DOCSLIB.ORG

The Proposed 'Environmentally Sustainable Level of Take'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Proposed 'Environmentally Sustainable Level of Take' The proposed ‘environmentally sustainable level of take’ for surface water of the Murray–Darling Basin: Method and outcomes November 2011 Published by the Murray–Darling Basin Authority © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia (Murray–Darling Basin Authority) 2011 MDBA publication no: 226/11 ISBN (print): 978-1-921914-88-1 ISBN (online): 978-1-921914-87-4 This report may be cited as: Murray‐Darling Basin Authority 2011, The proposed “environmentally sustainable level of take” for surface water of the Murray‐Darling Basin: Methods and outcomes, MDBA publication no: 226/11, Murray‐Darling Basin Authority, Canberra. © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 2011. This work is copyright. With the exception of the photographs, any logo or emblem, and any trademarks, the work may be stored, retrieved and reproduced in whole or in part, provided that it is not sold or used for commercial benefit. Any reproduction of information from this work must acknowledge the Murray–Darling Basin Authority, the Commonwealth of Australia or the relevant third party, as appropriate, as the owner of copyright in any selected material or information. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) or above, no part of this work may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Attorney General’s Department, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 or posted at http://www.ag.gov.au/cca. Disclaimer This document has been prepared by the Murray‐Darling Basin Authority for general use and to assist public knowledge and discussion regarding the integrated and sustainable management of the Basin’s natural water resources. The opinions, comments and analysis (including those of third parties) expressed in this document are for information purposes only. This document does not indicate the Murray‐Darling Basin Authority’s commitment to undertake or implement a particular course of action, and should not be relied upon in relation to any particular action or decision taken. Users should note that developments in Commonwealth policy, input from consultation and other circumstances may result in changes to the approaches set out in this document. Page i Foreword The Water Act 2007 established the Murray‐Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) and has tasked it with the preparation of a Basin Plan to provide for the integrated management of the Basin’s water resources. Central to the Basin Plan is the need to determine the Environmentally Sustainable Level of Take (ESLT). This report describes the method used by the Authority to determine the ESLT for surface water resources and describes the environmental objectives, ecological targets and environmental outcomes that can be achieved under the proposed ESLT. This report consists of: An executive summary providing an overview of the report; A description of the background and methods used to determine the ESLT and hence the Sustainable Diversion Limits (SDLs) (Sections 1‐8); An assessment of the environmental flow outcomes that may be achieved (Section 9); An assessment of the uncertainties and limitations in the method (Section 10); and A discussion of the adaptive management processes proposed from here to 2019 (Section 11). This is just one of the supporting documents associated with the proposed Basin Plan. Other documents provide further detail in key areas including: The report focusing on the process used to determine the ESLT and SDL for groundwater is The Groundwater SDL methodology for the Murray‐Darling Basin Plan (CSIRO and SKM 2010); A more detailed socio‐economic assessment can be found in the report titled Social and economic analyses and the draft Murray–Darling Basin Plan; A detailed description of the Environmental Watering Plan, which will guide actual decisions on environmental flow events, can be found at the MDBA website titled “Environmental Watering Plan: What’s in it and how it works”; a detailed modelling report (in preparation); environmental water requirement descriptions for indicator sites (in preparation); and a review of the science underpinning the ESLT (to be released during the 20 week consultation period). Page ii Executive summary The Murray‐Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) has a vision of a healthy working Basin that has vibrant communities, productive and resilient industries, and healthy and diverse ecosystems. One of the key actions to achieving a healthy working Basin is the need to ensure that there is balance between the water needs of communities, industries and the environment, while at the same time protecting and restoring the ecological and other values of water‐dependent ecosystems so they remain healthy. The Basin Plan aims to do this through the establishment of Long‐Term Average Sustainable Diversion Limits (SDLs), which come into effect in 2019, along with a range of other measures that will