Pastoral Leadership and Staffing - 2005

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pastoral Leadership and Staffing - 2005 Archdiocese of Louisville PASTORAL LEADERSHIP AND STAFFING - 2005 INTRODUCTION Late in 2004 the Archdiocese 20 to 30% of the population is financial pressures have increased, of Louisville released a demo- in poverty or at risk for poverty and external shifts have occurred graphic report. This study analyzed in most of the counties of the that have affected the viability of the make-up of the Catholic Archdiocese. The highest lev- traditional ministries, such as population as well as general els of poverty are concentrated Catholic schools. At the same time, population trends; existing parish in the most rural and most ur- the Church has experienced and school structures; the number ban areas. growth in lay ministry and an of priests; and external challenges expansion of ministry services. and opportunities (aging popu- Since the report was released, lation, poverty) facing the parishes, both individually and in One of the basic challenges Archdiocese. regions, have been discussing its facing the Church is to provide implications for planning. In order parish ministers that are adequate The study identified several to assist parishes with planning, in number and quality. The specific major trends: we are presenting a companion challenge for the Archdiocese is to There is a major redistribution staffing study that examines the recruit, train, and nurture and growth of the Catholic current reality as well as models professional ministers and to population in Jefferson County that can be considered for the encourage effective stewardship of from the urban core to subur- future. the resources that have been ban and surrounding counties. entrusted to our care. These Parishes exist to carry out the challenges require reflection and There is growth in multicultural mission of the Church and to populations in several areas of action in the areas of structural provide pastoral care to their change (opening, closing, and the Archdiocese, especially the members. Parish planning allows Hispanic population. merging parishes, schools, and parishes to create the most effective other ministries) and human The Archdiocese contains a system of programs, ministries, and resources (recruitment, retention, larger percentage of smaller services to meet these dual and new leadership models.) parishes than is present nation- obligations. During the last fifteen ally. years, parishes have increasingly There is a decline in the num- looked beyond their parish ber of priests available to serve boundaries to work with other the Catholic population. parishes to more effectively and There are declining numbers efficiently carry out their mission. of school-aged children and This process of regional projections of a dramatic planning and collaboration has growth in the senior popula- taken on added urgency as the tion. number of priests has declined, 1 PASTORAL MODEL 1: INDIVIDUAL MODEL 3: PASTORAL LEADERSHIP PARISH WITH PRIEST ADMINISTRATOR PASTOR The declining number of This model involves sepa- ordained priests has made the In this model each indi- rate parishes with a pastoral primary leadership position in the vidual parish is a separate administrator as leader. A parish the subject of sustained community and has its own pastoral administrator is a discussion. The reality is, however, pastor. Fifty-five (45%) of our deacon, religious, or lay man that there are three basic 122 parishes operate under or woman appointed by the approaches to the challenge of this model. Archbishop to provide pastoral pastoral leadership for a parish: care and administrative oversight to a parish. Pastoral 1) Continue to assign the same administrators are assisted by amount (and in some cases sacramental moderators who growing amount of) work to provide sacramental ministry decreasing numbers of priests. to the parish and are monitored Priests may take more than one MODEL 2: FORMAL by presbyteral moderators who parish (e.g. cluster), or only one COORDINATED MINISTRY have canonical powers and priest may serve large parishes. faculties for the parish. Sacra- In this model, individual mental moderators and presby- 2) Give some of the work to parishes decide to work with teral moderators may be the persons other than priests, such as one or more other parishes to same priest or different priests. pastoral administrators. Pastoral provide services and avoid This model also can be struc- administrators can be deacons, duplication of ministries. For tured with a pastoral admini- religious women, or lay persons. example, parishes in a region strator assisted by a priest as Parishes also may decide to expand may decide to come together presbyteral and sacramental professional staff to take on and coordinate their Mass moderator who also serves as delegated responsibilities from the schedules so that there is not a a pastor at another parish. pastor. duplication of weekend litur- Generally the pastoral admini- 3) Attempt to reduce the gies. Parishes also may work strator assumes all of the amount of