Synopsis of Biological Data on the Grunts Haemulon Aurolineatum and H

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Synopsis of Biological Data on the Grunts Haemulon Aurolineatum and H NOAA Technical Report NMFS Circular 448 Synopsis of Biological Data on the G ru nts Haemulon aurolineatum and H. plumieri (Pisces: Haemulidae) George H. Darcy February 1983 FAO Fisheries Synopsis No. 133 u.s. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration John V. Byrne, Administrator National Marine Fisheries Service William G. Gordon, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) does not approve, rec­ ommend or endorse any proprietary product or proprietary material mentioned in this publication. No reference shall be made to NMFS, or to this publication furnished by NMFS, in any advertising or sales pro­ motion which would indicate or imply that N;\IFS approves, recommends or endorses any proprietary product or proprietary material mentioned herein, or which has as its purpose an intent to cause directly or indirectly the advertised product to be used or purchased because of this NMFS publication. CONTENTS Introduction ........... .. .... .... ...... .............................................. ......... 1 Identity .... ........ .. ....... ... ....... ... .......... ... ................................... ...... 1. 1 Nomenclature .......... .. ..... .. .. ... .. ..... ........ .. ... .......................... 1. 11 Valid name . : . .. .................................... ................................... 1. 12 Objective synonymy. .. I 1 .2 Ta xonomy . .. 3 1.21 Affinities . ................ ... ................................... .. ....................... ..... 3 1.22 Taxonomic status .. .. 3 1.23 Subspecies. .. 4 1.24 Standard common names, vernac ul ar names. .. 4 1. 3 Morphology . .. 4 1.3 1 External morphology . .. 4 * 1.32 Cytomorphology 1.33 Protein specificity. .. 5 2 Distribution . .. 5 2. 1 Total area. .. 5 2.2 Differential distribution . .. 6 2.21 Spawn, larvae and juvenil es . .. 6 2.22 Adults. .. 7 2.3 Determinants of di stribution changes. .. 7 2.4 Hybridization. .. 8 3 Bionomics and life hi story .. ........ .. .. ... ..................................................... 8 3. 1 Reproducti on . .. 8 3. 11 Sexuality. .. .. .. 8 3. 12 Maturity .. ........... .. .. ................. .................................................. 8 3. 13 Mating. .. .. 9 3. 14 Fertilization. ... 9 3. 15 Gonads ..................................................... .. ...... ...... .. ................. 9 3. 16Spawning .......................................... .... .... .. .... ..... ..... ..................... 9 3.17 Spawn ....................................................... .. ...... ... ...................... II 3.2 Preadult phase ....................... .. ................................. ............................ 11 3.21 Embryonic phase .................... .. ......................... ... ... ............. .. ........... 11 3.22 Larvae and adolescent phase . .......... .. ... 11 3.3 Adult phase .................................. ..... ......... .............. ....... ... ... ............. 17 3.3 1 Longevity ... .... .. .. ..... ............................................................. ..... 17 3.32 Hardiness ..... ......... ... ................................................................... 17 3.33 Competitors .. ........................................ ..... .......... ........................... 19 3 .34 Predators .................................... ................... ..... ...... ... .............. 19 3.35 Parasites, diseases, inj ulies, and abnormal ities .................... .. ................................... 19 3.36 Chemical composi ti on . 19 3.4 Nutrition and growth ..... .. ... .. 19 3.4 1 Feeding . ... .. ... .. .. ... .. ....... .. ... .... ... .. ... ...... 19 3 .42 Food . .... .. .... .. ... .. ... .. ... ... .. .. ........ .. .. ... .... .... .... .. 19 3.43 Growth rate. .. ......... ... ....................................................... 20 *3 .44 Metabolism 3.5 Behav ior . .. .... .... 23 3.5 1 Migrations and local movements. 