DOCSLIB.ORG

A Hypergiant with Pulsar Companion

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AA manuscript no will b e inserted by hand later ASTRONOMY AND Your thesaurus co des are ASTROPHYSICS Wray GX Wray GX a hypergiant with pulsar ? companion 1 23 456 45 78 L Kap er HJGLM Lamers E Ruymaekers EPJ van den Heuvel and EJ Zuiderwijk 1 Europ ean Southern Observatory Karl Schwarzschild Str D Garching b ei M unchen Germany 2 Sterrekundig Instituut Princetonplei n Postbus Utrecht The Netherlands 3 SRON Utrecht Sorb onnelaan CA Utrecht The Netherlands 4 Astronomical Institute Anton Pannekoek University of Amsterdam Kruislaan SJ Amsterdam The Netherlands 5 Center for High Energy Astrophysics CHEAF Kruislaan SJ Amsterdam The Netherlands 6 Instituut voor Sterrenkunde KU Leuven Celestijnenlaan B Heverlee Belgium 7 Kapteyn Astronomical Institute Postbus AV Groningen The Netherlands 8 Royal Greenwich Observatory Madingley Road Cambridge CB EZ England Received November Accepted January Abstract Wray the B sup ergiant companion of the They derived a sp ectral type of B Iae for the su Xray pulsar GX should b e classied as B Ia p ergiant and concluded that the massloss rate is probably 6 1 based on a comparison of its optical sp ectrum to that of higher than M yr adding the remark that 1 Sco a wellknown B hypergiant and one of the bright the sp ectrum of Wray do es show more signs of mass est stars in our galaxy The classication of Wray as loss than a normal B sup ergiant Adopting V a hypergiant results in a new distance determination of HammerschlagHensberge et al and absolute mag the binary system ie d kp c previously nitude M for a B Ia star Balona Crampton V kp c The average Xray luminosity of the pulsar is then they derived a distance to Wray of 37 1 erg s in go o d agreement with the predicted X kp c This distance implied an average Xray luminosity of 36 1 ray luminosity resulting from accretion of a dense low erg s for the s pulsar GX 1 velocity v km s stellar wind A massloss rate The orbital p erio d of this highmass Xray binary sys 1 5 1 of M yr is estimated from the H prole A tem HMXB is days Watson et al based new upp er limit for the inclination of the system is de on the p erio dicity in Xray aring events of GX rived which provides a lower limit to the present mass Pulsetiming analysis carried out by White Swank of Wray M Regarding current binary evolution and from a more extended dataset by Sato et al scenarios the empirical lower mass limit for blackhole resulted in the accurate determination of the or M formation in a binary increases to M bital elements of GX The system is characterized Z AM S by a large eccentricity e and the mass function Key words Stars binaries close Stars evolution f m M is the highest known for a HMXB Stars individual Wray Stars pulsars individual with pulsar companion The latter fact was used by Van GX Stars sup ergiants Xrays stars den Heuvel Hab ets to derive an observational astro-ph/9503003 01 Mar 1995 lower mass limit for blackhole formation M Z AM S M in a massive binary Given the sup ergiants radius R Parkes et al the absence of an eclipse in the Xray lightcurve constrains the inclination of the sys tem to i A plausible set of parameters is i Introduction and hence from the mass function M M Sato et al The most recent sp ectral study of Wray BP Cru the Several authors have tried to explain the observed optical counterpart Vidal of the binary Xray pul mo dulation of the Xray luminosity of GX with or sar GX U was presented by Parkes et al bital phase White Swank prop osed that the mass loss from Wray must b e extreme and that the Send oprint requests to L Kap er wind velocity at the neutron stars orbit is much lower Based on observations obtained at the Europ ean Southern Observatory than usually adopted for a normal B sup ergiant Leahy L Kap er et al Wray GX a hypergiant with pulsar companion 1 Fig The optical sp ectrum of Wray b ottom from A and that of the hypergiant Sco top are very similar 1 A line of Wray are stronger and The sp ectrum of Sco was kindly provided to us by Dr O Stahl The H and He i 1 have a P Cygnitype prole suggesting that Wray has an even higher massloss rate than Sco The O i i lines are stronger 1 and the N i i lines weaker than those in the sp ectrum of Sco indicating that Wray has a slightly earlier sp ectral type 1 than Sco ie B Ia The strong O i i lines the relatively weak He i A line in comparison with the Si i i i lines and the strong Balmer emission are consistent with an extremely high luminosity of Wray and Hab erl suggested that a gas stream in using line strength ratios of Si ivHe i Mg i iHe i and the system might b e resp onsible for the observed drastic O i iHe i The great strength