improve the management of water in the Basin. The SDLs are limits on the volumes of water that can be taken for human uses (including domestic, urban and agricultural use) and are set at both a catchment and Basin scale. The Water Act requires that these new limits are determined on the basis of an assessment of the Environmentally Sustainable Level of Take, or ESLT. This report provides a summary of the method used by MDBA to determine the ESLT for surface water resources and describes the environmental objectives, ecological targets and environmental outcomes that can be achieved under the proposed ESLT. The need for change For more than a hundred years, the infrastructure and management of the Murray‐Darling Basin has been developed to secure social and economic outcomes. Many rivers have been modified and become highly managed systems to supply drinking water to towns and cities, support agriculture, mitigate floods and droughts, and allow for irrigation. This development has supported one of the most productive food and fibre regions in Australia. However, there have been substantial environmental impacts that now undermine the very agricultural and community values that the Basin supports. These environmental impacts have long been recognised and the recent drought exposed the limits and weakness of how water is currently managed in the Basin. The Murray Mouth was only kept open by constant dredging. Wetlands and floodplains across the Basin from Queensland to South Australia all experienced widespread environmental degradation. Some irrigators received no water in some years, while towns and cities experienced harsh water restrictions. History of water reform The history of water reform in the Murray‐Darling Basin, in response to declining environmental health, is long and ongoing. The first steps are perhaps hard to single out, but it is clear that the decline in environmental condition contributed to the establishment of the Murray‐Darling Basin Initiative and Murray‐Darling Basin Commission in the 1980s. In 1994, the Council of Australian Governments adopted a strategic water reform framework. The main objectives were to establish an efficient and sustainable water industry, and to stop widespread natural resource degradation partly caused by consumptive water use. The Council of Page iii Australian Governments reinforced and extended these strategic water reforms in 2004 through the Intergovernmental Agreement on a National Water Initiative. As the reforms have been implemented, a growing body of evidence has accumulated indicating that the water resources of the Basin are being overextended, while the ecological health of the Basin is under increasing stress and is degrading. This includes the decline of wetlands with associated loss of vegetation and collapse of waterbird breeding. Initial steps to limit extractions were taken in 1995 with the Commonwealth and Basin states agreeing to cap surface‐water extractions in the Basin generally at 1993–94 levels of use (the Cap). In 2002, in response to evidence showing the declining health of the River Murray system, governments established The Living Murray initiative. Supported by scientific assessment of environmental water requirements, the governments agreed to recover an average of 500 GL per year as a ‘first step’ towards securing the long‐term ecological health of six icon sites, and agreed to concurrently invest in infrastructure to make the best use of the water available to the environment and achieve other ecological outcomes, including fish passage. In response to extreme drought, exacerbated environmental stress across the Basin, and growing evidence that further action was needed to address environmental decline, the Australian Parliament passed the Water Act 2007 (Cwlth). The Water Act established the MDBA with the powers necessary to develop and implement new Basin‐wide water planning and management arrangements, including legally enforceable limits on the amount of water that can be taken for consumptive use. Requirements of the Water Act A key component of the Basin Plan is to provide for the establishment and enforcement of environmentally sustainable limits on the quantities of surface water and groundwater that can be taken from Basin water resources. The Act provides objects, context, definitions and other directions to guide the determination of these limits. Whilst the Water Act provides overarching objects and requirements, it does not prescribe specific environmental targets or outcomes (such as a level of protection or
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Native Title in the News – November & December 2000