work for priests or others together to discern needs and operational responsibility for by closing or merging parishes. offer services or to share staff the parish, including planning, or co-sponsor programs. Our formation, parish life, finances, In this Archdiocese, we have Archdiocese has the majority etc., except for the celebration employed versions of all three of its experience with this of the sacraments. We have approaches to meet these chal- model in school planning. The eight parishes (6%) operating lenges. Throughout the United recent development of re- under this model right now. States, other versions of these gional schools being spon- Five of these parishes are led approaches have been used. The sored by 3 or more parishes is by deacons, 1 by a lay woman, following list summarizes models an example of formal coordi- and 2 by religious women. that are being used to address nated ministry. parish leadership and staffing challenges: 2 ODEL LUSTER ODEL LUSTER M 4: C M 5: C MODEL 6: MULTIPLE TEAM A cluster involves two or WORSHIP SITES more parishes that remain Though not in use in this This approach involves a separate but have one leader. Archdiocese, some dioceses single parish using more than The leader can be either a priest are experimenting with one worship site for Mass and or pastoral administrator. This groups of parishes being other celebrations. The par- model requires a limited served by a team of priests ish may use multiple amount of organizational appointed to serve in soli- churches, such as when a change, but can be a challenge dum (Canon 517.1) or by a parish has an oratory or a for the priest pastor depending team of priests and other pro- chapel, or it may use a facility upon the organizational fessional staff members. This other than a church when a complexity of the parishes leaves individual parishes in- space is needed for large gath- involved. tact, but assigns pastoral re- erings. sponsibility for two or more This model offers the parishes to a team that can be opportunity to foster interparish made up of priests or a com- collaboration. Some pastors bination of priests, deacons, use this opportunity to and lay staff. Each parish encourage more collaboration maintains its own identity and among the parishes to be has its own parish council, MODEL 7: MERGER clustered by sharing staff and but all of the team members resources, coordinating Mass serve all of the parishes. By When population shifts, times, etc. Others maintain very necessity this approach fos- finances, or other factors in- distinct parish organizations at ters interparish collaboration dicate a need to reduce the each of the clustered parishes. and joint ministry efforts, es- number of parishes in a given Both the geographic proximity pecially in formation and ser- area, two or more parishes and the leadership style of the vice programs. In some forms may be merged into one new pastor affect these decisions. of this model, parishes may parish. When a merger oc- We have 59 parishes (48%) form “clusters” where there is curs, the parish communities operating under this model as much joint effort as pos- and staff are combined, a now. sible, including joint parish single pastor is appointed, and finance councils, joint and one worship site and fa- committees, coordinated cility is usually established on worship and prayer services, the site of one of the merging joint schools, and other col- parishes. We have merged a laborative ministries and pro- number of parishes over the gramming. years. 3 VOCATIONS TO THE PRIESTHOOD MODEL 8: CLOSING PARISHES Some propose that the chal- day there are 2,642 Catholics lenges of declining numbers of or- for every priest worldwide, and Parishes have opened dained priests can be addressed this ratio is greater in many and closed throughout the through our approach to the re- parts of the world. (See Per- nearly 200-year history of the cruitment of priests or through sons Per Priest Chart on page Archdiocese. This occurs changes in Church law about who 5.) Foreign-born priests must when demographic, finan- is ordained. Several solutions are overcome considerable cultural cial, or other factors deter- typically presented: and language barriers to serve mine that pastoral care can Vocation Recruitment: Encour- effectively. In addition, in 1998 best be provided by another aging vocations has always and again more recently, the parish. been a priority in this Archdio- Vatican has asked the wealthier nations of the world not to re- Closing and merging par- cese. The Vocations Office has recently restructured its efforts cruit priests from poorer coun- ishes are very difficult and tries. disruptive processes. How- to develop a team approach to ever, in some cases, our ex- the invitation and formation of Who is ordained? In any dis- perience shows that parish- men for the priesthood. Re- cussion of the shortage of ioners are eventually happier cruitment efforts include voca- priests, the inevitable question when they move to new par- tion awareness programs in of who is ordained will be ishes, especially if the parish parishes, elementary and sec- raised.