23 3.52 Schooling .. .... ............... .. ....... ........... .... .......... ........................... 2-+ *3.53 Responses to stimuli 4 Population . .. 24 4.1 Structure . .. 24 4 .11 Sex ratio ....... .. 24 4 . 12 Age composition ............ ... ... ....... ... .................................................... 24 4.13 Size composition . .. ........... 25 4.14 Subpopulations .............. ........................................... .... .. .. .. .............. 26 4 .2 Abundance and density ...... ........................................... ............................ 26 4 .3 Natality and recruitment. ........ ..... ........................................... .................... 28 4 .31 Reproduction rates . ............................................ ... ....... ........................ 28 4.32 Factors affecting reproduction. 28 4 .33 Recruitment. .. .. 28 o 3.4 em Figure I.-Adult Haemulon aurolineatum. (From Courtenay and Sahlman 1978.) o 6.0 em Fi~ure 2.-Adult Haemulon piumieri. (From Courtenay and Sahlman 1978.) 1.2 Taxonomy Specific 1.21 Affinities Haemulon aurolineatum Suprageneric The following species diagnosis is from Courtena. (1961): POR'lI lateral line scales 50-52; caudal peduncle scales 22 (9-2-11): dor..al Phylum Chordata fin XII + I, 14-15, usually 15 ; anal fill III, 9, rarely 8. pectoral tIll Class Osteichthyes 17-18, usually 17 ; gill rakers 24-28; longitudmal scale fO\l. belov. Superorder Acanthopterygii lateral line parallel to long axis of body; body slivery-white With Order Perciformes yellow to brown stripe from behind preopercle to black blotch at Suborder Percoidei base of caudal fill; pectoral fillS chalky; other flns pale grd) to Family Haemulidae chalky; juveniles with lateral stripe from belund eye to caudal peduncle continuous with oval spot when young. eparate from Systematics and distribution of the family Haemulidae were dumbbell-shaped spot in larger individuals. reveiwed by Konchina (1976), who listed several previously recog­ Adults of H. aurolineatum are easily separated from most other nized families (Gaterinidae, Pomadasidae, Prisinpomidae, Plec­ species of Haemulon because they possess 13 dorsal spines. Other torhinchidae, and Xenichthyidae) now included in Haemulidae. Haemulon species, except for H. striatum and H. boschmae. have Although recent usage has favored the family name Pomadasyidae, 12 dorsal spines. The three species having 13 spines may be distin­ Haemulidae is an earlier name which should be applied (Robins et guished as shown in Table 1. al . 1980) . Generic Table I.-Distinguishing characters of three species of Haemulon from the western Atlantic. (From Courtena} and Sahlman 1978.) Several workers have reviewed the genus Haemulon, sensu lato. Jordan and Swain (1884) discussed the status ofthe genus and con­ Character H. aurolineatum H. slriaIum H ho.\chmo( cluded that Bathystoma of Scudder (1863 as cited in Jordan and Scales around caudal Swain 1884), in which the species aurolineatum is sometimes peduncle 22 25-26 2327 placed, should not be regarded as a distinct genus. Jordan and Scale rows below parallel to obltque most I) PJrJllel Fesler (1893) likewise did not recognize Bathystoma, but placed lateral line body axis to bod} a " Gill rakers in Haemulon along with lutjanids in the family Sparidae. Ginsburg first arch 24-28 28-34 30 "If> (1948) reviewed the species of Bathystoma, a genus which he con­ Anal fin rays 9 7-8 7-"1 sidered distinct based on a difference in number of dorsal spines (usuall) XI (Bathystoma having 13 and Haemulon, sensu stricto, having 12). Body shape compressed. nor compre~~ed . Lomprc.."cd depth 211 ,() Arnov (1952) excluded Bathystoma from his review of Haemulon. depth 32-36% depth 26-30 '1' SL SL SL Most recent authors (Courtenay 1961 ; Konchina 1976; Courtenay and Sahlman 1978) have considered Bathystoma to be a synonym of Haemulon. Haemulor, plumieri Courtenay (1961) listed synunyms of Haemulon Cuvier: The following species diagnosis is from Courtenay (1961): pored Diabasis Desmarest, 1823 (preoccupied in Coleoptera) lateral line scales 48-51, usually 50-51; caudal peduncle scales 22 Haemulon Cuvier, 1829 (9-2-11); dorsal fill XI + I , 15-17, usually 16; anal.