    We are busily completing the final production of the proceedings from last year’s Native Title Representative Bodies Legal Conference, held in Melbourne in April 2000. Bryan Keon-Cohen QC has been working furiously to edit the papers, a selection of which will be published in the book with a great deal of additional material to be included on an accompanying CD. The result will be an exciting and very important publication. So, look out for Native Title in the New Millennium. Hot on the heels of the proceedings we are working on the next NTRB Legal Conference which will be a celebration of the 20 year Anniversary of the Townsville conference that initiated the Mabo litigation. The conference will be held in Townsville on the 28-30 August 2001. We will keep you posted on developments with the organisation of the event. NATIVE TITLE IN THE NEWS – NOVEMBER & DECEMBER 2000 New South Wales Land holders and other interest holders affected by the Muthi Muthi native title application over 23,829 square kilometres in south western New South Wales have been invited by the National Native Title Tribunal to register for mediation talks. The application covers land in Balranald Shire bounded by Euston, the Murray and Edward Rivers to Moolpa, Maude, Booligal, Willandra Creek and Mungo National Park and excludes private freehold land. (NNTT Media Release, 13 Dec) The National Native Title Tribunal has advertised five native title applications in western New South Wales inviting interest holders to register as parties to the mediation proceedings. The applications in the Balranald, Bourke, Broken Hill, Central Darling, Cobar, Wentworth and Unincorporated Area do not cover any private freehold land.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: General Introduction
    Chapter 1: General introduction Chapter 1: General Introduction 1.1 Introduction The biogeochemical cycling of key elements within ecosystems is comprised of a complex array of abiotic and biotic processes. The stoichiometry or the mass-balance of elements is a measure of their total mass present within an ecosystem. Ecological stoichiometry theory recognizes that the ratio of ecosystem elements controls the rates of the biotic ecological processes which recycle these elements (Sterner & Elser 2002, Cross et al. 2005). However, the rates at which these ecological processes occur can also be influenced by many other abiotic parameters and processes. At the basal level of aquatic systems, autotrophic and heterotrophic communities are responsible for some of the main biotic processes that control the cycling of the key ecosystem elements, carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) (Sterner & Elser 2002, Cross et al. 2005). Photosynthesis is the dominant process that produces carbon, while autotrophic respiration or the heterotrophic decomposition of organic matter are the main pathways for carbon utilisation in aquatic systems. As both of these processes require N and P, the concentrations at which they are available to consumers will control the rate at which these elements are retained and recycled within the system (Sterner & Elser 2002, Cross et al. 2005). In lotic systems, the cycling of key elements is also controlled through abiotic ecosystem processes and their interaction with biotic processes (Brookes et al. 2005). The main abiotic factors that can affect the biotic process of autotrophic production in streams are light (Bunn et al. 1999, Bott et al. 2006), substrate (Cardinale et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Ken Hill and Darling River Action Group Inc and the Broken Hill Menindee Lakes We Want Action Facebook Group
    R. A .G TO THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MURRAY DARLING BASIN ROYAL COMMISSION SUBMISSION BY: The Broken Hill and Darling River Action Group Inc and the Broken Hill Menindee Lakes We Want Action Facebook Group. With the permission of the Executive and Members of these Groups. Prepared by: Mark Hutton on behalf of the Broken Hill and Darling River Action Group Inc and the Broken Hill Menindee Lakes We Want Action Facebook Group. Chairman of the Broken Hill and Darling River Action Group and Co Administrator of the Broken Hill Menindee Lakes We Want Action Facebook Group Mark Hutton NSW Date: 20/04/2018 Index The Effect The Cause The New Broken Hill to Wentworth Water Supply Pipeline Environmental health Floodplain Harvesting The current state of the Darling River 2007 state of the Darling Report Water account 2008/2009 – Murray Darling Basin Plan The effect on our communities The effect on our environment The effect on Indigenous Tribes of the Darling Background Our Proposal Climate Change and Irrigation Extractions – Reduced Flow Suggestions for Improvements Conclusion References (Fig 1) The Darling River How the Darling River and Menindee Lakes affect the Plan and South Australia The Effect The flows along the Darling River and into the Menindee Lakes has a marked effect on the amount of water that flows into the Lower Murray and South Australia annually. Alought the percentage may seem small as an average (Approx. 17% per annum) large flows have at times contributed markedly in times when the Lower Murray River had periods of low or no flow. This was especially evident during the Millennium Drought when a large flow was shepherded through to the Lower Lakes and Coorong thereby averting what would have been a natural disaster and the possibility of Adelaide running out of water.