of the O i i lines particularly increase in Xray luminosity just b efore each p eriastron O i i A is indicative of a high luminosity Therefore passage In the following we will present arguments that they prop osed that the sp ectral type of Wray is B Ia Wray is not a normal B sup ergiant but a B hyper giant This results in a new distance determination of the system new estimates for the various stellar parameters Table Log of observations of Wray obtained with the are given in Section including a new lower limit to the ESO m telscop e and CASPEC the orbital phase is calcu mass of Wray In the nal section we discuss the im lated from JD mo d given in Sato et 0 plications for massive binary evolution al JD 4 t Orbital exp Sp ectral classication and luminosity of Feb A sec phase Wray In Figs and we show parts of the optical sp ectrum of Wray obtained in February with the Cassegrain sp ectrograph CASPEC mounted on the m telescop e at the Europ ean Southern Observatory in Chile Tab The sp ectra partly cover the wavelength region from to A The Balmer up to H and the strong he In the atlas of optical sp ectra of galactic B sup ergiants lium lines have P Cygnitype proles indicating a strong Lennon et al only one of the early B sup ergiants stellar wind The H emission combined with sp ectral shows emission in the Balmer series HD with sp ec type B usually classies a star as Be but for a Be star the tral type B Ia The classication refers to a class luminosity class should b e in the range VI I I cf Underhill of sup ersup ergiants Keenan initially consisting Doazan Hammerschlag et al and Parkes of the four reddest of the brightest stars in the Large et al classied the optical sp ectrum of Wray Magellanic Cloud Feast Thackeray Van Gen L Kap er et al Wray GX a hypergiant with pulsar companion 1 Fig The optical sp ectrum of Sco and Wray in the wavelength region from to A Note the weaker N i i lines in the sp ectrum of Wray and the stronger emission in the He i prole at A Although a uorescence line of Fe i i i is 1 present in the sp ectrum of Sco the bad SN prohibits a rm detection of this line in this part of the sp ectrum of Wray deren named these stars hypergiants A wellknown N i i lines weaker than their counterparts in the sp ectrum 1 1 earlyB hypergiant is Sco HD one of the most of Sco which is conrmed by the measured EWs listed luminous stars in our galaxy It is lo cated in the neigh in Table Using the atlases of OBstar sp ectra by Lennon b ourho o d of the op en cluster NGC in the asso ciation et al and Walborn Fitzpatrick we con I Scorpii which has a distance mo dulus m M clude that Wray has a slightly earlier sp ectral type 0 1 1 Stothers The sp ectral type of Sco is B Ia than Sco B in stead of B For this sp ectral type T K App enzeller Wolf and the ab the relative strength of the He i A line compared to ef f solute magnitude M Humphreys The the Si i i i lines at provides a go o d indica V ultraviolet P Cygni proles can b e found in Wolf Ap tion of the luminosity class The fact that the He i line is p enzeller and are comprised in the new IUE atlas weaker than the Si i i i lines clearly demonstrates that the of Snow et al luminosity class is Ia see Walborn Fitzpatrick Indeed the sp ectrum of HD BIa resembles the If we compare the optical sp ectrum of Wray with sp ectrum of Wray even more Wolf private commu 1 that of Sco Figs and we note that the two sp ectra nication are very similar To enable a more quantitative compar ison we have measured the equivalent widths EWs of Wolf Stahl found that uorescence lines of the most imp ortant sp ectral lines in the wavelength range Fe i i i are sensitive to luminosity in earlyB sup ergiants A Table The uncertainty in EW due to eg An example of an Fe i i i emission line at A and at 1 the normalization of the sp ectra is estimated to b e A at the b order of the plot in the sp ectrum of Sco or less A careful insp ection of the sp ectra shows that the is shown in Fig in agreement with the hypergiant na O i i lines in the sp ectrum of Wray are stronger and the ture of this star Due to the bad signaltonoise in this L Kap er et al Wray GX a hypergiant with pulsar companion part of the sp ectrum of Wray we can not conrm the 1 Table Line equivalent widths for Sco and Wray The presence of this line although an emission feature might uncertainty in EW is estimated to b e or less Some uniden b e identied at A tied lines may corresp ond to interstellar features Finally the P Cygni shap e of the H Balmer and the strong He i lines is consistent with the extreme luminos Line A EW A EW A Remarks ity of Wray Rosendhal showed that the net 1 Sco Wray strength of H is correlated with luminosity
Recommended publications
  • Negreiros Lecture II