Recommended publications
  • Diagramma Pictum (Thunberg. 1792)
    Diagramma pictum (Thunberg. 1792) English Name: Painted sweetlips Family: HAEMULIDAE Local Name: Kilanbu guruva Order: Perciformes Size: Max. 90 cm Specimen: MRS/P048 1/97 Distinctive Characters: Dorsal fin with 9-10 spines and 17-20 rays. Anal fin with 3 spines and 7 rays. Pectoral fin with 16-17 rays. Second dorsal spine much longer than the first. 20 to 25 scales between lateral line and dorsal fin origin. Scales small and ctenoid. Mouth small, lips thick. Colour: Adults light grey with scattered large blackish blotches on sides, white on belly. Juveniles with conspicuous alternating black and white stripes, and yellowish on headand belly. Stripes eventually break up into spots that disappear in adults. Habitat and Biology: Found on shallow coastal areas and coral reefs down to a depth of 80 rn. Most common on silty areas. Feeds on bottom invertebrates and fish. Distribution: Indo-West Pacific. Remarks: Di gramma picluni can easily be distinguished from other sweetlips by its short. first dorsal spine and second (with the third) abruptly the longest. 172 Plectorhinchus albovittatus (Ruppell, 1838) English Name: Giant sweetlips Family: HAEMULIDAE Local Name: Maa guruva Order: Perciformes Size: Max. 1 m Specimen: MRS/P030l/88 Distinctive Characters: Dorsal fin with 13 spines and 18-19 rays. Anal fin with 3 spines and 7 rays. Pectoral fin 17 rays. Lips greatly enlarged. Caudal fin slightly emarginate. Colour: Adults dark grey with numerous pale spots and short irregular lines. Usually a broad diffused pale bar just behind pectoral fins, extending onto abdomen. Soft portion of dorsal fin and lobes of caudal fin with large black areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Assemblage of the Mamanguape Environmental Protection Area, NE Brazil: Abundance, Composition and Microhabitat Availability Along the Mangrove-Reef Gradient
    Neotropical Ichthyology, 10(1): 109-122, 2012 Copyright © 2012 Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia Fish assemblage of the Mamanguape Environmental Protection Area, NE Brazil: abundance, composition and microhabitat availability along the mangrove-reef gradient Josias Henrique de Amorim Xavier1, Cesar Augusto Marcelino Mendes Cordeiro2, Gabrielle Dantas Tenório1, Aline de Farias Diniz1, Eugenio Pacelli Nunes Paulo Júnior1, Ricardo S. Rosa1 and Ierecê Lucena Rosa1 Reefs, mangroves and seagrass biotopes often occur in close association, forming a complex and highly productive ecosystem that provide significant ecologic and economic goods and services. Different anthropogenic disturbances are increasingly affecting these tropical coastal habitats leading to growing conservation concern. In this field-based study, we used a visual census technique (belt transects 50 m x 2 m) to investigate the interactions between fishes and microhabitats at the Mamanguape Mangrove-Reef system, NE Brazil. Overall, 144 belt transects were performed from October 2007 to September 2008 to assess the structure of the fish assemblage. Fish trophic groups and life stage (juveniles and adults) were recorded according to literature, the percent cover of the substrate was estimated using the point contact method. Our results revealed that fish composition gradually changed from the Estuarine to the Reef zone, and that fish assemblage was strongly related to the microhabitat availability, as suggested by the predominance of carnivores at the Estuarine zone and presence of herbivores at the Reef zone. Fish abundance and diversity were higher in the Reef zone and estuary margins, highlighting the importance of structural complexity. A pattern of nursery area utilization, with larger specimens at the Transition and Reef Zone and smaller individuals at the Estuarine zone, was recorded for Abudefduf saxatilis, Anisotremus surinamensis, Lutjanus alexandrei, and Lutjanus jocu.