    [Show full text]
  • Industry & Investment NSW – Fisheries Research Report Series
    Industry & Investment NSW – Fisheries Research Report Series: 28 Lower Murray-Darling Catchment Action Plan: Fish Community Monitoring Report Card for 2009/10 by Dean Gilligan November 2010 ISSN 1837-2120 Industry & Investment NSW – Fisheries Research Report Series This series presents scientific and technical information on general fisheries research and the documents in the series are intended to be progress reports on ongoing investigations. Titles in this series may be cited as publications, with the correct citation on the front cover. Fisheries Research in New South Wales Fisheries research activities in the NSW Department of Primary Industries are based at various centres throughout the state. The studies conducted cover commercial and recreational fisheries and aquaculture, and conservation issues in coastal and riverine areas. The major role of the research is to provide information upon which relevant fisheries management policies and strategies are developed, monitored and assessed in terms of the Department’s obligations under the NSW Fisheries Management Act, 1994. Title: Lower Murray-Darling Catchment Action Plan: Fish Community Monitoring Report Card for 2009/10 Authors: Dean Gilligan Published By: Industry & Investment NSW (now incorporating NSW Department of Primary Industries) Postal Address: PO Box 21, Cronulla, NSW, 2230 Internet: www.dpi.nsw.gov.au © Industry & Investment NSW (Industry & Investment NSW) This work is copyright. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part of this reproduction may be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owners. Neither may information be stored electronically in any form whatsoever without such permission. DISCLAIMER The publishers do not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Gazette of the STATE of NEW SOUTH WALES Number 112 Monday, 3 September 2007 Published Under Authority by Government Advertising
    6835 Government Gazette OF THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES Number 112 Monday, 3 September 2007 Published under authority by Government Advertising SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT EXOTIC DISEASES OF ANIMALS ACT 1991 ORDER - Section 15 Declaration of Restricted Areas – Hunter Valley and Tamworth I, IAN JAMES ROTH, Deputy Chief Veterinary Offi cer, with the powers the Minister has delegated to me under section 67 of the Exotic Diseases of Animals Act 1991 (“the Act”) and pursuant to section 15 of the Act: 1. revoke each of the orders declared under section 15 of the Act that are listed in Schedule 1 below (“the Orders”); 2. declare the area specifi ed in Schedule 2 to be a restricted area; and 3. declare that the classes of animals, animal products, fodder, fi ttings or vehicles to which this order applies are those described in Schedule 3. SCHEDULE 1 Title of Order Date of Order Declaration of Restricted Area – Moonbi 27 August 2007 Declaration of Restricted Area – Woonooka Road Moonbi 29 August 2007 Declaration of Restricted Area – Anambah 29 August 2007 Declaration of Restricted Area – Muswellbrook 29 August 2007 Declaration of Restricted Area – Aberdeen 29 August 2007 Declaration of Restricted Area – East Maitland 29 August 2007 Declaration of Restricted Area – Timbumburi 29 August 2007 Declaration of Restricted Area – McCullys Gap 30 August 2007 Declaration of Restricted Area – Bunnan 31 August 2007 Declaration of Restricted Area - Gloucester 31 August 2007 Declaration of Restricted Area – Eagleton 29 August 2007 SCHEDULE 2 The area shown in the map below and within the local government areas administered by the following councils: Cessnock City Council Dungog Shire Council Gloucester Shire Council Great Lakes Council Liverpool Plains Shire Council 6836 SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT 3 September 2007 Maitland City Council Muswellbrook Shire Council Newcastle City Council Port Stephens Council Singleton Shire Council Tamworth City Council Upper Hunter Shire Council NEW SOUTH WALES GOVERNMENT GAZETTE No.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Water Management Plan for the Murray River from Lock 6 – Lock 10
    Environmental Water Management Plan for the Murray River from Lock 6 – Lock 10 Environmental Water Management Plan for the Murray River from Lock 6 to Lock 10 Environmental Water Management Plan for the Murray River from Lock 6 – Lock 10 DOCUMENT CONTROL Revision and Distribution Version no. Description Issued to Issue date Environmental Water Management 1 Plan for the Murray River from Lock 6 Jane White 9 January 2015 to Lock 10 - System Characterisation 2 Review Simone Wilkie, Riverness 27 April 2015 3 Final Draft Jane White 30 April 2015 Citation Ecological Associates (2015). Environmental Water Management Plan for the Murray River from Lock 6 to Lock 10 - System Characterisation. Ecological Associates report AL043-1-A prepared for Mallee Catchment Management Authority, Irymple. Contact For queries regarding this document, please contact: Louise Chapman [email protected] Waterways Coordinator Mallee Catchment Management Authority This publication may be of assistance to you but the Mallee Catchment Management Authority and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purpose and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence that may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Environmental Water Management Plan for the Murray River from Lock 6 – Lock 10 Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................i
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to NSW Government On: Gwydir Surface Water Resource Plan Area (SW15) By: Gwydir Valley Irrigators Association Inc