Recommended publications
  • Nobility As Historical Reality and Theological
    C HAPTER O NE N OBILITY AS H ISTORICAL R EALITY AND T HEOLOGICAL M OTIF ost students of western European history are familiar with a trifunc- Mtional model of medieval social organization. Commonly associated with modern scholar Georges Duby and found in medieval documents in various forms, this model compartmentalizes medieval society into those who pray (oratores), those who fight (bellatores), and those who work (lab- oratores).1 The appeal of this popular classification is, in part, its neatness, yet that is also its greatest fault. As Giles Constable explains in an ex- tended essay, such a classification relies too fully on occupational status and thus obscures more fruitful and at times overlapping ways of classifying individuals and groups.2 Constable explores other social classifications, such as those based on gender or marital status; founded on age or gen- eration, geographical location, or ethnic origin; rooted in earned merit, function, rank, or on level of responsibility; and based in inborn or inher- ited status. Some social systems express a necessary symbiosis of roles within society (such as clergy, warriors, and laborers), while others assert a hierarchy of power and prestige (such as royal, aristocratic, and common, or lord and serf). Certain divisions, such as those based on ancestry, can be considered immutable in individuals although their valuation in a given society can fluctuate. Others, such as status in the eyes of the church, might admit of change in individuals (through, for instance, repentance) 1 2 Nobility and Annihilation in Marguerite Porete’s Mirror of Simple Souls while the standards (such as church doctrine regarding sin and repentance) might remain essentially static over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside the Middle Class
    Inside the Middle Class: Bad Times Hit the Good Life FOR RELEASE WEDNESDAY APRIL 9, 2008 12:00PM EDT Paul Taylor, Project Director Rich Morin, Senior Editor D'Vera Cohn, Senior Writer Richard Fry, Senior Researcher Rakesh Kochhar, Senior Researcher April Clark, Research Associate MEDIA INQUIRIES CONTACT: Pew Research Center 202 419 4372 http://pewresearch.org ii Table of Contents Foreword…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...3 Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………5 Overview……………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………7 Section One – A Self-Portrait 1. The Middle Class Defines Itself ………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………..28 2. The Middle Class Squeeze………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………..…….36 3. Middle Class Finances ……………………………………………………………………………………………….…………….……………………..47 4. Middle Class Priorities and Values………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………….53 5. Middle Class Jobs ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………….65 6. Middle Class Politics…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………………71 About the Pew Social and Demographic Trends Project ……………………………………………………….…………………………….78 Questionnaire and topline …………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………..79 Section Two – A Statistical Portrait 7. Middle Income Demography, 1970-2006…………………………………………………………………………………………………………110 8. Trends in Income, Expenditures, Wealth and Debt………………………………………..…………………………………………….140 Section Two Appendix ……………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………..163
    [Show full text]
  • The Integration Outcomes of U.S. Refugees
    THE INTEGRATION OUTCOMES OF U.S. REFUGEES Successes and Challenges By Randy Capps and Kathleen Newland with Susan Fratzke, Susanna Groves, Gregory Auclair, Michael Fix, and Margie McHugh MPI NATIONAL CENTER ON IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION POLICY THE INTEGRATION OUTCOMES OF U.S. REFUGEES Successes and Challenges Randy Capps and Kathleen Newland with Susan Fratzke, Susanna Groves, Gregory Auclair, Michael Fix, and Margie McHugh June 2015 Acknowledgments This report was originally prepared to inform the Migration Policy Institute (MPI) roundtable “Mismatch: Meeting the Challenges of Refugee Resettlement,” held in Washington, DC in April 2014. The private meeting convened resettlement providers, federal and state-level government officials, and civil-society stakeholders for a candid conversation on the strengths and weaknesses of the U.S. refugee resettlement program, and future directions for policy development and program expansion. The roundtable and this report were supported by a grant from the J. M. Kaplan Fund. Additional support was provided by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. © 2015 Migration Policy Institute. All Rights Reserved. Cover Design and Layout: Liz Heimann, MPI No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Migration Policy Institute. A full-text PDF of this document is available for free download from www.migrationpolicy.org. Information for reproducing excerpts from this report can be found at www.migrationpolicy.org/about/copyright-policy. Inquiries can also be directed to: Permissions Department, Migration Policy Institute, 1400 16th Street, NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20036, or by contacting [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Publication 517, Social Security
    Userid: CPM Schema: tipx Leadpct: 100% Pt. size: 8 Draft Ok to Print AH XSL/XML Fileid: … tions/P517/2020/A/XML/Cycle03/source (Init. & Date) _______ Page 1 of 18 11:42 - 2-Mar-2021 The type and rule above prints on all proofs including departmental reproduction proofs. MUST be removed before printing. Publication 517 Cat. No. 15021X Contents Future Developments ............ 1 Department of the Social Security What's New .................. 1 Treasury Internal Reminders ................... 2 Revenue and Other Service Introduction .................. 2 Information for Social Security Coverage .......... 3 Members of the Ministerial Services ............. 4 Exemption From Self-Employment Clergy and (SE) Tax ................. 6 Self-Employment Tax: Figuring Net Religious Earnings ................. 7 Income Tax: Income and Expenses .... 9 Workers Filing Your Return ............. 11 Retirement Savings Arrangements ... 11 For use in preparing Earned Income Credit (EIC) ....... 12 Worksheets ................. 14 2020 Returns How To Get Tax Help ........... 15 Index ..................... 18 Future Developments For the latest information about developments related to Pub. 517, such as legislation enacted after this publication was published, go to IRS.gov/Pub517. What's New Tax relief legislation. Recent legislation pro- vided certain tax-related benefits, including the election to use your 2019 earned income to fig- ure your 2020 earned income credit. See Elec- tion to use prior-year earned income for more information. Credits for self-employed individuals. New refundable credits are available to certain self-employed individuals impacted by the coro- navirus. See the Instructions for Form 7202 for more information. Deferral of self-employment tax payments under the CARES Act. The CARES Act al- lows certain self-employed individuals who were affected by the coronavirus and file Schedule SE (Form 1040), to defer a portion of their 2020 self-employment tax payments until 2021 and 2022.