    [Show full text]
  • (<I>Anisotremus Virginicus,</I> Haemulidae) And
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 34(1): 21-59,1984 DESCRIPTION OF PORKFISH LARVAE (ANISOTREMUS VIRGINICUS, HAEMULIDAE) AND THEIR OSTEOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT Thomas Potthoff, Sharon Kelley, Martin Moe and Forrest Young ABSTRACT Wild-caught adult porkfish (Anisotremus virginicus, Haemulidae) were spawned in the laboratory and their larvae reared. A series of 35 larvae 2.4 mm NL to 21.5 mm SL from 2 to 30 days old or older (larvae of unknown age) was studied for pigmentation characteristics. Cleared and stained specimens were examined for meristic and osteological development. Cartilaginous neural and haemal arches develop first anteriorly, at the center, and posteriorly, above and below the notochord, but ossification of the vertebral column is from anterior in a posterior direction. Epipleural rib pairs develop from bone, but pleural rib pairs develop from cartilage first and then ossify. The second dorsal, anal and caudal fins develop rays first and simultaneously, followed by first dorsal fin spine development. The pectoral and pelvic fins are the last of all fins to develop rays. All bones basic to a perciform pectoral girdle develop with cartilaginous radials present between the pectoral fin ray bases. Development and structure of pre dorsal bones and dorsal and anal fin pterygiophores were studied. All bones basic to a perciform caudal complex developed and no fusion of any of these bones was observed in the adults. Radial cartilages developed ventrad in the hypural complex. The hyoid arches originated from cartilage but the branchiostegal rays formed from bone. The development and anatomy of the branchial skeleton were studied. Spines develop on the four bones of the opercular series in larvae and juveniles but are absent in the adults.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversidade Funcional Da Ictiofauna Da Zona De Arrebentação De Jaguaribe (...)
    FAVERO, FLT. Diversidade funcional da ictiofauna da zona de arrebentação de Jaguaribe (...) UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL RURAL DE PERNAMBUCO PRÓ-REITORIA DE PESQUISA E PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM RECURSOS PESQUEIROS E AQUICULTURA DIVERSIDADE FUNCIONAL DA ICTIOFAUNA DA ZONA DE ARREBENTAÇÃO DE JAGUARIBE, ITAMARACÁ, LITORAL NORTE DE PERNAMBUCO Fernanda de Lima Toledo Favero Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Recursos Pesqueiros e Aquicultura da Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, como exigência para obtenção do título de Mestre. Prof. Dr. WILLIAM SEVERI Orientador Recife, Agosto/ 2019 FAVERO, FLT. Diversidade funcional da ictiofauna da zona de arrebentação de Jaguaribe (...) 2 Dados Internacionais de Catalogação na Publicação (CIP) Sistema Integrado de Bibliotecas da UFRPE Biblioteca Central, Recife-PE, Brasil F273d Favero, Fernanda de Lima Toledo. Diversidade funcional da ictiofauna da zona de arrebentação de Jaguaribe, Itamaracá, litoral norte de Pernambuco / Fernanda de Lima Toledo Favero. – Recife, 2019. 66 f.: il. Orientador(a): William Severi. Dissertação (Mestrado) – Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Recursos Pesqueiros e Aquicultura, Recife, BR-PE, 2019. Inclui referências. 1. Guildas funcionais 2. Ecomorfologia 3. Índices de diversidade funcional I. Severi, William, orient. II. Título. CDD 639.3 FAVERO, FLT. Diversidade funcional da ictiofauna da zona de arrebentação de Jaguaribe (...) 3 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL RURAL DE PERNAMBUCO PRÓ-REITORIA DE PESQUISA E PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM RECURSOS PESQUEIROS E AQÜICULTURA DIVERSIDADE FUNCIONAL DA ICTIOFAUNA DA ZONA DE ARREBENTAÇÃO DE JAGUARIBE, ITAMARACÁ, LITORAL NORTE DE PERNAMBUCO Fernanda de Lima Toledo Favero Dissertação julgada adequada para obtenção do título de mestre em Recursos Pesqueiros e Aquicultura.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological and Karyotypic Differentiation in Caranx Lugubris (Perciformes: Carangidae) in the St. Peter and St. Paul Archipelago, Mid-Atlantic Ridge