    Submission to NSW Government on: Gwydir Surface Water Resource Plan Area (SW15) By: Gwydir Valley Irrigators Association Inc November 2018 Table of Contents 1 Summary and Purpose .................................................................................................. 3 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 3 About the GVIA .............................................................................................................. 4 3.1 Our region ............................................................................................................... 4 3.2 What we do ............................................................................................................. 7 3.3 Contacts ................................................................................................................. 7 4 General Comments ........................................................................................................ 8 4.1 Water resource plan development .......................................................................... 8 4.2 Water sharing plan reviews ..................................................................................... 9 4.3 The water resource plan package ......................................................................... 10 4.3.1 Water sharing plan ......................................................................................... 10 4.3.2 Connectivity in the Gwydir.............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Letter with Full Covering Brief
    New South Wales Water Sharing Plan for the Gwydir Unregulated and Alluvial Water Sources Amendment Order 2016 under the Water Management Act 2000 I, Niall Blair, the Minister for Lands and Water, in pursuance of sections 45 (1) (a) and 45A of the Water Management Act 2000, being satisfied it is in the public interest to do so, make the following Order to amend the Water Sharing Plan for the Gwydir Unregulated and Alluvial Water Sources 2012. Dated this 29th day of June 2016. NIALL BLAIR, MLC Minister for Lands and Water Explanatory note This Order is made under sections 45 (1) (a) and 45A of the Water Management Act 2000. The object of this Order is to amend the Water Sharing Plan for the Gwydir Unregulated and Alluvial Water Sources 2012. The concurrence of the Minister for the Environment was obtained prior to the making of this Order. 1 Published LW 1 July 2016 (2016 No 372) Water Sharing Plan for the Gwydir Unregulated and Alluvial Water Sources Amendment Order 2016 Water Sharing Plan for the Gwydir Unregulated and Alluvial Water Sources Amendment Order 2016 under the Water Management Act 2000 1 Name of Order This Order is the Water Sharing Plan for the Gwydir Unregulated and Alluvial Water Sources Amendment Order 2016. 2 Commencement This Order commences on the day on which it is published on the NSW legislation website. 2 Published LW 1 July 2016 (2016 No 372) Water Sharing Plan for the Gwydir Unregulated and Alluvial Water Sources Amendment Order 2016 Schedule 1 Amendment of Water Sharing Plan for the Gwydir Unregulated and Alluvial Water Sources 2012 [1] Clause 4 Application of this Plan Omit “and” from clause 4 (1) (a) (xxvi).
    [Show full text]
  • Water Sharing Plan for the Gwydir Unregulated and Alluvial Water Sources Amendment Order 2020 Under The
    Water Sharing Plan for the Gwydir Unregulated and Alluvial Water Sources Amendment Order 2020 under the Water Management Act 2000 I, Melinda Pavey, Minister for Water, Property and Housing, in pursuance of section 45 (1) of the Water Management Act 2000, make the following Order to amend the Water Sharing Plan for the Gwydir Unregulated and Alluvial Water Sources 2012. Dated 29th June 2020 MELINDA PAVEY, MP Minister for Water, Property and Housing Explanatory note This Order is made under sections 45 (1) of the Water Management Act 2000. The object of the Order is to amend the Water Sharing Plan for the Gwydir Unregulated and Alluvial Water Sources 2012. The concurrence of the Minister for Energy and Environment was obtained prior to the making of this Order as required under section 45 of the Water Management Act 2000. Published LW 1 July 2020 (2020 No 357) Water Sharing Plan for the Gwydir Unregulated and Alluvial Water Sources Amendment Order 2020 under the Water Management Act 2000 1 Name of Order This Order is the Water Sharing Plan for the Gwydir Unregulated and Alluvial Water Sources Amendment Order 2020. 2 Commencement This Order commences on 1 July 2020. Published LW 1 July 2020 (2020 No 357) Schedule 1 Amendment of Water Sharing Plan for the Gwydir Unregulated and Alluvial Water Sources 2012 [1] Part 1 Introduction Omit the note. Insert instead: Notes. 1 Part 12 allows for amendments to be made to Part 1. 2 In accordance with section 48 of the Water Management Act 2000, the Minister must take all reasonable steps to give effect to the provisions of this Plan when exercising functions under the Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Benefits of Increased Irrigation Efficiency in the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area
    ABARE CONFERENCE PAPER 2001.10 Benefits of increased irrigation efficiency in the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area Adrian Kemp and Ahmed Hafi Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics 45th Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, Adelaide, 22–25 January 2001 Limited water availability in the face of increasing competing demands for water, including water for environmental purposes, has highlighted the need to make the most efficient use of the available water in the Murray Darling Basin. This study focuses on the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area (MIA) and consid- ers the benefits of increasing irrigation efficiency. A model of the MIA which incorporates both on and off farm components is used to evaluate the bene- fits of adopting two on-farm options — twin furrow irrigation for horticul- tural farms and water reuse systems for horticulture and broadacre farms. The study found these on-farm water saving options can be profitably adopted leading to savings of river diversions of up to 27 GL a year. ABARE project 1629 1 ABARE CONFERENCE PAPER 2001.10 Introduction In recent seasons, reduced availability of irrigation water, increased water demand in agriculture and for other purposes, and the high cost of investment in new dams and associated infrastructure in the southern Murray Darling Basin (MDB), have highlighted the need to make the most efficient use of existing water resources. Improving on-farm irrigation and water use efficiency is likely to lead to a range of benefits including maintaining or increasing production from existing or less amounts of water; expanding irrigated areas; and reducing river diversions.
