209 Birse; Broomend, Inverurie; Cairn- ,, Huntiscarth, Harray, Orkney5 21 , hill, Monquhitter; Cairnhill Quarry, ,, Lake near Stonehenge, Wilt- Culsalmond; Castlehill of Kintore; shire, .....5 21 . Colpy; Crookmore, Tullynessle; Cul- ,, Lanarkshire (amber and jet) . 211 salmond ; Culsalmond, Kirk of; Fy vie; Amphora, Handle of, found at Traprain Gartly; Glenmailen; Huntly; Huiitly Law, Haddingtonshire, ... 94 Castle; Kintore; Knockargity, Tar- Amulet, Stone, foun t Udala d , North Uist land ; Leslie; Logie Elphinstone; (purchase), ...... 16 Newton of Lewesk, Eayne; Rayne; Anderson, Archibald, death of, ... 3 Slains ; Straloch; Tarland; Tocher- Anderson , presentG. , . RevS . sR . Roman ford ; WMteside; Woodside Croft, melon-shaped Bead, .... 256 Culsalmond. Anglian Cross-shaft, Inscription 011, from Aberfeldy, Perthshire Weeme ,se . Urswick Church8 5 , Yorkshire . , Abernethy, Fife Castle se , e Law. IslesAnguse th f , o Sea , ...lof 1 6 . Adair's Maps, ....... 26 Animal Remains from Traprain Law, Adam, Gordon Purvis, presents Tokef no Haddingtonshire, Report on, . 142 Lead, ........ 152 Anne, Silver Coins of, found at Montcoffer, Advocates' Library, Edinburgh . Map,MS s Banffshire, ...... 276 in, .......5 2 . Anniversary Meeting, ....1 . Adze, Stone, from Nigeria (donation), . 63 Antonine Itinerary, Roads in, . 21, 23, 32, 35 Ainslie, County Maps by, .... 28 Antoninus Pius, Coi , nof ...9 13 . Airieouland Crannog, Wigtownshire, Per- Antony, Mark, Coin of, ..... 137 forated Jet Ring from, .... 226 Anvil Stone foun t Mertouna d , Berwick- Alexander III., Long single cross Sterling shire, . ' . .312 of, (donation) .....5 25 . Aqua Vitae in Scotland, Note on the Early Alexander, W. Lindsay, death of,..3 .
    [Show full text]
  • Excavation of an Iron Age, Early Historic and Medieval Settlement and Metalworking Site at Eilean Olabhat, North Uist
    Proc Soc Antiq Scot 138 (2008), 27–104 EXCAVATION AT EILEAN OLABHAT, NORTH UIST | 27 Excavation of an Iron Age, Early Historic and medieval settlement and metalworking site at Eilean Olabhat, North Uist Ian Armit*, Ewan Campbell† and Andrew Dunwell‡ with contributions from Rupert Housley, Fraser Hunter, Adam Jackson, Melanie Johnson, Dawn McLaren, Jennifer Miller, K R Murdoch, Jennifer Thoms, and Graeme Warren and illustrations by Alan Braby, Craig Evenden, Libby Mulqueeny and Leeanne Whitelaw ABSTRACT The promontory site of Eilean Olabhat, North Uist was excavated between 1986 and 1990 as part of the Loch Olabhat Research Project. It was shown to be a complex enclosed settlement and industrial site with several distinct episodes of occupation. The earliest remains comprise a small Iron Age building dating to the middle centuries of the first millennium BC , which was modified on several occasions prior to its abandonment. Much later, the Early Historic remains comprise a small cellular building, latterly used as a small workshop within which fine bronze and silverwork was produced in the fifth to seventh centuries AD . Evidence of this activity is represented by quantities of mould and crucible fragments as well as tuyère and other industrial waste products. The site subsequently fell into decay for a second time prior to its medieval reoccupation probably in the 14th to 16th centuries AD . Eilean Olabhat has produced a well-stratified, though discontinuous, structural and artefactual sequence from the mid-first millennium BC to the later second millennium AD , and has important implications for ceramic development in the Western Isles over that period, as well as providing significant evidence for the nature and social context of Early Historic metalworking.
    [Show full text]