    Negreiros Lecture II

    General Relativity and Neutron Stars - II Rodrigo Negreiros – UFF - Brazil Outline • Compact Stars • Spherically Symmetric • Rotating Compact Stars • Magnetized Compact Stars References for this lecture Compact Stars • Relativistic stars with inner structure • We need to solve Einstein’s equation for the interior as well as the exterior Compact Stars - Spherical • We begin by writing the following metric • Which leads to the following components of the Riemman curvature tensor Compact Stars - Spherical • The Ricci tensor components are calculated as • Ricci scalar is given by Compact Stars - Spherical • Now we can calculate Einstein’s equation as 휇 • Where we used a perfect fluid as sources ( 푇휈 = 푑푖푎푔(휖, 푃, 푃, 푃)) Compact Stars - Spherical • Einstein’s equation define the space-time curvature • We must also enforce energy-momentum conservation • This implies that • Where the four velocity is given by • After some algebra we get Compact Stars - Spherical • Making use of Euler’s equation we get • Thus • Which we can rewrite as Compact Stars - Spherical • Now we introduce • Which allow us to integrate one of Einstein’s equation, leading to • After some shuffling of Einstein’s equation we can write Summary so far... Metric Energy-Momentum Tensor Einstein’s equation Tolmann-Oppenheimer-Volkoff eq. Relativistic Hydrostatic Equilibrium Mass continuity Stellar structure calculation Microscopic Ewuation of State Macroscopic Composition Structure Recapitulando … “Feed” with diferente microscopic models Microscopic Ewuation of State Macroscopic Composition Structure Compare predicted properties with Observed data. Rotating Compact Stars • During its evolution, compact stars may acquire high rotational frequencies (possibly up to 500 hz) • Rotation breaks spherical symmetry, increasing the degrees of freedom.
  • Exploring Pulsars

    Exploring Pulsars

    High-energy astrophysics Explore the PUL SAR menagerie Astronomers are discovering many strange properties of compact stellar objects called pulsars. Here’s how they fit together. by Victoria M. Kaspi f you browse through an astronomy book published 25 years ago, you’d likely assume that astronomers understood extremely dense objects called neutron stars fairly well. The spectacular Crab Nebula’s central body has been a “poster child” for these objects for years. This specific neutron star is a pulsar that I rotates roughly 30 times per second, emitting regular appar- ent pulsations in Earth’s direction through a sort of “light- house” effect as the star rotates. While these textbook descriptions aren’t incorrect, research over roughly the past decade has shown that the picture they portray is fundamentally incomplete. Astrono- mers know that the simple scenario where neutron stars are all born “Crab-like” is not true. Experts in the field could not have imagined the variety of neutron stars they’ve recently observed. We’ve found that bizarre objects repre- sent a significant fraction of the neutron star population. With names like magnetars, anomalous X-ray pulsars, soft gamma repeaters, rotating radio transients, and compact Long the pulsar poster child, central objects, these bodies bear properties radically differ- the Crab Nebula’s central object is a fast-spinning neutron star ent from those of the Crab pulsar. Just how large a fraction that emits jets of radiation at its they represent is still hotly debated, but it’s at least 10 per- magnetic axis. Astronomers cent and maybe even the majority.
  • Neutron Stars