    [Show full text]
  • Gemstones and Geosciences in Space and Time Digital Maps to the “Chessboard Classification Scheme of Mineral Deposits”
    Earth-Science Reviews 127 (2013) 262–299 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth-Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Gemstones and geosciences in space and time Digital maps to the “Chessboard classification scheme of mineral deposits” Harald G. Dill a,b,⁎,BertholdWeberc,1 a Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources, P.O. Box 510163, D-30631 Hannover, Germany b Institute of Geosciences — Gem-Materials Research and Economic Geology, Johannes-Gutenberg-University, Becherweg 21, D-55099 Mainz, Germany c Bürgermeister-Knorr Str. 8, D-92637 Weiden i.d.OPf., Germany article info abstract Article history: The gemstones, covering the spectrum from jeweler's to showcase quality, have been presented in a tripartite Received 27 April 2012 subdivision, by country, geology and geomorphology realized in 99 digital maps with more than 2600 mineral- Accepted 16 July 2013 ized sites. The various maps were designed based on the “Chessboard classification scheme of mineral deposits” Available online 25 July 2013 proposed by Dill (2010a, 2010b) to reveal the interrelations between gemstone deposits and mineral deposits of other commodities and direct our thoughts to potential new target areas for exploration. A number of 33 categories Keywords: were used for these digital maps: chromium, nickel, titanium, iron, manganese, copper, tin–tungsten, beryllium, Gemstones fl Country lithium, zinc, calcium, boron, uorine, strontium, phosphorus, zirconium, silica, feldspar, feldspathoids, zeolite, Geology amphibole (tiger's eye), olivine, pyroxenoid, garnet, epidote, sillimanite–andalusite, corundum–spinel−diaspore, Geomorphology diamond, vermiculite–pagodite, prehnite, sepiolite, jet, and amber. Besides the political base map (gems Digital maps by country) the mineral deposit is drawn on a geological map, illustrating the main lithologies, stratigraphic Chessboard classification scheme units and tectonic structure to unravel the evolution of primary gemstone deposits in time and space.
    [Show full text]
  • River Murray Water Resources Report
    River Murray Water Resources Report Issue 52: 3 February 2010 Observations at a glance River Murray system inflows have continued at low levels, with only 110 GL received during January 2010. This was well below the long-term January average of 235 GL. Irrigators are currently able to access 48% of their entitlement. Applications to carry-over water not used in 2009-10 for use in 2010-11 are now open, and must be lodged on or before 19 March 2010. The volume of water in upstream storages is currently 2,418 GL (26% capacity), compared to 1,770 GL (19% capacity) at the same time last year. Murray-Darling Basin storages The volume of water in storage in Hume and Dartmouth Reservoirs, Lake Victoria and Menindee Lakes is currently 2,418 GL (26% capacity), compared to 1,770 GL (19% capacity) at the same time last year. Current storage levels are shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Murray-Darling Basin storages River Murray Water Resources Report Issue 52: 3 February 2010 Of the above volume, the amount of water currently held within the main Murray-Darling Basin Authority-operated storages (Hume, Dartmouth and Lake Victoria) is currently 2,080 GL or 27% capacity. The volume of water held in Menindee Lakes has been increasing due to improved flows along the Darling River and is currently 338 GL or 20% capacity. Releases will continue from Hume and Dartmouth Reservoirs over the coming months to assist in supplying downstream requirements, including irrigation diversions. Rainfall and River Murray inflows Southern Murray-Darling Basin River Murray system inflows have continued at low levels.
    [Show full text]