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty and Mental Health
    Poverty and mental health A review to inform the Joseph Rowntree Foundation’s Anti-Poverty Strategy 1 POLICY REVIEW AUGUST 2016 Poverty and Mental Health: A review to inform the Joseph Rowntree Foundation’s Anti-Poverty Strategy Iris Elliott PhD FRSA August 2016 Citation The recommended citation for this review is: Elliott, I. (June 2016) Poverty and Mental Health: A review to inform the Joseph Rowntree Foundation’s Anti-Poverty Strategy. London: Mental Health Foundation. Acknowledgements Helen Barnard managed the delivery of the review for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation and co-ordinated input from her colleagues. Professor David Pilgrim, University of Liverpool; Professor David Kingdon, University of Southampton; Andy Bell, Centre for Mental Health; and Sam Callan, Centre for Social Justice were insightful reviewers. Thank you to the Mental Health Foundation team who supported the writing of this report: Isabella Goldie, Director of Development and Delivery; Marguerite Regan, Policy Manager; and Laura Bernal, Policy Officer. 2 3 Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................4 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................7 2. Poverty and Mental Health: A Conceptual Framework ...................................15 3. Poverty and Mental Health Across the Life Course ..........................................22 4. Public Services ............................................................................................................................32
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty Measures
    Poverty and Vulnerability Term Paper Interdisciplinary Course International Doctoral Studies Programme Donald Makoka, (ZEF b) Marcus Kaplan, (ZEF c) November 2005 ABSTRACT This paper describes the concepts of poverty and vulnerability as well as the interconnections and differences between these two. Vulnerability is a multi-dimensional phenomenon, because it can be related to very different kinds of hazards. Nevertheless most studies deal with the vulnerability to natural disasters, climate change, or poverty. As a result of the effects of global change, vulnerability focuses more and more on the livelihood of the affected people than on the hazard itself in order to enhance their coping capacities to the negative effects of hazards. Thus the concept became quite complex, and we present some approaches that try to deal with this complexity. In contrast to poverty, vulnerability is a forward-looking feature. Thus vulnerability and poverty are not the same. Nevertheless they are closely interrelated, as they influence each other and as very often poor people are the most vulnerable group to the negative effects of any type of hazard. There are also attempts to measure the vulnerability to fall below the poverty line, which is mostly done through income measurements. This paper therefore reviews the major linkages between poverty and vulnerability. Different measures of poverty, both quantitative and qualitative are presented. The three different forms of vulnerability namely, to natural disasters, climate and economic shocks, are discussed. The paper further evaluates different methods of measuring vulnerability, each of which employs unique and/or different parameters. Two case studies from Malawi and Europe are discussed with the conclusion that poverty and vulnerability, though not synonymous, are highly related.