    Helgol Mar Res (2014) 68:17–25 DOI 10.1007/s10152-013-0365-0 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Morphological and karyotypic differentiation in Caranx lugubris (Perciformes: Carangidae) in the St. Peter and St. Paul Archipelago, mid-Atlantic Ridge Uedson Pereira Jacobina • Pablo Ariel Martinez • Marcelo de Bello Cioffi • Jose´ Garcia Jr. • Luiz Antonio Carlos Bertollo • Wagner Franco Molina Received: 21 December 2012 / Revised: 16 June 2013 / Accepted: 5 July 2013 / Published online: 24 July 2013 Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and AWI 2013 Abstract Isolated oceanic islands constitute interesting Introduction model systems for the study of colonization processes, as several climatic and oceanographic phenomena have played Ichthyofauna on the St. Peter and St. Paul Archipelago an important role in the history of the marine ichthyofauna. (SPSPA) is of great biological interest, due to its degree The present study describes the presence of two morpho- of geographic isolation. The region is a remote point, far types of Caranx lugubris, in the St. Peter and St. Paul from the South American (&1,100 km) and African Archipelago located in the mid-Atlantic. Morphotypes were (&1,824 km) continents, with a high level of endemic fish compared in regard to their morphological and cytogenetic species (Edwards and Lubbock 1983). This small archi- patterns, using C-banding, Ag-NORs, staining with CMA3/ pelago is made up of four larger islands (Belmonte, St. DAPI fluorochromes and chromosome mapping by dual- Paul, St. Peter and Bara˜o de Teffe´), in addition to 11 color FISH analysis with 5S rDNA and 18S rDNA probes. smaller rocky points. The combined action of the South We found differences in chromosome patterns and marked Equatorial Current and Pacific Equatorial Undercurrent divergence in body patterns which suggest that different provides a highly complex hydrological pattern that sig- populations of the Atlantic or other provinces can be found nificantly influences the insular ecosystem (Becker 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Sharkcam Fishes
    SharkCam Fishes A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower By Erin J. Burge, Christopher E. O’Brien, and jon-newbie 1 Table of Contents Identification Images Species Profiles Additional Info Index Trevor Mendelow, designer of SharkCam, on August 31, 2014, the day of the original SharkCam installation. SharkCam Fishes. A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower. 5th edition by Erin J. Burge, Christopher E. O’Brien, and jon-newbie is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. For questions related to this guide or its usage contact Erin Burge. The suggested citation for this guide is: Burge EJ, CE O’Brien and jon-newbie. 2020. SharkCam Fishes. A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower. 5th edition. Los Angeles: Explore.org Ocean Frontiers. 201 pp. Available online http://explore.org/live-cams/player/shark-cam. Guide version 5.0. 24 February 2020. 2 Table of Contents Identification Images Species Profiles Additional Info Index TABLE OF CONTENTS SILVERY FISHES (23) ........................... 47 African Pompano ......................................... 48 FOREWORD AND INTRODUCTION .............. 6 Crevalle Jack ................................................. 49 IDENTIFICATION IMAGES ...................... 10 Permit .......................................................... 50 Sharks and Rays ........................................ 10 Almaco Jack ................................................. 51 Illustrations of SharkCam
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Haemulon Sciurus
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 80(3): 473–495, 2007 nearsHore Habitat use BY GraY snaPPer (LUTJANUS GRISEUS) anD bluestriPED Grunt (HAEMULON SCIURUS): enVironmental GraDients anD ontoGenetic SHifts Craig H. Faunce and Joseph E. Serafy ABSTRACT Fringing mangrove forests and seagrass beds harbor high densities of juvenile snappers and grunts compared to bare substrates, but their occupancy of these habitats is not homogeneous at ecologically meaningful scales, thus limiting our ability to compare habitat value. Here, density and size information were used to de- termine how gray snapper, Lutjanus griseus (Linnaeus, 1758) and bluestriped grunt, Haemulon sciurus (Shaw, 1803), use vegetated habitats during their ontogeny, and how their use of mangrove forests varied with season across broad spatial scales and physicochemical conditions. Both species exhibited a three-stage ontogenetic strategy: (1) settlement and grow-out (8–10 mo) within seagrass beds, (2) expan- sion to mangrove habitats at 10–12 cm total length, and (3) increasing utilization of inland mangroves during the dry season and with increasing body size. For fishes inhabiting mangroves, multivariate tests revealed that the factors distance from oceanic inlet and water depth were stronger predictors of reef fish utilization than the factors latitude, temperature, or habitat width. These findings highlight that the nursery function of mangrove shorelines is likely limited to the area of immediately accessible habitat, and that more expansive forests may contain a substantial num- ber of larger adult individuals. The importance of coastal vegetated seascapes to the early life history stages of diadromous nekton has been well documented, and has led to the conclusion that many temperate and warm-water marine fishes are “estuarine dependent” G( unter, 1967; McHugh 1967; Day Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Marine Demersal Fishes Captured by the Pair Trawl Fisheries in Southern (RJ-SC) Brazil