    Neutron Stars

    Chandra X-Ray Observatory X-Ray Astronomy Field Guide Neutron Stars Ordinary matter, or the stuff we and everything around us is made of, consists largely of empty space. Even a rock is mostly empty space. This is because matter is made of atoms. An atom is a cloud of electrons orbiting around a nucleus composed of protons and neutrons. The nucleus contains more than 99.9 percent of the mass of an atom, yet it has a diameter of only 1/100,000 that of the electron cloud. The electrons themselves take up little space, but the pattern of their orbit defines the size of the atom, which is therefore 99.9999999999999% Chandra Image of Vela Pulsar open space! (NASA/PSU/G.Pavlov et al. What we perceive as painfully solid when we bump against a rock is really a hurly-burly of electrons moving through empty space so fast that we can't see—or feel—the emptiness. What would matter look like if it weren't empty, if we could crush the electron cloud down to the size of the nucleus? Suppose we could generate a force strong enough to crush all the emptiness out of a rock roughly the size of a football stadium. The rock would be squeezed down to the size of a grain of sand and would still weigh 4 million tons! Such extreme forces occur in nature when the central part of a massive star collapses to form a neutron star. The atoms are crushed completely, and the electrons are jammed inside the protons to form a star composed almost entirely of neutrons.
  • Brochure Pulsar Multifunction Spectroscopy Service Complete Cased Hole Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Saturation Monitoring from A

    Brochure Pulsar Multifunction Spectroscopy Service Complete Cased Hole Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Saturation Monitoring from A

    Pulsar Multifunction spectroscopy service Introducing environment-independent, stand-alone cased hole formation evaluation and saturation monitoring 1 APPLICATIONS FEATURES AND BENEFITS ■ Stand-alone formation evaluation for diagnosis of bypassed ■ Environment-independent reservoir saturation monitoring ■ High-performance pulsed neutron generator (PNG) hydrocarbons, depleted reservoirs, and gas zones in any formation water salinity ● Optimized pulsing scheme with multiple square and short ● Differentiation of gas-filled porosity from very low porosity ● Production fluid profile determination for any well pulses for clean separation in measuring both inelastic and formations by using neutron porosity and fast neutron cross inclination: horizontal, deviated, and vertical capture gamma rays 8 section (FNXS) measurements ● Detection of water entry and flow behind casing ● High neutron output of 3.5 × 10 neutron/s for greater ■ measurement precision Petrophysical evaluation with greater accuracy by accounting ● Gravel-pack quality determination by using for grain density and mineral properties in neutron porosity elemental spectroscopy ■ State-of-the-art detectors ■ Total organic carbon (TOC) quantified as the difference ■ Metals for mining exploration ● Near and far detectors: cerium-doped lanthanum bromide between the measured total carbon and inorganic carbon ■ High-resolution determination of reservoir quality (RQ) (LaBr3:Ce) ■ Oil volume from TOC and completion quality (CQ) for formation evaluation ● Deep detector: yttrium aluminum perovskite
  • Rosette Nebula and Monoceros Loop

    Rosette Nebula and Monoceros Loop

    Oshkosh Scholar Page 43 Studying Complex Star-Forming Fields: Rosette Nebula and Monoceros Loop Chris Hathaway and Anthony Kuchera, co-authors Dr. Nadia Kaltcheva, Physics and Astronomy, faculty adviser Christopher Hathaway obtained a B.S. in physics in 2007 and is currently pursuing his masters in physics education at UW Oshkosh. He collaborated with Dr. Nadia Kaltcheva on his senior research project and presented their findings at theAmerican Astronomical Society meeting (2008), the Celebration of Scholarship at UW Oshkosh (2009), and the National Conference on Undergraduate Research in La Crosse, Wisconsin (2009). Anthony Kuchera graduated from UW Oshkosh in May 2008 with a B.S. in physics. He collaborated with Dr. Kaltcheva from fall 2006 through graduation. He presented his astronomy-related research at Posters in the Rotunda (2007 and 2008), the Wisconsin Space Conference (2007), the UW System Symposium for Undergraduate Research and Creative Activity (2007 and 2008), and the American Astronomical Society’s 211th meeting (2008). In December 2009 he earned an M.S. in physics from Florida State University where he is currently working toward a Ph.D. in experimental nuclear physics. Dr. Nadia Kaltcheva is a professor of physics and astronomy. She received her Ph.D. from the University of Sofia in Bulgaria. She joined the UW Oshkosh Physics and Astronomy Department in 2001. Her research interests are in the field of stellar photometry and its application to the study of Galactic star-forming fields and the spiral structure of the Milky Way. Abstract An investigation that presents a new analysis of the structure of the Northern Monoceros field was recently completed at the Department of Physics andAstronomy at UW Oshkosh.
  • R-Process Elements from Magnetorotational Hypernovae