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty and Inequality Prof. Dr. Awudu Abdulai Department of Food Economics and Consumption Studies
    Poverty and Inequality Prof. Dr. Awudu Abdulai Department of Food Economics and Consumption studies Poverty and Inequality Poverty is the inability to achieve a minimum standard of living Inequality refers to the unequal distribution of material or immaterial resources in a society and as a result, different opportunities to participate in the society Poverty is not only a question of the absolute income, but also the relative income. For example: Although people in Germany earn higher incomes than those in Burkina Faso, there are still poor people in Germany and non-poor people in Burkina Faso -> Different places apply different standards -> The poor are socially disadvantaged compared to other members of a society in which they belong Measuring Poverty How to measure the standard of living? What is a "minimum standard of living"? How can poverty be expressed in an index? Ahead of the measurement of poverty there is the identification of poor households: ◦ Households are classified as poor or non-poor, depending on whether the household income is below a given poverty line or not. ◦ Poverty lines are cut-off points separating the poor from the non- poor. ◦ They can be monetary (e.g. a certain level of consumption) or non- monetary (e.g. a certain level of literacy). ◦ The use of multiple lines can help in distinguishing different levels of poverty. Determining the poverty line Determining the poverty line is usually done by finding the total cost of all the essential resources that an average human adult consumes in a year. The largest component of these expenses is typically the rent required to live in an apartment.
    [Show full text]
  • Funeral Poverty: Conducting Action Research with Clergy
    Funeral Poverty: conducting action research with clergy Revd. Dr. David Primrose – Director, Transforming Communities, Diocese of Lichfield & Naomi Maynard – Independent Researcher Funeral Poverty Facts • 1 in 7 people get into financial difficulty paying to a funeral. • The average cost of a funeral in the UK is now £3,551. • The cost of funerals has increased by 80% in ten years. Funeral Poverty Facts • What % of funeral directors have prices on their website? (5%) • What % of applications to the Social Fund funeral payment are rejected? (50%) • What % of the overall cost of a funeral is covered by this payment? (35%) Walsall • Funerals per annum 2,500 • Anglican Ministers 1,510 60% • Ten parishes ˃ one per week • Council, of 100/200 12 Funeral Visit 1. Contact with church 2. Ill health and pastoral visiting 3. End of Life care 4. Death 5. Funeral Arrangements 6. Minister Visits 7. Funeral 8. Bereavement Support Financial Pack i. generic information on grants available, ii. local information on grants available, iii. sources of money advice, iv. credit union loan Project Questions • How can we help clergy to broach the topic of funeral finance during funeral visits? • Can discussion of funeral finance during funeral visits help to prevent families incurring high-cost funeral debt? Sept 15 Sept 2016 March 16 26 Clergy Clergy and Focus group 1 approached to Funeral and telephone engage with Directors interviews the project meeting Oct 15-Jan 16 June 16 11 Clergy Focus group 2 complete funeral and interview reflection forms with credit
    [Show full text]
  • Education and the Dynamics of Middle- Class Status
    June 2020 Education and the Dynamics of Middle- Class Status Bradley L. Hardy American University Dave E. Marcotte American University “Higher education is essential for a thriving society: it is the strongest, sturdiest ladder to increased socio-economic mobility and the locus, through research universities, of most of the major discoveries of the last two centuries.” -Drew Gilpin Faust Introduction: Education as a Pathway to the American Dream The economic security of America’s families is a central concern for policymakers. Benchmarks for economic security include employment, homeownership, savings and retirement security, and financial literacy. These indicators broadly characterize middle- class status and, for many, attaining and sustaining a life in the middle-class is among the most important measures of economic success. Indeed, a robust middle class is both a hallmark of aggregate economic health and the manifestation of the American dream. Access to the American middle class has been made possible by expanding educational attainment over the 20th Century (Goldin and Katz, 2001). The role of higher education in economic mobility is well established. Presently, access to post-secondary educational opportunities—especially a 4-year college degree—is increasingly seen as requisite for success in an economy that requires advanced analytical ability, facility with computers, and stronger inter-cultural communication skills (e.g. Haskins et al. 2009; Mazumder 2012). More open to question is how equitable access to higher education is, particularly during a period of sharp increases in cost of attendance. Many policy interventions, including Pell grants and subsidized student loans, have sought to reduce socioeconomic gaps in college entrance and completion (Bailey and Dynarski 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • The Upper Middle Class Continued to Grow from 2014 to 2019