    Biota Neotropica 19(1): e20170432, 2019 www.scielo.br/bn ISSN 1676-0611 (online edition) Inventory Checklist of marine demersal fishes captured by the pair trawl fisheries in Southern (RJ-SC) Brazil Matheus Marcos Rotundo1,2,3,4 , Evandro Severino-Rodrigues2, Walter Barrella4,5, Miguel Petrere Jun- ior3 & Milena Ramires4,5 1Universidade Santa Cecilia, Acervo Zoológico, R. Oswaldo Cruz, 266, CEP11045-907, Santos, SP, Brasil 2Instituto de Pesca, Programa de Pós-graduação em Aquicultura e Pesca, Santos, SP, Brasil 3Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Planejamento e Uso de Recursos Renováveis, Rodovia João Leme dos Santos, Km 110, CEP 18052-780, Sorocaba, SP, Brasil 4Universidade Santa Cecília, Programa de Pós-Graduação de Auditoria Ambiental, R. Oswaldo Cruz, 266, CEP11045-907, Santos, SP, Brasil 5Universidade Santa Cecília, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sustentabilidade de Ecossistemas Costeiros e Marinhos, R. Oswaldo Cruz, 266, CEP11045-907, Santos, SP, Brasil *Corresponding author: Matheus Marcos Rotundo: [email protected] ROTUNDO, M.M., SEVERINO-RODRIGUES, E., BARRELLA, W., PETRERE JUNIOR, M., RAMIRES, M. Checklist of marine demersal fishes captured by the pair trawl fisheries in Southern (RJ-SC) Brazil. Biota Neotropica. 19(1): e20170432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2017-0432 Abstract: Demersal fishery resources are abundant on continental shelves, on the tropical and subtropical coasts, making up a significant part of the marine environment. Marine demersal fishery resources are captured by various fishing methods, often unsustainably, which has led to the depletion of their stocks. In order to inventory the marine demersal ichthyofauna on the Southern Brazilian coast, as well as their conservation status and distribution, this study analyzed the composition and frequency of occurrence of fish captured by pair trawling in 117 fishery fleet landings based in the State of São Paulo between 2005 and 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Taverampe2018.Pdf
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 121 (2018) 212–223 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Multilocus phylogeny, divergence times, and a major role for the benthic-to- T pelagic axis in the diversification of grunts (Haemulidae) ⁎ Jose Taveraa,b, , Arturo Acero P.c, Peter C. Wainwrightb a Departamento de Biología, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia b Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States c Instituto de Estudios en Ciencias del Mar, CECIMAR, Universidad Nacional de Colombia sede Caribe, El Rodadero, Santa Marta, Colombia ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: We present a phylogenetic analysis with divergence time estimates, and an ecomorphological assessment of the Percomorpharia role of the benthic-to-pelagic axis of diversification in the history of haemulid fishes. Phylogenetic analyses were Fish performed on 97 grunt species based on sequence data collected from seven loci. Divergence time estimation Functional traits indicates that Haemulidae originated during the mid Eocene (54.7–42.3 Ma) but that the major lineages were Morphospace formed during the mid-Oligocene 30–25 Ma. We propose a new classification that reflects the phylogenetic Macroevolution history of grunts. Overall the pattern of morphological and functional diversification in grunts appears to be Zooplanktivore strongly linked with feeding ecology. Feeding traits and the first principal component of body shape strongly separate species that feed in benthic and pelagic habitats. The benthic-to-pelagic axis has been the major axis of ecomorphological diversification in this important group of tropical shoreline fishes, with about 13 transitions between feeding habitats that have had major consequences for head and body morphology.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum
    A REVIEW OF THE SPARID^ AND RELATED FAMILIES OF PERCH-LIKE FISHES FOUND IN THE WATERS OF JAPAN. By David Starr Jordan and William Francis Thompson, Of Stanford University, California. In the present paper is given a review of the species of fishes belonging to those percomorphoiis famihes alUed to the Sparoid fishes, or fishes related to the tai or porgy of the waters of Japan, which have not been hitherto discussed in these pages by the senior author and his associates. The families of Kuldiidse, Priacanthidse, Theraponidse, Banjosidae, Hsemulidae, Sparidse, Kyphosidse, and Ery- thrichthyidse are thus included. The paper is based on material collected in Japan in 1900 by Pro- fessors Jordan and Snyder and now divided between the United States National Museum and the museum of Stanford University. Most of the cuts are from drawings by Mr. Sekko Shimada. The families here named are adopted provisionally only. The dis- tinctions between Sparidse, Haemulidse, Lutianidae, and their relatives are of doubtful value, while at present no definite boundaries can be assigned to the Serranidse. L Family KUHLIID.^. Body oblong, strongly compressed; scales large, cihated. Lateral line complete, the tubes straight and occupying the half or more of the exposed surface of the scale. Mouth rather large, protractile; maxillary exposed, without supplemental bone; teeth in jaws in villi- form bands; teeth on vomer, palatines, entopterygoids, and ecto- pterygoids; tongue smooth; head partly naked; preorbital and pre- opercle denticulate; opercle with 2 spines. Gill membranes separate; 6 branchiostegals; pseudobranchise large; gill-rakers long and slender. Dorsal fms connected at the base, with X, 9 to 13 rays, the spinous portion longer than the soft.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes from the United States And
    t a AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY QL 614 .A43 V.2 .A 4-3 AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY Special Publication No. 2 A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes -^ ru from the United States m CD and Canada (SECOND EDITION) A/^Ssrf>* '-^\ —---^ Report of the Committee on Names of Fishes, Presented at the Ei^ty-ninth Annual Meeting, Clearwater, Florida, September 16-18, 1959 Reeve M. Bailey, Chairman Ernest A. Lachner, C. C. Lindsey, C. Richard Robins Phil M. Roedel, W. B. Scott, Loren P. Woods Ann Arbor, Michigan • 1960 Copies of this publication may be purchased for $1.00 each (paper cover) or $2.00 (cloth cover). Orders, accompanied by remittance payable to the American Fisheries Society, should be addressed to E. A. Seaman, Secretary-Treasurer, American Fisheries Society, Box 483, McLean, Virginia. Copyright 1960 American Fisheries Society Printed by Waverly Press, Inc. Baltimore, Maryland lutroduction This second list of the names of fishes of The shore fishes from Greenland, eastern the United States and Canada is not sim- Canada and the United States, and the ply a reprinting with corrections, but con- northern Gulf of Mexico to the mouth of stitutes a major revision and enlargement. the Rio Grande are included, but those The earlier list, published in 1948 as Special from Iceland, Bermuda, the Bahamas, Cuba Publication No. 1 of the American Fisheries and the other West Indian islands, and Society, has been widely used and has Mexico are excluded unless they occur also contributed substantially toward its goal of in the region covered. In the Pacific, the achieving uniformity and avoiding confusion area treated includes that part of the conti- in nomenclature.
    [Show full text]
  • Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations Biological Sciences Summer 2016 Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes Christi Linardich Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Biology Commons, Environmental Health and Protection Commons, and the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Linardich, Christi. "Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes" (2016). Master of Science (MS), Thesis, Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/hydh-jp82 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds/13 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOTSPOTS, EXTINCTION RISK AND CONSERVATION PRIORITIES OF GREATER CARIBBEAN AND GULF OF MEXICO MARINE BONY SHOREFISHES by Christi Linardich B.A. December 2006, Florida Gulf Coast University A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE BIOLOGY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August 2016 Approved by: Kent E. Carpenter (Advisor) Beth Polidoro (Member) Holly Gaff (Member) ABSTRACT HOTSPOTS, EXTINCTION RISK AND CONSERVATION PRIORITIES OF GREATER CARIBBEAN AND GULF OF MEXICO MARINE BONY SHOREFISHES Christi Linardich Old Dominion University, 2016 Advisor: Dr. Kent E. Carpenter Understanding the status of species is important for allocation of resources to redress biodiversity loss.
    [Show full text]