    R-Process Elements from Magnetorotational Hypernovae

    r-Process elements from magnetorotational hypernovae D. Yong1,2*, C. Kobayashi3,2, G. S. Da Costa1,2, M. S. Bessell1, A. Chiti4, A. Frebel4, K. Lind5, A. D. Mackey1,2, T. Nordlander1,2, M. Asplund6, A. R. Casey7,2, A. F. Marino8, S. J. Murphy9,1 & B. P. Schmidt1 1Research School of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2611, Australia 2ARC Centre of Excellence for All Sky Astrophysics in 3 Dimensions (ASTRO 3D), Australia 3Centre for Astrophysics Research, Department of Physics, Astronomy and Mathematics, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK 4Department of Physics and Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 5Department of Astronomy, Stockholm University, AlbaNova University Center, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 6Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, D-85741 Garching, Germany 7School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia 8Istituto NaZionale di Astrofisica - Osservatorio Astronomico di Arcetri, Largo Enrico Fermi, 5, 50125, Firenze, Italy 9School of Science, The University of New South Wales, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia Neutron-star mergers were recently confirmed as sites of rapid-neutron-capture (r-process) nucleosynthesis1–3. However, in Galactic chemical evolution models, neutron-star mergers alone cannot reproduce the observed element abundance patterns of extremely metal-poor stars, which indicates the existence of other sites of r-process nucleosynthesis4–6. These sites may be investigated by studying the element abundance patterns of chemically primitive stars in the halo of the Milky Way, because these objects retain the nucleosynthetic signatures of the earliest generation of stars7–13.
  • Introduction to Astronomy from Darkness to Blazing Glory

    Introduction to Astronomy from Darkness to Blazing Glory

    Introduction to Astronomy From Darkness to Blazing Glory Published by JAS Educational Publications Copyright Pending 2010 JAS Educational Publications All rights reserved. Including the right of reproduction in whole or in part in any form. Second Edition Author: Jeffrey Wright Scott Photographs and Diagrams: Credit NASA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, USGS, NOAA, Aames Research Center JAS Educational Publications 2601 Oakdale Road, H2 P.O. Box 197 Modesto California 95355 1-888-586-6252 Website: http://.Introastro.com Printing by Minuteman Press, Berkley, California ISBN 978-0-9827200-0-4 1 Introduction to Astronomy From Darkness to Blazing Glory The moon Titan is in the forefront with the moon Tethys behind it. These are two of many of Saturn’s moons Credit: Cassini Imaging Team, ISS, JPL, ESA, NASA 2 Introduction to Astronomy Contents in Brief Chapter 1: Astronomy Basics: Pages 1 – 6 Workbook Pages 1 - 2 Chapter 2: Time: Pages 7 - 10 Workbook Pages 3 - 4 Chapter 3: Solar System Overview: Pages 11 - 14 Workbook Pages 5 - 8 Chapter 4: Our Sun: Pages 15 - 20 Workbook Pages 9 - 16 Chapter 5: The Terrestrial Planets: Page 21 - 39 Workbook Pages 17 - 36 Mercury: Pages 22 - 23 Venus: Pages 24 - 25 Earth: Pages 25 - 34 Mars: Pages 34 - 39 Chapter 6: Outer, Dwarf and Exoplanets Pages: 41-54 Workbook Pages 37 - 48 Jupiter: Pages 41 - 42 Saturn: Pages 42 - 44 Uranus: Pages 44 - 45 Neptune: Pages 45 - 46 Dwarf Planets, Plutoids and Exoplanets: Pages 47 -54 3 Chapter 7: The Moons: Pages: 55 - 66 Workbook Pages 49 - 56 Chapter 8: Rocks and Ice:
  • The Young Stellar Population of IC 1613 III