    INCOME AND BENEFITS POLICY CENTER The Upper Middle Class Continued to Grow from 2014 to 2019 Stephen Rose February 2021 As we look to the new year with hopes for an end to the pandemic and the beginning of an economic recovery, it is instructive to consider what happened to American families’ incomes as the recovery from the Great Recession sped up between 2014 and 2019. Over that period, the share of people in poor and near-poor families declined, the share in middle-class families held steady, and the share in upper middle class and rich families swelled. The tail end of the recovery extends trends in the income distribution seen from 1979 to 2014 (Rose 2016). The past isn’t necessarily prologue, but the recovery from the previous recession may help us anticipate the trends in family income we will see into the coming decade. In a 2016 report (Rose 2016), I defined income classes on the basis of multiples of the poverty threshold (which varies depending on the number of people in a family—a single person is a family of one, roommates are considered separate families of one each, cohabitators are considered married and a family of two, a couple with a child is a family of three, and so on). I place the heads and spouses of families in five income classes (adult children living at home are not included): poor and near poor: income at or below 149 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL) lower middle class: income from 150 to 249 percent of FPL middle middle class: income from 250 to 499 percent of FPL upper middle class (UMC): income from 500 to 1749 percent of FPL rich: income above 1749 percent of FPL Poverty-level income for a family of three in 2014 was about $20,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Follow up Study of Slavery and Poverty Kukrouthi Village, St Ravidas Nagar District Uttar Pradesh, India
    Follow Up Study of Slavery and Poverty Kukrouthi Village, St Ravidas Nagar District Uttar Pradesh, India June 2012 | © 2012 Free the Slaves Research Team Implementation: MSEMVS, Varanasi, India Coordination: Ginny Baumann, Associate Programs Director, Free the Slaves Survey Design: Ginny Baumann, Austin Choi-Fitzpatrick, and Jessica Leslie Data Processing: Elaine Graves Data Analysis: Dr. Monti Narayan Datta Editor: Jody Sarich, Director of Research, Free the Slaves Local research team: Ms. Babita, Supervisor Mr. Motilal, Mr. Suresh Kumar, Ms. Asmin, Mr. Rajendra Prasad Surveyors Date of data collection: From 9/2011 to 10/2011 Location of survey: Kukrouthi Village, St Ravidas Nagar District, Uttar Pradesh This pre- and post-intervention study, conducted by Free the Slaves’ partner MSEMVS in India, was carried out at the beginning and end of a three year program implemented by MSEMVS with technical assistance from Free the Slaves. The study is intended to provide insight into: i) Whether or not slavery and trafficking have been eradicated in the village of Kukrouthi in St Ravidas Nagar District, Uttar Pradesh; and ii) To determine if other socio-economic conditions of people living in the community have also improved. The survey looks at changes in the economic, social, educational, health, and political status of the households residing in the village. It is the first of eight similar village level studies, focused on locations where Free the Slaves India partners are implementing a rights-based, community organizing approach to slavery eradication. Follow up data collection at seven further locations (where the baseline was taken in 2010) will take place at the end of 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Imputing Poverty Efficient? an Example from Refugee Data in Chad
    Is Imputing Poverty Efficient? An example from refugee data in Chad Theresa Beltramo Hai-Anh H. Dang Ibrahima Sarr Paolo Verme1 December 2019 Abstract Collecting household survey data on refugees remains a challenge, at least in the foreseeable future, for various logistical and technical reasons. We address this challenge by applying cross- survey imputation methods to a combined survey and UNHCR census-type dataset to predict the welfare of refugees in Chad. Our proposed cross-survey imputation method offers poverty estimates that fall within a 95% margin of the true rate. This result is robust to different poverty lines, sets of regressors, and modelling assumptions of the error term. The method also outperforms widely used methods such as Proxy Means Tests (PMT) and the targeting method currently used by humanitarian organizations in Chad, although the latter performs surprisingly well given its simplicity. JEL classifications: C15, F22, I32, O15, O20. Keywords: Refugees; Forced displacement; Targeting; Poverty; Chad. 1 * Theresa Beltramo: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Rue de Montbrilliant 92, Geneva 1201, Switzerland (e- mail: [email protected]); Hai-Anh Dang: DECAT- Analytics and Tools Team-The World Bank, 1818 H St. N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433 (e-mail: [email protected]); Ibrahima Sarr: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (e-mail: [email protected]); Paolo Verme: Fragility, Conflict, Violence - The World Bank, 1818 H St. N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433 (e- mail: [email protected]). The authors are grateful to Kristen Himelein and Aly Sanoh for helpful comments on a previous version. This work is part of the program ``Building the Evidence on Protracted Forced Displacement: A Multi-Stakeholder Partnership''.
    [Show full text]