Active Dust Devils on Mars
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ACTIVE DUST DEVILS ON MARS: A COMPARISON OF SIX SPACECRAFT LANDING SITES by Devin Waller A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Approved April 2011 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Ronald Greeley, Chair Philip Christensen Randall Cerveny ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY May 2011 ABSTRACT Dust devils have proven to be commonplace on Mars, although their occurrence is unevenly distributed across the surface. They were imaged or inferred by all six successful landed spacecraft: the Viking 1 and 2 Landers (VL-1 and VL-2), Mars Pathfinder Lander, the Mars Exploration Rovers Spirit and Opportunity, and the Phoenix Mars Lander. Comparisons of dust devil parameters were based on results from optical and meteorological (MET) detection campaigns. Spatial variations were determined based on comparisons of their frequency, morphology, and behavior. The Spirit data spanning three consecutive martian years is used as the basis of comparison because it is the most extensive on this topic. Average diameters were between 8 and 115 m for all observed or detected dust devils. The average horizontal speed for all of the studies was roughly 5 m/s. At each site dust devil densities peaked between 09:00 and 17:00 LTST during the spring and summer seasons supporting insolation-driven convection as the primary formation mechanism. Seasonal number frequency averaged ~1 dust devils/ km2/sol and spanned a total of three orders of magnitude. Extrapolated number frequencies determined for optical campaigns at the Pathfinder and Spirit sites accounted for temporal and spatial inconsistencies and averaged ~19 dust devils/km2/sol. Dust fluxes calculated from Pathfinder data (5x10-4 kg/m2/s and 7x10-5 kg/m2/s) were well with in the ranges calculated from Spirit data (4.0x10-9 to 4.6x10-4 kg/m2/s for Season One, 5.2x10-7 to 6.2x10-5 kg/m2/s during Season Two, and 1.5x10-7 to 1.6x10-4 kg/m2/s during Season Three). Based on the results a campaign is written for improvements in dust devil i detection at the Mars Science Laboratory's (MSL) site. Of the four remaining candidate MSL sites, the dusty plains of Gale crater may potentially be the site with the highest probability of dust devil activity. ii DEDICATION I dedicate this accomplishment to my mother, Linda Watts, who has stood by my side every step of this process. Without her love, understanding, endless support, and guidance this journey would have been significantly more difficult. I thank her for leading by example and always reminding me to stay positive. Thanks to her I’ve remained steadfast in my persistence to finish my graduate degree. I look forward to a very bright future. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It is my pleasure to thank those who made this thesis possible. I owe my deepest gratitude to Ronald Greeley who has served as my professor, advisor, and chairman of my supervisory committee. I thank him for the academic opportunities he has provided, for the guidance and advice that he has given, and for the many discussions we have had that have assisted me throughout this process. I especially thank him for allowing me the opportunity to work in active mission operations as a geology theme lead on the Mars Exploration Rover project. I am grateful to my committee members Phil Christensen and Randy Cervany for their insightful discussions that have helped improve my general understanding of aeolian processes that occur on Mars and Earth. The foundation of this thesis would not have been possible without the hours of discussion had with my colleagues Shane Thompson, Lynn Neakrase and Patrick Whelley. I would also like to thank Charles Bradbury whose technical assistance and advice were invaluable. I would like to acknowledge my fellow Planetary Geology Group members and graduate students for their support and advice throughout this process. Last, but certainly not least, I am grateful for my family and friends who were always there for me during the writing of this thesis. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES .....................................................................................................vi LIST OF FIGURES...................................................................................................vii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................ 1 1.1 Background...............................................................................................1 1.1.1 Dust in the Martian Atmosphere ................................................1 1.1.2 Formation of Dust Devils on Mars.............................................6 1.1.3 Detection of Dust Devils with Landed Spacecraft...................11 1.2 Objective of Study ..................................................................................15 CHAPTER 2 LANDING SITE OVERVIEW...................................................... 17 2.1 Chapter Overview...................................................................................17 2.2 Instruments Used in Dust Devil and Vortex Detection..........................17 2.3 Landing Sites ..........................................................................................30 2.3.1 Viking Lander 1 ........................................................................30 2.3.2 Viking Lander 2 ........................................................................35 2.3.3 Mars Pathfinder Lander ............................................................39 2.3.4 Mars Exploration Rover Spirit..................................................45 2.3.5 Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity.......................................51 2.3.6 Phoenix Mars Lander................................................................54 CHAPTER 3 COMPARISONS AND RESULTS ............................................... 59 3.1 Chapter Overview...................................................................................59 3.2 Landing Site Characteristics...................................................................59 v 3.3 Dust Devil Morphology..........................................................................63 3.4 Dust Devil Speeds...................................................................................76 3.5 Diurnal and Seasonal Frequency............................................................81 3.6 Number Frequency .................................................................................94 3.7 Dust Flux.................................................................................................98 3.8 Dust Loading.........................................................................................100 CHAPTER 4 DISCUSSION AND PREDICTIONS ......................................... 101 4.1 Discussion ............................................................................................101 4.2 Mars Science Laboratory......................................................................104 4.2.1 MSL Dust Devil Detection Campaign ...................................107 4.2.2 Candidate Landing Sites and Predictions...............................109 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................... 114 vi LIST OF TABLES Table Page 2.1 Mission operation dates, total sols, locations, and coordinates .................. 17 2.2 Optical instruemnts used in dust devil detection ........................................ 19 2.3 Meteorological instruemnts used in vortex detection ................................. 20 3.1 Rock abundance chart ................................................................................. 61 3.2 TES thermal inertia and surface albedo ...................................................... 62 3.3 Range of dust devil diameters ..................................................................... 74 3.4 Range of dust devil speeds .......................................................................... 79 3.5 Number of vortices detected at the Viking Lander sites ............................ 90 3.6 Seasonal number frequencies ..................................................................... 97 3.7 Extrapolated number frequencies .............................................................. 98 4.1 Dust devil and vortex detection parameters ............................................. 109 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1.1 Particle threshold curve ................................................................................. 4 1.2 Images of martian and terrestrial dust devils ................................................ 8 1.3 Forces on particle beneath passing vortex .................................................. 10 1.4 Rankine vortex model ................................................................................. 11 1.5 Map of spacecraft landing sites ................................................................... 13 1.6 Pressure, temperature, and wind vector perturbations ................................ 15 2.1 Schematic of Viking Lander detection instruments ................................... 23 2.2 Schematic of Mars Pathfinder Lander detection instruments .................... 25 2.3 Schematic of Mars Exploration Rover detection instruments .................... 28 2.4 Schematic of Phoenix Mars Lander detection instruments ........................ 29 2.5 Oribiter map of Viking Lander 1 site .......................................................... 32 2.6 Viking Lander 1 image of surrounding terrain ..........................................