    The Young Stellar Population of IC 1613 III

    A&A 551, A74 (2013) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219977 & c ESO 2013 Astrophysics The young stellar population of IC 1613 III. New O-type stars unveiled by GTC-OSIRIS,, M. Garcia1,2 and A. Herrero1,2 1 Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, C/Vía Láctea s/n, 38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain e-mail: [email protected] 2 Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, Avda. Astrofísico Francisco Sánchez, s/n, 38071 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain Received 9 July 2012 / Accepted 16 November 2012 ABSTRACT Context. Very low-metallicity massive stars are key to understanding the reionization epoch. Radiation-driven winds, chief agents in the evolution of massive stars, are consequently an important ingredient in our models of the early-Universe. Recent findings hint that the winds of massive stars with poorer metallicity than the SMC may be stronger than predicted by theory. Besides calling the paradigm of radiation-driven winds into question, this result would affect the calculated ionizing radiation and mechanical feedback of massive stars, as well as the role these objects play at different stages of the Universe. Aims. The field needs a systematic study of the winds of a large sample of very metal-poor massive stars. The sampling of spectral types is particularly poor in the very early types. This paper’s goal is to increase the list of known O-type stars in the dwarf irregular galaxy IC 1613, whose metallicity is lower than the SMC’s roughly by a factor 2. Methods. Using the reddening-free Q pseudo-colour, evolutionary masses, and GALEX photometry, we built a list of very likely O-type stars.
  • Pos(INTEGRAL 2010)091

    Pos(INTEGRAL 2010)091

    A candidate former companion star to the Magnetar CXOU J164710.2-455216 in the massive Galactic cluster Westerlund 1 PoS(INTEGRAL 2010)091 P.J. Kavanagh 1 School of Physical Sciences and NCPST, Dublin City University Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland E-mail: [email protected] E.J.A. Meurs School of Cosmic Physics, DIAS, and School of Physical Sciences, DCU Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland E-mail: [email protected] L. Norci School of Physical Sciences and NCPST, Dublin City University Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland E-mail: [email protected] Besides carrying the distinction of being the most massive young star cluster in our Galaxy, Westerlund 1 contains the notable Magnetar CXOU J164710.2-455216. While this is the only collapsed stellar remnant known for this cluster, a further ~10² Supernovae may have occurred on the basis of the cluster Initial Mass Function, possibly all leaving Black Holes. We identify a candidate former companion to the Magnetar in view of its high proper motion directed away from the Magnetar region, viz. the Luminous Blue Variable W243. We discuss the properties of W243 and how they pertain to the former Magnetar companion hypothesis. Binary evolution arguments are employed to derive a progenitor mass for the Magnetar of 24-25 M Sun , just within the progenitor mass range for Neutron Star birth. We also draw attention to another candidate to be member of a former massive binary. 8th INTEGRAL Workshop “The Restless Gamma-ray Universe” Dublin, Ireland September 27-30, 2010 1 Speaker Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence.
  • Supernova 2007Bi Was a Pair-Instability Explosion

    Supernova 2007Bi Was a Pair-Instability Explosion

    Supernova 2007bi was a pair-instability explosion A. Gal-Yam, Benoziyo Center for Astrophysics, Faculty of Physics, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel, P. Mazzali, Max-Planck-Institut f¨ur Astrophysik, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, 85748 Garching, Germany, and Scuola Normale Superiore, Piazza Cavalieri 7, 56127 Pisa, Italy, E. O. Ofek, Department of Astronomy, 105-24, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA, P. E. Nugent, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411, USA, S. R. Kulkarni, M. M. Kasliwal, R. M. Quimby, Department of Astronomy, 105-24, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA, A. V. Filippenko, S. B. Cenko, R. Chornock, Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411, USA, R. Waldman, The Racah Institute of Physics, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel, D. Kasen, Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA, M. Sullivan, Department of Astrophysics, University of Oxford, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK, arXiv:1001.1156v1 [astro-ph.CO] 7 Jan 2010 E. C. Beshore, Department of Planetary Sciences, Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, 1629 E. University Blvd, Tucson AZ 85721, USA, A. J. Drake, Department of Astronomy, 105-24, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA, R. C. Thomas, Luis W. Alvarez Fellow, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411, USA, J. S. Bloom, D. Poznanski, A. A. Miller, Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411, USA, R. J. Foley, Clay Fellow, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, J.
  • Active OB Stars: Structure, Evolution, Mass Loss, and Critical Limits Proceedings IAU Symposium No

    Active OB Stars: Structure, Evolution, Mass Loss, and Critical Limits Proceedings IAU Symposium No

    Active OB stars: structure, evolution, mass loss, and critical limits Proceedings IAU Symposium No. 272, 2010 c International Astronomical Union 2011 C. Neiner, G. Wade, G. Meynet & G. Peters, eds. doi:10.1017/S1743921311009914 Active OB Stars - an introduction Dietrich Baade1, Thomas Rivinius2,StanislasSteflˇ 2,and Christophe Martayan2 1 European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2, 85748 Garching. b. M¨unchen, Germany email: [email protected] 2 European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere, Casilla 19001, Santiago 19, Chile email: [email protected], [email protected],[email protected] Abstract. Identifying seven activities and activity-carrying properties and nine classes of Active OB Stars, the OB Star Activity Matrix is constructed to map the parameter space. On its basis, the occurrence and appearance of the main activities are described as a function of stellar class. Attention is also paid to selected combinations of activities with classes of Active OB Stars. Current issues are identified and suggestions are developed for future work and strategies. Keywords. stars: activity, stars: binaries, stars: circumstellar matter, stars: early-type, stars: emission-line, Be, stars: magnetic fields, stars: mass loss, stars: oscillations, stars: rotation 1. Active OB Stars: the concept 1.1. The activities The term Active B Stars was introduced in 1994 when the IAU Working Group on Be Stars was renamed Working Group on Active B Stars. The name was to capture all physical processes that might be active in Be stars and so be required to understand Be and other active B stars, similar to Richard Thomas’ standing characterization of Be stars as the crossroads of OB stars.
  • PSR J1740-3052: a Pulsar with a Massive Companion

    PSR J1740-3052: a Pulsar with a Massive Companion

    Haverford College Haverford Scholarship Faculty Publications Physics 2001 PSR J1740-3052: a Pulsar with a Massive Companion I. H. Stairs R. N. Manchester A. G. Lyne V. M. Kaspi Fronefield Crawford Haverford College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.haverford.edu/physics_facpubs Repository Citation "PSR J1740-3052: a Pulsar with a Massive Companion" I. H. Stairs, R. N. Manchester, A. G. Lyne, V. M. Kaspi, F. Camilo, J. F. Bell, N. D'Amico, M. Kramer, F. Crawford, D. J. Morris, A. Possenti, N. P. F. McKay, S. L. Lumsden, L. E. Tacconi-Garman, R. D. Cannon, N. C. Hambly, & P. R. Wood, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 325, 979 (2001). This Journal Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Physics at Haverford Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Haverford Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 325, 979–988 (2001) PSR J174023052: a pulsar with a massive companion I. H. Stairs,1,2P R. N. Manchester,3 A. G. Lyne,1 V. M. Kaspi,4† F. Camilo,5 J. F. Bell,3 N. D’Amico,6,7 M. Kramer,1 F. Crawford,8‡ D. J. Morris,1 A. Possenti,6 N. P. F. McKay,1 S. L. Lumsden,9 L. E. Tacconi-Garman,10 R. D. Cannon,11 N. C. Hambly12 and P. R. Wood13 1University of Manchester, Jodrell Bank Observatory, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK11 9DL 2National Radio Astronomy Observatory, PO Box 2, Green Bank, WV 24944, USA 3Australia Telescope National Facility, CSIRO, PO Box 76, Epping, NSW 1710, Australia 4Physics Department, McGill University, 3600 University Street, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2T8, Canada 5Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, Columbia University, 550 W.